DAILY, SUB-STANDARD YAHOO”NEWS” PROPAGANDA: “Greenland hit with ‘unusually extensive’ melting of ice sheet, boosting sea levels scientists say.”

July 24th, 2022, I saw the yahoo”NEWS” report and knew immediately it was lies, fraud, massive, if not total, fabrication.

As usual, I ask for your forgiveness as I have not put much effort into editing this article. I have many battles to fight, including making a living.

So, I have not read it but will and will not be surprised, when I do read it, while I write this article. We will critique it together.

The headline reads, “Greenland hit with ‘unusually extensive’ melting of ice sheet, boosting sea levels scientists say.”

Sure. What scientists? Who was there? I am already laughing.

A photograph from an aircraft is not science.

I was suspended from facebook over a month ago for exposing a series of gobbledegoop science articles written by NOAA. Okay, maybe I presume they were written by NOAA. NOAA published them on their site.

I will get back to that NOAA article after this.

The first thing one should notice is that “unusually extensive” is not quoted, rather in between apostrophes.

So, it is not quoted, not stated.

The “report” begins with conditional, fraudulent statements.

Who is Saleen Martin?

Without reading a single line of the article yet, we know he or she will be propagating misinformation. I know it because I have critiqued numerous yahoo”NEWS” articles and found every single one of them to be litanies of lies and fabrications.

I know it, you will need to determine that as we go.

The first sentence reads, “It’s getting hotter in Greenland…” It is summer. We should hope it is getting hotter in Greenland.

Greenland is still white, not green, like it was hundreds of years ago when it was warmer.

The full sentence reads, It’s getting hotter in Greenland and last weekend temperatures rose enough to cause 18 billion tons of the country’s ice sheet to melt over three days.”

Who measured that? How was it measured and how much was lost in previous years over same periods or similar periods?

You see, measuring and comparing would be science.

Let us see together if USA Today writers give us science or not.

Before, I read any further, however, how much is 18 billion tons of ice? What is the volume and how did the measurement take place?

How much ice melts in a summer?

How does “tons” equate to a different measurement, elevation of water in inches, for example? Will saleen explain this? That would be scientific.

In one year could it be possible that a trillion tons of ice melts? 18 billion tons, then, would be 0.18 percent, hardly a three day massive amount, but I speculate. Let us see if the “writer” puts 18 billion tons into perspective for us. That would be science, comparison, measuring change.

What is the volume of 18 billion tons of ice? Why is that not reported?

You see, I have not even read beyond the headline and first sentence/paragraph, and already I am searching for aspects of scientific methodology. Are you?

Water is more dense than ice.

Water weighs 62.3 pounds per cubic foot.

Ice weighs 57.2 pounds per cubic foot.

How much of that ice, that does not appear anywhere, is actually snow? Does it matter? Snow weighs in between 3.12 pounds per cubic foot to heavy wet snow at 12.5 pounds per cubic foot. Did any of these “scientists” or “writers” measure, or even think about that variable?

I wonder if “writer” saleen knows any of this.

One ton of ice would be 2,000 pounds, or 34.97 cubic feet.

Imagine a ditch 34.97 feet long, one foot wide and one foot high. That is the volume of one ton of ice.

Multiply that by 18 billion.

18 billion tons of ice is equivalent to 36 trillion pounds.

36 trillion pounds divided by 57.2 (pounds per cubic feet) gives us cubic feet. The result is 629.37 billion cubic feet of ice. One foot deep, or 629.37 cubic feet divided by one foot results in 629.37 billion square feet.

There are 27,878,400 square feet per square mile.

Converted to square miles, or 629,370,000,000 square feet divided by 27,878,400 gives us 22,575.54 square miles.

Square miles of Greenland 2,166,086.

So one foot deep, 2,166,086 divided by 22,575,000 square miles, the three day melt of one foot deep ice equals .0104, or one percent.

In three days, 1% of the total area of greenland, one foot deep melted. Is this a lot? No. This does not happen in warmer climates.

Is it very little in comparison? You might ask, in comparison to what? Wouldn’t that be something the “scientists” and “writers” provide to show that there is more melt than usual? Sure, but they do not think in terms of science or anything related to science, obviously.

Nobody knows. I did a simple calculation. I now know something more regarding this so-called ice melt than all who have “contributed” to this article. I have added more reality to this article than all at USA Today and every so-called scientist that did not contribute a single measurement, or methodology of measuring.

How much ice was added to Antarctica and all southern climes over the same period? Was it ice or snow? How much of that pretentious, unsubstantiated amount of 18 billion tons, was actually snow?

The earth’s total ocean area is 140 million square miles.

If it was all ice that melted, then going back to our calculation, we have 22,575 square miles of water one foot deep spread over a total 140,000,000 miles of ocean area (the volume of water from ice would actually be less than 22,575 square miles). This equals 0.00016125 foot deep covering the oceans.

Converted to inches we have 0.001935 inches spread over the whole surface area of the oceans of the world. This is less than 1/3 of a 1/6th of an inch: about 1/50 of an inch. NOTHING!

Again, the gobbledegoop scientists will argue that it is a lot when you consider it happens all through the summer, but it does not happen at that rate. Isn’t that the crux of the article, that due to unusual melt more than usual volumes of ice have melted. But the goons state none of that because they are not scientific minded.

They toss out and ignore variables that do not support their empty claims.

They really have nothing of nothing and admit it in their silly claims and fear-mongering.

Are you afraid of that sudden rise in ocean levels of 1/3 of a 1/16 of an inch. Wow, like Al Gore, I can see the fish flopping in the streets of Florida cities, like it happened 15 years ago. Wait! Nothing of the sort happened.

And of course referring to another “study” the gobbledegoop scientists made, regarding one Florida Island (see my articles in CLIMATE CHANGE/GLOBAL WARMING), in which the sea level around that island in the chain experienced rising water levels while all others did not. Oops, they forgot that reality.

Drastic, unusual, they claim, the ocean rose, 1/3 of a 1/16 of an inch in three days. WOW!

But, did it? If it is so hot then that rise in ocean water level was surely swallowed up by increased vaporization. OMG, the goons forgot about that too. And where did that vaporization drift? Did it eventually, following jet streams and natural air flow over the earth, find its way to Antarctica, where it was dropped as snow?

Do you see how narrow-minded and un-scientific these fabrications are, and how dishonest and full of hate the “scientists” and “writers”  must be to lie so egregiously to YOU?

And due to freezing in southern climes the oceans level dropped a full 1/16th of an inch. No? Who knows” The goons of yahoo”NEWS”, USA Today and NOAA, and all the fake scientists certainly do not know. They do not know enough to even think about significant variables.

And I have only read the headline and first paragraph/sentence.

How many days, or how many three day time frames does the very very short summer in Greenland produce, 20, maybe?

Okay, so now I read the rest of the article, and try not to laugh at the childish, sub-intelligent fabrications the science-retards try to foist on the ignorant masses. Do these “people” get paid to be such rat-brained liars?

The article is totally void of variables or anything science-ish, to be considered science. This sub-intelligent report fools you?

So, three days of melting in greenland, according to…nothing… produces, at most (excluding the “snow variable”, and other variables) less than 1/50th of an inch increase in ocean levels. That’s it.

I skimmed the rest of the article. I saw a few names and researched them. The “writer” refers to “scientists” but no science.

The profiles of so-called climate scientists is void of reality. The “lists” of accomplishments read like a dating site profile….and Ted Scambos likes long walks on the beach and fluffy kittens.

The unusually extensive fabrications, fake accomplishments and lack of references to experiments and study data, exposes the fraud of all climate changeling global hoaxing.

Read and research for yourself.

Start with two things: 1) do not waste your time finding a definition of scientific methodology. Study it, learn it and apply it. 2) pick a topic and add “Masters Thesis” to it, and do an online search to find a real study or experiment for comparison, you know, science.

Do not remain ignorant. Get off your ass and learn reality.

You actually already apply the scientific methodology in your life, but then you let the gobbledegoop scientists of nothing, convince you that fairy tales do come true, as long as they follow the political narratives that keep you ignorant.

Have you ever eaten something and hated the taste, and then some time later avoided that food? Cause-and-effect, science at work. Maybe you can think back and remember how well you feel after eating that broccoli. Now you have an effect added to one variable, taste), and you make a decision based on one variable and the ffect. You may deduce that you do not like the taste of broccoli but because of the healthy return it seemed to provide, you decide to change and eat broccoli. That is study of change and adaptation: science.

Read and learn, and be free.

SURVIVING THE FAKE SCIENCE OF WEATHER REPORTING, JUNE 15TH, 2022.

Did that moron yauney, weather “reporter” in Salt Lake City for Faux 13, say temperatures are”…definitely on the cool side.”? Does that bolshevik puppet mean below average, way below average, way way, waaaaay below average? Does that lying dummy know what average means? Does he know what “normal” means and how it is not quite, at all, in the least a measure of weather or anything even remotely related to science? Does that moron realize he speaks in bolshevik fake-science, manipulating and conditioning language that the masses cannot follow?

Yauney knows he is a lying piece of rat crap. All of them know and they lie anyway.

Cool side? Daily average temperatures are 20 degrees below average and daily average highs are 10 degrees below average daily high temperatures. Yauney and Cronk and the bolshevik/banker controlled “NEWS” outlets; all while the cause-and-effect, bolshevik-puppet retards lie.

At 6:00 AM today, June 15th 2022, it was 43 degrees. That is 20 degrees below average highs at this time of day. 20 degrees!

Everything is a flip-flop of reality. The temperatures are cooling but weak minds have no capacity for anomalies?

An idiot told Utahns to reduce electrical consumption til they get things back to normal. There is no normal. Normal does not exist in the science realm or realm of anything substantial.

“Normal” is nothing.

What is the average daily electricity consumption and demand? What is the rate today, and why is the rate lower or higher? Which is it and why?

WHY?

Drops in daily high temperatures by 20 degrees is drastic. This is indicative of global cooling but the goons report the opposite. Again, the flip-flop of reality is not meant to help you, rather harm you.

Should you begin to believe global warming, would you shed your heavy clothes just before at the coldest winter were to hit, just after the bidens have destroyed production and movement of goods and services to you, leaving you literally, in the cold, and freezing, to death?

Weather forecasts and reports cannot be described as normal or above normal. In science, normal does not exist.

These goons are absolute filthy worthless, lying enemies of we the people. You have all been manipulated to believe their lies and feel excessive heat that does not approach the heat of a decade and two ago.

There is no climate change; no global warming; there is no ozone, no ozone layer and certainly no measurable ozone.

There is no global warming. There are no rising oceans, no climate refugees, no more hurricanes than “normal” and above all, there is no scientific methodology involved in scare tactics of the international bolshevik/banker media.

Yauney and Cronk are evil, lying, luciferian puppets of an evil, world-wide regime hell bent on eliminating 15/16ths of the world’s population and the fake science of global warming is designed to play a part.

Are you so dumb you believe fake science, pretend science?

MORE REGARDING MY 3/3/18 COMMENTARY, “OCEAN FLOOR SINKING”

More regarding my commentary of 3/2/18, “Ocean floor sinking”

I had written and published a commentary refuting the moronic idea that the ocean floor is sinking. It occurred to me that I missed a major point. If the ocean floor is sinking, dropping, where is it going? That was a part of my original commentary, but there is another related point to consider.

If the ocean floor is sinking, dropping “down”, from what relative point is it dropping? There must be a measurement and comparison of pre-test conditions and post test: science.

Is the ocean floor sinking with respect to the land, the shores around the world? If it is, then water is not rising. If the ocean floor is sinking, then the ocean water level at the shoreline is dropping, not rising.

Where is the benchmark, for measuring such changes in elevations and depths? Non-existent? Hmmm, do the dem/lib dimwits even know what a benchmark is? Not very science-ish, is it?

Or, the ocean floor is sinking and water is rising, keeping the level with respect to the land, around the world, the same, constant. The dumb bolshevik manipulators of reality make neither claim. They just fabricate and lie. Who went to the ocean floor and measured the depth, and from where?

Do you see, that I almost made the argument for the climate-hoaxers by stating the water levels have remained the same, but it is because the volume of water has increased. The dementocrats and la-la-land liberals, spewing grotesque globalist/bolsheievik fraud, do not have the capacity for intellectual honesty or study. What a bunch of illiterate, ignorant boneheads.

Do you see how stupid dem/lib, progressive/bolshevik, unsubstantiated headline claims are?

It is intellect that prompts questions, not lock-step, droning, liberal news and dementocracy.

Think! Ask questions, why…

THE BURDEN OF PROOF IN CLIMATE CHANGE, GLOBAL WARMING, “SCIENCE”

Original publication on SLC Craigslist, June 15, 2016, in response to a post by Utardia, a “writer”, regurgitator of marxist/liberal climate dogma.

The burden of scientific proof rests with the prosecution. There is two basic results of science: proving a theory or hypothesis, or failing to prove a theory or hypothesis.

Utardia, that dimwit lying crap-superstar, claims I need to provide proof. Is that proof of a negative? Is that proof that where I stand exists?

A tradition is immovable until it is movable, by something new, and obvious. Global hoaxing, I mean warming, is magnificently NOT obvious, except to dictatorial goons making big bucks off others’ fears, and obvious to bogus scientists extrapolating something from clearly NOTHING. When I say nothing I mean no data, no pre-test, no post test, no control group, no measurements, but lots of polluting and “reinterpreting” standard, immovable data.

It is all a fraud, a lie based on imaginary demons and fire breathing dragons, heating up the world. Where are the dragons other than the nether reaches of political scientists’ ever-augmenting ethereal interpretations of imaginary science from cosmological shock troops?

I might add that all those innumerable “climate scientists” do not exist. There are writers galore, political puppets who quote each others’ papers and stories of studies.

“The oceans will rise by 20 feet by the year 2015”, 144,000 Witnesses of Jehovah will be taken heavenward in 1918, I mean 1933, I mean 1975, I mean 1999, I mean okay who is this Jehovah guy”? “The climate system will kill millions by 2012”. Pictures of moose dying, deserts and dead fish on the shores all cause world-wide stench by 2010”. Obama will turn back the rise of the oceans by shear will power.

Some will argue he did it. Then why do we need anything else? Why do we need political exertion, taxation and subservience to the democrat party and liberals when obama can do it all?

Come on people, the oceans have not risen, temperatures have dropped. It is colder today, it cools off at night, and summers are shorter. Fewer people die from heat waves today than they did 20, 30 and 40 years ago.

We stand on solid ground of tradition. Somebody designed a thermometer well over a century ago, and that same thermometer is the standard.

What is the standard?

Water boils at 212 degrees at sea level, and freezes at 32 degrees. There is no change in that. That is the standard. Who will challenge that? Who would even think that this fact is not one of the world’s most reliable templates? 

Why do global hoaxers, I mean warmers, even attempt to change these standards?

We can always make new thermometers at the boiling point, and and it is still the standard because it is still the boiling point and we design and change OURSELVES to that fact.

Global hoaxers, I mean warmers, have been trying to change We, the People, and reality to their inconsistent and shifting predictions. They have no standards because they are sloppy, pretentious, anti-science comic-cons. Where is the data?

Data is not data unless it has a standard and a means of measuring preconditions and new, or changing conditions. This is science, the beginning of science.

How do we measure time? We measure it by change. We make a 24 hour day of a time frame between sunrise and another sunrise. We don’t dictate that we want 24 hours in a day, and make the planet rotate different. But that is the approach global hoaxers, I mean warmers, have taken.

We do not look at the sunrise and try to slow it down so we can have 25 hour days. That is ludicrous. It borders on insanity if not full blown lunacy. But that is what global hoaxers, I mean warmers, are trying to do with no data, no pre-test, no post-test, no measurements, and no sea level markers. They have not even tried to present this simple experiment because it is a failure every time.

Surely, somewhere along the way, maybe 10 years ago, maybe 20 or 30 years ago, someone, a real scientist, must have surely stuck a stick in the water and measured ocean levels regularly to show ocean-level rise. Why has no scientist presented this data? Would this data be irrefutable if it could be found to show a rise in ocean levels? Absolutely, and I would concur. But there is not one single reference to a stick in a rock anywhere? Absolutely nothing! NOAA, for example, has absolutely nothing that represents a stick in a rock, or anything an intellect could imagine and design to measure change.

So, I ask, are oceans rising? Surely it must be obama that stopped the rise, with just his word.

How much did it rise before he made the promise? ZERO! That was a  pretty safe bet for him, was it not.

It must be zero, otherwise dem/lib politico/scientists would have shown us. NOTHING!

The burden of proof is always on the upstarts, the new science, the new theories and hypotheses.

I am a cop, standing in the middle of the street, directing traffic. Who will argue that traffic flows at my standard, stable, already existing presence?

It takes a pre-test to assert the variables for the study, and it takes measurements of some sorts (maybe time lapse of driver response due to traffic officer’s directions, as compared to time lapse when traffic officer is not present).

You see, dear reader, the burden of proof is not only on the new science, or new theory or new hypothesis to show a change, but it is a heavy burden to first show the standards by which change will be measured and then presented as illuminating.

There is nothing obvious in dem/lib global hoaxing, I mean warming, except the raging lunacy of pseudo-scientists fabricating fear and catastrophe from lunatics’ imaginations, all done for money.

It is not my burden to provide truth to an existing science. The burden of proof, in science and almost everything, lies solely with the party making new claims or challenging established thought and tradition. The burden of proof lies with those trying to show change. Science is change, measurable change. If it is not measured there is no data, no measurable change and, hence, no science.

Global hoaxing, I mean warming, is the new claim of change, without a shred or attempt to show the change.

I see it this way. When I was a boy, some days when I would arrive at home after school I would walk in the door and smell baking. Imagine I walked in the house, and my mother says, “do you smell that?” Smell what, I ask. “The baking bread, she replies.” No.

“Well, I smell it and it is good”, she claims. Hmmm I do not smell anything.

“No matter”, she says, “will you wash the bread pans please?”

What bread pans? “The ones I baked the bread with”, she she says.

Ok, I guess you see bread pans.

“Of course I do”, she emphatically states, “right there on the counter by the sink.”

Okay, I believe you. Here I am, washing bread pans.

When I am finished washing imaginary bread pans, I sit at the kitchen table and my mother then places an empty plate before me and says, “enjoy the freshly baked bread”.

Okay mom.

In this anecdote, would you think my mother had lost something? Why do global hoaxers try the same with you and I? Are they insane or dishonest?

Global hoaxing, I mean warming, has the burden of proof, and that is why it fails so miserably. There is not even an attempt to provide pre-test conditions, post-test, hypothesis. My mother could have placed store-bought bread on plate, and tried to convince me she had baked it. Without the pre-test conditions: aroma of freshly baked bread, used bread pans and flour on the counter, I am not convinced. The global hoaxing, I mean warming, community, that does not exist except in papers by writers, tries the same. They show nothing with which a comparison, or change can be made.

I come home from school occasionally to the smell of freshly baked brread, and that is a change from the day before, and many days prior. Where is the change in the global hoaxing, I mean warming, claims?

Do we remember our science projects in grade school? The lab paper had a section for observation.

Today’s global hoaxers, I mean warmers, cannot even present “observations”. They make all kinds of claims and protests. Well, they try to present observations but any so-called observations I have investigated are always observations of something else, they claim is connected to itself. They present fear, based upon imaginary dragons fabricated for pseudo-scientists’ financial gain; fabricated by monster-imagining writers.

After the fact observations are nothing if there is no pre-fact observations. The global hoaxers never provide pre-test observations, only claims.

Where are the observations, measurements, standard by which change can be observed?

How can global hoaxers, I mean warmers, make observations without anything to observe, and how can they draw conclusions without anything to observe taken from nothing presented? There is an incredible lack of connection in all this global hoaxing “concluding” without establishing and observing.

Did the morons, for example, observe dying polar bears? Where?

Did the boneheads observe a rise in the sea level of the stick in the rock on the shore? Did the rock move? Did the boneheads move the rock? Who would do such a grievous assault on science, fact and truth itself? Liars, with a political motive. Welcome to global hoaxing!

It is not my responsibility to prove another’s theory wrong, it is the party challenging established thought and tradition that is responsible for proving truth and credibility of his or her claims and theories. Until he or she provides data, measurements, clinical and or laboratory work, the theories remain theories.

The change of scientific belief is not a fact until it is actually factual. All the global hoaxers have is fear, fabrication, and quoting other’s fears and fabrications: all for money.

The NOAA site is a fantasy of global hoaxers, I mean warmers, continually augmenting fear from fear, and from third party fear and fabrication. It is easy to see when they start talking in circles.

Science is proved, often, when scientists and the free market are convinced. I have used the invention of the rifle as an example.

When rifling was first theorized and explained, denying a better flight by a rifled bullet compared to a musket ball was accepted. That is science. After obvious proofs and evidence: observations of rifle accuracy compared with musket accuracy, denying rifles provide a better, more accurate flight, was considered rifling denial. The deniers did not last long. They were killed in the battle lines because they refused to adapt to the science: the proof by observing pre-test and post-test. They refused to change their views to fact and reality.

It is logic retardation that dimwit utardia tries to present nothing to the public as a rational argument. Global hoaxing presents observation-less observations: unsubstantiated claims.

Again, where are the observations? Where are the obvious results, of something, anything, even attempts to lie or deceive?

We are not asking for fear mongering, predictions, models or quotes from others without the necessary facets of science. We want observations and the obvious, nothing else will do. We want IRREFUTABLE science.

RESPONSE TO CRAIGSLIST, MARCH 3, 2018, REGARDING THE OCEAN FLOOR SINKING”

RESPONSE TO CRAIGSLIST, MARCH 3, 2018, REGARDING THE OCEAN FLOOR SINKING”

Update: See 4/11/21, same title, additional opinion for original commentary.

RE: The ocean floor is sinking.”

We are looking at another fake news article by headline only, lacking, of course, substance found anywhere, including the title.

Where is it going? Is it falling into the hollow earth? Is it like that ultra stupid movie, “2012”, in which the California coast suddenly fell into nothing? How could a nothing exist under land when tectonic plates, that move, exist and seep from the ocean floor, where water could then flow through the openings into the VAAAAAAAAAST emptiness into which the California coast collapsed?

Where is the “sinking ocean floor” going? What is being pushed up somewhere else as part of the process of plate movement?

If plates move, then plates moving should be the “NEWS”, not the ocean floor sinking (unless of course that bonehead, moronic science-retard can explain or relate where the ocean floor is going).

Are these dem/lib agent provocateurs; these lying agents of global tyranny, so stupid they think We, the People, the masses, are as stupid as they are?

We, the People are not totally conditioned to believe the gross stupidity that these numbskulls present.

Where is the ocean floor going, to the moon?

Where is the ocean floor going, falling off the edge of the earth?

Where is the ocean floor going, what is causing it, and what is being “PUSHED” up elsewhere?

How can dem/libs be so totally science-retarded that they cannot even pretend to write scientifically?

They are so motivated by tyranny’s dogma and gains, because they are part of the gross misinformation and propaganda system, they cannot look objectively at anything, especially their own sub-human, sub-intelligent claims and lies.

BLOODY STUPID archons!

RE: “THE OCEAN FLOOR IS SINKING FASTER THAN EVAAAAAR RECORDED”

RE: “THE OCEAN FLOOR IS SINKING FASTER THAN EVAAAAAR RECORDED”

The title, “RE: “THE OCEAN FLOOR IS SINKING FASTER THAN EVAAAAAR RECORDED” was posted on Craigslist January 7TH 2018. I attempted to post my response, and have tried recently as well, and CL refuses to publish. Sometimes I swear at CL in the title, and sometimes in the “location”, and sometimes CL will finally publish, but not this one and many others. Craigslist allows the sickest garbage from the lying la-la-land liberals and denetocrat bolsheviks, but truth is censored. CL can go to hell.

It is just too easy, and funny.
When was the ocean floor sinking last recorded? Never.
Look at the date on the copyright symbol. It is 2003-2012, Frank Osborne PhD”
This is, at best, 5 year old “data”, or writing of a maybe data or reference to maybe data.
There is no Frank Osborne PhD.
The ocean floor is sinking faster than ever, about five years ago.
Frank Osborne, footballer, can be found as the only notable person on the internet by that name. Any real scientist with a PhD, ascribing his or her name and credibility to a study or paper, will certainly be a real person in the science community, and would want to be known. No such scientist as Frank Osborne is found anywhere.
This is typical of the dem/lib/commie/globalists. They lie.
The global tyranny hoaxers fabricate and add emotion-manipulating words and co-opted terms, such as EVAAAAAAAAR to every piece of propaganda they produce. Can the nitwit not spell? One could certainly write EVEEEEEEEER, and at least include correct letters. One must surely wonder how stupid dem/lib global hoaxing writers must truly be. Are they really so stupid they cannot spell ever?
Trusting readers and naive readers might be fooled with the silly combinations of words dem/lib hoaxers throw together to form a semblance of intelligence. It is all a pretentious fraud.
Truly amazing how these dimwits think they can fabricate anything and normal people will just believe everything given to them, even though the fabrications are outrageous, sometimes outrageously funny.
Moronicus begins with a seemingly intelligent title, “Crust Deformation Processes”.
In the title, a mark of a loser, fake scientist, a message of non-science is expressed in a statement that is written so as to act also as a fact, even though the use of the word apparent, exposes the reality: that there is no evidence in the least. “Apparently”? How apparent? Through the whole pretentious fabrication, we are given no idea in the least as to how apparent this pseudo-fact is. Without a reference to a single measurement or walk to the seashore, there is ABSOLUTELY no data hence, no reality.
What is “Tide Gauge Reconstruction”?
I started dissecting this silly fabrication and will continue tomorrow.
Suffice it to say, right now, with only a scant investigation into the dem/lib/global hoaxing/communist lies, that this is a poor effort to sound scientific, while showing nothing of a scientific mind, especially excluding an understanding of anything scientific or mathematical.
This is the first sentence of the “article”, “Since tide gauge observations only sample the ocean at a limited number of locations, the difference between relative and geocentric sea level changes reconstructed from tide gauge records may diverge from the underlying basin mean or global mean difference.”
Try this interpretation: Since observations of x only sample y at a limited number of locations, the difference between relative and geocentric z, reconstructed from records of x (but not observations of x) may be different from the underlying average variable c or global average difference. An average difference or difference between an average is as impossible as it it to count to two with the number two Average requires more than one variable and this nitwit remark provides an average global difference. It is almost too stupid to describe. An average is not a difference and a difference is not an average, and this boneheaded fabrication is trying to compare the one variable and a part of the variable that makes up the variable.
What the hell is that? It is not even coherent enough to be twisted and totally disfigured to make a formula.

INCONSISTENCIES IN DEM/LIB PROPAGANDA REGARDING GLOBAL WARMING.

Inconsistencies in dem/lib/progressive/eugenicist propaganda regarding global warming.

I do not use that word, propaganda, lightly.

To propagate something is is to create propaganda, but specifically, the unspoken meaning of words, particularly, the word “propaganda” is that propaganda includes an element of deception.

The panacea of global warming is a massive fraud.

To apply “global warming”, or the new co-option, “climate change”,  as the cause for almost everything that the propaganda agents fabricate, is to defer the scientific method, finding cause of effect, and making change. It is tantamount to using a nuclear weapon for a mosquito problem.

First of all, global warming is undefined. It is indefinable, by design. It is an over-generalization meant to cover everything the dem/lib/progressives decide to control.

No matter where we go; no matter what we read or hear, global warming “specialists” pop up with indictments for nothing but fabricated causes, unrelated results and completely disconnected solutions.

On craigslist rantsandraves, in Salt Lake City, one liberal “writer” continues to accuse every incident of weather and democrat party distrust and rejection, on the big bad wolf of global warming.

The big bad wolf, of lore, was never a wolf. What was the wolf? What is the wolf?

The vampire, the killer in the myths does not exist. There never was a vampire. There is no such thing as a vampire (well, except democrat politicos sucking the life and blood out of America). Democrat politicos and liberals is the closest thing to a real vampire in existence. I am tempted to state boldly that even democrats are NOT vampires per se, but who knows for sure how many lives the clintons have personally taken. Maybe they have even drunk the blood of their victims. The big bad wolf is a metaphor but vampirism and satan worship are not myths.  Even though satan the being may not exist as myth claims, Satan worship is not a myth. Vampirism is not a myth either. Histories of 

I remember a picture of butcher-billy-bob clinton hugging a woman in Kosovo. The story is that she was part of a blood sacrifice the following evening and clinton, master mahan clinton, did the sacrifice.

Our local utardia, moron blames everything on global warming, but that does not solve the problem.

It is not intended to solve fabricated problems, proven simply by the fact that the dem/libs offer only political solutions to problems that do not exist. The big bad wolf is a fabrication placed in the minds of unsuspecting victims by others, those who want control of the victims. How are the victims identified? The solutions are never problem related, indicating an agenda supra to the fabricated problems of global hoaxing.

I could refer to an innumerable examples dem/libs present for which the causes are amazingly disconnected.

Our local moron, not so local, an agent working Utah and other locales, admittedly, living over 2,000 miles away, posted an article on Stephen Hawking stated, to paraphrase, ‘the release of CO2 from the ocean floor would elevate temperatures to about 250 degree’.

Who is responsible for that CO2 release? How is that CO2 release my problem or a result of my actions, in any way? Yet, the monster fabricator claims I need to submit to democrat party rule with no cause-and-effect connection: no reason why. How are these two entities related? Obviously, and logically, they are not, but in the minds and fabrications of dem/libs they are related.

They are related by effect but not cause. They are related by the effect of extracting my compliance using a tool of rhetoric, deception, or outright fraud, whichever you want to call it.

it does not matter what cause the dem/lib frauds use, the effect is always submission to democrat party/liberal rule. I am not talking about submission to democracy, or rule of law. I am not making a reference in the least to submission to or participation in Constitutional Republic, self-governance.

When I use the word rule, it is more closely associated with tyranny, despotism, dictatorship, and murderous oppression. This is what the dem/libs offer. If it is not obvious by their use of words, it must obvious in their avoidance of words such as Constitution and representation, and terms such as rule of law, self-governance, and Bill of Rights.

The effect is always centralized rule, taking away our rights to individual decision making and individual opportunity.

The big general “global warming” hoax is designed specifically to give tyranny an excuse to oppress and rule. This is slavery.

But where are the connections to the problems? There are none. Returning to the example of the Hawking claim that the earth will experience 250 degree heat, and doing some research, we discover Hawking never made that statement. In my search for that claim I found no reference by Hawking, at all, to global warming. Hawking, being a scientist, or at least a mathematician, could not, in a scientific vein of integrity, make such a claim.

Surely Hawking understands scientific methodology of proving or disproving a theory or hypothesis.

Surely Hawking would know that an immeasurable CO2 quantity at the bottom of the ocean could NEBVER be traced to the effect dem/libs continually propagate: democrat party rule without opposition or dissent.

What is the actual cause of this fabricated CO2 release?

Why does the dem/lib effect only include a deflection from the undefined problem, the cause of CO2 release? Why does the dem/lib effect avoid the cause of this mysterious CO2 build-up, and the necessity of compliance to democrat party compliance? Is there a real cause or is it a causal claim only?

Should we define the problem of global warming we might be able to attack the causes.

Sticking to the posted, fabricated claim, what is the cause of CO2 release?

If it were dry ice sinking to the bottom of the oceans, releasing CO2 that binds to sediment or rocks down there, then how could we stop dry ice from sinking to the bottom of the ocean, and where and how is this dry-ice created and transported to the ocean? If dry ice were transported to the oceans, would it not dissolve on the way? Why an how does CO2 get to the bottom of the oceans and from where did it spring into existence. The idea that CO2 can be released from the bottom of the ocean is not as far-fetched and ludicrous, lunatic in fact, as to how the CO2 got to the bottom of the ocean? Is CO2 a gas? Does a compound in a gaseous state not rise in water?

Do not expect logic in anything the global warming/climate change writers fabricate. Yes, I used the word writers. I have not found a scientist doing an experiment or measuring a thing related to climate or weather in any of the articles I have dissected from IPCC, NASA, NOAA, AAAS, WMO, or other related pretenses.

What has caused, if we assume even the most insane fabrication to be exemplified, the “gathering” or build-up of CO2 on the bottom of the ocean? Can the pretentious, deleterious effect be reversed? That would be a start to cause-and-effect science and problem solving. But the dem/libs do not want their fabricated problems solved. If they did their claims would include measurements, data and and presumptions, such as one would find prepared as a theory or hypothesis. Nothing is ever forthcoming, except attacks and emotional manipulation.

They do not even want their fabricated problems discussed, hence the deflective and childish ramblings from the discussions.

But let us take this pretense even further. Suppose there actually is a build up of CO2 on the bottom of the ocean: setting aside the deceptive and manipulative impossibility spontaneously springing to threatening proportions,  by this utardia traitor. Suppose we set aside the insanity of claiming something for which there is no data and something for which data cannot even be acquired; what is the cause and how can it be reversed, if that is the goal? 

When global warming is broken down it is obviously not about reparations to the planet.

CO2 emissions from the ocean floor are going to cause 250 degree temperatures, according to global hoaxers pretending to quote Stephen Hawking. HOW?

According to scientists pretending to listen to a fellow “peer-reviewed” guy, pretending, the ocean floor will release CO2 and will cause major catastrophes, 250 degree temperatures are not life threatening, rather life terminating, immediately. Who went to the ocean floor and ensured CO2? Who discovered a change in CO2 levels on the ocean flor? Who measured change, and developed a pattern showing an increase oi CO2 levels of ocean floor pretense? Who did anything, except manipulate fear to force compliance to a ghost on the bottom of the oceans?

The problem; the weird thing about this impending catastrophe, is that CO2 emitted is the earth’s problem, not mankind’s problem. I thought the whole global hoaxing challenge was to stop man’s destructive impact on the climate, but CO2 escaping from the ocean floor, as Hawking states (or is falsely accused) cannot be directly, oddly or even mysteriously connected to anything mankind or any person may have done, especially to such a degree as to affect the whole world.

If so destructive, so potentially devastating to end all life, why are scientists right now, not trying to stop the devastating effect? If 250 degrees is projected, as the dem/lib hoaxers claim, then that is the biggest problem in the world, not man. Will global hoaxer utardia rally mankind? What scientists are addressing this sacrosanct event and who is doing something about it, or is it silly? Maybe we should make a hundred billion tons of concrete and pour it in the oceans to seal the bottom of the ocean from releasing CO2?

The insanity is that the dem/libs are doing what tyranny always does, and they want the same results: total control of all people. There is nothing new to tyranny’s cries for unification to fight an unseen enemy, along with massive surrender of rights and wealth to the criers.

They, the global inciters, hope you, We, the People forget that we are being led to do the same things others in other civilizations have done in the slide to slavery.

We are given only drips of information so we can be convinced the science is there but invisible and/or difficult because of the slow acquisition of data and knowledge, that never materializes.

SATIRE: AS ARCTIC ICE MELTS DUE TO NORMAL HEAT OF SUMMER…

As Arctic ice melts due to the NORMAL heat of SUMMER….

What a moron, utardia, writer on Craigslist.

Colder summers, colder winters, earlier falls, later springs, adds up to global hoaxing, not global warming.

They call it “climate change” now because if they had to call it “warming” they would have to defend their positions from everybody who knows the trends are cooling. They could call it pollution, what it really is, and that would direct resources to solve the real problems. As it is, the global hoaxers have no concerns for the real problems and real solutions: solutions that are definitely needed. They are more interested in compliance, oppression and control of We, the People, and lining their pockets as ignorant, deflective “expert” liars. They have the midas touch of turning other’s wealth into their own, by stealing through government. 

Global hoaxing is protectionism, the root of all tyrannies.

We are going into an ice age. Let us see if I can whip up the same fear and manipulation using the same tactics as the dem/lib hoaxers. I predict, in keeping with modern trends, that the earth will be in an ice age by  2750 ADHD. We can expect -300 degree temperatures and almost all life on the planet will be eliminated. We can expect to wake up very cold in the mornings, and when we look out the windows, we will not see the missing climate signals, that utardia left for our future use in 2750 ADHD.

When we look at the star placed above the squiggly lines and cool colors on my global hoaxer numbers chart x-axis versus un-measured temperature increases, on the y-axis, we see a really cool depiction of a pyramid. YAY, just what we wanted. It is quite pretty although there is a spot where we will have to change the results of our studies to make that left line a little straighter. Welcome to liberal la-la-land, global hoaxer-ville.

Most global hoaxers are so science-deficient and challenged they forget to leave one or the other axis off their “charts” and”graphs”. It is like not knowing enough to add flour to bake bread, and then claim it is baking. We witness, in every chart, claim, “news” report and post  more goofy fabricators left off their charts and science-ish models and projections.

Stephen Hawking was interviewed. When asked about climate change he stated, and I quote, “that utardia/scum-puppet, is a moron.”

It’s true. I read it in a “paper” about a consensus of scientists that consensussed together, panelling together to make a consensus of papers that claim the papers are consensus, regarding some scientists, a community of 32 million, that claim Stephen Hawking said just that.

This satire is probably much clearer to you, dear reader, than anything from utardia/scum-puppet/ weird dave/editor/predator, NOAA, WMO, NASA, and AAAS. We are wild and crazy global hoaxers, I mean guys.

Please, fellow Americans, lighten your lives with humor. Go to the aforementioned sites and read, from a perspective of science, the “stuff” they fabricate.

Imagine you are in your high school chemistry class and the lab instructor is introducing a lab experiment. Compare that experience to the fluff and stink of the sophist, pretentious, fraudulent words of the aforementioned sites.

I have made commentary, but I cannot cover it all.

Hawking continued, being the pure scientific mind he is, “All the evidence shows the earth is cooling, heat is escaping the planet in buckets, and I predict minus 100 degrees at the equator by 2750 ADHD.”

No, really, it is true. He actually said that. He consensussed with other global anti-hoaxers, in his usual scientific jargon. lol. Don’t you love, it, buckets? Funny?

Not much different than looking for missing climate of the Louisiana floods. Utardia concocted, “Searching for climate signals…”.

When was the last time “that thing next door, named climate, sent a signal? Was that his order by phone for pizza delivery?

“Climate signals”? that is too funny. 

Didn’t that moron utardia quote some source, hmmmmm, Hawking, who predicted 250 degree temperatures, like Mars, by 2050 because of CO2 emissions from the bottom of the ocean floor?

Is utardia that much of a moron!

When was the last time Hawking was on the ocean floor? When was utardia/political scum-puppet on the ocean floor? When was the last time anyone was on the ocean floor? When was the last time a god, was on the ocean floor, I mean except when he put frozen CO2 ice cakes down there, 250 billion years ago. Was utardia, that moronic dinosaur around then?

How much of fools does utardia take We, the People to be?

That mutt, for that presumption and morose attack on reality, deserves to swing.

It just takes one judge to issue a bench arrest for anyone of the thugs in power. We, the People will rally. We have seen it.

It just takes one!