PART 3: “NASA OBSERVATORY RECORDS UNUSUAL ACTIVITY ON THE SUN.”

Now, finally, open the article, read and watch the animation.

The title of the article reads, “the sun just did something weird, and 3 other space stories you may have missed this week”.

The sun did something weird? How does nature that can only act natural, do something weird? How dumb. How is nature weird? How does the sun, totally untouched and unaffected by earth become weird?

What are the pre-test conditions and data, and post-test conditions, from which nasa makes comparisons to state the sun did something different or weird? Pre-test and post test, science, is absolutely missing from this goofy article. How utterly ridiculous can nasa luciferians get?

The subscript reads, “An oddball new exoplanet, small but significant steps toward the future of spaceflight and a mystery in the Kuiper Belt.”

“Oddball”? Wow, that is so scientific it is scary. What a stupid thing to write. How does a thing without feet step? What stupid clichés can only follow stupid “people”,

A “new exoplanet”? A new planet discovered? “Exo”, as in external? There can only be an “exo” if there is an “endo”, or internal. And what determines ”exo” and “endo”? No comparators, no examples, no parameters or definitions, just stupid words and pieces tossed about to confuse and create education chaos. This is bloody, evil deception.

See how the luciferian liars toss in terms and words that mean nothing so they can sound smart and expert, so they can lie with impunity and control you first with fear and then LAW that follows your response to fear they create.

How much farther from earth than the sun, is this theorized planet?

If all nasa can provide is an animated depiction of the moon from earth, while the sun is even more out of the realm of visual possibility, then a new planet, even more distant than that, cannot be seen or discovered.

How utterly science-retarded can nasa get?

If the sun is impossible to see because the moon is impossible to see, then some crazy, theorized, fabricated, imagined new “exoplanet”, farther away, is absolutely impossible, and absolutely impossible to film or photograph.

The subscript reads, “An oddball new exoplanet… in the Kuiper Belt.”

There is no Kuiper belt because there is no measurement or substantiated distance. There is no relationship of these heavenly bodies therefore they do not exist. The distance to the sun is theorized to be 400 times the distance of the moon from earth, but the distance of moon from earth is not calculated so none of what follows, the whole of globe theory and nasa, is not substantiated and does not exist.

Sure, go ahead, build a house on a pretend foundation, and you don’t have a house, an attic, a garage. You don’t have walls, windows, doors and heat. It is impossible to build something on nothing.

Nasa and globe theory is all so much building on nothing. Show us the calculation of the distance of earth to moon. From that, maybe, one could extrapolate information, a measurement or two, to plug into an equation to calculate something from that foundation. Nothing!

I can line up 3 yard sticks, then four yardsticks at a right angle to the three, and then aim five yardsticks from the end of the three yard sticks to the end of the four yard sticks and create a right angle triangle. This is known as a 3, 4, 5 right triangle. It can be used to create a right angle for building something. You can see it. You can watch the creation of it and how it works. You can see the application of it in making a 90 degree angle out of measurements that can only come together in one way.

There is absolutely nothing of the sort, and less in partiality that lends credibility to anything luciferian nasa fabricates. Show us the one point fixed in space, not “space”, from which other variables are derived, measured and used to calculate anything? Nasa still does not have definitive distance of the end of the atmosphere, or beginning of “space” so the distance of earth to moon is impossibly known.

But, don’t believe me. Look at the animation. Look at the words of the article itself, written, fabricated by science-retard, sam matthews.

These yahoo”NEWS” writers are so dishonest and evil, they do not deserve capitalized names, being liars and devils that deserve no human recognition for their crimes against truth, reality, and humanity.

PART 2: “NASA OBSERVATORY RECORDS UNUSUAL ACTIVITY ON THE SUN.”

PART 2

This “technology” claim that the sun is visible, is as luciferian and completely evil, as anything nasa fabricates.

Find yourself the best camera and see how far it “sees” accurately. Get a telescope and see how far on land it “sees”. And you believe your telescope “sees” planets millions and billions of miles away? How is the light from a planet of such vast distance not completely dissipated?

It is unbelievably arrogant and science-retarded to think light is not dissipated over such vast distances. Even at 93 thousand miles, light is totally dissipated. 930 miles, 93 miles.

They claim they are looking at stars and other heavenly bodies that are millions and billions of miles away. How do they know? How, without a single calculation do they “know” the objects they see are not 200 miles away? They don’t.

Don’t ask why. Evil lies, must lie, and must flip-flop everything, for control.

Their lies are based on their fundamental lies.

Find the world’s most effective telescope, and goofle how far it sees effectively? 93 million miles? Impossible!

The Hubble telescope does not boast it can see the moon, much less the sun. If the Hubble cannot get actual photographs of the moon, it does not see it, and we know it does not see the moon because there exists no photos, only images, composites, drawings and CGI animations and depictions. They just said that.

Go and look for yourselves. when they can only animate and depict, it is an admission that they have no videos or photos of the moon.

Find the specifications of the Hubble telescope and report here.

Can any of the “space” theory goons show us the equation and numbers, with angle for triangulation, that determines the distance any telescope can clearly “see”?

NOPE!

Imagine a telescope can see 1,000 miles. How far is it theorized that “space” begins? Estimates are 300 to 330 miles high is where “space” begins.

Why do telescopes not film “space” walks, satellites, “space” craft?

Film, not CGI; not mystery locations in space where a camera floats and takes photos; film does not exist because the tasks are impossible, and nasa admits it with fake everything.

Why are there no actual videos of a rocket lifting off, and being traced into “space”?

How far away is 93 million miles compared to 300 miles? If that is the best telescope technology can do, and I speculate, having seen no claims of visual contact from any telescope, then it is impossible given current technology, that anything can “see” the surface of the sun.

To see the surface of the sun clearly, one would need to build a telescope that has 93,000 times the resolution of the strongest telescope, based on visual acuity of 1,000 miles. Can these telescopes see across the planet 1,000 miles? Is it not curious that a telescope with apparent accuracy to see 93 million miles does not use that acuity to look across the horizon or into “space” to film satellites and rockets?

You see they, nasa et al, have you convinced that the planets they see in the heavens are millions and billions of miles, or light years away. How does the light from a star billions of light years away not dissipate?

But wait, estimates of moon and sun distances are based on prior estimates, based on nothing, based on gross inadequacies to guess if something is 200 or 200 million miles away. It is all lies. Nobody knows. Nobody has done a calculation. Nobody has a number to inject into an equation.

Telescopes claim they can look into the heavens and see planets at certain theorized distances. There was never a beginning point as to how far these heavenly bodies are so no comparisons can be made with references points that do not exist.

So, “scientists” might estimate the distance of the sun using completely erroneous estimates based on theorized distances of stars or moon. The stars might be only hundreds of miles away, reflections of things in the firmament.

Yes, it is possible there is a firmament, and no such fantasy as “space”. NASA has not filmed or photographed “space”.

If I am in my house, and wonder how cold it is outside, I look out the window and make observations. If I execute a pre-test and see water, and check an hour later to see the same water is freezing, I can theorize the temperature is below freezing. That is a start, observation. There is no starting observable point to nasa fabrications, lies and quackery.

There is no start to “space”; no pre-test; no science.

If I look up and see a star, I wonder what it is and how far away it is. If I have no means to measure the distance of that star, any guess, made popular by repetition, is an imagined guess at best. From that guess used as a benchmark for other distances, the 100% margin of error is multiplied.

I can estimate the sun must surely be closer than the stars, because it is bigger, or appears to be bigger, and that is all. I can theorize and nothing more. That is all NASA has, theory based on theory based on anti-science, anti-trigonometry, imagination. Show us one measurement NASA has ever made to back their guesses.

Theory based on theory based on imagination and fabrication could provide a margin of error of thousands or millions percent. No distance of any heavenly body has ever been calculated.

In reality, there is no proof that the strongest telescope “sees” farther than 300 to 330 miles, so the required magnification of the best current visual is actually 310,000 times more than we have.

I do not believe, in the least that nasa can see 1,000 miles much less 9,300 times that distance. You can believe that if you decide to believe the objects you see in the sky are the distances NASA and globe-theory imagine and perpetually repeat.

The sun must be 93 million miles away because we know the moon is 238,000 miles away, but the moon might only be 100 miles away. Nobody knows because nobody can produce an equation to measure that distance, and nobody has a single shred of data.

For all “science” knows the moon might be farther away, and bigger.

Go ahead, believe their claims and distances. Worst, believe liars are not lying to you that they know these things when they have absolutely nothing but planned deception to make you think something is known: that they are smarter than you.

Can you find information that shows how nasa technology does it? Can you find an actual photo of the moon that is not an image, a composite, a representation, drawing, CGI for animated depiction? How do you expect then, to find an actual photo of the surface of the sun? Again, can you explain, show, or prove the distance in any equation” Or, can you provide a reference to an equation measurement, or reference point in space or on earth from which extrapolations of distances can be calculated?

That image, a piece of a “footage” is a fabrication, a lie. Even nasa states it is an image and not a photo.

IMPOSSIBLE NASA/YAHOO”NEWS”, FEBRUARY 11, 2023, “NASA OBSERVATORY RECORDS UNUSUAL ACTIVITY ON THE SUN.”

The sub script to the headline reads, “Other space highlights from the week”

Upon opening the following is the article:

https://www.yahoo.com/news/this-week-in-space-sun-exoplanet-kuiper-belt-154354360.html

It is almost comical that fake, NASA science can see 93 million miles.

93,000 miles is impossible, and much less 1,000 times as much, 93,000,000 miles.

You must understand that just because we can see sunlight coming to us from theorized distance, does not mean we can see the distance of 93 million miles? It is theory that the sun is 93 million miles away. You must surely recognize the distance is not proved, formulated, or equated. No?

Can you find one measurement by NASA or globe theory that injects one number into an equation that measures, by triangulation, for example, the distance of the sun from the earth?

How do you measure distance? You walk it, drive it, or use triangulation to measure known variables and then use constants to calculate.

How else could someone determine the distance except by one or another equation or formula? It is impossible to look straight at an object even 93 yards away, and determine distance, and even more bizarre to think someone or something can look straight on and determine a distance over i.760 billion times greater.

When the guesstimate was made, did a survey transit with the capacity to measure a distance of 93 million miles exist? How about 93 miles, 9.3 miles?

Does such a survey instrument exist today?

How, anywhere in any realm of science, can a single eye, uni-vision of a telescope look straight on and determine the distance of any object? Do telescopes measure height of shadows cast by one planet on another?

The scenarios for guess and speculating are ludicrous, and anyone who thinks someone is telling any bit of truth when they speculate these ridiculous theories, is living in near-absolute ignorance.

Suppose you can see from one town to the next, can you look down the road and determine the distance? Can you do it better with a telescope or binoculars? No, it is worse with a telescope.

Can you look at your odometer and see the numbers click as you drive? How did the auto manufacturers derive a correct measure and place it in mechanism of an odometer?

It starts with a smaller measurement, the length of a foot and yard.

We know a certain number of feet and/or yards makes a mile. We could walk that distance with a wheel on a stick with a counter and use geometry with the measure of the circumference to determine distance.

We could look at a tower from one town to another, measure with a protractor the angle of ascent, and inject the known height of the tower to calculate the distance. It is all built upon measurements, equations and calculations.

For distance to the sun, or moon, or clouds, there is no measurement, not one, no equations ever used and nothing exists to be calculated. There is nothing, not a shred of data in existence to determine almost everything nasa and globe-theory pretend-science claims.

Not knowing the angle of ascent or the height of the tower, could anyone look straight at the pinnacle of the tower and know the distance along the level to the base? No! A million guesses might put someone close, but do it now for something hundreds of miles away. Impossible, and absolutely impossible for just the distance of the moon.

Please, globe-theory believers, show us the equation and numbers, used to determine the distance of the sun from earth.

Oh wait, it is based on other distances of planets. From what measurements, equations and calculations are these distances derived? None: all speculation and fabrication as well?

Make it easy, show us the measurements, angle and equation used to measure the distance of the moon from earth, 238,000 miles. Even NASA only shows an animated representation. Do your own goofle search. The search I found claims one can see the distance from earth to moon in an “animated depiction”.

Animated? Depiction? Drawings with numbers drawn, done in CGI? If nasa can only show the distance of the moon in an animated depiction, a cartoon, how on earth can anyone believe nasa can see the surface of the sun, according to theory, 390 times as far?

Again, not a single measurement or shred of data exists.

Now notice the image of this “sun” is quite detailed, according to animation, cartoon, drawing, CGI. It is a depiction, not video. From what is the depiction derived if there is no visual? It is imagined, a lie. From whose mind did this imagination come? I believe the surface of the sun looks like Kamala harris’ cheese face. I imagine it, and now I CGI it. How stupid can NASA get to think their whacko theories and imaginations fool people.

D’oh, they fool some.

If the depiction drives from a photo or video clip, why not publish the photo or video clip? Is the answer obvious to you? There is no reality to the imagined pretense. There is absolutely no reality to any visual of the sun.

Please take note that it is two very different things to see the sun’s rays lighting up the world, but quite another thing to see the surface of the sun. It is one thing to feel warmth coming from some unknown distance, but it is impossible for mankind to develop a camera or instrument of any kind, to see the sun, 93 million, 93,000,000 miles away,

CRITICAL RACE THEORY: ONE THEORY COMPARED WITH OTHER THEORIES, AND GIVEN A FAIR SHARE OF INSTRUCTION AS OTHER THEORIES.

Bill Maher, moments of cognizance.

Surely he will argue that point. Call it my opinion. I have heard Bill Maher lie and lie.

However, today I write, report, that Bill Maher, a proponent of the left-wing bolshevik rhetoric, not necessarily true, made some keen observations one would not expect from dem/lib movements, particularly, the dumbing down of Americans through a dissembled, subjugated de-education system.

Bill Maher referred to and played a ticktock video clip of questions asked of Americans. “What is the biggest city in the world?”, is one such question.

The answers were, Asia, Europe, Brazil, and others, maybe some actually citing a city.

Maher’s words following are an expose that even the bolshevik-left realizes their dismantling and destruction of real education is a reality.

Maher states: “…so you tell me, if a country is only as strong as its people what can the future possibly hold for a population this moronic, being a full grown adult and thinking a human could walk on the sun? Or that the biggest city in the world as Asia. This country simply has no education standards anymore. They will let you out of a public high school and give you a diploma and you don’t actually have to know anything, which used to be the mission of schools, knowing things.”

Maher was referring to Critical Race Theory, as opposed to actual education of “…knowing things”, and he continued that our children do not know anything.

Controlling ignorant populations is always a construct of left-wing, boshevik/dementocrat tyranny, and Maher has noticed.

I have a number of simple questions, for many issues, that left-wing dementocrat, bolshevik drones constantly refuse to answer, address, or even allow to be discussed. Hence we see ruling, un-representative governing bodies, such as education boards, having parents removed from the lives of their own children.

Why is a theory taught in schools as if it were the ultimate issue, the only theory and irrefutable truth? Why is Critical Race Theory taught, imposed, lived, and forced upon our children when it is only a theory? What opposing, or related theories should have equal representation and time as CRT?

I have been investigating heliocentric (globe) theory versus flat, plane(t) earth for a number of years now. I have been kicked off Facebook numerous times, suspended, for arguing, fighting, delivering the same tone and vocabulary as those with whom I fight, while they are not suspended.

I have a question that seems to draw the ire of all heliocentric model believers: If the earth is a globe, why do photos show a flat horizon at any shore of a large body of water?

To explain this in geometric terms, if one claims he or she can see a curve looking out to sea, as a ship, for example, moving away from shore, appears to roll over the curve of the earth and “sink” why is this same curve not seen looking across that same view, in fact, where the distance is greater?

If we, mankind, has been into space, why are there no photos of earth from space?

You might well argue that there are. Might I point out that there are CGIs, models, composites, drawings, art and much related but not one single photo.

In fact, the dearth of photos of earth from space is starkly accentuated when we consider the latest jaunt into “space” by bozo-bezos an William Shatner.

Do not forget that Shatner is an actor, and acts unreal situations.

In tha fall of 2021, Bozo-bezos and Shatner took a rocket flight into “space”.

Apparently the whole event lasted 11 minutes, and the report is that the, “The rocket launched from Blue Origin’s private facility in West Texas, reaching above 100 kilometers (or more than 340,000 feet altitude) before returning to Earth safely a few minutes later.”

How did it return? Was it in space? Did it actually go into “space”, and turn around and come back?

How does propulsion push against something that isn’t there, the void of “space”, to change direction so it can return?

That is just the beginning of questions regarding a fake flight into “space”, or a flight into fake space.

Two minutes, with all the new technology of today, is all they could manage?

How many seconds of weightlessness did they experience? Weightlessness can be experienced in a jet at any altitude. We call it falling. The same effect can be felt when an elevator drops.

Why no photos?

With all the new technology, advances in rocketry, and apparent photos of earth in 1969, why could these goons not take one photo of earth from space, even with a fish-eye lens? Did they not actually go into “space”?

These are just questions from my immediate thoughts, drawn from recent internet “discussions”, I wonder about these theories. I am certain I will be adding to this list of queries.

Do not forget that the heliocentric model is a theory and at best a model. With perfect lack of photos of earth from “space”, one must remember that the globe earth is a theory and only a theory,

Do not forget that the plane(t) earth as a flat, straight plane is also a theory but not taught or given a 1% effort as the theory of earth as a globe;

Critical race as a theory is given so much time and instruction it is more than a subject in. School. It has actually been instituted as societal fabric: a part of reality that is only theory.

One should be astounded at how recent and oppressive CRT is; how CRT is so recently instituted and augmented, as compared with other theories.: theories that are so ignored they are not even mentioned.

There are in existence theories in opposition to CRTtheory but CR theory has not been questioned in the least. Not even questioned is the reality that CR theory is only theory and opinion.

How about we teach the Bill of Rights and discourses by Thomas Jefferson, Abraham Lincoln, George Washington, all who opined their theories, that proved to be much more than theory? What theories could these possibly be, you ask. Have you read your history? From where does the Bill of Rights originate? What?

The Bill of Rights, you say, is not a theory that challenges CR theory. How would you know if you have not studied, looked, maybe read one page from the public notices that contributed to the Bill of Rights?

Public notices, you ask? The Federalist Papers is a collection of letters written to colonials at the time of the War of Independence, published throughout the colonies. Public discourse, as opposed to demented CR theory hiding from parents’ purview, was popular in those years: very PUBLIC, theorized and discussed at the founding of America.

Read and see for yourselves if the individual rights, described as coming from god, challenge CR theory.

To be fair to all theories, how about the de-eduction system spend a few moments every day teaching possible challenges to CR theory? How about an equal dispensation of time for each theory be allotted asa balanced curriculum? Who wants an imbalanced curriculum?

Would it be possible to return to a class of basic civics and critical ice theory be given a proper place, a theory with as much given it as other theories? Wait, what a basic civics class?

Do you realize students in America were taught basic civics? What happened, where did civics lessons go? The deranged bolshevik dementocrats eliminated civil, and math, and geometry, and biology, and health.

Did you not know this? When the demented education boards teach that 2 plus 2 can equal five, you must realize math is gone.

Please, take note that I purposely identify and accentuate that this CRT is identified by the authors themselves as theory. Being a theory it deserves much much less attention than things such as, why can people not walk on the sun and what are the big cities of the world?

THREE STRIKES AND GLOBE-GOONIES ARE OUT: CHRIS NATION, ART GILLES AND DANIEL D. SMITH

Unbelievable, astounding science-based, logical, deductive and super-intellectual responses from the NASA paid political agents proving NASA’s integrity and “science”.

The “points” and “logic” of these perfectly sound and witty comments has sent me reeling, feeling lost, beaten, alone and drifting in the world. I am now quite certain, with the irrefutable points these intelligence superstars have made, that my view of the world has changed.

First up to bat, Chris Nation. Chrissy’s words of wit:

“Yes…very funny indeed…”

Can anyone tell us to what chris nation is referring?

Second batter, Art Gilles:

“bite down harder”

Wow, another astounding point made in favor of globe-earth theory. I am suffering, sweltering with embarrassment at how silly my scientific methodology is compared to the ….dare I say, gawd-like talent evinced by bolshevik-dick, arty.

Third bolshevik-dick, I mean, third batter, daniel d. smith. May I add, so precious is little cutie’s lie it is funny dick-dan writes. Dan-dick’s comment:

“Watch it again and start to really look at the video. The guy in red you can clearly see is an edited video but some conspiracy nutjob forget to edit out the wire as you can see it floating which means he would not have “dropped” that thing that fast.

It’s all edited to disprove nasa for the narrative of a flat earth.”

“and start to really look….”? Dick-daniel is just too lost from reality to even get language close. Did dick write… “Start to…”? Why not just simply go to the NASA website and get the source? Deflect and distract, dick-daniel, the bolshevik sub-intelligent goon “leader”. LOL. Danielsan-dick is the leader of the goon squad, and there are more.

More from me, intellect connected to gawd…

hahahahaha, dick-daniel, digging and digging, running while he sets his air on fire with anger, like the others. No picture of earth from “space”…., NOT ONE, EVER, just dig and lie, and distract and lie, and deflect and lie and lie and lie and lie. What a loser!

Can somebody verify the source of the video in question….is NOT, NAAAAAAAAAWT a plane(t) earth edit? Doesn’t that video come from NASA itself, and danny-dick knows it and LIES like a filthy bolshevik-whore!

D’oh, did daniel bolshevik-dick forget that very, VERRRRRRY important fact, FAAAAAAAACT?

I got your back d-man. See your profile up at my site, giving you all the props you deserve.

Conspiracy….? Too funny. Only loser libs, progressive bolsheviks, and globe-earth theorists accuse others of conspiracy. And so what! THAT very vid, the one dicky-dan claims is edited by a “flat-earther” is the one posted at NASA. Let me repeat that for all investigating and those who want to know the depth of the disgusting sub-human bolshevik scum, globe-earth theorist daniel-dick bolshevik: THE VERY SAME ONE POSTED ON THE NASA SITE.

Three strikes boys. You’re outta here!

Send the next three goons. A song comes to mind…”Send in the Clowns” Next line, “…don’t bother, they’re here.

FAKE GLOBE-EARTH THEORY PROFILE: GREG DAVIS’ COMMENT AND MY REPLY

Greg Davis: “you’re not a scientist. I’ve already shut you down effortlessly. You’re just a lonely guy looking to feel important. I know your type very well. I study it. If you actually want to talk about something real, our deal still stands. I will reward you with information on one point, and a fun sticker, for every direct question you engage on-topic with a direct answer. If you’re not up for that, or simply cannot, then don’t bother speaking again. This is a discussion forum, designed to facilitate intelligent conversation about specific topics relating to the shape of the earth. It’s not a free-for-all to perpetuate insults and hate by miserable cockroaches. That is all”

My reply:

A legend in your own mind. Shut me down, with what, CGI and drawings? How would you know I am not a scientist when you do not know the first thing about experimentation, scientific methodology, or even the language of science? You are morally and cause-and-effect backward.

How do you presume to know I am a lonely guy? Who the hell do you think you are? You trailer-trash loser presumptuous lying piece of rat crap.

You have nothing, not even a real profile. What did you provide that shut me down? Make a point, loser! How many laboratory experiments have you engineered and conducted? You can’t even speak science terminology you are so uselessly uneducated. Well, I have a pic of your profile and will publish it with your stupid words and my reply. Not even sure what loser point you think you made, but the fundamentals escape your limited lying mind. There is no science when there is no data, no observaion, and without an actual photo there is no beginning of science for globe-theory.

Globe-theory cannot even be called that until an observation is made, and there is nothing, and you know it you lying treasonous bolshevik bastard.

Can you not wrap your little mind around that reality, or are you that sick and twisted to lie to such sick extent? Wait for it, wait for it: liberalnewsreview.com

FAKE GLOBE-EARTH THEORY PROFILE: ROGER BARNETT COMMENT AND MY REPLY, 1/10/22

Barnett: “The earth’s shape is not a theory. it’s been known for millenia and has been quantified to closer and closer tolerances as time and scientific advances progress. FE? Bwahaa…. It’s nonsensical drivel..or dribble for those that foam it out their mouthes.”

Scores and scores of fake profiles all doing nothing but post fake-science, amazingly all in favor of globe-theory earth. Something is surely going on that brings so many ignorant goons together to propagate so many, and all the same, lies.

My Reply:

Known by whom? What tolerances? Barnett has no idea, surely regurgitating spew from his/her/its master handler. Again, Roger, tell us, what tolerances? What is the margin of error? Tell us what scientific progress it is that uses CGI and drawings to make a fake photo of earth, when nobody has ever been “in space”? You lying pos. Known by whom, Aristotle, Heracles, Herodotus, Jason and the Argonauts, Dustin the wind? What a loser! Nobody has known for millennia. What a sewage-sucking fraud! It is that simple.

For all reading this, by many things bolshevik-dick wrote, you can surely see how ignorant and un-scientific everything of dick-roger’s comment is. But, especially and specifically obvious is this: how does one “quantify” something that is not a quantity?

Known for millennia? Who are you trying to fool? Even the dumbest of dumb, you anti-science, scientific methodology retards cannot be so stupid to totally ignore reality AND history. Are you really so stupid and grotesquely, fat, ugly and lying!

Your stupid pretense (millennia) is not only a stretch of gross magnitude, considering the Bible has been around for millennia, but even you, a real pseudo-person cannot be that stupid to ignore the reality that globe-theory is a theory. Do you realize that when someone says a word they mean it, like theory means theory?

But it is okay. I get where you are coming from and I have a picture of your “profile” and will post it to my site, with my reply, a shit-kicking for you for all to see, and beyond so others can see just how fake and politically motivated, sub-human you filthy bolshevik NASA agents are. You lie like a rat you filthy rotten agent provocateur.

EXISTENTIAL CHINESE SUPERSONIC MISSILE PROVIDES OPPORTUNITY FOR CLARIFICATION OF SCIENTIFIC METHODOLOGY

“China has a missile that was previously thought impossible”

Yes, China has a missile nobody thought could be created, but there is evidence it can exist; that it could have been created. This evidence is observation that other missiles exist and technology applied and working in other areas has a potential to be applied to create supersonic missile technology.

This is the first phase of scientific methodology: observation.

The theory of flying bombs is more than just theory. “Flying” bombs exist. We know it. In science terminology, we call this observation. Predicting, another phase of science, is extending already observed realities using existing technology, not theory. This makes an extension of known observations possible and believable.

This extension is not possible where there is no observation such as fake disciplines of climate changeling and “space” travel/globe-theory.

Again, theory based on theory is bad theory and can predict absolutely nothing except silly imagination.

This fertilization of imagination-based theory is the core of modeling in “science” today, particularly climate changeling and globe-earth theory and “space” travel/globe-theory.

If all one can produce is unobservable imagination of modeling and fake theory based on unsubstantiated theory, then one has nothing. When theory is based on theory, there is no evidence from which a reality can be extrapolated. This is climate changeling today, and globe-eath/space speculation.

All one need to do, to observe the unobservable climate-changeling and “space travel/globe-theory theories, is to pay attention to the words of those who promote: “models”.

DEM/LIB POLITICAL AGENTS JUST CANNOT HIDE THEIR HATRED AND INCAPACITY TO CONTROL THEMSELVES: FACEBOOK RESPONSE DECEMBER 21 2021

Update, January 9, 2022: I have been taking pictures of profiles of those with whom I contend. I went back to find Monty’s profile, GONE!

It is time to not just boycott craigslist. It is time to interfere and destroy. I ask all those who do not use craigslist to go to craigslist and flag everything and anything. Flag for five minutes every day. It is too bad that there are innocent people that will be compromised, but better they find out now, and find better, ethical advertising. The owners/administrators of CL are evil, liars, haters of mankind, suppressing truth so evil can control.

I apologize for not copying Monty Skreeder’s original comment, found on facebook. Hopefully a rough idea of his twisted argument can be extrapolated from what I present in this one-sided commentary. There are so many comments by “people” without profiles. They are political profiles.

I hesitate to do this because I do not want the bolsheviks to get information that provides feedback that facilitates their capacities to change and improve their evil tactics. But, it has been my experience they can’t adapt anyway, being so stuck in their narratives and lies.

However, I bring this to your attention so you can test and grade future “discussions”.

Monty Skreeder got stuck, like a skipping record, he could not stop yakking about Trump. Do you see the absolute ignorant hatred? The dementocrat bolsheviks whip themselves into a frenzy of hate, and cannot control themselves. Their hate makes them act like dogs that just cannot stop barking at their own shadows.

Bolshevik-dick, Monty Skreeder, whatever, mainlined a hold on one point, and one point only, while I injected scores of points. Like a dumb bulldog, he could not let go, and it was/is his destruction. More than losing a discussion, being so caught up in one lie, one pretentious interpretation that he thinks dispels all other Constitutionalist interpretations, MS bleeds himself before the totalitarian centralized government globalist bolshevik movement, to destruction. Yes, that is a mouthful, but they are all connected. Organic Act of 1871 is one such example of the globalist evil seizing control of OUR country, with international banker/gangster fiat money.

MS, like all liars, thinks that if he can win one point of an argument or discussion, lying primarily to himself, it can be deduced the losing point of the opposing view, means the opposing view lied en toto, thus, that all claims are lies. I know this because it is the pattern and obvious goal one notices after hundreds, literally, of “discussion” with these moral misfits.

That is all the boneheads have, and it is not enough. You all see the numerous points I made, and still make while all that goon had was hatred. Look at the very last sentence of MS’s most recent comment… ‘hate Trump’.

I hesitate to admit this was a trap for the demented goon, like other goons that come and go. MS is like the monkey that puts its hand in a narrow necked vase to pull out a piece of fruit and when chased, will not, or does not have the brain capacity, to release the fruit that holds the monkey’s hand in the vase, that slows it from escaping.

Ms could not release his grip on one minor detail because it was connected to his hatred and his lies, and most important, his hope for winning on all points by default. Not gonna happen. MS could not, maybe cannot, escape his illogical insistence that his view, researched by a simpleton’s google, discarding the majority of constitutionalist interpretations, is lacking credibility and rationale. You decide.

This is not going to be easy for you. The enemies to your freedom and your right to choice and self-determination are at stake, and discerning your friends from foe is not going to be easy, but it must be done. Anybody who “gives” you freedom, can take it, and that is why tyranny lies and flatters, and then seizes, enslaves and kills. Where do you and yours want to be?

If my words and my “side” is as dangerous as dick claims, you had better know, and know how to avoid. But that is not the actual issue. The real challenge is YOU, knowing, from any source, real or fake, what is truth and who you can trust.

Again, READ and learn.

Abraham Lincoln, the great emancipator of ALL Americans, was asked how he studied and prepared for debate. He said he studied his opponent’s argument at least twice as much as his own. He needed to learn his opponent’s weaknesses, like you need to know your enemies’ conceit and fraud. I have laid much of it out for you. But, again, your freedom is yours to acquire and yours alone, or it belongs to those who deceive you.

I am sure this is not over. The bolsheviks never cease. Be ready, yourselves, to fight, or you will find yourselves in the clutches and control of the wrong “people”

A ONE DEGREE DEVIATION DUE TO SO-CALLED CURVATURE OF THE EARTH

Let us look at an object directly out to sea from a beach position.. There is a problem that most do not see. If the circumference of the earth is 24,901 miles, then a one degree deviation would be 69.17 miles, 360 degrees making up a whole circle, or globe.

Every experiment shown on youtube and elsewhere, that I have seen, states that there are numerous degrees of “drop” within a much smaller distance. The ratio is 1 degree to every 69.17 miles. For every 69.17 miles you travel there is only a one degree deviation, or drop.

Can you see a one degree deviation at almost 70 miles?

My observation is that, at 70 miles the drop would be one degree. One degree divided by 360 degrees produces a ratio of 0.00278 to one. So if a ship is 200 feet tall only 0.00278 of it should disappear: 0.556 feet, at 69.71 miles.

A building of 500 feet, at a full 69.71 miles out, such as one used in one of many observations, should drop out of sight by only 0.00278 X 500 or about 1.389 feet.

When many explain that such and such a thing on the horizon drops due to curvature, they use a ratio from nowhere.

In the following youtube video:

the producer claims much of a wind turbine 29 nautical miles from shore has been lost from sight, as he presents, almost half of its height. I am astonished at how anti-mathematical this producer is. He claims he is looking at a wind turbine that is 29 nautical miles from the beach on which he stands. 29 nautical miles converts to 33.35 miles. At 33.35 miles the curvature of the earth would be less than one half of one degree: 33.35/69.17, or .482 degrees.

Even if the windmill is as tall as he claims it could be, 180 meters, or 590.4 feet, at less than one half of one percent of drop, the windmill should only disappear 590 feet X 0.00278 feet per 69.17 mile distance, X .482 + .7864 feet. This is about 9 inches.

We see a lot more distortion than a mere drop, over 33.35 miles,

It is impossible that a distance of 33.15 miles produces such a drastic drop in elevation. Clearly there is a different variable involved.

If we were to triangulate and look at a ship moving away from a point would we se the tilt of the mast way from the beach location, for example, due to curvature? Incidentally, I have never seen a study or experiment that tests this.

If I were to stand 33.35 miles away from the point on the beach in a line perpendicular to the line of sight of the original position, would I be able to see the mast tilt away from the beach? The distance I would be making my observation would be much more, but only due to angle of observation. Would I now see less than .482 of a degree of tilt from well over 33.35 miles? The hypotenuse would be 1.414 times the distance from the original beach point or 47.16 miles. How could one tell with the tossing of waves and ship?

If I could see that far I would only be looking for a 33.35/69.71 ratio of one degree of dip, or tilt of the mast. It is imperceptible. Furthermore, the angle is less due to the angle away from direct observation, which would be directly to the side of the windmill.

In the producer’s example he shows the windmill clearly losing half its height. Impossible.