This “technology” claim that the sun is visible, is as luciferian and completely evil, as anything nasa fabricates.
Find yourself the best camera and see how far it “sees” accurately. Get a telescope and see how far on land it “sees”. And you believe your telescope “sees” planets millions and billions of miles away? How is the light from a planet of such vast distance not completely dissipated?
It is unbelievably arrogant and science-retarded to think light is not dissipated over such vast distances. Even at 93 thousand miles, light is totally dissipated. 930 miles, 93 miles.
They claim they are looking at stars and other heavenly bodies that are millions and billions of miles away. How do they know? How, without a single calculation do they “know” the objects they see are not 200 miles away? They don’t.
Don’t ask why. Evil lies, must lie, and must flip-flop everything, for control.
Their lies are based on their fundamental lies.
Find the world’s most effective telescope, and goofle how far it sees effectively? 93 million miles? Impossible!
The Hubble telescope does not boast it can see the moon, much less the sun. If the Hubble cannot get actual photographs of the moon, it does not see it, and we know it does not see the moon because there exists no photos, only images, composites, drawings and CGI animations and depictions. They just said that.
Go and look for yourselves. when they can only animate and depict, it is an admission that they have no videos or photos of the moon.
Find the specifications of the Hubble telescope and report here.
Can any of the “space” theory goons show us the equation and numbers, with angle for triangulation, that determines the distance any telescope can clearly “see”?
Imagine a telescope can see 1,000 miles. How far is it theorized that “space” begins? Estimates are 300 to 330 miles high is where “space” begins.
Why do telescopes not film “space” walks, satellites, “space” craft?
Film, not CGI; not mystery locations in space where a camera floats and takes photos; film does not exist because the tasks are impossible, and nasa admits it with fake everything.
Why are there no actual videos of a rocket lifting off, and being traced into “space”?
How far away is 93 million miles compared to 300 miles? If that is the best telescope technology can do, and I speculate, having seen no claims of visual contact from any telescope, then it is impossible given current technology, that anything can “see” the surface of the sun.
To see the surface of the sun clearly, one would need to build a telescope that has 93,000 times the resolution of the strongest telescope, based on visual acuity of 1,000 miles. Can these telescopes see across the planet 1,000 miles? Is it not curious that a telescope with apparent accuracy to see 93 million miles does not use that acuity to look across the horizon or into “space” to film satellites and rockets?
You see they, nasa et al, have you convinced that the planets they see in the heavens are millions and billions of miles, or light years away. How does the light from a star billions of light years away not dissipate?
But wait, estimates of moon and sun distances are based on prior estimates, based on nothing, based on gross inadequacies to guess if something is 200 or 200 million miles away. It is all lies. Nobody knows. Nobody has done a calculation. Nobody has a number to inject into an equation.
Telescopes claim they can look into the heavens and see planets at certain theorized distances. There was never a beginning point as to how far these heavenly bodies are so no comparisons can be made with references points that do not exist.
So, “scientists” might estimate the distance of the sun using completely erroneous estimates based on theorized distances of stars or moon. The stars might be only hundreds of miles away, reflections of things in the firmament.
Yes, it is possible there is a firmament, and no such fantasy as “space”. NASA has not filmed or photographed “space”.
If I am in my house, and wonder how cold it is outside, I look out the window and make observations. If I execute a pre-test and see water, and check an hour later to see the same water is freezing, I can theorize the temperature is below freezing. That is a start, observation. There is no starting observable point to nasa fabrications, lies and quackery.
There is no start to “space”; no pre-test; no science.
If I look up and see a star, I wonder what it is and how far away it is. If I have no means to measure the distance of that star, any guess, made popular by repetition, is an imagined guess at best. From that guess used as a benchmark for other distances, the 100% margin of error is multiplied.
I can estimate the sun must surely be closer than the stars, because it is bigger, or appears to be bigger, and that is all. I can theorize and nothing more. That is all NASA has, theory based on theory based on anti-science, anti-trigonometry, imagination. Show us one measurement NASA has ever made to back their guesses.
Theory based on theory based on imagination and fabrication could provide a margin of error of thousands or millions percent. No distance of any heavenly body has ever been calculated.
In reality, there is no proof that the strongest telescope “sees” farther than 300 to 330 miles, so the required magnification of the best current visual is actually 310,000 times more than we have.
I do not believe, in the least that nasa can see 1,000 miles much less 9,300 times that distance. You can believe that if you decide to believe the objects you see in the sky are the distances NASA and globe-theory imagine and perpetually repeat.
The sun must be 93 million miles away because we know the moon is 238,000 miles away, but the moon might only be 100 miles away. Nobody knows because nobody can produce an equation to measure that distance, and nobody has a single shred of data.
For all “science” knows the moon might be farther away, and bigger.
Go ahead, believe their claims and distances. Worst, believe liars are not lying to you that they know these things when they have absolutely nothing but planned deception to make you think something is known: that they are smarter than you.
Can you find information that shows how nasa technology does it? Can you find an actual photo of the moon that is not an image, a composite, a representation, drawing, CGI for animated depiction? How do you expect then, to find an actual photo of the surface of the sun? Again, can you explain, show, or prove the distance in any equation” Or, can you provide a reference to an equation measurement, or reference point in space or on earth from which extrapolations of distances can be calculated?
That image, a piece of a “footage” is a fabrication, a lie. Even nasa states it is an image and not a photo.