Lucifer-sam writes, “Space is very big and, often, very weird.” Dufus, liar supreme sam continues, “Last week, an image captured by…”

What is an image?

An image? Captured? How does one capture an imagined non-sequitur?

Even nasa admits, every day, they have no actual photos or reality.

Please, take note that the words image and imagine have the same latin root word and mean, “less than real: circa 1200”, ”a piece of statuary; artificial representation that looks like a person or thing,” Also defined as, “reflection in a mirror” , early 14th century.

So a nasa image is either a reflection, an artificial representation, or less than real, but not real.

So nasa’s theories regarding distances are not real. The distance of one is dependent upon the unreal, artificial distances of others. All are dependent upon unreal, imagined, and superficial distances that not only cannot be substantiated, but cannot substantiate anything claimed to be in association. NOTHING is real.

Imagine means visualizing the unreal, “to create something in one’s mind.”

Not a shred of reality to NASA imagination, but who creates these nothings? Who portrays and depicts and represents these artificial creations? People, or “people” do this.

These image creators and liars are evil people, so devious and degenerate, they cannot be considered people or human.

One can see video, actual film, of rocket lift-offs, burning fuel and fire and brimstone; rockets lifting into the sky, perhaps 10 miles or 20 miles, but the connections of these obvious realities to “space”, is absolutely non-existent, and beyond the unknown distance of the cover of the atmosphere to where “space” begins, nothing is real.

I speculate regarding distances and heights. I am free to speculate because nobody, including nasa has a single measurement for substantiating anything.

Please find something! Find an equation or measurement nasa has measured, applied and used to calculate anything.

There is no film in existence of a rocket lifting into the atmosphere beyond what nasa actually allows to be filmed, and more nothing at heights greater than nasa’s allowances.

This is all luciferian black magic, sleight of hand. The rocket disappears from view and most people assume it goes into “space” because people are told that is what happens.

What is the height a rocket reaches before it is gone from view?

If nasa wanted to convince we the people that a rocket travels to “space”, why not use computer technology to direct a telescope to follow it, and get actual film footage? Because it does not happen as the luciferian liars claim.

Imagine you are beside the track, watching a bobsled pass. For how much time of that whole run of two minutes, do you actually see the bobsled go by?

When rockets are launched, for how long do you see any piece of video, as the rocket passes? Did you notice the “rocket” does not leave the visual? How can that be when it zooms past at miles per second? It is imagery, drawn, fabricated to give classically conditioned minds something to believe: fabrications of faith in nasa’s religion.

Unless you are in a craft, or a video camera is in a craft traveling with or following the rocket image, as shown in the video, a camera attached to a point high in the atmosphere, would see the rocket cross its view for a fraction of a second, not what the video shows. Again, what object traveling with the rocket filmed the video “image” of the rocket burning to “space”?

From :13 to :16, of the animation the rocket stays in view without change. Impossible:

Something such as a video camera or CGI animation, follows the so-called rocket into the atmosphere. As film, this video depiction is impossible, as the article states, depiction. Video depiction, as shown, is impossible unless two rockets are launched together, one to film the other.

At highest velocity, the luciferians claim, the rocket escapes the atmosphere traveling 14 miles per second, or 25,200 mph. Doing the math of space theory or atmosphere height theory, where would a video camera need to be to watch a rocket pass it while remaining in view for 4 seconds, without change in size or position? The video is totally bogus, fabricated, imagined and drawn with CGI. That is the only explanation.

Even at an average velocity of only 1/10th the escape velocity of 25,200 mph, the rocket should escape the atmosphere in a matter of seconds, clearly out of range of any constant view for more than a fraction of a second. I am sure one can calculate the velocity derived from so-called force, if one has the thrust measurements of so-called rocket engines.

I am not about to go this deep into the equation, formulae and theorized distance from earth to “space”. You find the equations and measurements nasa claims exist, and report back here. I contend that nothing of the sort exists.

How long does it take for the rocket to reach max velocity, is one question of the whole theory, never shown in full. NEVER!

Even at 1/10th escape velocity of 25,200 mph, it is impossible a rocket could travel without breaking up. You could not even imagine anything traveling at 2,520 mph. The Concorde hit speeds of 1250 mph.

Rockets, we are led to believe, hit maximum speed of 25,200 mph? The acceleration in a 300 to 330 mile window of the atmosphere, would create a g-force that would crush rocks strapped into seats. It is 105 miles per second, according to theory. According to theory, how fast does the world rotate?

Do not forget that the rocket travels at an estimated velocity, not a measured velocity. Nobody, nothing can measure that high speed.

All anybody ever really need do to dissect and thrash stupid nasa, “space” and “globe” theories is to think and ask questions. How do you know that? Can you show me the calculation?

Based on what is that theory or presumption? How does nasa know the escape velocity of any rocket they claim launches into “space”? How then, does nasa know what is needed to escape the atmosphere, and what is the true distance of the height of the atmosphere?

Nothing is known: not a single thing yet magically nasa produces images, depictions and other fake film and photos of disconnected “space”, “space” travel, and moon and sun theorizing.


Theory based on theory is still only theory and not reality.

I watched a video of someone talking about time travel and how it was related to the use of black holes. Has anyone seen a black hole?

Seriously, has anyone been to a black hole? Has anyone actually seen a black hole by looking into the sky?

Who has claimed to have seen a black hole?

Who has seen a flux capacitor? Who has seen a spaceship?

Who has taken a picture of the earth from the heavens?

Why no pictures?

We were shown a picture of the earth through a window in 1969, so the story, from a so-called expert, goes.

If “they” could put a window in a spaceship then it can be done now, so surely there must be a window in all the rockets launched since. What would it take to place an automated camera in position to take pictures?

You can find videos that debunk the 1969 earth picture as a drawing behind a window in a dark room.

Incidentally, it is the same picture of the earth we are shown all the time.

Now, before you go crazy, yes, you, not me myself; before you go off your deep end writing words in your mind I have not written, stop.

Did I, myself, say I was a flat-earther or are you saying it? Did I say I did not believe in science, as I pound keys on my laptop, or are you going to extrapolate an irrefutably stupid conclusion from the opposite of evidence?

Has anyone proved gravity is what “science” theorizes? Yes, gravity is still a theory.

I look at water as it pours from a faucet. Have you noticed that water in many instances separates as it drops. I am not talking about spray. I have not theorized regarding water not falling directly “down”.

If water separates there must be a force to push strands of water from each other. Is that, perhaps, the same force that drags water down?

So, am I anti-science or just wondering about what theory of gravity is correct or  close? Do you feel a need to attack me for wondering? Are you experiencing fear regarding your beliefs because I, myself, wonder? I do not have fears in wondering; wondering about anything. I can switch my views according to reality. Can you?

I was quite involved in religion many years ago. I believed the Bible to be the word of god and believed in a supreme being and, in fact three deities, God the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit.

My belief system was tied to a belief in the originator and origination of the sect.

My belief system included a belief that Jesus, the Christ, was the source of mankind’s conscience. I believed that to deny conscience, the source, would make a man drift towards anti-social disordered behavior: psychopathy or sociopathy.

But my belief system was undermined by some revelations and my research, and I totally quit that religion.

I completely gave up belief in a supreme being when I discovered that I controlled my conscience and my commitment to living by conscience was connected o my desire to remain a decent human being. Of course some will challenge, based on their hate-motivated, fear-originated ignorance, not mine.

For 16 years I was a non-believer in God.

Lately, however, I wonder, again.

Too many coincidences and study of the sources themselves of alternate theories, regarding the earth, history and the mind have prompted me to wonder, again, if there is some order to this world.

I have constantly called the theory of relativity into question. It is a mathematical theory, you do realize? Who, of the many people you know, has travelled at the speed of light? Nobody?

Do you remember a day when science theorized that to travel in a vehicle faster than 50 miles per hour one’s head would explode? You don’t remember that?

Do you remember a day when doctors made house calls and prescribed herbs? Do you remember a day when there were no such food additives and drugs, and chemicals in humanity’s lives?

Do you recall ads describing smoking as good? Do you remember the pilgrims coming to America with large lumbering cows, or did they bring goats?

No matter what Newton called it, an apple fell from a tree, he observed it, and gave it a name. Somehow gravity stuck.

What is the latinate root of the word gravity?

Latinate gravitatem, gravitas means weight, heaviness, pressure, from the root gravis, heavy.

What started this ponderance is still a theory, time travel.

All the science fiction movies, most of them absolutely stupid, are based upon theories, and that is it.

Even my favorite sci-fi, Blade Runner, is based upon a theory, space travel.

Of course, that is based upon a brief I have that we have no real evidence of space travel in man’s history.

I am convinced man did not go to the moon.

I am convinced that computers preprogrammed according to theories and models, in the 1960s, could calculate that which could barely be seen and mapped.

I do not believe a bank, a whole building, and whole and complete program using archaic computers 60 years ago, could measure distance to the moon.

Furthermore, I have so many questions of things that do not make sense.

Consider this: When diving, one cannot push against the air to change direction. All movement in the air, in flight, basically, is propelled by the force against the board, the diver initiates.

If movement in space cannot be changed by pushing against air. How can it be changed pushing against less than air?

But wait. Air travel is a push against air, so it can be done. But wait. There is no air, we are told by those who theorize, in space.

Who has probed space and reported on the contents? Nobody?

Who has probed the oceans, lakes, rivers and reported on content? It is done, why never done in space?

All theories, again?

Reports and scientific evidence exists, however, for time travel, but not what so-called science and media report.

Reports and scientific evidence exists for weightlessness, but not what so-called science and media report.

Reports and scientific evidence exists for a flat earth, but not what so-called science and media report.

Reports and scientific evidence exists for free energy, but not what so-called science and media report.

Reports and scientific evidence exists for combustion engines operated by water, but not what so-called science and media report.

Reports and scientific evidence exists for combustion engines traveling 80 and more miles per gallon, but not what so-called science and media report. I drove one such car in the 1980s.

Reports and scientific explanations exist for aliens, alien aircraft, but not what so-called science and media report.

Reports and scientific evidence exists for everything in contradiction to assumed theories accepted “realities”, but not what so-called science and media report.

None of this is accomplished except by questioning the so-called reality around you.

I started this with no real direction except to question theory itself. But the biggest theory on my mind as of late, that applies to almost every person in the western world is, do covid-19 vaccines work?

My questions follow:

How is injecting mercury into one’s blood, good for that person?

How is injecting aluminum into an organism good for that organism?

How is injecting formaldehyde?

How does acid in vaccines not breakdown DNA of the bacteria?

How is graphene in covid-19 vaccines good for the body?

Please, take note that I did not question the necessity of stabilizing the vaccine solution. I care not for what purposes poisons are included in vaccines. So what if formaldehyde is used for stabilizing the solution? I am not concerned for the welfare safety and health of the solution. Have you thought about that?

I, we, you, anyone and everyone, could ask questions about everything. One could simply ask why is gravity, for example, still only a theory? Innumerable questions following that could come to the minds of innumerable numbers of people.

So, I ask you why you believe what you believe? I ask you of your beliefs are science or dogma?

I ask you, why have you not questioned what you think you know?