Think about the garbage you let in your head every day.
Do you watch television? Do you have a favorite sitcom?
What is a sitcom? Situation comedy.
It is a regurgitation of lies from one episode to the next, from series to series, of people trying to get away with something by lying. Somehow pandemic dishonesty is funny, humorous.
The precept for every single sitcom episode is constructed around a lie. Have you not wondered about the consistencies in your lives every day? Are you happy associating daily with dishonesty, dishonest people and deception? Do you look forward to being like those poliwood losers, liars, frauds and extremely stupid “people”?
Someone told a lie, because we are all “just human”; someone tried to deceive a spouse, a family member, or the law, and got caught: and that is funny, day after day, after bloody boring, evil, repetitive episode, and this makes entertainment, humor??
Are you so sub-intellectual you are that easily “entertained”? Sitcoms are not entertainment.
“Modern Family”? Do “they” mean modern collection of dysfunctional idiots that lie and prey on the dumb, you? Do “they” mean morons with semi-intellectual thoughts, living unnatural lives, portrayed as “normal” or “modern”, all fabricated to a predetermined end, every bloody, boring, dishonest episode after episode?
Do you watch dishonest people at work, and find the deceptions funny, smart, intelligent, intellectually stimulating? Do you find it funny and entertaining when someone lies to you, manipulates you, or uses you, like your role models do in your favorite sitcoms?
Another prevalent theme is that men are socially inept, retarded, and challenged, and that it takes a) authority, b) a woman or c) a child to straighten the dumb man’s thinking and actions back to “normal”.
Please do not forget, they are all acting. Do you realize they all follow a premeditated script: a plan to connect effects (the end) to unnatural and disconnected causes?
There is a fabricated end and the means do not waver, although the script writes in a little bit of internal conflict, detraction.
The ending is never “normal”. Can you not see that these scripts are predetermined, for their gain, your loss and pseudo entertainment?
These are stupid people pretending to be smart.
Again, you are entertained by boring, droning, abnormal deception?
The scripts are written to show men are dummies, authority is pure, presumed innocent and smarter, and women are just a step below authority. Search maternal incest. Poliwood elevates everybody above the white male.
Authority is government, according to poliwood.
Which “Star Trek” series did you prefer? Are you insane? It is all fake: situation dramas in a studio, “sitdram” if you will, prefabricated to an end for their gain: repetition, curiosity, and false hope for you.
Who has been in space? Astronauts have been caught lying.
Nobody has been in space! It is all a construct.
Start looking, study the composites, the images and look for an actual photo. They don’t even try to call anything a photo. Even “pictures” of storms and hurricanes are graphics, computer generations and fancy drawings: drama in science. They admit it.
Nobody, not one single person has provided a photo of earth from space.
Think about it.
We, man, can dive to the Marianna Trench in specially built submarines with windows to see and take photos, done under incredible pressure. B,ut for some weird, strange reason nobody can make a window in a so-called space-craft, with all the technology available to us, to take a photo of earth from space.
And how did “they” determine there was such great resistance on “spacecraft” when re-entering the atmosphere, that it caused unbelievable heat? At the speeds “they” claim rockets re-enter, and in such a short sprint to the surface atmosphere, and beginning the descent in very thin air, how can friction from air molecules cause such great heat? How hot do jets get as they fly hundreds and, in some cases, thousands of miles per hour.
Has anyone seen a rocket hit velocity to leave the gravity of the earth? The levels of the atmosphere are:
troposphere: ground level
From the surface to the end of the thermosphere is approximately 400 miles, we are told.
How much resistance caused by particles of air and in the air would we find in the highest layer, where there is very very thin air? What affects the spacecraft’s re-entry?
Where are the formulae?
If there is no resistance in space, because there is no particles to interfere with movement, why do the spacecraft not open parachutes immediately upon hitting the thermosphere, or before?
What slows the rocket’s re-entry before the chutes are deployed? Air?
How does air stop a rock from falling? How does air stop or slow a bullet falling back to earth, and why does that bullet not melt?
Why has NASA never had aircraft high in the sky taking photos or video of “spacecraft” launching or settling?
There are no photos of anything. There are computer generations, drawing with colors, and models: drawings and computer generations.
There are composites, graphics, drawings and generated CGI. See for yourselves. Did Bozo-bezos or Shatner take a photo?
Back to the physics. I admit, I am speculating. What have you done?
400 miles to “space”, 300 miles of it in very, very thin air. So thin there is no way it causes even slight heat due to resistance of particulate.
A 100 mile drop to the surface remains. A “spacecraft” traveling at thousands of miles per hour spends only seconds in the 100 miles from the surface of the plane(t) to the troposphere.
Has anyone ever seen a calculation of heat due to friction? Where does one find friction coefficients for the very thin air political scientists theorize exists in upper atmospheric levels?
Could the outside pressure on a deep sea craft be any greater than the internal pressure that tries to force out a window in space? It is minuscule even without the comparison. Air, in a very tight small space produces very little pressure, no pressure comparatively to the pressure of hundreds of atmospheres in the depths of the oceans.
Oh, but “they” claim glass melts in re-entry. Nope!
There are all kinds of compounds science has produced to prevent melting.
Not a chance any of this gobbledegoop science is measured.
Could we, superior technology, not design glass to withstand high temperatures to take photos? Of course we can. Yet, none exists because “space, like everything you are fed, is a fallacy and fantasy: phantasy, phantasia and phantasm; not reality, a story; a phantom.
Even the most recent trip into “space”, Bozo-bezos and Captain James T. Kirk, of the ‘real” Starship Enterprise (William Shatner, an actor), went into space for “…a few seconds”.
But wait. No, they did not go into space. The most recent jaunt, with the greatest technological advances, could not go into space and could not take a single photo?
But wait, there is another element to this curiosity. How fast do missiles travel? Why is there no concern for their nose-cones melting, especially considering they travel as fast as “rocketships”, all in the denser parts of the atmosphere?
With all the technology; all the improvements in computers and controls and communications, they only managed a jaunt into the stratosphere, for a few seconds?
WAIT! Stratosphere, not space? YES! They did not make it to the thermosphere, the highest level of the atmosphere. They did not make it to the mesosphere either, barely left the surface, 30 miles at best.
The “NEWS” article in question, many, openly state the craft entered the stratosphere, only for a few seconds. No need for worries about heat, really. No mention of it. The stratosphere makes up only about 30 miles of the overall theorized 400 miles atmosphere, basically 8% of the theorized heights of the atmospheric strata.
All the dementocrats know the scams, they volunteered to exploit and violate, YOU.
I go into detail regarding some of the inconsistencies and lies, outright silly fabrications, of just about everything.
I have written and published, in this last incarnation of my site, over 580 articles. If it is all just silly opinion, like this commentary might be, then it is at least organized and professionally presented. I do have some credibility. As Mao stated, “There is a quality to quantity”, and nobody will argue that I have quantity.