BOTH RUSSIA AND CHINA PROFIT WITH AMERICA’S DEMISE AND DESTRUCTION. ALLIES? PART 2, LOGISTICS

USS. Nimitz CVN-68 Washington state

South China Sea

USS Dwight D Eisenhower CVN-69 Norfolk Virginia

North Atlantic 2/20/21

USS Carl Vinson CVN-70 Jan 2021 home port moved to San Diego

joins Roosevelt and Lincoln

USS Theodore Roosevelt CVN-71. San Diego

4/10/21 S China Sea

USS Abraham Lincoln CVN-72 carrier strike group 12, San Diego

Mideast, Iran

USS George Washington CVN-73 Norfolk

dry dock

USS John Stennis CVN-74 San Diego

2/19/21, dry dock til 2025

USS Harry S. Truman CVN-75 Naples Italy

in dock

USS Ronald Reagan CVN-76 Washington

Japan

USS H.W. Bush CVN-77 Norfolk

Suez Canal

USS Gerald Ford CVN-78 Norfolk

in testing, Atlantic

West coast

Nimitz docked

Vinson docked

Roosevelt S China Sea

Lincoln Middle East

Stennis docked til ‘25

Reagan Japan

Six of 11 carriers on Pacific coast:

three docked, out of commission and sitting ducks;

three unavailable for continental defense, deployed at distance with time-consuming detours around islands and continents.

East coast

Eisenhower North Atlantic

Washington docked

Truman docked, politics

H.W. Bush Suez Canal

Ford testing, partially operable

Five of 11 carriers on Atlantic coast:

two docked, out of commission and sitting ducks;

one operable with mechanical technological challenges;

two unavailable for continental defense, deployed at distance with time-consuming detours around islands and continents. 

BOTH RUSSIA AND CHINA PROFIT WITH AMERICA’S DEMISE AND DESTRUCTION. ALLIES?

My apologies for whipping off another unedited commentary. This, like other quickly constructed commentaries, could possibly, soon be edited when I magically find time.

Both Russia and China gain with America’s demise. Allies?

I could leave this issue right there for all the questions that follow.

Why is China so obsessed with Taiwan? China sees Taiwan as an easy fruit to reach and take. No, not so.

Taiwan has allies. American fleets are in the South China seas and ready to engage. China’s navy does not have a chance, unless we are missing something.

Have I mentioned that war is deception? Sun Tzu’s principle, feign weakness in strength and hit with strength when your enemy believes you are weak, and far away. I paraphrase.

What protracted war attacking Taiwan would China expect? Maybe China has the materiel to build a bridge to Taiwan so they can pump endless numbers of troops into conflict. China has endless numbers of troops.

They could do what the Russians did, Prisoners, dissidents and political prisoners were always first waves, often with firearms limited to a small percentage. Instructions were to attack, running, without a weapon. If someone dies, pick up the gun, and carry on. Machine guns were ready for those who retreated. Often Ukrainian or Belorussian troops led the charges, often with weapns, but the slaughter left “pure” Russians free to live and fight another day.

China could do the same. Uighers, muslims, dissidents, drafted and forced Hong Kong residents, China has at least 10 times the manpower Russia had.

If China can only gain a beachhead and land troops in an endless stream, China can take any country.

Russia, in spite of losing 20 to 30 million people, of an estimated total population of 120 million, maintained its control on all vassal states. If Russia can do all that, with limited resources and technology, China can do the same.

But, war is deception. Just what is China really after?

What would be China’s primary goal? Would it be Taiwan, the region shared with India? Would China’s ultimate goal be Mongolia or bordering territory with Russia?

Any nation with true survival in mind; any rulership with true survival in mind must identify enemies and economic challenges, respectively. America is China’s enemy.

China is America’s enemy.

War is deception. What is China feigning and what are Chinese forces really planning behind the feign?

Mao Ze Dong had a burning desire to take Taiwan because those he defeated escaped. He wanted them dead and he had not achieved absolute victory. Pride was certainly involved. China’s ruler Zhe, has no pride stake in this folly.

What is China feigning and why?

China has been investing in true infrastructure in Africa, for decades while the biden pseudo administration and the dementocrats have been investing in inter-structure, repairing broken hearts and repaying political debts.

Unbeknownst to the world China not only has made inroads and money in Africa, China has allies.

China, if we do not wake up, will be the next British Empire, expanding everywhere.

Does China have a “Final Solution” for the world, the USA? Yes.

Expert in sports tactics, I watch a team flood a zone for a pass or a shot. Other zones are exposed, vacant, easily exploited.

America, under the biden treason, is flooding many zones leaving one exposed: the Atlantic.

Access to an exposed zone in sports is risky, but it is a game. An intercepted pass and quick dodge turns the ball or puck over, a pass to a free zone is made, and break-away increases chances of scoring.

Exposing a zone such as the east coast of America is a purposeful surrender by the dementocrats and progressive bolsheviks. They want to rule and eliminate enemies. What else?

What feigning are the dementocrats executing and why?

Social programs is feigning service while flooding numerous zones, social, state, psychological, health, Black Sea, Middle East, and Pacific, and leaving scant defenses in the Atlantic, particularly the east coast.

Democrats have a beachhead. No matter how you look at it. Conflict will be the order of the day should true patriots realize Washington and close ports are undefended or poorly defended and exploitable.

What land force are available close to Washington D.C.?

Where are USS carriers?

USS Nimitz, USS Vinson and USS Stennis are all out of commission under repairs in west coast bases. All three are sitting ducks with nothing to prevent attacks in between S China Sea and West coast of America. Another Pearl Harbor in the works?

USS Roosevelt S. China sea, USS Lincoln deployed to Middle East  and USS Reagan deployed to Japan, Not one would be able to intercept or catch a Chinese carrier group. Would Chinese carrier group include troop carriers?

When I began investigating the vulnerability of east cost America, my feeling was that the east coast had been left open to attack. To my amazement and shock, I discovered both coasts are open and vulnerable.

East coast carriers include USS Eisenhower, deployed to North Atlantic; USS Washington in dry dock; USS Truman in dock and political limbo; USS H.W. Bush deployed to Suez Canal, and USS Ford, in testing and struggles with new technology.

All deployed vessels except the Ford are far from home. Routes from Africa to the east coast are an open invitation to invade. Portsoft the west coast are also open, invitation to invade.

A feigned attack on Taiwan can be executed without aircraft carrier Liaoning. Liaoning can slip past two carrier groups in the far Pacific and head for West coast. Dementocrats will welcome and shut down radar. They hate America, remember.

Is it insane that three of six aircraft carriers at one time are out of commission, and the other three are deployed about as far away from west coast intervention, as any location could be?

The west coast is more of a sitting duck than ever, since before WWII.

Of 11 carriers, five are out of commission. Five are far from return to defend coastlines form landing invasions, and one is questionable, perhaps close to home on the east coast; perhaps capable of mounting a defense depending on enemy strength.

In essence America has one potentially limp carrier, without a carrier group, defending two coasts.

Who did this?

If you are a democrat party supporter, liberal or progressive, you may think this is a coincidence, an oversight by the department of defense, or someone or some agency.

Considering the NEWS you may or may not have heard or read, The biden administration is in bed with Chinese communists and America-hating Iran.

If biden moves a fleet into the Black Sea, it is a sitting duck. Turkey can tiurn, Russia can gain, Turkey could open a path for Iran to get to the Black Sea, and America could lose an entire fleet to nothing more than rocket attacks from numerous shore batteries, some of which can easily be land-mobilized batteries.

Biden and the dementocrat party have had the American demise and destruction planned for years. It began with the attack on truth, as all war always does.

American troops still stateside are also divided. American civil war will be short-lived with an invasion force made up of Chinese carriers, troops craft from Africa, Iranians, possibly North Koreans.

All things we see distract from real war.

I have not even begun to investigate land forces. I am certain anything close to Washington D.C., district of criminals, has been moved away or recruited to protect Washington and the political monsters that have removed We, the People from our self-governing representative Constitutional Republic.

The only way to save America is to eliminate enemies of We, the People: democrat party, and progressives behind public purview.

Sure, this is all speculation. Well, no, not all. The deployments of aircraft carriers is irrefutable. The reasons why the incapacity to defend American coastlines is, however, speculative.

Two points to consider: 1) one can argue that leaving American coasts undefended is an oversight or mistake. How can generals, admirals, caring politicians, and American military tacticians all make this mistake when surely, of the many involved in America’s defenses somewhere along the chain of command someone surely would have mentioned the glaring vulnerabilities. One must surely find it hard to believe that so many experts could make this mistake, and none be able to point it out. It is easier to believe that this is planned by those placed in positions who want the destruction of America; 2) This abandonment is purposeful. Military prudence dictates assuming and preparing for the worst. It may be hard to know why, and just as difficult in determining the source of abrogation, but the facts are the facts. American coastlines are vulnerable.

 

Pearl Harbor: Japan attacked and the democrats turned the war against Americans. Originally published 6/19/16.

Pearl Harbor: Japan attacked America and immediately the democrat politicos turned a declaration and act of war; an attack on America, into a democrat party political war against Americans. The democrat politicos and liberals, and the liberal media acted in concert, as if they had been waiting for just such an act of aggression to launch their preplanned attack. Immediately the democrat party politicos began calling for a ban on assault weapons: not for Japan, but for America.
The liberal media and democrat party political machine went into high gear impugning America and Americans for Japan’s attack on Pearl Harbor, calling it an attack against an Asian/islander “community”, as if Hawaii was not part of America but its own predetermined focal point for reasons other than it being a weakly defended, strategic naval base. The Democrat/Asian/Hawaiian “community” referred to itself as being special for being unique and deflected the discussion from Hawaii being an American state to Hawaii being a “community” with identifiable “victims”.
The democrat party even took the hatred for Americans further, calling for internment of Americans, categorized by democrats, as Japanese-Americans. The democrats, under democrat party president, Roosevelt, seized Americans’ property.
Obviously the “ban” on assault weapons such as tanks, machetes, sharpened bamboo poles, aircraft, ships, frigates, trucks, rifles, grenades, mortars, and the deadly “automatic assault submarines” was a ban on those that refused to accept the law, the Japanese invaders. The scenario sounds a lot like criminals in America that refuse to obey law already in place. Those willing to attack, kill, and invade other nations are hardly likely to respect the laws of that nation, refusing to heed the ban of weapons that give them advantage. Criminals that are already willing to kill certainly have no respect or fear for lesser laws.
Will we continue with this forced-compliance insanity?
Banning Japanese assault weapons, and weapons of mass destruction (bombs etc.) did not stop the Japanese from waging war and “banning” weapons on a smaller scale, both instances involving people that will freely and unconscionably ravage and kill others, will not stop enemies of any nation, group, and individual. It is as plain as the nose on your face, unless a liberal declares the nose is to blame for an attacker’s fist that break it.
Should we ban assault fists?