THE MEDIA DOUBLES DOWN ON DISTRACTION, PRESUMPTION AND DEFLECTION, NOT ON FACT OR TRUTH. Part 2.

Sorry it took so long to finish Part 2. I have business out of the country.

To continue: The “reporter” claims, “We’ve investigated three separate atrocities in Bucha.”

The reporter and “NEWS” outlet did not investigate a damned thing. They assumed, presumed, executed a narrative, and pretended to report fact. Did Rivers trace the path that led to the deaths? Did Rivers follow the tracks out of Bucha to find the culprits? Did Rivers investigates what he presumes? Did Rivers regurgitate the narrative provided or investigate?

Rivers and the corrupt media went where they were sent, looked, filmed and concluded, in ignorance.

Their investigative efforts were so discarded that, in reality, what they did, was little more than make statements of what they claimed is conclusive.

Narrative separates cause-and-effect. When the lies flow so easily the viewer must surely question even the obvious. Are those bodies really people?

You, many, would justifiably say or think that there is no way anyone would go to such lengths to fabricate “NEWS”, by placing dummies in the streets.

How do you know what things people will do to make money? How do you know that nobody would stoop so lowly to manipulate the “NEWS”? Have you heard of crime, theft, fraud, lying, stealing. murder?

But the “NEWS” would never do that, it affects them too. Are you sure? You cannot know for certain anything and yet you presume what they narrate is truth.

Please, do not be naive.

In one part of the video the narrator claims it was apparent that it was the Russians. ITV “NEWS” knows this because they found one Russian shell casing, five bodies in a basement, and V written all over the buildings. WOW! That is undeniable rubbish. It is all limited, scant circumstantial evidence, nothing more. Not a single witness, just “authorities” providing narratives.

One round to kill five men, V written all over buildings to give a clear admission for the bolshevik/banker media that Russians killed these men, and and an interview of the sister of one of the dead. She says, in teary eyes, “..those animals showed up and took his life away.”

What animals? She does not know. She was told who to blame, and she either went along for real, or she is acting. Happens all the time.

Who did it?

She is convincing..

Where are the other fascist battalions? Are they in Mariupol or roaming the countryside doing what fascists/communists do: kill innocents who support republican principles?

The narrator uses the word “executed” numerous times. Does he know something he is not reporting? What weapons labs, chemical labs, or biological warfare labs are in Bucha. What underground resistance did the five men execute?

If it actually were Russians who killed the five men, surely they used five bullets. If the Russians were so meticulous to take four shell cases with them, why not the fifth? If it were actually Russian military that killed the five men, and they were careful to remove four shell cases from the crime scene, why would they mark V everywhere? Did anyone see the Russians marking “V”? That would make a witness. And who is to say the fascist battalions are not in superior communication, dressed in Russian uniforms with Russia/Ukrainian transports and tanks? One bullet, five men? Ukrainian fascists, trained and aided by corrupt, obama/biden/clinton administration CIA operatives and technology.

What has happened to Russian communications? No “NEWS” regarding blocking Russian technology?

Is it possible Russians pulled out of Bucha long before the corrupt media claim? The dead tell no lies. They also tell no truth.

Why were the men executed? Were they Ukrainian fascists?

We have a number of possible scenarios here, and the sub-standard reporting, based on a total dearth of real investigation, curious markings and inconsistent evidence, a woman crying after being informed of who did what; all this is fake reporting of nothing. Every aspect should have you wondering what other lies the corrupt media has propagated.

Was the one Russian General, who stated Kiev objectives had been accomplished, an actual Russian general?

If you think this all far-fetched, ask yourself what purpose superior internet and communications technology does?

So many questions, troubles, inconsistencies, outright lies and fabrications, placing false evidence, Almost nothing coming from Putin, who would be pleading with the world and in constant conferences trying to make his case.

So many things I do not know, but neither do you.

Presumption of guilt will get us all killed.

To reiterate, one shell casing, too obvious “V”s on tanks and command headquarters buildings: all too fake.

Do Russians not have communications to know where their units are?

They forgot their radios at home? ‘D’oh, guess we have to invade without radios.’

They are close to home, spent months setting up logistics, including communications and somehow, Ukraine military is superior? Ukraine had nothing forward so they could not put up even a tactical retreating defense. A defense position, if you have artillery, is a best case scenario, but Ukrainian military lost as Russia rolled in, as corrupt media tells us, and then had to retaliate, giving up advantage. How stupid to think the outdated Ukrainian military, without CIA and American troops could mount anything, except run-away.

If Ukraine is actually putting up a fight, it is not the Ukrainian military doing it.

One shell case that the “5th column”, fascist media found and placed, and we are to believe they investigated anything and even have a grasp at truth.

Why were the men executed? What did they do?

Is it possible they were actually Russian separatists and were executed by the CIA, Ukrainian fascists,or neo-nazis? Maybe, whoever they were, they were executed by the vicious, bloodthirsty fascist battalions in the Ukrainian military.

Maybe they were pro-Russia Ukrainians who were so sick of the corrupt obama/biden/zelensky corruption and extortion, they preferred reunification with Russia.

This is war, you realize: I am not sure the inconsistent narrator knows.

You do realize that the word republic has definite importance, throughout the world and through history, yes?

It was the communists who slaughtered Republicans in the Spanish Civil war.

It is republic the world over that is, in varying degrees, representative self-governance and freedom. Republic is what fascists, communists, bolsheviks and dementocrats all hate.

It is republicans the fascists, bolsheviks, communists and dementocrats all kill. In Ukraine, as in every country where there is an understanding and push for republic styled, representative government. Because it happened in Russia, we are now watching one country’s resistance to international, babylonian money-magic tyranny, and we are, as planned, being dragged into the conflict and impending slaughter and genocide.

Do not be naive. Dementocrats are currently killing people in Ukraine and in America. They are killing people in so many different way. They are killing, where they get away with it, anyone with an understanding of, and effort to establish representative self-governance, whether they are called republicans, nationalists or Russians.

The corrupt media makes evil of representative, self-determination, by any name, and they tag decent people, by the hundreds of millions, as counter-democratic. Democracy is just the very thing republic, representative people want destroyed but most do not realize that reality because they have been conditioned to think that democracy is good, or at least acceptable. They forgot it is democracy that has invaded and destroyed countries, not republican self-governance.

They have forgotten that it is democracy that invades, kills and establishes, unrepresentative, babylonian money-magic tyranny; democracies without individual rights guarantees, all over the world.

Vaccines have killed tens, if not hundreds of thousands, all un-reported by the corrupt media.

Do you see the pattern here?

If it kills, it is ignored, if it represents self-governance and rights for all, it is portrayed as anti-democracy, and vilified by many descriptions and names.

For example dementocrats refer to republicans as right-wing, right-wing-extremists, fascists, conservative right-wingers and it is all lie a fraud, a fabrication. Republic is the balanced middle.

Remdesivir, laboratory made snake venom, a dementocrat entrenchment, is killing tens, if not hundreds of thousands (see Stew Peters’ interview of Bryan Ardis in ‘Watch The Water’).

You should be able to wonder about all the claims. Really, truly,

Would it not be an expansion of thought and brain function of a normal human being to question things, maybe just one thing? Try this question: why are these bodies not buried?

You should know it is possible that, maybe this or that “reporter” is exaggerating, or lying. Reporters and “reporters” are, after all just people.

A question you should ask of me is how I know. You should ask what proof I present.

I ask you, what would it take to convince you of just one scenario I have postulated?

Do you apply the same scrutiny to the Rivers/ITV “report”? If you do then you realize Rivers/ITV has proved nothing and the theory is no better, no more provable, and no more credible than any of mine. In fact my theories have logic while ITV tosses it and replaces it with terribly inadequate, circumstantial and planted evidence.

How can you not wonder about truth, perspective, or simple opinion-based “reporting”? Reporting without connection of cause and effect is opinion only.

The documentary makes absolutely no connection of so-called atrocities with the perpetrators, making this “documentary” nothing more than an opinion piece, an op-ed.

How many American civilians have gone to Ukraine to fight? How did they arrive at the conclusion that Russia was to blame when media has not provided a single shred of evidence or proof that Russia or Russians did anything?

I watched a video, a seemingly sincere report, about a number of paramilitary battalions, not just one. When it serves the corrupt media’s purpose to report only one unique paramilitary unit, the documentary focuses on one and narrates as if it is the only paramilitary battalion. In this case the “NEWS” outlet had to make sure the narrative did not reveal there were many. Their deception is always carefully scripted.

Furthermore, the corrupt liberal media, all medium, must know the truth; the reality, so they can avoid it.

Rivers/ITV has to know truth so they can deceive without letting a truth slip our by mistake. and not let truth escape their clutches. The truth was found in another “documentary”.

You see, the corrupt media reported THE Azov battalion, as if it were the only one, while they knew damned well, there were more.

Why do liars lie? They have to.

In this same documentary a reporter, interviewing Ukrainian Nationalists, seems to interview a real man who is home from the war, on leave, presumably. Why is he home, when the fighting has increased? Is he an actor as well?

The reporter, states, “…interesting dudes, clearly nationalists. They also said f__k the police, f__k the government, burn it down.”

I ask, is that a good attitude? Are they anarchists? Is anarchy good, safe, civil? According to left-wing, liberal, bolshevik/banker media, are nationalism and anarchy not fascistic and therefore?

I am never astounded that to liberals and bolsehvik/dementocrat media the narrative is always more important than truth. I am also never amazed at the hypocrisy, inconsistnies and contradictions. I am sure you are amazed at what I say, but have you really, truly studied their words and cross-referenced anything?

Someone is lying and you only think you know.

In reality fascism is not anarchist. It is cousin to communism, socialism, bolshevism, and all forms of left-wing tyranny including democrat-party democracy.

Do these soldiers sound like representative government types, or do they sound oddly like America’s “anti”-fascists: BLM and antifa?

They are crazed, left-wing radicals, that claim to be involved in the fight, but appear to be at home, avoiding the fight. Do you see this reality?

Do you see the problems here? The mainstream media reports an anomaly, the Ukrainian Nationalist Azov Battalion, fascistic but fascist in a good way, for Ukraine.

That is, again, impossible.

A vampire is a vampire and a scorpion cannot stop from stinging. A fascist is a fascist and, even by the nationalists’ own words, rebellious to government and police. How is fascism good, again?

The media, the “reporter” of this let it slip that there are more than one fascist battalions. Are you curious as to how many? And what is the fascist goal? Are the fascist battalions’ goals commendable? How do you know? Why would you presume something good of fascists after media has vilified fascism? Is fascism good for a country because a corrupt, lying media makes that claim?

If there exist in Ukraine fascist battalions, and Putin is fascist, why are they not allied, or are they?

I would bet that almost the exact opposite of every single claim the corrupt, international, bolshevik/banker media makes is true.

LIMITING CHOICES IS CHARACTERISTIC OF UNAUTHORIZED RULE AND FAKE NEWS: RUSSIA’S OBJECTIVES ACCOMPLISHED OR FAILED? PART 1

A source that presents limited choices is characteristic of governing done without consent of the people. Limiting choices is characteristic of institutionalized ignorance. Media and government that proffers a narrow field of causes for effects is not government for the people, by the people and of the people. It is tyranny.

The mainstream, dementocrat/progressive, bolshevik/banker media presents two options regarding the battle for Kiev. Why only two?

Simple economics of tyranny: create a dichotomy and control both sides.

This tactic of limiting options is typical liars’ manipulations.

Where is the best place to learn to swim, the deep end or the shallow end? Neither. The best place to learn to swim is on deck or at a waterfront on the shore.

Argue if you must, it is just anecdotal for sake of illustrating how easily it is to control discussion by presenting apparent opposing views.

Were you so easily tricked? Did you believe me when I presented only two options? In how many “NEWS” articles and rules and laws are you presented a narrow choice of options, and thought? Thought is what it is all about. Thought leads to actions, especially when emotion is attached. Rulers, media knows this but you don’t think about it enough to save yourself.

My swimming anecdote could be argued but the point is that those who try to limit your mental comprehension, your intellect, basically, do it to exploit you.

Was the battle for Kiev a feint, as some media arguments claim, or was it a failed Russian objective? Was it a failed feint?

The corrupt controlling media, has given only two options; two opinions or two and only two scenarios, here, as in almost everything.

In fact, one could say it is a sign of deception when media controls discussion with only two dichotomies.

Let us take the immediate, obvious flip-flop of the corrupt media claims.

Was Kiev a failed objective? The opposite has, again, at least two perspectives: failed, or not an objective at all.

What if the opposite of the claimed “report” is true, that Kiev was a successful operation? Were the Russians truly trying to take Kiev? The narrow narrative of the corrupt, political, mainstream bolshevik media declares it

Was Kiev the objective? If the corrupt hate-stream media claims Kiev was the objective, then it was not the objective. The corrupt media cannot tell a truth.

The other “report” is that Kiev was a feint. The criticism then is that it could not have been a feint because it was too costly. Who says it was too costly?

If it was a feint, for what was it a distraction? Do you think mainstream media would reveal the real objective?

In all this, there are many perspectives and variations, none of which the mainstream, dementocrat/bolshevik/banker media can allow to be known.

It is established that the CIA was operating in Ukraine. See my article:

THE RUBRIC OF LIES AND FABRICATIONS… PART 6

But wait, you say. If I just mentioned the mainstream media lies about everything, surely it is a given that the mention of the CIA being in Ukraine is also a lie.

Sure, but how?

There are many ways to lie.

The corrupt media has only a few tactics that deflect, distract, and deceive. They have to provide a mix. When only one tactic is used it is easier to spot patterns.

Disclosure of truth, always limited and with a necessary amount of deception and sophistry is the tactic used here.

You see this sophistry of admitting slight mistakes in judgement or interpretation, and then re-asserting the commitment to the original claim is given greater credibility because the reader assumes an admission makes the source honest.

We see this all the time in global hoaxing, I mean warming.

The writers, not scientists, create new terms and make up words and twist meanings, all in a context of fake science and decorum. The perfect example is the word “liberal”.

Liberal has the same root as liberty, but total government control, the new liberal of many decades, has very little commitment to liberty for all. Total, centralized government control is the opposite of the word liberty, and even more egregiously opposite of the root of liberal, but it is the new word today for the opposite, and it fools people.

It fools people to follow false narratives of totalitarian control, while people feel a false sense of security believing they are “liberal”, or free-minded and open -minded, when they are exploited and ignorant drones.

Just being unaware of the words liberal, liberty, and the common root, liber, is a degree of ignorance the corrupt media and the bolshevik/banker dementocrat party have fashioned for much of America, and the world.

My estimate is that the assault on Kiev served a number of purposes: 1) chemical warfare labs and nuclear installations and stockpiles were located close to the Capital, Kiev, and were either destroyed or dissembled.

While feigning an attack on Kiev, they actually attacked parts of Kiev, and took their objectives. Or, the corrupt media called the attacks on industrial areas and parts of greater Kiev an attack on Kiev itself, again, to distract from truth that there were very well defined objectives. An accurate look at parts of Kiev hit, not to be expected from corrupt bolshevik media, would show patterns of concerted effort by the Russian military.

I am beginning see a strategy emerging but cannot say for sure yet. When I can I will let you know.

No doubt one of the ways to distract from what Russian military objectives might have been is to distract with emotionally charged “NEWS”.

Was Bucha, close to Kiev, a depot for labs and installations of chemical weapons?

Consider the photos and impression you have of Bucha. Do the images of Bucha remind you of a small town, with a main street and one set of traffic lights? Is that really Bucha or the impression the corrupt bolshevik/banker media wants in your mind? And why?

The crime, not reported, is not that Ukraine and the corrupt U.S. government, through CIA operatives, had been planning continued and increased assaults on Russia

The alleged crime followed to distract and manipulate public sentiment, focused on alleged criminals given no presumption of innocence, no defense, no cross-examination of accuser, and no voice to present a smidgeon of truth.

No, the crime was created after the fact by fifth column agents, probably the corrupt-to-the-core CIA agents sent to slaughter people who knew the truth of Bucha.

The accusation of alleged crimes against humanity, allegedly executed by Russian forces has absolutely no backing or evidence. There is no way the Russian military carried out any crimes against humanity, and not a single person has firsthand knwowledge. There are a few questionable sources, no doubt, but still mostly circumstantial not knowing for sure if the forces and organizations were actually Russian.

If the corrupt, internationalist, bolshevik/banker media said so, then by one tactic or another, it is not the truth..

Donbas region was already liberated so there was no need to liberate the region, so liberating Donbas was not an objective. We already know,

As Putin stated, Russian troops entered Ukraine to secure two new states’ independence: Luhansk and Donetsk. By pushing beyond, they did that.

As I stated many times, the people of these two states are predominantly Russian. It is quite possible, I speculate, that the votes to stay in Ukraine or return to Russia, reported by the corrupt, bolshevik/banker media as dishonest and Russian-influenced, was a tue representation of the majority of people in that region, to return to Russian society.

You must understand the perspective of people in the Ukraine Russia region.

The people are basically one. They originate from the Kievan-Russ empire.

Ukrainian language is slightly different because at one time in recent history (I forget and cannot be bothered to look) the Ukrainian language was slightly changed to accommodate a differentiation.

Ok, so I am not versed in this aspect, but it does not matter.

I speak some of both languages. Counting to 10 in both languages is understood by the other.

In one case the number one is “one”. In the other it is “first”, 9 and 10 are dievet and diecet or deviet and deciet. Like four and five, fuor and fiev.

So, regarding “Ukrainians” living in corrupt Ukraine, many would prefer to be slightly Ukrainian and mostly Russian, and be in better, more representative Russia, than corrupt exploitive and in trouble Ukraine.

What the western media is not revealing is that since the obama/biden bolshevik take-over of Ukraine the Ukraine economy, life expectancy and standard of living has dropped drastically. Russians and Ukrainians alike in Ukraine long for better days and lives as part of the Russian Federation.

Do you realize that in the term Russian Federation, just the word, “Federation” is a part of a greater representative awakening on the pat of the Russian population as a whole?

What is Federation? Too much to cover, Look it up and study Federal/Federation in the book, “The Federalist Papers.

There is so much, I cannot cover everything but you need to know, if only lightly, principles that have made America, and Americans, as a result, great. This is not boasting. Another topic, another day. Laugh out loud.

I picture a newly emerging Russian nation, a nation that restores representation to a degree, and rooting out corruption in Russian government across the nation, would be appealing to Ukrainians as much as it would be to Russians.

So, back to this “war”. The border has been moved and it is quite possible the Russian military will fall back to the border delineations originally desired, but, of course, not reported.

In any fight, you fight harder than you think you need to. This applies in a street fight or a major military offensive. It is easier to let up as circumstances may dictate, but you certainly would be foolish to not expect a better fight and/or more from your enemy. Of course the corrupt demented bolshevik/banker media will not mention anything real or logical so there will never be a presumed truth or reality expressed for Russia.

So Russia can push far into Ukraine, to the very capital itself, relent, accept “loss” and retreat to borders easier to defend.

Hit hard and back off. Let the initial shock be part of the following campaign that works in the minds of the enemy. Sun Tzu’s principles.

The Ukrainians and world can heave a sigh of relief that Ukraine is still somewhat intact, and also accept an armistice or peace agreement of some sort while it appears Russia must also compromise, accept loss, and retreat: all part of the predetermined plan and objective.

Some call it haggling. Negotiating from a position of power is always the goal.

Stockpiles and chemical weapons labs in operation cannot be allowed to survive, but if they do, the hit, the attack must be enough to make the enemy think twice about further lab and chemical weapons enterprises. This could have, and should have, been one of Russia’s objectives.

Is Ukraine deterred? Did Zelensky, worried about alliance with internationalist bolshevik/banker tyranny and sk for negotiations with Russia, two weeks ago?

Do not be surprised if Zelensky is “taken out”. He was, is a puppet dictator hangin’ out with giant black widow spiders. See my articles….

It would be understandable that the Russian military did more, accomplished more, was far more successful and less injured than the corrupt media reports.

Real Russian success must be overshadowed by the corrupt media to give Russian military a failure and reason to execute war crimes against Ukrainians, for an emotionally charged, irrational response form…dummies.

It is all fabrication, executions by fifth columns of CIA creation.

Did you catch that? I did not mention it loosely.

One of the objectives of the Russian incursion was to eliminate fascist forces in Ukraine: forces preparing to invade Russia, more.

Is this not reported by mainstream, bolshevik/banker media?

No (sarcasm), that kind of deception is just not right and international bolshevik/banker media would never stoop so low.

Of course most fascist ideologues of the Azov brigade are ignorant, but manipulated to believe they have a worthy cause. These forces, that do exist, communist or fascist, all have commonalities: ruthless, lawless, impositions of rule with no representation granted for subjects. It can be explained in other terms as pure, ruthless, self-serving, majority rule democracy.

I imagine a panel of seven people who rule about your guilt or innocence, and then dictate law without your involvement. They rule and you live or die. See the Russian made movie, “The checkist”, 1992, to see just how evil democracy is.

Communism, Maoism, stalinism, democracy, all are evil incarnations of fake representation, majority of a small party or committee, or panel rule on those denied access. Do you see the evil yet?

Now imagine a governing democracy of 435 members….