PART 4: “NASA OBSERVATORY RECORDS UNUSUAL ACTIVITY ON THE SUN.”

Lucifer-sam writes, “Space is very big and, often, very weird.” Dufus, liar supreme sam continues, “Last week, an image captured by…”

What is an image?

An image? Captured? How does one capture an imagined non-sequitur?

Even nasa admits, every day, they have no actual photos or reality.

Please, take note that the words image and imagine have the same latin root word and mean, “less than real: circa 1200”, ”a piece of statuary; artificial representation that looks like a person or thing,” Also defined as, “reflection in a mirror” , early 14th century.

So a nasa image is either a reflection, an artificial representation, or less than real, but not real.

So nasa’s theories regarding distances are not real. The distance of one is dependent upon the unreal, artificial distances of others. All are dependent upon unreal, imagined, and superficial distances that not only cannot be substantiated, but cannot substantiate anything claimed to be in association. NOTHING is real.

Imagine means visualizing the unreal, “to create something in one’s mind.”

Not a shred of reality to NASA imagination, but who creates these nothings? Who portrays and depicts and represents these artificial creations? People, or “people” do this.

These image creators and liars are evil people, so devious and degenerate, they cannot be considered people or human.

One can see video, actual film, of rocket lift-offs, burning fuel and fire and brimstone; rockets lifting into the sky, perhaps 10 miles or 20 miles, but the connections of these obvious realities to “space”, is absolutely non-existent, and beyond the unknown distance of the cover of the atmosphere to where “space” begins, nothing is real.

I speculate regarding distances and heights. I am free to speculate because nobody, including nasa has a single measurement for substantiating anything.

Please find something! Find an equation or measurement nasa has measured, applied and used to calculate anything.

There is no film in existence of a rocket lifting into the atmosphere beyond what nasa actually allows to be filmed, and more nothing at heights greater than nasa’s allowances.

This is all luciferian black magic, sleight of hand. The rocket disappears from view and most people assume it goes into “space” because people are told that is what happens.

What is the height a rocket reaches before it is gone from view?

If nasa wanted to convince we the people that a rocket travels to “space”, why not use computer technology to direct a telescope to follow it, and get actual film footage? Because it does not happen as the luciferian liars claim.

Imagine you are beside the track, watching a bobsled pass. For how much time of that whole run of two minutes, do you actually see the bobsled go by?

When rockets are launched, for how long do you see any piece of video, as the rocket passes? Did you notice the “rocket” does not leave the visual? How can that be when it zooms past at miles per second? It is imagery, drawn, fabricated to give classically conditioned minds something to believe: fabrications of faith in nasa’s religion.

Unless you are in a craft, or a video camera is in a craft traveling with or following the rocket image, as shown in the video, a camera attached to a point high in the atmosphere, would see the rocket cross its view for a fraction of a second, not what the video shows. Again, what object traveling with the rocket filmed the video “image” of the rocket burning to “space”?

From :13 to :16, of the animation the rocket stays in view without change. Impossible:

https://www.yahoo.com/news/this-week-in-space-sun-exoplanet-kuiper-belt-154354360.html

Something such as a video camera or CGI animation, follows the so-called rocket into the atmosphere. As film, this video depiction is impossible, as the article states, depiction. Video depiction, as shown, is impossible unless two rockets are launched together, one to film the other.

At highest velocity, the luciferians claim, the rocket escapes the atmosphere traveling 14 miles per second, or 25,200 mph. Doing the math of space theory or atmosphere height theory, where would a video camera need to be to watch a rocket pass it while remaining in view for 4 seconds, without change in size or position? The video is totally bogus, fabricated, imagined and drawn with CGI. That is the only explanation.

Even at an average velocity of only 1/10th the escape velocity of 25,200 mph, the rocket should escape the atmosphere in a matter of seconds, clearly out of range of any constant view for more than a fraction of a second. I am sure one can calculate the velocity derived from so-called force, if one has the thrust measurements of so-called rocket engines.

I am not about to go this deep into the equation, formulae and theorized distance from earth to “space”. You find the equations and measurements nasa claims exist, and report back here. I contend that nothing of the sort exists.

How long does it take for the rocket to reach max velocity, is one question of the whole theory, never shown in full. NEVER!

Even at 1/10th escape velocity of 25,200 mph, it is impossible a rocket could travel without breaking up. You could not even imagine anything traveling at 2,520 mph. The Concorde hit speeds of 1250 mph.

Rockets, we are led to believe, hit maximum speed of 25,200 mph? The acceleration in a 300 to 330 mile window of the atmosphere, would create a g-force that would crush rocks strapped into seats. It is 105 miles per second, according to theory. According to theory, how fast does the world rotate?

Do not forget that the rocket travels at an estimated velocity, not a measured velocity. Nobody, nothing can measure that high speed.

All anybody ever really need do to dissect and thrash stupid nasa, “space” and “globe” theories is to think and ask questions. How do you know that? Can you show me the calculation?

Based on what is that theory or presumption? How does nasa know the escape velocity of any rocket they claim launches into “space”? How then, does nasa know what is needed to escape the atmosphere, and what is the true distance of the height of the atmosphere?

Nothing is known: not a single thing yet magically nasa produces images, depictions and other fake film and photos of disconnected “space”, “space” travel, and moon and sun theorizing.

PART 3: “NASA OBSERVATORY RECORDS UNUSUAL ACTIVITY ON THE SUN.”

Now, finally, open the article, read and watch the animation.

The title of the article reads, “the sun just did something weird, and 3 other space stories you may have missed this week”.

The sun did something weird? How does nature that can only act natural, do something weird? How dumb. How is nature weird? How does the sun, totally untouched and unaffected by earth become weird?

What are the pre-test conditions and data, and post-test conditions, from which nasa makes comparisons to state the sun did something different or weird? Pre-test and post test, science, is absolutely missing from this goofy article. How utterly ridiculous can nasa luciferians get?

The subscript reads, “An oddball new exoplanet, small but significant steps toward the future of spaceflight and a mystery in the Kuiper Belt.”

“Oddball”? Wow, that is so scientific it is scary. What a stupid thing to write. How does a thing without feet step? What stupid clichés can only follow stupid “people”,

A “new exoplanet”? A new planet discovered? “Exo”, as in external? There can only be an “exo” if there is an “endo”, or internal. And what determines ”exo” and “endo”? No comparators, no examples, no parameters or definitions, just stupid words and pieces tossed about to confuse and create education chaos. This is bloody, evil deception.

See how the luciferian liars toss in terms and words that mean nothing so they can sound smart and expert, so they can lie with impunity and control you first with fear and then LAW that follows your response to fear they create.

How much farther from earth than the sun, is this theorized planet?

If all nasa can provide is an animated depiction of the moon from earth, while the sun is even more out of the realm of visual possibility, then a new planet, even more distant than that, cannot be seen or discovered.

How utterly science-retarded can nasa get?

If the sun is impossible to see because the moon is impossible to see, then some crazy, theorized, fabricated, imagined new “exoplanet”, farther away, is absolutely impossible, and absolutely impossible to film or photograph.

The subscript reads, “An oddball new exoplanet… in the Kuiper Belt.”

There is no Kuiper belt because there is no measurement or substantiated distance. There is no relationship of these heavenly bodies therefore they do not exist. The distance to the sun is theorized to be 400 times the distance of the moon from earth, but the distance of moon from earth is not calculated so none of what follows, the whole of globe theory and nasa, is not substantiated and does not exist.

Sure, go ahead, build a house on a pretend foundation, and you don’t have a house, an attic, a garage. You don’t have walls, windows, doors and heat. It is impossible to build something on nothing.

Nasa and globe theory is all so much building on nothing. Show us the calculation of the distance of earth to moon. From that, maybe, one could extrapolate information, a measurement or two, to plug into an equation to calculate something from that foundation. Nothing!

I can line up 3 yard sticks, then four yardsticks at a right angle to the three, and then aim five yardsticks from the end of the three yard sticks to the end of the four yard sticks and create a right angle triangle. This is known as a 3, 4, 5 right triangle. It can be used to create a right angle for building something. You can see it. You can watch the creation of it and how it works. You can see the application of it in making a 90 degree angle out of measurements that can only come together in one way.

There is absolutely nothing of the sort, and less in partiality that lends credibility to anything luciferian nasa fabricates. Show us the one point fixed in space, not “space”, from which other variables are derived, measured and used to calculate anything? Nasa still does not have definitive distance of the end of the atmosphere, or beginning of “space” so the distance of earth to moon is impossibly known.

But, don’t believe me. Look at the animation. Look at the words of the article itself, written, fabricated by science-retard, sam matthews.

These yahoo”NEWS” writers are so dishonest and evil, they do not deserve capitalized names, being liars and devils that deserve no human recognition for their crimes against truth, reality, and humanity.

IMPOSSIBLE NASA/YAHOO”NEWS”, FEBRUARY 11, 2023, “NASA OBSERVATORY RECORDS UNUSUAL ACTIVITY ON THE SUN.”

The sub script to the headline reads, “Other space highlights from the week”

Upon opening the following is the article:

https://www.yahoo.com/news/this-week-in-space-sun-exoplanet-kuiper-belt-154354360.html

It is almost comical that fake, NASA science can see 93 million miles.

93,000 miles is impossible, and much less 1,000 times as much, 93,000,000 miles.

You must understand that just because we can see sunlight coming to us from theorized distance, does not mean we can see the distance of 93 million miles? It is theory that the sun is 93 million miles away. You must surely recognize the distance is not proved, formulated, or equated. No?

Can you find one measurement by NASA or globe theory that injects one number into an equation that measures, by triangulation, for example, the distance of the sun from the earth?

How do you measure distance? You walk it, drive it, or use triangulation to measure known variables and then use constants to calculate.

How else could someone determine the distance except by one or another equation or formula? It is impossible to look straight at an object even 93 yards away, and determine distance, and even more bizarre to think someone or something can look straight on and determine a distance over i.760 billion times greater.

When the guesstimate was made, did a survey transit with the capacity to measure a distance of 93 million miles exist? How about 93 miles, 9.3 miles?

Does such a survey instrument exist today?

How, anywhere in any realm of science, can a single eye, uni-vision of a telescope look straight on and determine the distance of any object? Do telescopes measure height of shadows cast by one planet on another?

The scenarios for guess and speculating are ludicrous, and anyone who thinks someone is telling any bit of truth when they speculate these ridiculous theories, is living in near-absolute ignorance.

Suppose you can see from one town to the next, can you look down the road and determine the distance? Can you do it better with a telescope or binoculars? No, it is worse with a telescope.

Can you look at your odometer and see the numbers click as you drive? How did the auto manufacturers derive a correct measure and place it in mechanism of an odometer?

It starts with a smaller measurement, the length of a foot and yard.

We know a certain number of feet and/or yards makes a mile. We could walk that distance with a wheel on a stick with a counter and use geometry with the measure of the circumference to determine distance.

We could look at a tower from one town to another, measure with a protractor the angle of ascent, and inject the known height of the tower to calculate the distance. It is all built upon measurements, equations and calculations.

For distance to the sun, or moon, or clouds, there is no measurement, not one, no equations ever used and nothing exists to be calculated. There is nothing, not a shred of data in existence to determine almost everything nasa and globe-theory pretend-science claims.

Not knowing the angle of ascent or the height of the tower, could anyone look straight at the pinnacle of the tower and know the distance along the level to the base? No! A million guesses might put someone close, but do it now for something hundreds of miles away. Impossible, and absolutely impossible for just the distance of the moon.

Please, globe-theory believers, show us the equation and numbers, used to determine the distance of the sun from earth.

Oh wait, it is based on other distances of planets. From what measurements, equations and calculations are these distances derived? None: all speculation and fabrication as well?

Make it easy, show us the measurements, angle and equation used to measure the distance of the moon from earth, 238,000 miles. Even NASA only shows an animated representation. Do your own goofle search. The search I found claims one can see the distance from earth to moon in an “animated depiction”.

Animated? Depiction? Drawings with numbers drawn, done in CGI? If nasa can only show the distance of the moon in an animated depiction, a cartoon, how on earth can anyone believe nasa can see the surface of the sun, according to theory, 390 times as far?

Again, not a single measurement or shred of data exists.

Now notice the image of this “sun” is quite detailed, according to animation, cartoon, drawing, CGI. It is a depiction, not video. From what is the depiction derived if there is no visual? It is imagined, a lie. From whose mind did this imagination come? I believe the surface of the sun looks like Kamala harris’ cheese face. I imagine it, and now I CGI it. How stupid can NASA get to think their whacko theories and imaginations fool people.

D’oh, they fool some.

If the depiction drives from a photo or video clip, why not publish the photo or video clip? Is the answer obvious to you? There is no reality to the imagined pretense. There is absolutely no reality to any visual of the sun.

Please take note that it is two very different things to see the sun’s rays lighting up the world, but quite another thing to see the surface of the sun. It is one thing to feel warmth coming from some unknown distance, but it is impossible for mankind to develop a camera or instrument of any kind, to see the sun, 93 million, 93,000,000 miles away,

THREE STRIKES AND GLOBE-GOONIES ARE OUT: CHRIS NATION, ART GILLES AND DANIEL D. SMITH

Unbelievable, astounding science-based, logical, deductive and super-intellectual responses from the NASA paid political agents proving NASA’s integrity and “science”.

The “points” and “logic” of these perfectly sound and witty comments has sent me reeling, feeling lost, beaten, alone and drifting in the world. I am now quite certain, with the irrefutable points these intelligence superstars have made, that my view of the world has changed.

First up to bat, Chris Nation. Chrissy’s words of wit:

“Yes…very funny indeed…”

Can anyone tell us to what chris nation is referring?

Second batter, Art Gilles:

“bite down harder”

Wow, another astounding point made in favor of globe-earth theory. I am suffering, sweltering with embarrassment at how silly my scientific methodology is compared to the ….dare I say, gawd-like talent evinced by bolshevik-dick, arty.

Third bolshevik-dick, I mean, third batter, daniel d. smith. May I add, so precious is little cutie’s lie it is funny dick-dan writes. Dan-dick’s comment:

“Watch it again and start to really look at the video. The guy in red you can clearly see is an edited video but some conspiracy nutjob forget to edit out the wire as you can see it floating which means he would not have “dropped” that thing that fast.

It’s all edited to disprove nasa for the narrative of a flat earth.”

“and start to really look….”? Dick-daniel is just too lost from reality to even get language close. Did dick write… “Start to…”? Why not just simply go to the NASA website and get the source? Deflect and distract, dick-daniel, the bolshevik sub-intelligent goon “leader”. LOL. Danielsan-dick is the leader of the goon squad, and there are more.

More from me, intellect connected to gawd…

hahahahaha, dick-daniel, digging and digging, running while he sets his air on fire with anger, like the others. No picture of earth from “space”…., NOT ONE, EVER, just dig and lie, and distract and lie, and deflect and lie and lie and lie and lie. What a loser!

Can somebody verify the source of the video in question….is NOT, NAAAAAAAAAWT a plane(t) earth edit? Doesn’t that video come from NASA itself, and danny-dick knows it and LIES like a filthy bolshevik-whore!

D’oh, did daniel bolshevik-dick forget that very, VERRRRRRY important fact, FAAAAAAAACT?

I got your back d-man. See your profile up at my site, giving you all the props you deserve.

Conspiracy….? Too funny. Only loser libs, progressive bolsheviks, and globe-earth theorists accuse others of conspiracy. And so what! THAT very vid, the one dicky-dan claims is edited by a “flat-earther” is the one posted at NASA. Let me repeat that for all investigating and those who want to know the depth of the disgusting sub-human bolshevik scum, globe-earth theorist daniel-dick bolshevik: THE VERY SAME ONE POSTED ON THE NASA SITE.

Three strikes boys. You’re outta here!

Send the next three goons. A song comes to mind…”Send in the Clowns” Next line, “…don’t bother, they’re here.

FAKE GLOBE-EARTH THEORY PROFILE: GREG DAVIS’ COMMENT AND MY REPLY

Greg Davis: “you’re not a scientist. I’ve already shut you down effortlessly. You’re just a lonely guy looking to feel important. I know your type very well. I study it. If you actually want to talk about something real, our deal still stands. I will reward you with information on one point, and a fun sticker, for every direct question you engage on-topic with a direct answer. If you’re not up for that, or simply cannot, then don’t bother speaking again. This is a discussion forum, designed to facilitate intelligent conversation about specific topics relating to the shape of the earth. It’s not a free-for-all to perpetuate insults and hate by miserable cockroaches. That is all”

My reply:

A legend in your own mind. Shut me down, with what, CGI and drawings? How would you know I am not a scientist when you do not know the first thing about experimentation, scientific methodology, or even the language of science? You are morally and cause-and-effect backward.

How do you presume to know I am a lonely guy? Who the hell do you think you are? You trailer-trash loser presumptuous lying piece of rat crap.

You have nothing, not even a real profile. What did you provide that shut me down? Make a point, loser! How many laboratory experiments have you engineered and conducted? You can’t even speak science terminology you are so uselessly uneducated. Well, I have a pic of your profile and will publish it with your stupid words and my reply. Not even sure what loser point you think you made, but the fundamentals escape your limited lying mind. There is no science when there is no data, no observaion, and without an actual photo there is no beginning of science for globe-theory.

Globe-theory cannot even be called that until an observation is made, and there is nothing, and you know it you lying treasonous bolshevik bastard.

Can you not wrap your little mind around that reality, or are you that sick and twisted to lie to such sick extent? Wait for it, wait for it: liberalnewsreview.com

FAKE GLOBE-EARTH THEORY PROFILE: ROGER BARNETT COMMENT AND MY REPLY, 1/10/22

Barnett: “The earth’s shape is not a theory. it’s been known for millenia and has been quantified to closer and closer tolerances as time and scientific advances progress. FE? Bwahaa…. It’s nonsensical drivel..or dribble for those that foam it out their mouthes.”

Scores and scores of fake profiles all doing nothing but post fake-science, amazingly all in favor of globe-theory earth. Something is surely going on that brings so many ignorant goons together to propagate so many, and all the same, lies.

My Reply:

Known by whom? What tolerances? Barnett has no idea, surely regurgitating spew from his/her/its master handler. Again, Roger, tell us, what tolerances? What is the margin of error? Tell us what scientific progress it is that uses CGI and drawings to make a fake photo of earth, when nobody has ever been “in space”? You lying pos. Known by whom, Aristotle, Heracles, Herodotus, Jason and the Argonauts, Dustin the wind? What a loser! Nobody has known for millennia. What a sewage-sucking fraud! It is that simple.

For all reading this, by many things bolshevik-dick wrote, you can surely see how ignorant and un-scientific everything of dick-roger’s comment is. But, especially and specifically obvious is this: how does one “quantify” something that is not a quantity?

Known for millennia? Who are you trying to fool? Even the dumbest of dumb, you anti-science, scientific methodology retards cannot be so stupid to totally ignore reality AND history. Are you really so stupid and grotesquely, fat, ugly and lying!

Your stupid pretense (millennia) is not only a stretch of gross magnitude, considering the Bible has been around for millennia, but even you, a real pseudo-person cannot be that stupid to ignore the reality that globe-theory is a theory. Do you realize that when someone says a word they mean it, like theory means theory?

But it is okay. I get where you are coming from and I have a picture of your “profile” and will post it to my site, with my reply, a shit-kicking for you for all to see, and beyond so others can see just how fake and politically motivated, sub-human you filthy bolshevik NASA agents are. You lie like a rat you filthy rotten agent provocateur.

EXISTENTIAL CHINESE SUPERSONIC MISSILE PROVIDES OPPORTUNITY FOR CLARIFICATION OF SCIENTIFIC METHODOLOGY

“China has a missile that was previously thought impossible”

Yes, China has a missile nobody thought could be created, but there is evidence it can exist; that it could have been created. This evidence is observation that other missiles exist and technology applied and working in other areas has a potential to be applied to create supersonic missile technology.

This is the first phase of scientific methodology: observation.

The theory of flying bombs is more than just theory. “Flying” bombs exist. We know it. In science terminology, we call this observation. Predicting, another phase of science, is extending already observed realities using existing technology, not theory. This makes an extension of known observations possible and believable.

This extension is not possible where there is no observation such as fake disciplines of climate changeling and “space” travel/globe-theory.

Again, theory based on theory is bad theory and can predict absolutely nothing except silly imagination.

This fertilization of imagination-based theory is the core of modeling in “science” today, particularly climate changeling and globe-earth theory and “space” travel/globe-theory.

If all one can produce is unobservable imagination of modeling and fake theory based on unsubstantiated theory, then one has nothing. When theory is based on theory, there is no evidence from which a reality can be extrapolated. This is climate changeling today, and globe-eath/space speculation.

All one need to do, to observe the unobservable climate-changeling and “space travel/globe-theory theories, is to pay attention to the words of those who promote: “models”.

DEM/LIB POLITICAL AGENTS JUST CANNOT HIDE THEIR HATRED AND INCAPACITY TO CONTROL THEMSELVES: FACEBOOK RESPONSE DECEMBER 21 2021

Update, January 9, 2022: I have been taking pictures of profiles of those with whom I contend. I went back to find Monty’s profile, GONE!

It is time to not just boycott craigslist. It is time to interfere and destroy. I ask all those who do not use craigslist to go to craigslist and flag everything and anything. Flag for five minutes every day. It is too bad that there are innocent people that will be compromised, but better they find out now, and find better, ethical advertising. The owners/administrators of CL are evil, liars, haters of mankind, suppressing truth so evil can control.

I apologize for not copying Monty Skreeder’s original comment, found on facebook. Hopefully a rough idea of his twisted argument can be extrapolated from what I present in this one-sided commentary. There are so many comments by “people” without profiles. They are political profiles.

I hesitate to do this because I do not want the bolsheviks to get information that provides feedback that facilitates their capacities to change and improve their evil tactics. But, it has been my experience they can’t adapt anyway, being so stuck in their narratives and lies.

However, I bring this to your attention so you can test and grade future “discussions”.

Monty Skreeder got stuck, like a skipping record, he could not stop yakking about Trump. Do you see the absolute ignorant hatred? The dementocrat bolsheviks whip themselves into a frenzy of hate, and cannot control themselves. Their hate makes them act like dogs that just cannot stop barking at their own shadows.

Bolshevik-dick, Monty Skreeder, whatever, mainlined a hold on one point, and one point only, while I injected scores of points. Like a dumb bulldog, he could not let go, and it was/is his destruction. More than losing a discussion, being so caught up in one lie, one pretentious interpretation that he thinks dispels all other Constitutionalist interpretations, MS bleeds himself before the totalitarian centralized government globalist bolshevik movement, to destruction. Yes, that is a mouthful, but they are all connected. Organic Act of 1871 is one such example of the globalist evil seizing control of OUR country, with international banker/gangster fiat money.

MS, like all liars, thinks that if he can win one point of an argument or discussion, lying primarily to himself, it can be deduced the losing point of the opposing view, means the opposing view lied en toto, thus, that all claims are lies. I know this because it is the pattern and obvious goal one notices after hundreds, literally, of “discussion” with these moral misfits.

That is all the boneheads have, and it is not enough. You all see the numerous points I made, and still make while all that goon had was hatred. Look at the very last sentence of MS’s most recent comment… ‘hate Trump’.

I hesitate to admit this was a trap for the demented goon, like other goons that come and go. MS is like the monkey that puts its hand in a narrow necked vase to pull out a piece of fruit and when chased, will not, or does not have the brain capacity, to release the fruit that holds the monkey’s hand in the vase, that slows it from escaping.

Ms could not release his grip on one minor detail because it was connected to his hatred and his lies, and most important, his hope for winning on all points by default. Not gonna happen. MS could not, maybe cannot, escape his illogical insistence that his view, researched by a simpleton’s google, discarding the majority of constitutionalist interpretations, is lacking credibility and rationale. You decide.

This is not going to be easy for you. The enemies to your freedom and your right to choice and self-determination are at stake, and discerning your friends from foe is not going to be easy, but it must be done. Anybody who “gives” you freedom, can take it, and that is why tyranny lies and flatters, and then seizes, enslaves and kills. Where do you and yours want to be?

If my words and my “side” is as dangerous as dick claims, you had better know, and know how to avoid. But that is not the actual issue. The real challenge is YOU, knowing, from any source, real or fake, what is truth and who you can trust.

Again, READ and learn.

Abraham Lincoln, the great emancipator of ALL Americans, was asked how he studied and prepared for debate. He said he studied his opponent’s argument at least twice as much as his own. He needed to learn his opponent’s weaknesses, like you need to know your enemies’ conceit and fraud. I have laid much of it out for you. But, again, your freedom is yours to acquire and yours alone, or it belongs to those who deceive you.

I am sure this is not over. The bolsheviks never cease. Be ready, yourselves, to fight, or you will find yourselves in the clutches and control of the wrong “people”

A ONE DEGREE DEVIATION DUE TO SO-CALLED CURVATURE OF THE EARTH

Let us look at an object directly out to sea from a beach position.. There is a problem that most do not see. If the circumference of the earth is 24,901 miles, then a one degree deviation would be 69.17 miles, 360 degrees making up a whole circle, or globe.

Every experiment shown on youtube and elsewhere, that I have seen, states that there are numerous degrees of “drop” within a much smaller distance. The ratio is 1 degree to every 69.17 miles. For every 69.17 miles you travel there is only a one degree deviation, or drop.

Can you see a one degree deviation at almost 70 miles?

My observation is that, at 70 miles the drop would be one degree. One degree divided by 360 degrees produces a ratio of 0.00278 to one. So if a ship is 200 feet tall only 0.00278 of it should disappear: 0.556 feet, at 69.71 miles.

A building of 500 feet, at a full 69.71 miles out, such as one used in one of many observations, should drop out of sight by only 0.00278 X 500 or about 1.389 feet.

When many explain that such and such a thing on the horizon drops due to curvature, they use a ratio from nowhere.

In the following youtube video:

the producer claims much of a wind turbine 29 nautical miles from shore has been lost from sight, as he presents, almost half of its height. I am astonished at how anti-mathematical this producer is. He claims he is looking at a wind turbine that is 29 nautical miles from the beach on which he stands. 29 nautical miles converts to 33.35 miles. At 33.35 miles the curvature of the earth would be less than one half of one degree: 33.35/69.17, or .482 degrees.

Even if the windmill is as tall as he claims it could be, 180 meters, or 590.4 feet, at less than one half of one percent of drop, the windmill should only disappear 590 feet X 0.00278 feet per 69.17 mile distance, X .482 + .7864 feet. This is about 9 inches.

We see a lot more distortion than a mere drop, over 33.35 miles,

It is impossible that a distance of 33.15 miles produces such a drastic drop in elevation. Clearly there is a different variable involved.

If we were to triangulate and look at a ship moving away from a point would we se the tilt of the mast way from the beach location, for example, due to curvature? Incidentally, I have never seen a study or experiment that tests this.

If I were to stand 33.35 miles away from the point on the beach in a line perpendicular to the line of sight of the original position, would I be able to see the mast tilt away from the beach? The distance I would be making my observation would be much more, but only due to angle of observation. Would I now see less than .482 of a degree of tilt from well over 33.35 miles? The hypotenuse would be 1.414 times the distance from the original beach point or 47.16 miles. How could one tell with the tossing of waves and ship?

If I could see that far I would only be looking for a 33.35/69.71 ratio of one degree of dip, or tilt of the mast. It is imperceptible. Furthermore, the angle is less due to the angle away from direct observation, which would be directly to the side of the windmill.

In the producer’s example he shows the windmill clearly losing half its height. Impossible.

FACEBOOK, JR EMISTON AND MY REPLY, DECEMBER 1 2021

JR Emiston:

I never call flat earthers conspiracy theorists. At best, I call them ill-informed. Many, not all, misunderstand scientific terms, such as ‘theory.’ Many, not all, are also guilty of poor English, which diminishes their (already severely limited) credibility

My Reply:

Does JR mean poor grammar? It appears JR has less of an understanding of communication than he would have others believe. Theory is not a term, rather a word. I could just as easily write that globers have no understanding of some scientific terms, as does JR, but JR totally missed the whole picture. Science is not just a few words, and theory is not scientific in the least. The whole picture is referred to as scientific methodology, and theory is only a beginning, wondering upon observation of change. Theory leads to hypothesis which is then proved or disproved by the whole process of isolating a variable, measuring before and after, setting up test and experimental conditions, collating, and interpreting data. Theory is totally void of data. Furthermore, when someone uses the term conspiracy theory, besides being clear they do not know what it is, they admit they have nothing except insult and a poor, worn-out cliché, a brazen attempt to distract from lack of data, measurements, the whole scientific process. It is an attempt to make ignorant believers of others. It is wrong, immoral, dishonest, and self-destructive. Those who “create” data by lying and insulting with name-calling, such as conspiracy theorist, are liars, not to be believed, trusted, or given a shred of credibility. Conspiracy theory name-calling is very much like crying wolf. It leaves the cryer vulnerable by his ir her own misguided, self-serving fabrications. Cry wolf 3 times and when a real wolf attacks, nobody helps. This simple postulate applies in everything. so when I am called a conspiracy theorist, I realize I am being assailed by a conspiracy theory theorist, that is totally ignorant of almost everything. And JR, basically called flat earth believers, conspiracy theorists. There is only one “side” of politics that runs away from a fight with the term “conspiracy theory”. Sad to be part of a losing “theory” that cannot present decent, honest arguments. I could not live as such a sub-human. I adjust when faced with reality. After all, isn’t the survival of the “fittest” idea, in reality, survival of those who adapt to change? I did believe the earth was a globe. Not sure now, especially since the biggest argument is to use distraction and insult, calling plane earth believers conspiracy theorists.