CRITIQUE OF CHRISTOPHER WILSON’S YAHOO”NEWS” COMMENTARY OF APRIL 21st, 2020, “Who is behind the coronavirus social distancing protests?”

CRITIQUE OF CHRISTOPHER WILSON’S YAHOO”NEWS” COMMENTARY OF APRIL  21st, 2020, “Who is behind the coronavirus social distancing protests?”

Wilson should be referred to as senior fabricator.

I read Wilson’s article and wondered where the connection to his headline claim can be found. Wilson tries a number of tricks to deflect and distract from the fraud of the headline.

Like I always say/write: if it attacks the innocent like a bolshevik, if it attacks the middle class like a bolshevik, if it attacks truth like a bolshevik, it is a bolshevik. In this case, “it” is Wilson.

Tricks to make you, dear reader, think there is some kind of connection, are meant to manipulate you, yourself. Are you angry that someone is trying to organize and get conservatives to protest? Who says the organizer or protestors are conservatives? Why does this affect you? Is it because We, the People have a right to protest? Is “someone
“ Trying to attach a negative or offensive emotion to a headline claim?  Are you that easily manipulated?

Are you upset because someone is organizing rights to protest? Maybe it is because you think there is something inherently wrong that someone behind the scenes misdoing something morally reprehensible? Have you studied the words of the article to find why it is morally reprehensible? Is your anger due to your false perception of why people are protesting?

Two things to consider, fellow American supporter of democrat party and liberalism: Do you know what conservative is and do you think those who lie to you do so for your benefit?

What is a conservative? Typically a conservative supports small government. How much of your tax dollar do you think is used for We, the People? The bigger government gets the greater the loss due to corruption, inefficiency and nepotism. Not a single government person produces a thing. How many managers do you think a company with no production can support? Big government is a managing monopoly, monopolizing force of law, raw power against, you. Government that grows by creating more managers does so for itself: for the corrupt people that want to perpetuate their power and profit. When you witness growth of a government by the government itself, you witness self-serving protectionism.

Conservatives also support conserving the balanced middle, that is, Constitutional Republic.

Wait. You did not know, or do not believe that a Constitutional Republic is the balanced middle? Who has been lying to you all these years that America is a democracy?

Look for yourself. Find a democracy, just one; search the whole world, all of history, and find a democracy that has a Bill of Rights for the individual. Conservatives conserve those rights. Not that important, you think. Why would you think that unless you have been trained to think it?

Regarding these unimportant rights, pick one. Pick two, three.

Pick the right you will give up tomorrow. Find a non-conservative who supports conserving your rights, that one you just gave away.

You would be okay with loss of freedom to speak, correct? You have allowed democrats and liberals to speak for you, lying about the Constitutional Republic system of self-governance. Self-governance? Is that also a new term for you? Who speaks of self governance, democrats or conservatives?

When you surrendered truth to a system of top-down rule, as opposed to self-governance, and you allowed that entity or person to speak lies about truth, to you, you gave up your freedom of speech long ago.

You can only expect what follows the lies, that affect you. They will surely affect you because they are directed at you, and you had better not disagree or you will be called that nasty word, conservative.

Wilson is lying, for you and to you.

So, again. What rights are you willing to surrender, and to whom? Such a good example, because it is quite physical; actually they are all good examples because they are all physical and easy to visualize.

Surrender your right to love freely. How do you get to work? Will you be required to apply for a pass to work in this location or that? How many contractors, sub-contractors, truck drivers, delivery personnel will be required to beg permission, or apply? What if you are stopped without a pass? Are you going to enjoy jail? Will your attorney need to apply for a pass to see you before you are read your miranda rights? Oops, forgot. You don’t have any.

Why does Wilson try to make you believe, in ignorance, that constative is bad? Is Wilson an agent of non-conservative, or is he also willing to surrender his rights? Maybe, like most democrats and liberals, he thinks the law will not apply to him because he has served those who take your rights. Maybe he thinks he will be given a carte blanche pass because he lied to you, I mean wrote an article without verification or backing of claims,

So, to dissect Wilson’s fraud, I mean propaganda, I mean story, in the first paragraph he tosses three rights at you that have negative connotations? I wonder, if your home is being invaded and your neighbor has a gun, and you don’t, how long will I take police to send aid? If police are so busy taking applications for freedom of moverment; permission to move, when do you think an officer might have tome to get to you?

We do not have to “enjoy” that application of benefits from democrat liberal seizure of your rights. We already know that, without politicization, by the time the police arrive, you are already victimized, whether that means you are dead or robbed.

What if, however, you decide to call your neighbor because you know he understands the second amendment, has a firearm, and likes you and yours, and would come to your aid, in seconds. What if your neighbor is a “crazy”, gun-toting, conservative, who knows he does not have a right to freedom of movement about the country? If he comes to your aid, and the police arrive and check his “papers”, he could go to jail. You are on your own brother. The reality, and the purpose of politicizing everything to democrat rule, it would be worse with the loss of your rights and the requirement for papers and permission.

Is there a problem with being white? Is Wilson trying to get you to think there is something wrong with being white? Are you white? How does it feel to be presumed “guilty”?

Oh, you did not know that a conservative is committed to preserving, conserving your rights, and everyone’s right to face his or her accuser, and be presumed innocent? Sorry, that’s not you, anymore, because you believe liars such as Wilson. He tricked you three times in the first paragraph.

The protests are not only “against” social distancing orders. Protests were primarily against lock-down dictates. People need to eat and no government knows what We, the People want. Why did Wilson tell that lie? We had a protest right here in Salt Lake city, April 20th, 2020. It was a protest to get Governor Stalin-Herbert to lift the cower-at-home, I mean snivel-at-home, I mean shelter-at-home orders: dictates.

People are dying by these orders but neither Wilson nor Stalin-herbert care for that truth or reality. Wilson is concerned for the color of the skin of people at these rallies, and if they are exercising their rights to carry firearms. Wilson is probably lying about that anyway. Are you afraid to go to “conservative” protests against heavy-handed cower-at-home, I mean starve-at-home orders, because there might be people with firearms? I bet there was not a single person with a firearm at any rally, but Wilson needs you afraid so his lies seem more credible.

This is just the way of liars, propaganda agents, Wilson being one of the least effective.

You see, Wilson already has you afraid, of untruths. Wilson can now tell you anything and you will believe even though he has not provided sa single reference, truth, picture, or connection to his claims.

This is political science in its most disgusting application, democrats and liberals. Conservatives do not need to lie. Am I lying? I told you the founding fathers designed a balance between left and right. Do you know what is on the scale of left and right? Who told you it was democrat, left and republican, right? Whoever told you that is a liar, but that is accepted for decades now, because of the continual lies of one side, not the other. You see, one side is on a side while the other  “side” is, absolutely is the balanced middle: balanced between tyranny or totalitarianism on the left and anarchy on the right.

Don’t believe me, please. Go read  and learn for yourself, or trust Wilson.

Read The Federalist Papers. Loo at the introductions to the founding documents. Do they read the “democracy” of the United States or do they read, “The Constitution Of The Republic Of The United States”?

Wilson’s second paragraph is a mess, a meaningless twist of conditionals and oxymorons. He claims, “ Although…”.

Do I need to explain “although”? “Although” is a word used to inject an opposition and condition. Wilson begins this paragraph with “although”, a conditional, then makes another conditional claim, making the sentence and thus, the claim itself, doubly conditional, or highly unlikely, if not completely fraudulent. Tricks.

Although what you see and what we all see, without evidence of guns or racism, it is not real, although presumes to make the statement real.  How is that for a lie. Although I am standing outside your store, I have none of your merchandise on my person, and there is no evidence anyone has been in your store, much less broken into it, I m somehow, magically guilty because you say so? Although?

Do you see the hypocrisy and fabrication of fake reality? People wonder why conservatives, republic-oriented Americans and the President call Wilson and his “kind” of journalism fake news. It is fake, fabricated from literary tricks, rhetoric (lies) and outright hate-motivated trickery..

Wilson continues with a claim that the protestors, “…have largely been organized by conservative activists.”

What is a conservative activist? Does Wilson explain, define, describe what he is talking about? Can Wilson give us a clear understanding and an example? No? Would that be a fake claim from a fake news source? Is Wilson trying to create a fear or presumption in your mind?

Wilson’s sick and twisted tricks are just beginning. It is a pattern of manipulation.

Next trick, after [presumption, is to use authority then fake credibility, seldom credible, usually presumed credible and above the masses’ presumed sub-intelligence.

All you need to do is look at the sentence structure to realize it is a tactic to twist reality in your mind. What kind of loving father or other would do that to YOU?

Wilson, in addition to being a grammatical moron, cannot communicate propaganda very well. He being a new paragraph without a noun. The significance, in case you think this is insignificant, is that Wilson is a second rate writer, at best, failing to present reliable or credible information regarding anything. He is a loser at even the worst propaganda.

Why does Wilson write that the rallies are pushing back against social distancing when the truth is so far from what Wilson claims? Why is Wilson lying? Why do liars lie?

Here is the deep and dark secret about propaganda, misinformation and manipulation: liars lie because they believe they need to lie. Liars lie because the truth does not support their fabrications and deception.

The rallies are not political. Wilson, like all true bolsheviks (seriously), makes everything political because politics is the absolute rule by a ruling class. Wilson is part of that politicization of everything: even aspect of your life.

Politics requires that you think of the leader(s) when you eat your breakfast. Politics requires that you remember the leader (or leaders) saved you from this or that crisis. Politics requires that you forget the leader(s) made the numerous crises that reduced your rights until you had grants from the leader(s).

Wilson is involved in politicizing everything, for tyranny, the leader(s).

Wilson lies about it, naturally. He must.

So, the fifth paragraph, Wilson starts with a politicization of a protest. Wilson uses the word, “rally”. It was not a “rally”, it was a protest, like the protest my friends attended in Salt Lake City. Why does Wilson purposely use the word rally?

Rally is a word associated with conservatives and President Trump. Rally is now a conservative word, according the dem/lib propaganda. The democrats could not rally support so they decided to negate the positive effects by demeaning the word. Wilson is a part of that destruction, a bolshevik tactic, to destroy language to suit politics.

The people at the protest were protesting against republican governor. Did Wilson mention that protests by so-called republican-backed supporters were protests against republican governors? No, lying Christopher Wilson did not want that truth known because then the reality could not politicized to suit a democrat/liberal deception.

Rallies by republicans against republican governors are then, in reality, protests, not at all like Wilson propagates.

Wilson claims, “Some of the rallies are being pushed by Republican-allied groups in battleground states with Democratic governors.” Which “Republican-allied groups”? Can Wilson identify one? No, he does not even try because it is a lie, an opening to a paragraph to give his words a sense of credibility-by-emotional attachment, a fake attachment he created in the opening paragraph.One name of a real person would provide real credibility. Wilson’s goal is to deceive so he must lie, by fabrication of a scenario or connection that simply does not exist.

Maybe there is a connection. So what? Are democrats not connected to liberals and are liberal causes not backed by democrat groups? Did The DNC hire Christopher Steele, an ex- British agent, to fabricate a dossier regarding Trump? Yes, Hillary hire Fusion GPS who hired Christopher Steel to fabricate, form nothing, with the help of Steele’s Russian contacts, a hate-motivated dossier the democrat party used as pretense to illegally investigate President Trump. Was it this same dossier democrat-party supporters used to lie to the FISA courts to get warrants? So what if a political party is involved in these rallies? So what if a the republican party is involved in stopping democrat party-controlled states from roughshod over every citizen in that state, including democrat-supporting and ex-democrat supporting people? So what?

Did Wilson mention that the rallies included democrat-party supporting citizens? No. HHe is guilty of politicizing this. Politicizing means making a representative reality into a gain for the democrat party and the move left, on the scale: totalitarian government, democrats.

I could go on and on dissecting every line, every sentence and claim Wilson made. Everything he wrote in that political attack is an outright lie, or bolshevik magic to turn everything into a rally for democrat tyranny. Wilson is guilty of rallying by lying. Wilson is guilty of politicizing a simple protest by people who want to live. Wilson is guilty of attempting to turn a simple protest by people into a political event to support a political party, the democrats.

Wilson is guilty of all the things he attempts to attach to his political enemies, those for whom his democrat/liberal supporters hire him to attack.

CONSERVATIVES, EVER CRITICAL OF LYING LIBERAL MEDIA, REFUSE TO BELIEVE THE MARXIST, LIBERAL MEDIA IS NOT LYING REGARDING COVID-19

CONSERVATIVES, EVER CRITICAL OF LYING LIBERAL MEDIA, REFUSE TO BELIEVE THE MARXIST, LIBERAL MEDIA IS NOT LYING REGARDING COVID-19

A good liar deceives in depth, interspersing lies backing lies, with truths.

So-called conservative talk show hosts and hostesses, ever critical of left-wing, liberal media for fabricating propaganda and authoring fake news, still believe liberal media is somehow, magically telling the truth about covid-19.

Now they dismiss the idea that the liberal media and democrat politicians are working together, as in a conspiracy, as if somehow collectively, media and democrats are really decent people because they suddenly recognize the gravity of the issue. Do the talk show hosts and hostesses think the lying liberals and democrat anti-representatives did not recognize gravity of all the lies, the hundreds and thousands they have told over these last three years? 

I can see it now, Fredo Cuomo woke up the day he realized the covid scare was serious, and then resolved to tell the truth about the origins and realities. Would that have been the day after he dismissed warnings, along with all democrats and liberal media? When did Fredo realize the truth of this matter was more important than the politics? How can it be said that Fredo or any dem/lib has had a change of heart and soul to suddenly motivate them, maybe just Fredo, to be honest?

Is it not a curiosity to the so-called conservative hosts and hostesses that democrats and liberal media have worked together, conspired, if you please, to remove a duly elected president, but suddenly, still trying to remove a duly elected president, by actually exploiting this situation, they are reporting truthfully when the truth of it all would expose all the other lies and fabrications? 

It is more than just utterly ironic that these conservative voices, the big shots of the right, so-called, now believe the Cuomos, CNN, Associated Press, and other liberal hacks and rags, are magically honest.

Is it possible that the lies and fraud of the left, tyranny-wing extremists in the media and democrat party, go all the way back to a mysterious beginning in Wuhan province in China? Where did the crazy, unhinged liberal media decide to start telling truth? Did they start telling truth at the point where a resident of Wuhan ate a bat wing and got weirdly sick? Did it start when liberal media suddenly decided to be honest, and report that the beginning of the virus was not a science lab in Wuhan? Did all the liberal media personnel collaborate and decide to report truth? That is a hell of a conspiracy theory, that the liberal media started working together to report fact and truth, while still remaining abusive and dishonest about everything and anything regarding President Trump? How can this inconsistency survive in simple, narrow-minds? It is impossible

Perhaps the Communist Chinese authorities and media did lie? Which way did they lie? Does a liar tell the truth about a lie?

The whole world knows Chinese authorities lied. Are they lying about being honest? China is the home of Sun Tzu, author of the book, The Art of War. Do we think the Chinese communist party might pretend to hide a secret from the world, propagating a double lie, to create over something that does not exist, and the liberal media and democrat party just might go along to help force marxist/communist/bolshevik tactics into America?

Why would anyone do this dastardly deed? Come on. Do I really have to explain that a country that enslaves its own people, incarcerates millions in re-education camps, cares for honesty, integrity and the peoples of other countries? Yes, we all know you, little lily liberal are special. Don’t be dumb.

China is at war with everyone. Communists are insanely paranoid and continually work to eliminate enemies and create monopolies of power for their own security.

Would China pretend to suppress information to make it seem more valuable while releasing information they are finally disclosing a threat, an admitted mistake they may have made to twist everything to throw the United States and the world into chaotic fear? Liars lie in many ways, using as many tactics necessary and available.

I propose the democrat party, totally unrepresentative of Americans, is working with the Chinese communists to destroy America.

Democrats support and propagate an idea that socialism, communism and democracy is a better form of government. They cannot, can never show it is or how effective it is in providing benefits and freedoms, but they care little for that.

Marxists, communists, progressives, socialists, and democrats the world over want to destroy America and OUR Constitution. I ask you, if you think the Constitution is not important, what rights are you willing to surrender, give away to a political other? Are you going to surrender your right to free speech? Are you going to surrender your right to free assembly, as one would do at a work place?Are you willing to surrender your right to move about the country freely, engage in a good idea that might make you wealthy? Are you willing to surrender your right to police protection from crime?

Do you think Chinese citizens enjoy the things you are going to surrender? Do you think Chinese subjects went what you, in ignorance are allowing to be transferred to a handful of oligarchs? Do you think the rights you are going to surrender for others, will disappear for all or do you think rulers with ruthless deception in mind will allow democrat citizens to keep their rights? Do you think the new Constitution will read something like: Freedom of speech is only allowed for democrat citizens, or will it read, freedom of speech is only allowed for democrat party member? Is there a difference?

Do you realize communism, socialism does not allow the masses to have the same opportunities and benefits? Bernie Sanders speaks of socialism is Scandinavian countries, as if socialism is the rule. It is not. There are social programs but free enterprise still produces wealth, stability and GDP for every country in the world. China has free enterprise. Why when communism is so good? Communism cannot produce by force what free people willing and lovingly make.

If I wanted you afraid of me, would I lie about the number of people I had beaten? Yes.

Would I claim fewer or more? If I wanted to destroy your ability to defeat me economically, because I knew I could not beat you militarily, what would I do?

If I wanted to steal from you continually, Ould I beat you physically so you could not produce anymore, or would I try to convince you that I was tougher and more dangerous and deadly than you think?

Would I inflate the numbers of deaths or deflate them?

If I were China and wanted to defeat America economically would I inflate the numbers of covid-19 deaths, even going so far as to use marxist-aligned American media and inflated numbers of deaths with apparently smuggled videos of Chinese authority brutality?

It is too easy. Find a Chinese dissident, infect him, her, their family or families with poison, at the point of death have them dragged out of their homes by military personnel dressed in biological warfare gear.

How easy it would be to pretend a citizen took pictures and/or video on a phone and “smuggled” it out.

As long as 50 years ago the democrat party and its satellite states were working with communism and other forms of marxist tyranny. Ted Kennedy reached out to Russia in 1980 for help in his bid against Jimmy Carter for the democrat party nomination. He also communicated with the Soviets in 1983 to sabotage Reagan’s reelection.

This propaganda campaign, the political war China needs to win first, needed a fertile environment for propaganda to easily be planted and expanded. Democrat states and cities, where opposition is silenced to a large degree and investigation by opponents and adversaries cannot make a start, logistics of government being refused access.

Low and behold,, New York, corrupted through and through by democrat party and liberal/progressive/bolshevik control, manages to experience a covid outbreak in spite of the so-called covid being everywhere. Still, today, after months of apparent epidemic proportions cases and deaths, no other city or state, except a handful controlled by democrats and liberals, has shown to be either so inept or so ruthless. Take your pick. I believe both.

California only locked down two days before New York, and certainly had ten times the exposure to the media/cuomo bothers generated crisis. Communists, marxists, tyrants, democrats and bolsheviks jump to power on the stepping stones of crisis after crisis. Covid is the big one, fabricated minimally in China but grossly expanded in America by the liberal media.

There is no corvid-19 epidemic anywhere in the world. There is, however, as usual and as never-ending as ever, a crisis creating mechanism to defeat China’s and bolshevik/progressive enemies.

A good liar lies about his or her lies. A good liar gets caught telling a wrong lie so the victim never suspects the lie affects other means.

If China is behind this so is the democrat party and liberal media.

If our President were truly a president of the people, he would stop everything and fire all the CDC immediately. If President Trump were a president of We, thePeople he would make American “taxpayer” (I hate that term) funds available to bolster the middle class to class-action lawsuits against individuals, governors who have destroyed livelihoods, businesses and lives. If Trump were a president of We, the People he would tell the governors that anyone who continues to violate Americans’ rights will face charges and lawsuits. The President can declare an emergency, and reverse all marxist/bolshevik gains the oligarchs have made through congressional deception. He can declare a national emergency and make business go back to work. He can do all the same things Pelosi and the bolshevik traitors have done, for the strength of America, private businesses.

The dem/libs duped them all.

The dem/libs duped them all.
The “amazingly intelligent” radio talk show hosts, Rush, Savage, and Levin, were all misled from real crimes, committed by the democrats and liberals, to innumerable distractions.
The dem/libs never intended for Mexican and muslim invaders to vote because they don’t. One would be hard pressed to find a news clip of a Mexican, an illegal invader, voting.
I personally know many Mexicans: not one has ever voted.
The propagation of misinformation was, and still is, the key tactic employed by dem/libs who know Sun Tzu’s, and others’, tactics of war.
Make no mistake: the democrats and liberals are at war with We, the People. They are using, and have used successfully, Sun Tzu’s principles.
The first principle we see is that the democrats and liberals have attacked the plans themselves.
Kavanaugh was a plan in the making. The idea of attacking a plan is the easiest assault. It is preemptive in many ways. Attacking a plan, plants doubt.
Sun Tzu’s words: “Warfare is deception.”
Deception is warfare. He or she who deceives, wages war.
The best way to defeat an enemy is to help the enemy defeat himself. Attacking a plan plants doubt the enemy entertains at first, then expands.
The purpose of the so-called Honduran invasion and heavy, heavy news coverage, is to distract. It is one of a long list of many distractions. Distractions must be continual and of numerous varieties to capture and hold attention. Sun Tzu’s words: “Therefore if able, appear unable. If active, appear inactive. If far, appear near. If near, appear far.”
The Honduran situation, the invading army, appears “far” because it was created far to hide the near, active, hidden danger.
The fraud; the deception, is that the invaders elect democrats.
Democrats have not won elections in decades. Indeed, the swamp creatures, the politicians of the unrepresentative branches of government, have propagated so many presumptions, most could not believe or even entertain the oppressive, overwhelming lies and deceptions.
Totalitarian rule must be built upon totalitarian deception. Are we not amazed at the total ignorance of the apparent masses of democrat voters?
We saw a glimpse of scarce democrat support during the 2016 presidential campaign.
A simple reality is that Candidate Trump, at the time, was amassing 20 to 30 times the number of supporters, voters, and electors.
How many Mexican invaders could we count at Clinton “rallies”? Why no democrat-biased media campaigns of Mexicans and Muslims voting? Could it be they did not vote, that the claims of democrats obtaining illegal invader votes were active while the actual voting was inactive? Inactive, or ineffectual, reality, as opposed to dem/lib claims, there was and is an active something, hidden and unknown, until now.
Surely the media did provide scant examples of Mexican support and other dem/lib claims: always organized for but never connected with Clinton rallies. That, alone, makes one wonder if the invader rallies carried credibility for media claims.
We, the public, were witnesses to innumerable claims by the media, and we were slowly brought along to believe the reports. It happened because the masses cannot believe that someone could lie all the time. It is the dichotomy one side has fabricated.
However, we witnessed, time and time again, and still witness it at Trump rallies: scores of thousands of people in support of something, but NOT Trump. Trump is and always has been the representation of something.
Stop, please, and think about that.
If we are led to believe that the tens of thousands represent a mere 50 percent of the voting population, we may be fooled already. It is a given, a full admission by the mechanisms of the opposing party, that roughly half of America votes republican. If hundreds of rallies rallying thousands of supporters represents approximately 50 percent, then three rallies of barely over 1,000 cannot possibly represent the other fifty percent of the voting citizenry.
The formula is the same formula in use by those who claim the democrat “side” is determined by the same variables even though the formula does not produce equally consistent results.
Wikipedia reports Candidate Trump delivered 187 rallies while there is no list for Hillary or Bernie. Combined the democrat variable for the same formula approaches zero, really if the tallying people and mechanisms cared not to tout a terrible loss compared to the Trump masses.
The average attendance at Trump rallies was 6,460, top estimates being 29,000 and 25,000 while Hillary was lucky she had over 1,000 attendees at a maximum of three rallies.
There is no formula for that failure to draw crowds, especially when Clinton could not produce a variable for the formula dem/libs themselves use.
It was the dem/lib media overwhelmingly announcing that Trump supporters represented approximately 50 percent voting support, while the dem/lib media fell silent on the obtuse impossibility that near non-existent numbers at a fraction of the number of rallies somehow, magically produced approximately 50 percent voter support for the democrats.
Democrats claim Trump supporters put him in office, “…speaking to his base…”, as the media proclaims, while claiming non-existent democrat voters almost put Clinton in office.
If “…speaking to the base of supporters…” translates to approximately 50 percent for Trump, then “speaking to the democrat base also represents a percentage of voters supporting democrats.
The ratio, according to the numbers, is about 30 to one in favor of Trump. Is it possible the Clinton campaign really, only “spoke to a little over three percent of the voting population? Quite possible given the overwhelming Art of War Tactics the democrats and liberals needed to employ.
If large numbers at rallies, according to dem/lib media “reports” put Trump in office, then that should translate to an equally identifiable factor in determining the so-called and approximate 50 percent that voted for Clinton, and other democrat politicians. Where is the evidence of anything close to 50 percent support for democrats? It cannot be found nor fabricated. The dem/lib media did not try to fabricate that discrepancy. Empty dem/lib algebra and claims were inactive while the reality of the shattered formula was active.
The dem/lib media actually cannot lie completely, although they would prefer it. They admitted, and still do, that candidate Trump and President Trump spoke and speaks to his base, at these rallies. Was Clinton speaking to her base? How could such a small, near non-existent base for Clinton translate to almost 50 percent?
We are constantly reminded that the women’s vote went to Clinton and almost always goes to democrat politicians. Where was it then? It was at the bigger rallies, for Trump.
We are constantly told that Mexicans and blacks vote heavily in favor of democrats. We are constantly told democrat politicians represent the minorities. Does low minority turn-out at democrat party rallies magically represent 50 percent or does it represent low voter support for democrats. Surely, irrefutably!
It is assumed dem/libs do tell truth on occasion, and that is completely erroneous.
Sun Tzu’s principle, “If they have advantage, entice them.” Who is enticing with crazy claims and false attacks, in everything they do and say?
We are in the first stage, the political stage, of war, moving into more dangerous stages, right now, even on the very eve of an election.
Sun Tzu’s principle: “The political war must first be won before the military campaign can succeed.”
The dem/libs have employed Sun Tzu’s principle of distraction in this political stage of war: deception.
We must realize that the democrats have the vote-counting mechanisms in their control, in a manner, and that they have had them in their control for decades. We could consider these logistics as part of the deep state. This is the active while the inactive, again, is the apparent acquisition of new voters, who do not vote.
The dem/libs long ago invaded propriety and honesty in the representative process, transforming and disfiguring it to suit their political campaign.
Invaders do many things. One is they invade to take-over land and space. The act of taking is theft. Taking over, to use a phrase the invaders have used for decades, is to take. It is to take that which does not belong to the takers.
Why do democrats propagate this crime against the nation and the people of this nation?
Stop! Who relinquishes control and who does not not. George Washington is the republican star of relinquishing control while the democrats are seeing it, from YOU; from We, the People.
Why does anyone try to gain control of anything, referring to the vote-counting mechanisms? Think about that for a moment.
Consider a baseball team that gets control of the scoring mechanisms. We all know why. We call it many things, one being, ‘having the umps in the pocket of the team’. Anybody, any organization that seeks a subversive, cloaked acquisition of counting mechanisms, seeks to cheat. It is for the primary purpose of taking that which does not legally and fairly belong to the takers. But why do takers, take?
The mental aberration is that the taker knows the taker cannot acquire honestly and legally that which the taker wants.
There is no way around that reality.
While the democrats and dem/lib media have been organizing and presenting crazy, what has happened out of public purview?
Sun Tzu’s principle: “Therefore a wise general will strive to feed off the enemy.”
The republicans, conservative talk show hosts and politicians, have been feeding the enemies’ plans for years by speaking to their crazy and enhancing the subversive dogmas the totalitarians behind the scenes have presented. The fundamentals: Constitutional Republicanism, self-governance, representative permission and accountability, and economic freedom, have been inactive, until now.
If democrat party voters and supporters would honestly look at the crazy, outlandish statements of their own “leaders”, Pelosi who acts like she is suffering dementia, and Maxine Waters who speaks to incite violence, they would see what republic-oriented and conservative citizens see, crazy. Are these two democrats, for example, really crazy, or are they exhibiting distractions to hide something?
Sleight of hand in the political arena (not the representative forum) is a trick the dem/libs use continually.
We have been bombarded with three main frauds. We have accepted three main frauds.
1 dem/libs have a basic misunderstanding of realities but generally tell the truth.
2 dem/libs have convinced the masses, even some in the republican party, that republican and conservative is right wing. It is not. Conservative means to conserve that balanced middle the founding fathers established, on the true scale: left is totalitarianism and right is anarchy.
3 Democrat politicians get roughly half the vote, sometimes a little more to win elections and sometimes less, to their losses.
We, the conservatives, the balanced middle, are occasionally stunned and cannot believe the whacky things the democrats and liberals say and do. They have us chasing their tails. Dem/lib crazy, unprincipled and illogical words and actions give us an overwhelming amount of discussion topics, and it occupies our time, efforts, and attention, by design.
What has happened while guards at the door of public purview and opinion, have been preoccupied with the media marionettes of distraction dancing “far” down the hallways away from the guarded doors of reality?
Comments from the dem/libs are purposeful distractions. There should be no doubt their comments and events have captured our attention.
That is a dangerous state in which a nation should not find itself trapped.
What happens while we watch the building burn? The arsonist stands beside us, watches with delight, and sneaks into the night to collect insurance money the next day.
America is burning to the ground, so it appears.
Sun Tzu’s principle is as old as time. It is a trick so useful and easy, the Three Stooges employed it for their slapstick comedy:
Curly presents his hand at his own waist, then circles his other arm behind his back, up and over his shoulder to hit Moe. As Moe is looking down the other hand comes from above Moe, out of Moe’s field of vision.
“Generally in warfare, if (you or your forces are) equal, be able to fight.” Dem/libs never debate, they never stick to a topic. They do not fight because they are not equal: their plans are not equal, being weaker. They know it and employ correct principles of warfare.
“Generally in warfare, if weaker, be able to avoid them.” Dem/libs have mounted massive campaigns to avoid the principles, attacking plans and isolated individuals.
“Generally in warfare, if fewer, be able to evade them.” Again, massive misinformation campaigns, actually using their enemies’ resources, to evade. How many times have we heard republican politicians and so-called conservatives in media and talk radio argue in favor of democrat party and international liberal dogma, that America is a democracy?
The talk show hosts “get it”. What the talk show hosts mean is they believe the democrats do not understand, and the talk show hosts and hostesses spend valuable time explaining to those who fully understand sleight of hand and deception. Nobody can be as stupid as the democrat politicos pretend to be. It is sleight of hand. It is Sun Tzu’s and Clausewitz’s tactic of distraction and deflection.
Imagine an army wants to invade a country. It plans to cross the border of a neighboring country at a certain point on a certain schedule. But, the army announces plans to invade at a certain point on a certain day so the defending country can mobilize and destroy. That is the most fool-hardy tactic an army, or political party could employ. There is absolutely no deception in that, except if the army’s tactic is inactive, or a ploy.
The best tactic is to win the political/misinformation aspect by feigning an attack; leaking false information for a location and date, and attacking another point three days before the leaked date.
Leaking information, spying, is a tactic of all aspects of the war. We have seen dem/libs employ this for years, to distract.
To apply this great tactic in deflecting attention is to attack a border, with an army that was never intended to reach the border. The defenders mobilize, spend the nation’s treasury, contributing to the loss they create for themselves: numerous principles engaged.
How would we describe the Honduran, mostly military-aged men, army moving to very specific locations?
What is the hidden “active” while the inactive, far, feigned attack captures our attention?
The dem/libs are cheating right now, and have been for weeks, to steal, to take-over, TAKE the election.
The Honduran, inactive, invasion is genius: diabolical.
The dem/libs, like the word :”bolshevik” are a small minority. They have feigned large and looming because they have employed all Sun Tzu’s principles: particularly attacking the weak with bigger forces.
Sun Tzu’s principle, “Generally in warfare, if ten times the enemy’s strength, surround them, has effectively been employed by the dem/libs for decades. To attack a smaller, weaker enemy, simply find one not aligned with others, Kavanaugh, for example. The democrats always unite their forces against individuals, appearing to be more numerous than they really are.
The question nobody is asking is what are the dem/libs doing behind the inactive distractions?
The numbers show the democrats have, at most, half of the claimed public support of the voters (25%). In another I wrote article I estimated Clinton had, at best 27 percent of the popular vote. Later I reduced it to approximately 17 percent.
Hillary, at best managed to entertain three rallies with attendance over a thousand, while Trump consistently filled arenas. An average of 6,460 per event, times 187 events, all over the country, involving different people at each and every rally, accounts for 1,208,020 supporters while Clinton and Sanders together cannot show any rough, meagre estimates.
Where is this massive democrat wave? Is it hidden in the respective nothing?
It is non-existent but we believe it is something because of sleight of hand, distractions.
WE, the People, need to physically invade the vote-counting mechanisms and take the count ourselves.
We need to physically take and do, NOW!
The next phase the dem/libs will employ, already planned and in execution now, is the seizure of Congress by force.
Beware! This series of events, and election, mirrors the bolshevik seizure of the Politburo, and subsequent slaughter of Russians and others for decades.
We care not if the few democrat party voters go crazy and whine. We, the People have a commitment to even they themselves, to assure no take-overs, no coup, no fraud ,and no intended genocide.
In my ten years of fighting dem/libs on craigslist and other public forums, of the thousands of claims I have personally investigated, I have yet to find a truth a dem/lib political agent has told. That represents totalitarian deception and distraction.
Totalitarian force cannot be obtained without totalitarian deception, and that is the warfare democrats, liberals, and the bolshevik media complex behind the scenes (and openly), have been waging against We, the People.
There was no Russian Revolution. It was a bolshevik invasion, the same we are witnessing in America NOW! They changed their identities to progressive.
The bolsheviks had, as a primary goal, the elimination of Russians to the count of 30 million people.
What do you, yes, YOU, think the bolsheviks want to do with Americans who have thwarted totalitarian rule ing America for centuries?
Is 100 million eliminated enough for the blood-thirsty dem/libs? No, the dem/libs account for, in my estimation, at most 20 percent of American population, leaving 80 percent guilty of resistance to totalitarian bolshevik/dem/lib/progressive rule.
This means 80 percent, in bolshevik/democrat/liberal minds, can be ruthlessly and justifiably eliminated. This includes minorities.
Please, read. Read The Constitution and The Bill of Rights, YOUR rights.
Search the roots of antifa. It goes all the way back to the bolshevik invasion and the attempted invasions of all countries, including America during Woodrow Wilson’s (democrat) presidency.
We must do more than vote. We must watch the vote counting, even where not possible.
Make representative, self-governance a reality in spite of deep-state, fifth column, subversive democrat party hegemony. Be there, be everywhere.
Our reticence and fears will be our elimination.
It is critical NOW. It is critical now more than ever before. The progressives/bolsheviks are poised.

THERE IS NO CONNECTION BETWEEN RIGHT WING EXTREMIST AND CONSERVATIVE OR REPUBLICAN.

THERE IS NO CONNECTION BETWEEN RIGHT WING EXTREMIST AND CONSERVATIVE OR REPUBLICAN.

The constitutional republic is the perfect balance between left wing government) and right wing no government. Republicans and conservatives ARE the balanced middle. The liberals and democrats have fabricated a position that those that who want to conserve this balance are right wing. It is erroneous and the dem/libs know it. A common tactic of tyranny is to create an identifiable enemy to unify and manipulate the ignorant masses. We despise obama because he is a liar using this tactic If it lies like a dictator, undermines the voice of representation of We the people, like a dictator, and dictates like a dictator, IT IS A DICTATOR. All the fabricated cartoons, attacks ad hominem, and detractions using race fabrications and destroying evidence (Clintons) provides nothing for an argument.