IF COVID ACTUALLY EXISTS AND IF COVID IS TRANSMITTED THE WAY THE EXPERTS AND POLITICAL AGENTS CLAIM, THEN HOW DID NUNS SEQUESTERED FROM THE GENERAL POPULATION CONTRACT IT?

This commentary is in response to a comment on Craigslist. I have provided no quotes or references, but this is how I have waged the war on craigslist for 12 years. I respond to the already existing post, writing to the readers and not the author or agent posting the comment. I do not flag to remove posts because I want readers to see just how whacky, dishonest and vague dem/libs are and how near absolutely unsubstantiated dem/lib claims are.

IF COVID ACTUALLY EXISTS AND IF COVID IS TRANSMITTED THE WAY THE EXPERTS AND POLITICAL AGENTS CLAIM, THEN HOW DID NUNS SEQUESTERED FROM THE GENERAL POPULATION CONTRACT IT? WE MUST DEDUCE SEQUESTERED NUNS WERE INFECTED IN WAYS OTHER THAN THE CLAIMED MEANS.

If nuns, locked away, caught COVID, it is not passed how the non-scientific scientists and political health agents claim.

Can anyone say deductive reason, scientific methodology?

Masks, lockdowns serve a different purpose, unknown to We, the People.

The bastard National Governors Association held secret meetings in which they were instructed as to how to work this collusion to seize our country.

It is not for money. Soros and the rich already have more than they can spend. In addition they easily seem to make more.

The democrat/bolshevik politically elite are executing a genocidal plan and everyone is afraid of a bug nobody has identified or tested.

We are also being set up for property seizures with another, non-governmental, unrepresentative, unelected agency with more power than congress. The EPA is advertising a new mysterious killer that does not kill. Radon gas is non-existent.

Just as specialists can enter private passwords to tamper with vote counting; just as the COVID exists without a shred of scientific methodology involved in any part; just as congress has nothing to do with chemtrails spewing lung irritants such as aluminum and barium metals; just as the EPA endorses mercury poison and rat poison (fluoride), without congress making laws; just as the politicians claim they are working with business for a brand new fascist economy and lockdown; just as politicians claim they have the science for COVID that does not exist; just as politicians claim they have the science for global warming/climate change, that does not exist; so too goes the political involvement in democracy, taking representative government from We, the People, and nobody sees it.

How ignorant, as a people we have become.

This is war, they declared and execute it before our eyes, and the masses think the rulers like, respect, and serve us.

Hang them all! Start with the anti-representation, democracy-mongers, the democrats.

Global warming pre and post test measurements and data. Written 6/21/16

Global warming pre and post test measurements and data.
A real scientist would look at NOAA and the la-la-land liberal fabrications and ask, where is the pre-test? Where is the post test? Where is the control group or control data, and where is the test subject or data?
Did NOAA have satellite pictures back in 1880? Did NOAA take water temperatures in the middle of the Pacific ocean in 1880?
Why the pretense of comparatives? Is it an attempt to trick fools and drones into believing there was data to compare with, way back then?
NOAA admitted some time ago the data that scientists collected over a century ago was flawed. It was a theory, and is still just a theory. The standards and measures for lengths and temperatures is still the original standards, so how could the science have been flawed then?
If NOAA, and the fake NASA site claim the data collected 100 years ago is flawed, why did they adjust everything down? If there is a two percent to four percent margin of error (the standard in science) the data can be adjusted either way. Margin of error accounts for adjustments both ways. Real scientists would know that, and proceed with that scientific methodology, regardless of the outcome. Not so with NOAA. Why? Why does NOAA adjust only to their predetermined agenda? It must be a predetermined agenda otherwise NOAA would have employed real scientific methodology and treated data with a margin of error to correct for either deviance. They refused to do what scientists do.
Did NOAA have satellites in the 1880s, or did they send out a crew daily to measure the ocean surface temperatures in the middle of the pacific? That must have been one hell of a chain of row boats.
A chain of row boats, with the original standards and measures would have been much more accurate, being in the moment when the norms and standards were established, rendering the most pretentious scientific, liberal, political assault on science and technology in the future, moot.
The audacity of these moronic-sub-scientists to think they are more qualified to adjust the standards and measures today of those that made them scores and hundreds of years ago, is astounding.
Every time I go to the sites and check the claims (not even theories), of these buffoon dem/libs, I have to laugh.
It is like mickey mouse, a cartoon, writing a science fiction novel, and dem/libs guffawing and harrumphing when someone asks if the writer is a cartoon. “Oh no, he’s real, they claim, he’s a fact, its true that cartoons can come to life.”
How utterly moronic can these stupid dem/libs get?
And then the pigs, the slovenly mutts, flag, remove and criticize my posts. They attack and allow me, and truth itself, no defense. That is just sick. It is sick, psycho, liberal pseudo-science.
What do we expect from neanderthal scientists, measuring the heat of a volcano by jumping in? Actually they measure it by throwing someone else in, or convincing the ignorant masses to jump in for a free phone.
Morons, dem/lib dimwits, science-retards!

RE: “Scientific evidence for warming of the climate system is unequivocal.” Originally written 6/21/16.

RE: “Scientific evidence for warming of the climate system is unequivocal.”
The following is my response to a post on craigslist in Salt Lake City, June 21, 2016.
In this post the “writer” plagiarizes NOAA with the title of the post and numerous claims throughout.
I write:
Show us the evidence.
What is a climate system? Is dimwit dem/lib talking about a “clime”, or maybe a weather front? These are real terms that reveal real science, understanding, and real knowledge, while “.warming of the climate system…” is at best a non-scientific construction of an alien-structured grammatical mess. Who, what, fabricated this poor collection of words and terms?
Do these dem/libs, fabricating goofy terms and words, think others will wet themselves and follow in line behind simpletons that cannot construct a rational thought?
What is a “…climate system”? What is, “Warming of the climate system…”? Climate is warming and cooling. This dem/lib is speaking in circles to confuse others, and dazzle unsuspecting readers with his/her/its sophistry (look it up).
Scientific evidence? How could there be evidence when there is no data? Where are the volumes and pages of lists of university studies by PHD students submitting their theses?
Where are the measurements, data? Evidence is non-existent without data and a measurement or two. Anyone can pick a topic, go to a library, look up in the indexes for studies done by PHD students on almost anything. This is cutting edge stuff. Anyone can go to the library, look up climate topics and find numerous studies showing the temperatures are dropping.
Suppose I make a claim to illustrate my superior knowledge.
“I know a yard is longer than a meter”, I state.
“How do you know?”, you ask. I reply. “I just know.”
You press, “how long is a yard?” I say, “pretty long, the evidence shows it.” You ask, “how long is a meter?”
I reply, “almost as long as a yard.” You think you have me so you ask me, “If you are comparing the two, how can you know one is longer than the other if you cannot actually compare them. How can you know anything about either measurement if you refer to no studies that compare them, and if you cannot define how long either is?” I reply, “I just know it, the evidence is there.”
Anyone, at this point would ask, “what evidence?”
Besides the fact that I would be dead wrong regarding a yard being longer than the meter, one could also note I totally rejected scientific methodology.
A meter is a full yard plus 3.6 more, MORE inches, making a meter longer than a yard. That is a comparison using a common standard of measuring, to compare the two. This qualifies as data applied. Using one or the other as a standard, and then comparing, would be considered data.
You ask me again, to explain the comparison between the two, and how I can make a comparison without actually comparing variables; without common measurements or data to compare. I reply, “scientific evidence for measuring the measure of a longer yard than a meter, is unequivocal.” At this point you realize you are talking to an uneducated, egomaniacal moron, just as we, the educated and honest conservatives try to communicate with dem/libs, living in “I am special in liberal la-la-land.”
Using an inch to measure two “systems”, and then comparing, we see that a meter is longer than a yard, but a dem/lib would argue against that, if it meant he or she could propagate government stealing from all to give to the dem/lib frauds and liars.
Where is the science? This pseudo-science, injected presumptions played as credible facts, from dem/libs, is almost laughable.
Where is the data? Where is the hypothesis, the theory, the study parameters and interpretations of data? Where is the comparative unit of measure? These things are real characteristics of real science, and the dem/libs haven’t even got a clue how far from real science they are. Lying has a way of making one stupid. In essence, as mom and dad taught us, dem/libs are only fooling themselves.
There is absolutely nothing credible from the bogus sites because everything is a fabrication.
Everything from liberals is just like my little brother, in third grade, “this guy I know…”, trying to fabricate credibility from a lie. Then he would ramble on to fabricate false truth and “science” to suit his goal, hoping to convince us to give him our money or whatever he wanted.
Notice too, that NOAA is a .gov entity. Government is part of this? Now there is a source for total dishonesty. Why do dem/libs pick and choose which lies from government they want to believe? Are dem/libs so lost in la-la-looney science land that they think it is okay for government to lie as long as it is only lying to conservatives and smart people? The average democrat is at least 10 IQ points below the average republican. Democrats have the uneducated Mexican/muslim vote to factor in their averages. I rest my case.
The fact is that more republicans graduate than democrats. How many Mexicans, do you know, that graduated from college? Do you know just one? The big fraud the democrats proffer is that Mexicans, invaders and the dregs of mexico, work hard, vote, and are recipients of higher education. Such stupidity, claims connected by nothing except dem/lib lies, is hilarious.
Mexicans in college? How is that possible when the morons cannot even speak English? Who is more ignorant, the Mexican or the dem/libs that persist with bogus claims that are so easily refuted a third grade Mexican him or herself could refute the “lies”?
Remember this and you will know the liberal/progressive/fascist mind: they always want something for no contribution of their own but boast of two things: what they plan to contribute and what they plan to force others to contribute.

SATIRE: AS ARCTIC ICE MELTS DUE TO NORMAL HEAT OF SUMMER…

As Arctic ice melts due to the NORMAL heat of SUMMER….

What a moron, utardia, writer on Craigslist.

Colder summers, colder winters, earlier falls, later springs, adds up to global hoaxing, not global warming.

They call it “climate change” now because if they had to call it “warming” they would have to defend their positions from everybody who knows the trends are cooling. They could call it pollution, what it really is, and that would direct resources to solve the real problems. As it is, the global hoaxers have no concerns for the real problems and real solutions: solutions that are definitely needed. They are more interested in compliance, oppression and control of We, the People, and lining their pockets as ignorant, deflective “expert” liars. They have the midas touch of turning other’s wealth into their own, by stealing through government. 

Global hoaxing is protectionism, the root of all tyrannies.

We are going into an ice age. Let us see if I can whip up the same fear and manipulation using the same tactics as the dem/lib hoaxers. I predict, in keeping with modern trends, that the earth will be in an ice age by  2750 ADHD. We can expect -300 degree temperatures and almost all life on the planet will be eliminated. We can expect to wake up very cold in the mornings, and when we look out the windows, we will not see the missing climate signals, that utardia left for our future use in 2750 ADHD.

When we look at the star placed above the squiggly lines and cool colors on my global hoaxer numbers chart x-axis versus un-measured temperature increases, on the y-axis, we see a really cool depiction of a pyramid. YAY, just what we wanted. It is quite pretty although there is a spot where we will have to change the results of our studies to make that left line a little straighter. Welcome to liberal la-la-land, global hoaxer-ville.

Most global hoaxers are so science-deficient and challenged they forget to leave one or the other axis off their “charts” and”graphs”. It is like not knowing enough to add flour to bake bread, and then claim it is baking. We witness, in every chart, claim, “news” report and post  more goofy fabricators left off their charts and science-ish models and projections.

Stephen Hawking was interviewed. When asked about climate change he stated, and I quote, “that utardia/scum-puppet, is a moron.”

It’s true. I read it in a “paper” about a consensus of scientists that consensussed together, panelling together to make a consensus of papers that claim the papers are consensus, regarding some scientists, a community of 32 million, that claim Stephen Hawking said just that.

This satire is probably much clearer to you, dear reader, than anything from utardia/scum-puppet/ weird dave/editor/predator, NOAA, WMO, NASA, and AAAS. We are wild and crazy global hoaxers, I mean guys.

Please, fellow Americans, lighten your lives with humor. Go to the aforementioned sites and read, from a perspective of science, the “stuff” they fabricate.

Imagine you are in your high school chemistry class and the lab instructor is introducing a lab experiment. Compare that experience to the fluff and stink of the sophist, pretentious, fraudulent words of the aforementioned sites.

I have made commentary, but I cannot cover it all.

Hawking continued, being the pure scientific mind he is, “All the evidence shows the earth is cooling, heat is escaping the planet in buckets, and I predict minus 100 degrees at the equator by 2750 ADHD.”

No, really, it is true. He actually said that. He consensussed with other global anti-hoaxers, in his usual scientific jargon. lol. Don’t you love, it, buckets? Funny?

Not much different than looking for missing climate of the Louisiana floods. Utardia concocted, “Searching for climate signals…”.

When was the last time “that thing next door, named climate, sent a signal? Was that his order by phone for pizza delivery?

“Climate signals”? that is too funny. 

Didn’t that moron utardia quote some source, hmmmmm, Hawking, who predicted 250 degree temperatures, like Mars, by 2050 because of CO2 emissions from the bottom of the ocean floor?

Is utardia that much of a moron!

When was the last time Hawking was on the ocean floor? When was utardia/political scum-puppet on the ocean floor? When was the last time anyone was on the ocean floor? When was the last time a god, was on the ocean floor, I mean except when he put frozen CO2 ice cakes down there, 250 billion years ago. Was utardia, that moronic dinosaur around then?

How much of fools does utardia take We, the People to be?

That mutt, for that presumption and morose attack on reality, deserves to swing.

It just takes one judge to issue a bench arrest for anyone of the thugs in power. We, the People will rally. We have seen it.

It just takes one!

CRAIGSLIST POST 6/21/16, “Scientific evidence for warming of the climate system is unequivocal.”

RE: “Scientific evidence for warming of the climate system is unequivocal.” 

The following is my response to a post on craigslist in Salt Lake City, June 21, 2016.

In this post the “writer” plagiarizes NOAA with the title of the post and numerous claims throughout.

I write:

Show us the evidence.

What is a climate system? Is dimwit dem/lib talking about a “clime”, or maybe a weather front? These are real terms that reveal real science, understanding, and real knowledge, while “.warming of the climate system…” is at best a non-scientific construct of an alien-structured grammatical mess. Who, what, fabricated this poor collection of words and terms?

Do these dem/libs, fabricating goofy terms and words, think others will wet themselves and follow in line behind simpletons that cannot construct a rational thought?

What is a “…climate system”? What is, “Warming of the climate system…”? Climate is  warming and cooling. This dem/lib is speaking in circles to confuse readers and dazzle unsuspecting readers with his/her/its sophistry (look it up).

Scientific evidence? How could there be evidence when there is no data? Where are the volumes and pages of lists of university studies by PHD students submitting their theses? Where are the measurements, data? Evidence is non-existent without data and a measurement or two. Anyone can pick a topic, go to a library, look up in the indexes for studies done by PHD students on almost anything. This is cutting edge stuff. Anyone can go to the library, look up climate topics and find numerous studies showing the temperatures are dropping.

Suppose I make a claim to illustrate my superior knowledge.

“I know a yard is longer than a meter”, I state.

“How do you know?”, you ask. I reply. “I just know.”

You press, “how long is a yard?” I say, “pretty long, the evidence shows it.” You ask, “how long is a meter?”

I reply, “almost as long as a yard.” You think you have me so you ask me, “If you are comparing the two, how can you know one is longer than the other if you cannot actually compare them. How can you know anything about either measurement if you refer to no studies that compare them, and if you cannot define how long either is?” I reply, “I just know it, the evidence is there.”

Anyone, at this point would ask, “what evidence?”

Besides the fact that I would be dead wrong regarding a yard being longer than the meter, one could also note I totally rejected scientific methodology.

A meter is a full yard plus 3.6 more, MORE inches, making a meter longer than a yard. That is a comparison using a common standard of measuring, to compare the two. This qualifies as data applied. Using one or the other as a standard, and then comparing, would be considered data.

You ask me again, to explain the comparison between the two, and how I can make a comparison without actually comparing variables; without common measurements or data to compare. I reply, “scientific evidence for measuring the measure of a longer yard than a meter, is unequivocal.” At this point you realize you are talking to an uneducated, egomaniacal moron, just as we, the educated and honest conservatives try to communicate with dem/libs, living in “I am special in liberal la-la-land.”

Using an inch to measure two “systems”, and then comparing, we see that a meter is longer than a yard, but a dem/lib would argue against that, if it meant he or she could propagate government stealing from all to give to the dem/lib frauds and liars.

Where is the science? This pseudo-science, injected presumptions played as credible facts, from dem/libs, is almost laughable.

Where is the data? Where is the hypothesis, the theory, the study parameters and interpretations of data? Where is the comparative unit of measure? These things are real characteristics of real science, and the dem/libs haven’t even got a clue how far from real science they are. Lying has a way of making one stupid. In essence, as mom and dad taught us, dem/libs are only fooling themselves.

There  is absolutely nothing credible from the bogus sites because everything is a fabrication.

Everything from liberals is just like my little brother, in third grade, “this guy I know…”, trying to fabricate credibility from a lie. Then he would ramble on to fabricate false truth and “science” to suit his goal, hoping to convince us to give him our money or whatever he wanted.

Notice too, that NOAA is a .gov entity. Government is part of this? Now there is a source for total dishonesty. Why do dem/libs pick and choose which lies from government they want to believe? Are dem/libs so lost in la-la-looney science land that they think it is okay for government to lie as long as it is only lying to conservatives and smart people? The average democrat is at least 10 IQ points below the average republican. Democrats have the uneducated Mexican/muslim vote to factor in their averages. I rest my case.

The fact is that more republicans graduate than democrats. How many Mexicans, do you know, that graduated from college? Do you know just one? The big fraud the democrats proffer is that Mexicans, invaders and the dregs of Mexico, work hard, vote, and are recipients of higher education. Such stupidity, claims connected by nothing except dem/lib lies, is hilarious.

Mexicans in college? How is that possible when the morons cannot even speak English? Who is more ignorant, the Mexican or the dem/libs that persist with bogus claims that are so easily refuted a third grade Mexican him or herself could refute the “lies”?

Remember this and you will know the liberal/progressive/fascist mind: they always want something for no contribution of their own but boast of two things: what they plan to contribute and what they plan to force others to contribute.