Factors were not checked, not questioned in the least. That fact, in and of itself, is very un-scientific. Variables in science must be isolated. Not isolating variables is like something trying to revolve around two points: impossible.

Scientific methodology requires isolating a variable to test that variable and only that variable to determine if it is the cause of the observed effect.

It is impossible to test or use cause-and-effect if the cause is not isolated as the only cause in question.

How many healthy people walked into a hospital with “covid”/“flu” symptoms and were put on ventilators?

Did anyone in “authority” check for direct cause-and-effect in any step of an individual’s or cross-section’s degrading condition through the “covid” “epidemic? Absolutely not. Not a shred of science involved even though those in authority claimed endlessly they “followed the science”. LIES.

Did anyone test to determine if ventilators had poison or lung irritants? That reality must be considered because a pattern emerged when studies were done. There is a pattern of someone entering a care unit with mild symptoms, being convinced to get on a ventilator, and worsening immediately. Tens of thousands died following this pattern.

Science is noticing, measuring patterns and discovering cause-and-effect. Not so with the dementocrats, CDC, NIH, all pharma, and the media.

Vaccines are not the only purposeful killer being used by the dementocrat bolshevik sorcery (pharmakaia) corporations.

Are you familiar with mercury poisoning, animals that drink poisonous antifreeze, aluminum correlation with Alzheimers’, barium, fiberglass, acid and other toxins that affect health: all poisons in vaccines?

Did anyone question masks?

Did anyone question the “booster” meds  and vitamin injections given when people enter the hospitals, and subsequently got sicker?

Did anyone question days of high allergies, replaced with days of high “covid” case numbers that coincide with chemtrail days?

Did anyone try to isolate a single variable, which would have been the execution of scientific methodology to prove or disprove a theory: theory being based on observation?

Did anyone seek to know why children do not get “covid”?

I mentioned two things when this fake pandemic was propagated:

1) children who exercise together, such as swimmers in a pool where their breaths, from breathing heavily in exercise, remained close to the surface of the water, and they breathed an increased number of potential “covid” causes, so-called viruses.

I know of numerous children involved in swimming, training in close quarters, anti-social distancing, and of the numerous swim teams I polled, not one of those children, up to ages of 16 years old, got sick. In some cases not a single child even tested positive for the infamous “covid” ghost.

And so what if people test positive for a ghost virus? How many test positive for “flu”, influenza?

Do you see the contradictions? No, yes?

Why test for “covid” when it does not make people sick and how can you trust tests of sorcerers (pharmakaia)? Look up the etymology (word history) of pharma…

While you are at it, look up the difference between democracy and republic, specifically Constitutional Republic.

Find a “democracy” with a Bill of Rights. 

There is and never was a test or study, or collection and collation of any information regarding critical expansion of cases with symptoms. In other words there never was a study or question of sickness. There was no study or even a question as to other variables that could have contributed to illness or the opposite.

None of the lying goons in the dementocrat party, deep state, unelected elitists even pretended to be interested in ascertaining variables that could mitigate, reduce, eliminate, or conflate  the so-called epidemic of nothing.

So, many have reported that, in spite of limited statistics, studies have shown a number of patterns.

One pattern, reported by Stew Peters, an example of an investigator, is that case after case, thousands, hundreds of thousands, who sought care for all degrees of symptoms, who were subsequently placed on respirators rapidly degraded, then developed serious illness and some died.

How many? What percentage? How many were placed on ventilators and then got worse? Is that something we should know?

If healthy people who showed mild signs or had mild symptoms were placed on ventilators, whose conditions immediately worsened, would you want to know what percentage of those poor souls got worse as a direct result of ventilator use? If you knew ventilators had a sharp cause-and-effect of degrading conditions, would you have stopped someone you know who died while on a ventilator, from submitting to anti-science doctors and hospitals?

Hospital staff constantly coaxed people with mild symptoms to exercise caution, stay and get on a ventilator. What is in the ventilator that caused further sickness?

I am not asking, or even slightly curious about testing results, rather levels of sickness through various treatments and the results.

If one is not sick, one is not sick, but not according to the political doctors of government and media.

No tests or studies were done to determine what made people strong and “immune”. Why not? Not one scientific study was done, not even one question regarding real scientific methodology to determine myriads of variables. In fact, the CDC, NIH, all the players and faucenstein executed gross anti-science.

Why did the whole sorcery industry, including pseudo-medical politicians in un-elected positions, faucenstein, for example, not even posit a slight curiosity as to what made people healthy and immune?

The bolshevik sorcerers had no interest in saving people. Their interest lie in perpetuating fear, and submission to, at best, curious “treatments”, at worst and probably the reality, submission to killing agents.

2) The other example I mentioned was my adult hockey league play through the darkest propaganda of “covid”.

Four teams, mostly men over 40 years old, approximately 60 players, no masks, breathing in close quarters the same “polluted” and “infected” air, and not a single one developed ‘covid”, Not one of us, even the old codgers, tested positive for covid or got sick from covid.

Not one case. Why no question regarding the thousands of similar examples?

Covid does not exist. It never did.

Consider all the variables I have mentioned (and there are more), and ask yourself, where in this “covid” scam was there a reference, mention or question regarding misreads of variables, from the goons of the CDC, NIH, dementocrat party, establishment deep state organizations and the corrupt, international bolshevik media?


Toss the question of why aside for now. Why is because people will live off the labors of others, when they can convince the others they are “serving” the others.

Bullies lie. Bullies use many tactics to control and exploit others. Some bullies do not use force, well, force of their own. They hire police and create centralized, controlled police forces for their own use.

Who created and used BLM, antifa, and destroyed local police forces to be replaced by their corrupted centralized, governmental police forces? Who? Did representative republican congressmen do it, or did they represent the wishes of Americans?

There is absolutely no doubt the guilty party is the dementocrat party and their allies in the corrupt bolshevik/banker media.

Where do we go from here?

If you do not totally rejective corrupt liberal media, and press on to live your life, you are a slave. Most people, in my opinion, are already enslaved, but they love and revere their captors hoping for the fulfillment of empty promises made, while those same promise-breakers get rich, and contribute to the death of individuals and the nation.

The day for revolution is at hand. Read my articles. The day is hidden in my words and those with Constitutional Republic understanding will know. It all starts one day.

Again, no doubt I am treasonous to the U.S. Government, but that government is illegal: illegally granted control over America; power usurped from OUR Representative Government of the Republic of the United States of America.

Check the flags for proof of two governments.

Red, white and blue, the flag of the republic: we the people, the masses.

Red, white, blue and gold-fringed with gold tassels, the flag of the occupying international bolshevik/banker rulers.

Where do you find these flags? You had better start looking and figure it out because you have no rights under the rule of maritime/admiralty law. The tassels represent an “At-War” status, meaning martial law is the governing system, NOW, currently ruling YOU.


Barnett: “The earth’s shape is not a theory. it’s been known for millenia and has been quantified to closer and closer tolerances as time and scientific advances progress. FE? Bwahaa…. It’s nonsensical drivel..or dribble for those that foam it out their mouthes.”

Scores and scores of fake profiles all doing nothing but post fake-science, amazingly all in favor of globe-theory earth. Something is surely going on that brings so many ignorant goons together to propagate so many, and all the same, lies.

My Reply:

Known by whom? What tolerances? Barnett has no idea, surely regurgitating spew from his/her/its master handler. Again, Roger, tell us, what tolerances? What is the margin of error? Tell us what scientific progress it is that uses CGI and drawings to make a fake photo of earth, when nobody has ever been “in space”? You lying pos. Known by whom, Aristotle, Heracles, Herodotus, Jason and the Argonauts, Dustin the wind? What a loser! Nobody has known for millennia. What a sewage-sucking fraud! It is that simple.

For all reading this, by many things bolshevik-dick wrote, you can surely see how ignorant and un-scientific everything of dick-roger’s comment is. But, especially and specifically obvious is this: how does one “quantify” something that is not a quantity? 

Known for millennia? Who are you trying to fool? Even the dumbest of dumb, you anti-science, scientific methodology retards cannot be so stupid to totally ignore reality AND history. Are you really so stupid and grotesquely, fat, ugly and lying!

Your stupid pretense (millennia) is not only a stretch of gross magnitude, considering the Bible has been around for millennia, but even you, a real pseudo-person cannot be that stupid to ignore the reality that globe-theory is a theory. Do you realize that when someone says a word they mean it, like theory means theory?

But it is okay. I get where you are coming from and I have a picture of your “profile” and will post it to my site, with my reply, a shit-kicking for you for all to see, and beyond so others can see just how fake and politically motivated, sub-human you filthy bolshevik NASA agents are. You lie like a rat you filthy rotten agent provocateur.


“China has a missile that was previously thought impossible”

Yes, China has a missile nobody thought could be created, but there is evidence it can exist; that it could have been created. This evidence is observation that other missiles exist and technology applied and working in other areas has a potential to be applied to create supersonic missile technology.

This is the first phase of scientific methodology: observation.

The theory of flying bombs is more than just theory. “Flying” bombs exist. We know it. In science terminology, we call this observation. Predicting, another phase of science, is extending already observed realities using existing technology, not theory. This makes an extension of known observations possible and believable.

This extension is not possible where there is no observation such as  fake disciplines of climate changeling and “space” travel/globe-theory.

Again, theory based on theory is bad theory and can predict absolutely nothing except silly imagination.

This fertilization of imagination-based theory is the core of modeling in “science” today, particularly climate changeling and globe-earth theory and “space” travel/globe-theory.

If all one can produce is unobservable imagination of modeling and fake theory based on unsubstantiated theory, then one has nothing. When theory is based on theory, there is no evidence from which a reality can be extrapolated. This is climate changeling today, and globe-eath/space speculation.

All one need to do, to observe the unobservable climate-changeling and “space travel/globe-theory theories, is to pay attention to the words of those who promote: “models”.


In response to Floyd Barker, on Facebook, denied publication by craigslist, December 21, 2021

No idea what goes into a shot? Are you really that stupid? You can find every ingredient in every single vaccine, right there in black and white, everywhere: numerous sites with lists, long, long lists of all vaccines. What a dimwitted lying pos. All vaccines have a few common ingredients: mercury, acid, antifreeze, etc., etc., etc.. Some have rat poison, fluoride.

I always wondered, if acid breaks down cellular components, how acid in a vaccine does not dissolve bacterium that is supposed to activate immunological response? DNA is found in the mitochondria but acid breaks down the mitochondria as easily as it dissolves cell membranes. 

Please explain herd immunity? You have no idea because you are a droning moron, classically conditioned to stupidity, left only to attack others because you have no intellect. You forgot many of the talking points. You think you are smart because you, millions of you, trained like dogs to bark at a certain pitch when confronted and afraid. Coward! Woof woof!

Explain in your own words, why smallpox has not been eradicated? Is it because it is impossible to eradicate a virus? Tell us what natural body function kills a virus? Look it up. Tell us all how smart you are.

Tell us, just for a little side bar, what soap does to a cell membrane, and why, and what does soap do to a virus? Why is soap good for simple antiseptic for bacterial infection? Everybody is watching to see just how smart you are. Show us.

I will dash your lies and words, but give it your best third grade shot. Tell us how it is that people with three vaccinations are still getting covid. Can you isolate the variable in question? Do you know what that means? Do you know what scientific methodology is? No? Just another droning regurgitating moron. Skulk away little coward.

Hey everybody. Go to my website and read: 400+ articles, Just opinion, based on many things, scientific things and characteristics of science, in fact. Open your minds. This imbecile cannot, but you can.

If you go and look with a mind to destroy then you destroy yourself. However if you go to pursue truth wherever it takes you, you will make friends, yourself first. Maybe Floyd Barkey can tell us why it is impossible to acquire immunity from HIV. Is it because once someone gets it, it does not die or run away from caustic rhetoric, like goons in liberal la-la-land? Is that a characteristic of all viruses? YEPPERS. Does moronicus dumb-assius, floyd barker, know this? What does that dimwitted goon actually know? Does anybody care? Maybe dimwit can direct us to his microbiology masters’ thesis? No? Hmmmmm, how about mine?


Has anyone gone back and looked at the computers used in the space program of the 1960s? Not only is it archaic but if it is true that those computers were less tchnologilly capable than vehicles today there is no way they could respond fast enough for a trip around th corner to the grocery store.

Have you ever watched th computer geeks at the command posts, as they worked, apparently worked? They do nothing. What are they working on? Were they using Pascal, rotunda or caveman programming?

For gawd’s sake, there is nothing they could do while a so-called space ship was in flight. How slow would those computers have been? An abacus would have been faster.

The speed of computation could not have been ay faster than personal computers of the 1990s and early 2000s, slow.

Two variables to consider: how fast was data gathered while those nerds sat at those boxes, and how fast could a caveman computer translate the data and by what programs was data acquired and interpreted?

You will find no answers because the mute, colluding corrupt media was in in the scam.

Take your first cell phone out of retire, text a few sentences, go to the internet, wait for it, wait for it….oh yeah, forgot, not 5G, or 4G, or 1G. It was bits per second, analog, not wireless or fiber.

It must have been a hell of a long telecommunications cable going from the NASA command center and following that space craft as it left orbit and wrapped around the earth a few times on its way to the :moon”.

How did they communicate with the space craft, radio waves? Too slow. How fast does sound travel in a ir? How fast does sound travel in a vacuum? How fast does radio wave travel in air? How fast in a vacuum? Does it?

I do not know, I am asking.

Has everybody forgotten? It was NASA that created space flight then and it is NASA fabricating global warming today.

Take a look at the scientific paper I have included for your sensory bombardment.

I was in the labs in my university eduction. Every lab experience, every experiment, every investigation at the library into prior studies and experiments, began with an outline, description of the study and/or experiment. Every single study and experiment had a hypothesis, a mode of collection of data, parameters for collating and interpreting data, and a means of connecting the intended data to a predetermined effect of defined and isolated causes. Cause and effect was clearly identified, defined, and organized.

We have never seen a shred from NASA.

Today we are bombarded with effects and solutions taken from absolutely nothing resembling cause, stimulus, data, measurements or predetermined collation methodology.

There was absolutely nothing in the aluminum foil days of the LM of Apollo 11, 12 13. Three trips to the moon with landings, organized and directed by nerdy geeks on computers with less power than your watch today. IMPOSSIBLE!

We are being grotesquely and grossly manipulated, deceived, exploited and discarded.

NASA, IPCC, NOAH, WMO, AAAS, and others are all void of cause, data, measurements, but they all offer up effects without connection to their stated causes. There must be data, pre and post testing, isolation of a variable to test and hypothesized variable. Never do we see a control group of control data. NEVER! How is solution possible without cause? Impossible!


Such lies and deception. How does anybody know how long it took to make? It is all theory until we have data, a measurement comparing older measurements. That photo is probably taken in Norway, anyway.

Do you see how they lie? They show results and effects, and make claims, ignoring a pursuit of data, and then offer a political solution to a pseudo-science fabrication.

A simple cause and effect is a beginning of science but they show the effect they want and purposely, falsely claim it is the result of a cause they skim over and/or erroneously connect.

They, the goons of global hoaxing, a political cabal, claimed Greenland was losing 10 percent of its ice every year. How much is it adding when it gets cold? Do you see how totally lacking in accuracy and hence, honesty these global hoaxing goons are?

Greenlan does add ice when it is cold. Water freezes to become ice. How big of a project would it be to collect data and catalogue the expanses, valleys and mountains to determine the amount of ice now, and do the same in the future for “scientific” comparisons? This is a massive project but the goons do not even take a simple first step, one measurement.

Greenland losing 10 percent per annum? Those losers have not ever looked at 10 percent of that massive continent. Liars! Furthermore, if it took 250,000 years to make that ice, that figure certainly figures into the equation of how fast Greenland is losing ice, if it is Greenland. It should be noted that Greenland is called Greenland because in the past it was green. It is still white covered in ice. varying ice thicknesses all over the land mass? It could not be done with mere speculative guessing and absolutely no mention of a single measurement. LIARS!


JR Emiston:

I never call flat earthers conspiracy theorists. At best, I call them ill-informed. Many, not all, misunderstand scientific terms, such as ‘theory.’ Many, not all, are also guilty of poor English, which diminishes their (already severely limited) credibility

My Reply:

Does JR mean poor grammar? It appears JR has less of an understanding of communication than he would have others believe. Theory is not a term, rather a word. I could just as easily write that globers have no understanding of some scientific terms, as does JR, but JR totally missed the whole picture. Science is not just a few words, and theory is not scientific in the least. The whole picture is referred to as scientific methodology, and theory is only a beginning, wondering upon observation of change. Theory leads to hypothesis which is then proved or disproved by the whole process of isolating a variable, measuring before and after, setting up test and experimental conditions, collating, and interpreting data. Theory is totally void of data. Furthermore, when someone uses the term conspiracy theory, besides being clear they do not know what it is, they admit they have nothing except insult and a poor, worn-out cliché, a brazen attempt to distract from lack of data, measurements, the whole scientific process. It is an attempt to make ignorant believers of others. It is wrong, immoral, dishonest, and self-destructive. Those who “create” data by lying and insulting with name-calling, such as conspiracy theorist, are liars, not to be believed, trusted, or given a shred of credibility. Conspiracy theory name-calling is very much like crying wolf. It leaves the cryer vulnerable by his ir her own misguided, self-serving fabrications. Cry wolf 3 times and when a real wolf attacks, nobody helps. This simple postulate applies in everything. so when I am called a conspiracy theorist, I realize I am being assailed by a conspiracy theory theorist, that is totally ignorant of almost everything. And JR, basically called flat earth believers, conspiracy theorists. There is only one “side” of politics that runs away from a fight with the term “conspiracy theory”. Sad to be part of a losing “theory” that cannot present decent, honest arguments. I could not live as such a sub-human. I adjust when faced with reality. After all, isn’t the survival of the “fittest” idea, in reality, survival of those who adapt to change? I did believe the earth was a globe. Not sure now, especially since the biggest argument is to use distraction and insult, calling plane earth believers conspiracy theorists.



June 3rd, 2021, predicting near record temperatures for June 4th, 2021.

The “NEWS” was that tomorrow’s forecast could produce record breaking highs. Part of the forecast predicted that June 4th could also be the earliest SLC area would hit triple digit highs.  Did not happen. “They” tried to make it appear that 100 was reached but you must look at the reality.

At 5:00 PM temperatures start to drop. Seldom do temperatures rise after 5:00 PM, if ever. The temperature stayed at 98 degrees for hours, even an hour after 5:00 PM, then suddenly it bolted to 100 degrees, like it was thinking it needed to respond to a command.

If you doubt this then you have no idea what science is, partially because you have never exercised it.

Science is change. If you have not paid attention, or scrutinized past events and patterns, you will not only be oblivious to reality and science, but you will remain part of the truly, ignorant masses. Everybody gets messages on their phone about temperatures, at any given moment. From where do these arrive? Do these temperatures come from the centralized (bad sign) official source? What is the official source? Have you thought about that? No? Do you know the difference between intellect and intelligence? Do you know what deductive reason is? No? Then do not question my observations.

It is all part of global hoaxing, warming, that is not warming. Please, learn scientific methodology and find scientific methodology, even just one characteristic of it, in any of the so-called climate sites.

Go to my section of CLIMATE CHANGE/GLOBAL WARMING and read, learn.


Original publication on SLC Craigslist, June 15, 2016, in response to a post by Utardia, a “writer”, regurgitator of marxist/liberal climate dogma.

The burden of scientific proof rests with the prosecution. There is two basic results of science: proving a theory or hypothesis, or failing to prove a theory or hypothesis.

Utardia, that dimwit lying crap-superstar, claims I need to provide proof. Is that proof of a negative? Is that proof that where I stand exists?

A tradition is immovable until it is movable, by something new, and obvious. Global hoaxing, I mean warming, is magnificently NOT obvious, except to dictatorial goons making big bucks off others’ fears, and obvious to bogus scientists extrapolating something from clearly NOTHING. When I say nothing I mean no data, no pre-test, no post test, no control group, no measurements, but lots of polluting and “reinterpreting” standard, immovable data.

It is all a fraud, a lie based on imaginary demons and fire breathing dragons, heating up the world. Where are the dragons other than the nether reaches of political scientists’ ever-augmenting ethereal interpretations of imaginary science from cosmological shock troops?

I might add that all those innumerable “climate scientists” do not exist. There are writers galore, political puppets who quote each others’ papers and stories of studies.

“The oceans will rise by 20 feet by the year 2015”, 144,000 Witnesses of Jehovah will be taken heavenward in 1918, I mean 1933, I mean 1975, I mean 1999, I mean okay who is this Jehovah guy”? “The climate system will kill millions by 2012”. Pictures of moose dying, deserts and dead fish on the shores all cause world-wide stench by 2010”. Obama will turn back the rise of the oceans by shear will power.

Some will argue he did it. Then why do we need anything else? Why do we need political exertion, taxation and subservience to the democrat party and liberals when obama can do it all?

Come on people, the oceans have not risen, temperatures have dropped. It is colder today, it cools off at night, and summers are shorter. Fewer people die from heat waves today than they did 20, 30 and 40 years ago.

We stand on solid ground of tradition. Somebody designed a thermometer well over a century ago, and that same thermometer is the standard.

What is the standard?

Water boils at 212 degrees at sea level, and freezes at 32 degrees. There is no change in that. That is the standard. Who will challenge that? Who would even think that this fact is not one of the world’s most reliable templates? 

Why do global hoaxers, I mean warmers, even attempt to change these standards?

We can always make new thermometers at the boiling point, and and it is still the standard because it is still the boiling point and we design and change OURSELVES to that fact.

Global hoaxers, I mean warmers, have been trying to change We, the People, and reality to their inconsistent and shifting predictions. They have no standards because they are sloppy, pretentious, anti-science comic-cons. Where is the data?

Data is not data unless it has a standard and a means of measuring preconditions and new, or changing conditions. This is science, the beginning of science.

How do we measure time? We measure it by change. We make a 24 hour day of a time frame between sunrise and another sunrise. We don’t dictate that we want 24 hours in a day, and make the planet rotate different. But that is the approach global hoaxers, I mean warmers, have taken.

We do not look at the sunrise and try to slow it down so we can have 25 hour days. That is ludicrous. It borders on insanity if not full blown lunacy. But that is what global hoaxers, I mean warmers, are trying to do with no data, no pre-test, no post-test, no measurements, and no sea level markers. They have not even tried to present this simple experiment because it is a failure every time.

Surely, somewhere along the way, maybe 10 years ago, maybe 20 or 30 years ago, someone, a real scientist, must have surely stuck a stick in the water and measured ocean levels regularly to show ocean-level rise. Why has no scientist presented this data? Would this data be irrefutable if it could be found to show a rise in ocean levels? Absolutely, and I would concur. But there is not one single reference to a stick in a rock anywhere? Absolutely nothing! NOAA, for example, has absolutely nothing that represents a stick in a rock, or anything an intellect could imagine and design to measure change.

So, I ask, are oceans rising? Surely it must be obama that stopped the rise, with just his word.

How much did it rise before he made the promise? ZERO! That was a  pretty safe bet for him, was it not.

It must be zero, otherwise dem/lib politico/scientists would have shown us. NOTHING!

The burden of proof is always on the upstarts, the new science, the new theories and hypotheses.

I am a cop, standing in the middle of the street, directing traffic. Who will argue that traffic flows at my standard, stable, already existing presence?

It takes a pre-test to assert the variables for the study, and it takes measurements of some sorts (maybe time lapse of driver response due to traffic officer’s directions, as compared to time lapse when traffic officer is not present).

You see, dear reader, the burden of proof is not only on the new science, or new theory or new hypothesis to show a change, but it is a heavy burden to first show the standards by which change will be measured and then presented as illuminating.

There is nothing obvious in dem/lib global hoaxing, I mean warming, except the raging lunacy of pseudo-scientists fabricating fear and catastrophe from lunatics’ imaginations, all done for money.

It is not my burden to provide truth to an existing science. The burden of proof, in science and almost everything, lies solely with the party making new claims or challenging established thought and tradition. The burden of proof lies with those trying to show change. Science is change, measurable change. If it is not measured there is no data, no measurable change and, hence, no science.

Global hoaxing, I mean warming, is the new claim of change, without a shred or attempt to show the change.

I see it this way. When I was a boy, some days when I would arrive at home after school I would walk in the door and smell baking. Imagine I walked in the house, and my mother says, “do you smell that?” Smell what, I ask. “The baking bread, she replies.” No.

“Well, I smell it and it is good”, she claims. Hmmm I do not smell anything.

“No matter”, she says, “will you wash the bread pans please?”

What bread pans? “The ones I baked the bread with”, she she says.

Ok, I guess you see bread pans.

“Of course I do”, she emphatically states, “right there on the counter by the sink.”

Okay, I believe you. Here I am, washing bread pans.

When I am finished washing imaginary bread pans, I sit at the kitchen table and my mother then places an empty plate before me and says, “enjoy the freshly baked bread”.

Okay mom.

In this anecdote, would you think my mother had lost something? Why do global hoaxers try the same with you and I? Are they insane or dishonest?

Global hoaxing, I mean warming, has the burden of proof, and that is why it fails so miserably. There is not even an attempt to provide pre-test conditions, post-test, hypothesis. My mother could have placed store-bought bread on plate, and tried to convince me she had baked it. Without the pre-test conditions: aroma of freshly baked bread, used bread pans and flour on the counter, I am not convinced. The global hoaxing, I mean warming, community, that does not exist except in papers by writers, tries the same. They show nothing with which a comparison, or change can be made.

I come home from school occasionally to the smell of freshly baked brread, and that is a change from the day before, and many days prior. Where is the change in the global hoaxing, I mean warming, claims?

Do we remember our science projects in grade school? The lab paper had a section for observation.

Today’s global hoaxers, I mean warmers, cannot even present “observations”. They make all kinds of claims and protests. Well, they try to present observations but any so-called observations I have investigated are always observations of something else, they claim is connected to itself. They present fear, based upon imaginary dragons fabricated for pseudo-scientists’ financial gain; fabricated by monster-imagining writers.

After the fact observations are nothing if there is no pre-fact observations. The global hoaxers never provide pre-test observations, only claims.

Where are the observations, measurements, standard by which change can be observed?

How can global hoaxers, I mean warmers, make observations without anything to observe, and how can they draw conclusions without anything to observe taken from nothing presented? There is an incredible lack of connection in all this global hoaxing “concluding” without establishing and observing.

Did the morons, for example, observe dying polar bears? Where?

Did the boneheads observe a rise in the sea level of the stick in the rock on the shore? Did the rock move? Did the boneheads move the rock? Who would do such a grievous assault on science, fact and truth itself? Liars, with a political motive. Welcome to global hoaxing!

It is not my responsibility to prove another’s theory wrong, it is the party challenging established thought and tradition that is responsible for proving truth and credibility of his or her claims and theories. Until he or she provides data, measurements, clinical and or laboratory work, the theories remain theories.

The change of scientific belief is not a fact until it is actually factual. All the global hoaxers have is fear, fabrication, and quoting other’s fears and fabrications: all for money.

The NOAA site is a fantasy of global hoaxers, I mean warmers, continually augmenting fear from fear, and from third party fear and fabrication. It is easy to see when they start talking in circles.

Science is proved, often, when scientists and the free market are convinced. I have used the invention of the rifle as an example.

When rifling was first theorized and explained, denying a better flight by a rifled bullet compared to a musket ball was accepted. That is science. After obvious proofs and evidence: observations of rifle accuracy compared with musket accuracy, denying rifles provide a better, more accurate flight, was considered rifling denial. The deniers did not last long. They were killed in the battle lines because they refused to adapt to the science: the proof by observing pre-test and post-test. They refused to change their views to fact and reality.

It is logic retardation that dimwit utardia tries to present nothing to the public as a rational argument. Global hoaxing presents observation-less observations: unsubstantiated claims.

Again, where are the observations? Where are the obvious results, of something, anything, even attempts to lie or deceive?

We are not asking for fear mongering, predictions, models or quotes from others without the necessary facets of science. We want observations and the obvious, nothing else will do. We want IRREFUTABLE science.


This commentary is in response to a comment on Craigslist. I have provided no quotes or references, but this is how I have waged the war on craigslist for 12 years. I respond to the already existing post, writing to the readers and not the author or agent posting the comment. I do not flag to remove posts because I want readers to see just how whacky, dishonest and vague dem/libs are and how near absolutely unsubstantiated dem/lib claims are.


If nuns, locked away, caught COVID, it is not passed how the non-scientific scientists and political health agents claim.

Can anyone say deductive reason, scientific methodology?

Masks, lockdowns serve a different purpose, unknown to We, the People.

The bastard National Governors Association held secret meetings in which they were instructed as to how to work this collusion to seize our country.

It is not for money. Soros and the rich already have more than they can spend. In addition they easily seem to make more.

The democrat/bolshevik politically elite are executing a genocidal plan and everyone is afraid of a bug nobody has identified or tested.

We are also being set up for property seizures with another, non-governmental, unrepresentative, unelected agency with more power than congress. The EPA is advertising a new mysterious killer that does not kill. Radon gas is non-existent.

Just as specialists can enter private passwords to tamper with vote counting; just as the COVID exists without a shred of scientific methodology involved in any part; just as congress has nothing to do with chemtrails spewing lung irritants such as aluminum and barium metals; just as the EPA endorses mercury poison and rat poison (fluoride), without congress making laws; just as the politicians claim they are working with business for a brand new fascist economy and lockdown; just as politicians claim they have the science for COVID that does not exist; just as politicians claim they have the science for global warming/climate change, that does not exist; so too goes the political involvement in democracy, taking representative government from We, the People, and nobody sees it.

How ignorant, as a people we have become.

This is war, they declared and execute it before our eyes, and the masses think the rulers like, respect, and serve us.

Hang them all! Start with the anti-representation, democracy-mongers, the democrats.