TRUMP FOR JUSTICE, THE TRUE MAGA, OR ANOTHER POLITICAL AGENT OF DISTRACTION, DECEPTION AND DELUSION. PLEASE, MR PRESIDENT, PROVE ME WRONG

There are things that must be done to prove President Trump is what he says he is: 1) must not abandon our presidency to communist, marxist Chinese agents biden and harris, and the deep state globalist/marxists in collusion; 2) justice for criminals of the obama and clinton administrations, arrests and charges laid, immediately; 3) elimination of unrepresentative IRS and immediate arrests for violating constitutional law that did not legitimize IRS and federal income taxation; 4) criminal investigations with or without Barr, into FI, CIA, NSA, and IRS collusion, and immediate arrests; 5) charges laid for innumerable crimes of murder, assault, battery, and violating constitutional rights by those who swore oaths to protect; 6) media arrested and tried for treason; 7) arrest, imprisonment for sedition and other violent crimes of all antifa and BLM members and leaders, for inciting violence and criminal activity, while they await trial, under prosecution, for treason; 8) no committees, no distractions, no appointments but, instead, immediate arrests and charges for innumerable, publicly known crimes, including media fraud and sedition; 9) arrests and charges laid against democrat party members who violated oaths of upholding the constitution, who threatened, extorted and made false accusations. This includes every single federal democrat politician and numerous republicans such as Willard Romney, Governor Herbert, and others.

It should be realized none of the above was accomplished by Trump, making America a banana republic, again.

We hired Trump for justice. Justice, punishment for injustice, is a deterrence. Deterrence is the most important aspect of punishment. It sends a message to others contemplating crime.

Justice above all is the mark of a civilized nation.

We elected Trump to clean the corruption and just-us from the Justice Department, and motivate Justice to act in behalf of We, the People.

Draining the swamp is a cliché for justice.

Ending establishment politics is a cliché for justice.

Ending politics-as-usual is a cliché for justice

Making politicians accountable is a cliché for justice.

Stopping insider trading is justice.

Ending party politics, restoring representative government, is justice.

Ending the misinformation, stopping the liars from lying and manipulating, is justice.

What is MAGA? Is MAGA, make America great again, a booming economy without justice so fascist/bolshevik corporations can spy, censor and seize our wealth?

Is MAGA a great workplace without free elections to secure the fruits of our labors?

Is MAGA a lower tax base across the board while non-governmental organizations (NGOs) ravage and legislate without representation?

Is MAGA lowered tax base and rates while independent IRS increases audits, threatens, seizes property without constitutional processes, and extorts compliance and the wealth of We, the People?

No, MAGA is nothing without “Justice for All”, justice before the law; equality before the law. MAGA is injustice without justice across the board, and this is the Trump success, failure to secure justice for anyone, anywhere.

I had hoes Trump was an actual man of the people, but the facts glare.

I still hope for the best, that President Trump retains the presidency We the People won, and then finally gets justice, firing Barr, and thousands of others. Was “firing” people not Trump’s Hollywood legacy? How could he fail so miserably when that is his strength?

What will be Trump’s legacy now? Will he be left alone if he leaves office? If he is, we are clued that he was one of them all along, absolutely avoiding the common denominator, the fundamental principle of all aspects of making America great: JUSTICE.

Will Trump’s legacy be a good president? If Trump abandons our presidency, will the media cease their attacks and universal maligning, proving the media played the charade with Trump?

What will Trump’s legacy be, that he went along in secret or that he tried, was hated, but served the vast majority, 75 million voters? If Trump has no legacy of justice, he has no legacy.

I wonder if legacy is something he really cares about? What is in it for Trump? Was he let in on the secrets of the Priesthood of Moloch and the bolsheviks?

I know the secrets. It would take you, dear readers, 10 years, too late, to discover what I know. And I am not telling you.

I know the means to the alternatives, but who deserves it?

We, the People secured absolutely no justice from Trump’s efforts. It is almost as if that was the plan. It was executed very well, according to plan?

Barr did nothing. Three Supreme Court appointees did nothing. In fact they joined the progressive bolsheviks in deflecting and promoting corruption and centralized government.

We wanted obama and clinton investigated for their crimes in Benghazi. We wanted obamas, clintons and bidens investigated for spying on Americans. We wanted justice: MAGA.

Let us face this reality, that in spite of all the talk of Trump working for We, the People, and making America great, he did not, absolutely did not make America safer or secure. How could he be apparently so successful in so many areas, in spite of media propaganda, but media, completely hateful of Trump in all things, manages to be soft on Trump’s failure to make America safe again (MASA). Trump failed at making America just again, (MAJA). He totally failed at a lot of things better, as if by plan.

If Trump magically maintains the win he and We earned, and continues to avoid making America just again, we will know we have been deceived by the biggest fraud the global underworld has ever executed.

We wanted the clinton crime family activities arrested and the criminals to pay for their crimes. Did Trump, at the beginning of his campaign, not mention Hillary will not be in the whitehouse, she should be in jail.

Did America, the dwindling moral majority; the honest and patriotic citizens not delight in the thought that the clintons might pay for their crimes? Damn the ignorant minority, crime is crime, whether the media acknowledges or deflects.

Trump protected the clintons by appointing progressive/bolshevik supreme court justices, wearing conservative/republic-oriented clothing and then covering it, overpowering all decency and pretenses with black robes of the moloch priesthood. Why were Barr and his puppet attorneys not fired by the master Human Resources innovator and cleanser: Trump? How did Trump allow so many failures and rejects of OUR constitutional republic skate free of scrutiny and arrest, make wealth and deals behind the scenes, but provide not a scintilla of justice for We, the People.

Nobody can say Trump is a failure. He was very successful at distracting from the real goals of MAGA: justice.

We will have no justice in our future because none was sought for these last 12 years.

We wanted the obamas and all their hypocritical allies and colluding ravagers to stop, and pay for their crimes. We wanted traitors barack and hillary to pay for their crimes of killing American citizens, Ambassador Stevens, for example, but only one of many.

We, the People wanted the censorship, hatred, and deep state government, media and massive corporate collusion stopped. It is literally the definition and execution of fascism and marxism, and it all got worse, in spite of talk of MAGA.

If Trump lets that maoist puppet, biden and his puppet whore, the genocidal maniac harris take office it will be the biggest injustice heaped upon Americans, and will lead to the slaughter of hundreds of millions. I have been saying all along the tactics used by democrats, progressives and liberal media mirror tactics the bolsheviks used to slaughter 30 million Russians, Russian citizens.

The democrat/progressive/liberal goals and marxist/bolshevik/fascist goals are the same, spoken in nice words of rights that are not rights; generosities that ravage the population; freedom that forces obeisance to ruling democrat party oligarchy and marxist subversives; employment opportunities that denies rights to work; politicians serving themselves legislating their own gain and impunity; politicians claiming to work and  serve while serving injustice; politicians claiming to bring the country together with diversity while legislating and forcing one party and a one-party system; and innumerable other verities .

What is most important is, what will be the legacy of We, the People?

Did we wait for a savior, one in bed with the enemy? Did we put trust in one man, surrendering our powers, authorities and force of justice for all?

If Trump abandons our presidency, I will be busy.

If Trump stays and four are years of injustice reign, I will be busy.

There is only one way out of our surrender to oligarchy or monarchy of Trump. Both options fail We, the People and serve international tyranny.

The only option, the founding fathers knew, Abraham Lincoln knew, and a scant few others, is We, the People take back our country, our government, our authority. It is all done by force, our power.

If Trump gets in the way, he goes too.

I write all this knowing that if this information, this call to arms is considered significant, my life may be in peril, from whomever. So be it.

I fight, now!

I dare not write my goals, my plans, but you, dear fellow citizen of free America, the soft, exposed underbelly of a misinformed, maligned, used, and disappearing true citizenry, need to know your enemies from your foes, and eliminate your enemies. If it is to be by force, so be it.

This is a legal, conditional warning to tyranny, cease and desist, or We, the People will organize and adjudicate, with or without corrupt injustice, against you!

BENNY BOY MCADAMS HAD BETTER HOPE THE TIDAL WAVE OF INVESTIGATIONS INTO ELECTION FRAUD DOES NOT REACH INTO UTAH

Just a thought: Mcadams was defeated even though the count was fudged in his favor. I said years ago the democrats are dumb. They do all kinds of polling so they can find out how much cheating they need to do and then the egomania kicks in and they think the polls are wrong because nobody could hate the democrats. They did not believe their own polls way back in 2016, when President Trump was elected, and they did not cheat enough, leaving themselves holding the bag with an altered count and losing the electoral college: the real election. Dummies!

But the boneheads did not learn, not having human capacity to look at themselves and change. Again, they did not cheat enough…wait. They cheated too much. But wait, they did not cheat enough for the candidate they had.

I estimated Hillary had, at best, 27 percent support while candidate Trump had the rest. Hillary’s machine must have cheated a whole hell of a lot.

Then sleepy, creepy Joe is appointed with the most hated, dishonest woman in politics, and the democrats know they have got to cheat, but they did not cheat smart. Over 300 affidavits in Philadelphia alone, and thousands around the country. Whistle blowers everywhere.

Benny Mcadams had better hope the tidal wave of investigations does not reach him because we know he is dirty. He almost cheated enough but again, my point, democrats are sick and twisted. Their supporters are fewer than democrat politicians believe, and fewer than their supporters think. Democrats are a vaaaaaast minority.

I have been pushing for election fraud for benny, obama, pelosi, schumer, whacky schiff, mutt romney, chairman gary herbert Mao, hatch, and adding mendenhall and wilson.

In fact I say we go back to backwoods billy bob clinton.

Good luck benny. I am sure you can go back to being a crooked lawyer. Biden is looking for a partner.

RESPONSE TO BOISE IDAHO CRAIGSLIST POST OF OCTOBER 7TH, 2020, “Trump’s American Values”

RESPONSE TO BOISE IDAHO CRAIGSLIST POST OF OCTOBER 7TH, 2020, “Trump’s American Values”

Original Craigslist html:
https://boise.craigslist.org/pol/d/boise-trumps-american-values/7210162290.html

Liberalnewsreview link, click here

So what if he made that comment, “Grab them by the pu__y”? Was it for all America to hear? People talk.

Have you heard the banter in women’s change rooms? A girl-friend of mine, some time ago, was quite explicit in describing the disrespect for men most American women openly share with each other, in expected privacy, The corresponding language of some is quite offensive. So what? Don’t listen.

The rest of the hate-poster is a list of lies.

Maybe bolshevik-dick can show us a newspaper clip or police report. All this “information”, if it were true is public knowledge. No?

Would a person trying to convince another of something not use all information and means available to change another’s mind? Are dem/libs so dumb they don’t know, or are they dishonest, trying to manipulate others in ignorance?

You see, dear reader, the tactic has no substance and no integrity.

Backing is a general term for providing a source, a witness, or document.

Propaganda discards this need and pursues an emotional, disconnected course to manipulate.

Propaganda means propagating information but inherent in the definition is the condition that the information is misleading, false or deceptive.

Did President Trump collude with Russia, for example?

Is this not the claim democrats and some republicans, the entire liberal media complex and others, have made for years?

Russian collusion, Russian collusion, Russian collusion, sounds like the grumble words actors use to make the sound of a mob.

Is the propagation of misinformation the goal of the comic-strip post, “Trump’s American Values”, or is it real and truthful reporting? Did someone search and find these things, and then report, or did someone begin by writing a list of things fro shock the senses? It seems the latter takes precedence when one checks the veracity of just one claim. What are the crimes, again?

Russian collusion is one such accusation. Is it a crime?

What if it had been Canadian collusion? Is collusion the offense or is Russia or Canada the offense? Can the author of the comic strip please explain what offenses each accusation represents?

Why is the accusation made in such a generalized word, Russia? Can “Russia” witness or provide evidence? Do the democrats know this? Do they know Russia is a very big and complex country? it is fraudulent, and goes against one very important, major “value” of American life; a value that is inextricably connected to justice? Do the democrats know what presumption of innocence is? Of course they know. They have been hiding behind it for decades, maybe centuries. It is part of our American tradition that we presume the best of each other, all being part of one society working together one way or another.

We do not build this country, engaging in commerce, trade, and culture for the benefit of the economy. The economy is inanimate. We do not work together, enjoin in military and long-term programs for military institution rather, wo organize ourselves into a collection of resources for legitimate self defense, for selves and each other.

We do not salute the flag, sing anthems for the sake of the dirt or the shores that define American soil, rather we respect the flag as a collective reminder that it represents We, the People, and the values and traditions that allow us all to live in collective self defense, justice and presumption of the best from each other.

With what part of Russia did President Trump collude? Did someone see him over there, in Siberia, colluding with the vast forests? Was he talking to trees? Who saw what?

Did he collude with the dirt? Did he collude with the water surrounding the Kamchatka peninsula? Did he collude with Moscow, and what part, the spires, the cats and dogs, somebody? Was this evil, dastardly collusion accomplished by nothing with nobody over nothing that happened that anyone witnessed? Was he even there?

Did he talk to someone, maybe an ambassador? At least he did not kill one of his, our own, like Barack and Clintons did: Ambassador Stevens.

Let us look at the loose, the mentally dysfunctional communication skills and composition. Without an object the subject does nothing. In fact, without an object, the action of the subject does not exist. For example: I went. If I did not go somewhere, basically I did not “went”. Is it a lie if I mention I went, nowhere?

President colluded, the anti-witnessing goons proclaim. With whom did president Trump collude? Did President “went”, or collude somewhere and with someone? When and where did he go, and with whom did he collude?

If the conditions are not met that he went somewhere and that he colluded with someone, not a bag of dirt in Siberia, then the collusion claim is a lie.

This explains the whole of democrat party democracy. Somebody did something even nothing was done to anyone, but democrats want blood. It is a different presumption to presume guilt without evidence. It is more cynical and devastating to proclaim the results of a crime, without evidence oil a rime, yet democrats constantly do it, relying on the ignorance of cause-and-effect challenged, and deductive-reasoning-void well wishers hoping without evidence of reality, for gain from nothing. The gain can only be accomplished after this lack of reality is bypassed, by theft, plunder and ravishment. Welcome to democrat party democracy, and liberal la-la-land just-us.

Is it a lie if there is no evidence of collusion? Can anyone define collusion and state how it is considered and where it is notarized a crime?

Four years of democrat and liberal media accusations and witnesses; witnesses  not even remotely witnessing anything, exposes distinct dem/lib fraud, if not a complete lie. It is all to propagate a lie that  a fabricated result of crime proves there is a crime.

Through four long years of dem/lib accusations, we never heard from a witness who actually witnessed something. Democrats did not present a single witness and some republicans jumped into the child-id democrat parade of silly clowns of the liberal media/democrat party circus.

For the purpose of endorsing a product, would it be wrong to identify someone as an Olympian who never participated in the Olympics? Unless the Olympic Commission cared and sued, it might only be a financial waste of money to pay for such buffoonery, but democrats have done it for four years, and still bother, harass and accuse President Trump and try to trick We, the People with the major missing link, a witness.

The tradition of presumption of innocence is under the democrat/liberal/progressive boot. This unique American tradition is drawn from centuries-old development of justice. American justice is American culture: legally, legitimately, and ethically connected with law. It is this very unique and liberating tradition democrats, liberals and marxist/progressives attack.

You, yourself, dear fellow American, democrat or republican, liberal or libertarian, would demand your right to be presumed innocent if you had been under the same four year long attack, for just one day. And yet, democrats have not one whit of sense for the rights to presumption of innocence in their four year long hatred. Democrats cannot find one day of preponderance for the institution of justice and equality before the law. Dem/libs cannot find a scintilla of cognition for the near-sacred tradition of each and every citizen in America who has an undeniable irrefutable right to live free of oppressed, unjust, burden of guilt.

The democrats paraded democrat political clowns before the American representative republic, and they do it every day.

They know their charges and accusations are fraudulent, but they hope the cruel and self-serving disparaging will eventually blossom into information, as opposed to misinformation. They know misinformation does not become information, just as they know that cartoons do not one day come to life. Or do they know this?

Lies, accusations and attempted applications of guilt without trial and evidence, does not continually stack up and magically come to life as real, but dem/libs, played by the puppet master marxist progressives, do not care for the sanity and minds of themselves: their own slip into hate-motivated insanity of cause-and-effect, presumption and justice.

A list of accusations, as fabricated in the “poster” cartoon, backed by nothing and no object of the subjective offense or crime, makes empty accusations to be known lies: dem/lib, progressive/marxist propaganda.

We see in that comic strip 40 offenses. Some are offenses. Some are accusations of crime.Some are things like business loss that happens to all kinds of people. Some of the things in the list are outright silly, and cannot even be taken seriously for the character assassination attempt, and nothing else that they are: hate.

Let us start with the accusations:

Grab them by the p___y: one event found offensive by those who hate so much they discard American tradition, they claim offensive in others: presumption of innocence.

Was, is it a point made: a point for a crime? No, but let us give it half a point for offensive: .5

For other points of an argument, let us break down each accusation, avoiding presumptive, evil generalities:

Child rape accusations: 0

White supremacy/incessant condemnation of it: 0

Dishonoring Gold-Star families:   0

Birther conspiracy: started by Hillary Clinton, Trump wondered, so what? 0

Other attempts at points of argument (40):                                                 all:  0

Character assassination over life events: 3 disavowed.  0

I count, of 40 things listed, 36 that could be offenses, and crimes but have ZERO evidence, ZERO backing, ZERO credibility, and invoke the American tradition of presumption of innocence because there is no evidence.

So, the agent provocateur made 40 accusations, 36 of which could be offensive or criminal, but credulity is given .5 for only one accusation, one point the agent provocateur, bolshevik-dick, is right .5 of 36 claims, or 1.29 percent of the accusations.

Is this the kind of sense and honesty you want ruling you?

RESPONSE TO BOISE CRAIGSLIST POST: Re “Trump is the biggest driver of COVID misinformation.”

Re “Trump is the biggest driver of COVID misinformation.”

What study is that, liar?

Really? Was it President Trump who did daily “COVID” press conferences for, what three months, with specialists in the CDC, etc., etc., etc.? Or was it Biden? Maybe Kamala Harris, the Clinton crime syndicate, Newsom, Cuomo the killer? Maybe it was Michael Obama, or his husband Barack Obama sin laden? Maybe the people most informative was the whole democrat party, while they spent all their waking hours trying to impeach and remove President Trump, as they lied about everything?

Is that dufus, bolshevik-dick really that stupid?

LOLOLOLOLOL

Hahahahahahahahahahaha. TOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO FUNNY!

It is so laughable, and so lacking in intelligent cause-and-effect, and sense, I just cannot deal with the immaturity and child-id ethical-retardation of lying liberal agent provocateurs of the left-wing extra he mist party.

What a maroon. ‘What a mal-a-maroon’, as Bugs Bunny would say.

Is that bolshevik-dick the same bolshevik that claimed we are approaching a zombie apocalypse? Is it the same moron-mutt that said zombies were going to only be able to order brains, for food, through Amazon? How stupid can a self-induced droning, dementocrat get?

Is that the same simp that pretends he/she/it is not a high-school dropout, barely able to formulate a complete sentence with proper hominyms (your, you’re, too, to, and two)?

What moronic proclamation to try and pass off as intelligent: does not even pass the sub-intelligent, dog-bark test. Welcome to dem/lib la-la-land. Woof!

RESPONSE TO CRAIGSLIST POST RE: “Trump is behaving like Mussolini and despots that the US usually condemns”

Re: “Trump is behaving like Mussolini and despots that…”

This is going to be fun.

You can find this on Boise Idaho CL at:
https://boise.craigslist.org/rnr/d/trump-is-behaving-like-mussolini-and/7218462238.html

and my site reference:
https://liberalnewsreview.com/2020/10/02/craigslist-post-on-or-about-october-1st-2020-trump-is-behaving-like-mussolini-and-despots-that-the-us-usually-condemns/

I love these fights. Wish I had more time. Between actually working for a living and working on my website, liberalnewsreview, I am quite busy.

Which despots does the “US” condemn? First off, what is, or who is, the US? Does dick mean a president would condemn a despot, communist or fascist, while Obama and his buddy Biden refused to condemn Fidel Castro, a murderous bolshevik bastard?

Did old balmy sin laden condemn Iran’s tyranny or did he give them hundreds of millions of dollars? Maybe it was billions or bazillions of dollars. Funny? Dem/libs, bolshevik/marxist devil-agents, do not understand humor.

No, dick, asshole supreme, President is not refusing to commit to a peaceful transfer of power. What a moron.

He did, however, refuse to be set up. He is going to win. Like the democrats, President Trump has something that will guarantee the win. It might only need to be the democrats and liberals’ incapacities to look at reality and adapt. That is what happened to Hillary.

The democrats discovered, through their own polling, that they needed to alter and/or eliminate republican votes by about 20 percent. Idiots, big-headed egomaniacs, did not believe it and only altered 10 percent. Big mistake in cheating, and that is why they lost.

Dick claims it is shattering that he is “refusing” to commit to a peaceful exit. Maybe he will resist in advance, by spying on the opposition? D’oh that was Obama and Hillary.

Maybe President Trump will resist by creating a false dossier and lying to a FISA court to spy on Biden. D’oh, that was obama biden and clinton.

Maybe he will hire FBI to entrap and lie. D’oh, that was Obama, biden, clintons and comey.

Maybe he will spend four years after the fact, trying to impeach Biden on hearsay and rumor, all fake witnesses who witnessed nothing? D’oh, that was biden, clintons, obamas, comey, mueller, pelosi, schiff, schumer, crazy maxine and the whole democrat party with a few bolshevik republicans: Pierre delecto (how embarrassing), mutt romney and others.

Maybe he will set up surveillance after the fact, as a back up plan and further spy and manipulate and misappropriate FBI efforts? D’oh, that was biden, clintons, obamas, comey, mueller, Pelosi, schiff, Schumer, crazy maxine and the whole democrat party with a few bolshevik republicans: Pierre delecto (how embarrassing), mutt romney and others and FBI agents Strzok, and Page.

Maybe he has already done something? One can be certain, that the investigative prowess of the media and democrats would certainly uncover anything the president is doing to cheat. No? I almost forgot, they are not investigative reporters.

President Trump is obviously out-smarting them, or, they are contributing to their own failures to investigate. Who knows what goes on behind the scenes, except for those who look.

Nothing more to write regarding bolshevik-dick’s stupid fabrication, except what we all know: that every claim bolshevik-dick makes is a fabrication or outright lie. Have a good day, everyone, and enjoy the laughs from the democrat party comintern “think”-tank propagandists.

I might add, dick, the filthy lying piece of rat-crap, actually misquoted. I guess he/she/it, archon supreme, is either a moron or a filthy lying marxist.

Hey buddy, bolshevik-dick, giving me more ammunition for my website, thanks.

We should meet and talk. Oh, sorry, forgot it takes an IQ of 25 to bark and you are only at 22.

LETTER TO READERS AND FELLOW CITIZENS

Letter to readers and fellow Americans.

If you like my work; if you believe I may be offering words of wisdom and caution, you must also realize evil will surely try to silence me. Please, copy and paste, record these warnings. It may seem dramatic but I fear for my life at this point. If Clintons can get away with mysterious, unsolved deaths, over 80, surrounding their rise to stardom and power, then there is a powerful element in government and/or Washington and/or politics in general that may try to stifle, for good, me and my warnings.

Mark my words, and pray or hope I am foolishly wrong, but ‘cowering-in-place will be extended to May 1st at the pretentious discretions of a lying bolshevik, governor herbert.

It may be that the sleeping giant, California suddenly has an outbreak, and relapse is inevitable. America is under siege by evil in government. The possible scenarios are innumerable.

I had my misgivings about President Trump. The attacks against him border on treason, inciting violence in the least. I have wondered how, with such bombastic, threeatenifg political executions against him, he has not seemed worried or done anything unusual to protect himself. Has he sued any democrat or liberal media personality? Isn’t suing one of his great strengths? 

With the attacks by the democrat party and liberal media on working middle class Americans, shutting down millions of small businesses, Either he vetos everything the governors are doing, and proves he is not one of them, playing a part of apparent opposition, or he is one of them in establishment politics; government as usual, and has betrayed We, the People all along.

Trump did, after all, surrender all his/our gains in a fear-inspired gesture to accommodate liars, bolsheviks, haters of mankind in the democrat/bolshevik party.

I warned America of a centralized government and the distractions to mislead us from the power grabs of governors. I warned Americans of the organizing and congealing of power in the hands of a few politicians: governors. They have stolen our law and rights, but not really, We fight. I fight. This may be it for me. Oh I hope not, I had wanted life and liberty for all but recognized evil pretending to serve the masses.. Beware my fellow citizens. When covid cowering is extended, remember I warned all. By the end of the next extension opposition will be removed by the evil doers, governors and their armies arrayed against We, the People.  Talk is cheap. Giving away our rights to the outright evil of Pelosi’s ravaging bolsheviks, is much more than words and I fear the republican trust for Trump was and is the pretense at representation to which republicans flocked like blind democrats to outright evil in the democrat/bolshevik party.

We, I fear, have finally been conquered and genocide is slowing taking Americans. It will not, like anything and everything come in a form noticeable as a coup, but it follows as surely as night follows day.

More re: “Donald says Martians hacked Democrats and Clintons.”

More re: “Donald says Martians hacked Democrats and Clintons.”
Bolshevik-dick claims, “With no evidence to support this statement…”.
What statement?
There is no statement so the claim, the proclamation that bolshevik-dick made is a nothing. We call it a non sequitur: ‘not be’, or ‘non (verb) to be’
NOTHING.
Most dem/libs live in the non sequitur reality: a not reality.
Look at that fabrication, hardly worthy of being called a commentary.
A commentary makes a statement.
Dick made a statement that was not a statement because it lacked the reality variables he/she/it claimed were part of the statement.
This is the typical dem/lib circular argument they try to mislead the masses with.
Sometimes these arguments are massive fabrications, total lies, and sometimes the non sequiturs are little jabs at reality and truth, like this fairy tale.
Actually, it would not make it to the credibility level of a fairy tale because often fairy tales are actually based on some reality.
Little Red Riding Hood and the big bad wolf is a well known fairy tale based upon a reality that little girls, or boys, or people should not travel alone in the wilds.
Along with a degree of reality we see a moral or principle being taught.
No such thing in any dem/lib “post”/fabtication. We see it right before our eyes. Dick says Trump made “this” statement and then did not produce “this” statement.
Dick provided nothing of value except hatred, for no reason.
Do people hate wolves? Some do, surely, but not all. Is there a reality in avoiding said association with wild wolves? Is that a reality almost everybody can cling to and to which one need adapt to survive? Is that something dem/libs miss out in their own lives, as they presume to inflict such foolishness upon unsuspecting others, Red Riding Hoods traveling the forests of innumerable political wildernesses?
Is there danger in associating, in one way or another, with a real wolf in the wild? Would dem/libs try to convince you, others, the masses that real wolves in the wild are actually really, really nice, and you should pet them, kidnap a pup and take it home for a pet? Is that too much of a fabrication; too much of a presumption on my part when compared with the fabricated excessive foolishness of so many, if not all, dem/lib claims?
Judging by all dem/lib fabrications and non-sequitur claims, they absolutely would have you walk in dangerous places.
That reality is indubitable, while the reality of a “statement” that was not produced, referenced, or timed, has absolutely nothing; no substance, no reality, no moral or principle; absolutely NOTHING.
In fact it is so NOTHING, it cannot be said the “person” who posted this hate-motivated trash, is probably not real either.
Think about that when you want to believe a dem/lib is providing you with something useful by way of information. Check the information and see in the claim or proclamation, if what the bolshevik claims is actually claimed.

YAHOO”NEWS” REPORTED, NOVEMBER 6TH, 2016, If This Poll is Right Trump Can’t Win Florida – – or the Election”

Yahoonews reported, November 6, 2016, “If This Poll Is Right Trump Can’t Win Florida – – or the Election”.

With every headline and article I read, written by democrat party apologists or agents, or liberal media personnel, I am sometimes discouraged by the headline if not the actual news. I am clearly an anti-establishment supporter: the clintons being the most establishment entity in government today.

But I know, without exception now, that I always find discrepancies, contradictions and inconsistencies, if not outright lies and whacky fabrications, in every article or “NEWS” item published by any dem/lib.

Garver’s article, if I were to accept that he is relating some truth or fact, could be quite deflating. But he is simply regurgitating models and predictions, not actual polling.

Patience, my fellow American readers, I will make my case.

Furthermore, I dare not read an article from any source without some preponderance as to the truths I will find, naturally hoping to find parties I believe to be dishonest: have maybe, somehow, decided to be honest. Am I actually looking for truth? Yes. Do I find it in liberal media? You, dear readers, will have to read on and decide what is truth and what is not. To preface that I ask you, do you want to know the truth?

If I thought that voting for an avowed socialist, Bernie Sanders, for example, would be in the best interests of America and Americans, I would have been a staunch supporter. The impediment to that is that I know the history and proper application of the terms left-wing, right-wing, and volumes of related information. I understand tyranny and how it germinates and burgeons. I have studied the founding fathers’ efforts to keep America free of tyranny (by any name), and can see through the fraud of socialism. I have studied the writings and arguments for different parts of OUR Constitutional Republic, as presented to knowledgable Americans, in the days of breaking free of Britain.

I have studied the sources for the founding fathers’ insights, the ancient Greek city states. I have come to different conclusions from my contemporaries in a few areas, and theorized about many things. I have written articles for my arguments. Some of my commentaries can be found at earnwrite.com, author brent.

One of my claims and commentaries is that socialism is not a political system. It actually has characteristics of politics but nothing of the representative process. These things are different, you ask. Read on.

Socialism is a system of lying, cheating and plunder. It is an economic system subjected to and pushed by centralized political force: which is not representative power. Socialism does not remedy inequality of income and wealth. When one group is robbed to give to another there is always a cost, an inequality. There is no production from the middle man, people in government. 

Even middle men in business produce something. Middle-men typically provide a service of either delivering or marketing. What service do socialist politicians deliver, stealing from one to give to another? Who is served, besides the politician?

Socialism starts with a big lie, that government can produce something: equality.  Equality cannot be produced nor can it be achieved except when all are reduced to common denominators, poverty and ignorance.

Equality can never be achieved because some do more with the same amount of rsources. Both denominator and numerator must be controlled for equality, and it cannot be forced upon people to do less when brains expand ideas differently.

Struggling for existence in ignorance makes all men equal. Even that extremely low denominator does not make equality. Adaptability is the key to survival and growth. Socialism, the political process of centralizing power, wealth and initiative in the hands of a few self-appointed superiors, must destroy adaptability: initiative and capital. Capital comes in many forms and the socialists, the marxist democrats and bolshevik progressives know this. Capital is initiative, or labor and investment. Investment can be money or goods.

Being forced to compress and remain totally stifled upon ruler command, is close to equality. It is the total incapacity to survive, and that is what centralized dementocrat tyranny wants. The agents boast of equality, but refuse to explain the variables that must be destroyed: variables that cannot be wiped from the nature of man, any man or woman. To enforce socialism, marxism, utopia is the impossible dream, to eradicate mankind from man. Transforming people into beasts of burden is the only way. Ignorance, fear and instinctual responses such as sexualizing everything is how people turn their neighbors into beasts of burden. Who does that today?

It is the ignorance variable that makes all equal. A ruler that promises equality knows the task of forcing ignorance to the depth of animalism, is the continuing challenge and role he or she must take.

The lies and fraud that follow the big lie are designed to hide that first big lie, and move people along to accept tyranny and plunder, by many names that seem innocent. There is no innocence in taking from others by law. Frederick Bastiat referred to this as legal plunder.

Do we read to acquire information? Do we not all listen to the NEWS for information? Do we hear NEWS because we want to be deceived? This seemingly innocent statement should be qualified. It has been said we trust those most who lie to us best.

The headline, “If This Poll Is Right Trump Can’t Win Florida – – or the Election”, surely sparks some kind of emotion from anyone that reads it: for some elation, for others disappointment and even anger. This article, and articles like it, always inspire me to find the stink-bombs of fraud and deception.

Part of tyranny’s fraud and deception is manipulation. Surely, if you are a democrat supporter or a liberal, you are already discounting my words, even though I have barely stated anything against your beliefs or the democrat political machine, or in criticism of liberals manipulating behind the scenes.

I am certain I have stated something you will be able to use to excuse your information gathering quest. But if you miss the point, you miss much more than you can afford. If you refuse to read anything you miss out. If you want the gold you have to get right in the muck and mud, and dig. Neither gold nor truth jump at you and proclaim, ‘here I am’. Fool’s gold will do that and there is a reason fools seek fool’s gold in NEWS and truth.

Some dig for information to arm themselves for further deception. Some like to arm themselves with misinformation because they are afraid of truth. How can one be afraid of something he or she knows not? It is the darkness of dark, the darkness of ignorance, and the light of reality that give us cause to fear.

I hate green beans although I have never tasted them. How do I know I hate them? Is it because I have other information that tells me what I imagine they will taste like? From where did I get this other information, and is it correct? Can I be wrong? How could I possibly be right when green beans have a unique flavor, like all foods?

How can I, or anyone, be right in presumption without reading? How can I be right that I will not like what I fear to read because of the title? Is the title correct? Is the initial presentation of information correct or true? How could I or anyone know if I do not read the article, dissect it and compare the knowledge received with the claim(s) of the title?

The question to you, then, is, ‘what dreadful result of reading “opposing views” for information and truth do you imagine in your mind?’

What fear do I imagine when I read the title, “If This Poll Is Right Trump Can’t Win Florida – – or the Election”?

Am I afraid it is true?

As sentient beings we get overwhelmed with what we imagine we cannot sort through and understand. As a result of this seemingly overwhelming task, some people stick to the simple truths, or familiar biases that are not always true. The titles of so much of what we read or hear seem true but can truth actually be found in titles?

For example I can claim ‘math is easy’. Do you, dear mathematics student, now know math?

Trump will win. Do you now know it? 

Those who manipulate you want you to believe the simple titles because there is no substance to claims they make, and thus their work, if it can be called that, is done: or so they presume.

Those who profess and proclaim by titles and clichés, experience no embarrassment or ridicule. They become demagogues of superficial titles and headlines. They become their own sources of truth, by lies and fraud, all to hide the lack of substance. For example: explain to us the characteristics of democracy and how it applies to our representative system in America.

Have you, dear reader, ever heard a democrat or liberal explain it? To explain it would reveal the deception and fraud.

When the news reports a one or two sentence claim, it is a title, nothing more. The truth of any news is not found in the title, or the title-like news casts that give us one-line clichés and manipulative emotional blasting. The truth is found digging below the apparent NEWS, all of it, and getting in the muck and mud of substance.

The title, “If This Poll Is Right Trump Can’t Win Florida – – or the Election”, caused an emotional response for myself, as it was designed.

However, I have learned to not panic, and I did not. But, does it relate truth and reality? Can the author explain how Trump cannot win? Those who talk in circles of things others do not understand, and do not take time to explain the process, advantages and disadvantages, do not want intelligent followers.

Can I state a title with respect to the author of “If This Poll is Right Trump Cant Win Florida – – or the Election”? Here is my headline: Garver does not want anyone to think for themselves.

Can I explain that, or will you simply believe it? Why would you believe a title of one who tries to not explain by dwelling in the ethereal arena of misrepresented headlines?

Ah, but you do not know until you read and find the substance.

So the question comes to us, before reading any title or hearing any “title-like” news report or news cliché: what do you hope to gain by reading any news or any title? Will you investigate further or be manipulated by clichés and potentially false terms and/or words in titles? 

Another example: Read the headlines of political news reports. Titles and “reports” often have the words democracy and America in the same sentence. If you do not notice democracy and America in the same sentence or title, then search for one example of Constitutional Republic in a sentence with America. Do we assume, as a result, that America is a democracy? Some do. I never did believe it. I looked for myself. You can too, or just believe what you want. 

The initial statement of Garver’s article tries to set a presumption in the reader’s mind, if the reader has not heard opposing views or if the reader decides to accept the title because of the source, that a “poll” is a “poll” because a reporter reported it. Is that true?

Polls today, the day before the election and for the past two years have reported nothing but favorable wins and conditions for democrats.

And we can find opposing information, that will smother a few polls and any researcher woking for “truth”.

Does public education have opposing views? Is this where children learn? Garver’s is an article I would want to read for the NEWS value of it but I admit, my mind is tainted, biased, suspicious because of the absolute deception and fraud I have experienced, refuted and correct, by dem/libs and apologist liberal media. Even that, I acknowledge is a bias. But even a biased report can be dissected and truth extracted from it.

In Garver’s article I quickly found contradictions and poor reporting, as I knew I would,

But you, dear reader, may have your own bias that everything you receive from democrat/liberal sources is truthful, or you might find that it is not democrat or liberal sponsored and supportive.

You may believe polls are objective and accept that polls reveal truth, reporting just what is found in unbiased polling and questioning. At a glance, in any article, I can now find the duplicity of all democrat and liberal writers. I do not include “all” lightly.”

Now you, dear investigator, can journey with me through Garver’s  article and find truths and lies, if there be any. Will a truth cause you some emotional pain? Yes, but I can tell you that finding the truth and accepting one truth, and that one truth on its own merits, for what it really is, liberates the soul. Every step, every truth one finds is another nail pushed out of your coffin of slavery: ignorance.

Ignorance is slavery, for the ignorant, because there are those who use ignorance to manipulate others. Are you, dear fellow American, a fool, trusting others’ words without question or curiosity? How did that human trait become washed from your soul?

So, what is a poll? Do you, dear fellow American, understand every aspect and word of that “title”?

No. So few do. The ones who understand are the ones manipulating the results.

A poll is not 100 percent polling.

Like global warming, there are so few professionals involved, it would cause amazement, wonder and confusion, at how these so-called experts arrive at their conclusions and predictions, and fool us all.

Global warming has zero scientists, although democrats and liberals refer to the “global warming community”, as if it existed.

Find a scientist in the global warming community that has actually done a scientific experiment or taken measurements. There is nobody. How can one be a scientist if one does nothing scientific? How can one be a baseball player if one does nothing “baseball”?

Dig, for yourselves, and find the truth.

There are so few pollsters, the number is insignificant.

How many people, experts would we suspect are part of a “think tank”? What is a think tank?

A think tank is a handful of readers and writers that fabricate “information”, from an extremely limited amount of input, while they pretend to create scenarios from their superior intellect.

To sound intelligent and expert, they “spin”: a reference to spinning yarns, stories. “Pollsters” are think tanksters, they spin “intelligence” from an extremely limited number of people actually polled. Mostly what they do, is twist and fabricate stories that will be accepted after the fact of something sinister and hidden. Has any dem/lib mentioned that polling is mostly computer-generated predictions and models based on old data? Who does not want you to know that?

Like the global warming community, that uses models and computer-generated predictions, based on political remedies for apolitical fabrications, the think-tanksters/pollsters do the same.

Most of the “polling” is taken from biased models and think tanksters that are trying to create credibility for the inevitable incredulity.

The think tanksters/pollsters insert words, change meanings of words, and add contradictory words that shake one’s thoughts, and give the impression that the writers and “think tanksters” are intelligent. This a very few other tactics tricks millions every time.

Polling is a series of models: numbers and think-tanksters , fabricated interpretations. It could be biased but nobody would know until he or she studied polling, rhetoric (grammar) and looked at the questions think-tanksters ask. Have you done that?

Polling is like non-scientific, non-existent scientists in the non-existant global warming community. It is all done by models chasing political compliance for a fabricated fear.

A democrat party poll, is a biased fabrication of democrat/liberal opposition always making the opposing views lose. Look up a term, dialectic advancement, and you will know why democrats appear to lose, some time.

The polls are rigged and the ballot counting is rigged.

Is that a simple, manipulative title? Sure, until you check it out.

I spend more time reading opposing “NEWS” than conservative or republican/republic NEWS. What trashing can I do to truth? What critique do I have with truth without fabrication and deception? None, so I cannot “bash” conservative, historically-correct truth.

For example, America was founded as a democracy. NO. False.

America was founded as a Constitutional Republic. Oh, is that true? Is it important to know? Why would it be important to know?

Are the characteristics of democracy and Constitutional Republic different, and is one better than the other? What would make one better than the other? If we qualify the question with, ‘for who is either system better, and how’, we might be getting closer to some reality.

Who would, in the first place, not want Americans to know the truth of whether America was founded as a democracy or a Constitutional Republic? Who mentions “democracy” continually in their titles? Do constitutional supporters mention democracy in their titles? Do conservatives mention democracy in the same sentences as America? No. The two simply do not go together and do not belong in the same sentence or concept together. Why?

What truth or truths are you failing to learn and know by not being told America was founded as a Constitutional Republic?

What truth or truths do you not learn or know as a result of believing the title, “If This Poll Is Right Trump Can’t Win Florida – – or the Election”?

Before we begin to know that, we must dissect the title. You, however, must determine if you will accept truth when you find it. If you will not then you must realize you are rejecting truth: fact that will benefit yourself, and those around you. That is quite a responsibility.

It is important to know that once you have internalized truth it is not difficult to maintain. Once you know a truth you do not have to relearn it. Compared to lying, and trying to make connections of lies that surely must follow, truth is liberating. Furthermore a truth learned releases other truths from the bondage of fear.

In this case, I boldly state, elections are rigged always in favor of the democrat party. Mistakes would be made in favor of all parties involved, but that is not the case for the innumerable mistakes made in the 2016 election, and prior elections.

The youtube videos abound in the thousands. Secret interviews, explanations, redefining terms and words as their original intents and meanings, and innumerable sites and expose´s can be found and you will learn

I cannot even begin to list them.

But know this, Garver makes no references to anything that will educate you, my dear fellow citizen.

Please. Dear fellow American, do an internet search for black box vote. Check out Hillary meltdown. Anne Coulter has some great interviews and makes super points. Look up voter fraud, Petition Project.

How about Huma Abedin connections to Islam? Check out Fast and Furious gun running, Benghazi interviews, Trey Gowdy, Jason Chaffetz.

Look in the NEWS and find something, and research it until you have the truth. You will know truth. When you find a series of statements and apparent truths, and they connect easily, you have truth.

For example, We have a Bill of Rights. WE live in a Constitutional Republic system of self governance. Are the two connected and can they stand on their own?

Why do We, Americans, have a Bill of Rights? Do all democracies have a Bill of Rights? Would it surprise you to know that there is no such thing as a Bill of Rights anywhere in the world except in America? A Bill of Rights, is unique to OUR Constitutional Republic. Is someone trying to turn your, OUR Constitutional Republic into a democracy, with no individual rights? Who would do such a dastardly thing? Which rights will you, my fellow citizen, voluntarily surrender, Freedom of Speech, Freedom of Religion, Freedom of self-determination, Freedom of commerce, ownership, presumption of innocence?

Find the truths you want. Do it now before you vote for tyranny. You had better ask, and you had better want to know, ‘which party is tyranny’? You had better know because if you make a mistake the losses you wish on others, history shows irrefutably, will either enslave or kill YOU! Search for and boldly face whatever fear this “title” has caused you, and be free.

BILL AND HILLARY CLINTON LOLITA EXPRESS TRIPS: PEDOPHILIA DISCOVERED BY NYPD

Bill and Hilary lolita express trips: pedophilia, discovered by NYPD.

Unbelievable. Where is megyn kelly, matthews, chris hayes, rachel mad-cow, mika brzszszszkinszzkiiii, whatever that pig’s name is? Where are the journalists, reporters, researchers uncovering the filth and crime and graft and beastial lives and treasonous lies of the clintons and obamas? Where is arianna huff and puff, that filthy salote? Where is the whole damned liberal media?

Yes, obamas! They are cut from the same socialist/eugenecist/egomaniacal mould as the clintons.

Such filth never investigated by the filthy pig, liberal media

Obama used an alias email name to hide his involvement. How many times did obama travel on the lolita express to have sex with underaged boys?

One of her staff referred to hillary as an “egotistical psychopath.” another described an incident, “That was the most awful and terrible…and racist display- such a profane meltdown…”

Hillary claims steadiness, temperament and judgement but comes apart regularly. Crooked hillary fears the gallows, another aid revealed this, “If that (f_)cking bastard wins we all hang from nooses.” Clinton is a steady, reliable, leader” Attacking and berating her own staff?

And of course she is totally honest. If she lies to the media in the biggest fraud ever heaped upon Americans, she will surely need to continue with the deception, and who do the lies affect? We, the people, like the four murdered in Benghazi.

Wow, that was a packed meeting, at least 150 people, maybe 200, while Trump fills arenas with 15,000 and more.

I would estimate the clintons have about 4 or 5 percent of the vote, no more.

And blacks voting democrat? Not a chance.

In this youtube video, the first protester to speak is black.

Liberalnewsreview link

https://liberalnewsreview.com/2016/11/05/youtube-video-people-walkout-on-clinton-after-bill-is-a-rapist-protest/

The questions we must ask ourselves are who else will fold and who is most culpable amongst the democrats and liberal media?

I say we take them all, including weird dave, utardia, editor-predator, the muslim brotherhood advisors in the whitehouse, obamas, chelsea clinton, all the liberal media, including megyn kelly,  and put them in jail. The 10 percent that come up with the best stories and truths of the others and the innumerable conspiracies, get 25 years in prison, NO PAROLE, AND THE REST GET THE GALLOWS!

Let the crap hit the fan….

If that bastard obama does anything except sneeze, we take the white house by force and hang him in the whitehouse yard, and have a picnic, a week-long celebration, and burn that Whitehouse administration to the ground.

NEVER again do we subject ourselves to such tyranny.

The commander in chief is appointed by OUR congress, after we have terminated graft and corruption, and only in time of war, declared by We, the People THROUGH OUR representatives.

No more political parties and a return to the proper placement and function of the Senate: that dem/libs destroyed 100 years ago.