PART 4: “NASA OBSERVATORY RECORDS UNUSUAL ACTIVITY ON THE SUN.”

Lucifer-sam writes, “Space is very big and, often, very weird.” Dufus, liar supreme sam continues, “Last week, an image captured by…”

What is an image?

An image? Captured? How does one capture an imagined non-sequitur?

Even nasa admits, every day, they have no actual photos or reality.

Please, take note that the words image and imagine have the same latin root word and mean, “less than real: circa 1200”, ”a piece of statuary; artificial representation that looks like a person or thing,” Also defined as, “reflection in a mirror” , early 14th century.

So a nasa image is either a reflection, an artificial representation, or less than real, but not real.

So nasa’s theories regarding distances are not real. The distance of one is dependent upon the unreal, artificial distances of others. All are dependent upon unreal, imagined, and superficial distances that not only cannot be substantiated, but cannot substantiate anything claimed to be in association. NOTHING is real.

Imagine means visualizing the unreal, “to create something in one’s mind.”

Not a shred of reality to NASA imagination, but who creates these nothings? Who portrays and depicts and represents these artificial creations? People, or “people” do this.

These image creators and liars are evil people, so devious and degenerate, they cannot be considered people or human.

One can see video, actual film, of rocket lift-offs, burning fuel and fire and brimstone; rockets lifting into the sky, perhaps 10 miles or 20 miles, but the connections of these obvious realities to “space”, is absolutely non-existent, and beyond the unknown distance of the cover of the atmosphere to where “space” begins, nothing is real.

I speculate regarding distances and heights. I am free to speculate because nobody, including nasa has a single measurement for substantiating anything.

Please find something! Find an equation or measurement nasa has measured, applied and used to calculate anything.

There is no film in existence of a rocket lifting into the atmosphere beyond what nasa actually allows to be filmed, and more nothing at heights greater than nasa’s allowances.

This is all luciferian black magic, sleight of hand. The rocket disappears from view and most people assume it goes into “space” because people are told that is what happens.

What is the height a rocket reaches before it is gone from view?

If nasa wanted to convince we the people that a rocket travels to “space”, why not use computer technology to direct a telescope to follow it, and get actual film footage? Because it does not happen as the luciferian liars claim.

Imagine you are beside the track, watching a bobsled pass. For how much time of that whole run of two minutes, do you actually see the bobsled go by?

When rockets are launched, for how long do you see any piece of video, as the rocket passes? Did you notice the “rocket” does not leave the visual? How can that be when it zooms past at miles per second? It is imagery, drawn, fabricated to give classically conditioned minds something to believe: fabrications of faith in nasa’s religion.

Unless you are in a craft, or a video camera is in a craft traveling with or following the rocket image, as shown in the video, a camera attached to a point high in the atmosphere, would see the rocket cross its view for a fraction of a second, not what the video shows. Again, what object traveling with the rocket filmed the video “image” of the rocket burning to “space”?

From :13 to :16, of the animation the rocket stays in view without change. Impossible:

https://www.yahoo.com/news/this-week-in-space-sun-exoplanet-kuiper-belt-154354360.html

Something such as a video camera or CGI animation, follows the so-called rocket into the atmosphere. As film, this video depiction is impossible, as the article states, depiction. Video depiction, as shown, is impossible unless two rockets are launched together, one to film the other.

At highest velocity, the luciferians claim, the rocket escapes the atmosphere traveling 14 miles per second, or 25,200 mph. Doing the math of space theory or atmosphere height theory, where would a video camera need to be to watch a rocket pass it while remaining in view for 4 seconds, without change in size or position? The video is totally bogus, fabricated, imagined and drawn with CGI. That is the only explanation.

Even at an average velocity of only 1/10th the escape velocity of 25,200 mph, the rocket should escape the atmosphere in a matter of seconds, clearly out of range of any constant view for more than a fraction of a second. I am sure one can calculate the velocity derived from so-called force, if one has the thrust measurements of so-called rocket engines.

I am not about to go this deep into the equation, formulae and theorized distance from earth to “space”. You find the equations and measurements nasa claims exist, and report back here. I contend that nothing of the sort exists.

How long does it take for the rocket to reach max velocity, is one question of the whole theory, never shown in full. NEVER!

Even at 1/10th escape velocity of 25,200 mph, it is impossible a rocket could travel without breaking up. You could not even imagine anything traveling at 2,520 mph. The Concorde hit speeds of 1250 mph.

Rockets, we are led to believe, hit maximum speed of 25,200 mph? The acceleration in a 300 to 330 mile window of the atmosphere, would create a g-force that would crush rocks strapped into seats. It is 105 miles per second, according to theory. According to theory, how fast does the world rotate?

Do not forget that the rocket travels at an estimated velocity, not a measured velocity. Nobody, nothing can measure that high speed.

All anybody ever really need do to dissect and thrash stupid nasa, “space” and “globe” theories is to think and ask questions. How do you know that? Can you show me the calculation?

Based on what is that theory or presumption? How does nasa know the escape velocity of any rocket they claim launches into “space”? How then, does nasa know what is needed to escape the atmosphere, and what is the true distance of the height of the atmosphere?

Nothing is known: not a single thing yet magically nasa produces images, depictions and other fake film and photos of disconnected “space”, “space” travel, and moon and sun theorizing.

IMPOSSIBLE NASA/YAHOO”NEWS”, FEBRUARY 11, 2023, “NASA OBSERVATORY RECORDS UNUSUAL ACTIVITY ON THE SUN.”

The sub script to the headline reads, “Other space highlights from the week”

Upon opening the following is the article:

https://www.yahoo.com/news/this-week-in-space-sun-exoplanet-kuiper-belt-154354360.html

It is almost comical that fake, NASA science can see 93 million miles.

93,000 miles is impossible, and much less 1,000 times as much, 93,000,000 miles.

You must understand that just because we can see sunlight coming to us from theorized distance, does not mean we can see the distance of 93 million miles? It is theory that the sun is 93 million miles away. You must surely recognize the distance is not proved, formulated, or equated. No?

Can you find one measurement by NASA or globe theory that injects one number into an equation that measures, by triangulation, for example, the distance of the sun from the earth?

How do you measure distance? You walk it, drive it, or use triangulation to measure known variables and then use constants to calculate.

How else could someone determine the distance except by one or another equation or formula? It is impossible to look straight at an object even 93 yards away, and determine distance, and even more bizarre to think someone or something can look straight on and determine a distance over i.760 billion times greater.

When the guesstimate was made, did a survey transit with the capacity to measure a distance of 93 million miles exist? How about 93 miles, 9.3 miles?

Does such a survey instrument exist today?

How, anywhere in any realm of science, can a single eye, uni-vision of a telescope look straight on and determine the distance of any object? Do telescopes measure height of shadows cast by one planet on another?

The scenarios for guess and speculating are ludicrous, and anyone who thinks someone is telling any bit of truth when they speculate these ridiculous theories, is living in near-absolute ignorance.

Suppose you can see from one town to the next, can you look down the road and determine the distance? Can you do it better with a telescope or binoculars? No, it is worse with a telescope.

Can you look at your odometer and see the numbers click as you drive? How did the auto manufacturers derive a correct measure and place it in mechanism of an odometer?

It starts with a smaller measurement, the length of a foot and yard.

We know a certain number of feet and/or yards makes a mile. We could walk that distance with a wheel on a stick with a counter and use geometry with the measure of the circumference to determine distance.

We could look at a tower from one town to another, measure with a protractor the angle of ascent, and inject the known height of the tower to calculate the distance. It is all built upon measurements, equations and calculations.

For distance to the sun, or moon, or clouds, there is no measurement, not one, no equations ever used and nothing exists to be calculated. There is nothing, not a shred of data in existence to determine almost everything nasa and globe-theory pretend-science claims.

Not knowing the angle of ascent or the height of the tower, could anyone look straight at the pinnacle of the tower and know the distance along the level to the base? No! A million guesses might put someone close, but do it now for something hundreds of miles away. Impossible, and absolutely impossible for just the distance of the moon.

Please, globe-theory believers, show us the equation and numbers, used to determine the distance of the sun from earth.

Oh wait, it is based on other distances of planets. From what measurements, equations and calculations are these distances derived? None: all speculation and fabrication as well?

Make it easy, show us the measurements, angle and equation used to measure the distance of the moon from earth, 238,000 miles. Even NASA only shows an animated representation. Do your own goofle search. The search I found claims one can see the distance from earth to moon in an “animated depiction”.

Animated? Depiction? Drawings with numbers drawn, done in CGI? If nasa can only show the distance of the moon in an animated depiction, a cartoon, how on earth can anyone believe nasa can see the surface of the sun, according to theory, 390 times as far?

Again, not a single measurement or shred of data exists.

Now notice the image of this “sun” is quite detailed, according to animation, cartoon, drawing, CGI. It is a depiction, not video. From what is the depiction derived if there is no visual? It is imagined, a lie. From whose mind did this imagination come? I believe the surface of the sun looks like Kamala harris’ cheese face. I imagine it, and now I CGI it. How stupid can NASA get to think their whacko theories and imaginations fool people.

D’oh, they fool some.

If the depiction drives from a photo or video clip, why not publish the photo or video clip? Is the answer obvious to you? There is no reality to the imagined pretense. There is absolutely no reality to any visual of the sun.

Please take note that it is two very different things to see the sun’s rays lighting up the world, but quite another thing to see the surface of the sun. It is one thing to feel warmth coming from some unknown distance, but it is impossible for mankind to develop a camera or instrument of any kind, to see the sun, 93 million, 93,000,000 miles away,

PART 4. BOGUS WEATHER REPORTS. CHARACTERISTICS OF BEING HUMAN: SAVING, GARDENING, PROTECTING YOUR CHILDREN.

Do you realize most people live foolishly?

They live a silly, un-entertained life.

Do you not understand how silly, foolish, sub-intelligent the life most people live, is?

Following is my critique of the foolish “NEWS” article regarding bozo-bezos, Shatner and fake space travel.

I mention the silly fabrications because we, many, are seduced and reduced to foolish and animalistic behaviors, and somehow manage to ignore a plethora of realities that should at least cause every single, thinking person to observe and question. Can’t do that? Why? Have you thought about that?

We have a ruling class in America that is immune to the law it forces upon YOU, the masses.

We are facing genocide, YOU!

Poliwood is garbage, conditioning, training you, like a sub-functional, mentally-challenged person. You are being trained, like an animal. Every now and then the master yanks on your chain, you choke and adjust to the collar and ever shortening chain.

You are facing loss of goods and services, and life, YOURS, but what are you doing about it.

LOOK!

LISTEN to “their” promises:

Rolling black and brown-outs: their predictions and creations.

Gasoline shortages and rationing: their realities now.

Food shortages: see the empty shelves and signs limiting your

“free-market” purchases? Whose market, ours or theirs? He who controls, owns.

Fake climate change. Simply using unrelated words and terms shows deception.

Fake space and “space travel”.

Fake internal enemies that you will be sent to dispel, at your risk.

Inflation, FED manipulated and out of our free market control.

You have been told deprivation and famine are coming, and you support something magical saving you, and you do it with vain, foolish, and silly hope: silly hope of a foolish life.

The deception and difficulty increases every day.

It is easy to control animals, dumb animals, reduced to instinctual urges manipulated by smell, taste and fear.

The sexual perversion of the teaching “profession”, poliwood and grotesque dementocrat bolsheviks, reduces the masses to an animal existence, living by instinct, fear and chasing the ball that the trainers throw.

And you complete the narrative by protesting evil and satanic sexual rituals on your children, by going to their meetings and compromising your lives and sacrificing your children according to their rules. Are you insane?

Get your children out of the satanic teachers’, administrators’ and politicians’ clutches!

Get your little innocent babies away from the luciferian trainers and molesters. Run away. RUN! Are you afraid to look “silly”? RUN away!

Fight those bolshevik bastards for your little ones. Beat the enemies of your children, if you must, to get your children away from the sexual, mental, and physical and away from child labor: your children used to further teachers’ gains.

The neighborhood child molester is on the prowl, what do you do? The neighborhood child-molesting agencies are on the prowl. What do you do, take your children to them?

There is a person on the street corner showing sexual drawings to your children. What do you do? Do you rush out and beat the molester, and then take your children to the same molestation by agencies at the local indoctrination centers?

How can people be so stupid, foolish, compelled to evil and idiotic habits?

This predation is worse than you think because your human capacities have been greatly compromised, and you cannot see reality.

Do you have the human capacity for preparing and saving? Do you know? One indicator is that you have a garden for real food for winter. Do you have a garden? Are you insane, or just reduced to sub-human, animalistic instinctual survival: day to day survival?

Who controls your day to day? Is the food you want, on the shelves today? What do you do about it, go back to the crime scene tomorrow with hope?

Have you ever seen a dog bury a bone? Is that the extent of your saving and preparing for future? Do you have seeds?

Survival mode does not save the children. Survival is self-preserving, and little more. Your survival, day to day, subject to fantasies and imagined hope, living foolishly, will kill your children.

What rational, thinking, planning, homo sapient of foresight and cause-and-effect capacity forgets or fails to produce food in a garden?

Are you insane? Are you sub-human? Are you conditioned to live a foolish life, sacrificing others you love for stupid entertainment and empty, fantasies of hope? Are you insane?

What does “sapien” mean? What does sentient mean? If you do not know; if you do not know the etymology and origins of these words, you do not have these characteristics, living a foolish, sub-human, sub-standard, sub-sentient life. Do you expect human rewards for being sub-human?

Would it be ironic if you understood one of the greatest rewards of being human, putting up for winter and rain, would be to have a constant source of food, while those you trust to manage actually told you there will be shortages, and all you had to do was place a few seeds in a plot of dirt.

Do you expect a maturing life when you have not invested maturely?

Being forced to pay taxes, illegal, unconstitutional taxes, is not investing in your growth. It is investing in their democracy that forces you to relinquish your life, done in nice friendly democratic degrees and stages.

Again, what is the etymology, or the origin and evolution of the word “sapien”?

Why do you, YOU, not know these simple things? Football, basketrball, bowling, video games? Are you insane?

Why do you not know self-reliance, saving, putting up food for winter?

PART 3. BOGUS WEATHER REPORTS. SPACE: THE FINAL FRONTIER. ALL KINDS OF FABRICATIONS AND LIES. ALL SCAMS ARE RELATED.

Think about the garbage you let in your head every day.

Do you watch television? Do you have a favorite sitcom?

What is a sitcom? Situation comedy.

It is a regurgitation of lies from one episode to the next, from series to series, of people trying to get away with something by lying. Somehow pandemic dishonesty is funny, humorous.

The precept for every single sitcom episode is constructed around a lie. Have you not wondered about the consistencies in your lives every day? Are you happy associating daily with dishonesty, dishonest people and deception? Do you look forward to being like those poliwood losers, liars, frauds and extremely stupid “people”?

Someone told a lie, because we are all “just human”; someone tried to deceive a spouse, a family member, or the law, and got caught: and that is funny, day after day, after bloody boring, evil, repetitive episode, and this makes entertainment, humor??

Are you so sub-intellectual you are that easily “entertained”? Sitcoms are not entertainment.

“Modern Family”? Do “they” mean modern collection of dysfunctional idiots that lie and prey on the dumb, you? Do “they” mean morons with semi-intellectual thoughts, living unnatural lives, portrayed as “normal” or “modern”, all fabricated to a predetermined end, every bloody, boring, dishonest episode after episode?

Do you watch dishonest people at work, and find the deceptions funny, smart, intelligent, intellectually stimulating? Do you find it funny and entertaining when someone lies to you, manipulates you, or uses you, like your role models do in your favorite sitcoms?

Another prevalent theme is that men are socially inept, retarded, and challenged, and that it takes a) authority, b) a woman or c) a child to straighten the dumb man’s thinking and actions back to “normal”.

Please do not forget, they are all acting. Do you realize they all follow a premeditated script: a plan to connect effects (the end) to unnatural and disconnected causes?

There is a fabricated end and the means do not waver, although the script writes in a little bit of internal conflict, detraction.

The ending is never “normal”. Can you not see that these scripts are predetermined, for their gain, your loss and pseudo entertainment?

These are stupid people pretending to be smart.

Again, you are entertained by boring, droning, abnormal deception?

The scripts are written to show men are dummies, authority is pure, presumed innocent and smarter, and women are just a step below authority. Search maternal incest. Poliwood elevates everybody above the white male.

Authority is government, according to poliwood.

Which “Star Trek” series did you prefer? Are you insane? It is all fake: situation dramas in a studio, “sitdram” if you will, prefabricated to an end for their gain: repetition, curiosity, and false hope for you.

Who has been in space? Astronauts have been caught lying.

Nobody has been in space! It is all a construct.

Start looking, study the composites, the images and look for an actual photo. They don’t even try to call anything a photo. Even “pictures” of storms and hurricanes are graphics, computer generations and fancy drawings: drama in science. They admit it.

Nobody, not one single person has provided a photo of earth from space.

Think about it.

We, man, can dive to the Marianna Trench in specially built submarines with windows to see and take photos, done under incredible pressure. But for some weird, strange reason nobody can make a window in a so-called space-craft, with all the technology available to us, to take a photo of earth from space.

And how did “they” determine there was such great resistance on “spacecraft” when re-entering the atmosphere, that it caused unbelievable heat? At the speeds “they” claim rockets re-enter, and in such a short sprint to the surface atmosphere, and beginning the descent in very thin air, how can friction from air molecules cause such great heat? How hot do jets get as they fly hundreds and, in some cases, thousands of miles per hour.

Has anyone seen a rocket hit velocity to leave the gravity of the earth? The levels of the atmosphere are:

troposphere: ground level

stratosphere

mesosphere

thermosphere

From the surface to the end of the thermosphere is approximately 400 miles, we are told.

How much resistance caused by particles of air and in the air would we find in the highest layer, where there is very very thin air? What affects the spacecraft’s re-entry?

Where are the formulae?

If there is no resistance in space, because there is no particles to interfere with movement, why do the spacecraft not open parachutes immediately upon hitting the thermosphere, or before?

What slows the rocket’s re-entry before the chutes are deployed? Air? If anything the “rockets” should speed up due to increasing gravity as the “rocket” gets closer to the pull.

How does air stop a rock from falling? How does air stop or slow a bullet falling back to earth, and why does that bullet not melt?

Why has NASA never had aircraft high in the sky taking photos or video of “spacecraft” launching or settling?

There are no photos of anything. There are computer generations, drawings with colors, and models: drawings and computer generated images.

There are composites, graphics, drawings and generated CGI. See for yourselves. Did Bozo-bezos or Shatner take a photo?

Back to the physics. I admit, I am speculating. What have you done?

400 miles to “space”, 300 miles of it in very, very thin air. So thin there is no way it causes even slight heat due to resistance of particulate.

A 100 mile drop to the surface remains. A “spacecraft” traveling at thousands of miles per hour spends only seconds in the 100 miles from the surface of the plane(t) to the troposphere.

Has anyone ever seen a calculation of heat due to friction? Where does one find friction coefficients for the very thin air political scientists theorize exists in upper atmospheric levels? 

Could the outside pressure on a deep sea craft be any greater than the internal pressure that tries to force out a window in space? It is minuscule even without the comparison. Air, in a very tight small space produces very little pressure, no pressure comparatively to the pressure of hundreds of atmospheres in the depths of the oceans.

Oh, but “they” claim glass melts in re-entry. Nope!

There are all kinds of compounds science has produced to prevent melting.

Not a chance any of this gobbledegoop science is measured.

Could we, with superior technology, not design glass to withstand high temperatures to take photos? Of course we can. Yet, none exists because “space, like everything you are fed, is a fallacy and fantasy: phantasy, phantasia and phantasm; not reality, a story; a phantom.

Even the most recent trip into “space”, Bozo-bezos and Captain James T. Kirk, of the ‘real” Starship Enterprise (William Shatner, an actor), went into space for “…a few seconds”.

But wait. No, they did not go into space. The most recent jaunt, with the greatest technological advances, could not go into space and could not take a single photo?

That’s it?

But wait, there is another element to this curiosity. How fast do missiles travel? Why is there no concern for their nose-cones melting, especially considering they travel as fast as “rocketships”, all in the denser parts of the atmosphere?

With all the technology; all the improvements in computers and controls and communications, Shatner and bozo only managed a jaunt into the stratosphere, for a few seconds?

WAIT! Stratosphere, not space? YES! They did not make it to the thermosphere, the highest level of the atmosphere. They did not make it to the mesosphere either, barely left the surface, 30 miles at best.

Space”?

The “NEWS” article in question, many outlets in fact, openly state the craft entered the stratosphere only for a few seconds. No need for worries about heat, really. No mention of it. The stratosphere makes up only about 30 miles of the overall theorized 400 miles atmosphere, basically 8% of the theorized heights of the atmospheric strata.

All the dementocrats know the scams, they volunteered to exploit and violate, YOU.

I go into detail regarding some of the inconsistencies and lies, outright silly fabrications, of just about everything.

I have written and published, in this last incarnation of my site, over 580 articles. If it is all just silly opinion, like this commentary might be, then it is at least organized and professionally presented. I do have some credibility. As Mao stated, “There is a quality to quantity”, and nobody will argue that I have quantity.

GHOSTS THAT SUPPORT DEMENTOCRAT PARTY DEMOCRACY AND CENTRALIZED DEMOCRAT PARTY TAXATION.

Sorry, unedited…

CO2, dangerous, unseen, immeasurable

Osama bin laden, unseen, invisible in the mountains but not in myth

Covid, dangerous, unseen immeasurable

1918 “flu” pandemic, unseen, immeasurable except of military personnel returning from WWI, vaccinated by the the battalions, and dying, also by the battalions

Omicron, dangerous, unseen, immeasurable

Russian collusion by President Trump, dangerous, unseen, no evidence.

Ozone, mythical, spoken of as real, never measured, unseen and dangerous…when low, but low is never measured.

Climate change, unseen, although reported. Measured and altered often. Measured and shows results of cooling.

Russian forces shelling civilians, never shown, those close to front who know, mysteriously die without reporting. Masses of American resources and wealth shifted to Ukraine, unrepresented by we, the people, and debt piling up.

Cancer, HPV, “flu”, “cold”, all require compliance and poison injections: mercury, acid, aluminum, anti-freeze, other harmful chemicals, and centralized government control and taxation.

Tax evaders, dangerous, unseen and immeasurable, except now by presumption of guilt, unconstitutional but legal according to U.S. Constitution, not Constitution of the Republic of The United States of America.

Space, unseen, not a single photo of earth from “space”, theorized and immeasurable.

Air pollution, can be smelled and ignored by illicit, illegal tax-imposers.

Violence in major cities, experienced and witnessed, ignored by tax-imposers.

Antifa and BLM, illegal, violent, seen, felt, smelled, experienced, and promoted by illegally instituted federal taxation hit squads.

Federal taxation, seen, felt, dangerous, illegal.

American, U.S. Government military, illegal, immoral, dangerous to citizenry but unseen controls.

The FED, illegal, dangerous, effects unseen hidden by corruption and media.

CRITICAL RACE THEORY: ONE THEORY COMPARED WITH OTHER THEORIES, AND GIVEN A FAIR SHARE OF INSTRUCTION AS OTHER THEORIES.

Bill Maher, moments of cognizance.

Surely he will argue that point. Call it my opinion. I have heard Bill Maher lie and lie.

However, today I write, report, that Bill Maher, a proponent of the left-wing bolshevik rhetoric, not necessarily true, made some keen observations one would not expect from dem/lib movements, particularly, the dumbing down of Americans through a dissembled, subjugated de-education system.

Bill Maher referred to and played a ticktock video clip of questions asked of Americans. “What is the biggest city in the world?”, is one such question.

The answers were, Asia, Europe, Brazil, and others, maybe some actually citing a city.

Maher’s words following are an expose that even the bolshevik-left realizes their dismantling and destruction of real education is a reality.

Maher states: “…so you tell me, if a country is only as strong as its people what can the future possibly hold for a population this moronic, being a full grown adult and thinking a human could walk on the sun? Or that the biggest city in the world as Asia. This country simply has no education standards anymore. They will let you out of a public high school and give you a diploma and you don’t actually have to know anything, which used to be the mission of schools, knowing things.”

Maher was referring to Critical Race Theory, as opposed to actual education of “…knowing things”, and he continued that our children do not know anything.

Controlling ignorant populations is always a construct of left-wing, boshevik/dementocrat tyranny, and Maher has noticed.

I have a number of simple questions, for many issues, that left-wing dementocrat, bolshevik drones constantly refuse to answer, address, or even allow to be discussed.  Hence we see ruling, un-representative governing bodies, such as education boards, having parents removed from the lives of their own children.

Why is a theory taught in schools as if it were the ultimate issue, the only theory and irrefutable truth? Why is Critical Race Theory taught, imposed, lived, and forced upon our children when it is only a theory? What opposing, or related theories should have equal representation and time as CRT?

I have been investigating heliocentric (globe) theory versus flat, plane(t) earth for a number of years now. I have been kicked off Facebook numerous times, suspended, for arguing, fighting, delivering the same tone and vocabulary as those with whom I fight, while they are not suspended.

I have a question that seems to draw the ire of all heliocentric model believers: If the earth is a globe, why do photos show a flat horizon at any shore of a large body of water?

To explain this in geometric terms, if one claims he or she can see a curve looking out to sea, as a ship, for example, moving away from shore, appears to roll over the curve of the earth and “sink” why is this same curve not seen looking across that same view, in fact, where the distance is greater?

If we, mankind, has been into space, why are there no photos of earth from space?

You might well argue that there are. Might I point out that there are CGIs, models, composites, drawings, art and much related but not one single photo.

In fact, the dearth of photos of earth from space is starkly accentuated when we consider the latest jaunt into “space” by bozo-bezos an William Shatner.

Do not forget that Shatner is an actor, and acts unreal situations.

In tha fall of 2021, Bozo-bezos and Shatner took a rocket flight into “space”.

Apparently the whole event lasted 11 minutes, and the report is that the, “The rocket launched from Blue Origin’s private facility in West Texas, reaching above 100 kilometers (or more than 340,000 feet altitude) before returning to Earth safely a few minutes later.”

How did it return? Was it in space? Did it actually go into “space”, and turn around and come back?

How does propulsion push against something that isn’t there, the void of “space”, to change direction so it can return?

That is just the beginning of questions regarding a fake flight into “space”, or a flight into fake space.

Two minutes, with all the new technology of today, is all they could manage?

How many seconds of weightlessness did they experience? Weightlessness can be experienced in a jet at any altitude. We call it falling. The same effect can be felt when an elevator drops.

Why no photos?

With all the new technology, advances in rocketry, and apparent photos of earth in 1969, why could these goons not take one photo of earth from space, even with a fish-eye lens? Did they not actually go into “space”?

These are just questions from my immediate thoughts, drawn from recent internet “discussions”, I wonder about these theories. I am certain I will be adding to this list of queries.

Do not forget that the heliocentric model is a theory and at best a model. With perfect lack of photos of earth from “space”, one must remember that the globe earth is a theory and only a theory,

Do not forget that the plane(t) earth as a flat, straight plane is also a theory but not taught or given a 1% effort as the theory of earth as a globe;

Critical race as a theory is given so much time and instruction it is more than a subject in. School. It has actually been instituted as societal fabric: a part of reality that is only theory.

One should be astounded at how recent and oppressive CRT is; how CRT is so recently instituted and augmented, as compared with other theories.: theories that are so ignored they are not even mentioned.

There are in existence theories in opposition to CRTtheory but CR theory has not been questioned in the least. Not even questioned is the reality that CR theory is only theory and opinion.

How about we teach the Bill of Rights and discourses by Thomas Jefferson, Abraham Lincoln, George Washington, all who opined their theories, that proved to be much more than theory? What theories could these possibly be, you ask. Have you read your history? From where does the Bill of Rights originate? What?

The Bill of Rights, you say, is not a theory that challenges CR theory. How would you know if you have not studied, looked, maybe read one page from the public notices that contributed to the Bill of Rights?

Public notices, you ask? The Federalist Papers is a collection of letters written to colonials at the time of the War of Independence, published throughout the colonies. Public discourse, as opposed to demented CR theory hiding from parents’ purview, was popular in those years: very PUBLIC, theorized and discussed at the founding of America.

Read and see for yourselves if the individual rights, described as coming from god, challenge CR theory.

To be fair to all theories, how about the de-eduction system spend a few moments every day teaching possible challenges to CR theory? How about an equal dispensation of time for each theory be allotted asa balanced curriculum? Who wants an imbalanced curriculum?

Would it be possible to return to a class of basic civics and critical ice theory be given a proper place, a theory with as much given it as other theories? Wait, what a basic civics class?

Do you realize students in America were taught basic civics? What happened, where did civics lessons go? The deranged bolshevik dementocrats eliminated civil, and math, and geometry, and biology, and health.

Did you not know this? When the demented education boards teach that 2 plus 2 can equal five, you must realize math is gone.

Please, take note that I purposely identify and accentuate that this CRT is identified by the authors themselves as theory. Being a theory it deserves much much less attention than things such as, why can people not walk on the sun and what are the big cities of the world?

FAKE GLOBE-EARTH THEORY PROFILE: ROGER BARNETT COMMENT AND MY REPLY, 1/10/22

Barnett: “The earth’s shape is not a theory. it’s been known for millenia and has been quantified to closer and closer tolerances as time and scientific advances progress. FE? Bwahaa…. It’s nonsensical drivel..or dribble for those that foam it out their mouthes.”

Scores and scores of fake profiles all doing nothing but post fake-science, amazingly all in favor of globe-theory earth. Something is surely going on that brings so many ignorant goons together to propagate so many, and all the same, lies.

My Reply:

Known by whom? What tolerances? Barnett has no idea, surely regurgitating spew from his/her/its master handler. Again, Roger, tell us, what tolerances? What is the margin of error? Tell us what scientific progress it is that uses CGI and drawings to make a fake photo of earth, when nobody has ever been “in space”? You lying pos. Known by whom, Aristotle, Heracles, Herodotus, Jason and the Argonauts, Dustin the wind? What a loser! Nobody has known for millennia. What a sewage-sucking fraud! It is that simple.

For all reading this, by many things bolshevik-dick wrote, you can surely see how ignorant and un-scientific everything of dick-roger’s comment is. But, especially and specifically obvious is this: how does one “quantify” something that is not a quantity? 

Known for millennia? Who are you trying to fool? Even the dumbest of dumb, you anti-science, scientific methodology retards cannot be so stupid to totally ignore reality AND history. Are you really so stupid and grotesquely, fat, ugly and lying!

Your stupid pretense (millennia) is not only a stretch of gross magnitude, considering the Bible has been around for millennia, but even you, a real pseudo-person cannot be that stupid to ignore the reality that globe-theory is a theory. Do you realize that when someone says a word they mean it, like theory means theory?

But it is okay. I get where you are coming from and I have a picture of your “profile” and will post it to my site, with my reply, a shit-kicking for you for all to see, and beyond so others can see just how fake and politically motivated, sub-human you filthy bolshevik NASA agents are. You lie like a rat you filthy rotten agent provocateur.

EXISTENTIAL CHINESE SUPERSONIC MISSILE PROVIDES OPPORTUNITY FOR CLARIFICATION OF SCIENTIFIC METHODOLOGY

“China has a missile that was previously thought impossible”

Yes, China has a missile nobody thought could be created, but there is evidence it can exist; that it could have been created. This evidence is observation that other missiles exist and technology applied and working in other areas has a potential to be applied to create supersonic missile technology.

This is the first phase of scientific methodology: observation.

The theory of flying bombs is more than just theory. “Flying” bombs exist. We know it. In science terminology, we call this observation. Predicting, another phase of science, is extending already observed realities using existing technology, not theory. This makes an extension of known observations possible and believable.

This extension is not possible where there is no observation such as  fake disciplines of climate changeling and “space” travel/globe-theory.

Again, theory based on theory is bad theory and can predict absolutely nothing except silly imagination.

This fertilization of imagination-based theory is the core of modeling in “science” today, particularly climate changeling and globe-earth theory and “space” travel/globe-theory.

If all one can produce is unobservable imagination of modeling and fake theory based on unsubstantiated theory, then one has nothing. When theory is based on theory, there is no evidence from which a reality can be extrapolated. This is climate changeling today, and globe-eath/space speculation.

All one need to do, to observe the unobservable climate-changeling and “space travel/globe-theory theories, is to pay attention to the words of those who promote: “models”.

NEWS REPORT TRIVIA, DECEMBER 15 2021: WE WENT TO THE MOON IN SPACE SHIPS WITH LESS TECHNOLOGY THAN VEHICLES HAVE TODAY. NO WAY!

Has anyone gone back and looked at the computers used in the space program of the 1960s? Not only is it archaic but if it is true that those computers were less tchnologilly capable than vehicles today there is no way they could respond fast enough for a trip around th corner to the grocery store.

Have you ever watched th computer geeks at the command posts, as they worked, apparently worked? They do nothing. What are they working on? Were they using Pascal, rotunda or caveman programming?

For gawd’s sake, there is nothing they could do while a so-called space ship was in flight. How slow would those computers have been? An abacus would have been faster.

The speed of computation could not have been ay faster than personal computers of the 1990s and early 2000s, slow.

Two variables to consider: how fast was data gathered while those nerds sat at those boxes, and how fast could a caveman computer translate the data and by what programs was data acquired and interpreted?

You will find no answers because the mute, colluding corrupt media was in in the scam.

Take your first cell phone out of retire, text a few sentences, go to the internet, wait for it, wait for it….oh yeah, forgot, not 5G, or 4G, or 1G. It was bits per second, analog, not wireless or fiber.

It must have been a hell of a long telecommunications cable going from the NASA command center and following that space craft as it left orbit and wrapped around the earth a few times on its way to the :moon”.

How did they communicate with the space craft, radio waves? Too slow. How fast does sound travel in a ir? How fast does sound travel in a vacuum? How fast does radio wave travel in air? How fast in a vacuum? Does it?

I do not know, I am asking.

Has everybody forgotten? It was NASA that created space flight then and it is NASA fabricating global warming today.

Take a look at the scientific paper I have included for your sensory bombardment.

I was in the labs in my university eduction. Every lab experience, every experiment, every investigation at the library into prior studies and experiments, began with an outline, description of the study and/or experiment. Every single study and experiment had a hypothesis, a mode of collection of data, parameters for collating and interpreting data, and a means of connecting the intended data to a predetermined effect of defined and isolated causes. Cause and effect was clearly identified, defined, and organized.

We have never seen a shred from NASA.

Today we are bombarded with effects and solutions taken from absolutely nothing resembling cause, stimulus, data, measurements or predetermined collation methodology.

There was absolutely nothing in the aluminum foil days of the LM of Apollo 11, 12 13. Three trips to the moon with landings, organized and directed by nerdy geeks on computers with less power than your watch today. IMPOSSIBLE!

We are being grotesquely and grossly manipulated, deceived, exploited and discarded.

NASA, IPCC, NOAH, WMO, AAAS, and others are all void of cause, data, measurements, but they all offer up effects without connection to their stated causes. There must be data, pre and post testing, isolation of a variable to test and hypothesized variable. Never do we see a control group of control data. NEVER! How is solution possible without cause? Impossible!

WILLIAM SHATNER IN SPACE? NO, NOT A CHANCE. IT IS A SCAM!

Captain James T. Kirk, William Shatner in space. NO. It is a SCAM!

The “space” trip is a unique roller coaster ride in the stratosphere, not space.

The reports are that Shatner was in space for 10 minutes. Where? Was he in the stratosphere? If, as the “NEWS” reports claim, he experienced weightlessness for a few seconds, then he was not in space. It is the apogee of flight, experienced even in an elevator when it begins to move downward. Such organized, bs, especially from that dimwitted, lying bolshevik bitch, bozo bezos.

What purpose did this fake event serve? Who believes Shatner was in space? All those who believe Shatner was in space also believe many things related. Let us just begin with one thing: that bozo bezos’ craft has the power, force, lift or whatever is needed to escape the atmosphere. Does this bring into question the capabilities and capacities of other craft, including NASA “ships”, and their abilities to leave the planet?

As of yet, over 50 years later we have still not seen a picture of the earth. All representations are drawings.

Did Shatner take pictures, a picture of space, space travel, the earth or the darkness of space itself? No?

We briefly saw a video clip but removed, unavailable on eff bee. Were the pictures of the earth in the back ground drawings too?

Are there no windows in bozo besos’ craft? If we had windows in the first craft to enter space, why not now? Were they real windows? How could they be so big when other aircraft cannot sustain pressures of much smaller windows at lower elevations andhence, lower pressures?

Using computers, 50 plus years ago, that had less memory, speed and capabilities than our phones today, somehow, magically, We, humans, The U.S.A., NASA in particular, managed to produced space craft with windows, and take a picture, but no pictures from bozo bezos. Weird, isn’t it?

If you were to go into space would you not want to show pictures? If you were advertising space travel, at a price, would you not market your product enticing, using visual proof?

This is a major scam. Right now, when we are distracted from the bolshevik biden administration as they seize control of production, transportation, heat, movement and everything to keep We, the People free, and living.

This is the beginning of dementocrat/bolshevik-progressive genocide, and you all walked right into it.

Biden and the bolsheviks not only must be removed, they must be eliminated to save our world. The rulers have, as their prime goal, the elimination of approximately seven billion people: you and yours.

The bastards, the international bolshevik bankers have hung their flags in our institutions, declaring admiralty/corporate/maritime law, over our Constitutional Law, in declaration of wartime rule. Gold borders and gold tassels indicate these verities. It is war against YOU, me, all of us except those the dementocrats identify as subservient and permitted. Your face mask is only one part of your permission to live. You, 95 percent of YOU, WE, the People, do not have all the qualifications for permission to live, and they will be coming for you, more and more as seizure of OUR economies, rights, and freedoms are executed.