I WONDER. NEWS, TODAY: REPORT THAT WE WENT TO THE MOON IN SPACE SHIPS WITH LESS TECHNOLOGY THAT VEHICLES HAVE TODAY. NO WAY!

Has anyone gone back and looked at the computers used in the space program of the 1960s? Not only is it archaic but if it is true that those computers were less tchnologilly capable than vehicles today there is no way they could respond fast enough for a trip around th corner to the grocery store.

Have you ever watched th computer geeks at the command posts, as they worked, apparently worked? They do nothing. What are they working on? Were they using Pascal, rotunda or caveman programming?

For gawd’s sake, there is nothing they could do while a so-called space ship was in flight. How slow would those computers have been? An abacus would have been faster.

The speed of computation could not have been ay faster than personal computers of the 1990s and early 2000s, slow.

Two variables to consider: how fast was data gathered while those nerds sat at those boxes, and how fast could a caveman computer translate the data and by what programs was data acquired and interpreted?

You will find no answers because the mute, colluding corrupt media was in in the scam.

Take your first cell phone out of retire, text a few sentences, go to the internet, wait for it, wait for it….oh yeah, forgot, not 5G, or 4G, or 1G. It was bits per second, analog, not wireless or fiber.

It must have been a hell of a long telecommunications cable going from the NASA command center and following that space craft as it left orbit and wrapped around the earth a few times on its way to the :moon”.

How did they communicate with the space craft, radio waves? Too slow. How fast does sound travel in a ir? How fast does sound travel in a vacuum? How fast does radio wave travel in air? How fast in a vacuum? Does it?

I do not know, I am asking.

Has everybody forgotten? It was NASA that created space flight then and it is NASA fabricating global warming today.

Take a look at the scientific paper I have included for your sensory bombardment.

I was in the labs in my university eduction. Every lab experience, every experiment, every investigation at the library into prior studies and experiments, began with an outline, description of the study and/or experiment. Every single study and experiment had a hypothesis, a mode of collection of data, parameters for collating and interpreting data, and a means of connecting the intended data to a predetermined effect of defined and isolated causes. Cause and effect was clearly identified, defined, and organized.

We have never seen a shred from NASA.

Today we are bombarded with effects and solutions taken from absolutely nothing resembling cause, stimulus, data, measurements or predetermined collation methodology.

There was absolutely nothing in the aluminum foil days of the LM of Apollo 11, 12 13. Three trips to the moon with landings, organized and directed by nerdy geeks on computers with less power than your watch today. IMPOSSIBLE!

We are being grotesquely and grossly manipulated, deceived, exploited and discarded.

NASA, IPCC, NOAH, WMO, AAAS, and others are all void of cause, data, measurements, but they all offer up effects without connection to their stated causes. There must be data, pre and post testing, isolation of a variable to test and hypothesized variable. Never do we see a control group of control data. NEVER! How is solution possible without cause? Impossible!

FAKE WEATHER FORECASTS ARE PLANNED FAILURES TO EXACT CONTROL

Forecasts were planned failures, meant to manipulate.

Liars and thieves who want control must be known as liars and thieves who get away with crime.  Liars’ and thieves’ goal is ti be irrefutably accepted as above the law.

The “NEWS” in Salt Lake City forecast 100 degrees for June 11, 2021. It did not hit 100 but in the minds of the viewers the day was so unbelievably hot , excessively hot, extremely hot, smacks of global-warming-hot, a new parameter had been established and the viewers accepted any new standard: that 95 degrees is global-warming 100 degrees and hotter. It was just as they said and predicted. Except that it is not.

Forecast for June 13th was 104 degrees, “approaching record heat”. Does the “NEWS” ever forecast record cold temperatures, approaching record cold? NO. WHY?

It did not hit 104 degrees. It did not hit 100 degrees either. 

I have noticed a number of trends. At 5: 00 PM, Sunday. June 13th, the temperature was recorded as 100 degrees. My thermometers, operating accurately for decades showed less, 95 degrees. I have worked outside for decades. I know 100 degrees from 103/104.

I know 95 degrees from 100. It was not 100 degrees, and my thermometers showed it.

They, the corrupt, globalist, fake weather/global warming “NEWS” “people” are lying to YOU!

Again, it did not hit a new record, as forecast but in people’s minds it was excessively hot, so hot it must be global warming. Virtual pres biden called it global warming but it is not! He slipped and called it what used to be called, and what the true fabricated fear of it is.

It must be warming, but the globalist goons will not call it that anymore, because people are wise, and more do not believe than do.

The situation is like a “NEWS” person responding to a finger pointing at an alien, and claiming, ‘ that is not an alien. It is just a guy dressed like an alien’.

THE MASSES CONVINCED OF HEAT WAVES ACROSS AMERICA

You have been convinced we are experiencing heat waves across America? What questions did you ask? How about this one: is it hotter than last year, the year before? Do you remember the long cold winter and spring last year, and this year?

Just this morning, the retard reporters, yauney and cronk (sounds like a comedy duo), reported it was 68 degrees at 7:30 AM. Yauney then added it was colder today this time than the same time yesterday. Could we call it a cool wave? Why not? Two days of average daily high temperatures qualify as a heat wave, so two days of daily high temperatures below average surely must also qualify as cool wave. Who decides, morons?

Forecast for today is “approaching” 100 and by Sunday mid 90s. That is not a heat wave, especially when 100 to 102 degrees this day’ average daily high, is typical. How is that a heat wave? How is one day “approaching” 100 degrees, a typical daily high, and then cooling five (or more degrees)l how is the cooling not considered and reported as a cool wave or cooling trend?

One day, maybe close to 100, a little below typical temperatures (you know, daily average high temperature), does not constitute a heat wave any more than it constitutes a cool wave.

Idiot reporter on Fox “NEWS”, yauney, claimed, “…we have all the above, heat, for the weekend”.

It is summer. Is that moron aware of that?

It is a desert, and summer. Is that moron not aware of that?

Heat waves across America, not very hot, but convincing, why? What, or who, makes something convincing? Is it reality that convinces? NO! Repetition, lies and fear make chaotic reality, by design.

Weather reports are that mid 80s degrees are forecast for Philadelphia, and erroneously reported, as in Utah, and everywhere. Mid 80s highs in Philadelphia are well below daily average high temperatures but, magically, the weather goons fail to report that.

In the 1970s heat waves in Texas and across the south produced days on end without reprieve from 105 degrees day after day. so-called, fear and fabrication motivated heat waves today are not as hot, and if correctly and honestly reported, would state clearly that we are in, and have been in, a cooling cycle for decades.

Utah is, IS a desert. A desert is hot.

I have gone back and checked the records. For approximately half of the days back to 1842, as far back as the Farmer’s Almanac goes, records have been washed. Most “records” show the daily high of 75 degrees,  (in the summer months). Other days the daily high is a percentage, for example, 1975, 75.9.

Other charts and records communicate that average daily highs for June are 98 degrees, when recorded correctly.  Do not forget, I challenge the temperatures recorded in these last few moths. Days the recorded high was “approaching” 100 degrees or record highs, the temperatures remained in the low 90s.

Look at my posts in June 2021.

If the dopes of weather reported, “…wow, that 35 degrees is a scorcher”, would you believe it? Probably. What questions you have had project the questions you will have.

In 2009 I returned to my window washing business. That summer Salt Lake City weather reported 30 days of temperatures over 100. I recall days and days of 102 and 103 degree highs. When it dropped to 100 or less it was nice. !02 degrees and hotter is sweltering, sticky, We have not hit 100 yet, this year, even though the goons of weather have reported approaching and reaching 100.

Lies! Why? Are you convinced of “heat and drought? Drought in a desert? Stupid!

Low water temperatures are not low. Reservoirs collect water.

Dry and hot days are typical, remember, for a desert. Higher water levels in the reservoirs is a function of management. We have had a little less precipitation in the mountains this year but the “managers” have let more water through the damns so they can report “drought and climate change”.

Why? Why do people lie about these things?

Do you think liars care about the genres and areas of deception?

Do you think that a liar who lies about your home mortgage being safe, would have conscience regarding lying to you in any area? The goal, remember is to deceive you for profit. The goal in lying to you regarding “heat waves” is also gain and profit. Behind the scenes people are being bought and bribed.

“Saint George isn’t taking any chances, especially with extreme temperatures.”

Is that Fox “reporter”, Dani Ruberti, retarded? Is she stupid? Doesn’t Saint George experience “extreme heat every summer, being a desert? Saint George geography is a typical desert: no trees, no shelter from the typically blistering sun.

Have you ever watched old “cowboy” movies? Have you noticed the apparent blistering heat?

Do you realize that 100 years ago, 200 years ago, deserts were hot, and sometimes received no precipitation all summer.

Do you realize that the dirty 30s were hot, dry? Drought, true drought, throughout the green belt of agriculture was prevalent for years, almost a decade. It, the weather,  was hot, hotter than today. America experienced scorching heat that dried up the whole country, for years. We are not experiencing the same at all; not even close.

I appreciated damon yauney’s 8:00 AM weather report of drought and suffering, while he showed pictures of a lush, green, well watered Salt Lake Valley.

What other observation retardation will yauney exhibit? Can these morons not look at what they say and the pictures that accompany their chaos?

Are you so sheepish you believe lies while pictures of reality blast YOU?

I heard only part of the report, at this coffee shop, while I worked away at this commentary, “Unusual circumstances, as power systems are taxed.”

Maybe that moron yauney, or his writers, can tell us how transformers, that operate at hundreds of degrees, “feeling” unusually taxed? Are transformers, electrical surge and power stations, operating at hundreds of degrees, analyzed by psychotherapists who then report distress and low feelings of self-worth? Do transformer, and electrical power installations need therapy, counseling and days off?

There is no more heat than usual, but they are preparing us for loss, restrictions, cessation and rationing.

Are you ready for rationing of power, while rulers, government “people” have access to all that we will lose?

These lies and fabrications have one thing in common: one thing you should question and ask, why, to begin with, at least: WHY DOES ALL THIS RHETORIC, PROPAGANDA  AND LIES PRODUCE GOVERNMENT CONTROLS, ON YOU?

There is no provision or plan, or premeditation, or preparing, or warning  that government “people” will suffer loss, restrictions or rationing. Are you prepared for power outages, restrictions, rolling outages and rationing? Government rationing, according to government “people’s” schedules will kill people, YOU. Are you ready? Have you been properly prepared by government “people” ;lying and creating, fabricating and propagating misinformation and outright lies directing and moving you to bolshevik peasantry, or death if you resist?

If this is all too much to believe, tell us, what are they doing different than what I have described? Where is the plan for government “people” to suffer and ration, along with We, the People? Did all the government “people” share their wealth with us? Did Pelosi engage in insider trading to make all of us rich, or just herself, to the tune of hundreds of millions?

Is it not revelatory that the elitists, the government class, tells us “we are all in this together”, while they get rich, experience no loss, and have no problems buying food, necessities and oproduct limited by transportation?

Did Biden and Hunter collaborate, collude with Chinese and the corrupt Ukrainian government he and Ol Bommy installed, so they could make us all rich, or just themselves?

Is That gopher cheeks idiot, McConnel in bed with communist Chinese rulers to make us all rich, or just he and his commie wife’s family?

Did dementocrat Swallwell sleep with a known communist Chinese spy to share inside information to benefit We, the People, or just himself and his “buddies” of the dementocrat party?

Again, new challenges are propagated, in spite of a look at comparative realities. New challenges because of the natural, desert-styled drought. Moron reporting! 

Normal water volume is reported as not volume. How stupid. Did you catch that? 80,000 acre feet but this time of year 15,000 acre feet, about 19 percent of what the “managers” keep it filled. Look at the reservoirs. Do they look like they are over 80 percent down, lower, lacking? SUCH bloody BS from idiot puppets and lying bolsheviks behind the scenes.

The best cleaner is Chlorine bleach. It kills immediately, breaks down bacterium cell walls upon contact and breaks bonds that hold viruses together. Alternate cleaners have been promoted and sold, flooded markets with “new” cleaners that are poison.

Chlorine breaks down, dissipates and evaporates quickly leaving no toxins within seconds, while other “cleaners” leave residues that poison YOU.

Chlorine leaves the body quickly with no side effects, unless in a gaseous state and inhaled or in contact with exposed areas, such as the eyes.

Consider the following reality, hidden from you because you cannot comprehend cause and effect because questioning and deductive reasoning have been wiped from YOUR mind, and the minds of your children.

What is soap? Soap is naturally anti-bacterial. How does soap work?

Soap breaks down cell walls. A simple soap breaks down cell walls of bacterium. Soap that stays in concentrated form, on your skin will eat your skin. Soap, by itself, even in the simplest form, will kill, KILL bacteria: germs.

What is anti-bacterial soap? If soap is naturally anti-bacterial then anti-bacterial soap is anti-bacterial anti-bacterial.

Is anti-anti positive? Do you see the redundancy? Added toxins and chemicals to simple soap do not make it any better for YOU. In fact, added poisons, in concert with soap that breaks down your skin, exposing your blood and lymph flow to poisons not needed to kill bacteria, kill you. 

Idiot yauney, claimed, relief from non-existent heat waves was coming while, in reality it was relief from regular, typical temperatures, actually lower than typical temperatures. Dummy yauney “reported” “…close to 100 degrees today, highs of 94 for fathers’ day, and back down to 80s by Monday.

Did that liar report daily average high temperatures dropping 20 degrees in two days, for a week? That drastic drop makes a hell of a big difference in daily average temperatures over the whole year, showing dropping temperature and cooling; nothing resembling a heat wave or global warming. How stupid yauney and cronk must be, and dishonest.

What a dimwit, another goof reporting Juneteenth and “Turkey” day.

How stupid can this bolshevik puppet get? And they worry about how they look, making sure their make-up is right, because they are so damned pretty, and stupid. They forget about stupid because stupid pays them a lot of big bucks. Cares for truth? Not a thought by bolshevik puppet idiots.

FORECAST FOR JUNE 4TH 2021, SALT LAKE CITY, PREDICTING “NEAR RECORD HIGHS”

FORECAST FOR JUNE 4TH 2021, SALT LAKE CITY, PREDICTING “NEAR RECORD HIGHS”

June 3rd, 2021, predicting near record temperatures for June 4th, 2021.

The “NEWS” was that tomorrow’s forecast could produce record breaking highs. Part of the forecast predicted that June 4th could also be the earliest SLC area would hit triple digit highs.  Did not happen. “They” tried to make it appear that 100 was reached but you must look at the reality.

At 5:00 PM temperatures start to drop. Seldom do temperatures rise after 5:00 PM, if ever. The temperature stayed at 98 degrees for hours, even an hour after 5:00 PM, then suddenly it bolted to 100 degrees, like it was thinking it needed to respond to a command.

If you doubt this then you have no idea what science is, partially because you have never exercised it.

Science is change. If you have not paid attention, or scrutinized past events and patterns, you will not only be oblivious to reality and science, but you will remain part of the truly, ignorant masses. Everybody gets messages on their phone about temperatures, at any given moment. From where do these arrive? Do these temperatures come from the centralized (bad sign) official source? What is the official source? Have you thought about that? No? Do you know the difference between intellect and intelligence? Do you know what deductive reason is? No? Then do not question my observations.

It is all part of global hoaxing, warming, that is not warming. Please, learn scientific methodology and find scientific methodology, even just one characteristic of it, in any of the so-called climate sites.

Go to my section of CLIMATE CHANGE/GLOBAL WARMING and read, learn.

MORE REGARDING MY 3/3/18 COMMENTARY, “OCEAN FLOOR SINKING”

More regarding my commentary of 3/2/18, “Ocean floor sinking”

I had written and published a commentary refuting the moronic idea that the ocean floor is sinking. It occurred to me that I missed a major point. If the ocean floor is sinking, dropping, where is it going? That was a part of my original commentary, but there is another related point to consider.

If the ocean floor is sinking, dropping “down”, from what relative point is it dropping? There must be a measurement and comparison of pre-test conditions and post test: science.

Is the ocean floor sinking with respect to the land, the shores around the world? If it is, then water is not rising. If the ocean floor is sinking, then the ocean water level at the shoreline is dropping, not rising.

Where is the benchmark, for measuring such changes in elevations and depths? Non-existent? Hmmm, do the dem/lib dimwits even know what a benchmark is? Not very science-ish, is it?

Or, the ocean floor is sinking and water is rising, keeping the level with respect to the land, around the world, the same, constant. The dumb bolshevik manipulators of reality make neither claim. They just fabricate and lie. Who went to the ocean floor and measured the depth, and from where?

Do you see, that I almost made the argument for the climate-hoaxers by stating the water levels have remained the same, but it is because the volume of water has increased. The dementocrats and la-la-land liberals, spewing grotesque globalist/bolsheievik fraud, do not have the capacity for intellectual honesty or study. What a bunch of illiterate, ignorant boneheads.

Do you see how stupid dem/lib, progressive/bolshevik, unsubstantiated headline claims are?

It is intellect that prompts questions, not lock-step, droning, liberal news and dementocracy.

Think! Ask questions, why…

PART 2: THE BURDEN OF PROOF IN CLIMATE CHANGE, GLOBAL WARMING, “SCIENCE”

Original publication on SLC Craigslist, June 15, 2016, in response to a post by Utardia, a “writer”, regurgitator of marxist/liberal climate dogma and deception.

Part two, applying science to compare and contrast a democracy versus a constitutional republic.

Do we need to define “rational”?

A witness to anything helps clarify and also helps debunk. Clarity, truth is the goal.

When we look at the Constitution and the Amendments we find standard for many things.

A standard establishes common communication. Standards in science, must also be established otherwise we have no comparisons, no observations, and nothing obvious. Without the obvious and irrefutable, the burden of proof of science is not met, and the doubt rules.

It must be so because everything at any given point is based upon and operates around established truths: truths that for the moment seem to explain and predict.

Real science does not ask people to adjust to something not proved or unreal. Science does not, for example, ask people to prepare for dragon fire that does not exist, and the same is prevalent in all science, including unsubstantiated, standard-less global hoaxing.

Why do We, the People, have a Bill of Rights? Is the Bill of Rights for government? Government is a thing. It is a thing, like a tool, used by We, the People. Government, in America, a Constitutional Republic, is not a tool for politicians to use. The Bill of Rights establishes, quite clearly, that the amendments require burdensome effort to change. OUR traditions and OUR working laws, today, now, cannot be changed without due proof of necessity.

The burden of proof is that law requires authority; authority granted by We, the People, NOT government, to prove need.

Take the right to be presumed innocent before the law. This simple amendment: this one in particular, establishes that the individual is supreme. The Rights in the Bill of Rights, are for the individual, not a conglomerate government collective of rulers.

The burden of proof, wherein guilt must be proved without doubt, is what sets every single person in America in the same status before the law. So none, in any position, can suppress the law, and create a slave, or a slave class by extortion of law.

The burden of proof applies in all things in a free society.

Realistically, there are few truly free societies in the whole history of the world, but we can see two from which We, the People, can draw experience and guidance.

The Magna Carta, an Anglo origination in 1215 England, was the beginning of a freedom the world had never seen. It was a freedom for all peoples, not just a political class. In fact it was designed to oppose and control a political class.

You could call monarchy, dictatorship, and oligarchy, a political class. No matter what the pretentious name, a political class is a ravaging organization exploiting, using, and killing slaves itself, themselves, create.

We, in America have not fallen into slavery. Slavery has been thrust upon us. Slavery was created by diabolical, psychopathic “people”. Every single democrat politico in America, is a psychopathic monarchist. Heavy claim, but to actually join the democrat party one must surely know the democrat party is involved in a push for dictatorial oligarchy. Nobody falls into slavery by default. Nobody falls into a position of being a slave owner or master, by mistake either.

The second I know I have ill-gotten gains, taken by force or legal force, is the second I know I have unjustly profited by someone’s efforts. That is theft: it is slavery.

The burden of proof in science, is no different. It is meant to prove beyond doubt, that something is true.

How can one be sure of truth if it is not proven beyond doubt? The foundation for rationality is truth beyond doubt.

A scientist is required to make a claim of suspected truth.

I believe, for example, that coffee makes one jittery. I make a claim, called a thesis or hypothesis. A hundred, a thousand people can refute my claim, and do so rationally. All they have to say, is they don’t believe it. Their opinion is valid as opinion. A million people can refute my claim and my claim is nothing, yet.

If I were to take these million people, subject half of them to drinking one cup of coffee in the morning, while half get no coffee, and then I measure and quantify the observations, collecting them into obvious results, then I have exercised scientific methodology.

In this case where utardia claims I need to provide proof when it is he/her/it that makes the challenge against established science, utardia misses the establishment of reality, as usual, and thus remains in a state of suspended reality, refusing to change to the obvious.

I am not required to bend to fantasy while already living in established reality.

But this is the fraud the dem/lib/progressives continually try to ram down Conservative America’s throat.

I have no burden to believe a single thing utardia or any of the global hoaxers, I mean warmers, claim until I see rational measurements, results taken from the obvious and irrefutable.

We have no results of anything until something is done to produce results. Making a model does not qualify. Making predictions without measurements does not qualify.

I can claim europeans have large noses. How do I measure large? Is “large” a comparative? If so, what is the standard upon which I decide to employ? Is my standard rational, or noticeable, measurable?

If I claim europeans have large noses, is it logical I describe how much bigger they are? Is it logical and fair that I describe bigger? Is bigger longer, wider, taller, more sunk in the head?

The burden of proof is all mine.

All the sophist pretenses by dem/libs, utardia sub-intelligent dog, for example, pretending to be smart, does not provide a shred of evidence and certainly meets no burden of proof, or even a simple claim or theory to precede finding and proving the hopeful obvious. The dem/libs have never made it to the first stages of science: theory, hypothesis and intelligent claim.

Who are the dem/libs trying to deceive?

THE BURDEN OF PROOF IN CLIMATE CHANGE, GLOBAL WARMING, “SCIENCE”

Original publication on SLC Craigslist, June 15, 2016, in response to a post by Utardia, a “writer”, regurgitator of marxist/liberal climate dogma.

The burden of scientific proof rests with the prosecution. There is two basic results of science: proving a theory or hypothesis, or failing to prove a theory or hypothesis.

Utardia, that dimwit lying crap-superstar, claims I need to provide proof. Is that proof of a negative? Is that proof that where I stand exists?

A tradition is immovable until it is movable, by something new, and obvious. Global hoaxing, I mean warming, is magnificently NOT obvious, except to dictatorial goons making big bucks off others’ fears, and obvious to bogus scientists extrapolating something from clearly NOTHING. When I say nothing I mean no data, no pre-test, no post test, no control group, no measurements, but lots of polluting and “reinterpreting” standard, immovable data.

It is all a fraud, a lie based on imaginary demons and fire breathing dragons, heating up the world. Where are the dragons other than the nether reaches of political scientists’ ever-augmenting ethereal interpretations of imaginary science from cosmological shock troops?

I might add that all those innumerable “climate scientists” do not exist. There are writers galore, political puppets who quote each others’ papers and stories of studies.

“The oceans will rise by 20 feet by the year 2015”, 144,000 Witnesses of Jehovah will be taken heavenward in 1918, I mean 1933, I mean 1975, I mean 1999, I mean okay who is this Jehovah guy”? “The climate system will kill millions by 2012”. Pictures of moose dying, deserts and dead fish on the shores all cause world-wide stench by 2010”. Obama will turn back the rise of the oceans by shear will power.

Some will argue he did it. Then why do we need anything else? Why do we need political exertion, taxation and subservience to the democrat party and liberals when obama can do it all?

Come on people, the oceans have not risen, temperatures have dropped. It is colder today, it cools off at night, and summers are shorter. Fewer people die from heat waves today than they did 20, 30 and 40 years ago.

We stand on solid ground of tradition. Somebody designed a thermometer well over a century ago, and that same thermometer is the standard.

What is the standard?

Water boils at 212 degrees at sea level, and freezes at 32 degrees. There is no change in that. That is the standard. Who will challenge that? Who would even think that this fact is not one of the world’s most reliable templates? 

Why do global hoaxers, I mean warmers, even attempt to change these standards?

We can always make new thermometers at the boiling point, and and it is still the standard because it is still the boiling point and we design and change OURSELVES to that fact.

Global hoaxers, I mean warmers, have been trying to change We, the People, and reality to their inconsistent and shifting predictions. They have no standards because they are sloppy, pretentious, anti-science comic-cons. Where is the data?

Data is not data unless it has a standard and a means of measuring preconditions and new, or changing conditions. This is science, the beginning of science.

How do we measure time? We measure it by change. We make a 24 hour day of a time frame between sunrise and another sunrise. We don’t dictate that we want 24 hours in a day, and make the planet rotate different. But that is the approach global hoaxers, I mean warmers, have taken.

We do not look at the sunrise and try to slow it down so we can have 25 hour days. That is ludicrous. It borders on insanity if not full blown lunacy. But that is what global hoaxers, I mean warmers, are trying to do with no data, no pre-test, no post-test, no measurements, and no sea level markers. They have not even tried to present this simple experiment because it is a failure every time.

Surely, somewhere along the way, maybe 10 years ago, maybe 20 or 30 years ago, someone, a real scientist, must have surely stuck a stick in the water and measured ocean levels regularly to show ocean-level rise. Why has no scientist presented this data? Would this data be irrefutable if it could be found to show a rise in ocean levels? Absolutely, and I would concur. But there is not one single reference to a stick in a rock anywhere? Absolutely nothing! NOAA, for example, has absolutely nothing that represents a stick in a rock, or anything an intellect could imagine and design to measure change.

So, I ask, are oceans rising? Surely it must be obama that stopped the rise, with just his word.

How much did it rise before he made the promise? ZERO! That was a  pretty safe bet for him, was it not.

It must be zero, otherwise dem/lib politico/scientists would have shown us. NOTHING!

The burden of proof is always on the upstarts, the new science, the new theories and hypotheses.

I am a cop, standing in the middle of the street, directing traffic. Who will argue that traffic flows at my standard, stable, already existing presence?

It takes a pre-test to assert the variables for the study, and it takes measurements of some sorts (maybe time lapse of driver response due to traffic officer’s directions, as compared to time lapse when traffic officer is not present).

You see, dear reader, the burden of proof is not only on the new science, or new theory or new hypothesis to show a change, but it is a heavy burden to first show the standards by which change will be measured and then presented as illuminating.

There is nothing obvious in dem/lib global hoaxing, I mean warming, except the raging lunacy of pseudo-scientists fabricating fear and catastrophe from lunatics’ imaginations, all done for money.

It is not my burden to provide truth to an existing science. The burden of proof, in science and almost everything, lies solely with the party making new claims or challenging established thought and tradition. The burden of proof lies with those trying to show change. Science is change, measurable change. If it is not measured there is no data, no measurable change and, hence, no science.

Global hoaxing, I mean warming, is the new claim of change, without a shred or attempt to show the change.

I see it this way. When I was a boy, some days when I would arrive at home after school I would walk in the door and smell baking. Imagine I walked in the house, and my mother says, “do you smell that?” Smell what, I ask. “The baking bread, she replies.” No.

“Well, I smell it and it is good”, she claims. Hmmm I do not smell anything.

“No matter”, she says, “will you wash the bread pans please?”

What bread pans? “The ones I baked the bread with”, she she says.

Ok, I guess you see bread pans.

“Of course I do”, she emphatically states, “right there on the counter by the sink.”

Okay, I believe you. Here I am, washing bread pans.

When I am finished washing imaginary bread pans, I sit at the kitchen table and my mother then places an empty plate before me and says, “enjoy the freshly baked bread”.

Okay mom.

In this anecdote, would you think my mother had lost something? Why do global hoaxers try the same with you and I? Are they insane or dishonest?

Global hoaxing, I mean warming, has the burden of proof, and that is why it fails so miserably. There is not even an attempt to provide pre-test conditions, post-test, hypothesis. My mother could have placed store-bought bread on plate, and tried to convince me she had baked it. Without the pre-test conditions: aroma of freshly baked bread, used bread pans and flour on the counter, I am not convinced. The global hoaxing, I mean warming, community, that does not exist except in papers by writers, tries the same. They show nothing with which a comparison, or change can be made.

I come home from school occasionally to the smell of freshly baked brread, and that is a change from the day before, and many days prior. Where is the change in the global hoaxing, I mean warming, claims?

Do we remember our science projects in grade school? The lab paper had a section for observation.

Today’s global hoaxers, I mean warmers, cannot even present “observations”. They make all kinds of claims and protests. Well, they try to present observations but any so-called observations I have investigated are always observations of something else, they claim is connected to itself. They present fear, based upon imaginary dragons fabricated for pseudo-scientists’ financial gain; fabricated by monster-imagining writers.

After the fact observations are nothing if there is no pre-fact observations. The global hoaxers never provide pre-test observations, only claims.

Where are the observations, measurements, standard by which change can be observed?

How can global hoaxers, I mean warmers, make observations without anything to observe, and how can they draw conclusions without anything to observe taken from nothing presented? There is an incredible lack of connection in all this global hoaxing “concluding” without establishing and observing.

Did the morons, for example, observe dying polar bears? Where?

Did the boneheads observe a rise in the sea level of the stick in the rock on the shore? Did the rock move? Did the boneheads move the rock? Who would do such a grievous assault on science, fact and truth itself? Liars, with a political motive. Welcome to global hoaxing!

It is not my responsibility to prove another’s theory wrong, it is the party challenging established thought and tradition that is responsible for proving truth and credibility of his or her claims and theories. Until he or she provides data, measurements, clinical and or laboratory work, the theories remain theories.

The change of scientific belief is not a fact until it is actually factual. All the global hoaxers have is fear, fabrication, and quoting other’s fears and fabrications: all for money.

The NOAA site is a fantasy of global hoaxers, I mean warmers, continually augmenting fear from fear, and from third party fear and fabrication. It is easy to see when they start talking in circles.

Science is proved, often, when scientists and the free market are convinced. I have used the invention of the rifle as an example.

When rifling was first theorized and explained, denying a better flight by a rifled bullet compared to a musket ball was accepted. That is science. After obvious proofs and evidence: observations of rifle accuracy compared with musket accuracy, denying rifles provide a better, more accurate flight, was considered rifling denial. The deniers did not last long. They were killed in the battle lines because they refused to adapt to the science: the proof by observing pre-test and post-test. They refused to change their views to fact and reality.

It is logic retardation that dimwit utardia tries to present nothing to the public as a rational argument. Global hoaxing presents observation-less observations: unsubstantiated claims.

Again, where are the observations? Where are the obvious results, of something, anything, even attempts to lie or deceive?

We are not asking for fear mongering, predictions, models or quotes from others without the necessary facets of science. We want observations and the obvious, nothing else will do. We want IRREFUTABLE science.

WE HAVE BEEN DECEIVED IN EVERYTHING

We have been deceived in everything.

Today, April 16 2020, like many other days, before going outside I looked at the temperature on my phone. Currently, at 9:45 AM, it reads 37 degrees. I wondered how it could be snowing outside.

I received a notification on my phone that FOX NEWS was interviewing Kellyanne Conway, a Trump advisor.

The interview began with Bill De Blasio, Mayor of New York City, explaining, “If we act the wrong way, jump too soon, then we could see a resurgence…so we get one chance to get it right.”

Is this a political message or a pseudo-science democrat party fabrication? Who says we only get one chance?

Do we dare trust politicians who have used models and modelers who have gotten nothing right?

Fauci was involved with HIV/AIDS when it began. Still no vaccine, no cure, just treatment. He has never been good at his job and now Trump trusts this buffoon and all the other modelers brought over from global hoaxing?

De Blasio is not his name. He is of German descent. He changed his name to deceive New Yorkers.

What an assault on truth. I cannot reveal my sources, sorry, peoples’ lives and jobs are at stake, but covid does not exist in epidemic and certainly not pandemic, degrees. I know of two nurses in different cities that told me they are under instruction, command to report anything as covid-19 that has similar signs and symptoms as the so-called covid. They re forced to report everything that slightly resembles covid-19 signs and symptoms, even when tests show negative. That is one huge fraud.

De Blasio, the Cuomo morons, Utah gov herbie stalin, and others are part of the hoax. I have wondered about Trump since he took office.

De Blasio openly lied about many things in that 15 second clip. Who is “we”? Is he talking about the medical profession and politicos who have worked so hard to deceive Americans?

We have been classically conditioned to believe that some professions are above others, above the regular working “taxpayers” (how I hate that commie/bolshevik term), and that we should give our unreserved, irrepressible love and support to the medical profession, because they ravage America and kill so efficiently.

CNBC, February 22, 2018 reported the third leading cause of death in the United States is medical error.

https://www.cnbc.com/2018/02/22/medical-errors-third-leading-cause-of-death-in-america.html

Do doctors and medicos know this? Do nurses offer a caveat, disclaimer or warning when people step into the hospital? Are some nurses dishonest? No, heavens no. The medical profession is absolute. The medical profession is not run by the pharmaceutical companies, right Bernie Sanders, democrats?

Democrats attack corporations especially pharmaceutical (evil) corporations for the fraud and ravaging heaped upon America. True or fabricated by the bolshevik democrat party and liberals, it matters not that they attack to destroy everything that does not fit their goal of world domination through centralized government control.

It can be said I took a stab at the dem/libs, and it is true, but it was done to show the near absolute compliant forced ideological oppression of the ignorant democrat party masses.

The democrats know pharmakaia, the pharmaceutical companies, are rotten to the core and now, even now, they defer to the ravaging, dishonesty and lying of big pharma, during this fabricated crisis. Where is the famed democrat and liberal sense of indignation and distrust for covid-19 as an inherent evil of an evil corporations, as a spawn of big pharma?

Are democrats so dronish they follow their leaders in switching ideologies at the drop of a face mask?

To believe a corrupt medical profession, advising political appointees; political agents, in effect, who report from a pharmaceutical perspective of deception, on any aspect of this ruse, is insanity.

There is no way the whole chain of command can suddenly be honest.

This is like the story of the frog and the scorpion.

The scorpion asks the frog for a ride across the pond. The frog replies, ‘Are you crazy,? You will sting me.” The scorpion reassures the frog it really is not in his interest to sting the frog because it, along with the frog, would drown. The frog, obliges and the scorpion stings the frog when they are almost to the shore. As they both drown the frog asks the scorpion, ‘Why did you do that? Why did you kill both of us?’

The scorpion’s reply, I am a scorpion, it is what I do. You knew I was a scorpion. did you think I was not going to be a scorpion thoughout?’

You see, the scorpion is a scorpion and the scorpion cannot help but be a scorpion. The scorpion is an incorrigible scorpion, like liars are liars.

The medical profession, a part of pharma, cannot help but be agents for pharma, so lies are part of the medical profession because they are part of the big dirty, corrupt lying pharmaceutical government-corporate conglomerate. Pharma cannot help itself. Like the scorpion it lies because it cannot stop from being a lying industry. The medical industry, being a part of it, cannot stop itself from being itself, and constantly deceive and lie as well.

So, why do we believe this covid scare has any integrity, especially when it derives from a creation of two well known lying sources?

Read some of my posts regarding my brushes with dangerously stupid doctors.

There is no way there is not lying at some level in all this chain of political doctoring. I would estimate there is gross deception at most levels and slight deception in the rest: deception through and through.

“How reality based is May 1st Kelyanne?”, asked the reporter.

Conway replied, “For some places it certainly can be a reality, if testing is available, if your infection rates are low, your death rates are low, if low hospital capacity is there, including ventilators and medical personnel beds, beds in the ICU. All that is taken into account because the President has made…”

The President has made numerous assumptions from liars in big pharma and the failed CDC, or Trump is part of the deceptive seizing of control over everyone.

Conway’s answer would be more correct if she injected the variable of dishonesty pharma and medicos cannot help but repeat.

Her answer would read, ‘For some places, but not really, if testing is available and the professionals don’t lie  and hospital administrations don’t lie; if your infection rates are not lies or fraudulent under fear of being fired; your death rates due to heart failure, diabetes, “flu” signs and symptoms, influenza, are not reported as the real causes; if hospitals are allowed to transform units to serve the needs of the ill, instead of laying off staff in other care units; if low hospital capacity means cool photo opportunities and propaganda pictures are good; if low hospital capacity can be hidden as a reality, if low hospital capacity can be underreported or not reported at all, then we can certainly let non-victims of covid-19 media melee live their lives…..

I could go on and on.

Democrats should surely believe this because the attacks on Trump from dem/libs for three years, is thatTrump is not qualified or he is absolutely corrupt. Suddenly, to democrat party supporters, Trump has credibility. Why? Is it because the media is giving credibility to the lying medicos and CDC losers-at-every-challenge?

I am speculating regarding where and who. The reality is the medical professionals are liars because they are part of a big conglomerate deception. So, all the conditions Conway lists are inapplicable because the numbers are dead wrong fabrications from an incorrigible source: big pharma, medical industry and government losers.

There is no reality to anything coming from the media regurgitating lies from sources everyone knows are ravaging liars. How many people have been killed in the last 20 years by medico error, millions?

20,000 deaths due to covid is a drop in the bucket compared with medical error deaths. If pharma and medicos care not for the millions who have died, what makes anyone, including lying loser liberal media, think they care for the lives they are taking now? 

We are deceived, blatantly lied to about global warming. How is it possible that it snows when it is 37 degrees?

Again, only to the naiive and trusting drones do these two signs of totalitarianism seem disconnected. To those who intend to rule and “cleanse” “their” earth, these are connected because they made it so.

Last night, April 15th, I stepped outside and discovered it was colder than I thought. I went back into the house and looked at my phone. The weather report said it was 50 degrees. I walked over to my window where there is a thermometer and read it at 45 degrees. I took out a thermometer and walked outside away from the house and vehicles, and set it on a tree stump, the back insulated from the stump with a dry cloth.

When I looked ten minutes later the thermometer read 45 degrees.

Why are we being lied to about weather? Who is doing it?

Remember people who lie have to lie to cover something they cannot report or state with surety of truth.

Is it all just a mistake. One day last year it snowed in Murray at 39 degrees.

Has snow changed? If so, why has it not been studied, investigated and reported? No conclusions are forthcoming. Maybe there are no conclusions because the conclusions do not support the political agenda of global warming and apocalyptic meltdown.

Covid sure helps distract from this but by the summer’s end, mid August, the global hoaxers will claim this has been the warmest year on record, for 10 years in a row, now. Morons, killing people.

HOW DOES ONE EXPLAIN THE EXTREMELY COLD 2020 WINTER AND UNUSUALLY COLD MONTH OF MARCH?

HOW DOES ONE EXPLAIN THE EXTREMELY COLD 2020 WINTER AND UNUSUALLY COLD MONTH OF MARCH?

How does one explain the extremely cold winter of 2020 and unusually cold month of March?

I call it Covid-19 distraction. Is anybody talking about oceans rising when the so-called extreme heat is gone and the cold makes the ocean level drop? It doesn’t actually do that, nobody has shown how silly climate-change hoaxing observations connect to unobserved causes.

How do dem/libs explain this unusually, very long cold spell? Covid-19, distraction. Is anybody talking about record high temperatures when we have had years of declining average temperatures, and this spring is the coldest we have experienced in decades? The average daily highs for every day in March were 10 to 20 degrees below average. Nobody has shown how silly climate change observations connect to never shown claims of effects.

How do some people explain the quiet, almost non-existent claims that we, the human race and the world have only 7 years to reverse this “heat” and climate change? Covid-19, distraction from reality.

To most people politics is not involved in everything. Most people cannot accept that there are people who will kill, slaughter, lie cheat and steal for gain. Politicians, the democrats in Congress, exploited a politically-fabricated situation and added a fat juicy raise for themselves and their minions, the unelected, non-governmental agencies and democrat/liberal/progressive institutions the democrats need to feed to stay in power.

Politicians connect all these issues and fools refuse to see how one seemingly unrelated distraction is actually the effect of a different cause from the same source.

Again, it is all politics.

Covid-19 does not exist except where it has been reported and effects of different causes have been used.

Governor Cuomo and “fredo”, his mentally deranged, goofy brother reporter suddenly started telling the truth?

Liars lie, they always lie.

There are numerous links in reporting cause of death.

When a person goes into an emergency waiting room and fills out forms there is a lull, a wait. S person in very difficult situations would be seen as in dire need and rushed to care. A person with a gunshot wound, for example, bleeding, potentially close to passing, is observed and rushed. Covid-19 “sufferers” are not seen in emergency rooms as dire need cases. The “victim” fills out forms and waits, unless of course breathing is difficult, dire need potential of dying.

A wait ensues if there are cases ahead. Eventually a doctor sees the patient but if not in emergency surgery the doctor follows protocol. Asks questions, checks lymph nodes, looks in eyes, ears, throat, checks temperature (usually nurse does that) and prescribes a “cold” remedy. The case is then reviewed and assumed Covid because the doctors are instructed, in many states and regions, to “play it safe”. Play iy safe presumptions are lazy ways of claiming overload and a political agenda. To politicians all things, all issues and calamities are connected. They are connected by politicians’ lies. But, not all politicians lie and see connections. We call these few politicians, representatives.

The third link is follow up. So many have died of covid-19, the claims report, but again, there is never a link shown and the fact is usually just a claim. Have the 8,000 or so deaths, due to covid-19, been proven as a result of covid-19, by autopsy?

The fourth link, hospitalization just in case, just to observe, and assume it is covid-19. LIES presented as physical reality, therefore presented as truth of another infection. LIES, tricks by liars.

All death is by cardiac arrest. Pneumonia causes constricted oxygen flow, and the brain and heart die. The brain can die and the body survive, if the heart keeps pumping. Covid-19 does not cause anything that makes cardia arrest. Covid-19, a ghost virus, is said to cause flu-like symptoms, which means it is a flu. A person who shows signs of carina arrest, and then has a heart stoppage, is actually in cardiac arrest. It is not kidney failure.

How many people in New York city, for example, have not died of flu because it is presumed, by a dishonest politician and his corrupt brother reporter, at a fake news agency, both “working” together (Cuomo brothers) to create an effect they cannot show is actual and cannot show is a result of the cause a handful claim exists?

The CDC can throw a picture of a “virus” and claim it is anything. Who knows the difference? Are CDC scientists like global hoaxing scientists? Maybe they are the same people who present observations and show no connection to an effect they claim exists?

Are people actually dying of this ghost-virus covid-19? No.

Quo bono? Always look for crime where someone benefits. Politicians have America in lock-down, destroying our lives and pursuit of happiness, and they gain, by writing fat raises for themselves and their supporters: fake representative processes they feign.