Tag: nasa

PART 4: “NASA OBSERVATORY RECORDS UNUSUAL ACTIVITY ON THE SUN.”

Lucifer-sam writes, “Space is very big and, often, very weird.” Dufus, liar supreme sam continues, “Last week, an image captured by…”

What is an image?

An image? Captured? How does one capture an imagined non-sequitur?

Even nasa admits, every day, they have no actual photos or reality.

Please, take note that the words image and imagine have the same latin root word and mean, “less than real: circa 1200”, ”a piece of statuary; artificial representation that looks like a person or thing,” Also defined as, “reflection in a mirror” , early 14th century.

So a nasa image is either a reflection, an artificial representation, or less than real, but not real.

So nasa’s theories regarding distances are not real. The distance of one is dependent upon the unreal, artificial distances of others. All are dependent upon unreal, imagined, and superficial distances that not only cannot be substantiated, but cannot substantiate anything claimed to be in association. NOTHING is real.

Imagine means visualizing the unreal, “to create something in one’s mind.”

Not a shred of reality to NASA imagination, but who creates these nothings? Who portrays and depicts and represents these artificial creations? People, or “people” do this.

These image creators and liars are evil people, so devious and degenerate, they cannot be considered people or human.

One can see video, actual film, of rocket lift-offs, burning fuel and fire and brimstone; rockets lifting into the sky, perhaps 10 miles or 20 miles, but the connections of these obvious realities to “space”, is absolutely non-existent, and beyond the unknown distance of the cover of the atmosphere to where “space” begins, nothing is real.

I speculate regarding distances and heights. I am free to speculate because nobody, including nasa has a single measurement for substantiating anything.

Please find something! Find an equation or measurement nasa has measured, applied and used to calculate anything.

There is no film in existence of a rocket lifting into the atmosphere beyond what nasa actually allows to be filmed, and more nothing at heights greater than nasa’s allowances.

This is all luciferian black magic, sleight of hand. The rocket disappears from view and most people assume it goes into “space” because people are told that is what happens.

What is the height a rocket reaches before it is gone from view?

If nasa wanted to convince we the people that a rocket travels to “space”, why not use computer technology to direct a telescope to follow it, and get actual film footage? Because it does not happen as the luciferian liars claim.

Imagine you are beside the track, watching a bobsled pass. For how much time of that whole run of two minutes, do you actually see the bobsled go by?

When rockets are launched, for how long do you see any piece of video, as the rocket passes? Did you notice the “rocket” does not leave the visual? How can that be when it zooms past at miles per second? It is imagery, drawn, fabricated to give classically conditioned minds something to believe: fabrications of faith in nasa’s religion.

Unless you are in a craft, or a video camera is in a craft traveling with or following the rocket image, as shown in the video, a camera attached to a point high in the atmosphere, would see the rocket cross its view for a fraction of a second, not what the video shows. Again, what object traveling with the rocket filmed the video “image” of the rocket burning to “space”?

From :13 to :16, of the animation the rocket stays in view without change. Impossible:

https://www.yahoo.com/news/this-week-in-space-sun-exoplanet-kuiper-belt-154354360.html

Something such as a video camera or CGI animation, follows the so-called rocket into the atmosphere. As film, this video depiction is impossible, as the article states, depiction. Video depiction, as shown, is impossible unless two rockets are launched together, one to film the other.

At highest velocity, the luciferians claim, the rocket escapes the atmosphere traveling 14 miles per second, or 25,200 mph. Doing the math of space theory or atmosphere height theory, where would a video camera need to be to watch a rocket pass it while remaining in view for 4 seconds, without change in size or position? The video is totally bogus, fabricated, imagined and drawn with CGI. That is the only explanation.

Even at an average velocity of only 1/10th the escape velocity of 25,200 mph, the rocket should escape the atmosphere in a matter of seconds, clearly out of range of any constant view for more than a fraction of a second. I am sure one can calculate the velocity derived from so-called force, if one has the thrust measurements of so-called rocket engines.

I am not about to go this deep into the equation, formulae and theorized distance from earth to “space”. You find the equations and measurements nasa claims exist, and report back here. I contend that nothing of the sort exists.

How long does it take for the rocket to reach max velocity, is one question of the whole theory, never shown in full. NEVER!

Even at 1/10th escape velocity of 25,200 mph, it is impossible a rocket could travel without breaking up. You could not even imagine anything traveling at 2,520 mph. The Concorde hit speeds of 1250 mph.

Rockets, we are led to believe, hit maximum speed of 25,200 mph? The acceleration in a 300 to 330 mile window of the atmosphere, would create a g-force that would crush rocks strapped into seats. It is 105 miles per second, according to theory. According to theory, how fast does the world rotate?

Do not forget that the rocket travels at an estimated velocity, not a measured velocity. Nobody, nothing can measure that high speed.

All anybody ever really need do to dissect and thrash stupid nasa, “space” and “globe” theories is to think and ask questions. How do you know that? Can you show me the calculation?

Based on what is that theory or presumption? How does nasa know the escape velocity of any rocket they claim launches into “space”? How then, does nasa know what is needed to escape the atmosphere, and what is the true distance of the height of the atmosphere?

Nothing is known: not a single thing yet magically nasa produces images, depictions and other fake film and photos of disconnected “space”, “space” travel, and moon and sun theorizing.

PART 3: “NASA OBSERVATORY RECORDS UNUSUAL ACTIVITY ON THE SUN.”

Now, finally, open the article, read and watch the animation.

The title of the article reads, “the sun just did something weird, and 3 other space stories you may have missed this week”.

The sun did something weird? How does nature that can only act natural, do something weird? How dumb. How is nature weird? How does the sun, totally untouched and unaffected by earth become weird?

What are the pre-test conditions and data, and post-test conditions, from which nasa makes comparisons to state the sun did something different or weird? Pre-test and post test, science, is absolutely missing from this goofy article. How utterly ridiculous can nasa luciferians get?

The subscript reads, “An oddball new exoplanet, small but significant steps toward the future of spaceflight and a mystery in the Kuiper Belt.”

“Oddball”? Wow, that is so scientific it is scary. What a stupid thing to write. How does a thing without feet step? What stupid clichés can only follow stupid “people”, 

A “new exoplanet”? A new planet discovered? “Exo”, as in external? There can only be an “exo” if there is an “endo”, or internal. And what determines ”exo” and “endo”? No comparators, no examples, no parameters or definitions, just stupid words and pieces tossed about to confuse and create education chaos. This is bloody, evil deception.

See how the luciferian liars toss in terms and words that mean nothing so they can sound smart and expert, so they can lie with impunity and control you first with fear and then LAW that follows your response to fear they create.

How much farther from earth than the sun, is this theorized planet?

If all nasa can provide is an animated depiction of the moon from earth, while the sun is even more out of the realm of visual possibility, then a new planet, even more distant than that, cannot be seen or discovered.

How utterly science-retarded can nasa get?

If the sun is impossible to see because the moon is impossible to see, then some crazy, theorized, fabricated, imagined new “exoplanet”, farther away, is absolutely impossible, and absolutely impossible to film or photograph.

The subscript reads, “An oddball new exoplanet… in the Kuiper Belt.”

There is no Kuiper belt because there is no measurement or substantiated distance. There is no relationship of these heavenly bodies therefore they do not exist. The distance to the sun is theorized to be 400 times the distance of the moon from earth, but the distance of moon from earth is not calculated so none of what follows, the whole of globe theory and nasa, is not substantiated and does not exist.

Sure, go ahead, build a house on a pretend foundation, and you don’t have a house, an attic, a garage. You don’t have walls, windows, doors and heat. It is impossible to build something on nothing.

Nasa and globe theory is all so much building on nothing. Show us the calculation of the distance of earth to moon. From that, maybe, one could extrapolate information, a measurement or two, to plug into an equation to calculate something from that foundation. Nothing!

I can line up 3 yard sticks, then four yardsticks at a right angle to the three, and then aim five yardsticks from the end of the three yard sticks to the end of the four yard sticks and create a right angle triangle. This is known as a 3, 4, 5 right triangle. It can be used to create a right angle for building something. You can see it. You can watch the creation of it and how it works. You can see the application of it in making a 90 degree angle out of measurements that can only come together in one way.

There is absolutely nothing of the sort, and less in partiality that lends credibility to anything luciferian nasa fabricates. Show us the one point fixed in space, not “space”, from which other variables are derived, measured and used to calculate anything? Nasa still does not have definitive distance of the end of the atmosphere, or beginning of “space” so the distance of earth to moon is impossibly known.

But, don’t believe me. Look at the animation. Look at the words of the article itself, written, fabricated by science-retard, sam matthews.

These yahoo”NEWS” writers are so dishonest and evil, they do not deserve capitalized names, being liars and devils that deserve no human recognition for their crimes against truth, reality, and humanity.

PART 2: “NASA OBSERVATORY RECORDS UNUSUAL ACTIVITY ON THE SUN.”

PART 2

This “technology” claim that the sun is visible, is as luciferian and completely evil, as anything nasa fabricates.

Find yourself the best camera and see how far it “sees” accurately. Get a telescope and see how far on land it “sees”. And you believe your telescope “sees” planets millions and billions of miles away? How is the light from a planet of such vast distance not completely dissipated?

It is unbelievably arrogant and science-retarded to think light is not dissipated over such vast distances. Even at 93 thousand miles, light is totally dissipated. 930 miles, 93 miles.

They claim they are looking at stars and other heavenly bodies that are millions and billions of miles away. How do they know? How, without a single calculation do they “know” the objects they see are not 200 miles away? They don’t.

Don’t ask why. Evil lies, must lie, and must flip-flop everything, for control.

Their lies are based on their fundamental lies.

Find the world’s most effective telescope, and goofle how far it sees effectively? 93 million miles? Impossible!

The Hubble telescope does not boast it can see the moon, much less the sun. If the Hubble cannot get actual photographs of the moon, it does not see it, and we know it does not see the moon because there exists no photos, only images, composites, drawings and CGI animations and depictions. They just said that.

Go and look for yourselves. when they can only animate and depict, it is an admission that they have no videos or photos of the moon.

Find the specifications of the Hubble telescope and report here.

Can any of the “space” theory goons show us the equation and numbers, with angle for triangulation, that determines the distance any telescope can clearly “see”?

NOPE!

Imagine a telescope can see 1,000 miles. How far is it theorized that “space” begins? Estimates are 300 to 330 miles high is where “space” begins.

Why do telescopes not film “space” walks, satellites, “space” craft?

Film, not CGI; not mystery locations in space where a camera floats and takes photos; film does not exist because the tasks are impossible, and nasa admits it with fake everything.

Why are there no actual videos of a rocket lifting off, and being traced into “space”? 

How far away is 93 million miles compared to 300 miles? If that is the best telescope technology can do, and I speculate, having seen no claims of visual contact from any telescope, then it is impossible given current technology, that anything can “see” the surface of the sun.

To see the surface of the sun clearly, one would need to build a telescope that has 93,000 times the resolution of the strongest telescope, based on visual acuity of 1,000 miles. Can these telescopes see across the planet 1,000 miles? Is it not curious that a telescope with apparent accuracy to see 93 million miles does not use that acuity to look across the horizon or into “space” to film satellites and rockets?

You see they, nasa et al, have you convinced that the planets they see in the heavens are millions and billions of miles, or light years away. How does the light from a star billions of light years away not dissipate?

But wait, estimates of moon and sun distances are based on prior estimates, based on nothing, based on gross inadequacies to guess if something is 200 or 200 million miles away. It is all lies. Nobody knows. Nobody has done a calculation. Nobody has a number to inject into an equation.

Telescopes claim they can look into the heavens and see planets at certain theorized distances. There was never a beginning point as to how far these heavenly bodies are so no comparisons can be made with references points that do not exist.

So, “scientists” might estimate the distance of the sun using completely erroneous estimates based on theorized distances of stars or moon. The stars might be only hundreds of miles away, reflections of things in the firmament.

Yes, it is possible there is a firmament, and no such fantasy as “space”. NASA has not filmed or photographed “space”.

If I am in my house, and wonder how cold it is outside, I look out the window and make observations. If I execute a pre-test and see water, and check an hour later to see the same water is freezing, I can theorize the temperature is below freezing. That is a start, observation. There is no starting observable point to nasa fabrications, lies and quackery.

There is no start to “space”; no pre-test; no science.

If I look up and see a star, I wonder what it is and how far away it is. If I have no means to measure the distance of that star, any guess, made popular by repetition, is an imagined guess at best. From that guess used as a benchmark for other distances, the 100% margin of error is multiplied.

I can estimate the sun must surely be closer than the stars, because it is bigger, or appears to be bigger, and that is all. I can theorize and nothing more. That is all NASA has, theory based on theory based on anti-science, anti-trigonometry, imagination. Show us one measurement NASA has ever made to back their guesses.

Theory based on theory based on imagination and fabrication could provide a margin of error of thousands or millions percent. No distance of any heavenly body has ever been calculated.

In reality, there is no proof that the strongest telescope “sees” farther than 300 to 330 miles, so the required magnification of the best current visual is actually 310,000 times more than we have.

I do not believe, in the least that nasa can see 1,000 miles much less 9,300 times that distance. You can believe that if you decide to believe the objects you see in the sky are the distances NASA and globe-theory imagine and perpetually repeat.

The sun must be 93 million miles away because we know the moon is 238,000 miles away, but the moon might only be 100 miles away. Nobody knows because nobody can produce an equation to measure that distance, and nobody has a single shred of data.

For all “science” knows the moon might be farther away, and bigger.

Go ahead, believe their claims and distances. Worst, believe liars are not lying to you that they know these things when they have absolutely nothing but planned deception to make you think something is known: that they are smarter than you.

Can you find information that shows how nasa technology does it? Can you find an actual photo of the moon that is not an image, a composite, a representation, drawing, CGI for animated depiction? How do you expect then, to find an actual photo of the surface of the sun? Again, can you explain, show, or prove the distance in any equation” Or, can you provide a reference to an equation measurement, or reference point in space or on earth from which extrapolations of distances can be calculated?

That image, a piece of a “footage” is a fabrication, a lie. Even nasa states it is an image and not a photo.

IMPOSSIBLE NASA/YAHOO”NEWS”, FEBRUARY 11, 2023, “NASA OBSERVATORY RECORDS UNUSUAL ACTIVITY ON THE SUN.”

The sub script to the headline reads, “Other space highlights from the week”

Upon opening the following is the article:

https://www.yahoo.com/news/this-week-in-space-sun-exoplanet-kuiper-belt-154354360.html

It is almost comical that fake, NASA science can see 93 million miles.

93,000 miles is impossible, and much less 1,000 times as much, 93,000,000 miles.

You must understand that just because we can see sunlight coming to us from theorized distance, does not mean we can see the distance of 93 million miles? It is theory that the sun is 93 million miles away. You must surely recognize the distance is not proved, formulated, or equated. No?

Can you find one measurement by NASA or globe theory that injects one number into an equation that measures, by triangulation, for example, the distance of the sun from the earth?

How do you measure distance? You walk it, drive it, or use triangulation to measure known variables and then use constants to calculate.

How else could someone determine the distance except by one or another equation or formula? It is impossible to look straight at an object even 93 yards away, and determine distance, and even more bizarre to think someone or something can look straight on and determine a distance over i.760 billion times greater.

When the guesstimate was made, did a survey transit with the capacity to measure a distance of 93 million miles exist? How about 93 miles, 9.3 miles?

Does such a survey instrument exist today?

How, anywhere in any realm of science, can a single eye, uni-vision of a telescope look straight on and determine the distance of any object? Do telescopes measure height of shadows cast by one planet on another?

The scenarios for guess and speculating are ludicrous, and anyone who thinks someone is telling any bit of truth when they speculate these ridiculous theories, is living in near-absolute ignorance.

Suppose you can see from one town to the next, can you look down the road and determine the distance? Can you do it better with a telescope or binoculars? No, it is worse with a telescope.

Can you look at your odometer and see the numbers click as you drive? How did the auto manufacturers derive a correct measure and place it in mechanism of an odometer?

It starts with a smaller measurement, the length of a foot and yard.

We know a certain number of feet and/or yards makes a mile. We could walk that distance with a wheel on a stick with a counter and use geometry with the measure of the circumference to determine distance.

We could look at a tower from one town to another, measure with a protractor the angle of ascent, and inject the known height of the tower to calculate the distance. It is all built upon measurements, equations and calculations.

For distance to the sun, or moon, or clouds, there is no measurement, not one, no equations ever used and nothing exists to be calculated. There is nothing, not a shred of data in existence to determine almost everything nasa and globe-theory pretend-science claims.

Not knowing the angle of ascent or the height of the tower, could anyone look straight at the pinnacle of the tower and know the distance along the level to the base? No! A million guesses might put someone close, but do it now for something hundreds of miles away. Impossible, and absolutely impossible for just the distance of the moon.

Please, globe-theory believers, show us the equation and numbers, used to determine the distance of the sun from earth.

Oh wait, it is based on other distances of planets. From what measurements, equations and calculations are these distances derived? None: all speculation and fabrication as well?

Make it easy, show us the measurements, angle and equation used to measure the distance of the moon from earth, 238,000 miles. Even NASA only shows an animated representation. Do your own goofle search. The search I found claims one can see the distance from earth to moon in an “animated depiction”.

Animated? Depiction? Drawings with numbers drawn, done in CGI? If nasa can only show the distance of the moon in an animated depiction, a cartoon, how on earth can anyone believe nasa can see the surface of the sun, according to theory, 390 times as far?

Again, not a single measurement or shred of data exists.

Now notice the image of this “sun” is quite detailed, according to animation, cartoon, drawing, CGI. It is a depiction, not video. From what is the depiction derived if there is no visual? It is imagined, a lie. From whose mind did this imagination come? I believe the surface of the sun looks like Kamala harris’ cheese face. I imagine it, and now I CGI it. How stupid can NASA get to think their whacko theories and imaginations fool people.

D’oh, they fool some.

If the depiction drives from a photo or video clip, why not publish the photo or video clip? Is the answer obvious to you? There is no reality to the imagined pretense. There is absolutely no reality to any visual of the sun.

Please take note that it is two very different things to see the sun’s rays lighting up the world, but quite another thing to see the surface of the sun. It is one thing to feel warmth coming from some unknown distance, but it is impossible for mankind to develop a camera or instrument of any kind, to see the sun, 93 million, 93,000,000 miles away,

PART 3. BOGUS WEATHER REPORTS. SPACE: THE FINAL FRONTIER. ALL KINDS OF FABRICATIONS AND LIES. ALL SCAMS ARE RELATED.

Think about the garbage you let in your head every day.

Do you watch television? Do you have a favorite sitcom?

What is a sitcom? Situation comedy.

It is a regurgitation of lies from one episode to the next, from series to series, of people trying to get away with something by lying. Somehow pandemic dishonesty is funny, humorous.

The precept for every single sitcom episode is constructed around a lie. Have you not wondered about the consistencies in your lives every day? Are you happy associating daily with dishonesty, dishonest people and deception? Do you look forward to being like those poliwood losers, liars, frauds and extremely stupid “people”?

Someone told a lie, because we are all “just human”; someone tried to deceive a spouse, a family member, or the law, and got caught: and that is funny, day after day, after bloody boring, evil, repetitive episode, and this makes entertainment, humor??

Are you so sub-intellectual you are that easily “entertained”? Sitcoms are not entertainment.

“Modern Family”? Do “they” mean modern collection of dysfunctional idiots that lie and prey on the dumb, you? Do “they” mean morons with semi-intellectual thoughts, living unnatural lives, portrayed as “normal” or “modern”, all fabricated to a predetermined end, every bloody, boring, dishonest episode after episode?

Do you watch dishonest people at work, and find the deceptions funny, smart, intelligent, intellectually stimulating? Do you find it funny and entertaining when someone lies to you, manipulates you, or uses you, like your role models do in your favorite sitcoms?

Another prevalent theme is that men are socially inept, retarded, and challenged, and that it takes a) authority, b) a woman or c) a child to straighten the dumb man’s thinking and actions back to “normal”.

Please do not forget, they are all acting. Do you realize they all follow a premeditated script: a plan to connect effects (the end) to unnatural and disconnected causes?

There is a fabricated end and the means do not waver, although the script writes in a little bit of internal conflict, detraction.

The ending is never “normal”. Can you not see that these scripts are predetermined, for their gain, your loss and pseudo entertainment?

These are stupid people pretending to be smart.

Again, you are entertained by boring, droning, abnormal deception?

The scripts are written to show men are dummies, authority is pure, presumed innocent and smarter, and women are just a step below authority. Search maternal incest. Poliwood elevates everybody above the white male.

Authority is government, according to poliwood.

Which “Star Trek” series did you prefer? Are you insane? It is all fake: situation dramas in a studio, “sitdram” if you will, prefabricated to an end for their gain: repetition, curiosity, and false hope for you.

Who has been in space? Astronauts have been caught lying.

Nobody has been in space! It is all a construct.

Start looking, study the composites, the images and look for an actual photo. They don’t even try to call anything a photo. Even “pictures” of storms and hurricanes are graphics, computer generations and fancy drawings: drama in science. They admit it.

Nobody, not one single person has provided a photo of earth from space.

Think about it.

We, man, can dive to the Marianna Trench in specially built submarines with windows to see and take photos, done under incredible pressure. But for some weird, strange reason nobody can make a window in a so-called space-craft, with all the technology available to us, to take a photo of earth from space.

And how did “they” determine there was such great resistance on “spacecraft” when re-entering the atmosphere, that it caused unbelievable heat? At the speeds “they” claim rockets re-enter, and in such a short sprint to the surface atmosphere, and beginning the descent in very thin air, how can friction from air molecules cause such great heat? How hot do jets get as they fly hundreds and, in some cases, thousands of miles per hour.

Has anyone seen a rocket hit velocity to leave the gravity of the earth? The levels of the atmosphere are:

troposphere: ground level

stratosphere

mesosphere

thermosphere

From the surface to the end of the thermosphere is approximately 400 miles, we are told.

How much resistance caused by particles of air and in the air would we find in the highest layer, where there is very very thin air? What affects the spacecraft’s re-entry?

Where are the formulae?

If there is no resistance in space, because there is no particles to interfere with movement, why do the spacecraft not open parachutes immediately upon hitting the thermosphere, or before?

What slows the rocket’s re-entry before the chutes are deployed? Air? If anything the “rockets” should speed up due to increasing gravity as the “rocket” gets closer to the pull.

How does air stop a rock from falling? How does air stop or slow a bullet falling back to earth, and why does that bullet not melt?

Why has NASA never had aircraft high in the sky taking photos or video of “spacecraft” launching or settling?

There are no photos of anything. There are computer generations, drawings with colors, and models: drawings and computer generated images.

There are composites, graphics, drawings and generated CGI. See for yourselves. Did Bozo-bezos or Shatner take a photo?

Back to the physics. I admit, I am speculating. What have you done?

400 miles to “space”, 300 miles of it in very, very thin air. So thin there is no way it causes even slight heat due to resistance of particulate.

A 100 mile drop to the surface remains. A “spacecraft” traveling at thousands of miles per hour spends only seconds in the 100 miles from the surface of the plane(t) to the troposphere.

Has anyone ever seen a calculation of heat due to friction? Where does one find friction coefficients for the very thin air political scientists theorize exists in upper atmospheric levels? 

Could the outside pressure on a deep sea craft be any greater than the internal pressure that tries to force out a window in space? It is minuscule even without the comparison. Air, in a very tight small space produces very little pressure, no pressure comparatively to the pressure of hundreds of atmospheres in the depths of the oceans.

Oh, but “they” claim glass melts in re-entry. Nope!

There are all kinds of compounds science has produced to prevent melting.

Not a chance any of this gobbledegoop science is measured.

Could we, with superior technology, not design glass to withstand high temperatures to take photos? Of course we can. Yet, none exists because “space, like everything you are fed, is a fallacy and fantasy: phantasy, phantasia and phantasm; not reality, a story; a phantom.

Even the most recent trip into “space”, Bozo-bezos and Captain James T. Kirk, of the ‘real” Starship Enterprise (William Shatner, an actor), went into space for “…a few seconds”.

But wait. No, they did not go into space. The most recent jaunt, with the greatest technological advances, could not go into space and could not take a single photo?

That’s it?

But wait, there is another element to this curiosity. How fast do missiles travel? Why is there no concern for their nose-cones melting, especially considering they travel as fast as “rocketships”, all in the denser parts of the atmosphere?

With all the technology; all the improvements in computers and controls and communications, Shatner and bozo only managed a jaunt into the stratosphere, for a few seconds?

WAIT! Stratosphere, not space? YES! They did not make it to the thermosphere, the highest level of the atmosphere. They did not make it to the mesosphere either, barely left the surface, 30 miles at best.

Space”?

The “NEWS” article in question, many outlets in fact, openly state the craft entered the stratosphere only for a few seconds. No need for worries about heat, really. No mention of it. The stratosphere makes up only about 30 miles of the overall theorized 400 miles atmosphere, basically 8% of the theorized heights of the atmospheric strata.

All the dementocrats know the scams, they volunteered to exploit and violate, YOU.

I go into detail regarding some of the inconsistencies and lies, outright silly fabrications, of just about everything.

I have written and published, in this last incarnation of my site, over 580 articles. If it is all just silly opinion, like this commentary might be, then it is at least organized and professionally presented. I do have some credibility. As Mao stated, “There is a quality to quantity”, and nobody will argue that I have quantity.

THREE STRIKES AND GLOBE-GOONIES ARE OUT: CHRIS NATION, ART GILLES AND DANIEL D. SMITH

Unbelievable, astounding science-based, logical, deductive and super-intellectual responses from the NASA paid political agents proving NASA’s integrity and “science”.

The “points” and “logic” of these perfectly sound and witty comments has sent me reeling, feeling lost, beaten, alone and drifting in the world. I am now quite certain, with the irrefutable points these intelligence superstars have made, that my view of the world has changed.

First up to bat, Chris Nation. Chrissy’s words of wit:

“Yes…very funny indeed…”

Can anyone tell us to what chris nation is referring?

Second batter, Art Gilles:

“bite down harder”

Wow, another astounding point made in favor of globe-earth theory. I am suffering, sweltering with embarrassment at how silly my scientific methodology is compared to the ….dare I say, gawd-like talent evinced by bolshevik-dick, arty.

Third bolshevik-dick, I mean, third batter, daniel d. smith. May I add, so precious is little cutie’s lie it is funny dick-dan writes. Dan-dick’s comment:

“Watch it again and start to really look at the video. The guy in red you can clearly see is an edited video but some conspiracy nutjob forget to edit out the wire as you can see it floating which means he would not have “dropped” that thing that fast.

It’s all edited to disprove nasa for the narrative of a flat earth.”

“and start to really look….”? Dick-daniel is just too lost from reality to even get language close. Did dick write… “Start to…”? Why not just simply go to the NASA website and get the source? Deflect and distract, dick-daniel, the bolshevik sub-intelligent goon “leader”. LOL. Danielsan-dick is the leader of the goon squad, and there are more.

More from me, intellect connected to gawd…

hahahahaha, dick-daniel, digging and digging, running while he sets his air on fire with anger, like the others. No picture of earth from “space”…., NOT ONE, EVER, just dig and lie, and distract and lie, and deflect and lie and lie and lie and lie. What a loser!

Can somebody verify the source of the video in question….is NOT, NAAAAAAAAAWT a plane(t) earth edit? Doesn’t that video come from NASA itself, and danny-dick knows it and LIES like a filthy bolshevik-whore!

D’oh, did daniel bolshevik-dick forget that very, VERRRRRRY important fact, FAAAAAAAACT? 

I got your back d-man. See your profile up at my site, giving you all the props you deserve.

Conspiracy….? Too funny. Only loser libs, progressive bolsheviks, and globe-earth theorists accuse others of conspiracy. And so what! THAT very vid, the one dicky-dan claims is edited by a “flat-earther” is the one posted at NASA. Let me repeat that for all investigating and those who want to know the depth of the disgusting sub-human bolshevik scum, globe-earth theorist daniel-dick bolshevik: THE VERY SAME ONE POSTED ON THE NASA SITE.

Three strikes boys. You’re outta here!

Send the next three goons. A song comes to mind…”Send in the Clowns” Next line, “…don’t bother, they’re here.

FAKE GLOBE-EARTH THEORY PROFILE: ROGER BARNETT COMMENT AND MY REPLY, 1/10/22

Barnett: “The earth’s shape is not a theory. it’s been known for millenia and has been quantified to closer and closer tolerances as time and scientific advances progress. FE? Bwahaa…. It’s nonsensical drivel..or dribble for those that foam it out their mouthes.”

Scores and scores of fake profiles all doing nothing but post fake-science, amazingly all in favor of globe-theory earth. Something is surely going on that brings so many ignorant goons together to propagate so many, and all the same, lies.

My Reply:

Known by whom? What tolerances? Barnett has no idea, surely regurgitating spew from his/her/its master handler. Again, Roger, tell us, what tolerances? What is the margin of error? Tell us what scientific progress it is that uses CGI and drawings to make a fake photo of earth, when nobody has ever been “in space”? You lying pos. Known by whom, Aristotle, Heracles, Herodotus, Jason and the Argonauts, Dustin the wind? What a loser! Nobody has known for millennia. What a sewage-sucking fraud! It is that simple.

For all reading this, by many things bolshevik-dick wrote, you can surely see how ignorant and un-scientific everything of dick-roger’s comment is. But, especially and specifically obvious is this: how does one “quantify” something that is not a quantity? 

Known for millennia? Who are you trying to fool? Even the dumbest of dumb, you anti-science, scientific methodology retards cannot be so stupid to totally ignore reality AND history. Are you really so stupid and grotesquely, fat, ugly and lying!

Your stupid pretense (millennia) is not only a stretch of gross magnitude, considering the Bible has been around for millennia, but even you, a real pseudo-person cannot be that stupid to ignore the reality that globe-theory is a theory. Do you realize that when someone says a word they mean it, like theory means theory?

But it is okay. I get where you are coming from and I have a picture of your “profile” and will post it to my site, with my reply, a shit-kicking for you for all to see, and beyond so others can see just how fake and politically motivated, sub-human you filthy bolshevik NASA agents are. You lie like a rat you filthy rotten agent provocateur.

WILLIAM SHATNER IN SPACE? NO, NOT A CHANCE. IT IS A SCAM!

Captain James T. Kirk, William Shatner in space. NO. It is a SCAM!

The “space” trip is a unique roller coaster ride in the stratosphere, not space.

The reports are that Shatner was in space for 10 minutes. Where? Was he in the stratosphere? If, as the “NEWS” reports claim, he experienced weightlessness for a few seconds, then he was not in space. It is the apogee of flight, experienced even in an elevator when it begins to move downward. Such organized, bs, especially from that dimwitted, lying bolshevik bitch, bozo bezos.

What purpose did this fake event serve? Who believes Shatner was in space? All those who believe Shatner was in space also believe many things related. Let us just begin with one thing: that bozo bezos’ craft has the power, force, lift or whatever is needed to escape the atmosphere. Does this bring into question the capabilities and capacities of other craft, including NASA “ships”, and their abilities to leave the planet?

As of yet, over 50 years later we have still not seen a picture of the earth. All representations are drawings.

Did Shatner take pictures, a picture of space, space travel, the earth or the darkness of space itself? No?

We briefly saw a video clip but removed, unavailable on eff bee. Were the pictures of the earth in the back ground drawings too?

Are there no windows in bozo besos’ craft? If we had windows in the first craft to enter space, why not now? Were they real windows? How could they be so big when other aircraft cannot sustain pressures of much smaller windows at lower elevations andhence, lower pressures?

Using computers, 50 plus years ago, that had less memory, speed and capabilities than our phones today, somehow, magically, We, humans, The U.S.A., NASA in particular, managed to produced space craft with windows, and take a picture, but no pictures from bozo bezos. Weird, isn’t it?

If you were to go into space would you not want to show pictures? If you were advertising space travel, at a price, would you not market your product enticing, using visual proof?

This is a major scam. Right now, when we are distracted from the bolshevik biden administration as they seize control of production, transportation, heat, movement and everything to keep We, the People free, and living.

This is the beginning of dementocrat/bolshevik-progressive genocide, and you all walked right into it.

Biden and the bolsheviks not only must be removed, they must be eliminated to save our world. The rulers have, as their prime goal, the elimination of approximately seven billion people: you and yours.

The bastards, the international bolshevik bankers have hung their flags in our institutions, declaring admiralty/corporate/maritime law, over our Constitutional Law, in declaration of wartime rule. Gold borders and gold tassels indicate these verities. It is war against YOU, me, all of us except those the dementocrats identify as subservient and permitted. Your face mask is only one part of your permission to live. You, 95 percent of YOU, WE, the People, do not have all the qualifications for permission to live, and they will be coming for you, more and more as seizure of OUR economies, rights, and freedoms are executed.

THEORY BASED ON THEORY IS STILL ONLY THEORY AND NOT REALITY

Theory based on theory is still only theory and not reality.

I watched a video of someone talking about time travel and how it was related to the use of black holes. Has anyone seen a black hole?

Seriously, has anyone been to a black hole? Has anyone actually seen a black hole by looking into the sky?

Who has claimed to have seen a black hole?

Who has seen a flux capacitor? Who has seen a spaceship?

Who has taken a picture of the earth from the heavens?

Why no pictures?

We were shown a picture of the earth through a window in 1969, so the story, from a so-called expert, goes.

If “they” could put a window in a spaceship then it can be done now, so surely there must be a window in all the rockets launched since. What would it take to place an automated camera in position to take pictures?

You can find videos that debunk the 1969 earth picture as a drawing behind a window in a dark room.

Incidentally, it is the same picture of the earth we are shown all the time.

Now, before you go crazy, yes, you, not me myself; before you go off your deep end writing words in your mind I have not written, stop.

Did I, myself, say I was a flat-earther or are you saying it? Did I say I did not believe in science, as I pound keys on my laptop, or are you going to extrapolate an irrefutably stupid conclusion from the opposite of evidence?

Has anyone proved gravity is what “science” theorizes? Yes, gravity is still a theory.

I look at water as it pours from a faucet. Have you noticed that water in many instances separates as it drops. I am not talking about spray. I have not theorized regarding water not falling directly “down”.

If water separates there must be a force to push strands of water from each other. Is that, perhaps, the same force that drags water down?

So, am I anti-science or just wondering about what theory of gravity is correct or  close? Do you feel a need to attack me for wondering? Are you experiencing fear regarding your beliefs because I, myself, wonder? I do not have fears in wondering; wondering about anything. I can switch my views according to reality. Can you?

I was quite involved in religion many years ago. I believed the Bible to be the word of god and believed in a supreme being and, in fact three deities, God the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit.

My belief system was tied to a belief in the originator and origination of the sect.

My belief system included a belief that Jesus, the Christ, was the source of mankind’s conscience. I believed that to deny conscience, the source, would make a man drift towards anti-social disordered behavior: psychopathy or sociopathy.

But my belief system was undermined by some revelations and my research, and I totally quit that religion.

I completely gave up belief in a supreme being when I discovered that I controlled my conscience and my commitment to living by conscience was connected o my desire to remain a decent human being. Of course some will challenge, based on their hate-motivated, fear-originated ignorance, not mine.

For 16 years I was a non-believer in God.

Lately, however, I wonder, again.

Too many coincidences and study of the sources themselves of alternate theories, regarding the earth, history and the mind have prompted me to wonder, again, if there is some order to this world.

I have constantly called the theory of relativity into question. It is a mathematical theory, you do realize? Who, of the many people you know, has travelled at the speed of light? Nobody?

Do you remember a day when science theorized that to travel in a vehicle faster than 50 miles per hour one’s head would explode? You don’t remember that?

Do you remember a day when doctors made house calls and prescribed herbs? Do you remember a day when there were no such food additives and drugs, and chemicals in humanity’s lives?

Do you recall ads describing smoking as good? Do you remember the pilgrims coming to America with large lumbering cows, or did they bring goats?

No matter what Newton called it, an apple fell from a tree, he observed it, and gave it a name. Somehow gravity stuck.

What is the latinate root of the word gravity?

Latinate gravitatem, gravitas means weight, heaviness, pressure, from the root gravis, heavy.

What started this ponderance is still a theory, time travel.

All the science fiction movies, most of them absolutely stupid, are based upon theories, and that is it.

Even my favorite sci-fi, Blade Runner, is based upon a theory, space travel.

Of course, that is based upon a brief I have that we have no real evidence of space travel in man’s history.

I am convinced man did not go to the moon.

I am convinced that computers preprogrammed according to theories and models, in the 1960s, could calculate that which could barely be seen and mapped.

I do not believe a bank, a whole building, and whole and complete program using archaic computers 60 years ago, could measure distance to the moon.

Furthermore, I have so many questions of things that do not make sense.

Consider this: When diving, one cannot push against the air to change direction. All movement in the air, in flight, basically, is propelled by the force against the board, the diver initiates.

If movement in space cannot be changed by pushing against air. How can it be changed pushing against less than air?

But wait. Air travel is a push against air, so it can be done. But wait. There is no air, we are told by those who theorize, in space.

Who has probed space and reported on the contents? Nobody?

Who has probed the oceans, lakes, rivers and reported on content? It is done, why never done in space?

All theories, again?

Reports and scientific evidence exists, however, for time travel, but not what so-called science and media report.

Reports and scientific evidence exists for weightlessness, but not what so-called science and media report.

Reports and scientific evidence exists for a flat earth, but not what so-called science and media report.

Reports and scientific evidence exists for free energy, but not what so-called science and media report.

Reports and scientific evidence exists for combustion engines operated by water, but not what so-called science and media report.

Reports and scientific evidence exists for combustion engines traveling 80 and more miles per gallon, but not what so-called science and media report. I drove one such car in the 1980s.

Reports and scientific explanations exist for aliens, alien aircraft, but not what so-called science and media report.

Reports and scientific evidence exists for everything in contradiction to assumed theories accepted “realities”, but not what so-called science and media report.

None of this is accomplished except by questioning the so-called reality around you.

I started this with no real direction except to question theory itself. But the biggest theory on my mind as of late, that applies to almost every person in the western world is, do covid-19 vaccines work?

My questions follow:

How is injecting mercury into one’s blood, good for that person?

How is injecting aluminum into an organism good for that organism?

How is injecting formaldehyde?

How does acid in vaccines not breakdown DNA of the bacteria?

How is graphene in covid-19 vaccines good for the body?

Please, take note that I did not question the necessity of stabilizing the vaccine solution. I care not for what purposes poisons are included in vaccines. So what if formaldehyde is used for stabilizing the solution? I am not concerned for the welfare safety and health of the solution. Have you thought about that?

I, we, you, anyone and everyone, could ask questions about everything. One could simply ask why is gravity, for example, still only a theory? Innumerable questions following that could come to the minds of innumerable numbers of people.

So, I ask you why you believe what you believe? I ask you of your beliefs are science or dogma?

I ask you, why have you not questioned what you think you know?

JEFF BOZO BEZOS TRAVELS TO SPACE, FOR A MINUTE

JEFF BOZO BEZOS TRAVELS TO SPACE, FOR A MINUTE

Bozo bezos went into space 7/21/21, no pictures of earth?

Who in his or her right mind would go into space and not take pictures of earth?

What, no windows in “space” craft?

Who would be so stupid to not put a window in a space craft?

The Apollo mission, Apollo 8, took pictures through a window in the craft. Can scientists, engineers and space geniuses not put a window in a launch vessel today?

Everybody knows bozo is a liar. Is this more proof? Did bozo get burned up in the Van Allan Belt? No?

Did NASA forget that the Van Allen Belt is not traversable? How did the astronauts get through in 1969 on their way to the moon? How did the astronauts manage to get to the moon, through the deadly Van Allen Belt, take pictures of the earth through a window, but bozo could not?

Videos abound because NASA forgets.

Here it is, “NASA engineer admits they can’t get past the Van Allen Belt.”

https://duckduckgo.com/?q=van+allen+belt+video&t=h_&iax=videos&ia=videos&iai=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.youtube.com%2Fwatch%3Fv%3D4O5dPsu66Kw

So many bozo can tell us what he was actually doing, and why he had to “go into space” at this particular time, and what he actually did. Why is he misleading the world?