PART 6. DERANGED ELIZABETH GRANT, SATAN SALAZAR, AND THE SLC BOARD OF DE-EDUCATION.

HAPPENING EVERYWHERE.

PART 6. DERANGED ELIZABETH GRANT, SATAN SALAZAR, AND THE SLC BOARD OF DE-EDUCATION.

Wow, so much information and so many ways to communicate.

READ!

Equity, Critical Race Theory, all the new age crap this school board teaches is de-educating your children.

Equity is racism, and goofy lizzy admits she is a proponent. Equity is big and destructive to the soul.

There is quite a process getting poison into your children’s food and you should know how it is done to avoid it. Will your read and learn?

Equity is bigger, worse, and poisoning your children. It poisons your children’s minds to accept authoritarian lies about poison in food, among other things. You are already at this point. Soy, sugar, mercury, sulfur, fluoride are all toxic.

Like learning how poisons are in your children’s foods you need to learn how equity is poison.

Equity goes all the way back to the beginnings of antifa in the “Russian Revolution”.

Yes, Russian Revolution is in quotes because it was not a revolution as we know. It was a takeover by a minority that slaughtered centuries old enemies of khazaria, Russians. But, read my other articles for more.

Get off your asses and start reading.

The material for this attack on lizzy and the demented board of de-education just flows. Everything I write flows easily, not always perfectly coherent without editing, but I believe I get my points presented in a readable and understandable manner. I say this because I discovered much more to relate than I anticipated when I discovered the SLC board of de-education rot.

When I get scores of threats that include claims my commentaries are incoherent and that I ramble (I do…so what?), or that I make no sense at all, then I know I am hitting nerves.

Anyway, blah blah, blah.

If liar loser lizzy is a good translator of research why does she not translate good? Does she translate good information or bad? It seems neither liar lizzy nor satan salazar care. Neither made mention of any research dizzy translated: either good or bad information.

Oh, yes, I am going to thrash her and salazar, bizarro forever. Posters are next.

Get your children out of the clutches of these vampires, liars, agents of teaching destructive theory.

Just a thought: Maslow’s theory of hierarchical needs: taught every day as reality?

Theory of relativity, taught every day as reality?

Theory of ego, id and alter-ego, taught every day as reality?

Critical race theory: THEORY, taught every minute if every day?

Math is reality, biology, physics, reading are all hard sciences and reality. CRT is theory. Why is it given so much more time than realities?

CRT is the ultimate bolshevik flip-flop of reality for fantasy, submission for freedom, guilt for innocence, and vice versa.

We have no idea if she translates good research into good policies or research of bad information into bad policies, or good research into bad policies, or vice versa. Do you see the distraction and deflection?

What research? Whose research? Obviously nothing worth mention.

I, myself, have in a good way, turned research into policy. I found a site that explained how to pick locks and break into homes.

If I were applying for a job in home security would you want to know what I have studied, learned and applied.

What is lizzy applying?

All we know of dizzy is equity. No mention of physics, reading, study, or anything tangible. The only real identifying value or principle, or dogma or indoctrination we have given to us is the big destruction of “equity”.

Equity is evil, it is suppression, oppression, stifling, manipulation, coercion, silencing, berating, bashing, bullying and totally destructive to your child’s soul.

Are you insane?

What research does loser lizzy turn into policy? Did she find it on the internet? Was it a goofle search (yes, goofle- I hate those guys, won’t communicate the name).

Did lizzy find detrimental research and do a good job turning it into destruction? Equity is destruction, part of CRT, part of tyrannical misinformation and manipulation.

Do you not want to know what she has learned and how she will apply it to force of ruler/teacher law upon your children?

If they are lying by deflecting and distracting, they are lying to damage you and yours.

Knock knock!

Yes?

Hi, I am your neighborhood vampire and I am a board of education policy advisor, and I have an impressive work history.

Oh, very good, come in.

Bad move, even if only a fairy tale anecdote.

You do realize that vampires cannot enter a home until invited? Then you are dinner.

You do realize that it is you who has invited de-education, change-agents, mental/emotional vampires, into your children’s minds?

The results of institutionalized programming are horrific, but you could not possibly know because the meaning of learning has been blurred.

It is like comparing smart dogs to smarter dogs. Do any talk, count?

Your children have already lost and the parameters are yours, forced upon you for your whole life.

Your first clue is your anxiety for, or fear or hatred of the words and terms I use in these commentaries.You can check this so easily yourself. Compare equity and equality before the law, for example.

Consider I.Q. tests, Intelligence Quotients. Who says?

Why are your children graded for intelligence by ninnies of low intelligence, and then your children are told what role in a constrained society they should play?

Wait, some are told they should be doctors, agents of pharmakaia (sorcery), so that’s good, right. How many are pegged thusly?

All five of my parents’ children were told they should be doctors or teachers. WOW! My parents did not fall for that garbage.

Who established the quotients, you?

PART 3. WHO IS ELIZABETH GRANT? PLANNED CHAOS AND DIVISION IN CLASSROOMS.

What do educators do with our children for 12 years less 100 hours to learn to read?

If a child can read a child can learn math, physics, history, everything.

Group think, drone-ism and many other “isms” are taught through group think submersion. Our Children are being classically conditioned to many sub-intelligent, sub-human, self-destructive behaviors.

Everybody is missing the forest for the trees. Everything is group pressure from the top, and created from the top within the group. Favoring one part of the group, the class, by disfavoring another, whites, in particular, is not only divisive, it is chaotic, as planned within the classroom: the group.

In my opinion real learning is not seen.

Two things of unseen, real learning: group, confined, isolated from real world experiences, group-think oppression, is the big teaching success, not reading, not math, not science.

Second: the few minutes at home with instruction by parents, a child directed to learn, is real learning, also not seen.

We are conditioned to see what is not real and vice versa.

In spite of hours of group think instruction in the classroom, children do NOT learn reading, math, science, language. Learning is done by the learner, and more at home out of the group think room.

You do not see it, because your attention is directed at the group-think facility.

You are the major facilitator of the only one who learns, the learner, while the change agent manipulates your child’s mind, principles into dogma and voluntary exploitation.

You are the more successful teacher of the one who learns, the learner, your child.

But, I am telling you group-think is bigger and more detrimental to the individual, your child, than you think.

Communism is not voluntary participation in community. Communism is forced grouping and submission. Schooling in the classroom is submersion in group submission.

Teachers are not teachers. They are placers. They place information before children, in a group-think submission confinement and children learn by participation, submission, and group.

I cannot learn you. Again, teachers are placers. They primarily place group-think submission while learners learn best at home and out of the classroom.

Learning at home is learning. Again the best teacher does not teach. Learning is internal, not external.

The main topic, the main subject, the main and primary focus in institutionalized programming systems is GROUP. It is not noticed because the small parts are the focus of the media. It is taught without question every second of every day a child is subjected to classroom group-think chaos. It is mind-numbing by design, and agents of this assault on children are teachers and administrators.

Group is imposed. “Group” is the lesson being taught. Group control from authority is socialist tyranny, is what children are being programmed to live. They are not taught, they are programmed.

You see, I can use different words to describe what happens to our children. Who is to say I am not correct or more accurate than what you think?

You cannot successfully express your opinion in opposition to mine until you have read and studied. What will you tell me that I have not heard? My opinions developed because I feasted on information from all sides and reject what you have accepted. Let us compare,

I do not care if you are fair to me. You have nothing to convince me of anything anyway. I write this for you. I know your opinions are emotionally motivated, and ignorant because I know you respond immediately to my new information and discussion; my newly formed opinions and interpretations, and you have not had time to investigate. So, your opinions, if you have not done the hundreds, thousands of hours of study as I have done, are nothing to me. Hence, your unfair treatment of my ideas and principles, is nothing to me either. But you should worry for you and yours.

Until you step out of that level of ignorance and learn a few words and analyze both sides of this, your opinion counts for nothing, for you.

Now don’t think I am boasting, or egoist. I am simply stating I have done a lot of research into this over the years and can see through the lies and fake superiority, and I invite you to free yourself, as I did, from the deception of distraction, sophistry, deflection, and self-adoration of fake superiors.

I am making this an issue. I have made this an issue for decades.

Salazar begins to reveal the agenda very quickly in his fairy tale when he states, “She was instrumental in shaping public education policy while serving as a chief of staff and senior policy advisor within the Office of Elementary and Secondary Education at the U.S. Department of Education…”.

Shaping? Shaping can be a number of different things. Taking a blob of clay and forming it into a bowl is shaping. Taking a sledge hammer and bashing the bowl to a mound of rubble is also shaping.

Chaotic division in a classroom group is also shaping.

Salazar said nothing about what she shaped and how, so how do we know she is a good shaper or a shaper of good?

If they deflect, they hide.

When people write or speak in headline statements but give no  details, you must wonder about the person’s honesty and the veracity of the claims.

For actual safety reasons you must question this appointee and who actually did it.

I am certain salazar is lying when he claims a stakeholder committee of 40 people “evaluated” her.

How many others were evaluated? Who was on the committee? Tell us their names. Who?

When salazar writes that “…she shapes…”, it means absolutely nothing except that salazar is hiding something from YOU.

I would not trust this grant woman as far as I could kick her lying luciferian ass, or salazar’s.

You might think I am jumping to conclusions, but no. I read the article.

From your perspective, if you have not read the article, you have no place except ignorance in believing I am wrong.

So, it is on you to read and educate yourself. Look for the details. None? Who was on the stakeholder committee, fellow vampires, facilitators of child abuse, parents with children in school?

For all we know the committee was a committee of only dementocrats who believe in big brother government controlling everything in your life, to take everything in your life. Maybe the committee was made up of only biased haters of whites. Who was on the so-called committee? Why the deception?

What is a stakeholder committee? Who did the stakeholders appoint to the committee?

Read the different adjectives and adverbs I use to describe the same things they promulgate, and read my comments of salazar’s and grant’s words, and then go read their words for yourself. You will be reading from my perspective which I claim is, and should be, yours. Then discern for yourself if my interpretation is correct.

If you read the short report with conditioned acceptance, as most people do, you will find it a nice story about her success, with no proof that her so-alled success will benefit your children.

But read the article and ask what and why of everything.

She worked in the department of Education? WOW! And you accept that working for government has inherent credibility? You accept that without thinking or wondering?

That is very bad, for you and yours.

Salazar would have you believe that just being in a place is good. She worked? And that’s it, that’s all?

What work did she do?

It is centralized, de-education that is leaving our children dumb.

Not telling us what makes lizzy grant a good shaper or educator, or programming administrator, or corralling facility manager, makes salazar a liar.

Why is he lying?

Do you like being deceived?

Do your friends and loved ones lie to you?

Of those who lie to you constantly how many of them do you consider to be friend or ally?

Do you not see how grossly deceptive this is, and wonder why?

What the hell about this bolshevik/banker whore, grant are they keeping from you, and why? What plans, programming, institutionalized grouping do they have planned for your children?

Again, why was this bolshevik/banker whore grant hired?

But it gets worse.

What did she do at the U.S. Department of Education? Did she shape, and how. How she shaped, is the issue!

How she shaped and molded and instilled chaos is the issue, not that she worked. What a disgusting fraud laid before you and expected to be accepted without question. Are you really that stupid?

Did she manage? What and how she managed is the issue!

Did she administer, systematize?

She was, however, a “Senior Policy Advisor”. WOW! That clarifies everything.

Is she a senior? Was her policy advising for seniors? How does one become a senior advisor? Somebody sets money aside to pay for such a hypocrisy, for expressing words that deflect and distract. Is that it?

Do you see how liars and fabricators, those who deflect and distract you from truth and reality; do you see how they use title, names, cool words to give themselves adoration and fake credibility?

Again, if she is a good policy advisor, why is she not advising good? And, again, no mention either way.

We do not know if she was a bad policy advisor, but we also don’t know she was good, or an advisor of good policy. Who decides what is bad and what is good, people who don’t care about your children like you do? Who decides what is bad and good for your children, people who care more for titles, capital letters, and money, or you?

YAHOO”NEWS”, FEBRUARY 1 2023, RHETORIC REGARDING DESANTIS ‘HOSTILE TAKEOVER’ OF LIBERAL SCHOOL.

Where do these propaganda mills find these useful idiot ‘writers’? How can so many people in this country be so damned dishonest?

These are idiot ‘writers’, Stephanie Saul, Patricia Mazzei and Trip Gabriel.

Look at the yapoop’NEWS’ headline on yapoop page, “DeSantis executes “hostile takeover” of liberal college”.

Why is hostile takeover in quotation marks? Is it because it is not a hostile takeover?

Define hostile takeover. Can these lying libs identify what DeSantis did to make his governing a hostile takeover?

Why does it take three to fabricate these lies? Is it like a group hired to write comedy routines?

What do these dem/lib goons write?

The heading on the yapoop page reads, “As he plots….”.

Plots? Do these dimwitted broads mean, plans, negotiates, works, governs? Would these bolshevik/banker media whores write that jophus bidenski, Ukrainian fascist agent, or laughing hyena kamala plot?

Reporting would normally be reporting unbiased NEWS. Why do these mentally diminished agents try to manipulate you with bias, adding adverbs and adjectives to judge and propagate their ignorant deductions?

How did bidenski and kamala not plot to cheat to steal the election?

Oh, still hung-up on that reality? Is it because there was no proof, except for 300 individuals filing sworn statements witnessing cheating?

Just because international, bolshevik/banker media (dem/libs) did not report any of this, does not mean it did not happen. Drop-box video shows scores, if not hundreds of individuals dropping off numerous ballots at a time, and innumerable times. How did a shut-in with no mind and a giggling moron win anything? Did they plot their ‘win’?

These dimwitted bolshevik/banker whores stated DeSantis was positioning himself? How do they know? Is that speculation? Is that rhetorical speculation?

Do these sub-intelligent comedy writers mention that DeSantis is a culture warrior fighting other culture warriors? No?

Notice, please, in bold lettering the sub-headline at the bottom, in quotation marks. Yes, a statement in actual quotation marks reveals that these dimwitted ‘writers’ might just know what actual reporting is. Do not hold your breath, however. 

To the article, now. The article carries a reference to The New York Times and the headline reads, “DeSantis Takes On the Education Establishment, and Builds His Brand”.

I could comment on the caption regarding the photo, the photo itself being manipulative and deceptive. I could comment on every little aspect of this article, but I ask you to accept that everything in the article is deceptive and dishonest in one way or another.

Let me simply point out a few of the major lies, rhetoric.

The article reads, “…vowing to take on liberal orthodoxy…”

Orthodox means conforming to established doctrine. What doctrines is DeSantis taking on?

What orthodoxy exists in liberaldom that remains steadfast, conservative and immovable? Nothing!

Liberalism never ceases to manipulate and change, so the claim that DeSantis is taking on something established and consistent by challenging a new school and education in general, is a lie.

Liberal orthodoxy, in and of itself, is an oxymoron. Liberals challenge status quo while orthodoxy is the status quo. How is DeSantis taking on status quo that breaks status quo?

How is it possible that anyone takes on conservative liberalism? It does not exist.

Did the goon writers ask, what evils did the school plot to institute?

Irrefutably the school plotted according to unpublished goals and programs that most schools are trying to implement and hide. These school goals and attacks on orthodoxy may not be published but they are written and implemented.

One paragraph tells us much.

But his crusade has perhaps played out most dramatically in classrooms and on university campuses. He has banned instruction about gender identity and sexual orientation in kindergarten through third grade; limited what schools and employers can teach about racism and other aspects of history; and rejected math textbooks en masse for what the state called “indoctrination.” Most recently, he banned the College Board’s Advanced Placement courses in African American studies for high school students.”

Why use the word crusade? Why not use something correct, such as representative or protecting?

Why do these media sluts clump universities with children’s classrooms when the majority of State sanctions are protecting children from sexual tampering by schools boards that do not represent the VAST majority of parental wishes for their own children? Why do these whores lie and hide their plans, plots?

Why do these whores reinforce sexual manipulation of children? Why do these whores support school boards commandeering control of children, stealing them from parents by classically conditioning them to live like instinctual animals?

What filth do school boards put in children’s minds that gives school boards and hence, dem/lib, bolshevik/banker governments, control over children now and for their whole lives?

Why do these whores, and the whole dementocrat party, insist on grooming children?

Why can these media sluts not let children be children? Why do these media whores believe sexual orientation is important for children who are not yet capable of understanding, feeling or knowing about sex?

Would these filthy whores also want children to experience sex before their capacity and, AND physiological maturity, or are children groomed for teachers’ and administrators’ pleasures only?

Why do these whores and all dem/lib deceptions pretend that teaching racism in the schools is not racism? Critical Race Theory is racism. It elevates one race above another by moving one race below others.

Racism, as taught in the schools, elevates many races above others. Racism taught in untethered indoctrination programs denigrates. If this were being done to American blacks, it would be considered racism. It is being done to American whites, therefore that act defines it as racism.

Critical Race Theory is a theory and deserves about 10 minutes of instruction, per year, about as much as other theories receive: maybe one class only and a question on a test, along with questions of other theories.

How much time is given in psychology classes to Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs?

Does Maslow’s Theory deserve to be taught as absolute reality? Is Maslow’s theory given a diagram and a page of mention in a psychology book of perhaps hundreds of pages? Yes, and not much more.

Is Maslow’s theory rammed down the throats of students and are they graded on their applications of any theory, as is critical race theory?

Why are these whores so supportive of CRT when it is so violent, offensive and oppressive?

What is a school? Is a school an institution of learning or forced behavior?

Why are these media whores so hell bent on controlling children and abusing them with things they cannot understand?

Would these media sluts, stephanie, patricia and trip advocate that children in kindergarten to 3rd grade learn and participate in flight school? It is quite possible that children could learn to fly at these very young ages much more successfully than getting involved in sexual education and activities, but the point is children are taught things according to their capacity to learn and participate, and not according to the biased, self-serving, pleasures of administrators and teachers.

How bloody vicious and cruel can these media whores and their puppet masters get towards others’ children?

Notice these media sluts do not state why math books were removed? Are math books teaching math or sexual indoctrination? Yes, they use sexual themes for examples where they are totally inappropriate?

Are math teachers teaching math or are they classically conditioning sexual dependency and deviance?

Is institutionalized control of sex another form of creating dependency in slaves?

If my child were a student at one of these schools where hateful racism is taught, and where teachers have adorned themselves with power to manipulate and groom children; if my child at any age were taught sexual deviance as transgender bs is, I would ambush the teacher that violated my child, and beat the hell out of him/her/it.

I would have the child that was violated watch.

However, as I have stated, I do not drive as close to the edge as I can, in anything. I do not put my children in contact with blood sucking, sexual deviance instruction by evil school boards. I would never send my children to get close to risking their sanity, freedoms and individuality in the public school de-education systems.

Somehow, and I know how, school boards have been infiltrated by evil agents of manipulation and control.

School boards that advocate these evil programs and instruction have been bought. They have all been bribed and blackmailed after bribery.

This de-education ideology is evil. Why put your children at risk?

If I had a child in public education and these three sluts, the three witches of east-bitch, came to a school board meeting, I would beat them soundly.

These media whores, steph, slat and twit, are sick, sub-human scum and should be totally shunned and fined, not paid, for lying to you!

Do your friends lie to you? Do you consider people who lie to you to be friends? These bitches lied to you.

Remember, school boards do not violate your children, ‘people’ do.

This is my legal, conditional threat. Anyone who touches my child inappropriately or tampers with my child’s innocence, will be beaten until he/she/it cannot teach and violate another child.

This is the conditional threat all parents should make to ‘people’, the sexual and racist vampires of their respective school boards.

Remember this also, rights are not lost. They are taken or transferred. If you lose the right to determine your child’s education, someone else has stolen it from you. You become a classically conditioned putz and coward when you lobby vampires to stop bleeding your children.

And so, I expose to your some of the lies of these three media whores, lies of The New York Times, and lies of yapoop”NEWS”. I remind you that everything corrupt, lying, bolshevik/banker liberal media reports is lie after lie, and so it is with steph’s, slat’s and twit’s “report”.

Please, liberate yourself from ignorance. Go to the sources and learn the truth in all things. Read, understand and accept truth for truth itself.

READ! Read your Bill of Rights. Read the Constitution of your representative republic and accept that democracy is not representation. Their democracy is theirs and theirs alone. We, all Americans outside of their dry-dock district of democracy (D.C.), are excluded from representation. Our republican representative nation is subjected to rule by a foreign, occupying force of illegal law, that pretends to represent we, the people.

You, everyone outside of their self-serving democracy in the District of Columbia; you are republican whether you like it or not, and your fealty is conditioned. Read “The Federalist Papers”.

CRITICAL RACE THEORY: ONE THEORY COMPARED WITH OTHER THEORIES, AND GIVEN A FAIR SHARE OF INSTRUCTION AS OTHER THEORIES.

Bill Maher, moments of cognizance.

Surely he will argue that point. Call it my opinion. I have heard Bill Maher lie and lie.

However, today I write, report, that Bill Maher, a proponent of the left-wing bolshevik rhetoric, not necessarily true, made some keen observations one would not expect from dem/lib movements, particularly, the dumbing down of Americans through a dissembled, subjugated de-education system.

Bill Maher referred to and played a ticktock video clip of questions asked of Americans. “What is the biggest city in the world?”, is one such question.

The answers were, Asia, Europe, Brazil, and others, maybe some actually citing a city.

Maher’s words following are an expose that even the bolshevik-left realizes their dismantling and destruction of real education is a reality.

Maher states: “…so you tell me, if a country is only as strong as its people what can the future possibly hold for a population this moronic, being a full grown adult and thinking a human could walk on the sun? Or that the biggest city in the world as Asia. This country simply has no education standards anymore. They will let you out of a public high school and give you a diploma and you don’t actually have to know anything, which used to be the mission of schools, knowing things.”

Maher was referring to Critical Race Theory, as opposed to actual education of “…knowing things”, and he continued that our children do not know anything.

Controlling ignorant populations is always a construct of left-wing, boshevik/dementocrat tyranny, and Maher has noticed.

I have a number of simple questions, for many issues, that left-wing dementocrat, bolshevik drones constantly refuse to answer, address, or even allow to be discussed.  Hence we see ruling, un-representative governing bodies, such as education boards, having parents removed from the lives of their own children.

Why is a theory taught in schools as if it were the ultimate issue, the only theory and irrefutable truth? Why is Critical Race Theory taught, imposed, lived, and forced upon our children when it is only a theory? What opposing, or related theories should have equal representation and time as CRT?

I have been investigating heliocentric (globe) theory versus flat, plane(t) earth for a number of years now. I have been kicked off Facebook numerous times, suspended, for arguing, fighting, delivering the same tone and vocabulary as those with whom I fight, while they are not suspended.

I have a question that seems to draw the ire of all heliocentric model believers: If the earth is a globe, why do photos show a flat horizon at any shore of a large body of water?

To explain this in geometric terms, if one claims he or she can see a curve looking out to sea, as a ship, for example, moving away from shore, appears to roll over the curve of the earth and “sink” why is this same curve not seen looking across that same view, in fact, where the distance is greater?

If we, mankind, has been into space, why are there no photos of earth from space?

You might well argue that there are. Might I point out that there are CGIs, models, composites, drawings, art and much related but not one single photo.

In fact, the dearth of photos of earth from space is starkly accentuated when we consider the latest jaunt into “space” by bozo-bezos an William Shatner.

Do not forget that Shatner is an actor, and acts unreal situations.

In tha fall of 2021, Bozo-bezos and Shatner took a rocket flight into “space”.

Apparently the whole event lasted 11 minutes, and the report is that the, “The rocket launched from Blue Origin’s private facility in West Texas, reaching above 100 kilometers (or more than 340,000 feet altitude) before returning to Earth safely a few minutes later.”

How did it return? Was it in space? Did it actually go into “space”, and turn around and come back?

How does propulsion push against something that isn’t there, the void of “space”, to change direction so it can return?

That is just the beginning of questions regarding a fake flight into “space”, or a flight into fake space.

Two minutes, with all the new technology of today, is all they could manage?

How many seconds of weightlessness did they experience? Weightlessness can be experienced in a jet at any altitude. We call it falling. The same effect can be felt when an elevator drops.

Why no photos?

With all the new technology, advances in rocketry, and apparent photos of earth in 1969, why could these goons not take one photo of earth from space, even with a fish-eye lens? Did they not actually go into “space”?

These are just questions from my immediate thoughts, drawn from recent internet “discussions”, I wonder about these theories. I am certain I will be adding to this list of queries.

Do not forget that the heliocentric model is a theory and at best a model. With perfect lack of photos of earth from “space”, one must remember that the globe earth is a theory and only a theory,

Do not forget that the plane(t) earth as a flat, straight plane is also a theory but not taught or given a 1% effort as the theory of earth as a globe;

Critical race as a theory is given so much time and instruction it is more than a subject in. School. It has actually been instituted as societal fabric: a part of reality that is only theory.

One should be astounded at how recent and oppressive CRT is; how CRT is so recently instituted and augmented, as compared with other theories.: theories that are so ignored they are not even mentioned.

There are in existence theories in opposition to CRTtheory but CR theory has not been questioned in the least. Not even questioned is the reality that CR theory is only theory and opinion.

How about we teach the Bill of Rights and discourses by Thomas Jefferson, Abraham Lincoln, George Washington, all who opined their theories, that proved to be much more than theory? What theories could these possibly be, you ask. Have you read your history? From where does the Bill of Rights originate? What?

The Bill of Rights, you say, is not a theory that challenges CR theory. How would you know if you have not studied, looked, maybe read one page from the public notices that contributed to the Bill of Rights?

Public notices, you ask? The Federalist Papers is a collection of letters written to colonials at the time of the War of Independence, published throughout the colonies. Public discourse, as opposed to demented CR theory hiding from parents’ purview, was popular in those years: very PUBLIC, theorized and discussed at the founding of America.

Read and see for yourselves if the individual rights, described as coming from god, challenge CR theory.

To be fair to all theories, how about the de-eduction system spend a few moments every day teaching possible challenges to CR theory? How about an equal dispensation of time for each theory be allotted asa balanced curriculum? Who wants an imbalanced curriculum?

Would it be possible to return to a class of basic civics and critical ice theory be given a proper place, a theory with as much given it as other theories? Wait, what a basic civics class?

Do you realize students in America were taught basic civics? What happened, where did civics lessons go? The deranged bolshevik dementocrats eliminated civil, and math, and geometry, and biology, and health.

Did you not know this? When the demented education boards teach that 2 plus 2 can equal five, you must realize math is gone.

Please, take note that I purposely identify and accentuate that this CRT is identified by the authors themselves as theory. Being a theory it deserves much much less attention than things such as, why can people not walk on the sun and what are the big cities of the world?