RESPONSE TO CRAIGSLIST “FLAG THE FLAG” POST, 6/12/21

Re: “Flag the Flag”

What a crock of shit.

The flag represents the people of a nation. A flag does not represent inanimate objects in a territory or region. America is tradition, like all nations have traditions. American traditions are freedom, self-governance, opportunity for all. Equity and equality are two very different things, and those who tell you that equity is the better angel of the two, is lying, to YOU!

Do you want equality to pursue and live without prejudice before the blind law? Do you understand this extremely significant principle? Why have you not investigated equality before the law? Do you think, somehow, magically, that IN-equality before the law, such as one finds in commie China, oppressive marxist countries and all democracies, is a better system to afford you rights? Show me, show us all a list of individual rights that commie China guarantees for the people? Nothing?

Have you looked at equity in commie China? Equity is the same, imposed, forced, and controlled outcome. Equity is not equality before the law nor is it equal opportunity. All Chinese citizens are tagged, watched, and forced to a very low imposed, state-controlled life barely above poverty. Equity kills!

Is that what you want?

The flag is a representation. Anyone who sees an offensive flag is an idiot, a liar trying to manipulate YOU to risk your life and freedoms for their gains.

To say that our flag represents all those negative things that the bolshevik political agent claims, is to admit bolshevik-dick is either totally ignorant of truths from reality of what a flag represents, to principles of nationhood to actual reality of what the America flag represents.

What does the flag show? We see stripes of red on a white background. Red represents the blood of those who fought. Be clear, others with high hopes for progeny and a future country free of oppression from a ravaging kingdom across an ocean, fought and gave their lives for others, YOU. How many stripes?

The stars represent the individual states. YES, states have recognition in a National flag because states have sovereignty in many areas. States were established to be a buffer against centralized tyranny. Do you know what tyranny is? Do you realize that tyranny is evil, forceful, equitable and not equality before the law? Do you realize that tyranny is murderous and without control? The founding fathers balanced centralized government, totalitarian tyranny on the left end of the spectrum against no government, anarchy and no collective security on the right. Can you understand that?

Did you know that the original scale was not left democrat and right republican? No, where have you been and to whom have you been listening?

Did bolshevik-dick inform you that republican principles are NOT, NAAAAAAAAWT right wing, but the balanced middle? Why would the left-wing extremists portray the balanced middle as anything other than a balance between oppression and insecurity of individuality? Why would left wing extremists portray republican guarantees of individual rights as anything other than individual rights to resist centralized control? Why would left wing extremists portray republican balance as anything other than adherence to traditions of freedom and states’ rights to resist centralized control over individuals? Hmmmm. What lies follow what lies told by those who desire to exploit YOU?

The basic fundamental principle of OUR flag, OUR representation of OUR faith in others who value individual rights and opportunity, is antithetic to centralized, dementocratic, bolshevik oppression and slaughter of opposition. Tyranny kills detractors. Have you not seen that in history, or are you history “challenged? History challenged means you are reality challenged, forced by classical conditioning, to live in a dystopian trap.

That bolshevik bastard that claims the flag is offensive, is purely lying. A thing cannot be offensive. A thing, even as a simple representation of something else, is not offensive, especially when the symbolism is so well defined, and proven over two centuries.

A dollar bill, for example, is a representation of a credit owed to the bank. Are you offended by a piece of paper, or piece of cloth?

What on that piece of paper offends, and what on that cloth offends? Are you offended by the blood shed by others, in sacrifice, that gave spineless, lying bolshevik-dick the right to complain? What is offensive, 50 stars that represent state resistance to centralized totalitarian tyranny? How on earth could anyone be offended by the flying proof that dicks of all spineless degrees have rights?

It is all a lie, to manipulate YOU, to do something stupid, so the bolsheviks can take totalitarian control, of YOU!

DEM/LIB ANTI-SCIENCE TRUTH

Originally published on earnwrite.com, author Brent, 2/11/14

Let us address this idea of republicans being anti-science, as dem/lib liars continually propagate. Do we understand what propagate means? Propagate means to continually express, “information, ideas, or rumors deliberately spread widely to help or harm a person, movement, group, institution, nation, etc.”

We know propaganda with a negative context, to spread misinformation and lies.

When I write of the tyranny-wing, left, lying liberals, I mean they propagate lies. Daily I write with conscience, working to dispel myths and outright fabrications by democrats and liberals regarding many topics. Their favorites are that republicans and republic-minded citizens (including tea party representatives) are anti-science,  conspiracy theorists, anti-government and pro-religion (to an extreme they call the religious right).

Specifically, however, this article refers to the liberal lies about science.

Is political science a science? Is physiology, math, physics, chemistry,  sociology, psychology science? “Ology” is the “study of…”.

Of the approximate 40 million democrat voters (again less than half) how many are Mexicans that don’t read, write, or speak English? How smart are they, being the dregs of Mexico that couldn’t find work, or wouldn’t, and have sub-standard education? Are these the educated masses in the democrat electorate?

By removing 20 to 30 million Mexicans from the ranks of “educated” democrats, the democrats become a smaller minority. If we keep the Mexicans in the count then the democrat easily becomes the dumber group. If we use a scientific education as a mark of the depth of science in one party or the other, the dem/libs lose, hands down. If the republicans are richer (not true), and knowing that affluence sends people to college, then amongst the whites there are more rich republicans in colleges, studying and learning science.

Education produces more science oriented people, especially those that go to the universities.

How many Congressmen and women have degrees in political science? Are they all democrats?

Looking at a cross section of America, anywhere, in any city, those on the “wrong side of the tracks”, in the poor parts of town, are always less educated. From these people, democrats themselves, claim they draw the masses’ support. What percentage of people from the wrong side of the tracks have a scientific background at a college level? To study a science and work in that field one must be scientific. To accept the realities of modern education one must accept the scientific method of proving or dispelling a hypothesis. Theory about anything is just imagination never applied, but science, the application of proven theory, is evidence of pro-science. How many college graduates, of people that live scientific methodology, are democrats and how many are republicans?

The most significant variable in science is, again, not what liars and propaganda specialists in the dem/lib ranks call science, but what it actually is. To know the scientific methodology is to BE scientific. Democrats, typically less educated, do have troubles with science. Ask 100 democrat supporters (including the corresponding non-conversant Mexican), what scientific methodology is. How many will know? Ask 100 republican supporters and tell us how many know.

The basics to science is action/reaction, stimulus/response, deductive reason and cause and effect. These are all cores to science methodology, the foundation of science. How many democrat supporters are lost in translation? How many democrat supporters are lost because they abandoned their own country because they were too ignorant to find work? This drops the democrat supporter scientific base to well below that of republican base. I have not done any studies, and only heard of one recently that debunks the myth of democrats being more scientific and having higher eduction. All one has to do is travel the buses and trains and listen to people complain about things the government needs to do for them. Not many that have studied political science would not know characteristics of tyranny, communism, marxism/fascism and other political ideologies, that less educated bus travelers could never understand. Not many outside of any science could not see the cause and effect of spending beyond budgets. And this is the dem/lib base.

Science is the study of relationships and measure of change. Consider geometry. How many Mexicans, or whites, or christian dem/libs know what a hypotenuse is? It is no stretch of the imagination that the poorer education system in Mexico produces poorer students. And these people are part of the overall intelligence, or lack thereof, in the dem/lib, sub-intellect, propaganda community. Sure there are professors that are dem/libs. There are also republican professors. I am one.

One argument the dem/libs front is that religion is anti science because it believes the world was created in six days as opposed to obvious evidence of “evolution”. The word evolution isn’t even used anymore as a term to describe adaptation of species. There are a lot more christian democrats than republican christians. Less educated = less scientific = more subject to mythology and non-science. Ignorance = faith. There are more faithful dem/libs than republicans. To have faith, that is blind faith or ignorance in government, is no different than having faith in a religious politician. There is not a single republican christian I know, that believes the world was created in six real days. To most republican, if not all, christians, six days of creation, is a metaphor. I would estimate that 50 % of democrats do not know what a metaphor is.

Not many even believe it was created. But to the ignorant that know nothing of evolution, survival of the fittest, adaptation, etc., faith in anything is easier than telling your children you are an ignorant dimwit. The dem/lib mantra that ‘the guv’mint will take care of us’ is no different a faith in false deity than the judeo-christian faith in much more prominent beings that have survived through millennia.

The republican anti-science myth is easily propagated amongst the less educated, more susceptible to manipulation, lower middle class Americans, that fill the dem/lib electorate, in the ever dwindling minority.