PART 6. DERANGED ELIZABETH GRANT, SATAN SALAZAR, AND THE SLC BOARD OF DE-EDUCATION.

HAPPENING EVERYWHERE.

Wow, so much information and so many ways to communicate.

READ!

Equity, Critical Race Theory, all the new age crap this school board teaches is de-educating your children.

Equity is racism, and goofy lizzy admits she is a proponent. Equity is big and destructive to the soul.

There is quite a process getting poison into your children’s food and you should know how it is done to avoid it. Will your read and learn?

Equity is bigger, worse, and poisoning your children. It poisons your children’s minds to accept authoritarian lies about poison in food, among other things. You are already at this point. Soy, sugar, mercury, sulfur, fluoride are all toxic.

Like learning how poisons are in your children’s foods you need to learn how equity is poison.

Equity goes all the way back to the beginnings of antifa in the “Russian Revolution”.

Yes, Russian Revolution is in quotes because it was not a revolution as we know. It was a takeover by a minority that slaughtered centuries old enemies of khazaria, Russians. But, read my other articles for more.

Get off your asses and start reading.

The material for this attack on lizzy and the demented board of de-education just flows. Everything I write flows easily, not always perfectly coherent without editing, but I believe I get my points presented in a readable and understandable manner. I say this because I discovered much more to relate than I anticipated when I discovered the SLC board of de-education rot.

When I get scores of threats that include claims my commentaries are incoherent and that I ramble (I do…so what?), or that I make no sense at all, then I know I am hitting nerves.

Anyway, blah blah, blah.

If liar loser lizzy is a good translator of research why does she not translate good? Does she translate good information or bad? It seems neither liar lizzy nor satan salazar care. Neither made mention of any research dizzy translated: either good or bad information.

Oh, yes, I am going to thrash her and salazar, bizarro forever. Posters are next.

Get your children out of the clutches of these vampires, liars, agents of teaching destructive theory.

Just a thought: Maslow’s theory of hierarchical needs: taught every day as reality?

Theory of relativity, taught every day as reality?

Theory of ego, id and alter-ego, taught every day as reality?

Critical race theory: THEORY, taught every minute if every day?

Math is reality, biology, physics, reading are all hard sciences and reality. CRT is theory. Why is it given so much more time than realities?

CRT is the ultimate bolshevik flip-flop of reality for fantasy, submission for freedom, guilt for innocence, and vice versa.

We have no idea if she translates good research into good policies or research of bad information into bad policies, or good research into bad policies, or vice versa. Do you see the distraction and deflection?

What research? Whose research? Obviously nothing worth mention.

I, myself, have in a good way, turned research into policy. I found a site that explained how to pick locks and break into homes.

If I were applying for a job in home security would you want to know what I have studied, learned and applied.

What is lizzy applying?

All we know of dizzy is equity. No mention of physics, reading, study, or anything tangible. The only real identifying value or principle, or dogma or indoctrination we have given to us is the big destruction of “equity”.

Equity is evil, it is suppression, oppression, stifling, manipulation, coercion, silencing, berating, bashing, bullying and totally destructive to your child’s soul.

Are you insane?

What research does loser lizzy turn into policy? Did she find it on the internet? Was it a goofle search (yes, goofle- I hate those guys, won’t communicate the name).

Did lizzy find detrimental research and do a good job turning it into destruction? Equity is destruction, part of CRT, part of tyrannical misinformation and manipulation.

Do you not want to know what she has learned and how she will apply it to force of ruler/teacher law upon your children?

If they are lying by deflecting and distracting, they are lying to damage you and yours.

Knock knock!

Yes?

Hi, I am your neighborhood vampire and I am a board of education policy advisor, and I have an impressive work history.

Oh, very good, come in.

Bad move, even if only a fairy tale anecdote.

You do realize that vampires cannot enter a home until invited? Then you are dinner.

You do realize that it is you who has invited de-education, change-agents, mental/emotional vampires, into your children’s minds?

The results of institutionalized programming are horrific, but you could not possibly know because the meaning of learning has been blurred.

It is like comparing smart dogs to smarter dogs. Do any talk, count?

Your children have already lost and the parameters are yours, forced upon you for your whole life.

Your first clue is your anxiety for, or fear or hatred of the words and terms I use in these commentaries.You can check this so easily yourself. Compare equity and equality before the law, for example.

Consider I.Q. tests, Intelligence Quotients. Who says?

Why are your children graded for intelligence by ninnies of low intelligence, and then your children are told what role in a constrained society they should play?

Wait, some are told they should be doctors, agents of pharmakaia (sorcery), so that’s good, right. How many are pegged thusly?

All five of my parents’ children were told they should be doctors or teachers. WOW! My parents did not fall for that garbage.

Who established the quotients, you?

PART 4. SECRET AGENT ELIZABETH GRANT.

WHO IS ELIZABETH GRANT? SECRET CRT AGENT ADMINISTRATOR OF CHILD ABUSE?

Change agents in the schools, not teachers. They refer to themselves as change agents: change agents above education.

Is she a CRT agent, a secret agent? Never thought of it that way, correct?

If she is a change agent of CRT, unknown unannounced, she is a secret agent.

Did Salt Lake City parents vote for this, want this, or do they even know the horrendous deception and assault is on?

Is bolshevik/banker slut-administrator elizabeth grant a promoter of transgender mutilation?

Is she a promoter of gender and life-dystopia story time?

Is that slut a promoter of hiding information from parents?

Did that commie rat salazar reveal any of this to the public?

What are they hiding?

Being a something does not mean you ‘be’ that something well.

In fact, hiding it is evidence of being poor or bad at that something.

She is a bad educator, for your children. She is a bad administrator.

She is a bad leader of bad shaping of your children.

I presume all this based on the lies of salazar and the bolshevik/banker media creating yet another hero out of a change agent manipulating, conditioning and mutilating your children, mentally and physically.

But it gets worse.

It is hidden. It is a secret. obviously, what her goals and plans are. They lie. Their agenda, slash and burn, chemical warfare and surgical mutilation, is the secret assault on our children. Yours, I do not send mine anywhere near ravagers of humanity.

Are you sure you want your child taught to be racist? Of course it is the bolshevik flip-flop of reality for fantasy, truth for lies, good for evil, guilt for innocence, and vice versa, while the promoters of it have learned to not admit it or identify the parts of CRT as CRT. They have broken it down and call it different things, to deceive you, or they call it nothing except “work experience”, Senior Policy Advisor”.

In the chicken coop group-think, racism against whites is promoted and group imposed.

In fact CRT racism is different from the reality of racism. Racism is not a crime, barely offensive, really, but racism in the classroom is an attack on all the children of all groups.

You had better find out just what good is being taught to your children.

CRT teaches whites to hate themselves, and subject themselves to unfair treatment. Do you want that for your children?

Are you sure you want your children submitting to coercion? Do you want your child forced to submit to self-destruction, mutilation and mind numbing theories?

Why are theories taught as reality?

Salazar and grant are bringing all this hatred, and violent follow-up, into the group think classroom.

The imposing of equity over equality is a primary element of CRT.

Equity, stealing from productive people, should shock your soul.

Equity is racism. Equity is imposed inferiority on all groups, through an attack on one group. All is accomplished in the herd, class.

Oh, you say, but we need to teach our children to not be racist.

Why do you send your children to school, again? Remind me, please.

100 hours or social engineering? Who decides what to build, you or a secret agent?

If they have to lie to you by deflecting and distracting, and using sophist terms, titles and words, they are not your friends; they are not facilitators of learning, and they are enemies of you, and your children.

What do administrators do except sit around on their asses, talk and impose?

But it gets worse.

“Her impressive work history….”, means nothing. Her work history is for bad or good, or does bad or good, or imposes bad or good?

So much talking but telling us nothing about her agenda, her actual work, her ethics or guiding principles.

Do you not see the gross deception in institutionalized education, and the flaunting of distraction and deflection by secret agents?

Salazar and lizzy are both secret agents. Do you want a secret agent administering and teaching? They are secret agents of CRT, racism, hate, division, herding and corralling, and equity: mutilation and destruction.

Do you not see the grotesque deception of the Salt Lake City Board of Education written in this fairy tale of lies?

Impressive work history? Good work or bad work?

Good, as in facilitating learning of equality before the law, or equity of group think, group dynamics, group coercion and hence, destruction?

PART 3. WHO IS ELIZABETH GRANT? PLANNED CHAOS AND DIVISION IN CLASSROOMS.

What do educators do with our children for 12 years less 100 hours to learn to read?

If a child can read a child can learn math, physics, history, everything.

Group think, drone-ism and many other “isms” are taught through group think submersion. Our Children are being classically conditioned to many sub-intelligent, sub-human, self-destructive behaviors.

Everybody is missing the forest for the trees. Everything is group pressure from the top, and created from the top within the group. Favoring one part of the group, the class, by disfavoring another, whites, in particular, is not only divisive, it is chaotic, as planned within the classroom: the group.

In my opinion real learning is not seen.

Two things of unseen, real learning: group, confined, isolated from real world experiences, group-think oppression, is the big teaching success, not reading, not math, not science.

Second: the few minutes at home with instruction by parents, a child directed to learn, is real learning, also not seen.

We are conditioned to see what is not real and vice versa.

In spite of hours of group think instruction in the classroom, children do NOT learn reading, math, science, language. Learning is done by the learner, and more at home out of the group think room.

You do not see it, because your attention is directed at the group-think facility.

You are the major facilitator of the only one who learns, the learner, while the change agent manipulates your child’s mind, principles into dogma and voluntary exploitation.

You are the more successful teacher of the one who learns, the learner, your child.

But, I am telling you group-think is bigger and more detrimental to the individual, your child, than you think.

Communism is not voluntary participation in community. Communism is forced grouping and submission. Schooling in the classroom is submersion in group submission.

Teachers are not teachers. They are placers. They place information before children, in a group-think submission confinement and children learn by participation, submission, and group.

I cannot learn you. Again, teachers are placers. They primarily place group-think submission while learners learn best at home and out of the classroom.

Learning at home is learning. Again the best teacher does not teach. Learning is internal, not external.

The main topic, the main subject, the main and primary focus in institutionalized programming systems is GROUP. It is not noticed because the small parts are the focus of the media. It is taught without question every second of every day a child is subjected to classroom group-think chaos. It is mind-numbing by design, and agents of this assault on children are teachers and administrators.

Group is imposed. “Group” is the lesson being taught. Group control from authority is socialist tyranny, is what children are being programmed to live. They are not taught, they are programmed.

You see, I can use different words to describe what happens to our children. Who is to say I am not correct or more accurate than what you think?

You cannot successfully express your opinion in opposition to mine until you have read and studied. What will you tell me that I have not heard? My opinions developed because I feasted on information from all sides and reject what you have accepted. Let us compare,

I do not care if you are fair to me. You have nothing to convince me of anything anyway. I write this for you. I know your opinions are emotionally motivated, and ignorant because I know you respond immediately to my new information and discussion; my newly formed opinions and interpretations, and you have not had time to investigate. So, your opinions, if you have not done the hundreds, thousands of hours of study as I have done, are nothing to me. Hence, your unfair treatment of my ideas and principles, is nothing to me either. But you should worry for you and yours.

Until you step out of that level of ignorance and learn a few words and analyze both sides of this, your opinion counts for nothing, for you.

Now don’t think I am boasting, or egoist. I am simply stating I have done a lot of research into this over the years and can see through the lies and fake superiority, and I invite you to free yourself, as I did, from the deception of distraction, sophistry, deflection, and self-adoration of fake superiors.

I am making this an issue. I have made this an issue for decades.

Salazar begins to reveal the agenda very quickly in his fairy tale when he states, “She was instrumental in shaping public education policy while serving as a chief of staff and senior policy advisor within the Office of Elementary and Secondary Education at the U.S. Department of Education…”.

Shaping? Shaping can be a number of different things. Taking a blob of clay and forming it into a bowl is shaping. Taking a sledge hammer and bashing the bowl to a mound of rubble is also shaping.

Chaotic division in a classroom group is also shaping.

Salazar said nothing about what she shaped and how, so how do we know she is a good shaper or a shaper of good?

If they deflect, they hide.

When people write or speak in headline statements but give no details, you must wonder about the person’s honesty and the veracity of the claims.

For actual safety reasons you must question this appointee and who actually did it.

I am certain salazar is lying when he claims a stakeholder committee of 40 people “evaluated” her.

How many others were evaluated? Who was on the committee? Tell us their names. Who?

When salazar writes that “…she shapes…”, it means absolutely nothing except that salazar is hiding something from YOU.

I would not trust this grant woman as far as I could kick her lying luciferian ass, or salazar’s.

You might think I am jumping to conclusions, but no. I read the article.

From your perspective, if you have not read the article, you have no place except ignorance in believing I am wrong.

So, it is on you to read and educate yourself. Look for the details. None? Who was on the stakeholder committee, fellow vampires, facilitators of child abuse, parents with children in school?

For all we know the committee was a committee of only dementocrats who believe in big brother government controlling everything in your life, to take everything in your life. Maybe the committee was made up of only biased haters of whites. Who was on the so-called committee? Why the deception?

What is a stakeholder committee? Who did the stakeholders appoint to the committee?

Read the different adjectives and adverbs I use to describe the same things they promulgate, and read my comments of salazar’s and grant’s words, and then go read their words for yourself. You will be reading from my perspective which I claim is, and should be, yours. Then discern for yourself if my interpretation is correct.

If you read the short report with conditioned acceptance, as most people do, you will find it a nice story about her success, with no proof that her so-alled success will benefit your children.

But read the article and ask what and why of everything.

She worked in the department of Education? WOW! And you accept that working for government has inherent credibility? You accept that without thinking or wondering?

That is very bad, for you and yours.

Salazar would have you believe that just being in a place is good. She worked? And that’s it, that’s all?

What work did she do?

It is centralized, de-education that is leaving our children dumb.

Not telling us what makes lizzy grant a good shaper or educator, or programming administrator, or corralling facility manager, makes salazar a liar.

Why is he lying?

Do you like being deceived?

Do your friends and loved ones lie to you?

Of those who lie to you constantly how many of them do you consider to be friend or ally?

Do you not see how grossly deceptive this is, and wonder why?

What the hell about this bolshevik/banker whore, grant are they keeping from you, and why? What plans, programming, institutionalized grouping do they have planned for your children?

Again, why was this bolshevik/banker whore grant hired?

But it gets worse.

What did she do at the U.S. Department of Education? Did she shape, and how. How she shaped, is the issue!

How she shaped and molded and instilled chaos is the issue, not that she worked. What a disgusting fraud laid before you and expected to be accepted without question. Are you really that stupid?

Did she manage? What and how she managed is the issue!

Did she administer, systematize?

She was, however, a “Senior Policy Advisor”. WOW! That clarifies everything.

Is she a senior? Was her policy advising for seniors? How does one become a senior advisor? Somebody sets money aside to pay for such a hypocrisy, for expressing words that deflect and distract. Is that it?

Do you see how liars and fabricators, those who deflect and distract you from truth and reality; do you see how they use title, names, cool words to give themselves adoration and fake credibility?

Again, if she is a good policy advisor, why is she not advising good? And, again, no mention either way.

We do not know if she was a bad policy advisor, but we also don’t know she was good, or an advisor of good policy. Who decides what is bad and what is good, people who don’t care about your children like you do? Who decides what is bad and good for your children, people who care more for titles, capital letters, and money, or you?

PART 2. WHO IS DR. ELIZABETH GRANT? EXPERT AT WHAT?

What happens in the classroom? Do you know?

My premise for this is that children do not learn to read at school, and most in the education programming incarceration units do not learn to read at all.

What the hell do teachers, educators, programmers, holding compounds and systems managers do for 12 years?

Education is the institutionalized word of knowledge, but knowledge is not inherent with education. Why must our children be institutionalized to learn, especially when they learn what you think they do not learn?

The programs, systems, and corrals do not teach knowledge like you think they do. Group think is institutional and institutionally forced upon weak minds. Teachers teach nothing until the point at which a child learns. But, group think, in group setting does impose conditions that stay with children: group, and pressure to conform.

If not to facilitate learning what does the bolshevik/banker education system do?

I did some research on “educator” grant. There is not much information about her to be found. Why her? What qualifications made her the best for this job?

President salazar stated she stood out from the others. Why?

The bongino theorem is in effect: If he’s a good batter why doesn’t he bat good?

If she is a good educator, or facilitator of learning, why doesn’t she educate good?

Is she a good educator or an educator of good?

The whole article is about her being a good educator, not an educator of good. It is gross deception.

But wait, you say, nobody said she was a bad educator. True, but that does not make her an educator of good or a good educator.

You will not find much, if anything regarding her abilities to teach, educate, administer, or super intend.

These things, obviously, do not matter to school boards.

If you read the article you will see there is nothing about her that says she is good.

You will read there is a lot of fluff, narcissism, and self-serving, but not service.

Institutionalized education has talking points built from nothing except words tossed together, to sound important.

If she is the best for the job, why? Capital letters grouped together and job titles say nothing.

I am a PhD in GECR: Geodetic Early….does it matter? Big letters, next to a PhD should give me instant credibility and presumed superior knowledge, correct? And I administer it like any administrator administrates: still saying nothing about my abilities and success, like grant’s. She is a something, good or bad, good or bad administrator, not important to the board or salazar, or herself. Losers, liars.

So listen to me, I am the expert, and great, in case you forgot, because I say so, and so does my title. Unlucky for me, I do not have another dude with a title and professional deception, edifying me, like grant and salazar kissing each others’ asses.

Salazar said nothing about grant except the fairy tale story that she is an educator with experience. How do we know she educates good?

We do not know.

Let me restate that, we do not know either way until we read and dissect the words of the article.

Let me get you started.

WHO IS DR. ELIZABETH GRANT, HIRED BY THE SALT LAKE CITY BOARD OF EDUCATION. WHY?

Why was she hired?

I have questions but before I begin this commentary, I must apologize, again. I thought I would write a short and simple commentary about this “woman”, Elizabeth Grant but after doing almost no serious research, and dissecting the Salt Lake City Board of Education’s description of her, and the appointment, written by the President, nate salazar. After looking at her history, as brief and scant as it is, I discovered she is worse and more evil than I thought.

This is evil coming home to you.

You had better look at this and her, and The President of the SLC Board of Education, very seriously.

You can dismiss this as whatever you want or investigate, even if just to prove to yourself I am making a mountain out of a molehill. Can you be sure of anything in ignorance?

These evil people are bringing death and destruction to us.

Please read, and do your own research. Expand your mind to the realities of life around you, and adapt. If adapting requires you to change a fantasy for a reality, abortion being infanticide, for example, you had better do it for your own sake.

Why are they killing, and promoting the killing, of your children?

Are you killing their children, or are they killing yours?

I also apologize for whipping this article off without serious editing. I don’t have time.

The whole education system is a bolshevik/banker construct.

It takes a child 100 hours to learn to read competently, and then the world is at that child’s feet. What then? What else?

Let us break this down even further. What is a teacher?

What is an educator? What is learning?

We are conditioned to think children, people in general cannot learn without being taught. We are conditioned to believe we need educators, administrators, classrooms, groups, school yards, school sports and more.

We are continually told we need help, direction, leadership, and teaching.

Do we?

Are we dumb animals? Maybe you are, and if you do not start reading, learning and adapting you will remain a dumb animal, getting dumber, and more easily controlled, to your own demise.

We need good educators, right? We need the best. We need optimal environment for learning, correct?

Let us get the best teacher and place a bag of hammers before him or her.

Teach!

Go ahead, teach the hammers to write. Go ahead, teach cats and dogs to write. Teach, do your job and teach.

Teach cats and dogs to do addition. Come now, math teacher, teach.

The variable is not the teacher. The primary variable in learning is the learner. The second most important variable, when we look at this from the correct perspective, the child’s perspective, is love, from the parent, not the surrogate, representative of unloving authority: the group-think facilitator.

Teaching is nothing.

Learning is everything. And if it takes 100 hours to learn to read, what do teachers teach?

Remember, they “teach” in a forced, peer pressurized, conditioned environment: chickens in a chicken run, afraid of the same things because the educators have submerged the captives. Children learn group-think fear of authority.

Educating is nothing. Education is nothing. Learning and knowledge are very different things from programming, teaching, and educating.

It is difficult, I am sure, for most people to see children in a school corral as something negative.

Individuals are everything, and public education suppresses it. By design, few rise above to join the elitists’ classes.