PART 4: “NASA OBSERVATORY RECORDS UNUSUAL ACTIVITY ON THE SUN.”

Lucifer-sam writes, “Space is very big and, often, very weird.” Dufus, liar supreme sam continues, “Last week, an image captured by…”

What is an image?

An image? Captured? How does one capture an imagined non-sequitur?

Even nasa admits, every day, they have no actual photos or reality.

Please, take note that the words image and imagine have the same latin root word and mean, “less than real: circa 1200”, ”a piece of statuary; artificial representation that looks like a person or thing,” Also defined as, “reflection in a mirror” , early 14th century.

So a nasa image is either a reflection, an artificial representation, or less than real, but not real.

So nasa’s theories regarding distances are not real. The distance of one is dependent upon the unreal, artificial distances of others. All are dependent upon unreal, imagined, and superficial distances that not only cannot be substantiated, but cannot substantiate anything claimed to be in association. NOTHING is real.

Imagine means visualizing the unreal, “to create something in one’s mind.”

Not a shred of reality to NASA imagination, but who creates these nothings? Who portrays and depicts and represents these artificial creations? People, or “people” do this.

These image creators and liars are evil people, so devious and degenerate, they cannot be considered people or human.

One can see video, actual film, of rocket lift-offs, burning fuel and fire and brimstone; rockets lifting into the sky, perhaps 10 miles or 20 miles, but the connections of these obvious realities to “space”, is absolutely non-existent, and beyond the unknown distance of the cover of the atmosphere to where “space” begins, nothing is real.

I speculate regarding distances and heights. I am free to speculate because nobody, including nasa has a single measurement for substantiating anything.

Please find something! Find an equation or measurement nasa has measured, applied and used to calculate anything.

There is no film in existence of a rocket lifting into the atmosphere beyond what nasa actually allows to be filmed, and more nothing at heights greater than nasa’s allowances.

This is all luciferian black magic, sleight of hand. The rocket disappears from view and most people assume it goes into “space” because people are told that is what happens.

What is the height a rocket reaches before it is gone from view?

If nasa wanted to convince we the people that a rocket travels to “space”, why not use computer technology to direct a telescope to follow it, and get actual film footage? Because it does not happen as the luciferian liars claim.

Imagine you are beside the track, watching a bobsled pass. For how much time of that whole run of two minutes, do you actually see the bobsled go by?

When rockets are launched, for how long do you see any piece of video, as the rocket passes? Did you notice the “rocket” does not leave the visual? How can that be when it zooms past at miles per second? It is imagery, drawn, fabricated to give classically conditioned minds something to believe: fabrications of faith in nasa’s religion.

Unless you are in a craft, or a video camera is in a craft traveling with or following the rocket image, as shown in the video, a camera attached to a point high in the atmosphere, would see the rocket cross its view for a fraction of a second, not what the video shows. Again, what object traveling with the rocket filmed the video “image” of the rocket burning to “space”?

From :13 to :16, of the animation the rocket stays in view without change. Impossible:

https://www.yahoo.com/news/this-week-in-space-sun-exoplanet-kuiper-belt-154354360.html

Something such as a video camera or CGI animation, follows the so-called rocket into the atmosphere. As film, this video depiction is impossible, as the article states, depiction. Video depiction, as shown, is impossible unless two rockets are launched together, one to film the other.

At highest velocity, the luciferians claim, the rocket escapes the atmosphere traveling 14 miles per second, or 25,200 mph. Doing the math of space theory or atmosphere height theory, where would a video camera need to be to watch a rocket pass it while remaining in view for 4 seconds, without change in size or position? The video is totally bogus, fabricated, imagined and drawn with CGI. That is the only explanation.

Even at an average velocity of only 1/10th the escape velocity of 25,200 mph, the rocket should escape the atmosphere in a matter of seconds, clearly out of range of any constant view for more than a fraction of a second. I am sure one can calculate the velocity derived from so-called force, if one has the thrust measurements of so-called rocket engines.

I am not about to go this deep into the equation, formulae and theorized distance from earth to “space”. You find the equations and measurements nasa claims exist, and report back here. I contend that nothing of the sort exists.

How long does it take for the rocket to reach max velocity, is one question of the whole theory, never shown in full. NEVER!

Even at 1/10th escape velocity of 25,200 mph, it is impossible a rocket could travel without breaking up. You could not even imagine anything traveling at 2,520 mph. The Concorde hit speeds of 1250 mph.

Rockets, we are led to believe, hit maximum speed of 25,200 mph? The acceleration in a 300 to 330 mile window of the atmosphere, would create a g-force that would crush rocks strapped into seats. It is 105 miles per second, according to theory. According to theory, how fast does the world rotate?

Do not forget that the rocket travels at an estimated velocity, not a measured velocity. Nobody, nothing can measure that high speed.

All anybody ever really need do to dissect and thrash stupid nasa, “space” and “globe” theories is to think and ask questions. How do you know that? Can you show me the calculation?

Based on what is that theory or presumption? How does nasa know the escape velocity of any rocket they claim launches into “space”? How then, does nasa know what is needed to escape the atmosphere, and what is the true distance of the height of the atmosphere?

Nothing is known: not a single thing yet magically nasa produces images, depictions and other fake film and photos of disconnected “space”, “space” travel, and moon and sun theorizing.

PART 3: “NASA OBSERVATORY RECORDS UNUSUAL ACTIVITY ON THE SUN.”

Now, finally, open the article, read and watch the animation.

The title of the article reads, “the sun just did something weird, and 3 other space stories you may have missed this week”.

The sun did something weird? How does nature that can only act natural, do something weird? How dumb. How is nature weird? How does the sun, totally untouched and unaffected by earth become weird?

What are the pre-test conditions and data, and post-test conditions, from which nasa makes comparisons to state the sun did something different or weird? Pre-test and post test, science, is absolutely missing from this goofy article. How utterly ridiculous can nasa luciferians get?

The subscript reads, “An oddball new exoplanet, small but significant steps toward the future of spaceflight and a mystery in the Kuiper Belt.”

“Oddball”? Wow, that is so scientific it is scary. What a stupid thing to write. How does a thing without feet step? What stupid clichés can only follow stupid “people”,

A “new exoplanet”? A new planet discovered? “Exo”, as in external? There can only be an “exo” if there is an “endo”, or internal. And what determines ”exo” and “endo”? No comparators, no examples, no parameters or definitions, just stupid words and pieces tossed about to confuse and create education chaos. This is bloody, evil deception.

See how the luciferian liars toss in terms and words that mean nothing so they can sound smart and expert, so they can lie with impunity and control you first with fear and then LAW that follows your response to fear they create.

How much farther from earth than the sun, is this theorized planet?

If all nasa can provide is an animated depiction of the moon from earth, while the sun is even more out of the realm of visual possibility, then a new planet, even more distant than that, cannot be seen or discovered.

How utterly science-retarded can nasa get?

If the sun is impossible to see because the moon is impossible to see, then some crazy, theorized, fabricated, imagined new “exoplanet”, farther away, is absolutely impossible, and absolutely impossible to film or photograph.

The subscript reads, “An oddball new exoplanet… in the Kuiper Belt.”

There is no Kuiper belt because there is no measurement or substantiated distance. There is no relationship of these heavenly bodies therefore they do not exist. The distance to the sun is theorized to be 400 times the distance of the moon from earth, but the distance of moon from earth is not calculated so none of what follows, the whole of globe theory and nasa, is not substantiated and does not exist.

Sure, go ahead, build a house on a pretend foundation, and you don’t have a house, an attic, a garage. You don’t have walls, windows, doors and heat. It is impossible to build something on nothing.

Nasa and globe theory is all so much building on nothing. Show us the calculation of the distance of earth to moon. From that, maybe, one could extrapolate information, a measurement or two, to plug into an equation to calculate something from that foundation. Nothing!

I can line up 3 yard sticks, then four yardsticks at a right angle to the three, and then aim five yardsticks from the end of the three yard sticks to the end of the four yard sticks and create a right angle triangle. This is known as a 3, 4, 5 right triangle. It can be used to create a right angle for building something. You can see it. You can watch the creation of it and how it works. You can see the application of it in making a 90 degree angle out of measurements that can only come together in one way.

There is absolutely nothing of the sort, and less in partiality that lends credibility to anything luciferian nasa fabricates. Show us the one point fixed in space, not “space”, from which other variables are derived, measured and used to calculate anything? Nasa still does not have definitive distance of the end of the atmosphere, or beginning of “space” so the distance of earth to moon is impossibly known.

But, don’t believe me. Look at the animation. Look at the words of the article itself, written, fabricated by science-retard, sam matthews.

These yahoo”NEWS” writers are so dishonest and evil, they do not deserve capitalized names, being liars and devils that deserve no human recognition for their crimes against truth, reality, and humanity.

PART 2: “NASA OBSERVATORY RECORDS UNUSUAL ACTIVITY ON THE SUN.”

PART 2

This “technology” claim that the sun is visible, is as luciferian and completely evil, as anything nasa fabricates.

Find yourself the best camera and see how far it “sees” accurately. Get a telescope and see how far on land it “sees”. And you believe your telescope “sees” planets millions and billions of miles away? How is the light from a planet of such vast distance not completely dissipated?

It is unbelievably arrogant and science-retarded to think light is not dissipated over such vast distances. Even at 93 thousand miles, light is totally dissipated. 930 miles, 93 miles.

They claim they are looking at stars and other heavenly bodies that are millions and billions of miles away. How do they know? How, without a single calculation do they “know” the objects they see are not 200 miles away? They don’t.

Don’t ask why. Evil lies, must lie, and must flip-flop everything, for control.

Their lies are based on their fundamental lies.

Find the world’s most effective telescope, and goofle how far it sees effectively? 93 million miles? Impossible!

The Hubble telescope does not boast it can see the moon, much less the sun. If the Hubble cannot get actual photographs of the moon, it does not see it, and we know it does not see the moon because there exists no photos, only images, composites, drawings and CGI animations and depictions. They just said that.

Go and look for yourselves. when they can only animate and depict, it is an admission that they have no videos or photos of the moon.

Find the specifications of the Hubble telescope and report here.

Can any of the “space” theory goons show us the equation and numbers, with angle for triangulation, that determines the distance any telescope can clearly “see”?

NOPE!

Imagine a telescope can see 1,000 miles. How far is it theorized that “space” begins? Estimates are 300 to 330 miles high is where “space” begins.

Why do telescopes not film “space” walks, satellites, “space” craft?

Film, not CGI; not mystery locations in space where a camera floats and takes photos; film does not exist because the tasks are impossible, and nasa admits it with fake everything.

Why are there no actual videos of a rocket lifting off, and being traced into “space”?

How far away is 93 million miles compared to 300 miles? If that is the best telescope technology can do, and I speculate, having seen no claims of visual contact from any telescope, then it is impossible given current technology, that anything can “see” the surface of the sun.

To see the surface of the sun clearly, one would need to build a telescope that has 93,000 times the resolution of the strongest telescope, based on visual acuity of 1,000 miles. Can these telescopes see across the planet 1,000 miles? Is it not curious that a telescope with apparent accuracy to see 93 million miles does not use that acuity to look across the horizon or into “space” to film satellites and rockets?

You see they, nasa et al, have you convinced that the planets they see in the heavens are millions and billions of miles, or light years away. How does the light from a star billions of light years away not dissipate?

But wait, estimates of moon and sun distances are based on prior estimates, based on nothing, based on gross inadequacies to guess if something is 200 or 200 million miles away. It is all lies. Nobody knows. Nobody has done a calculation. Nobody has a number to inject into an equation.

Telescopes claim they can look into the heavens and see planets at certain theorized distances. There was never a beginning point as to how far these heavenly bodies are so no comparisons can be made with references points that do not exist.

So, “scientists” might estimate the distance of the sun using completely erroneous estimates based on theorized distances of stars or moon. The stars might be only hundreds of miles away, reflections of things in the firmament.

Yes, it is possible there is a firmament, and no such fantasy as “space”. NASA has not filmed or photographed “space”.

If I am in my house, and wonder how cold it is outside, I look out the window and make observations. If I execute a pre-test and see water, and check an hour later to see the same water is freezing, I can theorize the temperature is below freezing. That is a start, observation. There is no starting observable point to nasa fabrications, lies and quackery.

There is no start to “space”; no pre-test; no science.

If I look up and see a star, I wonder what it is and how far away it is. If I have no means to measure the distance of that star, any guess, made popular by repetition, is an imagined guess at best. From that guess used as a benchmark for other distances, the 100% margin of error is multiplied.

I can estimate the sun must surely be closer than the stars, because it is bigger, or appears to be bigger, and that is all. I can theorize and nothing more. That is all NASA has, theory based on theory based on anti-science, anti-trigonometry, imagination. Show us one measurement NASA has ever made to back their guesses.

Theory based on theory based on imagination and fabrication could provide a margin of error of thousands or millions percent. No distance of any heavenly body has ever been calculated.

In reality, there is no proof that the strongest telescope “sees” farther than 300 to 330 miles, so the required magnification of the best current visual is actually 310,000 times more than we have.

I do not believe, in the least that nasa can see 1,000 miles much less 9,300 times that distance. You can believe that if you decide to believe the objects you see in the sky are the distances NASA and globe-theory imagine and perpetually repeat.

The sun must be 93 million miles away because we know the moon is 238,000 miles away, but the moon might only be 100 miles away. Nobody knows because nobody can produce an equation to measure that distance, and nobody has a single shred of data.

For all “science” knows the moon might be farther away, and bigger.

Go ahead, believe their claims and distances. Worst, believe liars are not lying to you that they know these things when they have absolutely nothing but planned deception to make you think something is known: that they are smarter than you.

Can you find information that shows how nasa technology does it? Can you find an actual photo of the moon that is not an image, a composite, a representation, drawing, CGI for animated depiction? How do you expect then, to find an actual photo of the surface of the sun? Again, can you explain, show, or prove the distance in any equation” Or, can you provide a reference to an equation measurement, or reference point in space or on earth from which extrapolations of distances can be calculated?

That image, a piece of a “footage” is a fabrication, a lie. Even nasa states it is an image and not a photo.

IMPOSSIBLE NASA/YAHOO”NEWS”, FEBRUARY 11, 2023, “NASA OBSERVATORY RECORDS UNUSUAL ACTIVITY ON THE SUN.”

The sub script to the headline reads, “Other space highlights from the week”

Upon opening the following is the article:

https://www.yahoo.com/news/this-week-in-space-sun-exoplanet-kuiper-belt-154354360.html

It is almost comical that fake, NASA science can see 93 million miles.

93,000 miles is impossible, and much less 1,000 times as much, 93,000,000 miles.

You must understand that just because we can see sunlight coming to us from theorized distance, does not mean we can see the distance of 93 million miles? It is theory that the sun is 93 million miles away. You must surely recognize the distance is not proved, formulated, or equated. No?

Can you find one measurement by NASA or globe theory that injects one number into an equation that measures, by triangulation, for example, the distance of the sun from the earth?

How do you measure distance? You walk it, drive it, or use triangulation to measure known variables and then use constants to calculate.

How else could someone determine the distance except by one or another equation or formula? It is impossible to look straight at an object even 93 yards away, and determine distance, and even more bizarre to think someone or something can look straight on and determine a distance over i.760 billion times greater.

When the guesstimate was made, did a survey transit with the capacity to measure a distance of 93 million miles exist? How about 93 miles, 9.3 miles?

Does such a survey instrument exist today?

How, anywhere in any realm of science, can a single eye, uni-vision of a telescope look straight on and determine the distance of any object? Do telescopes measure height of shadows cast by one planet on another?

The scenarios for guess and speculating are ludicrous, and anyone who thinks someone is telling any bit of truth when they speculate these ridiculous theories, is living in near-absolute ignorance.

Suppose you can see from one town to the next, can you look down the road and determine the distance? Can you do it better with a telescope or binoculars? No, it is worse with a telescope.

Can you look at your odometer and see the numbers click as you drive? How did the auto manufacturers derive a correct measure and place it in mechanism of an odometer?

It starts with a smaller measurement, the length of a foot and yard.

We know a certain number of feet and/or yards makes a mile. We could walk that distance with a wheel on a stick with a counter and use geometry with the measure of the circumference to determine distance.

We could look at a tower from one town to another, measure with a protractor the angle of ascent, and inject the known height of the tower to calculate the distance. It is all built upon measurements, equations and calculations.

For distance to the sun, or moon, or clouds, there is no measurement, not one, no equations ever used and nothing exists to be calculated. There is nothing, not a shred of data in existence to determine almost everything nasa and globe-theory pretend-science claims.

Not knowing the angle of ascent or the height of the tower, could anyone look straight at the pinnacle of the tower and know the distance along the level to the base? No! A million guesses might put someone close, but do it now for something hundreds of miles away. Impossible, and absolutely impossible for just the distance of the moon.

Please, globe-theory believers, show us the equation and numbers, used to determine the distance of the sun from earth.

Oh wait, it is based on other distances of planets. From what measurements, equations and calculations are these distances derived? None: all speculation and fabrication as well?

Make it easy, show us the measurements, angle and equation used to measure the distance of the moon from earth, 238,000 miles. Even NASA only shows an animated representation. Do your own goofle search. The search I found claims one can see the distance from earth to moon in an “animated depiction”.

Animated? Depiction? Drawings with numbers drawn, done in CGI? If nasa can only show the distance of the moon in an animated depiction, a cartoon, how on earth can anyone believe nasa can see the surface of the sun, according to theory, 390 times as far?

Again, not a single measurement or shred of data exists.

Now notice the image of this “sun” is quite detailed, according to animation, cartoon, drawing, CGI. It is a depiction, not video. From what is the depiction derived if there is no visual? It is imagined, a lie. From whose mind did this imagination come? I believe the surface of the sun looks like Kamala harris’ cheese face. I imagine it, and now I CGI it. How stupid can NASA get to think their whacko theories and imaginations fool people.

D’oh, they fool some.

If the depiction drives from a photo or video clip, why not publish the photo or video clip? Is the answer obvious to you? There is no reality to the imagined pretense. There is absolutely no reality to any visual of the sun.

Please take note that it is two very different things to see the sun’s rays lighting up the world, but quite another thing to see the surface of the sun. It is one thing to feel warmth coming from some unknown distance, but it is impossible for mankind to develop a camera or instrument of any kind, to see the sun, 93 million, 93,000,000 miles away,

NEWS REPORT TRIVIA, DECEMBER 15 2021: WE WENT TO THE MOON IN SPACE SHIPS WITH LESS TECHNOLOGY THAN VEHICLES HAVE TODAY. NO WAY!

Has anyone gone back and looked at the computers used in the space program of the 1960s? Not only is it archaic but if it is true that those computers were less tchnologilly capable than vehicles today there is no way they could respond fast enough for a trip around th corner to the grocery store.

Have you ever watched th computer geeks at the command posts, as they worked, apparently worked? They do nothing. What are they working on? Were they using Pascal, rotunda or caveman programming?

For gawd’s sake, there is nothing they could do while a so-called space ship was in flight. How slow would those computers have been? An abacus would have been faster.

The speed of computation could not have been ay faster than personal computers of the 1990s and early 2000s, slow.

Two variables to consider: how fast was data gathered while those nerds sat at those boxes, and how fast could a caveman computer translate the data and by what programs was data acquired and interpreted?

You will find no answers because the mute, colluding corrupt media was in in the scam.

Take your first cell phone out of retire, text a few sentences, go to the internet, wait for it, wait for it….oh yeah, forgot, not 5G, or 4G, or 1G. It was bits per second, analog, not wireless or fiber.

It must have been a hell of a long telecommunications cable going from the NASA command center and following that space craft as it left orbit and wrapped around the earth a few times on its way to the :moon”.

How did they communicate with the space craft, radio waves? Too slow. How fast does sound travel in a ir? How fast does sound travel in a vacuum? How fast does radio wave travel in air? How fast in a vacuum? Does it?

I do not know, I am asking.

Has everybody forgotten? It was NASA that created space flight then and it is NASA fabricating global warming today.

Take a look at the scientific paper I have included for your sensory bombardment.

I was in the labs in my university eduction. Every lab experience, every experiment, every investigation at the library into prior studies and experiments, began with an outline, description of the study and/or experiment. Every single study and experiment had a hypothesis, a mode of collection of data, parameters for collating and interpreting data, and a means of connecting the intended data to a predetermined effect of defined and isolated causes. Cause and effect was clearly identified, defined, and organized.

We have never seen a shred from NASA.

Today we are bombarded with effects and solutions taken from absolutely nothing resembling cause, stimulus, data, measurements or predetermined collation methodology.

There was absolutely nothing in the aluminum foil days of the LM of Apollo 11, 12 13. Three trips to the moon with landings, organized and directed by nerdy geeks on computers with less power than your watch today. IMPOSSIBLE!

We are being grotesquely and grossly manipulated, deceived, exploited and discarded.

NASA, IPCC, NOAH, WMO, AAAS, and others are all void of cause, data, measurements, but they all offer up effects without connection to their stated causes. There must be data, pre and post testing, isolation of a variable to test and hypothesized variable. Never do we see a control group of control data. NEVER! How is solution possible without cause? Impossible!

THEORY BASED ON THEORY IS STILL ONLY THEORY AND NOT REALITY

Theory based on theory is still only theory and not reality.

I watched a video of someone talking about time travel and how it was related to the use of black holes. Has anyone seen a black hole?

Seriously, has anyone been to a black hole? Has anyone actually seen a black hole by looking into the sky?

Who has claimed to have seen a black hole?

Who has seen a flux capacitor? Who has seen a spaceship?

Who has taken a picture of the earth from the heavens?

Why no pictures?

We were shown a picture of the earth through a window in 1969, so the story, from a so-called expert, goes.

If “they” could put a window in a spaceship then it can be done now, so surely there must be a window in all the rockets launched since. What would it take to place an automated camera in position to take pictures?

You can find videos that debunk the 1969 earth picture as a drawing behind a window in a dark room.

Incidentally, it is the same picture of the earth we are shown all the time.

Now, before you go crazy, yes, you, not me myself; before you go off your deep end writing words in your mind I have not written, stop.

Did I, myself, say I was a flat-earther or are you saying it? Did I say I did not believe in science, as I pound keys on my laptop, or are you going to extrapolate an irrefutably stupid conclusion from the opposite of evidence?

Has anyone proved gravity is what “science” theorizes? Yes, gravity is still a theory.

I look at water as it pours from a faucet. Have you noticed that water in many instances separates as it drops. I am not talking about spray. I have not theorized regarding water not falling directly “down”.

If water separates there must be a force to push strands of water from each other. Is that, perhaps, the same force that drags water down?

So, am I anti-science or just wondering about what theory of gravity is correct or close? Do you feel a need to attack me for wondering? Are you experiencing fear regarding your beliefs because I, myself, wonder? I do not have fears in wondering; wondering about anything. I can switch my views according to reality. Can you?

I was quite involved in religion many years ago. I believed the Bible to be the word of god and believed in a supreme being and, in fact three deities, God the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit.

My belief system was tied to a belief in the originator and origination of the sect.

My belief system included a belief that Jesus, the Christ, was the source of mankind’s conscience. I believed that to deny conscience, the source, would make a man drift towards anti-social disordered behavior: psychopathy or sociopathy.

But my belief system was undermined by some revelations and my research, and I totally quit that religion.

I completely gave up belief in a supreme being when I discovered that I controlled my conscience and my commitment to living by conscience was connected o my desire to remain a decent human being. Of course some will challenge, based on their hate-motivated, fear-originated ignorance, not mine.

For 16 years I was a non-believer in God.

Lately, however, I wonder, again.

Too many coincidences and study of the sources themselves of alternate theories, regarding the earth, history and the mind have prompted me to wonder, again, if there is some order to this world.

I have constantly called the theory of relativity into question. It is a mathematical theory, you do realize? Who, of the many people you know, has travelled at the speed of light? Nobody?

Do you remember a day when science theorized that to travel in a vehicle faster than 50 miles per hour one’s head would explode? You don’t remember that?

Do you remember a day when doctors made house calls and prescribed herbs? Do you remember a day when there were no such food additives and drugs, and chemicals in humanity’s lives?

Do you recall ads describing smoking as good? Do you remember the pilgrims coming to America with large lumbering cows, or did they bring goats?

No matter what Newton called it, an apple fell from a tree, he observed it, and gave it a name. Somehow gravity stuck.

What is the latinate root of the word gravity?

Latinate gravitatem, gravitas means weight, heaviness, pressure, from the root gravis, heavy.

What started this ponderance is still a theory, time travel.

All the science fiction movies, most of them absolutely stupid, are based upon theories, and that is it.

Even my favorite sci-fi, Blade Runner, is based upon a theory, space travel.

Of course, that is based upon a brief I have that we have no real evidence of space travel in man’s history.

I am convinced man did not go to the moon.

I am convinced that computers preprogrammed according to theories and models, in the 1960s, could calculate that which could barely be seen and mapped.

I do not believe a bank, a whole building, and whole and complete program using archaic computers 60 years ago, could measure distance to the moon.

Furthermore, I have so many questions of things that do not make sense.

Consider this: When diving, one cannot push against the air to change direction. All movement in the air, in flight, basically, is propelled by the force against the board, the diver initiates.

If movement in space cannot be changed by pushing against air. How can it be changed pushing against less than air?

But wait. Air travel is a push against air, so it can be done. But wait. There is no air, we are told by those who theorize, in space.

Who has probed space and reported on the contents? Nobody?

Who has probed the oceans, lakes, rivers and reported on content? It is done, why never done in space?

All theories, again?

Reports and scientific evidence exists, however, for time travel, but not what so-called science and media report.

Reports and scientific evidence exists for weightlessness, but not what so-called science and media report.

Reports and scientific evidence exists for a flat earth, but not what so-called science and media report.

Reports and scientific evidence exists for free energy, but not what so-called science and media report.

Reports and scientific evidence exists for combustion engines operated by water, but not what so-called science and media report.

Reports and scientific evidence exists for combustion engines traveling 80 and more miles per gallon, but not what so-called science and media report. I drove one such car in the 1980s.

Reports and scientific explanations exist for aliens, alien aircraft, but not what so-called science and media report.

Reports and scientific evidence exists for everything in contradiction to assumed theories accepted “realities”, but not what so-called science and media report.

None of this is accomplished except by questioning the so-called reality around you.

I started this with no real direction except to question theory itself. But the biggest theory on my mind as of late, that applies to almost every person in the western world is, do covid-19 vaccines work?

My questions follow:

How is injecting mercury into one’s blood, good for that person?

How is injecting aluminum into an organism good for that organism?

How is injecting formaldehyde?

How does acid in vaccines not breakdown DNA of the bacteria?

How is graphene in covid-19 vaccines good for the body?

Please, take note that I did not question the necessity of stabilizing the vaccine solution. I care not for what purposes poisons are included in vaccines. So what if formaldehyde is used for stabilizing the solution? I am not concerned for the welfare safety and health of the solution. Have you thought about that?

I, we, you, anyone and everyone, could ask questions about everything. One could simply ask why is gravity, for example, still only a theory? Innumerable questions following that could come to the minds of innumerable numbers of people.

So, I ask you why you believe what you believe? I ask you of your beliefs are science or dogma?

I ask you, why have you not questioned what you think you know?