I went back to my commentary about Bucha From April 11th, 2022.

I did it with a goal in mind, to count just how many times the “reporters” made mention of events, in this case, atrocities, and how much, or little proof they had of who committed these atrocities. I was looking for patterns.

This is the article/“report” I reviewed:


The first sentence identifies an effect:

“…if there is one place in Ukraine that has come to symbolize the barbarity…”

No sources or cause associated with this claim.

Second sentence, a compound sentence, quite long, “…a conflict prosecuted without limits…”

Again, the claim provides an effect without presumption or cause.

The narrator claims, the town was “liberated” April 1st, 2022. Liberated? It was not liberated. The media has propagated the story that the Russians evacuated, retreated, but here it is 10 days later, no sign of liberation or humanity in the least.

A Ukrainian voice, while the narrator makes this claim, points out a soldier’s body lying in the street. “Soldate”.

The third claim of violence against civilians follows closely with, “this was the first evidence of the crimes perpetrated here, the bodies of civilians left decomposing in the streets where they fell.”

The Ukrainian tour guide clearly calls the bodies soldier, but Dan Rivers narrates horrors against civilians.

How long? Was it 10 days after the so-called retreat, that we are given this “report”?? If the town had been, as the claim goes, liberated, by whom and why were the bodies not buried? How barbaric to not bury bodies!

Why had the bodies not been eaten by rats and other animals? Hungry dogs will eat humans.

Do you see, yet, the problems with this “report”?

So far bodies decomposing, for 10 days, apparent Russian withdrawal, but no proof of troops of any kind and the Ukrainian voice uses the word soldate while the images are very blurry. It might be too early in this dissection, 37 seconds so far, to say someone is lying, but at least I will state somebody is not reporting accurately.

So far, in four sentences, we have three claims of ruthlessness and civilian deaths, and two inconsistencies.

Tell us, please, how anyone can believe any of these fake, unbiased, inaccurate, if nor deceptive, “reports”?

“For more than six weeks the world attention has focused on the horrors in Ukraine”, the narrator continues.

Isn’t it the fake conservative media that postulates constantly that people get the government they deserve?

Why did the Ukrainian people allow antifa, fascists and corrupt government to take root in their country?

It is unfortunate that Ukraine was further corrupted by the obama/biden/clinton administration. Hunter biden’s laptop is proof, now admitted by dementocrat/liberal media.

Putin tried to warn the world of the corruption eking into Ukraine, and taken there by the U.S. government, not our representative republican government.

If you are dementocrat, or a supporter of the dementocrat party, and the word republican is poison to you, keep the two separate. There is a republican party and it originally conserved republic principles. America was founded as a republic. Just set aside your angst for a moment and ask yourself if a constitutional republic has rights for all individuals, including you, yourself. Isn’t that the point!

Antifa, the fascist Azov battalion, and the fascist/commie obama/biden administration invaded Ukraine to exploit an emerging Ukrainian economy and country, and destroy it for the luciferian, un-representative, international bolshevik/banker tyranny, along with all other European countries it can drag into the upcoming melee.

Again, go, read the founding documents that say….”Republic of…”.

If you must, relegate it all to evil republic but continue to try to open your mind to reality.

These reports are nothing real, lots of presumption and obvious disconnect of cause-and-effect.

Again, three claims of barbarity and horror, but nothing to connect anything to Russia, Russians, or Putin. NOTHING!

If there is something, please point it out.

Would you, yourself, like to be presumed guilty by this same media that mentions crimes committed over and over, and then reveals you committed them?

The narrator continues with, “We’ve investigated three separate atrocities to get a sense of the widespread, indiscriminate murder being carried out by the Russian army.”

Three claims, no connection, no evidence of who or whom, no evidence of bodies being civilians, or even bodies. Many stills and captured photos show locations that could be outside of Ukraine. One I pointed out recently shows a sign in a Ukrainian town, “Pro Decor”, clearly latinate language, not Cyrillic.

The narrator and the whole mess of bolshevik “reporters” and outlets instills and then reinforces, with numerous instances of brutality. The whole documentary is one unproved event after another creating an emotional connection to completely disconnected and unsubstantiated culprits.

My bet is that you, nobody will find hard or soft evidence Russians did any of these so-called atrocities.

Would you like that deadly presumption of guilt you throw on others, thrown on you?

How would you like it if someone killed people in your town, after everyone but a few had escaped, and you were blamed? This is where the bolshevik bastards are leading all of you sheep.

Once you accept that government/media can witness for itself, criminalize and then condemn, you have given government/media power over you, and you had better never ever make a mistake of criticizing that illicit, treasonous U.S. Government, not to be confused with our dying, murdered, nearly expired Constitutional representative Republic of the United States of America.

The resultant power that deception, lies and presumption of guilt provide, is the power over life and death. It is what the rulers want and steal by tricking you against yourself.

The goal is not control. The goal is to eliminate the masses. The goal is to have power, like god, to choose who lives and dies.

Are you a you cannot see discrepancies in all these fake NEWS, biased, disconnected “reports”?

Are you concerned?



In a country with a population of approximately 47 million people, 5,000 cases of anything is nothing.

Chances of contracting, or being one of those 5,000, is a 1 in 9,400 chance, or .0.000106 percent.

One hundred days of this rate of growth, which is not going to happen, puts a Spaniard at risk of contracting the virus at 1 in 940, over 100 days, 1.06 percent. This does not represent rapid infection which is one condition of an epidemic, and it absolutely does not represent an epidemic in terms of total numbers infected, or most significant, death irrefutably attributed to the blight. 

Most important it does not represent the high mortality rate also needed to be qualified as epidemic. Under this “reported” worst case scenario, the chance of dying from “covid” is about 1 in 10,000. This means if you were to take a town of 10,000 people in Spain you would find, in 100 days, one death. And, true to all “cases”, at least half are reported Covid even though deaths are not confirmed, only assumed. Consider my report of the first Covid case in Utah where a whole bevy of officials contributed to the fraud.

If Spain is the worst there is no epidemic anywhere, including less affected countries, hence there is no pandemic.

The Moors in Hispania, (latin) were settled by Arabs. This explains the dark skin of hispanics.

How dare these nitwit liberals challenge my knowledge of history. To state that Mexicans and hispanics do not have arabic blood and then provide nothing to back their theories, once again, reveals liberal child-id imbeciles hoping nobody exposes their fraud.
The Moors in Hispania, (latin) were settled by Arabs. This explains the dark skin of hispanics. In fact the history of the influence of Arabic (Semitic) blood has a global influence. The Spanish Armada defeat at the hands of the British fleet, that launched the British fleet to worldwide naval supremacy for hundreds of years sent many Spanish ships to the bottom of the English Channel, but numerous ships landed in Ireland. The weather played a large part in this. This explains dark Irish, as they are called. We are familiar with the Irish being of celtic blood: fair skinned, red or blond hair, but there was an influx of Arabic blood that produced blue-eyed, dark Irish peoples.
In fact history records significant events in Spain’s descent and cultural changes. El Cid, of Spanish nobility fame, is credited with purging much of Spain of the barbaric and murderous, imperialistic Arabs in Spain, defending the north returning Spain to its original culture. Southern Spain was Moor.
Why did Spain not retain its muslim heritage, if it ever had one? The truth is that there was a significant muslim population in the south of Spain, ruled by Arabic princes. These southern Arabic princess decided to expand north and they were not only met with fierce resistance, many were destroyed and/or sent from Spain. El Cid was born of this resistance.
The word semite is derived from Sumer, Shumer, Shemite, or the Shemite region of Iraq, and includes many peoples all of similar origins, from which Israelites emerged. Arabs and Jews are Semites with common ancestry. Hebrew comes from the word apiru, or habiru, meaning disenfranchised. The Phoenicians were sea traders but there were Phoenicians that settled inland. During the drought years recorded in the bible, when The Israelites left the land of Canaan to survive in Egypt, the Israelites, part of the inland habiru culture, but not the inland Phoencian economy, sought to survive and as a separate people they left Sumer, and settled in a relatively unoccupied part of Egypt. The Hebrews did not have the resources of the sea-farers but were still of the same blood lines. The economically dispossessed Phoenicians were still Phoenicians: and Habiru or Hebrew. Theories abound, but there are other records of Apiru/Habiru settling in Egypt, not being slaves.
Who was (were) the Sumerian god(s)? Were the Sumerian gods the god(s) of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, as the bible records? No. They were not the same. Were the Israelites the only group to adopt the god of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob? Perhaps they were the main influence in Egypt, taking their God with them, but they never had the numbers when compared to the Arab nations. Habiru/Sumerian/Phoenician/ Canaanites were in existence long before the Hebrews or Israelites and even longer before the muslims.
How did Islam conquer so many Arabic/Sumerian/Phoenician nations? Hebrews and Arabs, Canaanites, for example were not just cousins, and related, but they were brothers of the same ancestry. When did the Arabs become muslim, and why and how?