The dem/libs duped them all.

The dem/libs duped them all.
The “amazingly intelligent” radio talk show hosts, Rush, Savage, and Levin, were all misled from real crimes, committed by the democrats and liberals, to innumerable distractions.
The dem/libs never intended for Mexican and muslim invaders to vote because they don’t. One would be hard pressed to find a news clip of a Mexican, an illegal invader, voting.
I personally know many Mexicans: not one has ever voted.
The propagation of misinformation was, and still is, the key tactic employed by dem/libs who know Sun Tzu’s, and others’, tactics of war.
Make no mistake: the democrats and liberals are at war with We, the People. They are using, and have used successfully, Sun Tzu’s principles.
The first principle we see is that the democrats and liberals have attacked the plans themselves.
Kavanaugh was a plan in the making. The idea of attacking a plan is the easiest assault. It is preemptive in many ways. Attacking a plan, plants doubt.
Sun Tzu’s words: “Warfare is deception.”
Deception is warfare. He or she who deceives, wages war.
The best way to defeat an enemy is to help the enemy defeat himself. Attacking a plan plants doubt the enemy entertains at first, then expands.
The purpose of the so-called Honduran invasion and heavy, heavy news coverage, is to distract. It is one of a long list of many distractions. Distractions must be continual and of numerous varieties to capture and hold attention. Sun Tzu’s words: “Therefore if able, appear unable. If active, appear inactive. If far, appear near. If near, appear far.”
The Honduran situation, the invading army, appears “far” because it was created far to hide the near, active, hidden danger.
The fraud; the deception, is that the invaders elect democrats.
Democrats have not won elections in decades. Indeed, the swamp creatures, the politicians of the unrepresentative branches of government, have propagated so many presumptions, most could not believe or even entertain the oppressive, overwhelming lies and deceptions.
Totalitarian rule must be built upon totalitarian deception. Are we not amazed at the total ignorance of the apparent masses of democrat voters?
We saw a glimpse of scarce democrat support during the 2016 presidential campaign.
A simple reality is that Candidate Trump, at the time, was amassing 20 to 30 times the number of supporters, voters, and electors.
How many Mexican invaders could we count at Clinton “rallies”? Why no democrat-biased media campaigns of Mexicans and Muslims voting? Could it be they did not vote, that the claims of democrats obtaining illegal invader votes were active while the actual voting was inactive? Inactive, or ineffectual, reality, as opposed to dem/lib claims, there was and is an active something, hidden and unknown, until now.
Surely the media did provide scant examples of Mexican support and other dem/lib claims: always organized for but never connected with Clinton rallies. That, alone, makes one wonder if the invader rallies carried credibility for media claims.
We, the public, were witnesses to innumerable claims by the media, and we were slowly brought along to believe the reports. It happened because the masses cannot believe that someone could lie all the time. It is the dichotomy one side has fabricated.
However, we witnessed, time and time again, and still witness it at Trump rallies: scores of thousands of people in support of something, but NOT Trump. Trump is and always has been the representation of something.
Stop, please, and think about that.
If we are led to believe that the tens of thousands represent a mere 50 percent of the voting population, we may be fooled already. It is a given, a full admission by the mechanisms of the opposing party, that roughly half of America votes republican. If hundreds of rallies rallying thousands of supporters represents approximately 50 percent, then three rallies of barely over 1,000 cannot possibly represent the other fifty percent of the voting citizenry.
The formula is the same formula in use by those who claim the democrat “side” is determined by the same variables even though the formula does not produce equally consistent results.
Wikipedia reports Candidate Trump delivered 187 rallies while there is no list for Hillary or Bernie. Combined the democrat variable for the same formula approaches zero, really if the tallying people and mechanisms cared not to tout a terrible loss compared to the Trump masses.
The average attendance at Trump rallies was 6,460, top estimates being 29,000 and 25,000 while Hillary was lucky she had over 1,000 attendees at a maximum of three rallies.
There is no formula for that failure to draw crowds, especially when Clinton could not produce a variable for the formula dem/libs themselves use.
It was the dem/lib media overwhelmingly announcing that Trump supporters represented approximately 50 percent voting support, while the dem/lib media fell silent on the obtuse impossibility that near non-existent numbers at a fraction of the number of rallies somehow, magically produced approximately 50 percent voter support for the democrats.
Democrats claim Trump supporters put him in office, “…speaking to his base…”, as the media proclaims, while claiming non-existent democrat voters almost put Clinton in office.
If “…speaking to the base of supporters…” translates to approximately 50 percent for Trump, then “speaking to the democrat base also represents a percentage of voters supporting democrats.
The ratio, according to the numbers, is about 30 to one in favor of Trump. Is it possible the Clinton campaign really, only “spoke to a little over three percent of the voting population? Quite possible given the overwhelming Art of War Tactics the democrats and liberals needed to employ.
If large numbers at rallies, according to dem/lib media “reports” put Trump in office, then that should translate to an equally identifiable factor in determining the so-called and approximate 50 percent that voted for Clinton, and other democrat politicians. Where is the evidence of anything close to 50 percent support for democrats? It cannot be found nor fabricated. The dem/lib media did not try to fabricate that discrepancy. Empty dem/lib algebra and claims were inactive while the reality of the shattered formula was active.
The dem/lib media actually cannot lie completely, although they would prefer it. They admitted, and still do, that candidate Trump and President Trump spoke and speaks to his base, at these rallies. Was Clinton speaking to her base? How could such a small, near non-existent base for Clinton translate to almost 50 percent?
We are constantly reminded that the women’s vote went to Clinton and almost always goes to democrat politicians. Where was it then? It was at the bigger rallies, for Trump.
We are constantly told that Mexicans and blacks vote heavily in favor of democrats. We are constantly told democrat politicians represent the minorities. Does low minority turn-out at democrat party rallies magically represent 50 percent or does it represent low voter support for democrats. Surely, irrefutably!
It is assumed dem/libs do tell truth on occasion, and that is completely erroneous.
Sun Tzu’s principle, “If they have advantage, entice them.” Who is enticing with crazy claims and false attacks, in everything they do and say?
We are in the first stage, the political stage, of war, moving into more dangerous stages, right now, even on the very eve of an election.
Sun Tzu’s principle: “The political war must first be won before the military campaign can succeed.”
The dem/libs have employed Sun Tzu’s principle of distraction in this political stage of war: deception.
We must realize that the democrats have the vote-counting mechanisms in their control, in a manner, and that they have had them in their control for decades. We could consider these logistics as part of the deep state. This is the active while the inactive, again, is the apparent acquisition of new voters, who do not vote.
The dem/libs long ago invaded propriety and honesty in the representative process, transforming and disfiguring it to suit their political campaign.
Invaders do many things. One is they invade to take-over land and space. The act of taking is theft. Taking over, to use a phrase the invaders have used for decades, is to take. It is to take that which does not belong to the takers.
Why do democrats propagate this crime against the nation and the people of this nation?
Stop! Who relinquishes control and who does not not. George Washington is the republican star of relinquishing control while the democrats are seeing it, from YOU; from We, the People.
Why does anyone try to gain control of anything, referring to the vote-counting mechanisms? Think about that for a moment.
Consider a baseball team that gets control of the scoring mechanisms. We all know why. We call it many things, one being, ‘having the umps in the pocket of the team’. Anybody, any organization that seeks a subversive, cloaked acquisition of counting mechanisms, seeks to cheat. It is for the primary purpose of taking that which does not legally and fairly belong to the takers. But why do takers, take?
The mental aberration is that the taker knows the taker cannot acquire honestly and legally that which the taker wants.
There is no way around that reality.
While the democrats and dem/lib media have been organizing and presenting crazy, what has happened out of public purview?
Sun Tzu’s principle: “Therefore a wise general will strive to feed off the enemy.”
The republicans, conservative talk show hosts and politicians, have been feeding the enemies’ plans for years by speaking to their crazy and enhancing the subversive dogmas the totalitarians behind the scenes have presented. The fundamentals: Constitutional Republicanism, self-governance, representative permission and accountability, and economic freedom, have been inactive, until now.
If democrat party voters and supporters would honestly look at the crazy, outlandish statements of their own “leaders”, Pelosi who acts like she is suffering dementia, and Maxine Waters who speaks to incite violence, they would see what republic-oriented and conservative citizens see, crazy. Are these two democrats, for example, really crazy, or are they exhibiting distractions to hide something?
Sleight of hand in the political arena (not the representative forum) is a trick the dem/libs use continually.
We have been bombarded with three main frauds. We have accepted three main frauds.
1 dem/libs have a basic misunderstanding of realities but generally tell the truth.
2 dem/libs have convinced the masses, even some in the republican party, that republican and conservative is right wing. It is not. Conservative means to conserve that balanced middle the founding fathers established, on the true scale: left is totalitarianism and right is anarchy.
3 Democrat politicians get roughly half the vote, sometimes a little more to win elections and sometimes less, to their losses.
We, the conservatives, the balanced middle, are occasionally stunned and cannot believe the whacky things the democrats and liberals say and do. They have us chasing their tails. Dem/lib crazy, unprincipled and illogical words and actions give us an overwhelming amount of discussion topics, and it occupies our time, efforts, and attention, by design.
What has happened while guards at the door of public purview and opinion, have been preoccupied with the media marionettes of distraction dancing “far” down the hallways away from the guarded doors of reality?
Comments from the dem/libs are purposeful distractions. There should be no doubt their comments and events have captured our attention.
That is a dangerous state in which a nation should not find itself trapped.
What happens while we watch the building burn? The arsonist stands beside us, watches with delight, and sneaks into the night to collect insurance money the next day.
America is burning to the ground, so it appears.
Sun Tzu’s principle is as old as time. It is a trick so useful and easy, the Three Stooges employed it for their slapstick comedy:
Curly presents his hand at his own waist, then circles his other arm behind his back, up and over his shoulder to hit Moe. As Moe is looking down the other hand comes from above Moe, out of Moe’s field of vision.
“Generally in warfare, if (you or your forces are) equal, be able to fight.” Dem/libs never debate, they never stick to a topic. They do not fight because they are not equal: their plans are not equal, being weaker. They know it and employ correct principles of warfare.
“Generally in warfare, if weaker, be able to avoid them.” Dem/libs have mounted massive campaigns to avoid the principles, attacking plans and isolated individuals.
“Generally in warfare, if fewer, be able to evade them.” Again, massive misinformation campaigns, actually using their enemies’ resources, to evade. How many times have we heard republican politicians and so-called conservatives in media and talk radio argue in favor of democrat party and international liberal dogma, that America is a democracy?
The talk show hosts “get it”. What the talk show hosts mean is they believe the democrats do not understand, and the talk show hosts and hostesses spend valuable time explaining to those who fully understand sleight of hand and deception. Nobody can be as stupid as the democrat politicos pretend to be. It is sleight of hand. It is Sun Tzu’s and Clausewitz’s tactic of distraction and deflection.
Imagine an army wants to invade a country. It plans to cross the border of a neighboring country at a certain point on a certain schedule. But, the army announces plans to invade at a certain point on a certain day so the defending country can mobilize and destroy. That is the most fool-hardy tactic an army, or political party could employ. There is absolutely no deception in that, except if the army’s tactic is inactive, or a ploy.
The best tactic is to win the political/misinformation aspect by feigning an attack; leaking false information for a location and date, and attacking another point three days before the leaked date.
Leaking information, spying, is a tactic of all aspects of the war. We have seen dem/libs employ this for years, to distract.
To apply this great tactic in deflecting attention is to attack a border, with an army that was never intended to reach the border. The defenders mobilize, spend the nation’s treasury, contributing to the loss they create for themselves: numerous principles engaged.
How would we describe the Honduran, mostly military-aged men, army moving to very specific locations?
What is the hidden “active” while the inactive, far, feigned attack captures our attention?
The dem/libs are cheating right now, and have been for weeks, to steal, to take-over, TAKE the election.
The Honduran, inactive, invasion is genius: diabolical.
The dem/libs, like the word :”bolshevik” are a small minority. They have feigned large and looming because they have employed all Sun Tzu’s principles: particularly attacking the weak with bigger forces.
Sun Tzu’s principle, “Generally in warfare, if ten times the enemy’s strength, surround them, has effectively been employed by the dem/libs for decades. To attack a smaller, weaker enemy, simply find one not aligned with others, Kavanaugh, for example. The democrats always unite their forces against individuals, appearing to be more numerous than they really are.
The question nobody is asking is what are the dem/libs doing behind the inactive distractions?
The numbers show the democrats have, at most, half of the claimed public support of the voters (25%). In another I wrote article I estimated Clinton had, at best 27 percent of the popular vote. Later I reduced it to approximately 17 percent.
Hillary, at best managed to entertain three rallies with attendance over a thousand, while Trump consistently filled arenas. An average of 6,460 per event, times 187 events, all over the country, involving different people at each and every rally, accounts for 1,208,020 supporters while Clinton and Sanders together cannot show any rough, meagre estimates.
Where is this massive democrat wave? Is it hidden in the respective nothing?
It is non-existent but we believe it is something because of sleight of hand, distractions.
WE, the People, need to physically invade the vote-counting mechanisms and take the count ourselves.
We need to physically take and do, NOW!
The next phase the dem/libs will employ, already planned and in execution now, is the seizure of Congress by force.
Beware! This series of events, and election, mirrors the bolshevik seizure of the Politburo, and subsequent slaughter of Russians and others for decades.
We care not if the few democrat party voters go crazy and whine. We, the People have a commitment to even they themselves, to assure no take-overs, no coup, no fraud ,and no intended genocide.
In my ten years of fighting dem/libs on craigslist and other public forums, of the thousands of claims I have personally investigated, I have yet to find a truth a dem/lib political agent has told. That represents totalitarian deception and distraction.
Totalitarian force cannot be obtained without totalitarian deception, and that is the warfare democrats, liberals, and the bolshevik media complex behind the scenes (and openly), have been waging against We, the People.
There was no Russian Revolution. It was a bolshevik invasion, the same we are witnessing in America NOW! They changed their identities to progressive.
The bolsheviks had, as a primary goal, the elimination of Russians to the count of 30 million people.
What do you, yes, YOU, think the bolsheviks want to do with Americans who have thwarted totalitarian rule ing America for centuries?
Is 100 million eliminated enough for the blood-thirsty dem/libs? No, the dem/libs account for, in my estimation, at most 20 percent of American population, leaving 80 percent guilty of resistance to totalitarian bolshevik/dem/lib/progressive rule.
This means 80 percent, in bolshevik/democrat/liberal minds, can be ruthlessly and justifiably eliminated. This includes minorities.
Please, read. Read The Constitution and The Bill of Rights, YOUR rights.
Search the roots of antifa. It goes all the way back to the bolshevik invasion and the attempted invasions of all countries, including America during Woodrow Wilson’s (democrat) presidency.
We must do more than vote. We must watch the vote counting, even where not possible.
Make representative, self-governance a reality in spite of deep-state, fifth column, subversive democrat party hegemony. Be there, be everywhere.
Our reticence and fears will be our elimination.
It is critical NOW. It is critical now more than ever before. The progressives/bolsheviks are poised.

Impeach Trump, yes, yay! Hmmm, for what?

Impeach Trump, yes, yay! Hmmm, for what?
I am all in favor of impeaching president Trump for crimes he has committed in office. Isn’t that what impeachment is for?
Hmmm. I am all for impeaching President Trump for the crimes for which he has been convicted. Hmmmm, which ones? Can dem/libs tell us? Can dem/libs speculate on his crimes?
Wait. We do not convict anyone on speculation, not even a dem/lib. Would dem/libs convict their own on speculation? Why was Hillary not convicted then?
Was there not ample speculation? There was, and more.
There is the key. Dem/libs want to convict, circumvent the law, and imprison those they decide, not who law, or legality, or a court, decides. Is that not tyranny, monarchy?
Dem/libs would commandeer power to punish without a conviction, without a trial, without a charge, with mere speculation that they either instigate or invent. They want more power from those who defend themselves and their opposing views.
Is that what you, dear reader, want? You may think you are aligned with the democrats but they are not aligned with you when they seek to add power to their own political process and take the real power of We, the People out of your control.
If democrats commandeer power it must come from somewhere or someone.
Consider this dear readers. If democrat politicians, and handful of republican politicians, decide to give themselves more power over justice, justice loses power. Those who rely upon justice itself to beside and free of powerful influencing justice, are no longer free and secure. If justice, or control of justice is given to one over another, justice becomes imbalanced for all not except those who suppressed justice for all.
What democrat voters, liberals and democrat party supporters fail to realize, iooroutright refuse to acknowledge, is that justice in the hadnds of a few is not justice, and it comes at a cost to all others. What they do not realize is that they, by being separated from justice are thrown into the mix of the masses by those who claim to defend them: democrat politicians.
If democrats take control of justice from President Trump, they seize it from all, including democrat voters, liberals and democrat party supporters.
This action also separates democrat party from democracy, bye the way.
Do these same dem/libs, the democrat politicians and party supporters, know there is a process to impeachment, or do they care?
Can they tell you what the process is and what constitutes an impeachment trial? Can they tell you how to start an impeachment trial and what the parameters are?
Can the dem/libs identify a crime for which Resident Trump should be impeached?
I am not asking for an alleged crime because in America, under justice before the law, nobody is convicted for alleged, insinuated, or purported crimes. Nobody is investigated without a known crime having been committed.
Why is President Trump under monarchial/tyrannical investigation? Power to be treated fairly and just before the law has been taken from him, and yours along with it.
That has been the plan all along. Do you, dear reader honestly think those who have commandeered law and justice do not understand that principle and how to circumnavigate it?
Are these “people” advocating that someone incarcerate President Trump for no conviction, no trial, no charges, nothing identified as high crimes and misdemeanors?
Are the dem/libs thing to imprison someone who does not deserve it or does President Trump somehow, magically, in their minds, deserve jail?
Who would arrest President Trump? Have the dem/libs thought about that? Are dem/libs aware that President Trump has a body guard, a whole department of agents assigned to providing him and his family with security and protection? Are dem/libs aware that the security would prevent an arrest?
If such an attempt to arrest were to take place, is it possible conflict would ensue?Is it possible injuries and maybe even death would follow such conflict? Is this what Americans want? Surely some do. Would they want it directed at a democrat president? If not why do they decide who gets protection of law and who is secured with justice?
Is that what democrat voters, liberals, and democrat party supporters want: innocent people dying because democrat politicians and dem/libs want an innocent man jailed without a conviction; without a trial; without a charge; without a crime; without due process: all to serve a handful that have seized power of law from everyone?

REITERATING MICHAEL BROWN TRAGEDY: SAVE FUTURE MICHAEL BROWNS. ORIGINALLY A CRAIGSLIST POST, 12/2/14. TRUTH IS ALWAYS TIMELY.

Truth versus injustice for Michael Brown, and others to follow.

Without an honest discovery and acceptance of truth there is no justice for Michael Brown. There will never be justice for the other Michael Browns to follow. Justice is not preemptive so we cannot create justice for no crimes committed. It is a fallacy that we can create justice for the future Michael Browns. This important, life -saving transformation depends on how the people decide to see Michael Brown. If they choose to see Michael Brown as a victim who just happened to trip and rob a store; a suffering victim who forgot to not attack a police officer; a victim who accidentally found a gun lying in another’s holster when he decided to resist lawful constraints, then there will be no justice for Michael Brown and no prevention for other Michael Browns.

How do we address the problem of an independent hand reaching into another’s property to take a gun that belongs to a representative of the law, if we do not see it; if we ignore it? How can we stop the hand of the next Michael Brown from reaching for lawful restraint’s weapons? How do we stop the hand of the next Michael Brown from blatant attempt to injure another, and others? How do we change for the better when we do not face the facts of this case honestly? Do we spend time and money attacking ownership, representation of the law, or do we ask questions such as why do young black males die by the thousands every year? How do we change for the better when various elements amongst us attack the effects and not the causes, while the causes continue to savage and ravage those the elements pretend to serve and save?

Is there something in the way the masses of black males live their lives that can be changed? Why are people so distracted from the cause of the effects? Why are some people trying to change things that will not make a difference for the future Michael Browns?

TRUTH AND JUSTICE VERSUS FALSE CAUSE AND EFFECT

Truth and injustice for Michael Brown:

Without an honest search for and acceptance of truth there is no justice for Michael Brown. In reality there can be no justice for Michael Brown. The justice we seek, and the purpose of justice is to insure deterrence for future effects of the cause.

There will never be justice for the other Michael Browns to follow if effect is not attached to the correct cause. Justice is not preemptive so we cannot create justice for no crimes committed. It is a fallacy that we can create justice for the future Michael Browns, without acceptance of the cause of the effect.

This justice depends on how the people decide to see Michael Brown. If they choose to see Michael Brown as a victim who just happened to trip and rob a store: a suffering victim who accidentally initiated violence and resistance for cause of his own making; a victim who accidentally found a gun lying around in another’s holster, and decided to exempt himself from lawful constraints, then there will be no justice and no prevention for other Michael Browns.

How do we address the problem of an unauthorized hand reaching into another’s property to take a gun that belongs to a representative of OUR law, if we do not see it; if we ignore it? How can we stop the hand of the next Michael Brown from unauthorized taking of another’s property? If you do not see the reality, you will never see the just and fair results of the actual causes.

Michael Brown committed numerous crimes in the process of bringing lawful response upon himself, and others also will unless you and those in charge of justice see the reality and truth.

The truth is that Michael Brown reached where he should not have reached. Michael Brown seized upon another’s property: attempted theft. Michael Brown resisted arrest that would have executed justice in the field and delivered Brown to justice in the courts. Brown committed the crime of threatening by word and action, reaching for a weapon that showed his intent and commitment to criminal activity. Michael Brown committed the crime of assault. All these things are not the actions of a victim.

Michael Brown tried to act above the law, with a representative of the law, hired to execute the law, and Michael Brown paid for his crimes immediately and to a degree far greater than he would have, had he not committed crimes that led to other crimes, and resistance to law for accountability to his crimes.

All crimes committed were done so by Michael Brown, and he paid dearly  for his own actions, with his own demise.

Who is next?

Who is next, if reality is not addressed?

How do we stop the hand of the next Michael Brown from attempted theft, assault and murder if we do not face the facts of this case honestly?

Do we spend time and money attacking ownership and representation of the law, or do we ask questions such as why young black males die by the thousands every year? Is there something in the way they live their lives that can be changed? Why are people so distracted from the cause and effects? Why are some people trying to change things that will not make a difference for the future Michael Browns? 

I can be cruel and say that Michael Brown, a thug, thief and violent criminal got what he deserves. Michael Brown’s pain is done, gone, non existent now, but the residual pain belongs to others: others who will experience the same if the causes are not addressed. Misdirected effort addressing the wrong cause of twisted effects is the problem. For whom do the protestors and media rage now, themselves?

This event affects every American because the corrupt media and lobby groups, and black puppet masters want it that way.

We can lament the loss of another young black male to the oppressive white male, if it were true. But in spite of twisted media and exploitive politicians and public figures: political whores who twist cause to injure the innocent, most of America knows the truth but is held hostage to the cause and effect misalignment of those laying disconnected blame.

The white male, not only is not to blame, but the white male is being vilified for crimes not committed by those males.

Imaginary crimes hide the reality, and those who point twisted and maiming fingers at others are to blame: and to be blamed for the next Michael Browns.

There will be more.

What the dem/libs and black puppeteers want is for black citizens, regular working people, to not know that white America laments the loss of another young black male, another fellow American: an American first but black only to users and exploiters of mankind. Most Americans see all others as Americans first, but the exploiters and users of others’ energy and lives work to suppress that reality, for their own gain.

Even as I write this, that “white America “ laments the loss, I feel sick to my stomach that I am forced to identify color identity exists. It is that way because a very small minority of manipulative liars and exploiters who avoid; who distract and deflect from cause, want it that way.

Michael Brown, to me, and almost all Americans, was a wayward youth, who was not held accountable through various levels of criminal activity, reported as a career criminal, as he was, because unaccountability causes escalation.

Those who distract and deflect from the reality and use “race” as a tool, are partially guilty of Brown’s death, but will be more guilty of future deaths of similar circumstances.

The black puppeteers use pain, anger, and misinformation to extort black Americans to do foolish things.

Ignoring the facts; facts the Grand Jury had to accept, is the dem/lib, distraction, deflection, color-fabrication, and cause-and-effect fracture at work.

The black puppeteers and dem/libs want anger and emotion ruling the black population because it keeps them ignorant and exploitable. They want it for all Americans.

There is anger and pain in the whole of America but the black agitators, democrat politicians, and lying liberal media do not want Americas’ pain known. There is outrage in the whole of America, in the whole American society, but who is addressing the cause honestly and who is torturing and mutilating reality?

An agenda always takes people away from the truth, unless it is the agenda of discovering, knowing, and living by truth: cause and effect.

Many refute the idea that Michael Brown was acting criminally. Some claim he was driven to extremes. Was he driven to an extreme to reach for a police officer’s gun, another’s property?

Was Brown “driven” to an extreme when simple obedience to an officer of OUR law, would have changed everything? Was Brown driven to many steps in disobedience and premeditated danger to another, others, and that he magically did not know this reality?

How can anyone know what was in Brown’s mind, enough to claim he was not in the process of extricating himself from an accountability situation with the intended harm of another, and fully cognizant of the danger and destruction he planned to inflict upon another, and others. Brown had already inflicted pain and assault on another, so it was generally accepted he was quite prepared to do the same to the officer of OUR law, and others who would follow.

Brown’s demeanor and desires were then, and are today, irrefutably obvious and anyone who says otherwise is deflecting, distracting and torturing and mutilating truth.

The liberal misfits want to blame something other than themselves for Michael Brown’s death, and expect others to turn a blind eye to the truths of this case, and so many others, as they do.

Who is responsible for Michael Brown’s young demise, society? Why? Why is society blamed for so many anomalies and crimes society did not commit? Who is responsible? Brown is responsible for his own actions.

Who is responsible for the next deaths that surely will follow the disconnect of cause and effect?

Will the liberals and demented politicians who deflect and distract be held accountable for misleading Americans to disconnected results they themselves bring upon themselves? Those who distract, deflect, scourge and mutilate truth: the cause and effect they tried to blame on the innocent, are irrefutably responsible to some degree, but those they blame are not.

A tsunami just hit the coast and some look at waves as being the problem. Others claim it is underwater currents that cause big waves. Liberals protest and lobby to make big waves and underwater currents illegal. Meanwhile many see waves as a result of bigger problems: the problem of underwater ocean floor mining, that dem/libs cause. Moving earth underwater causes underwater earthquakes, which cause tsunamis, but the liberals, who actually gain by the demise of coastal areas, employment in disaster management, deflect, distract, torture and mutilate truth. Liberals blame a particular tsunami on a big wave they saw two years ago, thinking, hoping beyond rationale that the two are related. When questioned they blame a different wave, and then a different one, and then another and another, until the search for the cause is lost.

Dem/libs definitely deflect and distract from all truth because one truth leads to another. This is obvious with the crazy, unsubstantiated stories and causes dem/libs identify, whites, for example, as the cause of one American black man’s sociopathy and disconnect from cause-and-effect.

The tsunami of death that will follow will be the bloody hands of dem/libs, progressives and demon-crat politicians. If the causes can be identified honestly, and change effected, the results of deaths that will surely follow and threaten all Americans can be halted.

But death will follow because people lie for reason, and the reason unbeknownst to almost all, is that the dem/libs want the death, destruction, chaos and division they propagate, otherwise they would not knowingly lie about the causes and effects. They know. Dem/lib deflections, distractions, torture and mutilation of cause-and-effect: an actual attack on truth, is the direct cause of impending and unstoppable societal destruction.