Theory based on theory is still only theory and not reality.

I watched a video of someone talking about time travel and how it was related to the use of black holes. Has anyone seen a black hole?

Seriously, has anyone been to a black hole? Has anyone actually seen a black hole by looking into the sky?

Who has claimed to have seen a black hole?

Who has seen a flux capacitor? Who has seen a spaceship?

Who has taken a picture of the earth from the heavens?

Why no pictures?

We were shown a picture of the earth through a window in 1969, so the story, from a so-called expert, goes.

If “they” could put a window in a spaceship then it can be done now, so surely there must be a window in all the rockets launched since. What would it take to place an automated camera in position to take pictures?

You can find videos that debunk the 1969 earth picture as a drawing behind a window in a dark room.

Incidentally, it is the same picture of the earth we are shown all the time.

Now, before you go crazy, yes, you, not me myself; before you go off your deep end writing words in your mind I have not written, stop.

Did I, myself, say I was a flat-earther or are you saying it? Did I say I did not believe in science, as I pound keys on my laptop, or are you going to extrapolate an irrefutably stupid conclusion from the opposite of evidence?

Has anyone proved gravity is what “science” theorizes? Yes, gravity is still a theory.

I look at water as it pours from a faucet. Have you noticed that water in many instances separates as it drops. I am not talking about spray. I have not theorized regarding water not falling directly “down”.

If water separates there must be a force to push strands of water from each other. Is that, perhaps, the same force that drags water down?

So, am I anti-science or just wondering about what theory of gravity is correct or  close? Do you feel a need to attack me for wondering? Are you experiencing fear regarding your beliefs because I, myself, wonder? I do not have fears in wondering; wondering about anything. I can switch my views according to reality. Can you?

I was quite involved in religion many years ago. I believed the Bible to be the word of god and believed in a supreme being and, in fact three deities, God the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit.

My belief system was tied to a belief in the originator and origination of the sect.

My belief system included a belief that Jesus, the Christ, was the source of mankind’s conscience. I believed that to deny conscience, the source, would make a man drift towards anti-social disordered behavior: psychopathy or sociopathy.

But my belief system was undermined by some revelations and my research, and I totally quit that religion.

I completely gave up belief in a supreme being when I discovered that I controlled my conscience and my commitment to living by conscience was connected o my desire to remain a decent human being. Of course some will challenge, based on their hate-motivated, fear-originated ignorance, not mine.

For 16 years I was a non-believer in God.

Lately, however, I wonder, again.

Too many coincidences and study of the sources themselves of alternate theories, regarding the earth, history and the mind have prompted me to wonder, again, if there is some order to this world.

I have constantly called the theory of relativity into question. It is a mathematical theory, you do realize? Who, of the many people you know, has travelled at the speed of light? Nobody?

Do you remember a day when science theorized that to travel in a vehicle faster than 50 miles per hour one’s head would explode? You don’t remember that?

Do you remember a day when doctors made house calls and prescribed herbs? Do you remember a day when there were no such food additives and drugs, and chemicals in humanity’s lives?

Do you recall ads describing smoking as good? Do you remember the pilgrims coming to America with large lumbering cows, or did they bring goats?

No matter what Newton called it, an apple fell from a tree, he observed it, and gave it a name. Somehow gravity stuck.

What is the latinate root of the word gravity?

Latinate gravitatem, gravitas means weight, heaviness, pressure, from the root gravis, heavy.

What started this ponderance is still a theory, time travel.

All the science fiction movies, most of them absolutely stupid, are based upon theories, and that is it.

Even my favorite sci-fi, Blade Runner, is based upon a theory, space travel.

Of course, that is based upon a brief I have that we have no real evidence of space travel in man’s history.

I am convinced man did not go to the moon.

I am convinced that computers preprogrammed according to theories and models, in the 1960s, could calculate that which could barely be seen and mapped.

I do not believe a bank, a whole building, and whole and complete program using archaic computers 60 years ago, could measure distance to the moon.

Furthermore, I have so many questions of things that do not make sense.

Consider this: When diving, one cannot push against the air to change direction. All movement in the air, in flight, basically, is propelled by the force against the board, the diver initiates.

If movement in space cannot be changed by pushing against air. How can it be changed pushing against less than air?

But wait. Air travel is a push against air, so it can be done. But wait. There is no air, we are told by those who theorize, in space.

Who has probed space and reported on the contents? Nobody?

Who has probed the oceans, lakes, rivers and reported on content? It is done, why never done in space?

All theories, again?

Reports and scientific evidence exists, however, for time travel, but not what so-called science and media report.

Reports and scientific evidence exists for weightlessness, but not what so-called science and media report.

Reports and scientific evidence exists for a flat earth, but not what so-called science and media report.

Reports and scientific evidence exists for free energy, but not what so-called science and media report.

Reports and scientific evidence exists for combustion engines operated by water, but not what so-called science and media report.

Reports and scientific evidence exists for combustion engines traveling 80 and more miles per gallon, but not what so-called science and media report. I drove one such car in the 1980s.

Reports and scientific explanations exist for aliens, alien aircraft, but not what so-called science and media report.

Reports and scientific evidence exists for everything in contradiction to assumed theories accepted “realities”, but not what so-called science and media report.

None of this is accomplished except by questioning the so-called reality around you.

I started this with no real direction except to question theory itself. But the biggest theory on my mind as of late, that applies to almost every person in the western world is, do covid-19 vaccines work?

My questions follow:

How is injecting mercury into one’s blood, good for that person?

How is injecting aluminum into an organism good for that organism?

How is injecting formaldehyde?

How does acid in vaccines not breakdown DNA of the bacteria?

How is graphene in covid-19 vaccines good for the body?

Please, take note that I did not question the necessity of stabilizing the vaccine solution. I care not for what purposes poisons are included in vaccines. So what if formaldehyde is used for stabilizing the solution? I am not concerned for the welfare safety and health of the solution. Have you thought about that?

I, we, you, anyone and everyone, could ask questions about everything. One could simply ask why is gravity, for example, still only a theory? Innumerable questions following that could come to the minds of innumerable numbers of people.

So, I ask you why you believe what you believe? I ask you of your beliefs are science or dogma?

I ask you, why have you not questioned what you think you know?



Originally published August 4th, 2021, as brainless religion.

It has been said innumerable times, in many ways that when religion is removed people replace it with another belief system. Welcome to fake community-ism and  social-programs-ism.

See the nun? Her habit represents voluntary service to god, freedom to practice religion of her choice: the freedom of choice.

See the hijab? Her head gear represents force to submit to political religion. Of course there are some who wear hijabs voluntarily, but the hijab cannot be removed by a change in choice as the nun can remove hers.

See the mask. The mask represents submission to anti-science, and ignorance.

Faucenstein and every single department of health propaganda agent, and political appointee and administrator, presented no references to science. Nothing. They did present, however, claims of adhering to science and reports of “following the science.” That, in my opinion sounds like a rote prayer.

Habit- commitment, removed at will.

Hijab- forced commitment, removed at peril.

Mask- dumbed-down force political science, worn at peril.

Government is brainless religion, based on only one science, political science. Government is religion with a god-the-father figure who knows all. Praise and reverence of all encompassing centralized government is indubitably religion, even more so than many faith-in-god religions. Democracy is the hijab, fake representation but force you had better not ignore.


Fabrications with inflated numbers and tricky emojis also do the trick, dem/libs think.

Love that graph of water and vapor and stuff and there, at the top of the page, a star for the Louisiana flood. Very scientific. I drew a graph. I had a star and some cool lines, and x and y projections. I also had a smiley face and a thumbs up emoji. That all made it very science-ish, right.

Do I sound dem/lib science-ish? Is that all it takes to impress loser libbies?

I made a graph and showed three circles of intersecting stuff, with the title: Global intersections against time frame compartments. Sounds cool, huh? Then I added some text below. “The consensus, according to this chart, shows temperatures are cooling globally”. Then I lied about what Pelosi said and added, “see, global trends show cooling”.

Because I want to sound science-ish, all I have to do is fool myself and my resultant, pretentious credibility should be convincing for others: after all, I am a good actor.

Acting, is everything.

Next lesson: how to pretend to be a doctor by carrying a scalpel and speaking medical language. Repeat these words: I looked at your charts and think we should try a new drug.

My fellow Americans, a scientist DOES science. A scientist does NOT sit in a room with a green wall behind him or her, and regurgitate “weather”. 

99 percent of global hoaxers are NOT in a laboratory.

They are NOT in a laboratory setting.

They are NOT doing studies.

They are NOT doing research.

They are NOT measuring anything.

They are NOT standing at the shoreline with a pen and clip board.

They are NOT at either pole taking temperatures. Nobody is at either pole except for military personnel. The poles are off-limits to civilians.

The 99 percent global hoaxers are NOT taking notes.

They are NOT doing experiments.

They are NOT looking or observing.

99 percent of global hoaxers are not even sitting in rooms with other weathermen (posing as scientists) deriving consensus on anything.

They are NOT doing science in any way, shape or fashion.

99 percent of global hoaxers do not know they are global hoaxers.

There is no community of global warming/climate change scientists. They are not science-ing anything and they are not compiling notes, taking notes, or even thinking of taking notes.

They have nothing to measure or take notes for or of, and they do NOT even have a reason, a cause and theory, or hypothesis to use a note to remind themselves to take notes. They do NOT have funding for anything. and so they get jobs and work at jobs.

There is no global warming/climates change science community. It is a fabrication that grows and shifts according to the propaganda needs of the moment. 

They are NOT sitting in committees convening or consensussing anything.

They are not going to conventions, doing online work. They are NOT trading notes because they have none. They are not thinking of trading notes they might have, if they ever did anything science-ish.

99 percent of global hoaxers are doing NOTHING even remotely related to science.

But here is the pièce de résistance: 99 percent, maybe 100 percent of global hoaxers are not, NAAAAAWT connecting observations to claims: empty or just fabricated. To describe the deep fraud of it all, “climate scientists” can be seen in many places, doing all kinds of observing but we never see one, NEVER see a single “climate” scientist showing results of the effects of the observed causes. We never see “climate scientists showing connections. We never see “climate scientists” showing the process itself of making a formula that connects a mountain of observations with a black-hole of effects, claimed or referenced. There is no science where there is not scientific method. Scientific method includes, hypothesis, procedures, variables, formulae, isolation of a variable for measure, pre-test and post test, control group or control element, and collation and interpretation of data, among a few other aspects.

Observation and claim, all there is to “climate science” is grotesquely inadequate in determining if an ant farts or the moon is made of cheese. Child-id morons: all those who pretend to present science, or think they are presenting “climate” anything.

They have degrees in fields related to acting, figure skating and entertainment, but they are not doing science. They are being used. They work at jobs and it is a popularity contest: NO SCIENCE, NOT A SHRED

Welcome to dem/lib “science”.


Whew! Heat wave after heat wave after heat wave. Just kidding.

This will go down as the hottest summer on record, somewhere, everywhere else except where you are, because where you are is the anomaly. Lots of anomalies, no heat waves.

2008, in SLC July alone, 15 days of temperatures over 100. Two, count them, 2, 1,2; two days only of temperatures over 100 all summer, this year. Wow, that sure is “hotter”

Whew this global hoaxing, I mean warming, sure is liberal.

Whew, this global hoaxing, I mean warming, sure is religion.

Whew. What are we going to do?

The air conditioning in my truck failed. It is a little warm and uncomfortable, but I have not bothered to fix it.

Unlike 10, 20, 30 years ago, evenings cool off. That sure adds to the heat “cooling effect”, I mean heat wave, I mean warm wave. Whew!

Unlike 10, 20, 30 years ago, it is NOT hot by 9:00 AM. Whew, that’s surely a heat wave, I mean warm wave.

In fact, there are days when it is still not hot at noon and does not look or feel like it is going to get hot at all. Pay attention to the day, dear readers. There are days when the real heat does not start until after noon. 

The fraud and deception, anomalies everywhere except everywhere, and the retardo-gooficus maximus utardius and the dippy doodle-itis liberals and ‘science” retards, claim it is warming, somewhere. Where? They still cannot show proof, anywhere, of warming.


They are dishonest, trying to extort compliance to their new religion: progressive bolshevism.


Originally published on, author Brent, 2/11/14

Let us address this idea of republicans being anti-science, as dem/lib liars continually propagate. Do we understand what propagate means? Propagate means to continually express, “information, ideas, or rumors deliberately spread widely to help or harm a person, movement, group, institution, nation, etc.”

We know propaganda with a negative context, to spread misinformation and lies.

When I write of the tyranny-wing, left, lying liberals, I mean they propagate lies. Daily I write with conscience, working to dispel myths and outright fabrications by democrats and liberals regarding many topics. Their favorites are that republicans and republic-minded citizens (including tea party representatives) are anti-science,  conspiracy theorists, anti-government and pro-religion (to an extreme they call the religious right).

Specifically, however, this article refers to the liberal lies about science.

Is political science a science? Is physiology, math, physics, chemistry,  sociology, psychology science? “Ology” is the “study of…”.

Of the approximate 40 million democrat voters (again less than half) how many are Mexicans that don’t read, write, or speak English? How smart are they, being the dregs of Mexico that couldn’t find work, or wouldn’t, and have sub-standard education? Are these the educated masses in the democrat electorate?

By removing 20 to 30 million Mexicans from the ranks of “educated” democrats, the democrats become a smaller minority. If we keep the Mexicans in the count then the democrat easily becomes the dumber group. If we use a scientific education as a mark of the depth of science in one party or the other, the dem/libs lose, hands down. If the republicans are richer (not true), and knowing that affluence sends people to college, then amongst the whites there are more rich republicans in colleges, studying and learning science.

Education produces more science oriented people, especially those that go to the universities.

How many Congressmen and women have degrees in political science? Are they all democrats?

Looking at a cross section of America, anywhere, in any city, those on the “wrong side of the tracks”, in the poor parts of town, are always less educated. From these people, democrats themselves, claim they draw the masses’ support. What percentage of people from the wrong side of the tracks have a scientific background at a college level? To study a science and work in that field one must be scientific. To accept the realities of modern education one must accept the scientific method of proving or dispelling a hypothesis. Theory about anything is just imagination never applied, but science, the application of proven theory, is evidence of pro-science. How many college graduates, of people that live scientific methodology, are democrats and how many are republicans?

The most significant variable in science is, again, not what liars and propaganda specialists in the dem/lib ranks call science, but what it actually is. To know the scientific methodology is to BE scientific. Democrats, typically less educated, do have troubles with science. Ask 100 democrat supporters (including the corresponding non-conversant Mexican), what scientific methodology is. How many will know? Ask 100 republican supporters and tell us how many know.

The basics to science is action/reaction, stimulus/response, deductive reason and cause and effect. These are all cores to science methodology, the foundation of science. How many democrat supporters are lost in translation? How many democrat supporters are lost because they abandoned their own country because they were too ignorant to find work? This drops the democrat supporter scientific base to well below that of republican base. I have not done any studies, and only heard of one recently that debunks the myth of democrats being more scientific and having higher eduction. All one has to do is travel the buses and trains and listen to people complain about things the government needs to do for them. Not many that have studied political science would not know characteristics of tyranny, communism, marxism/fascism and other political ideologies, that less educated bus travelers could never understand. Not many outside of any science could not see the cause and effect of spending beyond budgets. And this is the dem/lib base.

Science is the study of relationships and measure of change. Consider geometry. How many Mexicans, or whites, or christian dem/libs know what a hypotenuse is? It is no stretch of the imagination that the poorer education system in Mexico produces poorer students. And these people are part of the overall intelligence, or lack thereof, in the dem/lib, sub-intellect, propaganda community. Sure there are professors that are dem/libs. There are also republican professors. I am one.

One argument the dem/libs front is that religion is anti science because it believes the world was created in six days as opposed to obvious evidence of “evolution”. The word evolution isn’t even used anymore as a term to describe adaptation of species. There are a lot more christian democrats than republican christians. Less educated = less scientific = more subject to mythology and non-science. Ignorance = faith. There are more faithful dem/libs than republicans. To have faith, that is blind faith or ignorance in government, is no different than having faith in a religious politician. There is not a single republican christian I know, that believes the world was created in six real days. To most republican, if not all, christians, six days of creation, is a metaphor. I would estimate that 50 % of democrats do not know what a metaphor is.

Not many even believe it was created. But to the ignorant that know nothing of evolution, survival of the fittest, adaptation, etc., faith in anything is easier than telling your children you are an ignorant dimwit. The dem/lib mantra that ‘the guv’mint will take care of us’ is no different a faith in false deity than the judeo-christian faith in much more prominent beings that have survived through millennia.

The republican anti-science myth is easily propagated amongst the less educated, more susceptible to manipulation, lower middle class Americans, that fill the dem/lib electorate, in the ever dwindling minority.