WE HAVE BEEN DECEIVED IN EVERYTHING

We have been deceived in everything.

Today, April 16 2020, like many other days, before going outside I looked at the temperature on my phone. Currently, at 9:45 AM, it reads 37 degrees. I wondered how it could be snowing outside.

I received a notification on my phone that FOX NEWS was interviewing Kellyanne Conway, a Trump advisor.

The interview began with Bill De Blasio, Mayor of New York City, explaining, “If we act the wrong way, jump too soon, then we could see a resurgence…so we get one chance to get it right.”

Is this a political message or a pseudo-science democrat party fabrication? Who says we only get one chance?

Do we dare trust politicians who have used models and modelers who have gotten nothing right?

Fauci was involved with HIV/AIDS when it began. Still no vaccine, no cure, just treatment. He has never been good at his job and now Trump trusts this buffoon and all the other modelers brought over from global hoaxing?

De Blasio is not his name. He is of German descent. He changed his name to deceive New Yorkers.

What an assault on truth. I cannot reveal my sources, sorry, peoples’ lives and jobs are at stake, but covid does not exist in epidemic and certainly not pandemic, degrees. I know of two nurses in different cities that told me they are under instruction, command to report anything as covid-19 that has similar signs and symptoms as the so-called covid. They re forced to report everything that slightly resembles covid-19 signs and symptoms, even when tests show negative. That is one huge fraud.

De Blasio, the Cuomo morons, Utah gov herbie stalin, and others are part of the hoax. I have wondered about Trump since he took office.

De Blasio openly lied about many things in that 15 second clip. Who is “we”? Is he talking about the medical profession and politicos who have worked so hard to deceive Americans?

We have been classically conditioned to believe that some professions are above others, above the regular working “taxpayers” (how I hate that commie/bolshevik term), and that we should give our unreserved, irrepressible love and support to the medical profession, because they ravage America and kill so efficiently.

CNBC, February 22, 2018 reported the third leading cause of death in the United States is medical error.

https://www.cnbc.com/2018/02/22/medical-errors-third-leading-cause-of-death-in-america.html

Do doctors and medicos know this? Do nurses offer a caveat, disclaimer or warning when people step into the hospital? Are some nurses dishonest? No, heavens no. The medical profession is absolute. The medical profession is not run by the pharmaceutical companies, right Bernie Sanders, democrats?

Democrats attack corporations especially pharmaceutical (evil) corporations for the fraud and ravaging heaped upon America. True or fabricated by the bolshevik democrat party and liberals, it matters not that they attack to destroy everything that does not fit their goal of world domination through centralized government control.

It can be said I took a stab at the dem/libs, and it is true, but it was done to show the near absolute compliant forced ideological oppression of the ignorant democrat party masses.

The democrats know pharmakaia, the pharmaceutical companies, are rotten to the core and now, even now, they defer to the ravaging, dishonesty and lying of big pharma, during this fabricated crisis. Where is the famed democrat and liberal sense of indignation and distrust for covid-19 as an inherent evil of an evil corporations, as a spawn of big pharma?

Are democrats so dronish they follow their leaders in switching ideologies at the drop of a face mask?

To believe a corrupt medical profession, advising political appointees; political agents, in effect, who report from a pharmaceutical perspective of deception, on any aspect of this ruse, is insanity.

There is no way the whole chain of command can suddenly be honest.

This is like the story of the frog and the scorpion.

The scorpion asks the frog for a ride across the pond. The frog replies, ‘Are you crazy,? You will sting me.” The scorpion reassures the frog it really is not in his interest to sting the frog because it, along with the frog, would drown. The frog, obliges and the scorpion stings the frog when they are almost to the shore. As they both drown the frog asks the scorpion, ‘Why did you do that? Why did you kill both of us?’

The scorpion’s reply, I am a scorpion, it is what I do. You knew I was a scorpion. did you think I was not going to be a scorpion thoughout?’

You see, the scorpion is a scorpion and the scorpion cannot help but be a scorpion. The scorpion is an incorrigible scorpion, like liars are liars.

The medical profession, a part of pharma, cannot help but be agents for pharma, so lies are part of the medical profession because they are part of the big dirty, corrupt lying pharmaceutical government-corporate conglomerate. Pharma cannot help itself. Like the scorpion it lies because it cannot stop from being a lying industry. The medical industry, being a part of it, cannot stop itself from being itself, and constantly deceive and lie as well.

So, why do we believe this covid scare has any integrity, especially when it derives from a creation of two well known lying sources?

Read some of my posts regarding my brushes with dangerously stupid doctors.

There is no way there is not lying at some level in all this chain of political doctoring. I would estimate there is gross deception at most levels and slight deception in the rest: deception through and through.

“How reality based is May 1st Kelyanne?”, asked the reporter.

Conway replied, “For some places it certainly can be a reality, if testing is available, if your infection rates are low, your death rates are low, if low hospital capacity is there, including ventilators and medical personnel beds, beds in the ICU. All that is taken into account because the President has made…”

The President has made numerous assumptions from liars in big pharma and the failed CDC, or Trump is part of the deceptive seizing of control over everyone.

Conway’s answer would be more correct if she injected the variable of dishonesty pharma and medicos cannot help but repeat.

Her answer would read, ‘For some places, but not really, if testing is available and the professionals don’t lie  and hospital administrations don’t lie; if your infection rates are not lies or fraudulent under fear of being fired; your death rates due to heart failure, diabetes, “flu” signs and symptoms, influenza, are not reported as the real causes; if hospitals are allowed to transform units to serve the needs of the ill, instead of laying off staff in other care units; if low hospital capacity means cool photo opportunities and propaganda pictures are good; if low hospital capacity can be hidden as a reality, if low hospital capacity can be underreported or not reported at all, then we can certainly let non-victims of covid-19 media melee live their lives…..

I could go on and on.

Democrats should surely believe this because the attacks on Trump from dem/libs for three years, is thatTrump is not qualified or he is absolutely corrupt. Suddenly, to democrat party supporters, Trump has credibility. Why? Is it because the media is giving credibility to the lying medicos and CDC losers-at-every-challenge?

I am speculating regarding where and who. The reality is the medical professionals are liars because they are part of a big conglomerate deception. So, all the conditions Conway lists are inapplicable because the numbers are dead wrong fabrications from an incorrigible source: big pharma, medical industry and government losers.

There is no reality to anything coming from the media regurgitating lies from sources everyone knows are ravaging liars. How many people have been killed in the last 20 years by medico error, millions?

20,000 deaths due to covid is a drop in the bucket compared with medical error deaths. If pharma and medicos care not for the millions who have died, what makes anyone, including lying loser liberal media, think they care for the lives they are taking now? 

We are deceived, blatantly lied to about global warming. How is it possible that it snows when it is 37 degrees?

Again, only to the naiive and trusting drones do these two signs of totalitarianism seem disconnected. To those who intend to rule and “cleanse” “their” earth, these are connected because they made it so.

Last night, April 15th, I stepped outside and discovered it was colder than I thought. I went back into the house and looked at my phone. The weather report said it was 50 degrees. I walked over to my window where there is a thermometer and read it at 45 degrees. I took out a thermometer and walked outside away from the house and vehicles, and set it on a tree stump, the back insulated from the stump with a dry cloth.

When I looked ten minutes later the thermometer read 45 degrees.

Why are we being lied to about weather? Who is doing it?

Remember people who lie have to lie to cover something they cannot report or state with surety of truth.

Is it all just a mistake. One day last year it snowed in Murray at 39 degrees.

Has snow changed? If so, why has it not been studied, investigated and reported? No conclusions are forthcoming. Maybe there are no conclusions because the conclusions do not support the political agenda of global warming and apocalyptic meltdown.

Covid sure helps distract from this but by the summer’s end, mid August, the global hoaxers will claim this has been the warmest year on record, for 10 years in a row, now. Morons, killing people.

HOW DOES ONE EXPLAIN THE EXTREMELY COLD 2020 WINTER AND UNUSUALLY COLD MONTH OF MARCH?

HOW DOES ONE EXPLAIN THE EXTREMELY COLD 2020 WINTER AND UNUSUALLY COLD MONTH OF MARCH?

How does one explain the extremely cold winter of 2020 and unusually cold month of March?

I call it Covid-19 distraction. Is anybody talking about oceans rising when the so-called extreme heat is gone and the cold makes the ocean level drop? It doesn’t actually do that, nobody has shown how silly climate-change hoaxing observations connect to unobserved effects.

How do dem/libs explain this unusually, very long cold spell? Covid-19, distraction. Is anybody talking about record high temperatures when we have had years of declining average temperatures, and this spring is the coldest we have experienced in decades? The average daily highs for every day in March were 10 to 20 degrees below average. Nobody has shown how silly climate change observations connect to never shown claims of effects.

How do some people explain the quiet, almost non-existent claims that we, the human race and the world have only 7 years to reverse this “heat” and climate change? Covid-19, distraction from reality.

To most people politics is not involved in everything. Most people cannot accept that there are people who will kill, slaughter, lie cheat and steal for gain. Politicians, the democrats in Congress, exploited a politically-fabricated situation and added a fat juicy raise for themselves and their minions, the unelected, non-governmental agencies and democrat/liberal/progressive institutions the democrats need to feed to stay in power.

Politicians connect all these issues and fools refuse to see how one seemingly unrelated distraction is actually the effect of a different cause from the same source.

Again, it is all politics.

Covid-19 does not exist except where it has been reported and effects of different causes have been used.

Governor Cuomo and “fredo”, his mentally deranged, goofy brother reporter suddenly started telling the truth?

Liars lie, they always lie.

There are numerous links in reporting cause of death.

When a person goes into an emergency waiting room and fills out forms there is a lull, a wait. S person in very difficult situations would be seen as in dire need and rushed to care. A person with a gunshot wound, for example, bleeding, potentially close to passing, is observed and rushed. Covid-19 “sufferers” are not seen in emergency rooms as dire need cases. The “victim” fills out forms and waits, unless of course breathing is difficult, dire need potential of dying.

A wait ensues if there are cases ahead. Eventually a doctor sees the patient but if not in emergency surgery the doctor follows protocol. Asks questions, checks lymph nodes, looks in eyes, ears, throat, checks temperature (usually nurse does that) and prescribes a “cold” remedy. The case is then reviewed and assumed Covid because the doctors are instructed, in many states and regions, to “play it safe”. Play iy safe presumptions are lazy ways of claiming overload and a political agenda. To politicians all things, all issues and calamities are connected. They are connected by politicians’ lies. But, not all politicians lie and see connections. We call these few politicians, representatives.

The third link is follow up. So many have died of covid-19, the claims report, but again, there is never a link shown and the fact is usually just a claim. Have the 8,000 or so deaths, due to covid-19, been proven as a result of covid-19, by autopsy?

The fourth link, hospitalization just in case, just to observe, and assume it is covid-19. LIES presented as physical reality, therefore presented as truth of another infection. LIES, tricks by liars.

All death is by cardiac arrest. Pneumonia causes constricted oxygen flow, and the brain and heart die. The brain can die and the body survive, if the heart keeps pumping. Covid-19 does not cause anything that makes cardia arrest. Covid-19, a ghost virus, is said to cause flu-like symptoms, which means it is a flu. A person who shows signs of carina arrest, and then has a heart stoppage, is actually in cardiac arrest. It is not kidney failure.

How many people in New York city, for example, have not died of flu because it is presumed, by a dishonest politician and his corrupt brother reporter, at a fake news agency, both “working” together (Cuomo brothers) to create an effect they cannot show is actual and cannot show is a result of the cause a handful claim exists?

The CDC can throw a picture of a “virus” and claim it is anything. Who knows the difference? Are CDC scientists like global hoaxing scientists? Maybe they are the same people who present observations and show no connection to an effect they claim exists?

Are people actually dying of this ghost-virus covid-19? No.

Quo bono? Always look for crime where someone benefits. Politicians have America in lock-down, destroying our lives and pursuit of happiness, and they gain, by writing fat raises for themselves and their supporters: fake representative processes they feign.

UTAH GOVERNOR, GARY HERBERT COLLABORATES WITH GLOBAL TYRANNY SEIZING UNAUTHORIZED CONTROL

UTAH GOVERNOR, GARY HERBERT COLLABORATES WITH GLOBAL TYRANNY SEIZING UNAUTHORIZED CONTROL

I warned people about the American Governors’ Association 20 years ago.

Does anyone remember Governor Leavitt traipsing off to Governors’ Association meetings and bringing evil to Utah? Of course not. To begin with, most did not see the evil ritual he brought to Utah because the liberal media presented it as a wonderful celebration of success.

Leavitt presented Steve Young with an award, for no reason except to inject a satanic ritual into our lives. Leavitt presented Young with the “Seven Points of Light” Award.

This award is an illuminati award. The award presentation is a Satanic ritual, in addition to the award being of diabolical origins. We trace the illuminati to Medieval Europe, and before that to Khazaria. Khazaria has almost been written out of history because much of the evil and many of the world’s evil people have Khazarian origins. Khazaria traces its society and culture to ancient Babylon and the practice of child sacrifice: priesthood of Moloch.

I stated many times before, in articles years ago, that King Solomon, of biblical jurisprudence and godly remembrance (building a Temple of the God of the Hebrews), had 800 wives and concubines for a reason.

Are there any records of Solomon’s children from 800 wives and concubines?

We know Solomon was chastised of God, as the scriptures record, for worshiping  other gods. Amongst these gods was Moloch. From Moloch we also get the black robes of the courts.

The blood-letting of children, particularly babies is traced to ancient blood sacrifice.

The bolsheviks were Khazarian. Some Khazarians remained separate from the masses who, after years, decades and centuries became indigents of the various city states and countries.

The bolsheviks seized Russia in a way that democrats today have idolized and mimicked. Bolsheviks slaughtered an estimated 30 million Russians as part of their sacrificial rise to power. It is Satanic and even Ancient Babylonian practices go back to a more sinister reporting than the Bible gives, of the Tower of Babel and Nimrod.

The bolsheviks changed names, co-opted languages and infiltrated every country in a bid to take control of the whole world. The goal was, and still is, to have unlimited human sacrifice. The bolsheviks came to America as Jews”, although they truly did not have Jewish blood. Most Jews today, especially those from Eastern Europe, are not actually Jewish.

Bolsheviks changed language everywhere they went to hide their origins and goals. In America they were first known as liberals, flip-flopping the meaning of liberal from the Latinate root of liber, meaning free of (government) oppression and control. They changed it to expanded government, government that inherently controls and is ever expanding the number and percentage of citizens it commands. The invaders called themselves progressives, liberals and eventually communists, and today, they are all the aforementioned. They have tricked the masses. They speak of socialism as if it were actually sharing the wealth with the masses. Socialism is not social. It is the biggest fraud heaped upon mankind.

It surely is hard to believe but we have blatant and open forces in America trying to institute child sacrifice. Gary Northam, governor of Virginia, has advocated open murder of babies who have survived late term, birth canal abortions. The vampires of the democrat party are truly sub-human but the masses are led to believe there is great support for the barbaric practices democrats, socialists, communists, tyrants and the governor’s oligarchy have executed and tried to entrench and expand.

This evil; this child-sacrifice and blood sacrifice, indirectly, is Leavitt, and all the progeny, the evil satanic disciples of the Priesthood of Moloch. Gary Herbert walked into this Satanic web knowing what he was and is doing.

I have much more to say, write, but this message of seizure and destruction of our first amendment rights needs to be exposed now.

Don’t just say no to the governors’ oligarchy seizing totalitarian control, fight. Now is when we fight. If the military is of such cowardice they will go along with barbarism, then they deserve their just rewards.

Evil always oppresses and always accomplishes near totalitarian hegemony, but never once in the history of the world has totalitarianism been complete. And it will not accomplish this in our day.

I am not a sender of youth and others to fight, like the cowardly democrat and republican (in name only) agents of evil. Saturday night, March 21st, 2020, I had a party at my house with a lot of people.

When I go, almost every morning, to my favorite Starbucks, I get my coffee and sit on the curb and try to engage people in social un-distancing.

You, my dear friends, would be surprised at how many people, without actually investing to learn much by way of statistics, numbers and facts, believe this corona virus is a scam.

Live, everyone as if Governor Herbert’s “orders” are not orders, and return to life. Treat Herbert as he should be treated and respected, as an agent of illuminati genocide. Herbert is willingly evil, playing the role of the nicer republican oriented governor who cares for Utahns.

This attack on our rights to assemble is just what the bolshevik democrats, progressives, liberals and global tyrannies have been trying to fro for decades. Herbert is the enemy and needs to be treated as such.

Do not die, mentally speaking, with this fabricated attack on YOU!

Global warming pre and post test measurements and data. Written 6/21/16

Global warming pre and post test measurements and data.
A real scientist would look at NOAA and the la-la-land liberal fabrications and ask, where is the pre-test? Where is the post test? Where is the control group or control data, and where is the test subject or data?
Did NOAA have satellite pictures back in 1880? Did NOAA take water temperatures in the middle of the Pacific ocean in 1880?
Why the pretense of comparatives? Is it an attempt to trick fools and drones into believing there was data to compare with, way back then?
NOAA admitted some time ago the data that scientists collected over a century ago was flawed. It was a theory, and is still just a theory. The standards and measures for lengths and temperatures is still the original standards, so how could the science have been flawed then?
If NOAA, and the fake NASA site claim the data collected 100 years ago is flawed, why did they adjust everything down? If there is a two percent to four percent margin of error (the standard in science) the data can be adjusted either way. Margin of error accounts for adjustments both ways. Real scientists would know that, and proceed with that scientific methodology, regardless of the outcome. Not so with NOAA. Why? Why does NOAA adjust only to their predetermined agenda? It must be a predetermined agenda otherwise NOAA would have employed real scientific methodology and treated data with a margin of error to correct for either deviance. They refused to do what scientists do.
Did NOAA have satellites in the 1880s, or did they send out a crew daily to measure the ocean surface temperatures in the middle of the pacific? That must have been one hell of a chain of row boats.
A chain of row boats, with the original standards and measures would have been much more accurate, being in the moment when the norms and standards were established, rendering the most pretentious scientific, liberal, political assault on science and technology in the future, moot.
The audacity of these moronic-sub-scientists to think they are more qualified to adjust the standards and measures today of those that made them scores and hundreds of years ago, is astounding.
Every time I go to the sites and check the claims (not even theories), of these buffoon dem/libs, I have to laugh.
It is like mickey mouse, a cartoon, writing a science fiction novel, and dem/libs guffawing and harrumphing when someone asks if the writer is a cartoon. “Oh no, he’s real, they claim, he’s a fact, its true that cartoons can come to life.”
How utterly moronic can these stupid dem/libs get?
And then the pigs, the slovenly mutts, flag, remove and criticize my posts. They attack and allow me, and truth itself, no defense. That is just sick. It is sick, psycho, liberal pseudo-science.
What do we expect from neanderthal scientists, measuring the heat of a volcano by jumping in? Actually they measure it by throwing someone else in, or convincing the ignorant masses to jump in for a free phone.
Morons, dem/lib dimwits, science-retards!

FAKE WEATHER REPORT, JUNE 6 2018

FAKE NEWS REPORTING FAKE WEATHER

On June 6, 2018, the weather reports claimed 95 degree heat, in June, is 20 degrees above normal. LIES, fake weather. What is a normal temperature? Is normal an average, or mean temperature. Is normal a measurement of daily average temperatures, or average high temperatures? No. Normal is messing with communication to distract, deceive, and delude, YOU.

How many days of below average high temperatures in May and June did SLC experience? The fake news reported nothing regarding this yet pretends that “normal” is somehow scientific or that comparing normal nothings to one day above average daily highs, is signidicant while ignoring 20 days of below average high temperature recordings.

The fake news reports apples and oranges together as if the confusion of variables was magically “scientific”? Comporting daily mean (average) temperatures with daily average highs or lows, is such a political marmalade of anti-science fake news.

ICE CORE SAMPLES AND STUDY

Regarding a post on Craigslist, on or about October 3rd 2016, my post is as follows:

RE: “For sloppy-brent…”, and “Ice Core samples”.

Wow, that’s a tough one. Ice core samples from 650,000 years ago. Whew, tough. How does utatrdia know? Is it possible, just on the outside chance that this is just a theory? Just musing to myself, just wondering. Does the “study” start with a theory, an idea, a hypothesis (like all experiments), a reference point? Does the study or experiment include a margin of error (like real science does)? A standard margin of error is usually 2 to 4 percent.

Does the author state it as fact or theory?

Who took the ice core samples? Name the scientist and his or her study. NOTHING?

Come on, please, tell us what scientist went to the arctic or antarctic, drilled and took measurements. How deep did he or she, said scientist, go?

Where is the data?

So much constipation of data and reality in this “study”, as usual. One easy argument against is that a two to four percent margin of error is 13,000 to 26,000 years. That is an amazing discrepancy. However, going back so far, by estimating the accuracy of a machine that measure guesstimates, theories, of hundreds of thousands of years, the margin of error would be greater. Any scientist worth anything closely related to credibility, would proffer voluntarily, that his or her experiment or study would include a much higher margin of error, perhaps as high as 10 percent. In this pseudo scientific report that would be 65,000 years. With that margin of error, based on speculations of measuring long-gone time, it is hard to say anything accurately about the so-called data and conclusions.

When has a fabrication from that moron utardia ever been difficult for me to refute? When have I ever failed to expose dem/lib fraud and lies? When have I ever been intimidated or caught telling even one lie? The bolshevik bonehead traitors don’t even try.

Hmmmmm. I could go on with the slaughter but I will just repost the crap-kickings I already handed that lying bolshevik moron, utarda/whatever.

thirdoptbybrent/publius 3,217, utardia/star-twit/editor-predator 0

What a loser!

AAAS AND SCIENTIFIC ORGANIZATIONS CLIMATE CHANGE CONSENSUS LETTER TO CONGRESS

Regarding “consensus” of climate hoaxers.

I went to the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) website.

I have stated many times the dem/lib fabrications and pretentious “science” does not intimidate me. Spending my time fighting dummies and liars, sadly drains my time, but it must be done.

I always close with a bit of regret at being a bully to the child-ids that pretend to be scientists because all they can do is lie, and get caught.

If I could, I would kick the shit out of every single one of those lying, treasonous bastards. Oh, I do it here, every time I refute their lies, and rebuke their fraud and stupidity.

So, I looked at the one that looked the most intimidating. It claimed, Thirty-One Top Scientific Societies Speak with One Voice on Global Climate Change”.

The article starts with, <i><b>“In a consensus letter to U.S. policy-makers, a partnership of 31 leading non-partisan scientific societies…”</i></b>

A consensus letter? This is double talk. A consensus letter that describes a consensus taken from a letter of a consensus…. with no data.

There is nothing except a group of partisan frauds (always the big lie- paid for by democrat party/liberal goons that steal money from Americans and then write letters).

Without a reason or foundation for a claim, the consensus writers stated something had to be done about a something that has no reality. But did the consensus writers write the letter? Do the consensus writers exist?

The article continues with the same dodging and weaving, and avoidance of real material and data. There is no evidence if there is no data. There is no evidence if there is no measurement. There is no evidence if there is no study, or reference to a study, or a thought of a study. This whole fraudulent business of global hoaxing is a dem/lib denial of work. These buffoons, no names, simply sit around and write consensus letters based on nothing. But did they write the letter? Where are the names and references?

I read the whole article. There is not a single reference to a study or a shred, or a tittle; not even a line of notes from a study.

There is a reference to, <i><b>“…independent lines of evidence…”.</i></b>

The second paragraph is unbelievably un-scientific. What moronic scientist would spout about recommendations without a reason?

The second paragraph begins, <i><b>““Observations throughout the world make it clear that climate change is occurring, and rigorous scientific research concludes that the greenhouse gases emitted by human activities are the primary driver,” the collaborative said in its 28 June letter to Members of Congress.”</i></b>

There was no such letter sent to congress.

How about this overgeneralized pretense at research? Try this for clarity of how un-scientific that sentence reveals these morons truly are.

Observations throughout the world make it clear that men over 10 feet tall, are clearly on the rise. Or, Observations throughout the world make it clear that global cooling is occurring. Without a shred of evidence, or a reference to a recorded “observation”, my silly statement is as powerful and credible as the buffoons collectively pretending science. But, again, who are these societies? Did “they” actually write the letter, or the consensus?

Rigorous scientific research concludes that the greenhouse gases emitted by humans… is a lie.

What greenhouse gases do humans emit, oxygen? That is a gas emitted by a greenhouse full of plans that convert carbon dioxide to oxygen.

Humans do not emit greenhouse gases. Greenhouses do not emit greenhouse gases.

There is no such thing as a greenhouse gas. It is not even a rational fabrication that dem/libs have fashioned that proves there is such a thing. It is all speculation, not even a theory yet because it has not been written in a hypothesis or theory: never studied. It has been modeled by politically biased (paid) and partisan frauds (paid democrat party left-wing extremists).

Then the sentence ends with, <i><b>“…the collaborative said…”.</i></b>

A consensus letter with nothing, says nothing, Scientists can say something, but there is not a single name attached. So who is saying?

Go, my fellow Americans and readers; go to a scientific journal or magazine, or site, and look at any article. Look at the references. All have references. A scientist worth anything builds as big a foundation as possible of stable, referenced, factors and variables by referencing studies and conclusions of other scientists. Some real studies have longer lists of references than the article itself. A real scientist revels in his or her connections to references and data and hence, reality. There is not even one single reference in all these bogus sites to study, science, a scientist, a scientific research or variable. There is absolutely nothing to the bogus fabrications found at AAAS, NASA, NOAA, WMO, and TCCS (The Center for Climate and Security). In all those sites I found not one single reference to a study, a scientific variable or even anomaly. The “science” is so bad, these buffoons do not even reference margin of error.

I found nothing on any of the aforementioned, bogus sites, from which a real scientist could establish a foundation for a solid control group or solid control data. Please, my fellow Americans and truth-seekers, go to these sites and find data. Without data there is no conclusions for anything. How can science promote a change when the change requires prior knowledge and desired position? There is nothing to base these bogus claims upon, except political solutions. The political solutions benefit only one class, not We, the People.

Any scientist worth an ounce of credibility surely wants his or her name attached to profound claims of science. Why is there not a single name attached? These scientists do NOT exist. They are names of weather reporters, experts in other fields that have no knowledge their names are being used to promote the words of a few lying liberal writers and fabricators.

We are talking about 5 organizations with multiples of people involved, one would think, but of 5 organizations, all we have is a report by a biased “reporter” claiming 31 organizations collaborated to produce a consensus, based on nothing. That is the REALITY of this whole global hoaxing situation.

What are all these political solutions based on? Are they observations but no measurements; observations but no pretest and post test? All this is based on observations made by nobody. There is nobody in the global hoaxing community that can be called a scientist when there is nobody in the global hoaxing community that can show a scientific reference.

Of all the consensuses, “studies”, “papers”, reports”, “collaborations”, “letters”, there is not one reference to a single measurement. There are conclusions based on absolutely nothing observable because there is nothing to be observed: nothing the dem/lib global hoaxers want made public. In all these papers, consensuses, etc., what was observed? i ask. Show us.

The paragraph ends with, “This conclusion is based on multiple independent lines of evidence and the vast body of peer-reviewed science.” What real scientist reviews a “scientific paper” by a non scientist? A fool or paid interloper, fraud. What true scientist reviews a consensus letter with no scientists attached, no references attached or included, and no data? What scientist would put his or her name to a bogus paper? A real scientist would lose credibility. It is no different than Michael Jordan being asked to review basket ball skills of local soccer sideliner, Pete Bromley, who has never played soccer or basketball in his life. Jordan would laugh. Real scientists, when asked to “review” the bogus, goofy, silly, fabricated nonsense  of statements, claims and pretentious science of NOAA, WMO, AAAS, NASA, TCCS, and other political deflections, do not even bother laughing. 

If Jordan were to critique Pete, Jordan would be a laughing stock, and so it is in the “global hoaxing community” where non-scientists, that do not exist, are written into existence by poor writers of global hoaxing fiction, and real scientists recognize absolutely nothing scientific and worthy of comment.

We must ask, to what does our silly “writer” of this “consensus letter” refer when he/she/it/“they” write, “Independent lines of evidence”? The circular argument itself is poorly constructed.

Let us start with Peer-reviewed science.

What science is peer-reviewed? The term “peer reviewed” is a dem/lib fabrication, to begin with: an attempt to garner credibility where none can possibly exist. It is two devils taping wings to each others’ backs, and both claiming the other is an angel. “Peer reviewed” is a way for bogus scientists, realistically nothing more than political agents of propaganda, to deflect from real science that dem/lib political activists are afraid will easily be refuted or proven false. “Don’t waste your time”, the dem/libs say, “looking at the water levels of the past one hundred years. We have already done that and you can trust us because we have great political (did I say that?) solutions for you to live by”. ‘Don’t look in that room, its a mess. Trust me, there is nothing to see, especially your stolen trillion dollar stimulus money, or the gold we bought with it.’ Don’t look here or there for the “lost” emails. We have already taken care of the problems, and it won’t happen again. Trust me, hillary the vampire claims.

If one were to write about results of a study, there is no credibility in the results of the study being reviewed by another of the same study. A real scientist publishes results in many sources and exposes it to review by any and all. A real scientist welcomes criticism, but not these devils of the global hoaxing “community”. They want real scientists, and exposers of dem/lib fraud, self included, silenced by political solutions.

This claim that “peer-reviewed” is some superior form of scrutiny is a fraud. It is another liberal stupidism to give themselves credibility where none is due.

Which peer reviewed Einstein’s work?

Peers don’t review others’ work.

Did Nicola Tesla review Einstein? Did Einstein review Tesla?

TO DELUDED DEM/LIBS, COOL CHARTS AND GRAPHS MAKE DEM/LIB FAIRY TALES SCIENCE AND RELIGION

To deluded dem/libs cool charts and graphs make dem/lib fairy tales science and religion

Fabrications with inflated numbers also do the trick, dem/libs think.

Love that graph of water and vapor and stuff and there, at the top of the page, a star for the Louisiana flood. Very scientific. I drew a graph. I had a star and some cool lines, and x and y projections. Do I sound dem/lib science-ish? Is that all it takes to impress loser libbies?

I made a graph and showed three circles of intersecting stuff, with the title: Global intersections against time frame compartments. Sounds cool, huh? Then I added some text below. “The consensus, according to this chart, shows temperatures are cooling globally”. Then I lied about what Pelosi said and added, “see, global trends show cooling”.

Because I want to sound science-ish, all I have to do is fool myself and my resultant, pretentious credibility should be convincing for others: after all, I am a good actor.

Acting, is everything.

Next lesson: how to pretend to be a doctor by carrying a scalpel and speaking medical language. Repeat these words: I looked at your charts and think we should try a new drug.

My fellow Americans, a scientist DOES science. A scientist does NOT sit in a room with a green wall behind him or her, and regurgitate “weather”. 

99 percent of global hoaxers are NOT in a laboratory.

They are NOT in a laboratory setting.

They are NOT doing studies.

They are NOT doing research.

They are NOT measuring anything.

They are NOT standing at the shoreline with a pen and clip board.

They are NOT at either pole taking temperatures. Nobody is at either pole except for military personnel. The poles are off-limits to civilians.

The 99 percent global hoaxers are NOT taking notes.

They are NOT doing experiments.

They are NOT looking or observing.

99 percent of global hoaxers are not even sitting in rooms with other weathermen (posing as scientists) and deriving consensus on anything.

They are NOT doing science in any way, shape or fashion.

99 percent of global hoaxers do not know they are global hoaxers.

There is no community of global scientists. They are not science-ing anything and they are not compiling notes, taking notes, or even thinking of taking notes.

They have nothing to measure or take notes for, and they do NOT even have a reason, a cause, and theory, or hypothesis to use a note to remind themselves to take notes. They do NOT have funding for anything. and so they get jobs and work at jobs.

There is no global science community. It is a fabrication that grows and shifts according to the propaganda needs of the moment. 

They are NOT sitting in committees convening or consensussing anything.

They are not going to conventions, doing online work. They are NOT trading notes because they have none. They are not thinking of trading notes they might have, if they ever did anything science-ish.

99 percent of global hoaxers are doing NOTHING even remotely related to science.

But here is the pièce de résistance: 99 percent, maybe 100 percent of global hoaxers are not, NAAAAAWT connecting observations to claims: empty or just fabricated. To describe the deep fraud of it all, “climate scientists” can be seen in many places, doing all kinds of observing but we never see one, NEVER see a single “climate scientist showing results of the effects of the observed causes. We never see “climate scientists showing connections, math, for example. We never see “climate scientists” showing the orocess that connects a mountain of observations with a black-hole of effects, claimed or referenced. There is no science where there is not scientific method. Scientific method includes, hypothesis, procedures, variables, formulae, isolation of a variable for measure, pre-test and post test, control group or control element, and collation and interpretation of data, among a few other aspects.

Observation and claim, all there is to “climate science” is grotesquely inadequate in determining if an ant farts or the moon is made of cheese. Child-id morons, all those who pretend to present science, or think they are presenting “climate” anything.

They have degrees in fields related to acting, figure skating and entertainment, but they are not doing science. They are being used. They work at jobs and it is a popularity contest: NO SCIENCE, NOT A SHRED

Welcome to dem/lib “science”.

Record high reported June 6, 2016

Record high reported June 6, 2016

Just how far will dem/libs go to propagate their lies and agenda?

Record high reported (94 degrees) June 6, 2016. All the news “people” in SLC, reported it, therefore it must be true. I saw it on the internet, right!

I went back and looked. I picked one day, June 6, 1947. Not a particularly hot day, but the reported record, in 1947, is 97 degrees. How long has that record stood? I did not bother looking.

The only way liberal “NEWS” “reporters” and the “NEWS” manufacturers behind the “NEWS” “reporters” could come up with a new record is to discard data, from 1947 and prior, and/or change something of the prior data. WOW!, that is scientific.

I hear that is just what Albert Einstein did: he changed the speed of light to accommodate his theory. Oh, and he had to change the scientific methodology of proving or disproving an hypothesis or theory.

The whole liberal boondoggle of global hoaxing, I mean warming, is fabricated to manipulate the masses.

How stupid, and/or dishonest can these liberal morons be?

And the cause-and-effect, anti-science morons totally discard data that does not conform to their presumed “science”.

Over the last 10 years daily mean temperatures have dropped. Anyone that has ever worked outdoors, as I have for 20 years in this area, knows that it is not as hot in the mornings as it used to be and does not stay hot as long in the day. That is because the “highs” are also misrepresented: LIES. The daily mean temperatures are grossly unreported because to do so would reveal global cooling.

Regularly my thermometer, that has worked just fine for 20 years since I have had it, and for 30 years with the last owner, shows highs much less than what is reported.

It takes so little effort to disprove everything la-la-land liberals claim. This is why they jump from one attack to another. They are like medieval archers “attacking” squadrons of fighter jets. They shoot their arrows into the air, run away and shoot more arrows at the same damned ghosts in the air, that cannot be reached. Then they claim they have been effective dragon-slayers. It takes nothing for YOU, dear reader, fellow American, to learn the truth of all dem/lib claims.

Search and discover for yourself, if America is a democracy or if it was designed as a Constitutional Republic. Then find out what the differences are. This takes about a minute. Then a search for a country that has a Bill of Rights, a list of rights FOR We, the People, anywhere, should take another minute because there is no country on the earth that has a Bill of Rights, FOR the individual.

Lying pig liberals hate mankind so much they will lie and deceive, and manipulate and enslave. Slavery is the purpose of deception and liberal/progressive/democrat party fraud.