YEARS OF DISCUSSION, ARGUING, INVESTIGATION AND SCIENCE QUESTIONING GLOBE THEORY AND NASA.

This was posted on effbee, facist-book, in response to globe theory propagators, a certain Roger Barnett, a fake profile of a fake person, I might add. This alone should give rise to a question as to why globe theory needs bots making arguments. I should further edit this and should also add visualizations. I will, one day.

Barn-bot claims, “Take note that the only variable ibetween these three images is the camera height. Perspective kills flerfspective”

Liar. Distance, acuity and distortion are variables. These are variables globetard goons try to ignore. Stop lying you lying luciferian goons.

Nobody, not a single globetard has ever once done an experiment to identify and isolate a variable that may be the cause of the appearance that the earth curves as one looks away, but it is speculative, while the horizon, a straight, flat plane, is not.

The difference is an irrefutable straight flat horizon.

With no other variables involved, compared with the speculation looking out to sea. It is like comparing an apple to a grain of sand, the irrefutably straight flat plane so bombastically destroys the curve speculation theory. But you might find that hard to believe until you inject logic and geometry.

Globe theory has not yet observed one thing to theorize the earth is a globe. They lie. They want you to jump into their dystopian flip-flop, to use you. Does your tax money go to me or nasa?

Furthermore, there are experiments done by curious people who tried to prove the earth was a globe, looking out to sea. They discovered the apparent curve is due to a number of variables, distortion and acuity being two, and the lying luciferian globetard goons know this.

For all you following this, these globetards lie and lie and lie. They use different tactics, the big one is to only present points that support their religion, often changing, or deceiving effects they claim are from causes they present. They also skip the parts where cause-and-effect should be connected. They deflect you from investigating methodology they do not have or use. It is all deception. It is faith, religious fervor, to ignore realities.

Did you all catch that? I earlier stated, ”may be the cause…”. This is the science in all of this “discussion”, my exercise of scientific methodology, an admission of a question, an unknown.

The question: why does it appear the earth curves when looking away out to sea, for example, but there is definitely no curve when looking at the greater distance, across the horizon? This would be science: science the filthy, lying luciferian slugs ignore and want you to ignore so you are an ignorant believer and subject in globetard/nasa religion.

It is simple geometry. Have you even heard a globetard use geometry? You might see some in drawings, models, cgi, but not a shred of data, however. Nothing real, lines on a page, and theorized numbers.

To wonder why the earth appears to drop, to curve downward, while it certainly does not appear to drop or curve downward across the horizon, would be true scientific methodology: something globetards try to hide from you. They know triangulation. They know it is evidence the earth is a straight, flat plane, and they try to keep it from you.

They know that if you extend your view to a point as far as you can clearly see, a wave that is 2 feet high, could block out scores of feet of a base of a building, or ship, beyond that point of view. You may think you are looking level, straight out to sea, but your focus is on the top of the water, and your line of sight is not parallel to the water because you focus on a point slightly higher than parallel, the top of the waves. You are looking down, with respect to the line from your feet to the point. No, maybe, yes? How could you know? Can you feel it? Do you just do what globetardia wants you to do, ignore geometry and believe their distractions from the reality of the situation?

It is impossible to discern a line of sight parallel to the line of reality from your feet out the same distance. You have no internal level that accurate, and you certainly have no capacity for discerning angle, perpendicular or parallel.

This study, experiment must be done with instrumentation, and it has been done. It has been proved the earth is a straight, flat plane(t).

Now the globetard goons will call on me to prove this has been done, show a reference, but that does not matter. That is how they deflect from the reality they have nothing.

I am not going to search or reference this. Simple logic, geometry, even theorized, shows many variables are not included or questioned in globe theory. In other words, there is no science, hence no conclusive proof or evidence, not even speculation, the earth is a globe.

I cannot prove globe theory negatives.

It is your responsibility to learn so you know for you.

Globetards have nothing equal or comparable. They have never proved a single theory, have never even submitted a shred of data, not a single measurement. Models and drawings of theorized measurements is not proof of anything, except deception.

Back to the geometry. You have no reference to prove or even surmise your line of sight is parallel to the water. There is no way you can do that, and the difference in the angle is so slight, it is imperceptible.

Do you understand? Looking at a point (the farthest visible wave), with a deviation of only 1 degree, then extended beyond that point another 18 miles, for example, hides a greater degree of the base of whatever you look at. How much? Well, get out your protractor, and find the angle.

The angle is nearly impossible to notice because you are looking at a point miles out to sea, and you feel stable, assuming your gaze is perpendicular to your stable stance, but you have no way of exacting 2 true perpendicular views, that could make a line of sight parallel to the water.

Instrumentation could make the exact level adjustment, and the globetard goons know this, and that is why they deflect, distract, and try to ignore completely all realities of science, scientific methodology, especially the primary motivator to ask,: observation.

Observe the straight, flat horizon.

Even with waves and atmospheric distortion on a body of water, the straight, flat horizon can be seen, but one can easily see, looking straight out, that distortion may be the variable that makes it appear the earth curves down. Globetardia has never addressed that, or anything.

Not a single one of these goons, even tries to refute that actual, irrefutable, undeniable, scientific reality, the straight, flat horizon. They know it is evidence that the earth is a straight, flat plane(t).

Liars must know the truths so they can avoid putting a truth into the intended victims’ minds: you.

How far out to sea can you discern clearly the crest of a wave, or swell of waves, five miles, two miles? However, one could see a ship 20 miles out to sea.

A wave, just one foot above a line parallel to line of sight, YOUR line of sight that you think is parallel to the surface, but isn’t, extended another 18 miles, hides at least 9 feet, theoretically.

Do you see all the garbage and fake science, and sophistry and deception, and attacks and insults and deflections and distractions the globetards use to hide this from you?

I was a surveyor. Line of sight does not curve.

You see, it is the flip-flop of reality the globetards want. They are evil representatives, agents of deeper evil.

You will give money and allegiance, risk your life even, for enemies you believe are your friends. It truly is luciferian. Even the symbolism of nasa is luciferian. Look up the dragon and panspermia.

The liars try to diminish the simplest and primary point of real science: observation, but it is all falling apart with proper education. You, YOU yourself, need to learn, not just goofle.

Study cause and effect. Study in detail scientific methodology. Find a Masters’ Thesis online and look at the elements of it. Compare it to globe theory and nasa. The first part,, the reason for speculation of theory, OBSERVATION itself, does not exist in glonbetardia/nasa. It is all lies.

Make sure you understand, those who outright lie to you, do not like you or respect you. They lie to you to use you.

Observe the straight, flat plane of the horizon that represents the straight, flat plane(t) earth. OBSERVE!

PART 3: “NASA OBSERVATORY RECORDS UNUSUAL ACTIVITY ON THE SUN.”

Now, finally, open the article, read and watch the animation.

The title of the article reads, “the sun just did something weird, and 3 other space stories you may have missed this week”.

The sun did something weird? How does nature that can only act natural, do something weird? How dumb. How is nature weird? How does the sun, totally untouched and unaffected by earth become weird?

What are the pre-test conditions and data, and post-test conditions, from which nasa makes comparisons to state the sun did something different or weird? Pre-test and post test, science, is absolutely missing from this goofy article. How utterly ridiculous can nasa luciferians get?

The subscript reads, “An oddball new exoplanet, small but significant steps toward the future of spaceflight and a mystery in the Kuiper Belt.”

“Oddball”? Wow, that is so scientific it is scary. What a stupid thing to write. How does a thing without feet step? What stupid clichés can only follow stupid “people”,

A “new exoplanet”? A new planet discovered? “Exo”, as in external? There can only be an “exo” if there is an “endo”, or internal. And what determines ”exo” and “endo”? No comparators, no examples, no parameters or definitions, just stupid words and pieces tossed about to confuse and create education chaos. This is bloody, evil deception.

See how the luciferian liars toss in terms and words that mean nothing so they can sound smart and expert, so they can lie with impunity and control you first with fear and then LAW that follows your response to fear they create.

How much farther from earth than the sun, is this theorized planet?

If all nasa can provide is an animated depiction of the moon from earth, while the sun is even more out of the realm of visual possibility, then a new planet, even more distant than that, cannot be seen or discovered.

How utterly science-retarded can nasa get?

If the sun is impossible to see because the moon is impossible to see, then some crazy, theorized, fabricated, imagined new “exoplanet”, farther away, is absolutely impossible, and absolutely impossible to film or photograph.

The subscript reads, “An oddball new exoplanet… in the Kuiper Belt.”

There is no Kuiper belt because there is no measurement or substantiated distance. There is no relationship of these heavenly bodies therefore they do not exist. The distance to the sun is theorized to be 400 times the distance of the moon from earth, but the distance of moon from earth is not calculated so none of what follows, the whole of globe theory and nasa, is not substantiated and does not exist.

Sure, go ahead, build a house on a pretend foundation, and you don’t have a house, an attic, a garage. You don’t have walls, windows, doors and heat. It is impossible to build something on nothing.

Nasa and globe theory is all so much building on nothing. Show us the calculation of the distance of earth to moon. From that, maybe, one could extrapolate information, a measurement or two, to plug into an equation to calculate something from that foundation. Nothing!

I can line up 3 yard sticks, then four yardsticks at a right angle to the three, and then aim five yardsticks from the end of the three yard sticks to the end of the four yard sticks and create a right angle triangle. This is known as a 3, 4, 5 right triangle. It can be used to create a right angle for building something. You can see it. You can watch the creation of it and how it works. You can see the application of it in making a 90 degree angle out of measurements that can only come together in one way.

There is absolutely nothing of the sort, and less in partiality that lends credibility to anything luciferian nasa fabricates. Show us the one point fixed in space, not “space”, from which other variables are derived, measured and used to calculate anything? Nasa still does not have definitive distance of the end of the atmosphere, or beginning of “space” so the distance of earth to moon is impossibly known.

But, don’t believe me. Look at the animation. Look at the words of the article itself, written, fabricated by science-retard, sam matthews.

These yahoo”NEWS” writers are so dishonest and evil, they do not deserve capitalized names, being liars and devils that deserve no human recognition for their crimes against truth, reality, and humanity.

PART 2: “NASA OBSERVATORY RECORDS UNUSUAL ACTIVITY ON THE SUN.”

PART 2

This “technology” claim that the sun is visible, is as luciferian and completely evil, as anything nasa fabricates.

Find yourself the best camera and see how far it “sees” accurately. Get a telescope and see how far on land it “sees”. And you believe your telescope “sees” planets millions and billions of miles away? How is the light from a planet of such vast distance not completely dissipated?

It is unbelievably arrogant and science-retarded to think light is not dissipated over such vast distances. Even at 93 thousand miles, light is totally dissipated. 930 miles, 93 miles.

They claim they are looking at stars and other heavenly bodies that are millions and billions of miles away. How do they know? How, without a single calculation do they “know” the objects they see are not 200 miles away? They don’t.

Don’t ask why. Evil lies, must lie, and must flip-flop everything, for control.

Their lies are based on their fundamental lies.

Find the world’s most effective telescope, and goofle how far it sees effectively? 93 million miles? Impossible!

The Hubble telescope does not boast it can see the moon, much less the sun. If the Hubble cannot get actual photographs of the moon, it does not see it, and we know it does not see the moon because there exists no photos, only images, composites, drawings and CGI animations and depictions. They just said that.

Go and look for yourselves. when they can only animate and depict, it is an admission that they have no videos or photos of the moon.

Find the specifications of the Hubble telescope and report here.

Can any of the “space” theory goons show us the equation and numbers, with angle for triangulation, that determines the distance any telescope can clearly “see”?

NOPE!

Imagine a telescope can see 1,000 miles. How far is it theorized that “space” begins? Estimates are 300 to 330 miles high is where “space” begins.

Why do telescopes not film “space” walks, satellites, “space” craft?

Film, not CGI; not mystery locations in space where a camera floats and takes photos; film does not exist because the tasks are impossible, and nasa admits it with fake everything.

Why are there no actual videos of a rocket lifting off, and being traced into “space”?

How far away is 93 million miles compared to 300 miles? If that is the best telescope technology can do, and I speculate, having seen no claims of visual contact from any telescope, then it is impossible given current technology, that anything can “see” the surface of the sun.

To see the surface of the sun clearly, one would need to build a telescope that has 93,000 times the resolution of the strongest telescope, based on visual acuity of 1,000 miles. Can these telescopes see across the planet 1,000 miles? Is it not curious that a telescope with apparent accuracy to see 93 million miles does not use that acuity to look across the horizon or into “space” to film satellites and rockets?

You see they, nasa et al, have you convinced that the planets they see in the heavens are millions and billions of miles, or light years away. How does the light from a star billions of light years away not dissipate?

But wait, estimates of moon and sun distances are based on prior estimates, based on nothing, based on gross inadequacies to guess if something is 200 or 200 million miles away. It is all lies. Nobody knows. Nobody has done a calculation. Nobody has a number to inject into an equation.

Telescopes claim they can look into the heavens and see planets at certain theorized distances. There was never a beginning point as to how far these heavenly bodies are so no comparisons can be made with references points that do not exist.

So, “scientists” might estimate the distance of the sun using completely erroneous estimates based on theorized distances of stars or moon. The stars might be only hundreds of miles away, reflections of things in the firmament.

Yes, it is possible there is a firmament, and no such fantasy as “space”. NASA has not filmed or photographed “space”.

If I am in my house, and wonder how cold it is outside, I look out the window and make observations. If I execute a pre-test and see water, and check an hour later to see the same water is freezing, I can theorize the temperature is below freezing. That is a start, observation. There is no starting observable point to nasa fabrications, lies and quackery.

There is no start to “space”; no pre-test; no science.

If I look up and see a star, I wonder what it is and how far away it is. If I have no means to measure the distance of that star, any guess, made popular by repetition, is an imagined guess at best. From that guess used as a benchmark for other distances, the 100% margin of error is multiplied.

I can estimate the sun must surely be closer than the stars, because it is bigger, or appears to be bigger, and that is all. I can theorize and nothing more. That is all NASA has, theory based on theory based on anti-science, anti-trigonometry, imagination. Show us one measurement NASA has ever made to back their guesses.

Theory based on theory based on imagination and fabrication could provide a margin of error of thousands or millions percent. No distance of any heavenly body has ever been calculated.

In reality, there is no proof that the strongest telescope “sees” farther than 300 to 330 miles, so the required magnification of the best current visual is actually 310,000 times more than we have.

I do not believe, in the least that nasa can see 1,000 miles much less 9,300 times that distance. You can believe that if you decide to believe the objects you see in the sky are the distances NASA and globe-theory imagine and perpetually repeat.

The sun must be 93 million miles away because we know the moon is 238,000 miles away, but the moon might only be 100 miles away. Nobody knows because nobody can produce an equation to measure that distance, and nobody has a single shred of data.

For all “science” knows the moon might be farther away, and bigger.

Go ahead, believe their claims and distances. Worst, believe liars are not lying to you that they know these things when they have absolutely nothing but planned deception to make you think something is known: that they are smarter than you.

Can you find information that shows how nasa technology does it? Can you find an actual photo of the moon that is not an image, a composite, a representation, drawing, CGI for animated depiction? How do you expect then, to find an actual photo of the surface of the sun? Again, can you explain, show, or prove the distance in any equation” Or, can you provide a reference to an equation measurement, or reference point in space or on earth from which extrapolations of distances can be calculated?

That image, a piece of a “footage” is a fabrication, a lie. Even nasa states it is an image and not a photo.

DO YOU NOT SEE? DAILY PROPAGANDA, WEATHER, FIREARMS, AND FAKE OIL PRICE INCREASES. LIES OF THE ILLICIT, ILLEGAL, U.S. GOVERNMENT DEMOCRACY.

Do you not see?

Illegals are invited in to our country: “divido et impero”: divide and control.

The “NEWS” today, of the shootings in Chicago and Ohio were erroneously reported.

The goons, including a police chief, reported one attack was by a high-powered rifle. There is no such thing.

It is possible the bullets were high powered, longer casings hence more gunpowder.

In Salt Lake City, Fox 13 weather “NEWS”, that slug demon yauney reports lies every day.

Today, July 5th 2022, the bolshevik agent of misinformation reported that we got off to a normal start of the day, and to expect a high of 96. Then he stated that a 96 degree high is a little above average.

That, “…average…”, is probably the only true weather report that dimwit has ever reported.

I mean true report in that he reported correctly using a word that better represents measuring, collecting data, a real part of scientific methodology, “average”.

My guess is that the average daily high for July 4th is higher than that. For the last 15 years daily highs, for every day of the year, have been dropping.

At 7:00 AM the weather report on my phone showed 73 degrees. My three thermometers showed 68, 68, and 70 degrees.

They are lying to us about everything. If they can get us to believe it is hotter than it actually is, then they have us believing it is hotter than it has been and thus we are convinced of their narratives that climate change, planet warming, is valid. If they can convince you that th planet is heating up then they have you accepting restrictions of water, energy, food, and you become dependent, slaves.

A report of a high of 96, “…a little bit above average for this time of year…”, means we will not hit 96, but tomorrow it will be reported that today was a scorcher. This has been going on for years.

What a retard, kerry cronk, “looks like oil prices will remain high because of global instability.”

Is the so-called globe teetering on its axis?

The globe, the planet, is always unstable.

There is always conflict somewhere.

The weather reporters report politics?

The correlation of high gasoline, and all energy fuel prices increased as biden usurped control over America, specifically our economy. This is unmistakeable.

The correlation of illegal and illicit biden dictates to high gasoline and food prices is irrefutable.

It was our economy. It was our food production economy. It was our free market delivery industry usurped, by dementocrati/bolshevik commandeering. They colluded and usurped our representative republic and our economy.

Those bastard biden bolsheviks offered help and weak minds accepted, and are now controlled and marked for elimination.

One thing tyranny hates is its own association with inferior beings that eliminate and exploit other inferior beings.

Tyranny despises weaklings that turn on their own, whether for money or out of fear of the ruling class. The tyranny collusion sees treasonous puppets as detestable rabble that need to be cleansed from the elitists’ dementocrat/bolsheviks’ world.

It is not theirs, but that is what they think.

As I sit and type the faux weather goons, the morons, the self-aggrandizing dummies, literally dumb and dumber, are telling us how to get better mileage out of vehicles.

How twisted and deranged to think their silly guessing to save us one or two percent is a considerable effect compared with the well over 200 percent increase in costs due to seizure of our economy, and the “NEWS” goons are part of the misinformation campaign to mislead the masses to accept suffering and slavery.

How about someone release the patents of vehicles that get 80 miles per gallon and better?

Patents exist by the thousands. Patents and technology exists to split water at “carburetion” into useable hydrogen.

It is all shut down by the fascist U.S. government (not our government of the republic), working with “energy” corporations.

Spraying gasoline in a liquid form into a carburetor or injector system wastes fuel.

To spray actual gasoline fumes, gasoline in a gaseous form, makes the gasoline much more combustible, and efficient.

As I have said, many times in many articles, I was a witness to a vehicle that got 80 miles to the gallon of gasoline, and also a witness to two men in black suits threatening the patent owner to sell his patent. Thousands…..

CRITICAL RACE THEORY: ONE THEORY COMPARED WITH OTHER THEORIES, AND GIVEN A FAIR SHARE OF INSTRUCTION AS OTHER THEORIES.

Bill Maher, moments of cognizance.

Surely he will argue that point. Call it my opinion. I have heard Bill Maher lie and lie.

However, today I write, report, that Bill Maher, a proponent of the left-wing bolshevik rhetoric, not necessarily true, made some keen observations one would not expect from dem/lib movements, particularly, the dumbing down of Americans through a dissembled, subjugated de-education system.

Bill Maher referred to and played a ticktock video clip of questions asked of Americans. “What is the biggest city in the world?”, is one such question.

The answers were, Asia, Europe, Brazil, and others, maybe some actually citing a city.

Maher’s words following are an expose that even the bolshevik-left realizes their dismantling and destruction of real education is a reality.

Maher states: “…so you tell me, if a country is only as strong as its people what can the future possibly hold for a population this moronic, being a full grown adult and thinking a human could walk on the sun? Or that the biggest city in the world as Asia. This country simply has no education standards anymore. They will let you out of a public high school and give you a diploma and you don’t actually have to know anything, which used to be the mission of schools, knowing things.”

Maher was referring to Critical Race Theory, as opposed to actual education of “…knowing things”, and he continued that our children do not know anything.

Controlling ignorant populations is always a construct of left-wing, boshevik/dementocrat tyranny, and Maher has noticed.

I have a number of simple questions, for many issues, that left-wing dementocrat, bolshevik drones constantly refuse to answer, address, or even allow to be discussed. Hence we see ruling, un-representative governing bodies, such as education boards, having parents removed from the lives of their own children.

Why is a theory taught in schools as if it were the ultimate issue, the only theory and irrefutable truth? Why is Critical Race Theory taught, imposed, lived, and forced upon our children when it is only a theory? What opposing, or related theories should have equal representation and time as CRT?

I have been investigating heliocentric (globe) theory versus flat, plane(t) earth for a number of years now. I have been kicked off Facebook numerous times, suspended, for arguing, fighting, delivering the same tone and vocabulary as those with whom I fight, while they are not suspended.

I have a question that seems to draw the ire of all heliocentric model believers: If the earth is a globe, why do photos show a flat horizon at any shore of a large body of water?

To explain this in geometric terms, if one claims he or she can see a curve looking out to sea, as a ship, for example, moving away from shore, appears to roll over the curve of the earth and “sink” why is this same curve not seen looking across that same view, in fact, where the distance is greater?

If we, mankind, has been into space, why are there no photos of earth from space?

You might well argue that there are. Might I point out that there are CGIs, models, composites, drawings, art and much related but not one single photo.

In fact, the dearth of photos of earth from space is starkly accentuated when we consider the latest jaunt into “space” by bozo-bezos an William Shatner.

Do not forget that Shatner is an actor, and acts unreal situations.

In tha fall of 2021, Bozo-bezos and Shatner took a rocket flight into “space”.

Apparently the whole event lasted 11 minutes, and the report is that the, “The rocket launched from Blue Origin’s private facility in West Texas, reaching above 100 kilometers (or more than 340,000 feet altitude) before returning to Earth safely a few minutes later.”

How did it return? Was it in space? Did it actually go into “space”, and turn around and come back?

How does propulsion push against something that isn’t there, the void of “space”, to change direction so it can return?

That is just the beginning of questions regarding a fake flight into “space”, or a flight into fake space.

Two minutes, with all the new technology of today, is all they could manage?

How many seconds of weightlessness did they experience? Weightlessness can be experienced in a jet at any altitude. We call it falling. The same effect can be felt when an elevator drops.

Why no photos?

With all the new technology, advances in rocketry, and apparent photos of earth in 1969, why could these goons not take one photo of earth from space, even with a fish-eye lens? Did they not actually go into “space”?

These are just questions from my immediate thoughts, drawn from recent internet “discussions”, I wonder about these theories. I am certain I will be adding to this list of queries.

Do not forget that the heliocentric model is a theory and at best a model. With perfect lack of photos of earth from “space”, one must remember that the globe earth is a theory and only a theory,

Do not forget that the plane(t) earth as a flat, straight plane is also a theory but not taught or given a 1% effort as the theory of earth as a globe;

Critical race as a theory is given so much time and instruction it is more than a subject in. School. It has actually been instituted as societal fabric: a part of reality that is only theory.

One should be astounded at how recent and oppressive CRT is; how CRT is so recently instituted and augmented, as compared with other theories.: theories that are so ignored they are not even mentioned.

There are in existence theories in opposition to CRTtheory but CR theory has not been questioned in the least. Not even questioned is the reality that CR theory is only theory and opinion.

How about we teach the Bill of Rights and discourses by Thomas Jefferson, Abraham Lincoln, George Washington, all who opined their theories, that proved to be much more than theory? What theories could these possibly be, you ask. Have you read your history? From where does the Bill of Rights originate? What?

The Bill of Rights, you say, is not a theory that challenges CR theory. How would you know if you have not studied, looked, maybe read one page from the public notices that contributed to the Bill of Rights?

Public notices, you ask? The Federalist Papers is a collection of letters written to colonials at the time of the War of Independence, published throughout the colonies. Public discourse, as opposed to demented CR theory hiding from parents’ purview, was popular in those years: very PUBLIC, theorized and discussed at the founding of America.

Read and see for yourselves if the individual rights, described as coming from god, challenge CR theory.

To be fair to all theories, how about the de-eduction system spend a few moments every day teaching possible challenges to CR theory? How about an equal dispensation of time for each theory be allotted asa balanced curriculum? Who wants an imbalanced curriculum?

Would it be possible to return to a class of basic civics and critical ice theory be given a proper place, a theory with as much given it as other theories? Wait, what a basic civics class?

Do you realize students in America were taught basic civics? What happened, where did civics lessons go? The deranged bolshevik dementocrats eliminated civil, and math, and geometry, and biology, and health.

Did you not know this? When the demented education boards teach that 2 plus 2 can equal five, you must realize math is gone.

Please, take note that I purposely identify and accentuate that this CRT is identified by the authors themselves as theory. Being a theory it deserves much much less attention than things such as, why can people not walk on the sun and what are the big cities of the world?

FAKE GLOBE-EARTH THEORY PROFILE: GREG DAVIS’ COMMENT AND MY REPLY

Greg Davis: “you’re not a scientist. I’ve already shut you down effortlessly. You’re just a lonely guy looking to feel important. I know your type very well. I study it. If you actually want to talk about something real, our deal still stands. I will reward you with information on one point, and a fun sticker, for every direct question you engage on-topic with a direct answer. If you’re not up for that, or simply cannot, then don’t bother speaking again. This is a discussion forum, designed to facilitate intelligent conversation about specific topics relating to the shape of the earth. It’s not a free-for-all to perpetuate insults and hate by miserable cockroaches. That is all”

My reply:

A legend in your own mind. Shut me down, with what, CGI and drawings? How would you know I am not a scientist when you do not know the first thing about experimentation, scientific methodology, or even the language of science? You are morally and cause-and-effect backward.

How do you presume to know I am a lonely guy? Who the hell do you think you are? You trailer-trash loser presumptuous lying piece of rat crap.

You have nothing, not even a real profile. What did you provide that shut me down? Make a point, loser! How many laboratory experiments have you engineered and conducted? You can’t even speak science terminology you are so uselessly uneducated. Well, I have a pic of your profile and will publish it with your stupid words and my reply. Not even sure what loser point you think you made, but the fundamentals escape your limited lying mind. There is no science when there is no data, no observaion, and without an actual photo there is no beginning of science for globe-theory.

Globe-theory cannot even be called that until an observation is made, and there is nothing, and you know it you lying treasonous bolshevik bastard.

Can you not wrap your little mind around that reality, or are you that sick and twisted to lie to such sick extent? Wait for it, wait for it: liberalnewsreview.com

FAKE GLOBE-EARTH THEORY PROFILE: ROGER BARNETT COMMENT AND MY REPLY, 1/10/22

Barnett: “The earth’s shape is not a theory. it’s been known for millenia and has been quantified to closer and closer tolerances as time and scientific advances progress. FE? Bwahaa…. It’s nonsensical drivel..or dribble for those that foam it out their mouthes.”

Scores and scores of fake profiles all doing nothing but post fake-science, amazingly all in favor of globe-theory earth. Something is surely going on that brings so many ignorant goons together to propagate so many, and all the same, lies.

My Reply:

Known by whom? What tolerances? Barnett has no idea, surely regurgitating spew from his/her/its master handler. Again, Roger, tell us, what tolerances? What is the margin of error? Tell us what scientific progress it is that uses CGI and drawings to make a fake photo of earth, when nobody has ever been “in space”? You lying pos. Known by whom, Aristotle, Heracles, Herodotus, Jason and the Argonauts, Dustin the wind? What a loser! Nobody has known for millennia. What a sewage-sucking fraud! It is that simple.

For all reading this, by many things bolshevik-dick wrote, you can surely see how ignorant and un-scientific everything of dick-roger’s comment is. But, especially and specifically obvious is this: how does one “quantify” something that is not a quantity?

Known for millennia? Who are you trying to fool? Even the dumbest of dumb, you anti-science, scientific methodology retards cannot be so stupid to totally ignore reality AND history. Are you really so stupid and grotesquely, fat, ugly and lying!

Your stupid pretense (millennia) is not only a stretch of gross magnitude, considering the Bible has been around for millennia, but even you, a real pseudo-person cannot be that stupid to ignore the reality that globe-theory is a theory. Do you realize that when someone says a word they mean it, like theory means theory?

But it is okay. I get where you are coming from and I have a picture of your “profile” and will post it to my site, with my reply, a shit-kicking for you for all to see, and beyond so others can see just how fake and politically motivated, sub-human you filthy bolshevik NASA agents are. You lie like a rat you filthy rotten agent provocateur.

EXISTENTIAL CHINESE SUPERSONIC MISSILE PROVIDES OPPORTUNITY FOR CLARIFICATION OF SCIENTIFIC METHODOLOGY

“China has a missile that was previously thought impossible”

Yes, China has a missile nobody thought could be created, but there is evidence it can exist; that it could have been created. This evidence is observation that other missiles exist and technology applied and working in other areas has a potential to be applied to create supersonic missile technology.

This is the first phase of scientific methodology: observation.

The theory of flying bombs is more than just theory. “Flying” bombs exist. We know it. In science terminology, we call this observation. Predicting, another phase of science, is extending already observed realities using existing technology, not theory. This makes an extension of known observations possible and believable.

This extension is not possible where there is no observation such as fake disciplines of climate changeling and “space” travel/globe-theory.

Again, theory based on theory is bad theory and can predict absolutely nothing except silly imagination.

This fertilization of imagination-based theory is the core of modeling in “science” today, particularly climate changeling and globe-earth theory and “space” travel/globe-theory.

If all one can produce is unobservable imagination of modeling and fake theory based on unsubstantiated theory, then one has nothing. When theory is based on theory, there is no evidence from which a reality can be extrapolated. This is climate changeling today, and globe-eath/space speculation.

All one need to do, to observe the unobservable climate-changeling and “space travel/globe-theory theories, is to pay attention to the words of those who promote: “models”.

Re: “Save the Planet”, refused posting by Craigslist, 8/10/18

Re: “Save the Planet”

From whom or what does the planet need saving? Who says so, and why?

The whole global warming issue is a fabrication, a big lie intended to make you, dear, trusting reader, think there is something wrong with mankind, and nothing wrong with authoritarian rule by the most dangerous minority that has ever existed: the political class.

“They are destroying the great forest overseas…”

Who is “They”? Nobody identified, again, as usual, just an indiscriminate ghost, like all bogey-men the dem/lib/ progressive bolsheviks create from fear they plant in your mind.

Which forest? No description; nothing clearly identified, again? Is this another dem/lib fabrication; another bogey-man?

Are you afraid, dear fellow Americans? Did the heading capture your attention? Great, an emotional manipulation, by…somebody who cannot be specific, because he/she/it has nothing to be specific about. Is this another fabricated bogey-man by a nothing promoter to push a political agenda for a non-existent problem?

Again, which forest? None? Correct.

Again, who is “They”, nobody, again, as usual? Correct.

Add this to the manipulative title with absolutely no backing or reality, another question avoided by “writer”. I ask, who says so, and who presumes to speak with authority, without identifying him/her/itself or establishing some credibility? Who would be so stupid to try to effect a change in others without a shred of credibility or science?

Do you understand the point? It is easy to toss around emotionally worded titles and headlines to sneak fabrications with no backing or references, or real names, past trusting readers; a series of exaggerations that continually twists and distorts and expands to make totally unreal claims.

It is done for reason. It is done to hide the truth and reality of the opposite. It is a purposeful deflection and an even more purposeful and insidious attempt to turn a reader to trust the lies and source of lies, while distancing the reader from truth and reality.

Who would do such a devilish thing? Only someone with a hidden agenda, that is willing to sacrifice you and all you have, is capable of that level of hate for another

To make it all so much worse, a fake credibility, not even attempted to be established, is replaced by a manipulative emotional trigger propagated for so long, without credibility, again, and repeated ad nauseum, it has a pretense of reality that misleads readers to make wrong choices.

One wrong choice the general population is manipulated to constantly make is to support the wrong people: enemies, like those who use un-substantiated and un-supported, emotional claims.