Tag: marxism

DAILY GARBAGE “NEWS” FROM YAHOO.COM, DEC 7TH, 2021

More garbage “NEWS from yahoo.COM

Yahoo published a piece on December 6th 2021, the headline read, “Vaccine scientist issues warning about the next pandemic.”

Where is this issue? Is it only “issued” by yahoo after yahoo went shopping for someone who would support fear of more pandemic; pandemic that does not exist by definition? How is more of something possible when the something does not exist? 

By definition there was no and is no pandemic. Cases mean nothing. For every “covid” case reported there were 20 “flu” cases. Flu kills, correct? Is there a “flu” pandemic? Yes, but nobody is counting flu cases because we are accustomed to the “flu”. More accurately, we are accustomed to flu symptoms.

Cases means nothing, it is nothing, it represents nothing and results in nothing except lockdown, which is political.

The article continues, “U.K. professor Sarah Gilbert is warning that the next pandemic may (be) more contagious and lethal unless more money is devoted to research and preparations to fight emerging viral threats.”

Are you you not sick of being manipulated with maybes and politics , spend your money on her/their research and outrageous incomes?

Let us look at the just the headline. Yahoo searched, found and edified someone who makes money doing what she advocates. In the least, it is a conflict of interest, again, as always, in favor of the political class.

How about this headline, “Vaccine scientist issues warning about vaccine, her specialty”?

Or this one, “ Virologist issues warning that viruses may infect humans, and kill some.“ The redundancy of reality is trumped by the goons of fear mongering tyranny.

Do you understand that yahoo searched until they found a compliant, political agent, and then lied. Sarah Gilbert made no such “issue”. She was loosely, by media trickery, recruited to say what the political egoists of the corrupt media wanted said. Ahgoo admits it in the article. Gilbert responded to a yahoo search for fear.

How about this subscript, “U.K. professor Sarah Gilbert refused to respond to yahoo questions in a field of study outside of her expertise”?

The super-subscript claims, someone “said”, “Advances made ‘must not be lost’ “

Do you see the disconnect. Someone at yahoo wrote, “Advances made”.

Then someone paraphrased with paraphrase marks (‘ ‘) a fake connection with the next part, “ ‘must not be lost’ “

Do you see how they mess with reality and truth, right before your eyes?

And… what gains? Who says we, or anyone outside of the political class made gains? What gains did your child make in learning how to read? You can teach your child.

Coincidentally, it takes about 100 hours to learn to read, and then the world is open to grand discovery and growth. Why do schools spend so much time teaching anything but reading and math? Even the hard sciences need not be taught if scientific methodology is taught.

School could be two years. Math and application of math in the sciences is one topic. Math can used to show application in physics, chemistry, calculus (hate it), biology, physiology. Levering is math. Physics is math.

Reading is the precursor to everything, not politics. Do the school systems want politicians of all or do they want learning, growing, intellectual beings?

Wait, did I just expose what the school systems are doing to our children?

How many politicians do we need? From tyranny’s perspective everyone needs to think in terms of the rulers’ lives, laws and exploits, from the perspective of submission and fealty to the rulers. Of course they use different, endearing terms and words. The bolshevik movement, for example, is alive and ravaging in America. They call themselves progressives. Others also refer to them as progressives. Some call them leftists, which means nothing, really. Left is ethereal and unidentifiable to the  masses who cannot see cause and effect because scientific methodology has not been taught: in fact scientific methodology, applied in every aspect and decision of every single person’s life, has been purposefully ignored and the principles of it have been negated.

Observation and then surmise, referred to in scientific terms as theorize and predict, when pressed for, of all things, data, real data or actual measurements, has been replaced with fear and manipulation, lockdown from information and blatant suppression of existing systems of production and delivery: the free market.

The bolsheviks of the 20th century are responsible for the deaths of an estimated 100 million people. Bolshevism, not marxism, not socialism, infected and slaughtered the Chinese in the same fashion and ruthless slaughter of resitance, in China by Mao. Anyone can argue against, and I accept. My point is bolshevism is vastly more ruthless and dangerous than anything the cowardly “right wing” goons call left-wing tyranny. Furthest left is bolshevism, and we are there now.

The dementocrats have imprisoned numerous protestors for trespassing on their property. The whitehouse, the whole of government belongs to the U.S. Government, not the Government of the United States of America. Do you see it?

Look around you. Everywhere you go, you see the red white and blue, OUR flag representing OUR country.

But everywhere in the halls and offices and courthouses you see their flag: the gold fringed flag of the U.S. Government, ruling all judicial and political forums. The gold tassels represent an “at war” status. With whom, do you suppose the United States Government is at war?

The yahoo article itself, written by a goon reporter, Danica Kirka, another nobody liar who shows up from seemingly nowhere, to provide another voice for the totalitarian lockdowns..

I will continue the slaughter of liars’ words and manipulation, as found in Danica’s fabrications, later.

RUTHLESS DEPRAVITY AND GENOCIDE LOST IN NICE WORDS SUCH AS DEMOCRACY, COMMUNISM, PROGRESSIVE AND SOCIALISM

May I just communicate something, that socialism is not the problem. There is nothing social about socialism. There is nothing community oriented about communism, even though both have the same latinate roots. There is nothing progressive about progressivism. All these isms have roots in Marxism and bolshevism which can be traced to Eastern Europe influenced by Khazaria, lost in the poor records of centuries of tyranny and depravity. I have studied, researched, read the ancients and sages, and will not go into gory, devilish details. Democracy, socialism, progressivism and communism are all attempts to hide sick, twisted ruthless genocide in nice words, propagated by marxist bolsheviks.

THE DEMOCRACY FRAUD HAS TENTACLES OF DECEPTION THAT MOST PEOPLE HAVE ACCEPTED AS TRUTH AND REALITY.

Did you, dear democrat voter, know there is a difference between self-governing and democracy, and that you have been deceived? You have been tricked into thinking non-servants, self-serving democracy mongers provide representation?

War, big or small; such as an invading army or one person stealing from another, is deception and those who deceive, especially in bold proactivity, are undeniably waged in war against those they deceive. Who is deceiving you? Are you sure? Have you gone to the sources of things, reports and “news”? Who has deceived you all along that democracy is representation? Is the party that bears the name of the deception the party that deceives you? Is it a party or people that deceive?

If you believe the stories of the dem/lib political-media machine, “democracy at work”, for example, then you have not looked for truth. Someone is waging war against you and I, but you refuse to see that the claims and democracy memes are lies. Are you afraid to look?

Are you afraid to look at the fist flying at your face? He or she, or it, who lies to you is throwing a punch. Are you afraid to see it? Will you ignore it so it does not hit you? How smart is that?

Deception is war, war is deception. Deception is part of war, large and small scale, and it is used to deceive for two main purposes. War, deception is used to flip-flop justice and injustice: making the innocent pay and giving impunity to evil and criminal activists.

Deception’s other role is to trick fools who fail to find truth, into working for evil, sacrificing their own safety and lives for the gain of democratic self-serving, anti-representation frauds and thieves. Are you sure you want to associate with thieves; thieves who lie to you and have been lying all along; whose goal is to use you and ravage your wealth and resources?

A simple reality: every democrat politician, and you can argue the same of republican politicians to a lesser number, makes money in “public service”, except one. You must accept; you should judge accordingly and you cannot refute the charitable nature of President Trump donating his presidential income. For some strange reason, the dem/lib, progressive/bolshevik media continually blasts “NEWS” to distract you, the public, from that single most revealing truth.

President Trump, unlike political profiteering democrats, such as Obamas, Pelosi, Schumer, Clintons, all of them, is not jaded with a pursuit of wealth. If that were the case with any republican or independent, all dem/libs and the media would have tried to make that claim. Republicans and conservatives would have acknowledged it, and it would have factored into their thinking and policies. But that wishful, fairy tale would never have arisen because politics, as opposed to representation, attracts the political ravishers to one party. Democrats get rich in office, by graft and corruption especially. Is this unbelievable? Why don’t you find out for yourself? Why not find your  freedom from ignorance and manipulation? Trump’s wealth before office and after reveals a loss. Pelosi’s wealth before and after reveals questions of how a limited income produces scores of millions of dollars. Can you fathom that your ignorance was organized against you, and you fell for it because of one thing: you were convinced that someone else could steal from your neighbors and fellow citizens, in a fair manner, and add profit and success to your life without affecting others. You refusal to look and see the fist coming at your face was only the beginning. Legitimate, neighborly  theft, through pretentious government taxation and oppressive programming and registration, is a fist directed at you primarily, to gain your fealty, inability to break free, and then your demise in war serving the political elite: those who have become rich through politics.

Can you follow this new and reversed perspective? Will you acknowledge that it is possible, given that President Trump, is not doing this presidential thing for financial gain? Surely you can find media that reports he has gained financially through his position, but if it were true, considering all the liberal judges that have overturned his constitutionally-oriented efforts, would there not be at least one who would actually file charges with the courts? Yet, nothing except unbacked accusations deflecting and deceiving you. 

Not a thing, a failed impeachment, and he has the advantage of ten times the numbers showing up at rallies. Does all this not, in the least, reveal one variable in this massive equation of which you have not heard? If you have not seen buses of latinos and blacks going to the polls, election after election, are you sure they are voting democrat? How can you know for sure? You simply cannot know, but you can know one thing: the apparent; the obvious; the visual; the numerical; the irrefutably observable superiority in rally turnouts boldly blasts that support for President Trump is massive; far greater than a small fraction elsewhere.

How, rationally, can you dispute that reality? If you think you can, and you try, are you lying to yourself? Are you convinced, as the dem/lib media has proclaimed, that two plus two is five? Is it possible that a five or 20 to one ratio of rally supporters equals more voter turnout for democrats? That flip-flop of reality is just what dem/libs and progressive/bolsheviks have been trying to poison you with.

Both “sides” claim the other side is lying, deceptive and fraudulent. Both could be deceptive but one surely is. If one is then perhaps the other “side” is not. Do you know? A simple test for you to judge who is lying to you is to answer the question, what is America’s political system. If you are dem/lib and have not researched this; have not read the Constitution or your Bill of Rights, do not be surprised to discover you have been lied to and live in a hate-motivated fantasy.

It would serve your freedom well to read “The Federalist Papers” to know why the founding fathers despised and rejected democracy for the fraud it is.

You see, now, here is the point. Someone has been lying to you for, maybe, your whole life. You thought all along that America was a democracy when it is not. Who has misled you to believe that, and why?

Both “sides” point fingers, you believe, that the other side is lying. It matters not what side makes that claim correctly. This is about you. Do you want to be ruled by those who lie to you?

The “conservative” and republic-oriented talk show hosts, everyone of them, to my amazement, cannot believe the democrats are so dumb to persist in their radical socialist narratives, thinking the democrat politicians must be whacky to think they are going to win the election when insulting and abandoning the democrat base. I cannot believe there are conservatives or republicans, who have known of democrat lies and deception, for years and decades, who think the democrat politicians are just out of touch or so full of hate for one man they are blinded to all Americans. But, this is not about talk show and television hosts. My astonishment is that those we think understand the realities of the contentions in politics/representation believe the media is suddenly, mysteriously telling truth bout anything, especially the reality that the democrats have already cheated their way into office.

The democrats have already, in their minds, won the election(s) because they have cheating aces up their sleeves. The attacks, and bravado belies more of the deception, that of distraction. It worked.

My assessment is that President Trump is aware that democrats have cheating done for them, and he has taken steps to insure he arrests and curtails cheating against him. He, hwoever, has no authority over any other political engineering. I believe President Trump will win while democrats take more seats in the house, and possibly the senate.

This scenario provides the perfect set up for the progressives, the international bolsheviks. It gives them control over both “sides”, allowing democracy to apparently flourish, while giving the vast majority a token representation and appearance of representation in the form of one representative, the President.

Do not be confused. Bolshevism is not communism or socialism, and none of the three serve mankind. See my essay on “IF IT SUSPENDS RIGHTS LIKE A BOLSHEVIK; IF IT ATTACKS SMALL BUSINESS LIKE A BOLSHEVIK; IT IS A BOLSHEVIK”.

Many conservatives and republic-oriented Americans think Americans will reject the bombastic, blatant tyranny of the democrat party and liberal media. This is not the fight. The fight goes where the deception diverts it and, more important, from the subversive efforts to steal the election.

I slap myself every time I hear one of them claim the democrats are going to lose because the democrat party has no policy, no sentient candidate, a hated vice presidential candidate in Kamala, and democrat-controlled states and cities are broke, burning and in ruins. I feel slivers of contempt and despair when I hear the big guns of talk radio claim the democrats are so dumb for alienating the democrat base, they are going to be slaughtered in the election. Then they express fear that the democrats will win because the polls show unbelievable wins for biden.

I get angry when these same talk show experts try to interpret fraudulent polls from liars they have known for years are liars.

The democrats have already won, like they did in the last election. They took six congressional seats in California, after they were won by republicans. Six representatives were removed and six self-serving, un-representative democrats were installed. Six seats of representation were stolen away from We, the People by deception, deflection and distraction that had been entrenched years prior in deep-state, politics-as-usual, subversive control.

This idea I have contemplated for four years, that President Trump is the lone star president, of little capacity, comes from 

Suppose you are standing 200 feet from a cliff, and a supposed friend calls you to make that move to the edge, to join him or her. Don’t worry, he or she claims, let us come together on this issue for the time being. You need not worry about the move because compromise is good for both, and you will still remain so fr from the edge, you indubitably are not in a difficult position.

Ok, you make the compromise and move from 200 feet from the edge to 100 feet from the edge.

Next week another so-called friend and ally calls you to compromise. You accede and find yourself still far from the edge at 50 feet.

A Third and fourth call to compromise and you are 12.5 feet from the edge.

Will you now compromise again, leaving you a trip-and-fall death at six feet from the edge?

Your first mistake was to compromise with a known liar.

We, most Americans, know democrats and the liberal media continually lie. Many deceptions are all related to one basic fraud. America is not a democracy.

The democracy fraud has tentacles of deception most people have accepted as truth and reality.

Socialism is not social.

Communism is not community.

Republic is not right wing.

Democracy is a cancer rotting inside the body of the Constitutional Republic

Democracy is not representation.

Communism, socialism and democracy only rule by force.

Freedom is not synonymous with democracy.

There are no rights guaranteed with democracy. The only Bill of Rights in existence is found in the American Constitutional Republic.

Bolshevism and marxism are the underlying evils of all things related to the democrat party, liberals and progressives.

The democrat party and liberal media cannot allow one truth to be known because one truth leads to another.

Covid is a scam. There is no science, just so-called scientists.

There are numerous governments at work in America. The Constitutional Republic is ineffectual in representing Americans, being out-performed by hegemonic democrat party and progressive institutions, including congress.

Climate change is an institutionalized, democracy-supported fraud. There is no science, only references to scientists. Read my commentaries.

The scale of left and right is not democrat and republican. It is totalitarian, or tyranny on the left, and anarchy on the right.

HANG GOVERNOR HERBERT FOR BRINGING VIOLENT MARXISM TO UTAH

HANG Gov
Herbert for
bringing
marxism
(BLM) to Ut.
Many died,
more will.

How can you, dear cowardly fellow Americans, not look at the attacks on our rights to life liberty and property, as anything but organized war? Quo bono? Do the filthy swamp monsters suffer when we are denied access to our public lands; when we are denied access to groceries without control measures?

YAHOO”NEWS” REPORTED, NOVEMBER 6TH, 2016, If This Poll is Right Trump Can’t Win Florida – – or the Election”

Yahoonews reported, November 6, 2016, “If This Poll Is Right Trump Can’t Win Florida – – or the Election”.

With every headline and article I read, written by democrat party apologists or agents, or liberal media personnel, I am sometimes discouraged by the headline if not the actual news. I am clearly an anti-establishment supporter: the clintons being the most establishment entity in government today.

But I know, without exception now, that I always find discrepancies, contradictions and inconsistencies, if not outright lies and whacky fabrications, in every article or “NEWS” item published by any dem/lib.

Garver’s article, if I were to accept that he is relating some truth or fact, could be quite deflating. But he is simply regurgitating models and predictions, not actual polling.

Patience, my fellow American readers, I will make my case.

Furthermore, I dare not read an article from any source without some preponderance as to the truths I will find, naturally hoping to find parties I believe to be dishonest: have maybe, somehow, decided to be honest. Am I actually looking for truth? Yes. Do I find it in liberal media? You, dear readers, will have to read on and decide what is truth and what is not. To preface that I ask you, do you want to know the truth?

If I thought that voting for an avowed socialist, Bernie Sanders, for example, would be in the best interests of America and Americans, I would have been a staunch supporter. The impediment to that is that I know the history and proper application of the terms left-wing, right-wing, and volumes of related information. I understand tyranny and how it germinates and burgeons. I have studied the founding fathers’ efforts to keep America free of tyranny (by any name), and can see through the fraud of socialism. I have studied the writings and arguments for different parts of OUR Constitutional Republic, as presented to knowledgable Americans, in the days of breaking free of Britain.

I have studied the sources for the founding fathers’ insights, the ancient Greek city states. I have come to different conclusions from my contemporaries in a few areas, and theorized about many things. I have written articles for my arguments. Some of my commentaries can be found at earnwrite.com, author brent.

One of my claims and commentaries is that socialism is not a political system. It actually has characteristics of politics but nothing of the representative process. These things are different, you ask. Read on.

Socialism is a system of lying, cheating and plunder. It is an economic system subjected to and pushed by centralized political force: which is not representative power. Socialism does not remedy inequality of income and wealth. When one group is robbed to give to another there is always a cost, an inequality. There is no production from the middle man, people in government. 

Even middle men in business produce something. Middle-men typically provide a service of either delivering or marketing. What service do socialist politicians deliver, stealing from one to give to another? Who is served, besides the politician?

Socialism starts with a big lie, that government can produce something: equality.  Equality cannot be produced nor can it be achieved except when all are reduced to common denominators, poverty and ignorance.

Equality can never be achieved because some do more with the same amount of rsources. Both denominator and numerator must be controlled for equality, and it cannot be forced upon people to do less when brains expand ideas differently.

Struggling for existence in ignorance makes all men equal. Even that extremely low denominator does not make equality. Adaptability is the key to survival and growth. Socialism, the political process of centralizing power, wealth and initiative in the hands of a few self-appointed superiors, must destroy adaptability: initiative and capital. Capital comes in many forms and the socialists, the marxist democrats and bolshevik progressives know this. Capital is initiative, or labor and investment. Investment can be money or goods.

Being forced to compress and remain totally stifled upon ruler command, is close to equality. It is the total incapacity to survive, and that is what centralized dementocrat tyranny wants. The agents boast of equality, but refuse to explain the variables that must be destroyed: variables that cannot be wiped from the nature of man, any man or woman. To enforce socialism, marxism, utopia is the impossible dream, to eradicate mankind from man. Transforming people into beasts of burden is the only way. Ignorance, fear and instinctual responses such as sexualizing everything is how people turn their neighbors into beasts of burden. Who does that today?

It is the ignorance variable that makes all equal. A ruler that promises equality knows the task of forcing ignorance to the depth of animalism, is the continuing challenge and role he or she must take.

The lies and fraud that follow the big lie are designed to hide that first big lie, and move people along to accept tyranny and plunder, by many names that seem innocent. There is no innocence in taking from others by law. Frederick Bastiat referred to this as legal plunder.

Do we read to acquire information? Do we not all listen to the NEWS for information? Do we hear NEWS because we want to be deceived? This seemingly innocent statement should be qualified. It has been said we trust those most who lie to us best.

The headline, “If This Poll Is Right Trump Can’t Win Florida – – or the Election”, surely sparks some kind of emotion from anyone that reads it: for some elation, for others disappointment and even anger. This article, and articles like it, always inspire me to find the stink-bombs of fraud and deception.

Part of tyranny’s fraud and deception is manipulation. Surely, if you are a democrat supporter or a liberal, you are already discounting my words, even though I have barely stated anything against your beliefs or the democrat political machine, or in criticism of liberals manipulating behind the scenes.

I am certain I have stated something you will be able to use to excuse your information gathering quest. But if you miss the point, you miss much more than you can afford. If you refuse to read anything you miss out. If you want the gold you have to get right in the muck and mud, and dig. Neither gold nor truth jump at you and proclaim, ‘here I am’. Fool’s gold will do that and there is a reason fools seek fool’s gold in NEWS and truth.

Some dig for information to arm themselves for further deception. Some like to arm themselves with misinformation because they are afraid of truth. How can one be afraid of something he or she knows not? It is the darkness of dark, the darkness of ignorance, and the light of reality that give us cause to fear.

I hate green beans although I have never tasted them. How do I know I hate them? Is it because I have other information that tells me what I imagine they will taste like? From where did I get this other information, and is it correct? Can I be wrong? How could I possibly be right when green beans have a unique flavor, like all foods?

How can I, or anyone, be right in presumption without reading? How can I be right that I will not like what I fear to read because of the title? Is the title correct? Is the initial presentation of information correct or true? How could I or anyone know if I do not read the article, dissect it and compare the knowledge received with the claim(s) of the title?

The question to you, then, is, ‘what dreadful result of reading “opposing views” for information and truth do you imagine in your mind?’

What fear do I imagine when I read the title, “If This Poll Is Right Trump Can’t Win Florida – – or the Election”?

Am I afraid it is true?

As sentient beings we get overwhelmed with what we imagine we cannot sort through and understand. As a result of this seemingly overwhelming task, some people stick to the simple truths, or familiar biases that are not always true. The titles of so much of what we read or hear seem true but can truth actually be found in titles?

For example I can claim ‘math is easy’. Do you, dear mathematics student, now know math?

Trump will win. Do you now know it? 

Those who manipulate you want you to believe the simple titles because there is no substance to claims they make, and thus their work, if it can be called that, is done: or so they presume.

Those who profess and proclaim by titles and clichés, experience no embarrassment or ridicule. They become demagogues of superficial titles and headlines. They become their own sources of truth, by lies and fraud, all to hide the lack of substance. For example: explain to us the characteristics of democracy and how it applies to our representative system in America.

Have you, dear reader, ever heard a democrat or liberal explain it? To explain it would reveal the deception and fraud.

When the news reports a one or two sentence claim, it is a title, nothing more. The truth of any news is not found in the title, or the title-like news casts that give us one-line clichés and manipulative emotional blasting. The truth is found digging below the apparent NEWS, all of it, and getting in the muck and mud of substance.

The title, “If This Poll Is Right Trump Can’t Win Florida – – or the Election”, caused an emotional response for myself, as it was designed.

However, I have learned to not panic, and I did not. But, does it relate truth and reality? Can the author explain how Trump cannot win? Those who talk in circles of things others do not understand, and do not take time to explain the process, advantages and disadvantages, do not want intelligent followers.

Can I state a title with respect to the author of “If This Poll is Right Trump Cant Win Florida – – or the Election”? Here is my headline: Garver does not want anyone to think for themselves.

Can I explain that, or will you simply believe it? Why would you believe a title of one who tries to not explain by dwelling in the ethereal arena of misrepresented headlines?

Ah, but you do not know until you read and find the substance.

So the question comes to us, before reading any title or hearing any “title-like” news report or news cliché: what do you hope to gain by reading any news or any title? Will you investigate further or be manipulated by clichés and potentially false terms and/or words in titles? 

Another example: Read the headlines of political news reports. Titles and “reports” often have the words democracy and America in the same sentence. If you do not notice democracy and America in the same sentence or title, then search for one example of Constitutional Republic in a sentence with America. Do we assume, as a result, that America is a democracy? Some do. I never did believe it. I looked for myself. You can too, or just believe what you want. 

The initial statement of Garver’s article tries to set a presumption in the reader’s mind, if the reader has not heard opposing views or if the reader decides to accept the title because of the source, that a “poll” is a “poll” because a reporter reported it. Is that true?

Polls today, the day before the election and for the past two years have reported nothing but favorable wins and conditions for democrats.

And we can find opposing information, that will smother a few polls and any researcher woking for “truth”.

Does public education have opposing views? Is this where children learn? Garver’s is an article I would want to read for the NEWS value of it but I admit, my mind is tainted, biased, suspicious because of the absolute deception and fraud I have experienced, refuted and correct, by dem/libs and apologist liberal media. Even that, I acknowledge is a bias. But even a biased report can be dissected and truth extracted from it.

In Garver’s article I quickly found contradictions and poor reporting, as I knew I would,

But you, dear reader, may have your own bias that everything you receive from democrat/liberal sources is truthful, or you might find that it is not democrat or liberal sponsored and supportive.

You may believe polls are objective and accept that polls reveal truth, reporting just what is found in unbiased polling and questioning. At a glance, in any article, I can now find the duplicity of all democrat and liberal writers. I do not include “all” lightly.”

Now you, dear investigator, can journey with me through Garver’s  article and find truths and lies, if there be any. Will a truth cause you some emotional pain? Yes, but I can tell you that finding the truth and accepting one truth, and that one truth on its own merits, for what it really is, liberates the soul. Every step, every truth one finds is another nail pushed out of your coffin of slavery: ignorance.

Ignorance is slavery, for the ignorant, because there are those who use ignorance to manipulate others. Are you, dear fellow American, a fool, trusting others’ words without question or curiosity? How did that human trait become washed from your soul?

So, what is a poll? Do you, dear fellow American, understand every aspect and word of that “title”?

No. So few do. The ones who understand are the ones manipulating the results.

A poll is not 100 percent polling.

Like global warming, there are so few professionals involved, it would cause amazement, wonder and confusion, at how these so-called experts arrive at their conclusions and predictions, and fool us all.

Global warming has zero scientists, although democrats and liberals refer to the “global warming community”, as if it existed.

Find a scientist in the global warming community that has actually done a scientific experiment or taken measurements. There is nobody. How can one be a scientist if one does nothing scientific? How can one be a baseball player if one does nothing “baseball”?

Dig, for yourselves, and find the truth.

There are so few pollsters, the number is insignificant.

How many people, experts would we suspect are part of a “think tank”? What is a think tank?

A think tank is a handful of readers and writers that fabricate “information”, from an extremely limited amount of input, while they pretend to create scenarios from their superior intellect.

To sound intelligent and expert, they “spin”: a reference to spinning yarns, stories. “Pollsters” are think tanksters, they spin “intelligence” from an extremely limited number of people actually polled. Mostly what they do, is twist and fabricate stories that will be accepted after the fact of something sinister and hidden. Has any dem/lib mentioned that polling is mostly computer-generated predictions and models based on old data? Who does not want you to know that?

Like the global warming community, that uses models and computer-generated predictions, based on political remedies for apolitical fabrications, the think-tanksters/pollsters do the same.

Most of the “polling” is taken from biased models and think tanksters that are trying to create credibility for the inevitable incredulity.

The think tanksters/pollsters insert words, change meanings of words, and add contradictory words that shake one’s thoughts, and give the impression that the writers and “think tanksters” are intelligent. This a very few other tactics tricks millions every time.

Polling is a series of models: numbers and think-tanksters , fabricated interpretations. It could be biased but nobody would know until he or she studied polling, rhetoric (grammar) and looked at the questions think-tanksters ask. Have you done that?

Polling is like non-scientific, non-existent scientists in the non-existant global warming community. It is all done by models chasing political compliance for a fabricated fear.

A democrat party poll, is a biased fabrication of democrat/liberal opposition always making the opposing views lose. Look up a term, dialectic advancement, and you will know why democrats appear to lose, some time.

The polls are rigged and the ballot counting is rigged.

Is that a simple, manipulative title? Sure, until you check it out.

I spend more time reading opposing “NEWS” than conservative or republican/republic NEWS. What trashing can I do to truth? What critique do I have with truth without fabrication and deception? None, so I cannot “bash” conservative, historically-correct truth.

For example, America was founded as a democracy. NO. False.

America was founded as a Constitutional Republic. Oh, is that true? Is it important to know? Why would it be important to know?

Are the characteristics of democracy and Constitutional Republic different, and is one better than the other? What would make one better than the other? If we qualify the question with, ‘for who is either system better, and how’, we might be getting closer to some reality.

Who would, in the first place, not want Americans to know the truth of whether America was founded as a democracy or a Constitutional Republic? Who mentions “democracy” continually in their titles? Do constitutional supporters mention democracy in their titles? Do conservatives mention democracy in the same sentences as America? No. The two simply do not go together and do not belong in the same sentence or concept together. Why?

What truth or truths are you failing to learn and know by not being told America was founded as a Constitutional Republic?

What truth or truths do you not learn or know as a result of believing the title, “If This Poll Is Right Trump Can’t Win Florida – – or the Election”?

Before we begin to know that, we must dissect the title. You, however, must determine if you will accept truth when you find it. If you will not then you must realize you are rejecting truth: fact that will benefit yourself, and those around you. That is quite a responsibility.

It is important to know that once you have internalized truth it is not difficult to maintain. Once you know a truth you do not have to relearn it. Compared to lying, and trying to make connections of lies that surely must follow, truth is liberating. Furthermore a truth learned releases other truths from the bondage of fear.

In this case, I boldly state, elections are rigged always in favor of the democrat party. Mistakes would be made in favor of all parties involved, but that is not the case for the innumerable mistakes made in the 2016 election, and prior elections.

The youtube videos abound in the thousands. Secret interviews, explanations, redefining terms and words as their original intents and meanings, and innumerable sites and expose´s can be found and you will learn

I cannot even begin to list them.

But know this, Garver makes no references to anything that will educate you, my dear fellow citizen.

Please. Dear fellow American, do an internet search for black box vote. Check out Hillary meltdown. Anne Coulter has some great interviews and makes super points. Look up voter fraud, Petition Project.

How about Huma Abedin connections to Islam? Check out Fast and Furious gun running, Benghazi interviews, Trey Gowdy, Jason Chaffetz.

Look in the NEWS and find something, and research it until you have the truth. You will know truth. When you find a series of statements and apparent truths, and they connect easily, you have truth.

For example, We have a Bill of Rights. WE live in a Constitutional Republic system of self governance. Are the two connected and can they stand on their own?

Why do We, Americans, have a Bill of Rights? Do all democracies have a Bill of Rights? Would it surprise you to know that there is no such thing as a Bill of Rights anywhere in the world except in America? A Bill of Rights, is unique to OUR Constitutional Republic. Is someone trying to turn your, OUR Constitutional Republic into a democracy, with no individual rights? Who would do such a dastardly thing? Which rights will you, my fellow citizen, voluntarily surrender, Freedom of Speech, Freedom of Religion, Freedom of self-determination, Freedom of commerce, ownership, presumption of innocence?

Find the truths you want. Do it now before you vote for tyranny. You had better ask, and you had better want to know, ‘which party is tyranny’? You had better know because if you make a mistake the losses you wish on others, history shows irrefutably, will either enslave or kill YOU! Search for and boldly face whatever fear this “title” has caused you, and be free.