The dem/libs duped them all.
The “amazingly intelligent” radio talk show hosts, Rush, Savage, and Levin, were all misled from real crimes, committed by the democrats and liberals, to innumerable distractions.
The dem/libs never intended for Mexican and muslim invaders to vote because they don’t. One would be hard pressed to find a news clip of a Mexican, an illegal invader, voting.
I personally know many Mexicans: not one has ever voted.
The propagation of misinformation was, and still is, the key tactic employed by dem/libs who know Sun Tzu’s, and others’, tactics of war.
Make no mistake: the democrats and liberals are at war with We, the People. They are using, and have used successfully, Sun Tzu’s principles.
The first principle we see is that the democrats and liberals have attacked the plans themselves.
Kavanaugh was a plan in the making. The idea of attacking a plan is the easiest assault. It is preemptive in many ways. Attacking a plan, plants doubt.
Sun Tzu’s words: “Warfare is deception.”
Deception is warfare. He or she who deceives, wages war.
The best way to defeat an enemy is to help the enemy defeat himself. Attacking a plan plants doubt the enemy entertains at first, then expands.
The purpose of the so-called Honduran invasion and heavy, heavy news coverage, is to distract. It is one of a long list of many distractions. Distractions must be continual and of numerous varieties to capture and hold attention. Sun Tzu’s words: “Therefore if able, appear unable. If active, appear inactive. If far, appear near. If near, appear far.”
The Honduran situation, the invading army, appears “far” because it was created far to hide the near, active, hidden danger.
The fraud; the deception, is that the invaders elect democrats.
Democrats have not won elections in decades. Indeed, the swamp creatures, the politicians of the unrepresentative branches of government, have propagated so many presumptions, most could not believe or even entertain the oppressive, overwhelming lies and deceptions.
Totalitarian rule must be built upon totalitarian deception. Are we not amazed at the total ignorance of the apparent masses of democrat voters?
We saw a glimpse of scarce democrat support during the 2016 presidential campaign.
A simple reality is that Candidate Trump, at the time, was amassing 20 to 30 times the number of supporters, voters, and electors.
How many Mexican invaders could we count at Clinton “rallies”? Why no democrat-biased media campaigns of Mexicans and Muslims voting? Could it be they did not vote, that the claims of democrats obtaining illegal invader votes were active while the actual voting was inactive? Inactive, or ineffectual, reality, as opposed to dem/lib claims, there was and is an active something, hidden and unknown, until now.
Surely the media did provide scant examples of Mexican support and other dem/lib claims: always organized for but never connected with Clinton rallies. That, alone, makes one wonder if the invader rallies carried credibility for media claims.
We, the public, were witnesses to innumerable claims by the media, and we were slowly brought along to believe the reports. It happened because the masses cannot believe that someone could lie all the time. It is the dichotomy one side has fabricated.
However, we witnessed, time and time again, and still witness it at Trump rallies: scores of thousands of people in support of something, but NOT Trump. Trump is and always has been the representation of something.
Stop, please, and think about that.
If we are led to believe that the tens of thousands represent a mere 50 percent of the voting population, we may be fooled already. It is a given, a full admission by the mechanisms of the opposing party, that roughly half of America votes republican. If hundreds of rallies rallying thousands of supporters represents approximately 50 percent, then three rallies of barely over 1,000 cannot possibly represent the other fifty percent of the voting citizenry.
The formula is the same formula in use by those who claim the democrat “side” is determined by the same variables even though the formula does not produce equally consistent results.
Wikipedia reports Candidate Trump delivered 187 rallies while there is no list for Hillary or Bernie. Combined the democrat variable for the same formula approaches zero, really if the tallying people and mechanisms cared not to tout a terrible loss compared to the Trump masses.
The average attendance at Trump rallies was 6,460, top estimates being 29,000 and 25,000 while Hillary was lucky she had over 1,000 attendees at a maximum of three rallies.
There is no formula for that failure to draw crowds, especially when Clinton could not produce a variable for the formula dem/libs themselves use.
It was the dem/lib media overwhelmingly announcing that Trump supporters represented approximately 50 percent voting support, while the dem/lib media fell silent on the obtuse impossibility that near non-existent numbers at a fraction of the number of rallies somehow, magically produced approximately 50 percent voter support for the democrats.
Democrats claim Trump supporters put him in office, “…speaking to his base…”, as the media proclaims, while claiming non-existent democrat voters almost put Clinton in office.
If “…speaking to the base of supporters…” translates to approximately 50 percent for Trump, then “speaking to the democrat base also represents a percentage of voters supporting democrats.
The ratio, according to the numbers, is about 30 to one in favor of Trump. Is it possible the Clinton campaign really, only “spoke to a little over three percent of the voting population? Quite possible given the overwhelming Art of War Tactics the democrats and liberals needed to employ.
If large numbers at rallies, according to dem/lib media “reports” put Trump in office, then that should translate to an equally identifiable factor in determining the so-called and approximate 50 percent that voted for Clinton, and other democrat politicians. Where is the evidence of anything close to 50 percent support for democrats? It cannot be found nor fabricated. The dem/lib media did not try to fabricate that discrepancy. Empty dem/lib algebra and claims were inactive while the reality of the shattered formula was active.
The dem/lib media actually cannot lie completely, although they would prefer it. They admitted, and still do, that candidate Trump and President Trump spoke and speaks to his base, at these rallies. Was Clinton speaking to her base? How could such a small, near non-existent base for Clinton translate to almost 50 percent?
We are constantly reminded that the women’s vote went to Clinton and almost always goes to democrat politicians. Where was it then? It was at the bigger rallies, for Trump.
We are constantly told that Mexicans and blacks vote heavily in favor of democrats. We are constantly told democrat politicians represent the minorities. Does low minority turn-out at democrat party rallies magically represent 50 percent or does it represent low voter support for democrats. Surely, irrefutably!
It is assumed dem/libs do tell truth on occasion, and that is completely erroneous.
Sun Tzu’s principle, “If they have advantage, entice them.” Who is enticing with crazy claims and false attacks, in everything they do and say?
We are in the first stage, the political stage, of war, moving into more dangerous stages, right now, even on the very eve of an election.
Sun Tzu’s principle: “The political war must first be won before the military campaign can succeed.”
The dem/libs have employed Sun Tzu’s principle of distraction in this political stage of war: deception.
We must realize that the democrats have the vote-counting mechanisms in their control, in a manner, and that they have had them in their control for decades. We could consider these logistics as part of the deep state. This is the active while the inactive, again, is the apparent acquisition of new voters, who do not vote.
The dem/libs long ago invaded propriety and honesty in the representative process, transforming and disfiguring it to suit their political campaign.
Invaders do many things. One is they invade to take-over land and space. The act of taking is theft. Taking over, to use a phrase the invaders have used for decades, is to take. It is to take that which does not belong to the takers.
Why do democrats propagate this crime against the nation and the people of this nation?
Stop! Who relinquishes control and who does not not. George Washington is the republican star of relinquishing control while the democrats are seeing it, from YOU; from We, the People.
Why does anyone try to gain control of anything, referring to the vote-counting mechanisms? Think about that for a moment.
Consider a baseball team that gets control of the scoring mechanisms. We all know why. We call it many things, one being, ‘having the umps in the pocket of the team’. Anybody, any organization that seeks a subversive, cloaked acquisition of counting mechanisms, seeks to cheat. It is for the primary purpose of taking that which does not legally and fairly belong to the takers. But why do takers, take?
The mental aberration is that the taker knows the taker cannot acquire honestly and legally that which the taker wants.
There is no way around that reality.
While the democrats and dem/lib media have been organizing and presenting crazy, what has happened out of public purview?
Sun Tzu’s principle: “Therefore a wise general will strive to feed off the enemy.”
The republicans, conservative talk show hosts and politicians, have been feeding the enemies’ plans for years by speaking to their crazy and enhancing the subversive dogmas the totalitarians behind the scenes have presented. The fundamentals: Constitutional Republicanism, self-governance, representative permission and accountability, and economic freedom, have been inactive, until now.
If democrat party voters and supporters would honestly look at the crazy, outlandish statements of their own “leaders”, Pelosi who acts like she is suffering dementia, and Maxine Waters who speaks to incite violence, they would see what republic-oriented and conservative citizens see, crazy. Are these two democrats, for example, really crazy, or are they exhibiting distractions to hide something?
Sleight of hand in the political arena (not the representative forum) is a trick the dem/libs use continually.
We have been bombarded with three main frauds. We have accepted three main frauds.
1 dem/libs have a basic misunderstanding of realities but generally tell the truth.
2 dem/libs have convinced the masses, even some in the republican party, that republican and conservative is right wing. It is not. Conservative means to conserve that balanced middle the founding fathers established, on the true scale: left is totalitarianism and right is anarchy.
3 Democrat politicians get roughly half the vote, sometimes a little more to win elections and sometimes less, to their losses.
We, the conservatives, the balanced middle, are occasionally stunned and cannot believe the whacky things the democrats and liberals say and do. They have us chasing their tails. Dem/lib crazy, unprincipled and illogical words and actions give us an overwhelming amount of discussion topics, and it occupies our time, efforts, and attention, by design.
What has happened while guards at the door of public purview and opinion, have been preoccupied with the media marionettes of distraction dancing “far” down the hallways away from the guarded doors of reality?
Comments from the dem/libs are purposeful distractions. There should be no doubt their comments and events have captured our attention.
That is a dangerous state in which a nation should not find itself trapped.
What happens while we watch the building burn? The arsonist stands beside us, watches with delight, and sneaks into the night to collect insurance money the next day.
America is burning to the ground, so it appears.
Sun Tzu’s principle is as old as time. It is a trick so useful and easy, the Three Stooges employed it for their slapstick comedy:
Curly presents his hand at his own waist, then circles his other arm behind his back, up and over his shoulder to hit Moe. As Moe is looking down the other hand comes from above Moe, out of Moe’s field of vision.
“Generally in warfare, if (you or your forces are) equal, be able to fight.” Dem/libs never debate, they never stick to a topic. They do not fight because they are not equal: their plans are not equal, being weaker. They know it and employ correct principles of warfare.
“Generally in warfare, if weaker, be able to avoid them.” Dem/libs have mounted massive campaigns to avoid the principles, attacking plans and isolated individuals.
“Generally in warfare, if fewer, be able to evade them.” Again, massive misinformation campaigns, actually using their enemies’ resources, to evade. How many times have we heard republican politicians and so-called conservatives in media and talk radio argue in favor of democrat party and international liberal dogma, that America is a democracy?
The talk show hosts “get it”. What the talk show hosts mean is they believe the democrats do not understand, and the talk show hosts and hostesses spend valuable time explaining to those who fully understand sleight of hand and deception. Nobody can be as stupid as the democrat politicos pretend to be. It is sleight of hand. It is Sun Tzu’s and Clausewitz’s tactic of distraction and deflection.
Imagine an army wants to invade a country. It plans to cross the border of a neighboring country at a certain point on a certain schedule. But, the army announces plans to invade at a certain point on a certain day so the defending country can mobilize and destroy. That is the most fool-hardy tactic an army, or political party could employ. There is absolutely no deception in that, except if the army’s tactic is inactive, or a ploy.
The best tactic is to win the political/misinformation aspect by feigning an attack; leaking false information for a location and date, and attacking another point three days before the leaked date.
Leaking information, spying, is a tactic of all aspects of the war. We have seen dem/libs employ this for years, to distract.
To apply this great tactic in deflecting attention is to attack a border, with an army that was never intended to reach the border. The defenders mobilize, spend the nation’s treasury, contributing to the loss they create for themselves: numerous principles engaged.
How would we describe the Honduran, mostly military-aged men, army moving to very specific locations?
What is the hidden “active” while the inactive, far, feigned attack captures our attention?
The dem/libs are cheating right now, and have been for weeks, to steal, to take-over, TAKE the election.
The Honduran, inactive, invasion is genius: diabolical.
The dem/libs, like the word :”bolshevik” are a small minority. They have feigned large and looming because they have employed all Sun Tzu’s principles: particularly attacking the weak with bigger forces.
Sun Tzu’s principle, “Generally in warfare, if ten times the enemy’s strength, surround them, has effectively been employed by the dem/libs for decades. To attack a smaller, weaker enemy, simply find one not aligned with others, Kavanaugh, for example. The democrats always unite their forces against individuals, appearing to be more numerous than they really are.
The question nobody is asking is what are the dem/libs doing behind the inactive distractions?
The numbers show the democrats have, at most, half of the claimed public support of the voters (25%). In another I wrote article I estimated Clinton had, at best 27 percent of the popular vote. Later I reduced it to approximately 17 percent.
Hillary, at best managed to entertain three rallies with attendance over a thousand, while Trump consistently filled arenas. An average of 6,460 per event, times 187 events, all over the country, involving different people at each and every rally, accounts for 1,208,020 supporters while Clinton and Sanders together cannot show any rough, meagre estimates.
Where is this massive democrat wave? Is it hidden in the respective nothing?
It is non-existent but we believe it is something because of sleight of hand, distractions.
WE, the People, need to physically invade the vote-counting mechanisms and take the count ourselves.
We need to physically take and do, NOW!
The next phase the dem/libs will employ, already planned and in execution now, is the seizure of Congress by force.
Beware! This series of events, and election, mirrors the bolshevik seizure of the Politburo, and subsequent slaughter of Russians and others for decades.
We care not if the few democrat party voters go crazy and whine. We, the People have a commitment to even they themselves, to assure no take-overs, no coup, no fraud ,and no intended genocide.
In my ten years of fighting dem/libs on craigslist and other public forums, of the thousands of claims I have personally investigated, I have yet to find a truth a dem/lib political agent has told. That represents totalitarian deception and distraction.
Totalitarian force cannot be obtained without totalitarian deception, and that is the warfare democrats, liberals, and the bolshevik media complex behind the scenes (and openly), have been waging against We, the People.
There was no Russian Revolution. It was a bolshevik invasion, the same we are witnessing in America NOW! They changed their identities to progressive.
The bolsheviks had, as a primary goal, the elimination of Russians to the count of 30 million people.
What do you, yes, YOU, think the bolsheviks want to do with Americans who have thwarted totalitarian rule ing America for centuries?
Is 100 million eliminated enough for the blood-thirsty dem/libs? No, the dem/libs account for, in my estimation, at most 20 percent of American population, leaving 80 percent guilty of resistance to totalitarian bolshevik/dem/lib/progressive rule.
This means 80 percent, in bolshevik/democrat/liberal minds, can be ruthlessly and justifiably eliminated. This includes minorities.
Please, read. Read The Constitution and The Bill of Rights, YOUR rights.
Search the roots of antifa. It goes all the way back to the bolshevik invasion and the attempted invasions of all countries, including America during Woodrow Wilson’s (democrat) presidency.
We must do more than vote. We must watch the vote counting, even where not possible.
Make representative, self-governance a reality in spite of deep-state, fifth column, subversive democrat party hegemony. Be there, be everywhere.
Our reticence and fears will be our elimination.
It is critical NOW. It is critical now more than ever before. The progressives/bolsheviks are poised.