Tag: matthews

PART 4: “NASA OBSERVATORY RECORDS UNUSUAL ACTIVITY ON THE SUN.”

Lucifer-sam writes, “Space is very big and, often, very weird.” Dufus, liar supreme sam continues, “Last week, an image captured by…”

What is an image?

An image? Captured? How does one capture an imagined non-sequitur?

Even nasa admits, every day, they have no actual photos or reality.

Please, take note that the words image and imagine have the same latin root word and mean, “less than real: circa 1200”, ”a piece of statuary; artificial representation that looks like a person or thing,” Also defined as, “reflection in a mirror” , early 14th century.

So a nasa image is either a reflection, an artificial representation, or less than real, but not real.

So nasa’s theories regarding distances are not real. The distance of one is dependent upon the unreal, artificial distances of others. All are dependent upon unreal, imagined, and superficial distances that not only cannot be substantiated, but cannot substantiate anything claimed to be in association. NOTHING is real.

Imagine means visualizing the unreal, “to create something in one’s mind.”

Not a shred of reality to NASA imagination, but who creates these nothings? Who portrays and depicts and represents these artificial creations? People, or “people” do this.

These image creators and liars are evil people, so devious and degenerate, they cannot be considered people or human.

One can see video, actual film, of rocket lift-offs, burning fuel and fire and brimstone; rockets lifting into the sky, perhaps 10 miles or 20 miles, but the connections of these obvious realities to “space”, is absolutely non-existent, and beyond the unknown distance of the cover of the atmosphere to where “space” begins, nothing is real.

I speculate regarding distances and heights. I am free to speculate because nobody, including nasa has a single measurement for substantiating anything.

Please find something! Find an equation or measurement nasa has measured, applied and used to calculate anything.

There is no film in existence of a rocket lifting into the atmosphere beyond what nasa actually allows to be filmed, and more nothing at heights greater than nasa’s allowances.

This is all luciferian black magic, sleight of hand. The rocket disappears from view and most people assume it goes into “space” because people are told that is what happens.

What is the height a rocket reaches before it is gone from view?

If nasa wanted to convince we the people that a rocket travels to “space”, why not use computer technology to direct a telescope to follow it, and get actual film footage? Because it does not happen as the luciferian liars claim.

Imagine you are beside the track, watching a bobsled pass. For how much time of that whole run of two minutes, do you actually see the bobsled go by?

When rockets are launched, for how long do you see any piece of video, as the rocket passes? Did you notice the “rocket” does not leave the visual? How can that be when it zooms past at miles per second? It is imagery, drawn, fabricated to give classically conditioned minds something to believe: fabrications of faith in nasa’s religion.

Unless you are in a craft, or a video camera is in a craft traveling with or following the rocket image, as shown in the video, a camera attached to a point high in the atmosphere, would see the rocket cross its view for a fraction of a second, not what the video shows. Again, what object traveling with the rocket filmed the video “image” of the rocket burning to “space”?

From :13 to :16, of the animation the rocket stays in view without change. Impossible:

https://www.yahoo.com/news/this-week-in-space-sun-exoplanet-kuiper-belt-154354360.html

Something such as a video camera or CGI animation, follows the so-called rocket into the atmosphere. As film, this video depiction is impossible, as the article states, depiction. Video depiction, as shown, is impossible unless two rockets are launched together, one to film the other.

At highest velocity, the luciferians claim, the rocket escapes the atmosphere traveling 14 miles per second, or 25,200 mph. Doing the math of space theory or atmosphere height theory, where would a video camera need to be to watch a rocket pass it while remaining in view for 4 seconds, without change in size or position? The video is totally bogus, fabricated, imagined and drawn with CGI. That is the only explanation.

Even at an average velocity of only 1/10th the escape velocity of 25,200 mph, the rocket should escape the atmosphere in a matter of seconds, clearly out of range of any constant view for more than a fraction of a second. I am sure one can calculate the velocity derived from so-called force, if one has the thrust measurements of so-called rocket engines.

I am not about to go this deep into the equation, formulae and theorized distance from earth to “space”. You find the equations and measurements nasa claims exist, and report back here. I contend that nothing of the sort exists.

How long does it take for the rocket to reach max velocity, is one question of the whole theory, never shown in full. NEVER!

Even at 1/10th escape velocity of 25,200 mph, it is impossible a rocket could travel without breaking up. You could not even imagine anything traveling at 2,520 mph. The Concorde hit speeds of 1250 mph.

Rockets, we are led to believe, hit maximum speed of 25,200 mph? The acceleration in a 300 to 330 mile window of the atmosphere, would create a g-force that would crush rocks strapped into seats. It is 105 miles per second, according to theory. According to theory, how fast does the world rotate?

Do not forget that the rocket travels at an estimated velocity, not a measured velocity. Nobody, nothing can measure that high speed.

All anybody ever really need do to dissect and thrash stupid nasa, “space” and “globe” theories is to think and ask questions. How do you know that? Can you show me the calculation?

Based on what is that theory or presumption? How does nasa know the escape velocity of any rocket they claim launches into “space”? How then, does nasa know what is needed to escape the atmosphere, and what is the true distance of the height of the atmosphere?

Nothing is known: not a single thing yet magically nasa produces images, depictions and other fake film and photos of disconnected “space”, “space” travel, and moon and sun theorizing.

PART 3: “NASA OBSERVATORY RECORDS UNUSUAL ACTIVITY ON THE SUN.”

Now, finally, open the article, read and watch the animation.

The title of the article reads, “the sun just did something weird, and 3 other space stories you may have missed this week”.

The sun did something weird? How does nature that can only act natural, do something weird? How dumb. How is nature weird? How does the sun, totally untouched and unaffected by earth become weird?

What are the pre-test conditions and data, and post-test conditions, from which nasa makes comparisons to state the sun did something different or weird? Pre-test and post test, science, is absolutely missing from this goofy article. How utterly ridiculous can nasa luciferians get?

The subscript reads, “An oddball new exoplanet, small but significant steps toward the future of spaceflight and a mystery in the Kuiper Belt.”

“Oddball”? Wow, that is so scientific it is scary. What a stupid thing to write. How does a thing without feet step? What stupid clichés can only follow stupid “people”, 

A “new exoplanet”? A new planet discovered? “Exo”, as in external? There can only be an “exo” if there is an “endo”, or internal. And what determines ”exo” and “endo”? No comparators, no examples, no parameters or definitions, just stupid words and pieces tossed about to confuse and create education chaos. This is bloody, evil deception.

See how the luciferian liars toss in terms and words that mean nothing so they can sound smart and expert, so they can lie with impunity and control you first with fear and then LAW that follows your response to fear they create.

How much farther from earth than the sun, is this theorized planet?

If all nasa can provide is an animated depiction of the moon from earth, while the sun is even more out of the realm of visual possibility, then a new planet, even more distant than that, cannot be seen or discovered.

How utterly science-retarded can nasa get?

If the sun is impossible to see because the moon is impossible to see, then some crazy, theorized, fabricated, imagined new “exoplanet”, farther away, is absolutely impossible, and absolutely impossible to film or photograph.

The subscript reads, “An oddball new exoplanet… in the Kuiper Belt.”

There is no Kuiper belt because there is no measurement or substantiated distance. There is no relationship of these heavenly bodies therefore they do not exist. The distance to the sun is theorized to be 400 times the distance of the moon from earth, but the distance of moon from earth is not calculated so none of what follows, the whole of globe theory and nasa, is not substantiated and does not exist.

Sure, go ahead, build a house on a pretend foundation, and you don’t have a house, an attic, a garage. You don’t have walls, windows, doors and heat. It is impossible to build something on nothing.

Nasa and globe theory is all so much building on nothing. Show us the calculation of the distance of earth to moon. From that, maybe, one could extrapolate information, a measurement or two, to plug into an equation to calculate something from that foundation. Nothing!

I can line up 3 yard sticks, then four yardsticks at a right angle to the three, and then aim five yardsticks from the end of the three yard sticks to the end of the four yard sticks and create a right angle triangle. This is known as a 3, 4, 5 right triangle. It can be used to create a right angle for building something. You can see it. You can watch the creation of it and how it works. You can see the application of it in making a 90 degree angle out of measurements that can only come together in one way.

There is absolutely nothing of the sort, and less in partiality that lends credibility to anything luciferian nasa fabricates. Show us the one point fixed in space, not “space”, from which other variables are derived, measured and used to calculate anything? Nasa still does not have definitive distance of the end of the atmosphere, or beginning of “space” so the distance of earth to moon is impossibly known.

But, don’t believe me. Look at the animation. Look at the words of the article itself, written, fabricated by science-retard, sam matthews.

These yahoo”NEWS” writers are so dishonest and evil, they do not deserve capitalized names, being liars and devils that deserve no human recognition for their crimes against truth, reality, and humanity.