Sorry it took so long to finish Part 2. I have business out of the country.

To continue: The “reporter” claims, “We’ve investigated three separate atrocities in Bucha.”

The reporter and “NEWS” outlet did not investigate a damned thing. They assumed, presumed, executed a narrative, and pretended to report fact. Did Rivers trace the path that led to the deaths? Did Rivers follow the tracks out of Bucha to find the culprits? Did Rivers investigates what he presumes? Did Rivers regurgitate the narrative provided or investigate?

Rivers and the corrupt media went where they were sent, looked, filmed and concluded, in ignorance.

Their investigative efforts were so discarded that, in reality, what they did, was little more than make statements of what they claimed is conclusive.

Narrative separates cause-and-effect. When the lies flow so easily the viewer must surely question even the obvious. Are those bodies really people?

You, many, would justifiably say or think that there is no way anyone would go to such lengths to fabricate “NEWS”, by placing dummies in the streets.

How do you know what things people will do to make money? How do you know that nobody would stoop so lowly to manipulate the “NEWS”? Have you heard of crime, theft, fraud, lying, stealing. murder?

But the “NEWS” would never do that, it affects them too. Are you sure? You cannot know for certain anything and yet you presume what they narrate is truth.

Please, do not be naive.

In one part of the video the narrator claims it was apparent that it was the Russians. ITV “NEWS” knows this because they found one Russian shell casing, five bodies in a basement, and V written all over the buildings. WOW! That is undeniable rubbish. It is all limited, scant circumstantial evidence, nothing more. Not a single witness, just “authorities” providing narratives.

One round to kill five men, V written all over buildings to give a clear admission for the bolshevik/banker media that Russians killed these men, and and an interview of the sister of one of the dead. She says, in teary eyes, “..those animals showed up and took his life away.”

What animals? She does not know. She was told who to blame, and she either went along for real, or she is acting. Happens all the time. 

Who did it? 

She is convincing.. 

Where are the other fascist battalions? Are they in Mariupol or roaming the countryside doing what fascists/communists do: kill innocents who support republican principles?

The narrator uses the word “executed” numerous times. Does he know something he is not reporting? What weapons labs, chemical labs, or biological warfare labs are in Bucha. What underground resistance did the five men execute?

If it actually were Russians who killed the five men, surely they used five bullets. If the Russians were so meticulous to take four shell cases with them, why not the fifth? If it were actually Russian military that killed the five men, and they were careful to remove four shell cases from the crime scene, why would they mark V everywhere? Did anyone see the Russians marking “V”? That would make a witness. And who is to say the fascist battalions are not in superior communication, dressed in Russian uniforms with Russia/Ukrainian transports and tanks? One bullet, five men? Ukrainian fascists, trained and aided by corrupt, obama/biden/clinton administration CIA operatives and technology.

What has happened to Russian communications? No “NEWS” regarding blocking Russian technology?

Is it possible Russians pulled out of Bucha long before the corrupt media claim? The dead tell no lies. They also tell no truth.

Why were the men executed? Were they Ukrainian fascists? 

We have a number of possible scenarios here, and the sub-standard reporting, based on a total dearth of real investigation, curious markings and inconsistent evidence, a woman crying after being informed of who did what; all this is fake reporting of nothing. Every aspect should have you wondering what other lies the corrupt media has propagated.

Was the one Russian General, who stated Kiev objectives had been accomplished, an actual Russian general?

If you think this all far-fetched, ask yourself what purpose superior internet and communications technology does?

So many questions, troubles, inconsistencies, outright lies and fabrications, placing false evidence, Almost nothing coming from Putin, who would be pleading with the world and in constant conferences trying to make his case. 

So many things I do not know, but neither do you.

Presumption of guilt will get us all killed. 

To reiterate, one shell casing, too obvious “V”s on tanks and command headquarters buildings: all too fake.

Do Russians not have communications to know where their units are?

They forgot their radios at home? ‘D’oh, guess we have to invade without radios.’

They are close to home, spent months setting up logistics, including communications and somehow, Ukraine military is superior? Ukraine had nothing forward so they could not put up even a tactical retreating defense. A defense position, if you have artillery, is a best case scenario, but Ukrainian military lost as Russia rolled in, as corrupt media tells us, and then had to retaliate, giving up advantage. How stupid to think the outdated Ukrainian military, without CIA and American troops could mount anything, except run-away.

If Ukraine is actually putting up a fight, it is not the Ukrainian military doing it.

One shell case that the “5th column”, fascist media found and placed, and we are to believe they investigated anything and even have a grasp at truth.

Why were the men executed? What did they do?

Is it possible they were actually Russian separatists and were executed by the CIA, Ukrainian fascists,or neo-nazis? Maybe, whoever they were, they were executed by the vicious, bloodthirsty fascist battalions in the Ukrainian military.

Maybe they were pro-Russia Ukrainians who were so sick of the corrupt obama/biden/zelensky corruption and extortion, they preferred reunification with Russia.

This is war, you realize: I am not sure the inconsistent narrator knows. 

You do realize that the word republic has definite importance, throughout the world and through history, yes?

It was the communists who slaughtered Republicans in the Spanish Civil war.

It is republic the world over that is, in varying degrees, representative self-governance and freedom. Republic is what fascists, communists, bolsheviks and dementocrats all hate.

It is republicans the fascists, bolsheviks, communists and dementocrats all kill. In Ukraine, as in every country where there is an understanding and push for republic styled, representative government. Because it happened in Russia, we are now watching one country’s resistance to international, babylonian money-magic tyranny, and we are, as planned, being dragged into the conflict and impending slaughter and genocide.

Do not be naive. Dementocrats are currently killing people in Ukraine and in America. They are killing people in so many different way. They are killing, where they get away with it, anyone with an understanding of, and effort to establish representative self-governance, whether they are called republicans, nationalists or Russians.

The corrupt media makes evil of representative, self-determination, by any name, and they tag decent people, by the hundreds of millions, as counter-democratic. Democracy is just the very thing republic, representative people want destroyed but most do not realize that reality because they have been conditioned to think that democracy is good, or at least acceptable. They forgot it is democracy that has invaded and destroyed countries, not republican self-governance. 

They have forgotten that it is democracy that invades, kills and establishes, unrepresentative, babylonian money-magic tyranny; democracies without individual rights guarantees, all over the world. 

Vaccines have killed tens, if not hundreds of thousands, all un-reported by the corrupt media.

Do you see the pattern here?

If it kills, it is ignored, if it represents self-governance and rights for all, it is portrayed as anti-democracy, and vilified by many descriptions and names. 

For example dementocrats refer to republicans as right-wing, right-wing-extremists, fascists, conservative right-wingers and it is all lie a fraud, a fabrication. Republic is the balanced middle.

Remdesivir, laboratory made snake venom, a dementocrat entrenchment, is killing tens, if not hundreds of thousands (see Stew Peters’ interview of Bryan Ardis in ‘Watch The Water’).

You should be able to wonder about all the claims. Really, truly,

Would it not be an expansion of thought and brain function of a normal human being to question things, maybe just one thing? Try this question: why are these bodies not buried?

You should know it is possible that, maybe this or that “reporter” is exaggerating, or lying. Reporters and “reporters” are, after all just people.

A question you should ask of me is how I know. You should ask what proof I present.

I ask you, what would it take to convince you of just one scenario I have postulated?

Do you apply the same scrutiny to the Rivers/ITV “report”? If you do then you realize Rivers/ITV has proved nothing and the theory is no better, no more provable, and no more credible than any of mine. In fact my theories have logic while ITV tosses it and replaces it with terribly inadequate, circumstantial and planted evidence. 

How can you not wonder about truth, perspective, or simple opinion-based “reporting”? Reporting without connection of cause and effect is opinion only.

The documentary makes absolutely no connection of so-called atrocities with the perpetrators, making this “documentary” nothing more than an opinion piece, an op-ed.

How many American civilians have gone to Ukraine to fight? How did they arrive at the conclusion that Russia was to blame when media has not provided a single shred of evidence or proof that Russia or Russians did anything?

I watched a video, a seemingly sincere report, about a number of paramilitary battalions, not just one. When it serves the corrupt media’s purpose to report only one unique paramilitary unit, the documentary focuses on one and narrates as if it is the only paramilitary battalion. In this case the “NEWS” outlet had to make sure the narrative did not reveal there were many. Their deception is always carefully scripted.

Furthermore, the corrupt liberal media, all medium, must know the truth; the reality, so they can avoid it.

Rivers/ITV has to know truth so they can deceive without letting a truth slip our by mistake. and not let truth escape their clutches. The truth was found in another “documentary”.

You see, the corrupt media reported THE Azov battalion, as if it were the only one, while they knew damned well, there were more.

Why do liars lie? They have to.

In this same documentary a reporter, interviewing Ukrainian Nationalists, seems to interview a real man who is home from the war, on leave, presumably. Why is he home, when the fighting has increased? Is he an actor as well?

The reporter, states, “…interesting dudes, clearly nationalists. They also said f__k the police, f__k the government, burn it down.”

I ask, is that a good attitude? Are they anarchists? Is anarchy good, safe, civil? According to left-wing, liberal, bolshevik/banker media, are nationalism and anarchy not fascistic and therefore?

I am never astounded that to liberals and bolsehvik/dementocrat media the narrative is always more important than truth. I am also never amazed at the hypocrisy, inconsistnies and contradictions. I am sure you are amazed at what I say, but have you really, truly studied their words and cross-referenced anything?

Someone is lying and you only think you know.

In reality fascism is not anarchist. It is cousin to communism, socialism, bolshevism, and all forms of left-wing tyranny including democrat-party democracy.

Do these soldiers sound like representative government types, or do they sound oddly like America’s “anti”-fascists: BLM and antifa?

They are crazed, left-wing radicals, that claim to be involved in the fight, but appear to be at home, avoiding the fight. Do you see this reality?

Do you see the problems here? The mainstream media reports an anomaly, the Ukrainian Nationalist Azov Battalion, fascistic but fascist in a good way, for Ukraine.

That is, again, impossible.

A vampire is a vampire and a scorpion cannot stop from stinging. A fascist is a fascist and, even by the nationalists’ own words, rebellious to government and police. How is fascism good, again?

The media, the “reporter” of this let it slip that there are more than one fascist battalions. Are you curious as to how many? And what is the fascist goal? Are the fascist battalions’ goals commendable? How do you know? Why would you presume something good of fascists after media has vilified fascism? Is fascism good for a country because a corrupt, lying media makes that claim?

If there exist in Ukraine fascist battalions, and Putin is fascist, why are they not allied, or are they?

I would bet that almost the exact opposite of every single claim the corrupt, international, bolshevik/banker media makes is true.