WHY DO SOME HAVE SYMPTOMS OF THE UNIQUE STRAIN OF “FLU”, CALLED “COVID-19, BUT TEST NEGATIVE? WHAT IS MISSING?

Why do some people have symptoms of the unique strain of “flu” called “covid-19”, but test negative. What is missing?

I apologize for not continuing with may critique of governor herbert’s fake “news” report. I have so much information it is overwhelming. I started this commentary for the purpose of dissecting and debunking Herbie’s lies, but collected so much insight and information, and as a result found myself rambling, I had to just stop at a point and separate a new commentary by spacing.

I have a question. How can people be sick without being sick? Testing positive for “covid” is not sickness, and passing on a sickness that does not make others sick is not epidemic or pandemic or sickness, or rational. Tyranny is rational. If you do not see this from the ruler perspective, that is any excuse is used to lockdown, expand and deny more and more while looking like a benefactor. If you do not consider this as a valid assessment, then you are either deadly stupid or cowardly.

How many other diseases and viruses would you test positive for if tested, while not being sick? Thousands. What is missing in this equation?

Is this the beginning of health discrimination? If I am healthy I am denied? I am already denied much because I refuse to wear a mask. Go to hell herbie!

Sick but not sick? How is it that there are many who experience the symptoms unique to “covid” as we are told, but test negative? Again, I wonder what hidden, unexplored variable or variables are the tyrants, herbie and other governors of National Governors Association hiding. How can you be sick or considered sick if you are not sick?

This lockdown is not a concern for the health of Utahns. Greater health crises are resulting from lockdown than the “covid” creates. It is political discrimination against those who do not comply. It is identifying and marking the slaves of NGA oligarchy: those who show compliance and ignorance by wearing the badge of obedience: an ineffectual mask.

Some woman asked me in a store how I could be amongst others and not wear a mask. She was phishing for hate. I will not bother with the story but suffice it so say she had already made up her mind about me. My serious questions, designed to get her to think and question were met with her proclamations of my character based on her immovable presumptions: stupid at her deepest lack of human intelligence.

Are you such a fool as this woman? Can you look at a single bit of information and let it live all on its own in your mind, without classifying it as republican, or redneck, or anti-science, or anti-climate? Can you just allow a thought to expand your mind for a minute, and ask why? Have you descended that far below characteristics of being human?

Again, the questions: how can someone be sick without being sick and why do some people with unique symptoms of “covid” not test positive for “covid”?

Only three things can happen in your thought processes regarding these two questions. One, you ignore the rationality and deny, making yourself your own worst enemy, unable to discern friend from foe and friendly from deadly; two you let the questions remain unsolved and ponder and question them throughout the day trying to actually explain the irrational answers inherent in the questions or remaining open to learning more and; three, you are just so stupid you cannot understand the question, in which case you need to learn to be a human again, a being that can assimilate information, identify it, and use it.

Again, for your benefit: Why do some people have “covid” symptoms, unique to this strain of “flu”, but test negative? How can someone be sick when not sick?

The questions I pose should be considered as a way of assimilating information and using it to either eliminate disease, which is absolutely impossible, or to increase the resistance and immunity of the individual: everyone. Why are politicians not doing this?

A scientist and benefactor of humanity would be insanely persistent in doing these things, but herbie, the departments of health and the National Governors Association are not only avoiding this, they are insanely persistent in lock down, denial, oppression and other tactics and characteristics of ruthless cruel bolshevism.

Hang them all.

It is either them or us.

WE WANT THE SCIENCE, NOT THE SCIENTISTS. WE WANT THE DATA

We want
the science,
not the lying
scientists.
We want to
see the data,

not the interpretation, according to party narratives of fallible, politics-first scientists.

Get out of office and leave us alone. Take your democracy with you and shut up as we restore our representative process for We, the People, not you the party.

We, the people own this country. This country does not revolve around your democrat party, centralized democracy. You lost. Get out!

We don’t want scientists who can be as imperfect, egotistical, biased, fearful for their jobs, easily intimidated or bought by politics-as-usual, like politicians of the deep state establishment. We want representatives not democrats and democracy mongers.

We don’t want scientists who cannot shut their political biases off. We want scientists who give us the data and the science.

Is there a scientist in the liberal media that has looked at anything other than the bolshevik/progressive democrat party narrative?

Do you know what a narrative is?

Is it true that there is a narrative from both “sides”?

No, it is not true but you would find liberal media and democrats, when pressed with accusations they are propagating party-first narratives, will escape to accuse the other “side” of the same. Have you investigated to know the truth? Are you so foolish to ignore your need to live with sure knowledge? How can you be so suicidal?

Imagine you are going outside. You look out the window and see a beautifully clear day, with bright sunshine and gorgeous blue skies.

Have you looked at the thermometer? Have you looked at weather forecasts or current temperatures.

Is it hot or cold? What is the season. Does it matter to you?

The political/representative situation in this country is hot and cold. What season is it? Are you going to step into conditions, by your vote, that may place you in a beautifully stark, freezing day without clothing? Your first mistake ws voluntary ignorance.

Who is propagating a narrative.

If you were to look at three or four sources of news, do they all say the same things, plural?

Did you know that President Trump and Melania went to Ireland in 2018? Do you realize they were treated very well, followed, loved by the Irish, and compared with the time the Kennedys went to Ireland?

Who failed to report this significant NEWS story? Did you hear about it on MSNBC? Did you hear about it on CNN? Did you hear a whisper of it on ABC, CBS, NPR?

Who carried a wrongful, dishonest, deceptive narrative, cruelly criticizing the Trumps and others for many things while the Trumps were a big hit in Ireland?

Is that manipulation of true events your ignorance? Who is telling you the political/representative situation is freezing or too hot?

You had better know who your friends are. Who is George Soros?

Why is the media attacking President Trump for being supported by billionaires? Has the press named one?

Who is Tom Steyer? Who is George Soros? Who is Bill Gates? Who is Mark Zuckerberg? Who is Jeff Zucker, Bezos?

Are these billionaires supporting Trump? Is that the billionaire support the liberal media and democrats claim supports the president with unlimited funding? Is that a hot lie?

So, are you excited to be deceived? Who lies to you, those who love and respect you, or those who steal, cheat and plan to steal from you?

You had better find out today who your friends are.  You had better find out who your enemies are, at war with you over YOUR individual rights.

Good luck. If the democrats take power, they come after you because you are American, because that is what, who, makes America they hate. Being a democrat party supporter, liberal, or a democrat voter makes no difference. You are American and that is a crime, to the hateful dem/lib bolsheviks.

97% OF SCIENTISTS AGREE, THE SCIENCE IS SETTLED (A CRAIGSLIST RESPONSE)

10,883 out of 10,885 is not 97 percent.

Written by scientists or dem/libs?

So there are two scientists of dissenting opinions?

Only two? What are their names?

That is so funny. These morons expect people to believe there are two that don’t believe global warming is a hoax?

I thought the number was 97 percent.

If these buffoons are going to lie, at least get the lies close to accurate.

Out of 10,885 “scientists” (laugh), 97 percent would be 10,558.45m, leaving 27 dissenters. Where did the other 25 go? Did they vanish, with the 10,883, or did they not exist to begin with, like the 10,883 global hoaxers, I mean warmers?

Do I seem afraid to look at this objectively, honestly, rationally?

Really, tell us which lie it is, 97 percent of all democrat party-paid scientists agree, or is it that only two don’t agree?

Ask your doctor if paying him or her for services not rendered is right for you. Ask your doctor if paying for services not rendered is right for him or her. Ask your global hoaxer, I mean warmer if your sacrifice but not his/her/its, is right for the planet.

That’s too funny. Such a boring moronic conflict of interest this site has never seen, and it can only come from a lunatic liberal from la-la-land.

10,883 scientists?

What are their names?

That is funny. Really, who are they? Are they nameless fabrications from the lunatic leaps of the lost in la-la-land liberal mind?

Which mind? Who collected the names?

Who did the survey?

Where is the survey information?

Anyone that sponsors a survey wants the information published. Where is the survey?

Where is the publication?

Where is the list of names?

Morons!

Tell us. Is there a list in Scientific American?

Is there a list of names in Popular Science?

Is there a list of names in who’s making money from the dem/lib trillion dollar stimulus?

Anybody that expends that much effort, to survey that many people, certainly knows their reputation and credibility are questionable until the burden of proving their hypothesis is correct.

At the worst they want their information published or it is nothing.

Where is the raw data?

Who are these “scientists”?

Ok, maybe a different approach would work.

Who are the two that do not agree?

Where can we find them?

You see, dear reader, the liberal rats will not even mention their names because we would see a whole community of consistency, opposing global hoaxing, I mean warming.

You can go to petitionproject.org and see the names of the 31,487 scientists who agree, global hoaxing, I mean warming, is a hoax.

Oh, but wait. If we give the loser-libbies, the math retards, another chance maybe we can find the 10,883 lost global hoaxing, I mean warming, scientists that agree.

Petition project.org lists 31,487 scientists. The total is 31,487.

If we add the 10,883 to that number we have 42,372 scientists who believe global warming/climate change is a hoax. Please, serve yourself with rfact, truth, and reality. Go to the site and pick a nam. You will find a real person, while the 10,883 cannot be found, except for a handful I mention in a different commentary.

Of these 10,883 who “believe” in peter pan….I mean never-never land, I mean global hoaxing, I mean, math, a little over 200 of them, actually exist and can be found on the list of the la-la-land liberal 10,883 consensus of science. How solid, is that consensus if 200 of 10,883 exist? Hmmm, let’s do the math, real science:  about 2%.

The consensus is worth about 2% of reality, truth and integrity. That barely meets the requirements for margin of error, much less margin of correct hypothesis or theory, or science.

Boy, this new math by these liberal super intellects, is tough.

In fact, the percentage is not even close. In fact the percentage that believe is less than 50 percent, making the loser libbies, AGAIN, the VAAAAAAAAST minority.

Woo hoo, that’s close to 97 percent, if we take a 300 percent margin of error.

Margin of error: a little tough for poopy pantser utardidiot to figure out. A normal scientific margin of error is about 2 to 4 percent: unless you are a dem/lib peter pan.

Really, he could fly, if he existed. Hmm, existence, kind of a big, important factor.

The loser libbies, taking a mid range margin of error of 3%, are off by more than 33 times a normal margin of error, 33 times as much as their own margin of actuality.

WOW! That is some kind of nightmarish math.

But, tell us why the global hoaxers, I mean warmers, want our compliance.

Tell us why the global hoaxers, I mean warmers, want We, the People to surrender OUR rights and freedoms, OUR hard earned cash, cars and heated homes?

And to whom do they want these things surrendered, to those who have not given up these monstrous planet-killing toxins?

This dem/lib, progressive/bolshevik hypocrisy is deadly when we consider that 300 million Americans could be out of heat for the winters ahead, while the global hoaxing, I mean warming, pigs live lives of luxury and warmth.

It is potential genocide, by a bunch of math-retarded psychos.

And if their math is so bad in plain sight, how bad is all their math?

Maybe the reality is that we have global cooling. Trends, 30,000 scientists, common sense and reality indicate cooling.

Cartoons, fabrications with cool lines and colors, and lies do not make truth.

Fabricating numbers that do not match does not make truth or fact.

Again, who are these 10,883 scientists? What are their names? I crack me up.

Show us the list. How about utardia just show us a reference to the survey or company that collected the “data”?

Who did the survey, NOAA that cannot get the terminology correct? Morons!

Funny.

If I could draw a cartoon I would draw two white, old, men Hillary and moochelle oafama, riding a donkey backwards, claiming they are the 97 percent that “believe” global hoaxing, I mean warming, is an accurate science. The caption would be, spoken by hillary, of course, “we knowed it is currect, because we knowed it.”

Too funny, and of course, being consistent with dem/lib theology, a cartoon that insults democrats, liberals and global hoaxers, I mean warmers, makes the claim true.

Woo hoo. I win!

Yay.

We can all go home now, and turn up the heat, fire up those muscle cars, and throw our dem/lib neighbors into the streets to freeze in the “warm” winters (but not the deep freeze every year in the north east- it never happens).

If we were to stop the political/global elite from heating their homes and driving cars, the carbon print would drop massively. The is a very big return on investment, and we would beat global hoaxing, I mean warming.

YAY. We all win, and the dem/libs get what they want for others, for themselves: that they try to force upon others, not themselves.

NOT on my watch, you filthy pigs!