Original publication on SLC Craigslist, June 15, 2016, in response to a post by Utardia, a “writer”, regurgitator of marxist/liberal climate dogma.

The burden of scientific proof rests with the prosecution. There is two basic results of science: proving a theory or hypothesis, or failing to prove a theory or hypothesis.

Utardia, that dimwit lying crap-superstar, claims I need to provide proof. Is that proof of a negative? Is that proof that where I stand exists?

A tradition is immovable until it is movable, by something new, and obvious. Global hoaxing, I mean warming, is magnificently NOT obvious, except to dictatorial goons making big bucks off others’ fears, and obvious to bogus scientists extrapolating something from clearly NOTHING. When I say nothing I mean no data, no pre-test, no post test, no control group, no measurements, but lots of polluting and “reinterpreting” standard, immovable data.

It is all a fraud, a lie based on imaginary demons and fire breathing dragons, heating up the world. Where are the dragons other than the nether reaches of political scientists’ ever-augmenting ethereal interpretations of imaginary science from cosmological shock troops?

I might add that all those innumerable “climate scientists” do not exist. There are writers galore, political puppets who quote each others’ papers and stories of studies.

“The oceans will rise by 20 feet by the year 2015”, 144,000 Witnesses of Jehovah will be taken heavenward in 1918, I mean 1933, I mean 1975, I mean 1999, I mean okay who is this Jehovah guy”? “The climate system will kill millions by 2012”. Pictures of moose dying, deserts and dead fish on the shores all cause world-wide stench by 2010”. Obama will turn back the rise of the oceans by shear will power.

Some will argue he did it. Then why do we need anything else? Why do we need political exertion, taxation and subservience to the democrat party and liberals when obama can do it all?

Come on people, the oceans have not risen, temperatures have dropped. It is colder today, it cools off at night, and summers are shorter. Fewer people die from heat waves today than they did 20, 30 and 40 years ago.

We stand on solid ground of tradition. Somebody designed a thermometer well over a century ago, and that same thermometer is the standard.

What is the standard?

Water boils at 212 degrees at sea level, and freezes at 32 degrees. There is no change in that. That is the standard. Who will challenge that? Who would even think that this fact is not one of the world’s most reliable templates? 

Why do global hoaxers, I mean warmers, even attempt to change these standards?

We can always make new thermometers at the boiling point, and and it is still the standard because it is still the boiling point and we design and change OURSELVES to that fact.

Global hoaxers, I mean warmers, have been trying to change We, the People, and reality to their inconsistent and shifting predictions. They have no standards because they are sloppy, pretentious, anti-science comic-cons. Where is the data?

Data is not data unless it has a standard and a means of measuring preconditions and new, or changing conditions. This is science, the beginning of science.

How do we measure time? We measure it by change. We make a 24 hour day of a time frame between sunrise and another sunrise. We don’t dictate that we want 24 hours in a day, and make the planet rotate different. But that is the approach global hoaxers, I mean warmers, have taken.

We do not look at the sunrise and try to slow it down so we can have 25 hour days. That is ludicrous. It borders on insanity if not full blown lunacy. But that is what global hoaxers, I mean warmers, are trying to do with no data, no pre-test, no post-test, no measurements, and no sea level markers. They have not even tried to present this simple experiment because it is a failure every time.

Surely, somewhere along the way, maybe 10 years ago, maybe 20 or 30 years ago, someone, a real scientist, must have surely stuck a stick in the water and measured ocean levels regularly to show ocean-level rise. Why has no scientist presented this data? Would this data be irrefutable if it could be found to show a rise in ocean levels? Absolutely, and I would concur. But there is not one single reference to a stick in a rock anywhere? Absolutely nothing! NOAA, for example, has absolutely nothing that represents a stick in a rock, or anything an intellect could imagine and design to measure change.

So, I ask, are oceans rising? Surely it must be obama that stopped the rise, with just his word.

How much did it rise before he made the promise? ZERO! That was a  pretty safe bet for him, was it not.

It must be zero, otherwise dem/lib politico/scientists would have shown us. NOTHING!

The burden of proof is always on the upstarts, the new science, the new theories and hypotheses.

I am a cop, standing in the middle of the street, directing traffic. Who will argue that traffic flows at my standard, stable, already existing presence?

It takes a pre-test to assert the variables for the study, and it takes measurements of some sorts (maybe time lapse of driver response due to traffic officer’s directions, as compared to time lapse when traffic officer is not present).

You see, dear reader, the burden of proof is not only on the new science, or new theory or new hypothesis to show a change, but it is a heavy burden to first show the standards by which change will be measured and then presented as illuminating.

There is nothing obvious in dem/lib global hoaxing, I mean warming, except the raging lunacy of pseudo-scientists fabricating fear and catastrophe from lunatics’ imaginations, all done for money.

It is not my burden to provide truth to an existing science. The burden of proof, in science and almost everything, lies solely with the party making new claims or challenging established thought and tradition. The burden of proof lies with those trying to show change. Science is change, measurable change. If it is not measured there is no data, no measurable change and, hence, no science.

Global hoaxing, I mean warming, is the new claim of change, without a shred or attempt to show the change.

I see it this way. When I was a boy, some days when I would arrive at home after school I would walk in the door and smell baking. Imagine I walked in the house, and my mother says, “do you smell that?” Smell what, I ask. “The baking bread, she replies.” No.

“Well, I smell it and it is good”, she claims. Hmmm I do not smell anything.

“No matter”, she says, “will you wash the bread pans please?”

What bread pans? “The ones I baked the bread with”, she she says.

Ok, I guess you see bread pans.

“Of course I do”, she emphatically states, “right there on the counter by the sink.”

Okay, I believe you. Here I am, washing bread pans.

When I am finished washing imaginary bread pans, I sit at the kitchen table and my mother then places an empty plate before me and says, “enjoy the freshly baked bread”.

Okay mom.

In this anecdote, would you think my mother had lost something? Why do global hoaxers try the same with you and I? Are they insane or dishonest?

Global hoaxing, I mean warming, has the burden of proof, and that is why it fails so miserably. There is not even an attempt to provide pre-test conditions, post-test, hypothesis. My mother could have placed store-bought bread on plate, and tried to convince me she had baked it. Without the pre-test conditions: aroma of freshly baked bread, used bread pans and flour on the counter, I am not convinced. The global hoaxing, I mean warming, community, that does not exist except in papers by writers, tries the same. They show nothing with which a comparison, or change can be made.

I come home from school occasionally to the smell of freshly baked brread, and that is a change from the day before, and many days prior. Where is the change in the global hoaxing, I mean warming, claims?

Do we remember our science projects in grade school? The lab paper had a section for observation.

Today’s global hoaxers, I mean warmers, cannot even present “observations”. They make all kinds of claims and protests. Well, they try to present observations but any so-called observations I have investigated are always observations of something else, they claim is connected to itself. They present fear, based upon imaginary dragons fabricated for pseudo-scientists’ financial gain; fabricated by monster-imagining writers.

After the fact observations are nothing if there is no pre-fact observations. The global hoaxers never provide pre-test observations, only claims.

Where are the observations, measurements, standard by which change can be observed?

How can global hoaxers, I mean warmers, make observations without anything to observe, and how can they draw conclusions without anything to observe taken from nothing presented? There is an incredible lack of connection in all this global hoaxing “concluding” without establishing and observing.

Did the morons, for example, observe dying polar bears? Where?

Did the boneheads observe a rise in the sea level of the stick in the rock on the shore? Did the rock move? Did the boneheads move the rock? Who would do such a grievous assault on science, fact and truth itself? Liars, with a political motive. Welcome to global hoaxing!

It is not my responsibility to prove another’s theory wrong, it is the party challenging established thought and tradition that is responsible for proving truth and credibility of his or her claims and theories. Until he or she provides data, measurements, clinical and or laboratory work, the theories remain theories.

The change of scientific belief is not a fact until it is actually factual. All the global hoaxers have is fear, fabrication, and quoting other’s fears and fabrications: all for money.

The NOAA site is a fantasy of global hoaxers, I mean warmers, continually augmenting fear from fear, and from third party fear and fabrication. It is easy to see when they start talking in circles.

Science is proved, often, when scientists and the free market are convinced. I have used the invention of the rifle as an example.

When rifling was first theorized and explained, denying a better flight by a rifled bullet compared to a musket ball was accepted. That is science. After obvious proofs and evidence: observations of rifle accuracy compared with musket accuracy, denying rifles provide a better, more accurate flight, was considered rifling denial. The deniers did not last long. They were killed in the battle lines because they refused to adapt to the science: the proof by observing pre-test and post-test. They refused to change their views to fact and reality.

It is logic retardation that dimwit utardia tries to present nothing to the public as a rational argument. Global hoaxing presents observation-less observations: unsubstantiated claims.

Again, where are the observations? Where are the obvious results, of something, anything, even attempts to lie or deceive?

We are not asking for fear mongering, predictions, models or quotes from others without the necessary facets of science. We want observations and the obvious, nothing else will do. We want IRREFUTABLE science.


10,883 out of 10,885 is not 97 percent.

Written by scientists or dem/libs?

So there are two scientists of dissenting opinions?

Only two? What are their names?

That is so funny. These morons expect people to believe there are two that don’t believe global warming is a hoax?

I thought the number was 97 percent.

If these buffoons are going to lie, at least get the lies close to accurate.

Out of 10,885 “scientists” (laugh), 97 percent would be 10,558.45m, leaving 27 dissenters. Where did the other 25 go? Did they vanish, with the 10,883, or did they not exist to begin with, like the 10,883 global hoaxers, I mean warmers?

Do I seem afraid to look at this objectively, honestly, rationally?

Really, tell us which lie it is, 97 percent of all democrat party-paid scientists agree, or is it that only two don’t agree?

Ask your doctor if paying him or her for services not rendered is right for you. Ask your doctor if paying for services not rendered is right for him or her. Ask your global hoaxer, I mean warmer if your sacrifice but not his/her/its, is right for the planet.

That’s too funny. Such a boring moronic conflict of interest this site has never seen, and it can only come from a lunatic liberal from la-la-land.

10,883 scientists?

What are their names?

That is funny. Really, who are they? Are they nameless fabrications from the lunatic leaps of the lost in la-la-land liberal mind?

Which mind? Who collected the names?

Who did the survey?

Where is the survey information?

Anyone that sponsors a survey wants the information published. Where is the survey?

Where is the publication?

Where is the list of names?


Tell us. Is there a list in Scientific American?

Is there a list of names in Popular Science?

Is there a list of names in who’s making money from the dem/lib trillion dollar stimulus?

Anybody that expends that much effort, to survey that many people, certainly knows their reputation and credibility are questionable until the burden of proving their hypothesis is correct.

At the worst they want their information published or it is nothing.

Where is the raw data?

Who are these “scientists”?

Ok, maybe a different approach would work.

Who are the two that do not agree?

Where can we find them?

You see, dear reader, the liberal rats will not even mention their names because we would see a whole community of consistency, opposing global hoaxing, I mean warming.

You can go to and see the names of the 31,487 scientists who agree, global hoaxing, I mean warming, is a hoax.

Oh, but wait. If we give the loser-libbies, the math retards, another chance maybe we can find the 10,883 lost global hoaxing, I mean warming, scientists that agree.

Petition lists 31,487 scientists. The total is 31,487.

If we add the 10,883 to that number we have 42,372 scientists who believe global warming/climate change is a hoax. Please, serve yourself with rfact, truth, and reality. Go to the site and pick a nam. You will find a real person, while the 10,883 cannot be found, except for a handful I mention in a different commentary.

Of these 10,883 who “believe” in peter pan….I mean never-never land, I mean global hoaxing, I mean, math, a little over 200 of them, actually exist and can be found on the list of the la-la-land liberal 10,883 consensus of science. How solid, is that consensus if 200 of 10,883 exist? Hmmm, let’s do the math, real science:  about 2%.

The consensus is worth about 2% of reality, truth and integrity. That barely meets the requirements for margin of error, much less margin of correct hypothesis or theory, or science.

Boy, this new math by these liberal super intellects, is tough.

In fact, the percentage is not even close. In fact the percentage that believe is less than 50 percent, making the loser libbies, AGAIN, the VAAAAAAAAST minority.

Woo hoo, that’s close to 97 percent, if we take a 300 percent margin of error.

Margin of error: a little tough for poopy pantser utardidiot to figure out. A normal scientific margin of error is about 2 to 4 percent: unless you are a dem/lib peter pan.

Really, he could fly, if he existed. Hmm, existence, kind of a big, important factor.

The loser libbies, taking a mid range margin of error of 3%, are off by more than 33 times a normal margin of error, 33 times as much as their own margin of actuality.

WOW! That is some kind of nightmarish math.

But, tell us why the global hoaxers, I mean warmers, want our compliance.

Tell us why the global hoaxers, I mean warmers, want We, the People to surrender OUR rights and freedoms, OUR hard earned cash, cars and heated homes?

And to whom do they want these things surrendered, to those who have not given up these monstrous planet-killing toxins?

This dem/lib, progressive/bolshevik hypocrisy is deadly when we consider that 300 million Americans could be out of heat for the winters ahead, while the global hoaxing, I mean warming, pigs live lives of luxury and warmth.

It is potential genocide, by a bunch of math-retarded psychos.

And if their math is so bad in plain sight, how bad is all their math?

Maybe the reality is that we have global cooling. Trends, 30,000 scientists, common sense and reality indicate cooling.

Cartoons, fabrications with cool lines and colors, and lies do not make truth.

Fabricating numbers that do not match does not make truth or fact.

Again, who are these 10,883 scientists? What are their names? I crack me up.

Show us the list. How about utardia just show us a reference to the survey or company that collected the “data”?

Who did the survey, NOAA that cannot get the terminology correct? Morons!


If I could draw a cartoon I would draw two white, old, men Hillary and moochelle oafama, riding a donkey backwards, claiming they are the 97 percent that “believe” global hoaxing, I mean warming, is an accurate science. The caption would be, spoken by hillary, of course, “we knowed it is currect, because we knowed it.”

Too funny, and of course, being consistent with dem/lib theology, a cartoon that insults democrats, liberals and global hoaxers, I mean warmers, makes the claim true.

Woo hoo. I win!


We can all go home now, and turn up the heat, fire up those muscle cars, and throw our dem/lib neighbors into the streets to freeze in the “warm” winters (but not the deep freeze every year in the north east- it never happens).

If we were to stop the political/global elite from heating their homes and driving cars, the carbon print would drop massively. The is a very big return on investment, and we would beat global hoaxing, I mean warming.

YAY. We all win, and the dem/libs get what they want for others, for themselves: that they try to force upon others, not themselves.

NOT on my watch, you filthy pigs!


Hi neighbors, utardia, agent provocateur reporting in for the week.

Damn! I am sorry for missing my goals and quotas last week.

I did not get my quotas so I don’t get my bonuses for exposing conservatives, republicans and tea party representatives. Yeah, I know, those representatives that have tried to re-institute real representation; those rascally republican tea-baggers are still around doing, of all crazy things, representative government.

It just makes me sick that I did not get my $6 bonus for thinking big for the week.

It just makes me sick that I did not get my good neighbor award for attacking republicans, conservatives, and the self-governing representative system of those boneheaded Constitutional Republicans.

Crap, I did not get my honesty and truth bonus of $500 for telling enough lies.

I am beside myself that I didn’t get my love of humanity bonus for slaughtering un-born babies this week.

I am also quite mad that I did not get my dystopian imagination award and bonus for fabricating 10 new lies and stories about conservatives and tea party representation. Crap, I could use that extra roll of toilet paper for all the crap I swim in.

Does anyone have a snorkel I can borrow?


Inconsistencies in dem/lib/progressive/eugenicist propaganda regarding global warming.

I do not use that word, propaganda, lightly.

To propagate something is is to create propaganda, but specifically, the unspoken meaning of words, particularly, the word “propaganda” is that propaganda includes an element of deception.

The panacea of global warming is a massive fraud.

To apply “global warming”, or the new co-option, “climate change”,  as the cause for almost everything that the propaganda agents fabricate, is to defer the scientific method, finding cause of effect, and making change. It is tantamount to using a nuclear weapon for a mosquito problem.

First of all, global warming is undefined. It is indefinable, by design. It is an over-generalization meant to cover everything the dem/lib/progressives decide to control.

No matter where we go; no matter what we read or hear, global warming “specialists” pop up with indictments for nothing but fabricated causes, unrelated results and completely disconnected solutions.

On craigslist rantsandraves, in Salt Lake City, one liberal “writer” continues to accuse every incident of weather and democrat party distrust and rejection, on the big bad wolf of global warming.

The big bad wolf, of lore, was never a wolf. What was the wolf? What is the wolf?

The vampire, the killer in the myths does not exist. There never was a vampire. There is no such thing as a vampire (well, except democrat politicos sucking the life and blood out of America). Democrat politicos and liberals is the closest thing to a real vampire in existence. I am tempted to state boldly that even democrats are NOT vampires per se, but who knows for sure how many lives the clintons have personally taken. Maybe they have even drunk the blood of their victims. The big bad wolf is a metaphor but vampirism and satan worship are not myths.  Even though satan the being may not exist as myth claims, Satan worship is not a myth. Vampirism is not a myth either. Histories of 

I remember a picture of butcher-billy-bob clinton hugging a woman in Kosovo. The story is that she was part of a blood sacrifice the following evening and clinton, master mahan clinton, did the sacrifice.

Our local utardia, moron blames everything on global warming, but that does not solve the problem.

It is not intended to solve fabricated problems, proven simply by the fact that the dem/libs offer only political solutions to problems that do not exist. The big bad wolf is a fabrication placed in the minds of unsuspecting victims by others, those who want control of the victims. How are the victims identified? The solutions are never problem related, indicating an agenda supra to the fabricated problems of global hoaxing.

I could refer to an innumerable examples dem/libs present for which the causes are amazingly disconnected.

Our local moron, not so local, an agent working Utah and other locales, admittedly, living over 2,000 miles away, posted an article on Stephen Hawking stated, to paraphrase, ‘the release of CO2 from the ocean floor would elevate temperatures to about 250 degree’.

Who is responsible for that CO2 release? How is that CO2 release my problem or a result of my actions, in any way? Yet, the monster fabricator claims I need to submit to democrat party rule with no cause-and-effect connection: no reason why. How are these two entities related? Obviously, and logically, they are not, but in the minds and fabrications of dem/libs they are related.

They are related by effect but not cause. They are related by the effect of extracting my compliance using a tool of rhetoric, deception, or outright fraud, whichever you want to call it.

it does not matter what cause the dem/lib frauds use, the effect is always submission to democrat party/liberal rule. I am not talking about submission to democracy, or rule of law. I am not making a reference in the least to submission to or participation in Constitutional Republic, self-governance.

When I use the word rule, it is more closely associated with tyranny, despotism, dictatorship, and murderous oppression. This is what the dem/libs offer. If it is not obvious by their use of words, it must obvious in their avoidance of words such as Constitution and representation, and terms such as rule of law, self-governance, and Bill of Rights.

The effect is always centralized rule, taking away our rights to individual decision making and individual opportunity.

The big general “global warming” hoax is designed specifically to give tyranny an excuse to oppress and rule. This is slavery.

But where are the connections to the problems? There are none. Returning to the example of the Hawking claim that the earth will experience 250 degree heat, and doing some research, we discover Hawking never made that statement. In my search for that claim I found no reference by Hawking, at all, to global warming. Hawking, being a scientist, or at least a mathematician, could not, in a scientific vein of integrity, make such a claim.

Surely Hawking understands scientific methodology of proving or disproving a theory or hypothesis.

Surely Hawking would know that an immeasurable CO2 quantity at the bottom of the ocean could NEBVER be traced to the effect dem/libs continually propagate: democrat party rule without opposition or dissent.

What is the actual cause of this fabricated CO2 release?

Why does the dem/lib effect only include a deflection from the undefined problem, the cause of CO2 release? Why does the dem/lib effect avoid the cause of this mysterious CO2 build-up, and the necessity of compliance to democrat party compliance? Is there a real cause or is it a causal claim only?

Should we define the problem of global warming we might be able to attack the causes.

Sticking to the posted, fabricated claim, what is the cause of CO2 release?

If it were dry ice sinking to the bottom of the oceans, releasing CO2 that binds to sediment or rocks down there, then how could we stop dry ice from sinking to the bottom of the ocean, and where and how is this dry-ice created and transported to the ocean? If dry ice were transported to the oceans, would it not dissolve on the way? Why an how does CO2 get to the bottom of the oceans and from where did it spring into existence. The idea that CO2 can be released from the bottom of the ocean is not as far-fetched and ludicrous, lunatic in fact, as to how the CO2 got to the bottom of the ocean? Is CO2 a gas? Does a compound in a gaseous state not rise in water?

Do not expect logic in anything the global warming/climate change writers fabricate. Yes, I used the word writers. I have not found a scientist doing an experiment or measuring a thing related to climate or weather in any of the articles I have dissected from IPCC, NASA, NOAA, AAAS, WMO, or other related pretenses.

What has caused, if we assume even the most insane fabrication to be exemplified, the “gathering” or build-up of CO2 on the bottom of the ocean? Can the pretentious, deleterious effect be reversed? That would be a start to cause-and-effect science and problem solving. But the dem/libs do not want their fabricated problems solved. If they did their claims would include measurements, data and and presumptions, such as one would find prepared as a theory or hypothesis. Nothing is ever forthcoming, except attacks and emotional manipulation.

They do not even want their fabricated problems discussed, hence the deflective and childish ramblings from the discussions.

But let us take this pretense even further. Suppose there actually is a build up of CO2 on the bottom of the ocean: setting aside the deceptive and manipulative impossibility spontaneously springing to threatening proportions,  by this utardia traitor. Suppose we set aside the insanity of claiming something for which there is no data and something for which data cannot even be acquired; what is the cause and how can it be reversed, if that is the goal? 

When global warming is broken down it is obviously not about reparations to the planet.

CO2 emissions from the ocean floor are going to cause 250 degree temperatures, according to global hoaxers pretending to quote Stephen Hawking. HOW?

According to scientists pretending to listen to a fellow “peer-reviewed” guy, pretending, the ocean floor will release CO2 and will cause major catastrophes, 250 degree temperatures are not life threatening, rather life terminating, immediately. Who went to the ocean floor and ensured CO2? Who discovered a change in CO2 levels on the ocean flor? Who measured change, and developed a pattern showing an increase oi CO2 levels of ocean floor pretense? Who did anything, except manipulate fear to force compliance to a ghost on the bottom of the oceans?

The problem; the weird thing about this impending catastrophe, is that CO2 emitted is the earth’s problem, not mankind’s problem. I thought the whole global hoaxing challenge was to stop man’s destructive impact on the climate, but CO2 escaping from the ocean floor, as Hawking states (or is falsely accused) cannot be directly, oddly or even mysteriously connected to anything mankind or any person may have done, especially to such a degree as to affect the whole world.

If so destructive, so potentially devastating to end all life, why are scientists right now, not trying to stop the devastating effect? If 250 degrees is projected, as the dem/lib hoaxers claim, then that is the biggest problem in the world, not man. Will global hoaxer utardia rally mankind? What scientists are addressing this sacrosanct event and who is doing something about it, or is it silly? Maybe we should make a hundred billion tons of concrete and pour it in the oceans to seal the bottom of the ocean from releasing CO2?

The insanity is that the dem/libs are doing what tyranny always does, and they want the same results: total control of all people. There is nothing new to tyranny’s cries for unification to fight an unseen enemy, along with massive surrender of rights and wealth to the criers.

They, the global inciters, hope you, We, the People forget that we are being led to do the same things others in other civilizations have done in the slide to slavery.

We are given only drips of information so we can be convinced the science is there but invisible and/or difficult because of the slow acquisition of data and knowledge, that never materializes.


How sad. Except that is not the Muir glacier.

I also did search for Greenpeace in Svalbard. Never happened.

End of story.

There are no United Nations scientists. Can psycho (craigslist utardia) name one? No, never has, never will. Utardia (The pig-shit eater) has tried to fool us that a few names here and there, of people in universities or notable positions, are scientists, but they are not. It is that simple. Check for yourselves, as I have.

There is no scientific global climate community. There are a few writers that lie and post pictures of things other than they describe. There are a few reporters in far away countries that cannot be reached to confirm they are even distantly associated with the global hoaxers. There are frauds that allow their names to be used and there are numerous others who have no idea their names and identities are being stolen and used by the few, unidentifiable writers of global hoaxing.

Like I have stated before. The writers of the articles and “warnings” on NOAA, AAAS, WMO,, and some of the “dire warnings”, are writers, and that is all.

The writer of craigslist posts, “Missing signs of climate in an epic flood”, and, “Scientific evidence for warming of the climate system is unequivocal.”, is the SAME “person”.

When I write that there is only a few “people” writing these articles and fabricating the innumerable lies, it is quite possible it is only one “person”

Look at the syntax, the vocabulary, the odd sentence structure of all these articles and posts. It is one source only. The global hoaxing community is a handful of lying dem/libs. That’s it. That is all there is to this “community”.

Even the moron that posts here in SLC simply copies and pastes from his/her/its own weird and disjointed, fraudulent fabrications already posted on one of these sites and from other CL locales. In addition, everything is a lie.

Again: one study; one experiment by a legit scientist; one piece of data; one measurement; one bloody hint at someone doing something even closely related to the scientific method of proving or disproving an hypothesis; maybe a formal hypothesis or a wonderment by a real scientist in a real scientific publication: any of this might lend 1% credibility to the bogus, ABSOLUTELY BOGUS, FABRICATED CLAIMS OF THIS MORON AND HIS/HER/ITS RAMBLINGS ON THESE NON-EXISTENT-SCIENTIST SITES.

There is a Muir Glacier in Alaska, but it is classed as a Little Ice Age glacier. It started retreating in the 1780’s. Yes, it is well documented that the retreat was caused by automobile exhaust, in 1780, from utardia’s clap-trap-yap. Greenpeace rode the waves into utardia’s mouth to actually do the research. It is documented at:

Ice age glaciers melt.

Ice melts, in case that moron has forgotten that ice is frozen water: H2O, dihydrogen monoxide, a deadly substance responsible for thousands of deaths in the U.S. every year. It should not be inhaled.

If Greenpeace has no reason to “document” a Little Ice Age glacier doing what Little Ice Age glaciers do, MELT, then where is the significance in anything true about this glacier? There is only significance when utardia and the lying liberal extremists fabricate fear to manipulate the masses. Revolutions kill people. That is what these disturbed, ethically-retarded dem/libs want.

The fraud and deception of this absolute butt-hole, lying cretin, utardia is unbelievable.

I have made some strong accusations and solid arguments but this bumbling boneheaded, biscuit brain cannot even rebut one. Moronic supremicus has not even tried.

Brent 3,209, utardia 0.

Has this moron no pride, no sense, no conscience?

What a moronic loser. Probably the geekiest whimp in school voted least likely to grasp reality, and voted most likely to become even more geekier.

What a loser.

A real question is, will this moron respond with something concrete to prove he/she/it is even human; has a job; or actually lives on this planet?

Really. I am quite cautious to not give away my personal information, having received scores of threats. I can beat any and all of them, but even I, supremicus, intelligentsi-smart-assius, lets my guard down and could be ambushed.

I have stated that I work, I live in the Murray Utah area, stop for coffee at Barnes and Noble in Murray, while this moron is nothing but an ethereal paper science fiction plagiarist. There appears to be nothing personable about this simpleton, utardia. He/she/it admitted he/she/it is over 2,000 miles away, assigned to work this area, and then tried to recruit me to silence me and raise the average IQ of all the dem/libs by 10 points. Raising the IQ of all dogs in the U.S., by adding my intellect is less of a gain, since dogs have higher IQs than the average dem/lib.

Seriously, kidding aside, this bolshevik agent tried to recruit me, telling me he/she/it could show me how to make money doing what I am doing. What a scum. Turn traitor for association with that pissy-pants wimp?

How sick would I have to be to do that? How desperate to be something, other than human, would I have to be to do the disgusting propaganda work of a treasonous bastard!

How does one describe such a sub-human with absolutely no potential for acquiring human characteristics? How does one; how can anyone, describe a thing that simply cannot tell a single truth, trying to deceive and manipulate others to believe the most insane, ridiculous, whacky, illogical, child-id mental-displacements?

How does one describe the evil of hatred for mankind in this moron’s mind that makes him/her/it lie with every statement made, to deceive and manipulate others to join the irrational world of liberal dementocracy? How does one describe this moronic state of languoring in liberal dementia-land?

So Obama’s (our) trillion dollar stimulus money was very poorly spent, paying an idiot/super geek to become a worse idiot and liar.

My gawd, how stupid does that make oafama sin laden?


As Arctic ice melts due to the NORMAL heat of SUMMER….

What a moron, utardia, writer on Craigslist.

Colder summers, colder winters, earlier falls, later springs, adds up to global hoaxing, not global warming.

They call it “climate change” now because if they had to call it “warming” they would have to defend their positions from everybody who knows the trends are cooling. They could call it pollution, what it really is, and that would direct resources to solve the real problems. As it is, the global hoaxers have no concerns for the real problems and real solutions: solutions that are definitely needed. They are more interested in compliance, oppression and control of We, the People, and lining their pockets as ignorant, deflective “expert” liars. They have the midas touch of turning other’s wealth into their own, by stealing through government. 

Global hoaxing is protectionism, the root of all tyrannies.

We are going into an ice age. Let us see if I can whip up the same fear and manipulation using the same tactics as the dem/lib hoaxers. I predict, in keeping with modern trends, that the earth will be in an ice age by  2750 ADHD. We can expect -300 degree temperatures and almost all life on the planet will be eliminated. We can expect to wake up very cold in the mornings, and when we look out the windows, we will not see the missing climate signals, that utardia left for our future use in 2750 ADHD.

When we look at the star placed above the squiggly lines and cool colors on my global hoaxer numbers chart x-axis versus un-measured temperature increases, on the y-axis, we see a really cool depiction of a pyramid. YAY, just what we wanted. It is quite pretty although there is a spot where we will have to change the results of our studies to make that left line a little straighter. Welcome to liberal la-la-land, global hoaxer-ville.

Most global hoaxers are so science-deficient and challenged they forget to leave one or the other axis off their “charts” and”graphs”. It is like not knowing enough to add flour to bake bread, and then claim it is baking. We witness, in every chart, claim, “news” report and post  more goofy fabricators left off their charts and science-ish models and projections.

Stephen Hawking was interviewed. When asked about climate change he stated, and I quote, “that utardia/scum-puppet, is a moron.”

It’s true. I read it in a “paper” about a consensus of scientists that consensussed together, panelling together to make a consensus of papers that claim the papers are consensus, regarding some scientists, a community of 32 million, that claim Stephen Hawking said just that.

This satire is probably much clearer to you, dear reader, than anything from utardia/scum-puppet/ weird dave/editor/predator, NOAA, WMO, NASA, and AAAS. We are wild and crazy global hoaxers, I mean guys.

Please, fellow Americans, lighten your lives with humor. Go to the aforementioned sites and read, from a perspective of science, the “stuff” they fabricate.

Imagine you are in your high school chemistry class and the lab instructor is introducing a lab experiment. Compare that experience to the fluff and stink of the sophist, pretentious, fraudulent words of the aforementioned sites.

I have made commentary, but I cannot cover it all.

Hawking continued, being the pure scientific mind he is, “All the evidence shows the earth is cooling, heat is escaping the planet in buckets, and I predict minus 100 degrees at the equator by 2750 ADHD.”

No, really, it is true. He actually said that. He consensussed with other global anti-hoaxers, in his usual scientific jargon. lol. Don’t you love, it, buckets? Funny?

Not much different than looking for missing climate of the Louisiana floods. Utardia concocted, “Searching for climate signals…”.

When was the last time “that thing next door, named climate, sent a signal? Was that his order by phone for pizza delivery?

“Climate signals”? that is too funny. 

Didn’t that moron utardia quote some source, hmmmmm, Hawking, who predicted 250 degree temperatures, like Mars, by 2050 because of CO2 emissions from the bottom of the ocean floor?

Is utardia that much of a moron!

When was the last time Hawking was on the ocean floor? When was utardia/political scum-puppet on the ocean floor? When was the last time anyone was on the ocean floor? When was the last time a god, was on the ocean floor, I mean except when he put frozen CO2 ice cakes down there, 250 billion years ago. Was utardia, that moronic dinosaur around then?

How much of fools does utardia take We, the People to be?

That mutt, for that presumption and morose attack on reality, deserves to swing.

It just takes one judge to issue a bench arrest for anyone of the thugs in power. We, the People will rally. We have seen it.

It just takes one!