BRAVE FIONA LASHELLS, COWARDLY PARENTS, MAYOR SCHUBERT AND ABDICATION OF DUTY TO CHILDREN

Fiona Lashells suspended for lecturing science-retarded, criminal school board.

I do not know how to describe this except that just look at the dripping stupidity of the members of that school board who sit in their ivory towers, at their table of superiority and are so sub-human, so gone from honesty and integrity, they must be lectured and scolded by a child.

They cut off her microphone.

Imagine a bully, sitting at a desk, a student standing before him or her, and the bully, a big tough person, scolding and beating up a child without the parent knowing. Imagine the sickest, sub-human scum, pigs, bullies, liars, thieves, cowards pretending to be tough by berating a child. A student is a captive audience for the esteem-lacking teacher.

You must look at teachers, most of them, for what they are. They lack esteem so they picture themselves revered by children, not adults or peers, children of a captive, vulnerable, naive and morally and ethically susceptible gulag.

And the mentally-deranged hate-stream media defends these mental and moral midgets.

Think about how tough one would have to be to take that unimpeachable power over a child, and use it to berate and beat that child into submission.

What would it take to pound the hell out of a cowardly teacher or school board member who does this, to children? What ravaging, blood-sucking, monsters are they?

How about the names, and we identify them as bullies?

Who are these pigs?

Give us the names. 

Do you remember in high school how some students, fellow students seemed ok, popular, normal? Who are they now? Who are the monsters violating and exploiting these children, the majority of children in public de-education camps? What kind of people were these goons in high school? Can we see patterns? That would be scientific, and a step to protecting other children.

Were the goons molesting our children today popular, geeks, nerds, athletes or what? Look at Erin Mndehall in Salt Lake City. So “pretty” and popular in high school, and such a dictatorial slut today, violating people of Salt Lake City. She actually went looking for a way to undermine OUR representative process as our State Legislature made laws protecting the freedoms of We, the People, and our children.

Where did that slut find information and who gave her confirmation she would not be taken into the streets and beaten for violating OUR law? What money and power is behind that bitch that gave her the dystopian courage to place Salt Lake people under her thumb?

Somebody identify these school board members that violate, basically rape and humiliate a child. Are these school board members someone you thought was normal in high school? It is not human, what these scum are doing to your children, but you put and left your children in their clutches.

Why do the parents of Fiona use their child to fight this battle they should easily win by taking the child out of school?

What kind of moronic parent puts a child in harm’s way?

Parents who feed their children to the bolshevik grinder are cowards.

The teacher and principle that violates my child, whether they do it with sexual tampering by pornography, by any sick twisted name, gets a beating. But I do not send my children to vampires for blood-testing.

We are missing many principles in this defiling of our children. If you send you child to a school that is even slightly suspicious, you are a coward and an accomplice.

‘Here, Mr. vampire, take my child and I trust you to not sneak a drink of blood form my brave, little sacrifice.’ Do you send your children to baseball practice and wonder if they will be learning pornography? The only difference is you are classically conditioned to sacrifice your children top organized, authoritarian abuse of your children.

I would love to catch a teacher doing anything like the majority of teachers are doing today. No more talking without a tongue for that pig.

Do you not realize that most teachers are bought under the table, and working on the sly to tun your children into state-slaves? Are you so dumb, or cowardly?

When Fiona delivered her talk and those monsters of de-education sat and ignored that little child, those parents should have rushed that stage, ripped the clothing from those bolshevik bastard board members, beaten them for violating their children, and then call the real police, not the cowards that do bolshevik tactics arresting innocent people. Then those “perents” should have grabbed their children, taken them out of that school forever, and stopped paying taxes for public de-education and violation.

Am I advocating violence? YES! What violence has been perpetrated against your child? You put your child in the clutches of vampires, surely paid upon the sly to violate your children, and YOU!

Who is investigating the money trail?

What gives school board members the incentive, bravado and assurance of impunity to openly and knowingly violate your children?

Are you insane?

Again, dear school board vulture: ‘Here is my vulnerable, voiceless, innocent child. Please take my baby into your care and be sure you do not teach the child adult themes and politics. Please educate my child with mathematics, reading, and do not, ever, treat my child as chattel or a blood sacrifice for your financial gain. I am entrusting you, Mr. Dracula, to not treat my child as a meal.’

How does one do that knowing the school boards will violate your children when your backs are turned, or you think the vampires have been changed, transformed, made into humans?

How do you parents deceive yourselves so grotesquely and grossly?

Look at those “people” sitting on that stage as Fiona delivers a message she wrote herself, delivering a simple message of one real scientific variable. Look at those demented goons, elevating themselves above parents. Look at those sick, depraved, lying bullies, stealing your money and beating children into illegal submission. They broke the law.

Where are the judges issuing bench warrants? If they won’t then you, parents, people, get off your lazy, submissive, cowardly surrendering asses and fight for your children.

Look at that child, scolding correcting, teaching the so-called educators regarding freedom, the fundamental of OUR civilization.

What are their names? Let us identify the child-molesters and bullies. You identify them, put their pictures up, slander them, tell the truth about the bullies and child-molesters. Report them. If the police do nothing then you do a “private prosecution”.

Where are the judges today? Are they not judging? Did they forget their place, and service to We, the People.

A mayor, Craig Schubert, delivered a choice for teachers distributing pornography.

Who is paying these teachers behind the scenes to violate your children?

Schubert stated he had spoken with a judge and the judge confirmed it is pornography teachers were disseminating amongst young students, CHILDREN!

What the hell is wrong with these people?

These teachers, “people” broke the law and violated you children. A mayor delivers a public message, calling on the teachers to resign or face prosecution. Unless they are prosecuted they will violate again.

These “teachers” should be prosecuted, stripped, beaten and dragged trough the streets for bullying and violating children, But what are the parents doing, cheering for injustice to go unchecked, and thinking they have won some landmark victory.

Beat those teachers. They violated your children! Are you a coward? Parents, you whose children were violated, are you so dumb you will not make your children know you are their protector? PROSECUTE, PROSECUTE, PROSECUTE!

LET THE WORLD KNOW THERE ARE PARENTS WHO ARE ACTUALLY PARENTS OF THEIR CHILDREN!

Who are the teachers? What are their names? Why are they not written up in the “NEWS” as child-molesters, criminals involved in sexual tampering with a child?

Where is that dud, megyn kelly, salotte plastique, referring to these school board members and teachers as presumed sexual predators? I am slightly amazed at how the white witch kelly, has confused and hypnotized some of the balanced center media. She was interviewed and complimented by pharmakaia (sorcery) advocate Ben Shapiro, as if she had some degree of integrity. A white witch is still a witch, but one who looks good and clean. Kelly is filthy through and through.

These “teachers” and administrators got away with crime, because parents did not finish the fight, ending the ability of the enemies to continue to wage war. Who is the judge? Who are the parents? This is evil and the parents are cheering, until the next teacher collusion violates their children, and it will happen because the message was sent: crime in America, the most heinous of crimes violating innocent, vulnerable children, is no longer crime!

ASHLI BABBIT’S SO-CALLED KILLER WAS EXONERATED. HOW?

Ashli Babbit’s killer was exonerated? How?

What processes were invoked? Nothing but secret pretenses and suddenly, wham, he or she is exonerated? Again, how could this be without trials etc.? It was reported it was an internal investigation. Is that like the foxes in the henhouse exonerating themselves for eating the chickens?

Where is the public spectacle and crucifixion the dementocrats perform every time a cop is involved in a shooting? Where was the moronic attacks by the demented liberal media?

This was a hit! This was a set up to kill someone.

I cannot reveal my sources, sorry.

I cannot say if the hit was on a particular woman or an order to take out a white woman, the opposite of a black man. But wait! Is it really a hit when she showed no signs of being shot, as the media and narratives claim?

There was no blood. This hit was a set-up, what some call a false flag.

So, upon whom, then, was the false flag “hit” executed?

A bloody nose produces more blood than we see in the videos. Again, there is no blood. There is no pool of blood, no blood on clothing, nobody reaching to cover the wound. There is no blood on anyone helping her.

The perfect position for a video is a huge exposé.

Then the police show up, immediately after the gun shot, and their response is not what you would see when someone is firing in their direction. Then they disappear, go back down the stairs from where they entered the scene, without arresting anyone, or dragging anyone away. This is all very uncharacteristic of the police. Were they real police?

One man, in a mask, attends to Ashli, waves others away, and he has no blood on him, no blood on his hands and made no attempt to cover a bleeding wound because there was none. The man’s actions appear to be one of a doctor shooing people away to give the fainting person air. Again, she needed room to breathe, nobody, not a soul, tried to cover a wound in her neck or anywhere, and not only was there no blood spurting from major arteries in the throat and neck area, there was not a drop of blood anywhere.

In a real shooting, in seconds only, with a gun shot wound, there is blood everywhere.

The shooter was wearing a mask so we do not know who it was. How did the dementocrats find him, or her? How could point blank firing, more force than necessary, be exonerated? Of course there was no trial, no public slaughter by the dementocrats and bolshevik/lib media.

No blood! No interviews and no blaming by the media, except for attacks on President-elect Trump; no BLM attacking the police, and those thugs breaking glass and property all looked like Antifa and BLM cubs.

They are stupid children manipulated by “trained” bolshevik marxists. Trained at what? Trained to manipulate and create chaos and control. The founders admitted they were trained marxists. Agsin, trained at what, being marxist or doing something?

And the media, the sick demented, twisted, backward, sub-intelligent goons of the media are in on it.

Don Lemon, accosta, salotte plastique megyn kelly, The whore who openly referred to candidate Trump with the most egregious lie, and then her career blossomed. She is a whore of the globalist bolsheviks.

I could name them all, Mad cow rachel, boy she is ugly, almost as ugly as salotte plastique. A different ugly though.

Does it matter that these people are stupid and ugly? Yes.

Zuckerberg is also plastic. He looks like Sunny in I Robot. He is a fascist: government and industry working together under a pretense that industry has freedoms to operate and acquire wealth. The leaders are paid well, allowed to acquire wealth, but the masses of workers are controlled through the CEOs by government.

Are companies such as Google, eff bee and other silicon valley companies not hiring cheap labor from India? Yes, In 2016 the immigration rules for Indians changed allowing another 100,000 skilled workers into America, displacing jobs for Americans and making plastic faced robot Zuckerberg even richer.

The deep state in America: the NGOs, unrepresentative forces of law that control you through dis-representation and the fraud of democracy, controls the corporations, and they go along willingly.

What does all this have to do with Ashli Babbit, you may ask.

It is all connected. Who is Ashli Babbit, really? It is obvious she did not bleed out in that beautiful, life-like poli-wood creation. Did she get an Oscar or at least an Oscar nomination? No, not much acting involved in that short, but perfect, scene.

Has anyone seen dissections of the videos on eff bee? No, it is all totally shut down.

Information, truth, real education has all but been eliminated for We, the People, the marked and threatened masses. Good luck all. You, I, we are all watched controlled and much more vulnerable than you think.

It is time to get together with neighbors you know and set up neighborhood watches. Trust nobody, including the police.

If a disturbance in your neighborhood arises, and the police respond quickly, beware. Of course this is not absolute because some neighborhoods and police forces are still constitutionally sound: your rights entrenched and respected.

The police in my small city seem to be under attack through the governments, local mayors and state officials. I trust my police but all it takes is one hired goon dressed as a cop, and you can be in trouble.

Senator mutt romney is part of the collusion with international bolsheviks. Everything he does and says is anti-constitutional, or anti- We, the People.

He, it, is a bigger player in this cabal than everyone thinks. He led Antifa and BLM to the proper, unguarded side of the capital building. This is why, as some videos show, the police had to go to these spots. The dumb lib media reported Romeny was there.

I wrote a more explicit article regarding romney’s evil, fraud and crimes. He had Matt Walters killed. A butterfly swimmer, in top shape, does not die of a heart attack, especially in the pool while swimming. Watt knew of romney’s corruption during the Salt Lake City Winter games, and was murdered.

Any teacher that violates your child’s innocence with perversion and hate, deserves a lesson, and I, speaking for the silenced masses, hereby give you permission to exact teaching opportunities for teachers and school boards who violate your children. It is not revenge. Punishment for crime serves more important principles. When a society sees retribution for crime, it is a deterrent. Who is deterring the violations against your children, especially when you also go along with evil, willingly? Are you, as a parent, so dumb?

The best approach is to change your life styles and get your children out of public de-education.

Where did Ashli Babbit learn to act, in public de-education?

RESPONSE TO CRAIGSLIST POST 6/21/16, “Scientific evidence for warming of the climate system is unequivocal.”

RE: “Scientific evidence for warming of the climate system is unequivocal.” 

The following is my response to a post on craigslist in Salt Lake City, June 21, 2016.

In this post the “writer” plagiarizes NOAA with the title of the post and numerous claims throughout.

I write:

Show us the evidence.

What is a climate system? Is dimwit dem/lib talking about a “clime”, or maybe a weather front? These are real terms that reveal real science, understanding, and real knowledge, while “.warming of the climate system…” is at best a non-scientific construct of an alien-structured grammatical mess. Who, what, fabricated this poor collection of words and terms?

Do these dem/libs, fabricating goofy terms and words, think others will wet themselves and follow in line behind simpletons that cannot construct a rational thought?

What is a “…climate system”? What is, “Warming of the climate system…”? Climate is  warming and cooling. This dem/lib is speaking in circles to confuse readers and dazzle unsuspecting readers with his/her/its sophistry (look it up).

Scientific evidence? How could there be evidence when there is no data? Where are the volumes and pages of lists of university studies by PHD students submitting their theses?

Where are the measurements, data? Evidence is non-existent without data and a measurement or two. Anyone can pick a topic, go to a library, look up in the indexes for studies done by PHD students on almost anything. This is cutting edge stuff. Anyone can go to the library, look up climate topics and find numerous studies showing the temperatures are dropping.

Suppose I make a claim to illustrate my superior knowledge.

“I know a yard is longer than a meter”, I state.

“How do you know?”, you ask. I reply. “I just know.”

You press, “how long is a yard?” I say, “pretty long, the evidence shows it.” You ask, “how long is a meter?”

I reply, “almost as long as a yard.” You think you have me so you ask me, “If you are comparing the two, how can you know one is longer than the other if you cannot actually compare them. How can you know anything about either measurement if you refer to no studies that compare them, and if you cannot define how long either is?” I reply, “I just know it, the evidence is there.”

Anyone, at this point would ask, “what evidence?”

Besides the fact that I would be dead wrong regarding a yard being longer than the meter, one could also note I totally rejected scientific methodology.

A meter is a full yard plus 3.6 more, MORE inches, making a meter longer than a yard. That is a comparison using a common standard of measuring, to compare the two. This qualifies as data applied. Using one or the other as a standard, and then comparing, would be considered data.

You ask me again, to explain the comparison between the two, and how I can make a comparison without actually comparing variables; without common measurements or data to compare. I reply, “scientific evidence for measuring the measure of a longer yard than a meter, is unequivocal.” At this point you realize you are talking to an uneducated, egomaniacal moron, just as we, the educated and honest conservatives try to communicate with dem/libs, living in “I am special in liberal la-la-land.”

Using an inch to measure two “systems”, and then comparing, we see that a meter is longer than a yard, but a dem/lib would argue against that, if it meant he or she could propagate government stealing from all to give to the dem/lib frauds and liars.

Where is the science? This pseudo-science, injected presumptions played as credible facts, from dem/libs, is almost laughable.

Where is the data? Where is the hypothesis, the theory, the study parameters and interpretations of data? Where is the comparative unit of measure? These things are real characteristics of real science, and the dem/libs haven’t even got a clue how far from real science they are. Lying has a way of making one stupid. In essence, as mom and dad taught us, dem/libs are only fooling themselves.

There  is absolutely nothing credible from the bogus sites because everything is a fabrication.

Everything from liberals is just like my little brother, in third grade, “this guy I know…”, trying to fabricate credibility from a lie. Then he would ramble on to fabricate false truth and “science” to suit his goal, hoping to convince us to give him our money or whatever he wanted.

Notice too, that NOAA is a .gov entity. Government is part of this? Now there is a source for total dishonesty. Why do dem/libs pick and choose which lies from government they want to believe? Are dem/libs so lost in la-la-looney science land that they think it is okay for government to lie as long as it is only lying to conservatives and smart people? The average democrat is at least 10 IQ points below the average republican. Democrats have the uneducated Mexican/muslim vote to factor in their averages. I rest my case.

The fact is that more republicans graduate than democrats. How many Mexicans, do you know, that graduated from college? Do you know just one? The big fraud the democrats proffer is that Mexicans, invaders and the dregs of Mexico, work hard, vote, and are recipients of higher education. Such stupidity, claims connected by nothing except dem/lib lies, is hilarious.

Mexicans in college? How is that possible when the morons cannot even speak English? Who is more ignorant, the Mexican or the dem/libs that persist with bogus claims that are so easily refuted a third grade Mexican him or herself could refute the “lies”?

Remember this and you will know the liberal/progressive/fascist mind: they always want something for no contribution of their own but boast of two things: what they plan to contribute and what they plan to force others to contribute.

DEM/LIB ANTI-SCIENCE TRUTH

Originally published on earnwrite.com, author Brent, 2/11/14

Let us address this idea of republicans being anti-science, as dem/lib liars continually propagate. Do we understand what propagate means? Propagate means to continually express, “information, ideas, or rumors deliberately spread widely to help or harm a person, movement, group, institution, nation, etc.”

We know propaganda with a negative context, to spread misinformation and lies.

When I write of the tyranny-wing, left, lying liberals, I mean they propagate lies. Daily I write with conscience, working to dispel myths and outright fabrications by democrats and liberals regarding many topics. Their favorites are that republicans and republic-minded citizens (including tea party representatives) are anti-science,  conspiracy theorists, anti-government and pro-religion (to an extreme they call the religious right).

Specifically, however, this article refers to the liberal lies about science.

Is political science a science? Is physiology, math, physics, chemistry,  sociology, psychology science? “Ology” is the “study of…”.

Of the approximate 40 million democrat voters (again less than half) how many are Mexicans that don’t read, write, or speak English? How smart are they, being the dregs of Mexico that couldn’t find work, or wouldn’t, and have sub-standard education? Are these the educated masses in the democrat electorate?

By removing 20 to 30 million Mexicans from the ranks of “educated” democrats, the democrats become a smaller minority. If we keep the Mexicans in the count then the democrat easily becomes the dumber group. If we use a scientific education as a mark of the depth of science in one party or the other, the dem/libs lose, hands down. If the republicans are richer (not true), and knowing that affluence sends people to college, then amongst the whites there are more rich republicans in colleges, studying and learning science.

Education produces more science oriented people, especially those that go to the universities.

How many Congressmen and women have degrees in political science? Are they all democrats?

Looking at a cross section of America, anywhere, in any city, those on the “wrong side of the tracks”, in the poor parts of town, are always less educated. From these people, democrats themselves, claim they draw the masses’ support. What percentage of people from the wrong side of the tracks have a scientific background at a college level? To study a science and work in that field one must be scientific. To accept the realities of modern education one must accept the scientific method of proving or dispelling a hypothesis. Theory about anything is just imagination never applied, but science, the application of proven theory, is evidence of pro-science. How many college graduates, of people that live scientific methodology, are democrats and how many are republicans?

The most significant variable in science is, again, not what liars and propaganda specialists in the dem/lib ranks call science, but what it actually is. To know the scientific methodology is to BE scientific. Democrats, typically less educated, do have troubles with science. Ask 100 democrat supporters (including the corresponding non-conversant Mexican), what scientific methodology is. How many will know? Ask 100 republican supporters and tell us how many know.

The basics to science is action/reaction, stimulus/response, deductive reason and cause and effect. These are all cores to science methodology, the foundation of science. How many democrat supporters are lost in translation? How many democrat supporters are lost because they abandoned their own country because they were too ignorant to find work? This drops the democrat supporter scientific base to well below that of republican base. I have not done any studies, and only heard of one recently that debunks the myth of democrats being more scientific and having higher eduction. All one has to do is travel the buses and trains and listen to people complain about things the government needs to do for them. Not many that have studied political science would not know characteristics of tyranny, communism, marxism/fascism and other political ideologies, that less educated bus travelers could never understand. Not many outside of any science could not see the cause and effect of spending beyond budgets. And this is the dem/lib base.

Science is the study of relationships and measure of change. Consider geometry. How many Mexicans, or whites, or christian dem/libs know what a hypotenuse is? It is no stretch of the imagination that the poorer education system in Mexico produces poorer students. And these people are part of the overall intelligence, or lack thereof, in the dem/lib, sub-intellect, propaganda community. Sure there are professors that are dem/libs. There are also republican professors. I am one.

One argument the dem/libs front is that religion is anti science because it believes the world was created in six days as opposed to obvious evidence of “evolution”. The word evolution isn’t even used anymore as a term to describe adaptation of species. There are a lot more christian democrats than republican christians. Less educated = less scientific = more subject to mythology and non-science. Ignorance = faith. There are more faithful dem/libs than republicans. To have faith, that is blind faith or ignorance in government, is no different than having faith in a religious politician. There is not a single republican christian I know, that believes the world was created in six real days. To most republican, if not all, christians, six days of creation, is a metaphor. I would estimate that 50 % of democrats do not know what a metaphor is.

Not many even believe it was created. But to the ignorant that know nothing of evolution, survival of the fittest, adaptation, etc., faith in anything is easier than telling your children you are an ignorant dimwit. The dem/lib mantra that ‘the guv’mint will take care of us’ is no different a faith in false deity than the judeo-christian faith in much more prominent beings that have survived through millennia.

The republican anti-science myth is easily propagated amongst the less educated, more susceptible to manipulation, lower middle class Americans, that fill the dem/lib electorate, in the ever dwindling minority.

A FOUNDATION OF MISINFORMATION REGARDING PUBLIC AND HIGHER EDUCATION.

A FOUNDATION OF MISINFORMATION REGARDING PUBLIC AND HIGHER EDUCATION. Edited September 3, 2018

On the Charlie Rose talk show, October 26, 2012, Pelosi stated, “The most important thing you can do for growth is to invest in education.”

In my opinion, the cliché of ‘investing in education’ is socialist dogma. It is propagated fraud and disingenuously passed for principle. Has anyone followed the bouncing dollar through education? Why does the public believe this cliché? In everything, follow the dollars.

Nancy Pelosi’s words, spoken like a true dem/lib raider of productive people’s resources and gains, was not questioned by Chucky Rose. To allow lies to propagate is a crime against civility. Crimes that result in loss (taxes), eviction (IRS), Obamacare (genocide- have YOU read the 2700 pages?) are crimes against humanity. What is Chucky reporting? The dogma that education creates a civilized society has been dogmatized for over a century. Utah is one state that fought public education, and held out the longest. The law, wherein a few forced their decisions upon many that resisted, used force. Study the history of forced public education in America, read the dogma of “educators” and “leaders” and it sounds like communism propagating its wonderful, fake utopia.

Dem/libs know that any idea can be expanded, any fraud and lie can be expanded from a well established lie to more encompassing and overwhelming impositions. The dem/libs use this decalogue to expand their false ideas. The establishment media today is the well spring of accepted deception and organized theft.

Let us take a look at the dollar that is spent sending a child to university. Consider the expenses.

Consider savings by two working adults over 20 years, to send a child to a school of higher education, compared to spending the same amount on property and
Twenty thousand dollars spent on higher education is a loss, for the most part. When a trade of goods and services transpires something of value is exchanged. A purchase of a car for 20,000, for example, provides jobs for others, sends cash through an economy in a free market system that is NOT fraught with fraud or inefficiency, and it provides unquestionable benefits, one being ownership of property.

There is absolutely nothing produced by education, except taxation for costs, forced upon the public.

 Education is NOT efficient. Setting aside the real measures of education, there is no gain, no goods produced, and no exchange of goods and services. The education “trade in goods and services” is a sacrifice of real property for air, for thought, for a puff of smoke that provides nothing substantial, solid or useable. The same, so-called gains in education can be acquired by apprenticeship.

Apprenticeship is a long gone economic exchange. Today it has been replaced by mentor-ship: slave labor. Slave labor of mentorship has two aspects. One being the actual effort expended for the gains of the mentor, and the other more significant aspect, less noticed, is the required commitment to ideology where government controls the programs. Democrats and liberals use the mentorship program to a fuller political end than republicans. Dem/libs use mentorship to indoctrinate the young beneficiaries to further ideological/class slavery.

Make no mistakes about this reality of institution controlled by the dem/lib political machinery to gain forced volunteers. The systems are designed to infiltrate institutions for gains for people in office.

 Suppose all students that entered college graduated. How many sociologists would flood the market? Make no mistakes join this point either: it is a market. What jobs are available for sociologists? How many teaching, psychologist, economist, or nursing jobs are available to graduates? Higher education fills a much larger role than education.

The hard sciences such as physics, chemistry, math, engineering, biology, still produce more graduates, factoring in drop-out rates, than needed. Is that money wasted? Some argue yes, others argue no. Who benefits with student failure rates and why are these high rates not addressed and corrected? The education systems themselves require large failure rates to continue the pretentious necessity of higher education. The biggest gains of educational systems are for political provisions and, even greater gains are realized for the institutions themselves.

 Let us suppose a store owner hires someone to merchandise goods. There is a measurable relationship between hiring and profit. The same relationship does not exist in the education system. There is no profit relationship between hiring and profit. The relationship is totally internal. The profit gained by the institution is almost absolutely that which the student injects: that which the institution must exact and extract from the student. Furthermore, there is no tracking of gains the student makes when leaving institutions of higher education. If there were, I suspect, the fraud of institutional education would be exposed.

In fact I would add there is no value-added gains for higher education because there is no real competition and, hence, no way to make comparisons. How many engineers without degrees from higher education institutions can be compared to engineers with degrees? There is no available data to show engineers with degrees from educational institutionsIn earn more or less than engineers without degrees from institutions of higher education.

There is no measurable relationship between money spent educating a “worker” in any variety because the institutions have created a monopoly. The monopoly is always dangerous when forced to cooperate and “produce” under the aegis of government. We call this fascism and it is closely related to the same processes of communism. Some refer to it by a less auspicious title, socialism, as if there is some element of social production or gain. over a real free market system of meeting needs for specialists.

There is a unique profit from education: for those that knowingly or in ignorance exploit future “workers”. The biggest profits derive from direct exchange of money for education.

The house Mr. and Mrs. Jones mortgaged for a second time to pay for a chance of a 15% success rate in a business venture, is a bad investment. Welcome to higher education. The Joneses would never engage such a risk against real property

 Of course politicos will argue that education is paramount to the growth of the student. It is a lie upon which many arguments are won without challenge. Most money spent in education goes up in smoke. Most students are educated in systems but few truly learn.

Listen to Pelosi, Obama, and Jim Matheson and recognize the talk of commendable efforts to educate the youth are based upon unchallenged presumptions and economic fallacies. It is magic how classical conditioning sets morons free; free of reality and its consequences. But it does not.

 Is the debt quotient high with education, and to whom are the educated in debt? Is debt slavery or not?

The most destructive aspect is parents’ imposed responsibility, to the institutions of education, that appear as commitments to their children. These imposed commitments to institutions appear as commitments to children while they ultimately waste and squander resources, wealth and security. Why is a parent responsible for a child’s education? Who says, besides the bankers, educators and politicos, that spending real profit and fruit of labor on a child’s education is a valued parental responsibility? Who says, but the institutions that gain, that this imposed responsibility makes good citizens from foolish investments? Where is the connection? Non-existent.

Who gains, the student? No. Most money spent on higher education (including high school) is a waste. Why? Because learning is learning. Learning is NOT teaching. The best teachers receive no accoldaes or recognition when teaching rocks. Education has no real connection for students when it is disconnected by the fake morality of higher education, and worse when it is further disconnected by another’s payment. This IS why government wants to “help” students go to college. The loss and inevitable debt and disconnection to reality produces de-educated slaves and transfers wealth from parents for air, paper, and empty unfulfilled wishes.

Most money spent by parents, giving up real property, is worse than an investment loss. In all public education institutions the losses never measured are tragedies experienced in ways never mentioned.

The social, familial and mental disruptions and losses are not measured nor mentioned by the institutions, naturally.

Where do children learn about drugs? School. Where do children pick up diseases? School. Where do children acquire social maladies, such as cheating, lying, and anti-social behavior? School.

At best, 10% of graduates work in their chosen field of study. Who then, gains from money spent on a 90% chance of failure? In a real free market situation money parents set aside for their children’s education would not be considered investment capital. It is not spoken of as investment except in ethereal terms because of the manipulation of institutions and the establishment political ravaging that plagues Americans.

Even wild-cat oil drillers don’t invest with that poor risk of loss.

 Education, considering the overall numbers of invested students, and the poor successes following graduates, produces worse success rates. The hard professions, so few actually, have success in procuring work in the field of study, but it is such a small percentage of the population of students, that too is a dismal failure. How many new engineers, doctors, nurses, and dentists and a few other high profile professions successfully enter the workforce?

The word itself, “workforce”, is dogmatic, carefully established in every society, to describe and identify the sub-elite, the stable, non-moving non-political class of the tapped, tagged and taxed masses. Public education, in reality, entertains 99%. Who is the one percent? Are there connections to the rich one percent Obama speaks of? Absolutely.

Let us also consider the profession of teaching. There is nothing else so well devolved today that fails so purely (next to politicos and government agents) than teachers. Teaching is self-perpetuating, and a drain, producing little more than talk, air, and paper.

There is very little actually produced as a result of education, and less produced intrinsically in education. How is this a viable investment? Do we measure success by production or potential production? Who is education not subjected to the same standards of success that the “workplace” experiences?

 Next we must speak of the lies built upon this grass-roots fraud the dem/libs and most republicrats proffer.

Have we all heard ads and politicians speak of higher education being a parental responsibility? Who mentions this except those who gain financially? The question, then, follows, is it truly a parent’s responsibility to surrender real gains, profits and property for ethereal hope? How have come to believe this? Who placed in our minds and the pblic mind that it is the parents responsibility to pay for students faiklure?

Again, who gains? Banks, taking real cash in exchange for slavery, are the winners. Public liars (politicians) are always excited about creating dependency because it is slavery. It is organized, transfer of wealth to nothing, fostered by politicos, iconized by politicos, while it is the political class and their friends who line their pockets with collected cash that “should” go to real education.

Obama’s friends made a killing these last four years, and teachers that do nothing except sell false hope in exchange for indirect gains through forced volunteerism in the failing education market, acquire real property.

We must surely visit the issue of the how government “people”, hardly people in reality, have fastened chains, though unions and regulations, around the necks of all educators and their allies in the political class.

Has anyone ever though to question, check, or ask what percentage of ‘more education investments’ goes to paying for better educators? From where do we acquire this idea that the also acclaimed importance of ‘better skilled teachers’ deserves increases in education spending?

What skills do teachers have that others, including parents do not? I would argue the only skill that “better skilled teachers” have is information accessibility.

There seems to not only be a clear discrepancy in the taxation increases, promised for education, that actually gets to education, as opposed to the educators.

Some of the presumptions built upon education misinformation is that higher education makes skilled workers. Wrong! When so few graduate, we must look more at the failure rates that are absolutely, infinitely, more revealing about the poor investment results that affect vast majorities, as a result of failure to make skilled “workers”

 Apprenticeship programs have been with mankind since the dawn of time and have, irrefutably and unquestionably, produced skill.

 Boys working with fathers has transferred skill from generation to generation for millennia.

The fallacy sponsored by the political class and their allies in education, that education is good for an economy; that it produces growth, is far from the truth.

 There is economic growth in education and almost no growth from education in the work place or free market. An economy does not growth without real production.

The next argument dem/libs and con/repubs make for education is that it is a moral responsibility. How is a failure, a moral, in any way? How is taking trillions from Americans to give billions to a single player in the auto industry, fair and economically balanced? Apply the same to higher education and we see, irrefutably, that the political force and educational profession dwell and thrive in our failed education economy.

How can we witness education, and related industries somehow skirting the issue of economic failure? Why do we allow a political and educational class, a minority of overpaid blackmailers, to claim education is a moral duty to throw the masses’ property away for twisted hope of mass failure for the few the elite identify and promote?

What of the violation, mentally and financially of students themselves?

 Are we aware of the results of education: transfer of wealth, poor skill acquisition (reading, for example), poor communication skills forced upon students through social escapes, pregnancies and abortions that destroy the female conscience.

 There is much to be discussed, and much to be discarded regarding education and higher education.

A further investigation and dissection of the subversive efforts by change agents in the education systems, must be exposed. Look for further commentary regarding public and higher eduction.