FORECAST FOR JUNE 4TH 2021, SALT LAKE CITY, PREDICTING “NEAR RECORD HIGHS”

FORECAST FOR JUNE 4TH 2021, SALT LAKE CITY, PREDICTING “NEAR RECORD HIGHS”

June 3rd, 2021, predicting near record temperatures for June 4th, 2021.

The “NEWS” was that tomorrow’s forecast could produce record breaking highs. Part of the forecast predicted that June 4th could also be the earliest SLC area would hit triple digit highs.  Did not happen. “They” tried to make it appear that 100 was reached but you must look at the reality.

At 5:00 PM temperatures start to drop. Seldom do temperatures rise after 5:00 PM, if ever. The temperature stayed at 98 degrees for hours, even an hour after 5:00 PM, then suddenly it bolted to 100 degrees, like it was thinking it needed to respond to a command.

If you doubt this then you have no idea what science is, partially because you have never exercised it.

Science is change. If you have not paid attention, or scrutinized past events and patterns, you will not only be oblivious to reality and science, but you will remain part of the truly, ignorant masses. Everybody gets messages on their phone about temperatures, at any given moment. From where do these arrive? Do these temperatures come from the centralized (bad sign) official source? What is the official source? Have you thought about that? No? Do you know the difference between intellect and intelligence? Do you know what deductive reason is? No? Then do not question my observations.

It is all part of global hoaxing, warming, that is not warming. Please, learn scientific methodology and find scientific methodology, even just one characteristic of it, in any of the so-called climate sites.

Go to my section of CLIMATE CHANGE/GLOBAL WARMING and read, learn.

MORE REGARDING MY 3/3/18 COMMENTARY, “OCEAN FLOOR SINKING”

More regarding my commentary of 3/2/18, “Ocean floor sinking”

I had written and published a commentary refuting the moronic idea that the ocean floor is sinking. It occurred to me that I missed a major point. If the ocean floor is sinking, dropping, where is it going? That was a part of my original commentary, but there is another related point to consider.

If the ocean floor is sinking, dropping “down”, from what relative point is it dropping? There must be a measurement and comparison of pre-test conditions and post test: science.

Is the ocean floor sinking with respect to the land, the shores around the world? If it is, then water is not rising. If the ocean floor is sinking, then the ocean water level at the shoreline is dropping, not rising.

Where is the benchmark, for measuring such changes in elevations and depths? Non-existent? Hmmm, do the dem/lib dimwits even know what a benchmark is? Not very science-ish, is it?

Or, the ocean floor is sinking and water is rising, keeping the level with respect to the land, around the world, the same, constant. The dumb bolshevik manipulators of reality make neither claim. They just fabricate and lie. Who went to the ocean floor and measured the depth, and from where?

Do you see, that I almost made the argument for the climate-hoaxers by stating the water levels have remained the same, but it is because the volume of water has increased. The dementocrats and la-la-land liberals, spewing grotesque globalist/bolsheievik fraud, do not have the capacity for intellectual honesty or study. What a bunch of illiterate, ignorant boneheads.

Do you see how stupid dem/lib, progressive/bolshevik, unsubstantiated headline claims are?

It is intellect that prompts questions, not lock-step, droning, liberal news and dementocracy.

Think! Ask questions, why…

PART 2: THE BURDEN OF PROOF IN CLIMATE CHANGE, GLOBAL WARMING, “SCIENCE”

Original publication on SLC Craigslist, June 15, 2016, in response to a post by Utardia, a “writer”, regurgitator of marxist/liberal climate dogma and deception.

Part two, applying science to compare and contrast a democracy versus a constitutional republic.

Do we need to define “rational”?

A witness to anything helps clarify and also helps debunk. Clarity, truth is the goal.

When we look at the Constitution and the Amendments we find standard for many things.

A standard establishes common communication. Standards in science, must also be established otherwise we have no comparisons, no observations, and nothing obvious. Without the obvious and irrefutable, the burden of proof of science is not met, and the doubt rules.

It must be so because everything at any given point is based upon and operates around established truths: truths that for the moment seem to explain and predict.

Real science does not ask people to adjust to something not proved or unreal. Science does not, for example, ask people to prepare for dragon fire that does not exist, and the same is prevalent in all science, including unsubstantiated, standard-less global hoaxing.

Why do We, the People, have a Bill of Rights? Is the Bill of Rights for government? Government is a thing. It is a thing, like a tool, used by We, the People. Government, in America, a Constitutional Republic, is not a tool for politicians to use. The Bill of Rights establishes, quite clearly, that the amendments require burdensome effort to change. OUR traditions and OUR working laws, today, now, cannot be changed without due proof of necessity.

The burden of proof is that law requires authority; authority granted by We, the People, NOT government, to prove need.

Take the right to be presumed innocent before the law. This simple amendment: this one in particular, establishes that the individual is supreme. The Rights in the Bill of Rights, are for the individual, not a conglomerate government collective of rulers.

The burden of proof, wherein guilt must be proved without doubt, is what sets every single person in America in the same status before the law. So none, in any position, can suppress the law, and create a slave, or a slave class by extortion of law.

The burden of proof applies in all things in a free society.

Realistically, there are few truly free societies in the whole history of the world, but we can see two from which We, the People, can draw experience and guidance.

The Magna Carta, an Anglo origination in 1215 England, was the beginning of a freedom the world had never seen. It was a freedom for all peoples, not just a political class. In fact it was designed to oppose and control a political class.

You could call monarchy, dictatorship, and oligarchy, a political class. No matter what the pretentious name, a political class is a ravaging organization exploiting, using, and killing slaves itself, themselves, create.

We, in America have not fallen into slavery. Slavery has been thrust upon us. Slavery was created by diabolical, psychopathic “people”. Every single democrat politico in America, is a psychopathic monarchist. Heavy claim, but to actually join the democrat party one must surely know the democrat party is involved in a push for dictatorial oligarchy. Nobody falls into slavery by default. Nobody falls into a position of being a slave owner or master, by mistake either.

The second I know I have ill-gotten gains, taken by force or legal force, is the second I know I have unjustly profited by someone’s efforts. That is theft: it is slavery.

The burden of proof in science, is no different. It is meant to prove beyond doubt, that something is true.

How can one be sure of truth if it is not proven beyond doubt? The foundation for rationality is truth beyond doubt.

A scientist is required to make a claim of suspected truth.

I believe, for example, that coffee makes one jittery. I make a claim, called a thesis or hypothesis. A hundred, a thousand people can refute my claim, and do so rationally. All they have to say, is they don’t believe it. Their opinion is valid as opinion. A million people can refute my claim and my claim is nothing, yet.

If I were to take these million people, subject half of them to drinking one cup of coffee in the morning, while half get no coffee, and then I measure and quantify the observations, collecting them into obvious results, then I have exercised scientific methodology.

In this case where utardia claims I need to provide proof when it is he/her/it that makes the challenge against established science, utardia misses the establishment of reality, as usual, and thus remains in a state of suspended reality, refusing to change to the obvious.

I am not required to bend to fantasy while already living in established reality.

But this is the fraud the dem/lib/progressives continually try to ram down Conservative America’s throat.

I have no burden to believe a single thing utardia or any of the global hoaxers, I mean warmers, claim until I see rational measurements, results taken from the obvious and irrefutable.

We have no results of anything until something is done to produce results. Making a model does not qualify. Making predictions without measurements does not qualify.

I can claim europeans have large noses. How do I measure large? Is “large” a comparative? If so, what is the standard upon which I decide to employ? Is my standard rational, or noticeable, measurable?

If I claim europeans have large noses, is it logical I describe how much bigger they are? Is it logical and fair that I describe bigger? Is bigger longer, wider, taller, more sunk in the head?

The burden of proof is all mine.

All the sophist pretenses by dem/libs, utardia sub-intelligent dog, for example, pretending to be smart, does not provide a shred of evidence and certainly meets no burden of proof, or even a simple claim or theory to precede finding and proving the hopeful obvious. The dem/libs have never made it to the first stages of science: theory, hypothesis and intelligent claim.

Who are the dem/libs trying to deceive?

THE BURDEN OF PROOF IN CLIMATE CHANGE, GLOBAL WARMING, “SCIENCE”

Original publication on SLC Craigslist, June 15, 2016, in response to a post by Utardia, a “writer”, regurgitator of marxist/liberal climate dogma.

The burden of scientific proof rests with the prosecution. There is two basic results of science: proving a theory or hypothesis, or failing to prove a theory or hypothesis.

Utardia, that dimwit lying crap-superstar, claims I need to provide proof. Is that proof of a negative? Is that proof that where I stand exists?

A tradition is immovable until it is movable, by something new, and obvious. Global hoaxing, I mean warming, is magnificently NOT obvious, except to dictatorial goons making big bucks off others’ fears, and obvious to bogus scientists extrapolating something from clearly NOTHING. When I say nothing I mean no data, no pre-test, no post test, no control group, no measurements, but lots of polluting and “reinterpreting” standard, immovable data.

It is all a fraud, a lie based on imaginary demons and fire breathing dragons, heating up the world. Where are the dragons other than the nether reaches of political scientists’ ever-augmenting ethereal interpretations of imaginary science from cosmological shock troops?

I might add that all those innumerable “climate scientists” do not exist. There are writers galore, political puppets who quote each others’ papers and stories of studies.

“The oceans will rise by 20 feet by the year 2015”, 144,000 Witnesses of Jehovah will be taken heavenward in 1918, I mean 1933, I mean 1975, I mean 1999, I mean okay who is this Jehovah guy”? “The climate system will kill millions by 2012”. Pictures of moose dying, deserts and dead fish on the shores all cause world-wide stench by 2010”. Obama will turn back the rise of the oceans by shear will power.

Some will argue he did it. Then why do we need anything else? Why do we need political exertion, taxation and subservience to the democrat party and liberals when obama can do it all?

Come on people, the oceans have not risen, temperatures have dropped. It is colder today, it cools off at night, and summers are shorter. Fewer people die from heat waves today than they did 20, 30 and 40 years ago.

We stand on solid ground of tradition. Somebody designed a thermometer well over a century ago, and that same thermometer is the standard.

What is the standard?

Water boils at 212 degrees at sea level, and freezes at 32 degrees. There is no change in that. That is the standard. Who will challenge that? Who would even think that this fact is not one of the world’s most reliable templates? 

Why do global hoaxers, I mean warmers, even attempt to change these standards?

We can always make new thermometers at the boiling point, and and it is still the standard because it is still the boiling point and we design and change OURSELVES to that fact.

Global hoaxers, I mean warmers, have been trying to change We, the People, and reality to their inconsistent and shifting predictions. They have no standards because they are sloppy, pretentious, anti-science comic-cons. Where is the data?

Data is not data unless it has a standard and a means of measuring preconditions and new, or changing conditions. This is science, the beginning of science.

How do we measure time? We measure it by change. We make a 24 hour day of a time frame between sunrise and another sunrise. We don’t dictate that we want 24 hours in a day, and make the planet rotate different. But that is the approach global hoaxers, I mean warmers, have taken.

We do not look at the sunrise and try to slow it down so we can have 25 hour days. That is ludicrous. It borders on insanity if not full blown lunacy. But that is what global hoaxers, I mean warmers, are trying to do with no data, no pre-test, no post-test, no measurements, and no sea level markers. They have not even tried to present this simple experiment because it is a failure every time.

Surely, somewhere along the way, maybe 10 years ago, maybe 20 or 30 years ago, someone, a real scientist, must have surely stuck a stick in the water and measured ocean levels regularly to show ocean-level rise. Why has no scientist presented this data? Would this data be irrefutable if it could be found to show a rise in ocean levels? Absolutely, and I would concur. But there is not one single reference to a stick in a rock anywhere? Absolutely nothing! NOAA, for example, has absolutely nothing that represents a stick in a rock, or anything an intellect could imagine and design to measure change.

So, I ask, are oceans rising? Surely it must be obama that stopped the rise, with just his word.

How much did it rise before he made the promise? ZERO! That was a  pretty safe bet for him, was it not.

It must be zero, otherwise dem/lib politico/scientists would have shown us. NOTHING!

The burden of proof is always on the upstarts, the new science, the new theories and hypotheses.

I am a cop, standing in the middle of the street, directing traffic. Who will argue that traffic flows at my standard, stable, already existing presence?

It takes a pre-test to assert the variables for the study, and it takes measurements of some sorts (maybe time lapse of driver response due to traffic officer’s directions, as compared to time lapse when traffic officer is not present).

You see, dear reader, the burden of proof is not only on the new science, or new theory or new hypothesis to show a change, but it is a heavy burden to first show the standards by which change will be measured and then presented as illuminating.

There is nothing obvious in dem/lib global hoaxing, I mean warming, except the raging lunacy of pseudo-scientists fabricating fear and catastrophe from lunatics’ imaginations, all done for money.

It is not my burden to provide truth to an existing science. The burden of proof, in science and almost everything, lies solely with the party making new claims or challenging established thought and tradition. The burden of proof lies with those trying to show change. Science is change, measurable change. If it is not measured there is no data, no measurable change and, hence, no science.

Global hoaxing, I mean warming, is the new claim of change, without a shred or attempt to show the change.

I see it this way. When I was a boy, some days when I would arrive at home after school I would walk in the door and smell baking. Imagine I walked in the house, and my mother says, “do you smell that?” Smell what, I ask. “The baking bread, she replies.” No.

“Well, I smell it and it is good”, she claims. Hmmm I do not smell anything.

“No matter”, she says, “will you wash the bread pans please?”

What bread pans? “The ones I baked the bread with”, she she says.

Ok, I guess you see bread pans.

“Of course I do”, she emphatically states, “right there on the counter by the sink.”

Okay, I believe you. Here I am, washing bread pans.

When I am finished washing imaginary bread pans, I sit at the kitchen table and my mother then places an empty plate before me and says, “enjoy the freshly baked bread”.

Okay mom.

In this anecdote, would you think my mother had lost something? Why do global hoaxers try the same with you and I? Are they insane or dishonest?

Global hoaxing, I mean warming, has the burden of proof, and that is why it fails so miserably. There is not even an attempt to provide pre-test conditions, post-test, hypothesis. My mother could have placed store-bought bread on plate, and tried to convince me she had baked it. Without the pre-test conditions: aroma of freshly baked bread, used bread pans and flour on the counter, I am not convinced. The global hoaxing, I mean warming, community, that does not exist except in papers by writers, tries the same. They show nothing with which a comparison, or change can be made.

I come home from school occasionally to the smell of freshly baked brread, and that is a change from the day before, and many days prior. Where is the change in the global hoaxing, I mean warming, claims?

Do we remember our science projects in grade school? The lab paper had a section for observation.

Today’s global hoaxers, I mean warmers, cannot even present “observations”. They make all kinds of claims and protests. Well, they try to present observations but any so-called observations I have investigated are always observations of something else, they claim is connected to itself. They present fear, based upon imaginary dragons fabricated for pseudo-scientists’ financial gain; fabricated by monster-imagining writers.

After the fact observations are nothing if there is no pre-fact observations. The global hoaxers never provide pre-test observations, only claims.

Where are the observations, measurements, standard by which change can be observed?

How can global hoaxers, I mean warmers, make observations without anything to observe, and how can they draw conclusions without anything to observe taken from nothing presented? There is an incredible lack of connection in all this global hoaxing “concluding” without establishing and observing.

Did the morons, for example, observe dying polar bears? Where?

Did the boneheads observe a rise in the sea level of the stick in the rock on the shore? Did the rock move? Did the boneheads move the rock? Who would do such a grievous assault on science, fact and truth itself? Liars, with a political motive. Welcome to global hoaxing!

It is not my responsibility to prove another’s theory wrong, it is the party challenging established thought and tradition that is responsible for proving truth and credibility of his or her claims and theories. Until he or she provides data, measurements, clinical and or laboratory work, the theories remain theories.

The change of scientific belief is not a fact until it is actually factual. All the global hoaxers have is fear, fabrication, and quoting other’s fears and fabrications: all for money.

The NOAA site is a fantasy of global hoaxers, I mean warmers, continually augmenting fear from fear, and from third party fear and fabrication. It is easy to see when they start talking in circles.

Science is proved, often, when scientists and the free market are convinced. I have used the invention of the rifle as an example.

When rifling was first theorized and explained, denying a better flight by a rifled bullet compared to a musket ball was accepted. That is science. After obvious proofs and evidence: observations of rifle accuracy compared with musket accuracy, denying rifles provide a better, more accurate flight, was considered rifling denial. The deniers did not last long. They were killed in the battle lines because they refused to adapt to the science: the proof by observing pre-test and post-test. They refused to change their views to fact and reality.

It is logic retardation that dimwit utardia tries to present nothing to the public as a rational argument. Global hoaxing presents observation-less observations: unsubstantiated claims.

Again, where are the observations? Where are the obvious results, of something, anything, even attempts to lie or deceive?

We are not asking for fear mongering, predictions, models or quotes from others without the necessary facets of science. We want observations and the obvious, nothing else will do. We want IRREFUTABLE science.

WE HAVE BEEN DECEIVED IN EVERYTHING

We have been deceived in everything.

Today, April 16 2020, like many other days, before going outside I looked at the temperature on my phone. Currently, at 9:45 AM, it reads 37 degrees. I wondered how it could be snowing outside.

I received a notification on my phone that FOX NEWS was interviewing Kellyanne Conway, a Trump advisor.

The interview began with Bill De Blasio, Mayor of New York City, explaining, “If we act the wrong way, jump too soon, then we could see a resurgence…so we get one chance to get it right.”

Is this a political message or a pseudo-science democrat party fabrication? Who says we only get one chance?

Do we dare trust politicians who have used models and modelers who have gotten nothing right?

Fauci was involved with HIV/AIDS when it began. Still no vaccine, no cure, just treatment. He has never been good at his job and now Trump trusts this buffoon and all the other modelers brought over from global hoaxing?

De Blasio is not his name. He is of German descent. He changed his name to deceive New Yorkers.

What an assault on truth. I cannot reveal my sources, sorry, peoples’ lives and jobs are at stake, but covid does not exist in epidemic and certainly not pandemic, degrees. I know of two nurses in different cities that told me they are under instruction, command to report anything as covid-19 that has similar signs and symptoms as the so-called covid. They re forced to report everything that slightly resembles covid-19 signs and symptoms, even when tests show negative. That is one huge fraud.

De Blasio, the Cuomo morons, Utah gov herbie stalin, and others are part of the hoax. I have wondered about Trump since he took office.

De Blasio openly lied about many things in that 15 second clip. Who is “we”? Is he talking about the medical profession and politicos who have worked so hard to deceive Americans?

We have been classically conditioned to believe that some professions are above others, above the regular working “taxpayers” (how I hate that commie/bolshevik term), and that we should give our unreserved, irrepressible love and support to the medical profession, because they ravage America and kill so efficiently.

CNBC, February 22, 2018 reported the third leading cause of death in the United States is medical error.

https://www.cnbc.com/2018/02/22/medical-errors-third-leading-cause-of-death-in-america.html

Do doctors and medicos know this? Do nurses offer a caveat, disclaimer or warning when people step into the hospital? Are some nurses dishonest? No, heavens no. The medical profession is absolute. The medical profession is not run by the pharmaceutical companies, right Bernie Sanders, democrats?

Democrats attack corporations especially pharmaceutical (evil) corporations for the fraud and ravaging heaped upon America. True or fabricated by the bolshevik democrat party and liberals, it matters not that they attack to destroy everything that does not fit their goal of world domination through centralized government control.

It can be said I took a stab at the dem/libs, and it is true, but it was done to show the near absolute compliant forced ideological oppression of the ignorant democrat party masses.

The democrats know pharmakaia, the pharmaceutical companies, are rotten to the core and now, even now, they defer to the ravaging, dishonesty and lying of big pharma, during this fabricated crisis. Where is the famed democrat and liberal sense of indignation and distrust for covid-19 as an inherent evil of an evil corporations, as a spawn of big pharma?

Are democrats so dronish they follow their leaders in switching ideologies at the drop of a face mask?

To believe a corrupt medical profession, advising political appointees; political agents, in effect, who report from a pharmaceutical perspective of deception, on any aspect of this ruse, is insanity.

There is no way the whole chain of command can suddenly be honest.

This is like the story of the frog and the scorpion.

The scorpion asks the frog for a ride across the pond. The frog replies, ‘Are you crazy,? You will sting me.” The scorpion reassures the frog it really is not in his interest to sting the frog because it, along with the frog, would drown. The frog, obliges and the scorpion stings the frog when they are almost to the shore. As they both drown the frog asks the scorpion, ‘Why did you do that? Why did you kill both of us?’

The scorpion’s reply, I am a scorpion, it is what I do. You knew I was a scorpion. did you think I was not going to be a scorpion thoughout?’

You see, the scorpion is a scorpion and the scorpion cannot help but be a scorpion. The scorpion is an incorrigible scorpion, like liars are liars.

The medical profession, a part of pharma, cannot help but be agents for pharma, so lies are part of the medical profession because they are part of the big dirty, corrupt lying pharmaceutical government-corporate conglomerate. Pharma cannot help itself. Like the scorpion it lies because it cannot stop from being a lying industry. The medical industry, being a part of it, cannot stop itself from being itself, and constantly deceive and lie as well.

So, why do we believe this covid scare has any integrity, especially when it derives from a creation of two well known lying sources?

Read some of my posts regarding my brushes with dangerously stupid doctors.

There is no way there is not lying at some level in all this chain of political doctoring. I would estimate there is gross deception at most levels and slight deception in the rest: deception through and through.

“How reality based is May 1st Kelyanne?”, asked the reporter.

Conway replied, “For some places it certainly can be a reality, if testing is available, if your infection rates are low, your death rates are low, if low hospital capacity is there, including ventilators and medical personnel beds, beds in the ICU. All that is taken into account because the President has made…”

The President has made numerous assumptions from liars in big pharma and the failed CDC, or Trump is part of the deceptive seizing of control over everyone.

Conway’s answer would be more correct if she injected the variable of dishonesty pharma and medicos cannot help but repeat.

Her answer would read, ‘For some places, but not really, if testing is available and the professionals don’t lie  and hospital administrations don’t lie; if your infection rates are not lies or fraudulent under fear of being fired; your death rates due to heart failure, diabetes, “flu” signs and symptoms, influenza, are not reported as the real causes; if hospitals are allowed to transform units to serve the needs of the ill, instead of laying off staff in other care units; if low hospital capacity means cool photo opportunities and propaganda pictures are good; if low hospital capacity can be hidden as a reality, if low hospital capacity can be underreported or not reported at all, then we can certainly let non-victims of covid-19 media melee live their lives…..

I could go on and on.

Democrats should surely believe this because the attacks on Trump from dem/libs for three years, is thatTrump is not qualified or he is absolutely corrupt. Suddenly, to democrat party supporters, Trump has credibility. Why? Is it because the media is giving credibility to the lying medicos and CDC losers-at-every-challenge?

I am speculating regarding where and who. The reality is the medical professionals are liars because they are part of a big conglomerate deception. So, all the conditions Conway lists are inapplicable because the numbers are dead wrong fabrications from an incorrigible source: big pharma, medical industry and government losers.

There is no reality to anything coming from the media regurgitating lies from sources everyone knows are ravaging liars. How many people have been killed in the last 20 years by medico error, millions?

20,000 deaths due to covid is a drop in the bucket compared with medical error deaths. If pharma and medicos care not for the millions who have died, what makes anyone, including lying loser liberal media, think they care for the lives they are taking now? 

We are deceived, blatantly lied to about global warming. How is it possible that it snows when it is 37 degrees?

Again, only to the naiive and trusting drones do these two signs of totalitarianism seem disconnected. To those who intend to rule and “cleanse” “their” earth, these are connected because they made it so.

Last night, April 15th, I stepped outside and discovered it was colder than I thought. I went back into the house and looked at my phone. The weather report said it was 50 degrees. I walked over to my window where there is a thermometer and read it at 45 degrees. I took out a thermometer and walked outside away from the house and vehicles, and set it on a tree stump, the back insulated from the stump with a dry cloth.

When I looked ten minutes later the thermometer read 45 degrees.

Why are we being lied to about weather? Who is doing it?

Remember people who lie have to lie to cover something they cannot report or state with surety of truth.

Is it all just a mistake. One day last year it snowed in Murray at 39 degrees.

Has snow changed? If so, why has it not been studied, investigated and reported? No conclusions are forthcoming. Maybe there are no conclusions because the conclusions do not support the political agenda of global warming and apocalyptic meltdown.

Covid sure helps distract from this but by the summer’s end, mid August, the global hoaxers will claim this has been the warmest year on record, for 10 years in a row, now. Morons, killing people.

HOW DOES ONE EXPLAIN THE EXTREMELY COLD 2020 WINTER AND UNUSUALLY COLD MONTH OF MARCH?

HOW DOES ONE EXPLAIN THE EXTREMELY COLD 2020 WINTER AND UNUSUALLY COLD MONTH OF MARCH?

How does one explain the extremely cold winter of 2020 and unusually cold month of March?

I call it Covid-19 distraction. Is anybody talking about oceans rising when the so-called extreme heat is gone and the cold makes the ocean level drop? It doesn’t actually do that, nobody has shown how silly climate-change hoaxing observations connect to unobserved causes.

How do dem/libs explain this unusually, very long cold spell? Covid-19, distraction. Is anybody talking about record high temperatures when we have had years of declining average temperatures, and this spring is the coldest we have experienced in decades? The average daily highs for every day in March were 10 to 20 degrees below average. Nobody has shown how silly climate change observations connect to never shown claims of effects.

How do some people explain the quiet, almost non-existent claims that we, the human race and the world have only 7 years to reverse this “heat” and climate change? Covid-19, distraction from reality.

To most people politics is not involved in everything. Most people cannot accept that there are people who will kill, slaughter, lie cheat and steal for gain. Politicians, the democrats in Congress, exploited a politically-fabricated situation and added a fat juicy raise for themselves and their minions, the unelected, non-governmental agencies and democrat/liberal/progressive institutions the democrats need to feed to stay in power.

Politicians connect all these issues and fools refuse to see how one seemingly unrelated distraction is actually the effect of a different cause from the same source.

Again, it is all politics.

Covid-19 does not exist except where it has been reported and effects of different causes have been used.

Governor Cuomo and “fredo”, his mentally deranged, goofy brother reporter suddenly started telling the truth?

Liars lie, they always lie.

There are numerous links in reporting cause of death.

When a person goes into an emergency waiting room and fills out forms there is a lull, a wait. S person in very difficult situations would be seen as in dire need and rushed to care. A person with a gunshot wound, for example, bleeding, potentially close to passing, is observed and rushed. Covid-19 “sufferers” are not seen in emergency rooms as dire need cases. The “victim” fills out forms and waits, unless of course breathing is difficult, dire need potential of dying.

A wait ensues if there are cases ahead. Eventually a doctor sees the patient but if not in emergency surgery the doctor follows protocol. Asks questions, checks lymph nodes, looks in eyes, ears, throat, checks temperature (usually nurse does that) and prescribes a “cold” remedy. The case is then reviewed and assumed Covid because the doctors are instructed, in many states and regions, to “play it safe”. Play iy safe presumptions are lazy ways of claiming overload and a political agenda. To politicians all things, all issues and calamities are connected. They are connected by politicians’ lies. But, not all politicians lie and see connections. We call these few politicians, representatives.

The third link is follow up. So many have died of covid-19, the claims report, but again, there is never a link shown and the fact is usually just a claim. Have the 8,000 or so deaths, due to covid-19, been proven as a result of covid-19, by autopsy?

The fourth link, hospitalization just in case, just to observe, and assume it is covid-19. LIES presented as physical reality, therefore presented as truth of another infection. LIES, tricks by liars.

All death is by cardiac arrest. Pneumonia causes constricted oxygen flow, and the brain and heart die. The brain can die and the body survive, if the heart keeps pumping. Covid-19 does not cause anything that makes cardia arrest. Covid-19, a ghost virus, is said to cause flu-like symptoms, which means it is a flu. A person who shows signs of carina arrest, and then has a heart stoppage, is actually in cardiac arrest. It is not kidney failure.

How many people in New York city, for example, have not died of flu because it is presumed, by a dishonest politician and his corrupt brother reporter, at a fake news agency, both “working” together (Cuomo brothers) to create an effect they cannot show is actual and cannot show is a result of the cause a handful claim exists?

The CDC can throw a picture of a “virus” and claim it is anything. Who knows the difference? Are CDC scientists like global hoaxing scientists? Maybe they are the same people who present observations and show no connection to an effect they claim exists?

Are people actually dying of this ghost-virus covid-19? No.

Quo bono? Always look for crime where someone benefits. Politicians have America in lock-down, destroying our lives and pursuit of happiness, and they gain, by writing fat raises for themselves and their supporters: fake representative processes they feign.

Global warming pre and post test measurements and data. Written 6/21/16

Global warming pre and post test measurements and data.
A real scientist would look at NOAA and the la-la-land liberal fabrications and ask, where is the pre-test? Where is the post test? Where is the control group or control data, and where is the test subject or data?
Did NOAA have satellite pictures back in 1880? Did NOAA take water temperatures in the middle of the Pacific ocean in 1880?
Why the pretense of comparatives? Is it an attempt to trick fools and drones into believing there was data to compare with, way back then?
NOAA admitted some time ago the data that scientists collected over a century ago was flawed. It was a theory, and is still just a theory. The standards and measures for lengths and temperatures is still the original standards, so how could the science have been flawed then?
If NOAA, and the fake NASA site claim the data collected 100 years ago is flawed, why did they adjust everything down? If there is a two percent to four percent margin of error (the standard in science) the data can be adjusted either way. Margin of error accounts for adjustments both ways. Real scientists would know that, and proceed with that scientific methodology, regardless of the outcome. Not so with NOAA. Why? Why does NOAA adjust only to their predetermined agenda? It must be a predetermined agenda otherwise NOAA would have employed real scientific methodology and treated data with a margin of error to correct for either deviance. They refused to do what scientists do.
Did NOAA have satellites in the 1880s, or did they send out a crew daily to measure the ocean surface temperatures in the middle of the pacific? That must have been one hell of a chain of row boats.
A chain of row boats, with the original standards and measures would have been much more accurate, being in the moment when the norms and standards were established, rendering the most pretentious scientific, liberal, political assault on science and technology in the future, moot.
The audacity of these moronic-sub-scientists to think they are more qualified to adjust the standards and measures today of those that made them scores and hundreds of years ago, is astounding.
Every time I go to the sites and check the claims (not even theories), of these buffoon dem/libs, I have to laugh.
It is like mickey mouse, a cartoon, writing a science fiction novel, and dem/libs guffawing and harrumphing when someone asks if the writer is a cartoon. “Oh no, he’s real, they claim, he’s a fact, its true that cartoons can come to life.”
How utterly moronic can these stupid dem/libs get?
And then the pigs, the slovenly mutts, flag, remove and criticize my posts. They attack and allow me, and truth itself, no defense. That is just sick. It is sick, psycho, liberal pseudo-science.
What do we expect from neanderthal scientists, measuring the heat of a volcano by jumping in? Actually they measure it by throwing someone else in, or convincing the ignorant masses to jump in for a free phone.
Morons, dem/lib dimwits, science-retards!

RE: “Scientific evidence for warming of the climate system is unequivocal.” Originally written 6/21/16.

RE: “Scientific evidence for warming of the climate system is unequivocal.”
The following is my response to a post on craigslist in Salt Lake City, June 21, 2016.
In this post the “writer” plagiarizes NOAA with the title of the post and numerous claims throughout.
I write:
Show us the evidence.
What is a climate system? Is dimwit dem/lib talking about a “clime”, or maybe a weather front? These are real terms that reveal real science, understanding, and real knowledge, while “.warming of the climate system…” is at best a non-scientific construction of an alien-structured grammatical mess. Who, what, fabricated this poor collection of words and terms?
Do these dem/libs, fabricating goofy terms and words, think others will wet themselves and follow in line behind simpletons that cannot construct a rational thought?
What is a “…climate system”? What is, “Warming of the climate system…”? Climate is warming and cooling. This dem/lib is speaking in circles to confuse others, and dazzle unsuspecting readers with his/her/its sophistry (look it up).
Scientific evidence? How could there be evidence when there is no data? Where are the volumes and pages of lists of university studies by PHD students submitting their theses?
Where are the measurements, data? Evidence is non-existent without data and a measurement or two. Anyone can pick a topic, go to a library, look up in the indexes for studies done by PHD students on almost anything. This is cutting edge stuff. Anyone can go to the library, look up climate topics and find numerous studies showing the temperatures are dropping.
Suppose I make a claim to illustrate my superior knowledge.
“I know a yard is longer than a meter”, I state.
“How do you know?”, you ask. I reply. “I just know.”
You press, “how long is a yard?” I say, “pretty long, the evidence shows it.” You ask, “how long is a meter?”
I reply, “almost as long as a yard.” You think you have me so you ask me, “If you are comparing the two, how can you know one is longer than the other if you cannot actually compare them. How can you know anything about either measurement if you refer to no studies that compare them, and if you cannot define how long either is?” I reply, “I just know it, the evidence is there.”
Anyone, at this point would ask, “what evidence?”
Besides the fact that I would be dead wrong regarding a yard being longer than the meter, one could also note I totally rejected scientific methodology.
A meter is a full yard plus 3.6 more, MORE inches, making a meter longer than a yard. That is a comparison using a common standard of measuring, to compare the two. This qualifies as data applied. Using one or the other as a standard, and then comparing, would be considered data.
You ask me again, to explain the comparison between the two, and how I can make a comparison without actually comparing variables; without common measurements or data to compare. I reply, “scientific evidence for measuring the measure of a longer yard than a meter, is unequivocal.” At this point you realize you are talking to an uneducated, egomaniacal moron, just as we, the educated and honest conservatives try to communicate with dem/libs, living in “I am special in liberal la-la-land.”
Using an inch to measure two “systems”, and then comparing, we see that a meter is longer than a yard, but a dem/lib would argue against that, if it meant he or she could propagate government stealing from all to give to the dem/lib frauds and liars.
Where is the science? This pseudo-science, injected presumptions played as credible facts, from dem/libs, is almost laughable.
Where is the data? Where is the hypothesis, the theory, the study parameters and interpretations of data? Where is the comparative unit of measure? These things are real characteristics of real science, and the dem/libs haven’t even got a clue how far from real science they are. Lying has a way of making one stupid. In essence, as mom and dad taught us, dem/libs are only fooling themselves.
There is absolutely nothing credible from the bogus sites because everything is a fabrication.
Everything from liberals is just like my little brother, in third grade, “this guy I know…”, trying to fabricate credibility from a lie. Then he would ramble on to fabricate false truth and “science” to suit his goal, hoping to convince us to give him our money or whatever he wanted.
Notice too, that NOAA is a .gov entity. Government is part of this? Now there is a source for total dishonesty. Why do dem/libs pick and choose which lies from government they want to believe? Are dem/libs so lost in la-la-looney science land that they think it is okay for government to lie as long as it is only lying to conservatives and smart people? The average democrat is at least 10 IQ points below the average republican. Democrats have the uneducated Mexican/muslim vote to factor in their averages. I rest my case.
The fact is that more republicans graduate than democrats. How many Mexicans, do you know, that graduated from college? Do you know just one? The big fraud the democrats proffer is that Mexicans, invaders and the dregs of mexico, work hard, vote, and are recipients of higher education. Such stupidity, claims connected by nothing except dem/lib lies, is hilarious.
Mexicans in college? How is that possible when the morons cannot even speak English? Who is more ignorant, the Mexican or the dem/libs that persist with bogus claims that are so easily refuted a third grade Mexican him or herself could refute the “lies”?
Remember this and you will know the liberal/progressive/fascist mind: they always want something for no contribution of their own but boast of two things: what they plan to contribute and what they plan to force others to contribute.

FAKE WEATHER REPORT, JUNE 6 2018

FAKE NEWS REPORTING FAKE WEATHER

FAKE WEATHER REPORT JUNE 6, 2018

FAKE NEWS REPORTING FAKE WEATHER

On June 6, 2018, the weather reports claimed 95 degree heat, in June, is 20 degrees above normal. LIES, fake weather. What is a normal temperature? Is normal an average, or mean temperature? Is normal a measurement of daily average temperatures, or average high temperatures? No. Normal is messing with communication to distract, deceive, and delude, YOU.

How many days of below average high temperatures in May and June did SLC experience? The fake news reported nothing regarding this yet pretends that “normal” is somehow scientific or that comparing normal nothings to one day above average daily highs, is significant while ignoring 20 days of below average high temperature recordings.

To clarify: there are a number of different, DIFFERENT measurements used by the fake media reporting fake weather.

Daily average high temperatures is a measurement of the highest daily temperature. It is one measurement per day.

The mean temperature is a measurement of daily average temperatures. It includes a number of measurements through the day, standardized and taken as an average over a monthly period. So very different from daily high temperatures.

Fake media fabricating fake “extreme weather” purposely interchanges the terms and words to create confusion. 

The fake news reports apples and oranges together as if the confusion of variables was magically “scientific”? Comparing daily mean (average) temperatures with daily average highs or lows, is such a political marmalade of anti-science fake news, no wonder people believe it is 40 degrees when it is snowing.

CRAIGSLIST POST: “publius piglius”. A RESPONSE TO A STEPHEN HAWKING REPORT, NOVEMBER 6, 2016

RE: “publius piglius” A response to a Stephen Hawking “Report” on Craigslist, Salt Lake City, November 6, 2016

What a mess of a being, utardia. What a lying piece of dog crap.

Nothing that moron writes is true.

Hawking said nothing about Trump. Hawking is a scientist, actually not a scientist, a theorist. He is not a political commentator. His “intelligence” does not spill over into other areas because he does not exert any effort in anything else except imagination and science fiction.

Utardia/whatever’s first line, first lie.

No, not a lot of people consider hawking to be the smartest… some do, maybe. How many think what bolshevik-dick claims, is a lot, 70 trillion, 70, 3? Is it a matter of percentage? Is 3.3 million a “lot of people”? 3.3 million represents one percent. Can dick not think in terms of context?

Hawking’s theories are theories. There is no science to theory until there is experiment.

Which Tuesday did Hawking, allegedly say these things? This moron, utardia, cannot even get logistical facts right. Utardia/whatever writes that, ”So it’s understandable why, on Tuesday, people sort of freaked out when….”

This comment by urardia has been posted and reposted and reposted and reposted, over and over and over for months.

There is no date, not even the month or year. If you google this it does not exist.

No date, just a fabrication with an intentional evasion of a date, to hide the fraud, and thus the second sub-sentence, the conditional, that people sort of freaked out, is a lie as well.

That’s great. Moronicus/maximus, utardia/whatever, got two lies in one sentence. He/she/it is getting worse. Pardon me, he/she/it has been worse for a long time.

One would think this moron would eventually learn. Dangling and misplaced modifiers makes his/her/its sentences whacky and contradictory.

Is Trump’s rise due to his non-existent interview with British News Station ITV NEWS? According to moron utardia/whatever, it is the connection. Does this moron try to connect these “things” purposely?

Everything is a fabrication.

Here we go again, ”Human caused climate change”, allegedly spoken by non-scientist, non-political commentator, on a non-day, non-month, non-year in a non publication. Wow, do you, dear fellow American actually believe anything dick writes?

One might be able to ascribe some sense to a statement Hawking did not make if it wasn’t so uproariously whacky. 250 degrees? The temperature of the planet is going to increase 250 degrees because of CO2 breaking free of another nothing at the bottom of the oceans? That is just stupid. I mean, laughable stupid stooooooooooooooopid. Is that utardia/whatever actually this stupid? Even Hawking’s goofy theories are not as stupid.

If Hawking is so smart maybe he can explain what is holding, binding large amounts of CO2 on the ocean’s floor? Is it mud, because we have mud everywhere? Is it silt, because we have silt everywhere? Is it sand, rocks, whale poo, because we have all that everywhere?

Mr. “scientist” needs to explain such a crazy theory. Oops, did I mention theory? Did I actually use that word “theory”? Did Hawking do an experiment or theorize? Did Hawking, or whale-poop brain utardia/whatever go to the bottom of the oceans, EVERYWHERE and find trapped, bound, CO2 in massive amounts, and measure it, or is that theory too?

But wait, the interview did not happen, on a television station that does not exist for a pseudo-theorist to comment on something for which he is not an expert, in a world where Hawking does not venture.

So the theory must be looney toony utardia/whatever’s imagination: utardia/whatever’s sci-fi fantasy, another hate-motivated fraud.

So Hawking made no such statements or theories. Hawking has not been to the bottom of the oceans; in fact nobody has.

Hawking, Trump, the British Prime minister, Utardia/moronicus/whatever has not been to the ocean floor, and nobody, ABSOLUTELY NOBODY HAS BEEN TO THE OCEAN FLOOR.

…HENCE NOBODY TOOK MEASUREMENTS OF SOMETHING THEY CANNOT SAY FOR SURE EXISTS WHERE THE SUN NEVER SHINES.

MY GAWD, WHAT A MORON!

The greatest danger to mankind is liberalism. Liberalism (democrat party eugenicists and maniacs) is the biggest promoter of big, centralized government.

The world is a history of big, centralized government, and big, centralized government causing wars, murdering people, and being the sole cause of genocide.

Hang that filthy slob utardia/whatever, for treason.

This dem/lib/progressive propaganda is murder and genocide-in-the-making.