DAILY YAHOONEWS PROPAGANDA, JULY 26TH 2021, IOC AND “HEAT”

Yahoo”NEWS” is one big lie after another. 7/26/21, yahoo”NEWS” headlines

The fraud and deception never stops. I originally started my website at yahoonewsreview because of the egregious fraud and sorcery of yahoo. It was shut down, everything lost and I could not acquire the http.

Look at the picture associated with the headline, “Japan lied about its weather, and the IOC knew it.”

What weather is yahoo”NEWS” referring to? Is yahoo”news” referring to summer wether, you know, hot weather?

Look at the picture. A picture of a three bodies lying in the road. Must be due to the heat, of summer, ho, as usual, as always.

Wait, those are runners. Runners often collapse after an event. Did those runners collapse after a run due to heat or due to running?

Sorcery best describes the fraudulent manipulation of liberal “NEWS”.

Yahoo”news” is just sick, sickening, and sickeningly dishonest. Yahoo”news” reports, “…and the IOC knew it”

What did the IOC know? Did the IOC know that summer Olympic events occur in summer, in the heat of summer, in the heat of a one of the “hottest”, HOTTEST months of the year? Wow, such terribly reflective information, that IOC knows summer weather occurs in summer.

Look at the other “news” articles the sorcerers at yahoo”news” provide.

Top of the list, today, some dumb broad in a bikini. WOW! That is such important news, especially to animals that live by instinct, manipulated, conditioned idiots that respond sexually to stimulus by sorcerers using them.

Down the page we find an article about Britney Spears going topless. Wow, another WOW! That is so important. Why does yahoo”NEWS” not report about hunter biden’s laptop and his father’s involvement in scamming companies of foreign nations? How much money did Hunter say went into pop’s pockets?

How about “NEWS” of the hundreds, thousands killed by gangs in the inner cities? BLM does nothing about this.

Yahoo”news” and the whole of liberal media is using YOU.

YAHOO”NEWS”, INCITING HATRED AND RACISM: PROPAGANDA FOR THE PEOPLE FROM LIARS AND LOSERS.

Regarding yahoo”news” headline news for simpletons.

The day after The Tampa Bay Buccaneers whupped Kansas City Chiefs, yahoo”news” and other propaganda mills could not help themselves. They lie.

The headline reads, “Mathieu: Brady called me something I won’t repeat.”

That’s it? That’s all? Is Frank Schwab so simple he cannot expand to ask simple, related, maybe even obvious questions? Is it not a role of reporting to report the actual things, and not the real twists and lies? It is obvious Frankie is not interested in truth, or cannot comprehend it, having so efficiently avoided good questions and answers. What a moron, or useless liar.

Well, actually Frankie is useful to someone, or something. Who incites racial strife? Who keeps incorrectly identifying racist comments and events? Liars and cheats, and thieves continually lie to deceive the readers, the ones they hate. Everyone knows that liars do not respect or love their victims. Is poor reporting hatred? Maybe yahoo”news” can correctly, and I mean correctly, define hate. 

This is sport. Has anyone watched an NHL hockey fight? Are they singing hymns to each other as they try to knock their opponents senseless?

A question erased from drone Schwab’s dented head is, What unrepeatable words did Mathieu say? How stupid and dishonest can yahoo”news” and Frankie be?

Is yahoo so manipulative, and hateful of those who read yahoo “NEWS”?

Why does yahoo make something of nothing? Wait, telling Mathieu something, after Mathieu waved a finger in Brady’s face, is bad? Is a better player not allowed to defend his person? Did Mathieu sack Brady once during the game?

What did Mathieu say to Brady? What did Mathieu say to Brady to incite Brady’s reply? Did I use that word incite?

Why does yahoo”news” not ask these questions? Is yahoo”news” NEWS or “news”?

If this is “reporting” by yahoo”news”, then what would other words mean to yahoo”news”: words like cheating, stealing, lying, and insurrection (without weapons- how stupid)?

Maybe we could get yahoo”news” to tell us what Antifa really is. D’oh, that would be reporting, truthfully: two words reporting and truthfully, and these are two words I know yahoo”news” could not define, both being a foreign language to propaganda puppets at yahoo”news”.

VIOLENCE-INCITING PRECEDENT BY TWISTED, DEVILISH LIBERAL MEDIA, DAVID KNOWLES OF YAHOO”NEWS”

Precedent after precedent by the sick and twisted liberal media.

When, ever, has a news source identified a complete list of those who voted a certain way? It is unconscionable that yahoo”news”, a goon operative from yahoo”news”, David Knowles, reported, “Here are the Republicans who voted to contest the Electoral College votes showing Biden beat Trump.”

Did Knowles provide a list of democrat politicians that refused to swear out affidavits that Trump colluded? In other words, did Knowles provide a list of democrats who lied and prosecuted an impeachment, a four year long coup against a duly elected and innocent President Trump? Did Knowles provide a list of democrats who refused to make their claims subject to scrutiny at peril of being charged with perjury? Did knowles provide a list of democrats who made accusations who also then refused to admit their claims would not survive legal scrutiny, making their claims null and void? Did knowles provide a list of demnetocrats who lied and prosecuted impeachment as if their lies were truth?

Why would knowles provide such a heinous list of republicans who acted within boundaries of law? To whom is knowles presenting this list? What is the purpose of identifying those who simply voted in a constitutional manner against something that should have been investigated?

This attack, inciting of hatred, is the bolshevik way and it is an omen of things to come.

Not only is Trump abandoning OUR office of the President to a Communist Chinese operative, but he has allowed those who supported our claims to our presidency, to be identified, vilified with dishonest presumption, and placed before the public as having committed an offense.

Knowles is inciting violence.

I would be worried if I were one of the many republican representatives, some with pictures attached in the article, that the propaganda and presumption attached, is an invitation for harm.

WOW!

If the media can go after “leaders”, representatives, and Trump allows it, being in a position of responsibility to protect We, the People, the media can go after anyone. The media can vilify, presume guilt and pronounce judgement, always guilty of political offenses with criminal attachments, if not condemned to worse.

Dear fellow Americans, are you aware of this gross evil to which the dementocrats, liberals and progressives have subjected you?

You are not only considered part of the useless eaters, the masses of “sh_t producers” the “New Olympians” and politically elite identify as detrimental to their world, but you are considered expendable more than republicans because tyranny knows it must continue to keep those close, living in fear, while keeping productive slaves working. Democrats have a much higher incidence of laziness and living off the government welfare systems.

You fools who argue that biden won, are slitting your own throats. Everyone knows biden  and harris cheated. Everyone knows that the elections were rigged and that biden and harris are benefitting from subversive elements that cheated and controlled ballot counting. You know it is true. You know that where there is smoke there is fire. You know that if hundreds, more like thousands, of claims of voter fraud, all directed at democrats, exists, there must be some truth to it. You know that it is possible a report of a small number of ballot frauds could be the tip of the iceberg. You know law, judicial and just law, would investigate hundreds of sworn statements of fraud. And you think it will all be okay, for you, because your preferred party is now in power.

You must also think that the party that lied and cheated, and stole, will magically be nice to you, and not lie cheat or steal from you. You must magically believe that if you disagree on one, inevitable issue, your rulers will allow subversion to pass. Are you insane to think vampires, thugs, cheats, thieves, manipulative inciters of fraud and violence, will be nice to you when you disagree?

Do you think there is not one thing that you will find you dislike about the upcoming administration? What will you do when the democrat progressives, marxist/bolsheviks continue to raise taxes, as they have promised, and you reach a point where you cannot afford heavy taxation, and you complain? Do you think they, who have cheated so many millions, will regard you as special? Your head will be on the chopping block before your republican counterparts. Tyranny knows principles of Sun Tzu’s Art of War. The applicable principle in this instance is that to prosecute a war (war against republicans) one must keep one’s military units and faculties free of dissension and contention. Tyranny must keep its agencies and military loyal and cleansed. A minor complaint and tyranny sees that as deadly, and thus you as dead.

Do you think I am making this up? Are you so foolish to avoid knowing?

I ask all people, especially democrat party supporters to join me in eliminating the democrat, bolshevik, progressive, liberal elite so we can live. It is either them or us.

Heaven help you if you are identified by media, like Knowles has done.

Is it possible the “Trump mob” is a group of agent provocateurs? Do you know what that is?

If there was any subversive activity by BLM and/or antifa at the capitol on January 6th, when all the riots took place, do you think the “leaders”, the organizers of the riots and trouble are looking out for their agents, now in trouble with FBI, CIA, and DC police? They were sacrificed, and you will be as well.

Good luck. You must join with your republican friends and fight.

Just look at the existing realities.

Ignorant Julio Rosas of ABC “NEWS”, presumed the mob that attacked the media, was a group of Trump supporters. It could be a matter of a simple mistake.

What if Knowles were to be wrong, not evil, not angry or hate-motivated, just a human making a poor choice in words, and what if that group Knowles identifies includes you? What the results of knowles irrefutably evil excoriating of republican representatives following decorum and law (representatives who voted against ratifying the Electoral College), will be what you face. You are nothing but cannon fodder for the elitist, dementocrat, bolshevik/progressive monsters who now have totalitarian control over, YOU!

YAHOO”NEWS” REPORTS ALLEGED REPORTS OF ALLEGATIONS OF REPORTS, 12/1/20

Regarding Yahoo”NEWS” reports Tuesday, December 1st, 2020.

For a thinking person, realizing the logic, law and reality of my points in this commentary, should not be difficult. But, this is part of the problem we rational people face. Democrats typically respond with emotional energy and not logic. Logic saves lives, rushing into dark caves to get the bad man with yellow hair, is not smart.

Yahoo”NEW” cannot present a truthful story or report, or allow a clear assessment of real news to be published to save their own souls, if any of the yahoo”NEWS” staff has one.

The headlines, tell the stories, everyday. I do mean stories. A story, like a novel, novella, roman (latin for story- romantic…), is fiction. It is all fiction. Yahoo”NEWS” stories are fictional stories. Most news media presents stories, not fact.

A simple fact: if somebody were to threaten you, would you know who and what the threat is? If you were threatened and wanted to take the threat public, would you point a finger at a blank face, a shadow, a scary dream of monsters under your bed?

If someone threatened you, you certainly would want the public to know who it is so that if something did actually happen to you, justice would be served. You want a finger pointed at someone specific because you want that revelation to act as a deterrent to he or she who threatened you. Is that logical?

Notice, however, the sentence structure of that phrase: justice will be served.

An injustice is an injustice against natural law’s justice. So nobody, neither victim nor perpetrator is “served” for the crime already committed. Justice is independent of the being. Some erroneously call this karma, some call it the universe or providence.

It just so happens this way, that justice serves injustice which claims victims and perpetrators. The idea of serving justice is to remove the classification and deleterious effects of the acts of injustice violating justice. Hence, the victim is never served when justice is served.

The next potential victim denied access by the predator and/or perpetrator, is served by denying further injustice.

Those who commit crimes against others commit crimes against justice, which, again, is independent due to natural law being the holder of justice for the individual over anything and everything.

But, there is a concession made when man, men, or a group decide they will voluntarily enter into a pact for legitimate self defense.

Frederick Bastiat spoke in his essays of man’s natural tendency to live off the labors of others, and man’s natural tendencies to band together for common, legitimate self-defense.

This dichotomy is the basis for the real scale: left wing and right wing. Left and right has nothing to do with party affiliation. That is a construct of those who need an enemy for comparative morality, always lying of the other and making themselves superior, morally and ethically. Trying.

Yahoo”NEWS” cannot allow for the individual to know the individual’s powers and authority, so yahoo”NEWS”, like all the progressive/bolshevik media sources and outlets, must propagate many ideas and lies to distract each and every person from natural law.

The law to which I refer, is dashed by a yahoo”NEWS” article of December 1st, 2020. The headline reads, “Georgia elections official slams rhetoric.”

Gabriel Sterling of the Georgia Secretary of State’s office, claimed, “…it has gone too far, it has all gone too far”, referring to a comment by Joe DiGenova that a CSA official should be taken outside and shot. Not in good taste, but not a threat.

Then he claimed a 20 year old was threatened and a noose placed in his proximity. Who was threatened? No name? No event. Who did the threatening? No name? No event. If there is no name, no event, no truth to the claim, then it is a lie.

If there is no witness, including a real person and not a, “…someone of this office,  the threat did not happen. The threat did not take place. The threat does not exist. This all makes Sterling’s comments a fraud. He is a liar.

The terrible acting of indignation by Sterling is better than some, but still poor quality and unconvincing. His stops and emphases are poorly placed because of a poorly written script. You can see him stop, as if by command.

The threats did not occur. So why is this bolshevik actor presenting this “NEWS”? It is, as always, to manipulate the weakest cross-section of society, as all tyrannies always do, to violent action, at that cross-section’s risk and eventual demise, while the manipulative liars absorb the losses of wrongfully identified innocents and the gains of the dead or incarcerated puppet-perpetrators.

Then the bolshevik agent presses on that somehow, magically, without communication, President Trump is to blame.

Bolshevik sterling then speaks to President Trump, “Mr. President, you have not condemned these actions or this language. Senators, you have not condemned this language or these actions. This has to stop.”

Why is it President Trump’s responsibility to condemn words? Why is it President Trump’s responsibility to condemn fake threats and a fake noose? Again, no witnesses, no noose, no victim, it did not happen.

Do you see, how justice, independent of people, is required to be satisfied in this “NEWS” presentation?

Was there really a 20 something year old tech threatened? No. Justice is served because punishment cannot be administered where crime cannot be found. Justice is served when nothing of an effect is the result of a nothing cause. All remains balanced.

However, sterling lied, and he should be held accountable. How is that done? I do it partially with this commentary, calling for sterling’s job, and pension. No more pensions for politicians!

But the offense is worse that sterling being a bolshevik agent provocateur and lying about events and another’s responsibility.

I am not, and will not speak to the issues at hand, from which sterling is recruited to distract a gathered audience of hate-motivated, biased political collaborators. The media will not dissect sterling’s words and surmise the reality that there is no crime where there is no victim and, hence, there is no blame. The media propagates the bolshevik flip-flop of innocence and guilt: in reality, justice and injustice. The issues I refer to are that there is overwhelming evidence of election fraud; that the fake indignation is misplace by sterling who makes dubious efforts to distract from democrat violence, and threat, thousands of violent events refusing republican witnesses and threats under pressure to certify.

The issue of this commentary is simply to point out alleged, suspected, claimed, unidentified people and events do not only make poor press conferences by buffoons somehow credible, but these “NEWS” conferences, and the usual dem/lib, progressive/bolshevik outrages, make sterling and the colluders all liars.

Sterling then claims the wife of one official received sexual threats to her cell phone. By whom? Was it a friend who has her phone number? Why would we believe this claim by sterling when he clearly lied about other claims? Who made the threats? Nobody was charged. Nobody made the threats. I met “nobody”, in a dem/lib dream of bogey men and monsters under beds, to scare you, to do something dumb. I met “nobody” fabricated and hidden under beds for the gains of democrat bolsheviks and their puppet-pinheads. Is that you, dear democrat?

A threat is a criminal offense, yet sterling forgot to mention that there were no charges or arrests? It is a curious thing that so many republicans commit so many crimes but the law is missing.

Will you, dear fellow American, continue to be misled to your own demise?

Alleged threats and an alleged noose make no offense.

Alleged anything without a witness is a telltale sign that a liar is trying to manipulate the listener(s), YOU.

Notice, sterling scolded President Trump and Senators. Did sterling forget about the democrat party controlled house of representatives? Why?

Why, dear fellow citizen, did you not ask that question?

Why did you not ask who the alleged 20 something year old is and who made the threats? Why did you not ask why President Trump is responsible for actions and words of others? Why did you not ask why sterling lies? WHY?

Why do you not ask questions to save your own necks? Why do you not know that playing with fire gets you burned?

The manipulators want the gains of effect without real cause, to manipulate the weak of mind who will not and cannot, for cowardice, look at facts, reality, and the meaning of words. Liars want offensive without the cause of offense. Liars want crime without the causes, criminal activity. They want this, and you should know, because they never, NEVER produce the cause to the effect they claim they, you and nobodies deserve. 

I have been trying to impress upon democrat party supporters, as few as they really are, that courting marxist rhetoric, places the adherent closer to marxist/bolshevik society, puts you closer to the dangerous fires of marxist/bolshevik violence, wedges you, democrat party supporter, firmly in democrat party progressive fire, and loss and demise.

It is your heads, literally on the chopping block. Literal is literal but I make no argument of this point, at this time.

Every claim, every sentence, every attack and distraction by sterling in the whole address, is a lie.

But yahoo”NEWS” never stops. Alleged threats are dangerous more than 150 days of violent rioting by the democrat party’s goons: antifa and BLM.

Alleged “NEWS” reports that a doctor used a selfie to claim covid is a hoax. I have been saying that from the beginning. Quo bono?

Alleged “…post presidency norm…” Yahoo”NEWS” proclaims, “Trump to restart foreign deals, breaking a post-presidency norm”.

Who says it is a norm? Who defines normal? Who defines the duration of a job, democrats?

If I had a landscape job that needed a lot of work all at once to finish, and I hired ten guys with the promise, the verbal contract, that at the end of the day when the job is completed, I would pay each of them a predetermined amount of money, and that all agreed, we would have a deal and proceed to the end for all.

But a roaming, rabid reporter drops by, out of his or her jurisdiction and invades my project, like liberal media always does, and declares it is not normal for me to hire 10 guys to finish a job under the circumstances to which we, not the reporter, agreed. What audacity to invade and try to seize control of so much of others’ lives Is inconceivable, utterly indescribable, yet this is what the bastard bolshevik liberal media does every day, with every report and every claim and proclamation, including a vain attempt to establish a non-existent “norm” so they can criticize one they hate so much they abandon rationale and humanity.

Now I say, hang the bastards!

Media does not establish norms, and when media lies about norms and tries to establish norms that benefit themselves at the loss and demise of others, media is guilty of lying and manipulating the weak of mind.

President Trump is finishing the job to which he was elected, working to the very end of this dispensation, before beginning the next.

Go to hell you bastard bolshevik anita kumar, politico, and yahoo”NEWS”!

CRITIQUE OF CHRISTOPHER WILSON’S YAHOO”NEWS” COMMENTARY OF APRIL 21st, 2020, “Who is behind the coronavirus social distancing protests?”

CRITIQUE OF CHRISTOPHER WILSON’S YAHOO”NEWS” COMMENTARY OF APRIL  21st, 2020, “Who is behind the coronavirus social distancing protests?”

Wilson should be referred to as senior fabricator.

I read Wilson’s article and wondered where the connection to his headline claim can be found. Wilson tries a number of tricks to deflect and distract from the fraud of the headline.

Like I always say/write: if it attacks the innocent like a bolshevik, if it attacks the middle class like a bolshevik, if it attacks truth like a bolshevik, it is a bolshevik. In this case, “it” is Wilson.

Tricks to make you, dear reader, think there is some kind of connection, are meant to manipulate you, yourself. Are you angry that someone is trying to organize and get conservatives to protest? Who says the organizer or protestors are conservatives? Why does this affect you? Is it because We, the People have a right to protest? Is “someone
“ Trying to attach a negative or offensive emotion to a headline claim?  Are you that easily manipulated?

Are you upset because someone is organizing rights to protest? Maybe it is because you think there is something inherently wrong that someone behind the scenes misdoing something morally reprehensible? Have you studied the words of the article to find why it is morally reprehensible? Is your anger due to your false perception of why people are protesting?

Two things to consider, fellow American supporter of democrat party and liberalism: Do you know what conservative is and do you think those who lie to you do so for your benefit?

What is a conservative? Typically a conservative supports small government. How much of your tax dollar do you think is used for We, the People? The bigger government gets the greater the loss due to corruption, inefficiency and nepotism. Not a single government person produces a thing. How many managers do you think a company with no production can support? Big government is a managing monopoly, monopolizing force of law, raw power against, you. Government that grows by creating more managers does so for itself: for the corrupt people that want to perpetuate their power and profit. When you witness growth of a government by the government itself, you witness self-serving protectionism.

Conservatives also support conserving the balanced middle, that is, Constitutional Republic.

Wait. You did not know, or do not believe that a Constitutional Republic is the balanced middle? Who has been lying to you all these years that America is a democracy?

Look for yourself. Find a democracy, just one; search the whole world, all of history, and find a democracy that has a Bill of Rights for the individual. Conservatives conserve those rights. Not that important, you think. Why would you think that unless you have been trained to think it?

Regarding these unimportant rights, pick one. Pick two, three.

Pick the right you will give up tomorrow. Find a non-conservative who supports conserving your rights, that one you just gave away.

You would be okay with loss of freedom to speak, correct? You have allowed democrats and liberals to speak for you, lying about the Constitutional Republic system of self-governance. Self-governance? Is that also a new term for you? Who speaks of self governance, democrats or conservatives?

When you surrendered truth to a system of top-down rule, as opposed to self-governance, and you allowed that entity or person to speak lies about truth, to you, you gave up your freedom of speech long ago.

You can only expect what follows the lies, that affect you. They will surely affect you because they are directed at you, and you had better not disagree or you will be called that nasty word, conservative.

Wilson is lying, for you and to you.

So, again. What rights are you willing to surrender, and to whom? Such a good example, because it is quite physical; actually they are all good examples because they are all physical and easy to visualize.

Surrender your right to love freely. How do you get to work? Will you be required to apply for a pass to work in this location or that? How many contractors, sub-contractors, truck drivers, delivery personnel will be required to beg permission, or apply? What if you are stopped without a pass? Are you going to enjoy jail? Will your attorney need to apply for a pass to see you before you are read your miranda rights? Oops, forgot. You don’t have any.

Why does Wilson try to make you believe, in ignorance, that constative is bad? Is Wilson an agent of non-conservative, or is he also willing to surrender his rights? Maybe, like most democrats and liberals, he thinks the law will not apply to him because he has served those who take your rights. Maybe he thinks he will be given a carte blanche pass because he lied to you, I mean wrote an article without verification or backing of claims,

So, to dissect Wilson’s fraud, I mean propaganda, I mean story, in the first paragraph he tosses three rights at you that have negative connotations? I wonder, if your home is being invaded and your neighbor has a gun, and you don’t, how long will I take police to send aid? If police are so busy taking applications for freedom of moverment; permission to move, when do you think an officer might have tome to get to you?

We do not have to “enjoy” that application of benefits from democrat liberal seizure of your rights. We already know that, without politicization, by the time the police arrive, you are already victimized, whether that means you are dead or robbed.

What if, however, you decide to call your neighbor because you know he understands the second amendment, has a firearm, and likes you and yours, and would come to your aid, in seconds. What if your neighbor is a “crazy”, gun-toting, conservative, who knows he does not have a right to freedom of movement about the country? If he comes to your aid, and the police arrive and check his “papers”, he could go to jail. You are on your own brother. The reality, and the purpose of politicizing everything to democrat rule, it would be worse with the loss of your rights and the requirement for papers and permission.

Is there a problem with being white? Is Wilson trying to get you to think there is something wrong with being white? Are you white? How does it feel to be presumed “guilty”?

Oh, you did not know that a conservative is committed to preserving, conserving your rights, and everyone’s right to face his or her accuser, and be presumed innocent? Sorry, that’s not you, anymore, because you believe liars such as Wilson. He tricked you three times in the first paragraph.

The protests are not only “against” social distancing orders. Protests were primarily against lock-down dictates. People need to eat and no government knows what We, the People want. Why did Wilson tell that lie? We had a protest right here in Salt Lake city, April 20th, 2020. It was a protest to get Governor Stalin-Herbert to lift the cower-at-home, I mean snivel-at-home, I mean shelter-at-home orders: dictates.

People are dying by these orders but neither Wilson nor Stalin-herbert care for that truth or reality. Wilson is concerned for the color of the skin of people at these rallies, and if they are exercising their rights to carry firearms. Wilson is probably lying about that anyway. Are you afraid to go to “conservative” protests against heavy-handed cower-at-home, I mean starve-at-home orders, because there might be people with firearms? I bet there was not a single person with a firearm at any rally, but Wilson needs you afraid so his lies seem more credible.

This is just the way of liars, propaganda agents, Wilson being one of the least effective.

You see, Wilson already has you afraid, of untruths. Wilson can now tell you anything and you will believe even though he has not provided sa single reference, truth, picture, or connection to his claims.

This is political science in its most disgusting application, democrats and liberals. Conservatives do not need to lie. Am I lying? I told you the founding fathers designed a balance between left and right. Do you know what is on the scale of left and right? Who told you it was democrat, left and republican, right? Whoever told you that is a liar, but that is accepted for decades now, because of the continual lies of one side, not the other. You see, one side is on a side while the other  “side” is, absolutely is the balanced middle: balanced between tyranny or totalitarianism on the left and anarchy on the right.

Don’t believe me, please. Go read  and learn for yourself, or trust Wilson.

Read The Federalist Papers. Loo at the introductions to the founding documents. Do they read the “democracy” of the United States or do they read, “The Constitution Of The Republic Of The United States”?

Wilson’s second paragraph is a mess, a meaningless twist of conditionals and oxymorons. He claims, “ Although…”.

Do I need to explain “although”? “Although” is a word used to inject an opposition and condition. Wilson begins this paragraph with “although”, a conditional, then makes another conditional claim, making the sentence and thus, the claim itself, doubly conditional, or highly unlikely, if not completely fraudulent. Tricks.

Although what you see and what we all see, without evidence of guns or racism, it is not real, although presumes to make the statement real.  How is that for a lie. Although I am standing outside your store, I have none of your merchandise on my person, and there is no evidence anyone has been in your store, much less broken into it, I m somehow, magically guilty because you say so? Although?

Do you see the hypocrisy and fabrication of fake reality? People wonder why conservatives, republic-oriented Americans and the President call Wilson and his “kind” of journalism fake news. It is fake, fabricated from literary tricks, rhetoric (lies) and outright hate-motivated trickery..

Wilson continues with a claim that the protestors, “…have largely been organized by conservative activists.”

What is a conservative activist? Does Wilson explain, define, describe what he is talking about? Can Wilson give us a clear understanding and an example? No? Would that be a fake claim from a fake news source? Is Wilson trying to create a fear or presumption in your mind?

Wilson’s sick and twisted tricks are just beginning. It is a pattern of manipulation.

Next trick, after [presumption, is to use authority then fake credibility, seldom credible, usually presumed credible and above the masses’ presumed sub-intelligence.

All you need to do is look at the sentence structure to realize it is a tactic to twist reality in your mind. What kind of loving father or other would do that to YOU?

Wilson, in addition to being a grammatical moron, cannot communicate propaganda very well. He being a new paragraph without a noun. The significance, in case you think this is insignificant, is that Wilson is a second rate writer, at best, failing to present reliable or credible information regarding anything. He is a loser at even the worst propaganda.

Why does Wilson write that the rallies are pushing back against social distancing when the truth is so far from what Wilson claims? Why is Wilson lying? Why do liars lie?

Here is the deep and dark secret about propaganda, misinformation and manipulation: liars lie because they believe they need to lie. Liars lie because the truth does not support their fabrications and deception.

The rallies are not political. Wilson, like all true bolsheviks (seriously), makes everything political because politics is the absolute rule by a ruling class. Wilson is part of that politicization of everything: even aspect of your life.

Politics requires that you think of the leader(s) when you eat your breakfast. Politics requires that you remember the leader (or leaders) saved you from this or that crisis. Politics requires that you forget the leader(s) made the numerous crises that reduced your rights until you had grants from the leader(s).

Wilson is involved in politicizing everything, for tyranny, the leader(s).

Wilson lies about it, naturally. He must.

So, the fifth paragraph, Wilson starts with a politicization of a protest. Wilson uses the word, “rally”. It was not a “rally”, it was a protest, like the protest my friends attended in Salt Lake City. Why does Wilson purposely use the word rally?

Rally is a word associated with conservatives and President Trump. Rally is now a conservative word, according the dem/lib propaganda. The democrats could not rally support so they decided to negate the positive effects by demeaning the word. Wilson is a part of that destruction, a bolshevik tactic, to destroy language to suit politics.

The people at the protest were protesting against republican governor. Did Wilson mention that protests by so-called republican-backed supporters were protests against republican governors? No, lying Christopher Wilson did not want that truth known because then the reality could not politicized to suit a democrat/liberal deception.

Rallies by republicans against republican governors are then, in reality, protests, not at all like Wilson propagates.

Wilson claims, “Some of the rallies are being pushed by Republican-allied groups in battleground states with Democratic governors.” Which “Republican-allied groups”? Can Wilson identify one? No, he does not even try because it is a lie, an opening to a paragraph to give his words a sense of credibility-by-emotional attachment, a fake attachment he created in the opening paragraph.One name of a real person would provide real credibility. Wilson’s goal is to deceive so he must lie, by fabrication of a scenario or connection that simply does not exist.

Maybe there is a connection. So what? Are democrats not connected to liberals and are liberal causes not backed by democrat groups? Did The DNC hire Christopher Steele, an ex- British agent, to fabricate a dossier regarding Trump? Yes, Hillary hire Fusion GPS who hired Christopher Steel to fabricate, form nothing, with the help of Steele’s Russian contacts, a hate-motivated dossier the democrat party used as pretense to illegally investigate President Trump. Was it this same dossier democrat-party supporters used to lie to the FISA courts to get warrants? So what if a political party is involved in these rallies? So what if a the republican party is involved in stopping democrat party-controlled states from roughshod over every citizen in that state, including democrat-supporting and ex-democrat supporting people? So what?

Did Wilson mention that the rallies included democrat-party supporting citizens? No. HHe is guilty of politicizing this. Politicizing means making a representative reality into a gain for the democrat party and the move left, on the scale: totalitarian government, democrats.

I could go on and on dissecting every line, every sentence and claim Wilson made. Everything he wrote in that political attack is an outright lie, or bolshevik magic to turn everything into a rally for democrat tyranny. Wilson is guilty of rallying by lying. Wilson is guilty of politicizing a simple protest by people who want to live. Wilson is guilty of attempting to turn a simple protest by people into a political event to support a political party, the democrats.

Wilson is guilty of all the things he attempts to attach to his political enemies, those for whom his democrat/liberal supporters hire him to attack.

YAHOO”NEWS” REPORTED LATE SUNDAY THAT SPANISH CORONAVIRUS, “…surged by 5,000 cases overnight.”

YAHOO”NEWS” REPORTED LATE SUNDAY THAT SPANISH CORONAVIRUS, “…surged by 5,000 cases overnight.”

In a country with a population of approximately 47 million people, 5,000 cases of anything is nothing.

Chances of contracting, or being one of those 5,000, is a 1 in 9,400 chance, or .0.000106 percent.

One hundred days of this rate of growth, which is not going to happen, puts a Spaniard at risk of contracting the virus at 1 in 940, over 100 days, 1.06 percent. This does not represent rapid infection which is one condition of an epidemic, and it absolutely does not represent an epidemic in terms of total numbers infected, or most significant, death irrefutably attributed to the blight. 

Most important it does not represent the high mortality rate also needed to be qualified as epidemic. Under this “reported” worst case scenario, the chance of dying from “covid” is about 1 in 10,000. This means if you were to take a town of 10,000 people in Spain you would find, in 100 days, one death. And, true to all “cases”, at least half are reported Covid even though deaths are not confirmed, only assumed. Consider my report of the first Covid case in Utah where a whole bevy of officials contributed to the fraud.

If Spain is the worst there is no epidemic anywhere, including less affected countries, hence there is no pandemic.

Regarding President Trump lying to troops during address to troops at a so-called traditional address he skipped.

Regarding President Trump lying to troops during address to troops at a so-called traditional address he skipped. How is this possible except with yahoohatenews rhetoric hiding and twisting details in the “reports”.
Yahoonews simply cannot be relied upon to report truth.
I receive email notifications in my yahoo email account from daily yahoo news.
Today I received a yahoonews email with the headline, “Trump misleads troops on military pay hikes.”
When did this event occur? When did Trump address the military? Yahoo news reported it December 27th, just after his traditional Christmas address to American military personnel.
Yesterday, yahoonews sent an email with the day’s headlines, that yahoonews produces in one way or another.
Just yesterday yahoonews email headline stated, “Trump skips traditional military visit with troops.”
How did Trump address the troops when he, according to yahoo news, skipped the military address?
Which is it?
Yahoonews claims Trump is bad, baaaad, for skipping the traditional address, and Trump is bad, baaaad, for misleading troops? How could President Trump be bad for misleading troops during a traditional Christmas address when he is bad for skipping the traditional address?
Which bad is Trump, yahoonews? Maybe yahoonews is trying to portray President Trump as bad in everything he does? Why does yahoonews lie to portray our president as bad?
Does this lie, truly a blatant, hate-motivated fabrication, make yahoonews a fake news outlet, like CNN and MSNBC?
This is what I have stated all along.
I have made clear my position that yahoonews is fake news, craftily creating fake reality, trying to undermine American representative government, and cannot be trusted to relate real news without twisting it in one way or another.

FEW OPTIONS TO PROTECT YOUNG IMMIGRANTS, JANUARY 2. 2017

Originally published on yahoonewsreview.com, January 2, 2017, yahoo”news” reported, “Few options to protect young immigrants”

From what do “young immigrants” need protection, those they steal from through welfare; the females they are attacking and plan to molest?

Why did yahoo”news” not report, “Few options to protect young black males in the inner cities from decimation?

Why is obama more interested in muslim immigrants than Americans?

Why does yahoo”news” not investigate this disparity of concern and ensuing action

Is obama trying to present a presumption that immigrants face violence or some kind of mystical sanction? Maybe obama is trying to mobilize resources for immigrants using the pretense that they need “protection” from the bogey man?

Upon opening the yahoo“news” report the heading reads, “Obama has few options to protect young immigrants”.

What about old immigrants? None?

Why does one person need to ravage an entire nation to protect invaders that have been given fabricated enemies as excuses?

By all presumptions, and only by fake news presumptions, do illegal, invading military-aged men need our resources. This is obama trying to funnel OUR money to his allies, muslims.

Who loses? Where is the effort and resources for inner city Americans struggling and facing “few options”, as yahoo”news” is so quick to describe? Where is even a mention by the bastard president, obama, who routinely ignores the plight, challenges, lack of options for inner city people? Where is the concern? Why the concern for the invading horses over Americans?

Alicia A. Caldwell, AP, just another propaganda regurgitator, writes for yagoo”news”, “Barack Obama is under pressure during his final weeks as president to do something – anything – to secure the future of hundreds of thousands of immigrants brought to the U.S. as children who could face deportation under the Trump administration. His options appear few.”

Did this propaganda salotte (slut), alicia, start off with lies and presumptions by instruction or is she ignorant and deceptive all on her own?

Who has put obama under pressure? Can alicia tell us that? Why is there pressure for obama to add illegality to his already illegal, subversive, treasonous actions? Why does caldwell, not question this? Why does calwell not investigate how many children, cruelly separated from their parents, obama illegally brought to OUR country? Why has caldwell not bothered to identify the numbers of illegal invaders that are children, men,and women? Why the added presumptions to dishonest presumptions caldwell attempts to ram down Americans’ throats?

Obama has absolutely no authority, except where fabrication of “news” manipulates Americans to believe there is authority in a centralized dictatorship! Why has caldwell not questioned the ethics and legality of obama doing anything without the mandate of We, the People? Why the absolute fealty from caldwell for a treasonous series of actions?

The questions are many but the one stands out. Why is yahoo”news” involved in fabricating fake, centralized power for a traitor illegally supporting America’s enemies?

I could dissect the whole article and reveal caldwell as a treasonous salotte plastique, like megyn kelly and the plastic liberal media. The one aforementioned paragraph, by caldwell,  should be plenty to completely discredit caldwell and yagoo”news”.

Caldwell continues with a claim that children could face deportation. What children? Those separated from their parents by sick and twisted obama? What children is caldwell referring to, those from south and central America, flown in by jet, paid for by Americans against their will? Which children, those that have taken funds from inner city children? To which children immigrants is caldwell referring that will be “deported”? Would a better word be, “re-united”, with their parents? Where are the parents of these so-called immigrant children when they are taken from their parents? Are these so-called children wards and puppets of the state? Why do democrats get puppet servants but republicans do not? Is it because of some hidden agenda that keeps republicans from kidnapping and exploiting children and military aged men, or is it because of a hidden dem/lib agenda to create a puppet slave nation, or both?

Where is the question, by caldwell, to bring in the morality of forcing expenses upon Americans already struggling? Where is caldwell even questioning the validity of a better method of helping other peoples of other nations?

Where is caldwell’s mind? What happened to her thought processes about alternative solutions that do not place Rule of Law subservient to dictatorial powers?

Where is caldwell’s head and conscience in anything in that article that floats lead on water by lies and fabrications?

There is absolutely nothing rational, honest, or caring in anything that pig caldwell has regurgitated. It reflects a “person”, caldwell, that has nothing rational, honest, or caring in her soul.

Why does she presume that under the Trump administration these poor, suffering separated children will suffer by being re-united with their parents? Why does this salotte plastique, caldwell, not mention the hundreds of thousands of inner city children separated from their dead parents and missing fathers? There are millions more suffering American children that this slob, caldwell, has purposely ignored.

What kind of scum, caldwell, goes on and on about fabricated injustices, fabricated enemies and challenges, and presumption of guilt for a president-elect that has done nothing, and made no overtures to do the same treasonous acts the bastard, deceptive president obama has already done, for eight LONG years?

Caldwell is not only scum and a salotte de tyrannie, she is mentally and morally reprehensible, and should not be writing anything that requires her politicized-to-sub-human-levels, opinion.

YAHOO”NEWS” REPORTED, NOVEMBER 6TH, 2016, If This Poll is Right Trump Can’t Win Florida – – or the Election”

Yahoonews reported, November 6, 2016, “If This Poll Is Right Trump Can’t Win Florida – – or the Election”.

With every headline and article I read, written by democrat party apologists or agents, or liberal media personnel, I am sometimes discouraged by the headline if not the actual news. I am clearly an anti-establishment supporter: the clintons being the most establishment entity in government today.

But I know, without exception now, that I always find discrepancies, contradictions and inconsistencies, if not outright lies and whacky fabrications, in every article or “NEWS” item published by any dem/lib.

Garver’s article, if I were to accept that he is relating some truth or fact, could be quite deflating. But he is simply regurgitating models and predictions, not actual polling.

Patience, my fellow American readers, I will make my case.

Furthermore, I dare not read an article from any source without some preponderance as to the truths I will find, naturally hoping to find parties I believe to be dishonest: have maybe, somehow, decided to be honest. Am I actually looking for truth? Yes. Do I find it in liberal media? You, dear readers, will have to read on and decide what is truth and what is not. To preface that I ask you, do you want to know the truth?

If I thought that voting for an avowed socialist, Bernie Sanders, for example, would be in the best interests of America and Americans, I would have been a staunch supporter. The impediment to that is that I know the history and proper application of the terms left-wing, right-wing, and volumes of related information. I understand tyranny and how it germinates and burgeons. I have studied the founding fathers’ efforts to keep America free of tyranny (by any name), and can see through the fraud of socialism. I have studied the writings and arguments for different parts of OUR Constitutional Republic, as presented to knowledgable Americans, in the days of breaking free of Britain.

I have studied the sources for the founding fathers’ insights, the ancient Greek city states. I have come to different conclusions from my contemporaries in a few areas, and theorized about many things. I have written articles for my arguments. Some of my commentaries can be found at earnwrite.com, author brent.

One of my claims and commentaries is that socialism is not a political system. It actually has characteristics of politics but nothing of the representative process. These things are different, you ask. Read on.

Socialism is a system of lying, cheating and plunder. It is an economic system subjected to and pushed by centralized political force: which is not representative power. Socialism does not remedy inequality of income and wealth. When one group is robbed to give to another there is always a cost, an inequality. There is no production from the middle man, people in government. 

Even middle men in business produce something. Middle-men typically provide a service of either delivering or marketing. What service do socialist politicians deliver, stealing from one to give to another? Who is served, besides the politician?

Socialism starts with a big lie, that government can produce something: equality.  Equality cannot be produced nor can it be achieved except when all are reduced to common denominators, poverty and ignorance.

Equality can never be achieved because some do more with the same amount of rsources. Both denominator and numerator must be controlled for equality, and it cannot be forced upon people to do less when brains expand ideas differently.

Struggling for existence in ignorance makes all men equal. Even that extremely low denominator does not make equality. Adaptability is the key to survival and growth. Socialism, the political process of centralizing power, wealth and initiative in the hands of a few self-appointed superiors, must destroy adaptability: initiative and capital. Capital comes in many forms and the socialists, the marxist democrats and bolshevik progressives know this. Capital is initiative, or labor and investment. Investment can be money or goods.

Being forced to compress and remain totally stifled upon ruler command, is close to equality. It is the total incapacity to survive, and that is what centralized dementocrat tyranny wants. The agents boast of equality, but refuse to explain the variables that must be destroyed: variables that cannot be wiped from the nature of man, any man or woman. To enforce socialism, marxism, utopia is the impossible dream, to eradicate mankind from man. Transforming people into beasts of burden is the only way. Ignorance, fear and instinctual responses such as sexualizing everything is how people turn their neighbors into beasts of burden. Who does that today?

It is the ignorance variable that makes all equal. A ruler that promises equality knows the task of forcing ignorance to the depth of animalism, is the continuing challenge and role he or she must take.

The lies and fraud that follow the big lie are designed to hide that first big lie, and move people along to accept tyranny and plunder, by many names that seem innocent. There is no innocence in taking from others by law. Frederick Bastiat referred to this as legal plunder.

Do we read to acquire information? Do we not all listen to the NEWS for information? Do we hear NEWS because we want to be deceived? This seemingly innocent statement should be qualified. It has been said we trust those most who lie to us best.

The headline, “If This Poll Is Right Trump Can’t Win Florida – – or the Election”, surely sparks some kind of emotion from anyone that reads it: for some elation, for others disappointment and even anger. This article, and articles like it, always inspire me to find the stink-bombs of fraud and deception.

Part of tyranny’s fraud and deception is manipulation. Surely, if you are a democrat supporter or a liberal, you are already discounting my words, even though I have barely stated anything against your beliefs or the democrat political machine, or in criticism of liberals manipulating behind the scenes.

I am certain I have stated something you will be able to use to excuse your information gathering quest. But if you miss the point, you miss much more than you can afford. If you refuse to read anything you miss out. If you want the gold you have to get right in the muck and mud, and dig. Neither gold nor truth jump at you and proclaim, ‘here I am’. Fool’s gold will do that and there is a reason fools seek fool’s gold in NEWS and truth.

Some dig for information to arm themselves for further deception. Some like to arm themselves with misinformation because they are afraid of truth. How can one be afraid of something he or she knows not? It is the darkness of dark, the darkness of ignorance, and the light of reality that give us cause to fear.

I hate green beans although I have never tasted them. How do I know I hate them? Is it because I have other information that tells me what I imagine they will taste like? From where did I get this other information, and is it correct? Can I be wrong? How could I possibly be right when green beans have a unique flavor, like all foods?

How can I, or anyone, be right in presumption without reading? How can I be right that I will not like what I fear to read because of the title? Is the title correct? Is the initial presentation of information correct or true? How could I or anyone know if I do not read the article, dissect it and compare the knowledge received with the claim(s) of the title?

The question to you, then, is, ‘what dreadful result of reading “opposing views” for information and truth do you imagine in your mind?’

What fear do I imagine when I read the title, “If This Poll Is Right Trump Can’t Win Florida – – or the Election”?

Am I afraid it is true?

As sentient beings we get overwhelmed with what we imagine we cannot sort through and understand. As a result of this seemingly overwhelming task, some people stick to the simple truths, or familiar biases that are not always true. The titles of so much of what we read or hear seem true but can truth actually be found in titles?

For example I can claim ‘math is easy’. Do you, dear mathematics student, now know math?

Trump will win. Do you now know it? 

Those who manipulate you want you to believe the simple titles because there is no substance to claims they make, and thus their work, if it can be called that, is done: or so they presume.

Those who profess and proclaim by titles and clichés, experience no embarrassment or ridicule. They become demagogues of superficial titles and headlines. They become their own sources of truth, by lies and fraud, all to hide the lack of substance. For example: explain to us the characteristics of democracy and how it applies to our representative system in America.

Have you, dear reader, ever heard a democrat or liberal explain it? To explain it would reveal the deception and fraud.

When the news reports a one or two sentence claim, it is a title, nothing more. The truth of any news is not found in the title, or the title-like news casts that give us one-line clichés and manipulative emotional blasting. The truth is found digging below the apparent NEWS, all of it, and getting in the muck and mud of substance.

The title, “If This Poll Is Right Trump Can’t Win Florida – – or the Election”, caused an emotional response for myself, as it was designed.

However, I have learned to not panic, and I did not. But, does it relate truth and reality? Can the author explain how Trump cannot win? Those who talk in circles of things others do not understand, and do not take time to explain the process, advantages and disadvantages, do not want intelligent followers.

Can I state a title with respect to the author of “If This Poll is Right Trump Cant Win Florida – – or the Election”? Here is my headline: Garver does not want anyone to think for themselves.

Can I explain that, or will you simply believe it? Why would you believe a title of one who tries to not explain by dwelling in the ethereal arena of misrepresented headlines?

Ah, but you do not know until you read and find the substance.

So the question comes to us, before reading any title or hearing any “title-like” news report or news cliché: what do you hope to gain by reading any news or any title? Will you investigate further or be manipulated by clichés and potentially false terms and/or words in titles? 

Another example: Read the headlines of political news reports. Titles and “reports” often have the words democracy and America in the same sentence. If you do not notice democracy and America in the same sentence or title, then search for one example of Constitutional Republic in a sentence with America. Do we assume, as a result, that America is a democracy? Some do. I never did believe it. I looked for myself. You can too, or just believe what you want. 

The initial statement of Garver’s article tries to set a presumption in the reader’s mind, if the reader has not heard opposing views or if the reader decides to accept the title because of the source, that a “poll” is a “poll” because a reporter reported it. Is that true?

Polls today, the day before the election and for the past two years have reported nothing but favorable wins and conditions for democrats.

And we can find opposing information, that will smother a few polls and any researcher woking for “truth”.

Does public education have opposing views? Is this where children learn? Garver’s is an article I would want to read for the NEWS value of it but I admit, my mind is tainted, biased, suspicious because of the absolute deception and fraud I have experienced, refuted and correct, by dem/libs and apologist liberal media. Even that, I acknowledge is a bias. But even a biased report can be dissected and truth extracted from it.

In Garver’s article I quickly found contradictions and poor reporting, as I knew I would,

But you, dear reader, may have your own bias that everything you receive from democrat/liberal sources is truthful, or you might find that it is not democrat or liberal sponsored and supportive.

You may believe polls are objective and accept that polls reveal truth, reporting just what is found in unbiased polling and questioning. At a glance, in any article, I can now find the duplicity of all democrat and liberal writers. I do not include “all” lightly.”

Now you, dear investigator, can journey with me through Garver’s  article and find truths and lies, if there be any. Will a truth cause you some emotional pain? Yes, but I can tell you that finding the truth and accepting one truth, and that one truth on its own merits, for what it really is, liberates the soul. Every step, every truth one finds is another nail pushed out of your coffin of slavery: ignorance.

Ignorance is slavery, for the ignorant, because there are those who use ignorance to manipulate others. Are you, dear fellow American, a fool, trusting others’ words without question or curiosity? How did that human trait become washed from your soul?

So, what is a poll? Do you, dear fellow American, understand every aspect and word of that “title”?

No. So few do. The ones who understand are the ones manipulating the results.

A poll is not 100 percent polling.

Like global warming, there are so few professionals involved, it would cause amazement, wonder and confusion, at how these so-called experts arrive at their conclusions and predictions, and fool us all.

Global warming has zero scientists, although democrats and liberals refer to the “global warming community”, as if it existed.

Find a scientist in the global warming community that has actually done a scientific experiment or taken measurements. There is nobody. How can one be a scientist if one does nothing scientific? How can one be a baseball player if one does nothing “baseball”?

Dig, for yourselves, and find the truth.

There are so few pollsters, the number is insignificant.

How many people, experts would we suspect are part of a “think tank”? What is a think tank?

A think tank is a handful of readers and writers that fabricate “information”, from an extremely limited amount of input, while they pretend to create scenarios from their superior intellect.

To sound intelligent and expert, they “spin”: a reference to spinning yarns, stories. “Pollsters” are think tanksters, they spin “intelligence” from an extremely limited number of people actually polled. Mostly what they do, is twist and fabricate stories that will be accepted after the fact of something sinister and hidden. Has any dem/lib mentioned that polling is mostly computer-generated predictions and models based on old data? Who does not want you to know that?

Like the global warming community, that uses models and computer-generated predictions, based on political remedies for apolitical fabrications, the think-tanksters/pollsters do the same.

Most of the “polling” is taken from biased models and think tanksters that are trying to create credibility for the inevitable incredulity.

The think tanksters/pollsters insert words, change meanings of words, and add contradictory words that shake one’s thoughts, and give the impression that the writers and “think tanksters” are intelligent. This a very few other tactics tricks millions every time.

Polling is a series of models: numbers and think-tanksters , fabricated interpretations. It could be biased but nobody would know until he or she studied polling, rhetoric (grammar) and looked at the questions think-tanksters ask. Have you done that?

Polling is like non-scientific, non-existent scientists in the non-existant global warming community. It is all done by models chasing political compliance for a fabricated fear.

A democrat party poll, is a biased fabrication of democrat/liberal opposition always making the opposing views lose. Look up a term, dialectic advancement, and you will know why democrats appear to lose, some time.

The polls are rigged and the ballot counting is rigged.

Is that a simple, manipulative title? Sure, until you check it out.

I spend more time reading opposing “NEWS” than conservative or republican/republic NEWS. What trashing can I do to truth? What critique do I have with truth without fabrication and deception? None, so I cannot “bash” conservative, historically-correct truth.

For example, America was founded as a democracy. NO. False.

America was founded as a Constitutional Republic. Oh, is that true? Is it important to know? Why would it be important to know?

Are the characteristics of democracy and Constitutional Republic different, and is one better than the other? What would make one better than the other? If we qualify the question with, ‘for who is either system better, and how’, we might be getting closer to some reality.

Who would, in the first place, not want Americans to know the truth of whether America was founded as a democracy or a Constitutional Republic? Who mentions “democracy” continually in their titles? Do constitutional supporters mention democracy in their titles? Do conservatives mention democracy in the same sentences as America? No. The two simply do not go together and do not belong in the same sentence or concept together. Why?

What truth or truths are you failing to learn and know by not being told America was founded as a Constitutional Republic?

What truth or truths do you not learn or know as a result of believing the title, “If This Poll Is Right Trump Can’t Win Florida – – or the Election”?

Before we begin to know that, we must dissect the title. You, however, must determine if you will accept truth when you find it. If you will not then you must realize you are rejecting truth: fact that will benefit yourself, and those around you. That is quite a responsibility.

It is important to know that once you have internalized truth it is not difficult to maintain. Once you know a truth you do not have to relearn it. Compared to lying, and trying to make connections of lies that surely must follow, truth is liberating. Furthermore a truth learned releases other truths from the bondage of fear.

In this case, I boldly state, elections are rigged always in favor of the democrat party. Mistakes would be made in favor of all parties involved, but that is not the case for the innumerable mistakes made in the 2016 election, and prior elections.

The youtube videos abound in the thousands. Secret interviews, explanations, redefining terms and words as their original intents and meanings, and innumerable sites and expose´s can be found and you will learn

I cannot even begin to list them.

But know this, Garver makes no references to anything that will educate you, my dear fellow citizen.

Please. Dear fellow American, do an internet search for black box vote. Check out Hillary meltdown. Anne Coulter has some great interviews and makes super points. Look up voter fraud, Petition Project.

How about Huma Abedin connections to Islam? Check out Fast and Furious gun running, Benghazi interviews, Trey Gowdy, Jason Chaffetz.

Look in the NEWS and find something, and research it until you have the truth. You will know truth. When you find a series of statements and apparent truths, and they connect easily, you have truth.

For example, We have a Bill of Rights. WE live in a Constitutional Republic system of self governance. Are the two connected and can they stand on their own?

Why do We, Americans, have a Bill of Rights? Do all democracies have a Bill of Rights? Would it surprise you to know that there is no such thing as a Bill of Rights anywhere in the world except in America? A Bill of Rights, is unique to OUR Constitutional Republic. Is someone trying to turn your, OUR Constitutional Republic into a democracy, with no individual rights? Who would do such a dastardly thing? Which rights will you, my fellow citizen, voluntarily surrender, Freedom of Speech, Freedom of Religion, Freedom of self-determination, Freedom of commerce, ownership, presumption of innocence?

Find the truths you want. Do it now before you vote for tyranny. You had better ask, and you had better want to know, ‘which party is tyranny’? You had better know because if you make a mistake the losses you wish on others, history shows irrefutably, will either enslave or kill YOU! Search for and boldly face whatever fear this “title” has caused you, and be free.

REGARDING YAHOO”NEWS” AP ARTICLE OF NOVEMBER 8, 2014, “Dispute erupts during Whitehouse luncheon”

REGARDING YAHOO!”NEWS” AP article, “Dispute erupts during White House luncheon”, Saturday November 8th, 2014.

Who are these dippy bitches, Nedra Pickler and Erica Werner who, together, fabricated typical communist propaganda cleverly disguised as AP “NEWS”?

These two semi-intelligent dogs should be ashamed of themselves for passing off such manipulative, classical conditioning. The garbage writers have written another garbage article directed at the ignorant masses and those that want something for nothing. Do not forget: those that get something for nothing do it at the expense of those that give something and get nothing. How fair and just is that?

Just the title of the article is a fraud heaped upon Americans by tyranny-wing, lying leftist media. The issue is NOT immigration. Immigration is a legal application, processed and officiated by those We, the People assign to act in OUR stead. Vagrants, uneducated masses incapable of contributing to their own country, non-English speaking criminals and cowards, and cheats and thieves stealing across OUR borders and illegally garnering control of OUR LIMITED resources is not “Immigration”.

How does this liberal la-la-land media see itself as anything even closely related to human when the lies and fraud that diminish OUR lives and standards of living are thrashed with every pseudo news article they fabricate?

Look at the words of the title, “Dispute erupts during Whitehouse luncheon”. What does disrupt mean and who did the disrupting? No doubt it was a libbyral trying to exert power in opposition to the will of Americans. Who could that have been? Was it the House of Representatives doing the disrupting? If it had been the the House, AP “writers” would have made much more of an attack on republicans.

But wait, there is more to ponder. Why do commie/libbyral “writers” always forget to accurately describe who wants what? When the House of Representatives represents the majority, it is, undeniably, We, the People that want what is poorly described by AP/libbyral/commie “writers” that purposely try to deflect from truth.

When leaders of the party in the majority meet with a president it is NOT on the president’s terms, but that is what the commie/libbyral AP “writers” are trying to entrench in the minds of Americans. Why do the commie/libbyral “writers”, Nedra and Erica, not tell the real story? They can’t, they are propaganda at work.

The real story is We, the People, in the legitimate majority, represented by constituency and further represented by republican House of Representative leaders, are demanding that the bastard, commie president do OUR will. There will be consequences. The commie whores, Nedra and Erica, will feel the wrath one day of We, the People, AMERICA EN TOTO, the legitimate voice for all of America.

Why would Nedra and Erica not report the truth, that Obama refused to execute the oath of his office and refused the legitimate authority of We, the People.

When the majority speaks it speaks for all Americans. That is how this country operates, and it functions well when all parties accept that the majority does rule. When democ-rats, even though they cheat and steal, are in power, republicans exert a degree of self control accepting the majority, but the democ-rats never respect the will of the majority. Democ-rats don’t even respect the wishes of the majority when it is a democrat-leaning majority. Did Jimmy boy Matheson make any effort to repeal the (un)Affordable (un)Care Act when he clearly had instructions from the people of the fourth Utah District to do that? NO, the bastard refused to listen to We, the People, placing libbyral/commie dogma and a dictator above the will of We, the People.

I had a slim hope that Mrs. Matheson would come clean and reveal the methods of election fraud. She knows.

Women who join up with corrupt politicos (those of the democ-rat party) know their spouses are in league with corruption and fraud, and they care not as long as they get their popularity and big bucks!

Nedra and Erica need to go back to kindergarten and start with basic principles. Nedra and Erica need to go back to kindergarten for those first steps of honesty and integrity they refused to learn, and learn them. Their self-serving, self-aggrandizing child-ids need to be controlled by themselves. They need to learn the first lesson of honesty by standing in the corner with the other kindergarten children for lying

Notice there are two pictures, both of Barack, muslim brotherhood, Obama speaking and everyone else listening. WHY? Why are We, the People not speaking? Why is that bastard dictator Obama not listening?

Why does the commie/libbyral media continually fabricate that which is wrong, illegitimate and unethical while also minimizing that which is right and good for America?