MEDIA IGNORES REAL SCIENCE AND USES CHRISTOPHER C. BURT BOGUS WEATHER BLOG TO DISQUALIFY RECORD HEAT

Today, July 13 2021, fake weather “NEWS” reports a world record temperature of 130 degrees in Death Valley on Sunday July 11th..

Reported by all the “NEWS” sources, an apparent record today, made no reference to prior records of the early 20th century.

A search produces a record in Death Valley of 134 degrees fahrenheit, followed  by another world record in Libya, in 1922, of 136.4 degrees fahrenheit. 

Two record temperatures are in question, Death Valley 1913 and Azizia Libya, 1922, discarded by an on-paper “investigation” referring to itself as a blog. This assault on science is astounding.

A simple search produced a number of results. Most notable is an article by Christopher C. Burt, dated October 24th 2016 titled, “An investigation of Death Valley’s 134 Fahrenheit (58 degrees Celsius) World Air Temperature Record.”

The “article” begins, “In 2012 the WMO (World Meteorological Organization)…, and then provides a link, “…disallowed what had long been considered the hottest air temperature ever measured on earth: A 58.0 Celsius (136.4Fahrenheit) reading measured at Al Azizia, Libya, on September 13, 1922.”

Burt’s article continues, “As a result of this record being struck from the book the temperature of 134°F (56.7°C) recorded at Greenland Ranch at Furnace Creek in Death Valley, California on July 10, 1913 became, by default, the new world’s hottest air temperature yet measured.

The record was not struck from the books. Neither recording was removed.

The sleazy slug Christopher C. Burt, pulled a number of tricks, linking the claim to an actual link at ASU, referencing C. C. Burt himself and others, who, claim WMO “disallowed” the temperature. Was it disallowed or discarded, discredited, disavowed? Disallowed means nothing, especially in scientific terms. Burt is a liar trying to manipulate reality to suit an theory that the earth is warming.

There is no record anywhere that WMO removed, disallowed, disqualified or forgot to think about maybe discrediting anything of the sort.

LIES! LIES LIES.

Look for yourselves.

But the “article”, report, blog gets worse: the unscientific hocus pocus, voodoo, science-killing and distorting of science and reality takes on  of  cause-and-effect retardation I have not seen in the worst of the bogus “climate changeling” fabrications.

The next line of the “investigation”, which is really a blog about a thought of doing a report on a real, solid, scientific event, sets up the farce for all, yourselves especially, to see.

C.C. Burt, or whomever, writes, “In this guest blog we will investigate the credibility of that measurement. This blog is courtesy of William T. Reid, a geographer and climatologist who has been studying the desert climate of California and, in particular, the Death Valley temperature record for some 30 years.” 

Whomever wrote this “article” admitted it is not a scientific study: it is a guest blog. Whomever wrote this “article” admitted there is no hypothesis and no introduction of scientific methodology: it is a guest blog. Whomever wrote this “article” admitted to destroying evidence as recorded: a guest blog. Whomever wrote this admitted there were no measurements and no-pretest and post-test: it is a guest blog.

Whomever wrote this article of a fake investigation of a real scientific event, admitted there is absolutely no science in his or her approach.

What do you, dear reader, want of those who report events and “things” to you? Do you want reality or fantasy?

Imagine the ego one must have, or the hatred for truth and propriety one must live to be able to be nothing, do nothing, and have absolutely nothing to reverse or disavow a real scientific event.

This open, blatant affront to science is a fabrication of hatred for mankind beyond most of what the climate changelings have employed in a long time. The media was just waiting for the right day, close to actual records of 00 years ago, to disavow reality and present a global warming fabrication, to trick YOU.

This is a complete, utter, disgusting lie by Burt et al.

There is nothing decent, honprable, honest, human by this monster.

While there is no record the WMO disavowed anything related to record temperatures of old, the WMO did add another bogey man, of far, another monster we cannot detect, under your beds claiming the far reaches of the earth gad record warmth. Totally unverifiable, while the reality, totally verifiable, of two records in the early 20th century are solid and real as HELL!.

Hang that bastard Burt and his co-colluders.

Again, I found no record anywhere that the WMO disallowed these two records, making Burt a liar or bolshevik-epic proportions, manipulating Critical theory for the globalist bolsheviks in one of many areas of assault.

I used the correct word, a word real science would use instead of disallowed: disavowed. Actually discredited might also be appropriate. Science would not use disallowed.

Burt is a lying sub-intellectual puppet of the global manipulation to make the masses feel guilty and submit to extermination. Burt exposed himself as a un-scientific goon who does not know science: allow is not a word real science uses for anything.

Again, there is no record that the WMO disallowed or disavowed, or discredited or disqualified anything. What kind of scummy piece of gutter filth lies like this, and why? What kind of simpleton tries to pass off grade school semantics and vocabulary; and grade school fantasy and childish word games for reality? What does bolshevik Burt gain? Somewhere, somehow, in one way or another, this rotten lying bolshevik pig, Christopher C. Burt has profited. I am stating right now, Burt is a paid political agent  of propaganda, lies.

Let us look at Burt’s qualifications.

What would you think of a professional basketball player, involved as a guest in a telephone conversation with bloggers, who then follows up with instructions on how to fly a jet?

What credibility does a professional basketball player have, in a blogger forum with bloggers who have never flown an aircraft?

What is the difference between Burt’s pretense at science and reporting? Burt’s childish report in two areas of pretend credibility is double dishonest, if that is a real thing.

Such a filthy, lying bolshevik pig, Christopher Burt, should be dragged into the streets, stripped, hung by one foot, urinated on by the whole world, and then beaten until he gives up all the names of those who bought his sick and ugly soul.

The article continues with more exposure of fantasy-styled pretense of science and honesty:, “Mr. Reid and I worked together to come to a commensurate conclusion regarding the validity of this significant planetary weather record:

Worked? They were talking, blogging. Working would be measuring, recording data, interpreting, writing an hypothesis and identifying method of interpreting data to draw realistic conclusions: all science moron Burt doscarded, openly and with little regard for readers, YOU.

Bolshevik Burt describes the “work” as coming together. For how long did these two “work together”, ten minutes? How Lon does it take for two bolshevik goons to decide too discard two records that disagree with the reality of life, the earth today is in a cooling cycle?

Does it not sound great to “…come to a common commensurate conclusion”?

How does commensurate fit in this fake scenario? Commensurate?

Commensurate is not a word real scientists use either. Bolshevik Burt must have forgotten that the word fake science uses is consensus.

Every sentence of bolshevik Burt’s fantasy is an admission of incompetence, ignorance and collusion with subversive entities. Again, why would a nincompoop such as Burt fabricate to such a dishonest degree?

FAKE WEATHER FORECASTS ARE PLANNED FAILURES TO EXACT CONTROL

Forecasts were planned failures, meant to manipulate.

Liars and thieves who want control must be known as liars and thieves who get away with crime.  Liars’ and thieves’ goal is ti be irrefutably accepted as above the law.

The “NEWS” in Salt Lake City forecast 100 degrees for June 11, 2021. It did not hit 100 but in the minds of the viewers the day was so unbelievably hot , excessively hot, extremely hot, smacks of global-warming-hot, a new parameter had been established and the viewers accepted any new standard: that 95 degrees is global-warming 100 degrees and hotter. It was just as they said and predicted. Except that it is not.

Forecast for June 13th was 104 degrees, “approaching record heat”. Does the “NEWS” ever forecast record cold temperatures, approaching record cold? NO. WHY?

It did not hit 104 degrees. It did not hit 100 degrees either. 

I have noticed a number of trends. At 5: 00 PM, Sunday. June 13th, the temperature was recorded as 100 degrees. My thermometers, operating accurately for decades showed less, 95 degrees. I have worked outside for decades. I know 100 degrees from 103/104.

I know 95 degrees from 100. It was not 100 degrees, and my thermometers showed it.

They, the corrupt, globalist, fake weather/global warming “NEWS” “people” are lying to YOU!

Again, it did not hit a new record, as forecast but in people’s minds it was excessively hot, so hot it must be global warming. Virtual pres biden called it global warming but it is not! He slipped and called it what used to be called, and what the true fabricated fear of it is.

It must be warming, but the globalist goons will not call it that anymore, because people are wise, and more do not believe than do.

The situation is like a “NEWS” person responding to a finger pointing at an alien, and claiming, ‘ that is not an alien. It is just a guy dressed like an alien’.

GLOBAL HOAXING TACTICS ACROSS AMERICA

Global hoaxing tactics across America.

Reported in Salt Lake City but tactics and lies, manipulation of reality, occurs everywhere, emanating from every “NEWS” station.

Much of deception and manipulation is creating a new parameter so the fabricators can deflect from reality, fact and truth.

I listened to a “NEWS” report June 8th, 2021, regarding temperatures in the north east states, specifically Philadelphia Pennsylvania.

The “NEWS” reporter commented on extreme heat in Philadelphia, 93 degrees. Using emotion the fake news people are creating new parameters. 93 degree heat is hot, but Philadelphia gets hotter.: well, usually, but not these last few years.

The problem this year is that it is the fifth year of long cold springs.

Listeners to the show are conditioned to think 93 degrees is hot hot hot, for Philadelphia, but it is not.

Real heat waves in the north east, in the 1970s, produced record daily high temperatures, over 100 degrees.

Today, June 10th, Fox weather in SLC, boneheaded as much as MSNBC and CNN, at times, reported a typical rail split.

Dummy Damon Yauney, reported record heat on the way, for SLC and Utah counties, then reported expected highs, in the same sentence, of approaching 111 in St George.

Immediately that bogus reporting by another loser political puppet, Yauney, puts in the viewers’ minds, in SLC county, extreme heat, in a different, removed locale, and the viewer does what people do, relates.

One can imagine the thought process: Whew, that is hot. Whew, going to be hot here too. The actual temperature does not matter now that extreme heat has been associated with SLC and Utah counties, by classical conditioned manipulation of idiot “NEWS”.

But, the bogus news was not done manipulating Utahns on June 8th.

The idiot reporter, the Fox News female weather reporter, whatever her name is (Kerri Cronk?), who cares, reported “approaching record highs” for the forecast.

Every day approaches record highs, and record lows. Every day approaching is a movement of the thermometer in one direction or another. “Approaching” means moving towards.

So, the “approaching” forecast was that the temperature might hit triple digits, or 100 degrees or hotter.

In the minds of viewers approaching means hot, maybe hitting record highs. Human nature associates the emotion injected with the local reality and experience.

It is fraud, lies, deception, and manipulation to convince you, another dufus who does not bother to check, that the world is getting hotter, while it is actually cooling. You would not believe it because in your mind, the heat you experienced last year, approaching 100 degrees every day in June, July, and August, is no hotter this year than last and cooler than the real heat waves of the 1980s.

You, the dummy reader who cannot check, has local high temperatures erased from your mind. Kerry, weather-retarded, also reported a weird “statistic”, that if the temperature reaches forecast approaches, it would be the earliest on record that the temperature reached triple digits, ever. She is stupid. She regurgitates lies and garbage from those who manipulate you. 

Cold front reported making its way to SLC, by dimwit damon, just after he reported 74 degrees, 20 degrees below daily average high temperatures. Cold air, with respect to cold temperatures, is freaking arctic temps. These people, are absolutely stupid.

“If you are ready for a break from the heat, today…”, June 10th, dimwit Yauney reported some of the valleys will drop down into the 30s, and suggested covering plants or bringing them inside. This is 40 degrees below daily highs and daily high average for June. How is this global warming? It is only global warming if you believe it, and you, dummy, have been conditioned to believe everything government and its fascist corporate surrogates proffer as “NEWS”. The lies grow and grow every day, and you believe.

Go cack and look for yourselves. In many years, in the month of May, triple digit temperatures have been hit innumerable times so the goofy, dufus, dimwit idiot weather “reporters” are totally fraudulent, if not absolutely truth-retarded. They want their money and look beyond truth and the actual search fro truth and reality.

Such filthy pigs, Yauney, Wood bobhouse, Faith Gay, whatever, all these lying reporters are dummies, dummer than the average ignorant trusting citizen, and full of evil, pursuing profit for lies.

And then that idiot Kerry comes back on and restates, heat wave, heat wave: 20 degrees below averages. Such a moron!

“….but the break from the heat…”, temperatures in the 80s is 20 degrees below average. What an idiot, Damon Yawner.

Has that moron ever checked anything or is he just another simpleton regurgitating bogus discomfort and fear from political mobsters lying to YOU!

“Finally we are going to get a break from the heat”, dimwit Yawner claims, 6/10/21. What heat? 100 degrees is a normal high for this time of year. A break from 20 degrees below “heat” is not a break from heat. How stupid can dimwit Yawner and his collaborators in deception, be?

FORECAST FOR JUNE 4TH 2021, SALT LAKE CITY, PREDICTING “NEAR RECORD HIGHS”

FORECAST FOR JUNE 4TH 2021, SALT LAKE CITY, PREDICTING “NEAR RECORD HIGHS”

June 3rd, 2021, predicting near record temperatures for June 4th, 2021.

The “NEWS” was that tomorrow’s forecast could produce record breaking highs. Part of the forecast predicted that June 4th could also be the earliest SLC area would hit triple digit highs.  Did not happen. “They” tried to make it appear that 100 was reached but you must look at the reality.

At 5:00 PM temperatures start to drop. Seldom do temperatures rise after 5:00 PM, if ever. The temperature stayed at 98 degrees for hours, even an hour after 5:00 PM, then suddenly it bolted to 100 degrees, like it was thinking it needed to respond to a command.

If you doubt this then you have no idea what science is, partially because you have never exercised it.

Science is change. If you have not paid attention, or scrutinized past events and patterns, you will not only be oblivious to reality and science, but you will remain part of the truly, ignorant masses. Everybody gets messages on their phone about temperatures, at any given moment. From where do these arrive? Do these temperatures come from the centralized (bad sign) official source? What is the official source? Have you thought about that? No? Do you know the difference between intellect and intelligence? Do you know what deductive reason is? No? Then do not question my observations.

It is all part of global hoaxing, warming, that is not warming. Please, learn scientific methodology and find scientific methodology, even just one characteristic of it, in any of the so-called climate sites.

Go to my section of CLIMATE CHANGE/GLOBAL WARMING and read, learn.

MORE REGARDING MY 3/3/18 COMMENTARY, “OCEAN FLOOR SINKING”

More regarding my commentary of 3/2/18, “Ocean floor sinking”

I had written and published a commentary refuting the moronic idea that the ocean floor is sinking. It occurred to me that I missed a major point. If the ocean floor is sinking, dropping, where is it going? That was a part of my original commentary, but there is another related point to consider.

If the ocean floor is sinking, dropping “down”, from what relative point is it dropping? There must be a measurement and comparison of pre-test conditions and post test: science.

Is the ocean floor sinking with respect to the land, the shores around the world? If it is, then water is not rising. If the ocean floor is sinking, then the ocean water level at the shoreline is dropping, not rising.

Where is the benchmark, for measuring such changes in elevations and depths? Non-existent? Hmmm, do the dem/lib dimwits even know what a benchmark is? Not very science-ish, is it?

Or, the ocean floor is sinking and water is rising, keeping the level with respect to the land, around the world, the same, constant. The dumb bolshevik manipulators of reality make neither claim. They just fabricate and lie. Who went to the ocean floor and measured the depth, and from where?

Do you see, that I almost made the argument for the climate-hoaxers by stating the water levels have remained the same, but it is because the volume of water has increased. The dementocrats and la-la-land liberals, spewing grotesque globalist/bolsheievik fraud, do not have the capacity for intellectual honesty or study. What a bunch of illiterate, ignorant boneheads.

Do you see how stupid dem/lib, progressive/bolshevik, unsubstantiated headline claims are?

It is intellect that prompts questions, not lock-step, droning, liberal news and dementocracy.

Think! Ask questions, why…

PART 2: THE BURDEN OF PROOF IN CLIMATE CHANGE, GLOBAL WARMING, “SCIENCE”

Original publication on SLC Craigslist, June 15, 2016, in response to a post by Utardia, a “writer”, regurgitator of marxist/liberal climate dogma and deception.

Part two, applying science to compare and contrast a democracy versus a constitutional republic.

Do we need to define “rational”?

A witness to anything helps clarify and also helps debunk. Clarity, truth is the goal.

When we look at the Constitution and the Amendments we find standard for many things.

A standard establishes common communication. Standards in science, must also be established otherwise we have no comparisons, no observations, and nothing obvious. Without the obvious and irrefutable, the burden of proof of science is not met, and the doubt rules.

It must be so because everything at any given point is based upon and operates around established truths: truths that for the moment seem to explain and predict.

Real science does not ask people to adjust to something not proved or unreal. Science does not, for example, ask people to prepare for dragon fire that does not exist, and the same is prevalent in all science, including unsubstantiated, standard-less global hoaxing.

Why do We, the People, have a Bill of Rights? Is the Bill of Rights for government? Government is a thing. It is a thing, like a tool, used by We, the People. Government, in America, a Constitutional Republic, is not a tool for politicians to use. The Bill of Rights establishes, quite clearly, that the amendments require burdensome effort to change. OUR traditions and OUR working laws, today, now, cannot be changed without due proof of necessity.

The burden of proof is that law requires authority; authority granted by We, the People, NOT government, to prove need.

Take the right to be presumed innocent before the law. This simple amendment: this one in particular, establishes that the individual is supreme. The Rights in the Bill of Rights, are for the individual, not a conglomerate government collective of rulers.

The burden of proof, wherein guilt must be proved without doubt, is what sets every single person in America in the same status before the law. So none, in any position, can suppress the law, and create a slave, or a slave class by extortion of law.

The burden of proof applies in all things in a free society.

Realistically, there are few truly free societies in the whole history of the world, but we can see two from which We, the People, can draw experience and guidance.

The Magna Carta, an Anglo origination in 1215 England, was the beginning of a freedom the world had never seen. It was a freedom for all peoples, not just a political class. In fact it was designed to oppose and control a political class.

You could call monarchy, dictatorship, and oligarchy, a political class. No matter what the pretentious name, a political class is a ravaging organization exploiting, using, and killing slaves itself, themselves, create.

We, in America have not fallen into slavery. Slavery has been thrust upon us. Slavery was created by diabolical, psychopathic “people”. Every single democrat politico in America, is a psychopathic monarchist. Heavy claim, but to actually join the democrat party one must surely know the democrat party is involved in a push for dictatorial oligarchy. Nobody falls into slavery by default. Nobody falls into a position of being a slave owner or master, by mistake either.

The second I know I have ill-gotten gains, taken by force or legal force, is the second I know I have unjustly profited by someone’s efforts. That is theft: it is slavery.

The burden of proof in science, is no different. It is meant to prove beyond doubt, that something is true.

How can one be sure of truth if it is not proven beyond doubt? The foundation for rationality is truth beyond doubt.

A scientist is required to make a claim of suspected truth.

I believe, for example, that coffee makes one jittery. I make a claim, called a thesis or hypothesis. A hundred, a thousand people can refute my claim, and do so rationally. All they have to say, is they don’t believe it. Their opinion is valid as opinion. A million people can refute my claim and my claim is nothing, yet.

If I were to take these million people, subject half of them to drinking one cup of coffee in the morning, while half get no coffee, and then I measure and quantify the observations, collecting them into obvious results, then I have exercised scientific methodology.

In this case where utardia claims I need to provide proof when it is he/her/it that makes the challenge against established science, utardia misses the establishment of reality, as usual, and thus remains in a state of suspended reality, refusing to change to the obvious.

I am not required to bend to fantasy while already living in established reality.

But this is the fraud the dem/lib/progressives continually try to ram down Conservative America’s throat.

I have no burden to believe a single thing utardia or any of the global hoaxers, I mean warmers, claim until I see rational measurements, results taken from the obvious and irrefutable.

We have no results of anything until something is done to produce results. Making a model does not qualify. Making predictions without measurements does not qualify.

I can claim europeans have large noses. How do I measure large? Is “large” a comparative? If so, what is the standard upon which I decide to employ? Is my standard rational, or noticeable, measurable?

If I claim europeans have large noses, is it logical I describe how much bigger they are? Is it logical and fair that I describe bigger? Is bigger longer, wider, taller, more sunk in the head?

The burden of proof is all mine.

All the sophist pretenses by dem/libs, utardia sub-intelligent dog, for example, pretending to be smart, does not provide a shred of evidence and certainly meets no burden of proof, or even a simple claim or theory to precede finding and proving the hopeful obvious. The dem/libs have never made it to the first stages of science: theory, hypothesis and intelligent claim.

Who are the dem/libs trying to deceive?

THE BURDEN OF PROOF IN CLIMATE CHANGE, GLOBAL WARMING, “SCIENCE”

Original publication on SLC Craigslist, June 15, 2016, in response to a post by Utardia, a “writer”, regurgitator of marxist/liberal climate dogma.

The burden of scientific proof rests with the prosecution. There is two basic results of science: proving a theory or hypothesis, or failing to prove a theory or hypothesis.

Utardia, that dimwit lying crap-superstar, claims I need to provide proof. Is that proof of a negative? Is that proof that where I stand exists?

A tradition is immovable until it is movable, by something new, and obvious. Global hoaxing, I mean warming, is magnificently NOT obvious, except to dictatorial goons making big bucks off others’ fears, and obvious to bogus scientists extrapolating something from clearly NOTHING. When I say nothing I mean no data, no pre-test, no post test, no control group, no measurements, but lots of polluting and “reinterpreting” standard, immovable data.

It is all a fraud, a lie based on imaginary demons and fire breathing dragons, heating up the world. Where are the dragons other than the nether reaches of political scientists’ ever-augmenting ethereal interpretations of imaginary science from cosmological shock troops?

I might add that all those innumerable “climate scientists” do not exist. There are writers galore, political puppets who quote each others’ papers and stories of studies.

“The oceans will rise by 20 feet by the year 2015”, 144,000 Witnesses of Jehovah will be taken heavenward in 1918, I mean 1933, I mean 1975, I mean 1999, I mean okay who is this Jehovah guy”? “The climate system will kill millions by 2012”. Pictures of moose dying, deserts and dead fish on the shores all cause world-wide stench by 2010”. Obama will turn back the rise of the oceans by shear will power.

Some will argue he did it. Then why do we need anything else? Why do we need political exertion, taxation and subservience to the democrat party and liberals when obama can do it all?

Come on people, the oceans have not risen, temperatures have dropped. It is colder today, it cools off at night, and summers are shorter. Fewer people die from heat waves today than they did 20, 30 and 40 years ago.

We stand on solid ground of tradition. Somebody designed a thermometer well over a century ago, and that same thermometer is the standard.

What is the standard?

Water boils at 212 degrees at sea level, and freezes at 32 degrees. There is no change in that. That is the standard. Who will challenge that? Who would even think that this fact is not one of the world’s most reliable templates? 

Why do global hoaxers, I mean warmers, even attempt to change these standards?

We can always make new thermometers at the boiling point, and and it is still the standard because it is still the boiling point and we design and change OURSELVES to that fact.

Global hoaxers, I mean warmers, have been trying to change We, the People, and reality to their inconsistent and shifting predictions. They have no standards because they are sloppy, pretentious, anti-science comic-cons. Where is the data?

Data is not data unless it has a standard and a means of measuring preconditions and new, or changing conditions. This is science, the beginning of science.

How do we measure time? We measure it by change. We make a 24 hour day of a time frame between sunrise and another sunrise. We don’t dictate that we want 24 hours in a day, and make the planet rotate different. But that is the approach global hoaxers, I mean warmers, have taken.

We do not look at the sunrise and try to slow it down so we can have 25 hour days. That is ludicrous. It borders on insanity if not full blown lunacy. But that is what global hoaxers, I mean warmers, are trying to do with no data, no pre-test, no post-test, no measurements, and no sea level markers. They have not even tried to present this simple experiment because it is a failure every time.

Surely, somewhere along the way, maybe 10 years ago, maybe 20 or 30 years ago, someone, a real scientist, must have surely stuck a stick in the water and measured ocean levels regularly to show ocean-level rise. Why has no scientist presented this data? Would this data be irrefutable if it could be found to show a rise in ocean levels? Absolutely, and I would concur. But there is not one single reference to a stick in a rock anywhere? Absolutely nothing! NOAA, for example, has absolutely nothing that represents a stick in a rock, or anything an intellect could imagine and design to measure change.

So, I ask, are oceans rising? Surely it must be obama that stopped the rise, with just his word.

How much did it rise before he made the promise? ZERO! That was a  pretty safe bet for him, was it not.

It must be zero, otherwise dem/lib politico/scientists would have shown us. NOTHING!

The burden of proof is always on the upstarts, the new science, the new theories and hypotheses.

I am a cop, standing in the middle of the street, directing traffic. Who will argue that traffic flows at my standard, stable, already existing presence?

It takes a pre-test to assert the variables for the study, and it takes measurements of some sorts (maybe time lapse of driver response due to traffic officer’s directions, as compared to time lapse when traffic officer is not present).

You see, dear reader, the burden of proof is not only on the new science, or new theory or new hypothesis to show a change, but it is a heavy burden to first show the standards by which change will be measured and then presented as illuminating.

There is nothing obvious in dem/lib global hoaxing, I mean warming, except the raging lunacy of pseudo-scientists fabricating fear and catastrophe from lunatics’ imaginations, all done for money.

It is not my burden to provide truth to an existing science. The burden of proof, in science and almost everything, lies solely with the party making new claims or challenging established thought and tradition. The burden of proof lies with those trying to show change. Science is change, measurable change. If it is not measured there is no data, no measurable change and, hence, no science.

Global hoaxing, I mean warming, is the new claim of change, without a shred or attempt to show the change.

I see it this way. When I was a boy, some days when I would arrive at home after school I would walk in the door and smell baking. Imagine I walked in the house, and my mother says, “do you smell that?” Smell what, I ask. “The baking bread, she replies.” No.

“Well, I smell it and it is good”, she claims. Hmmm I do not smell anything.

“No matter”, she says, “will you wash the bread pans please?”

What bread pans? “The ones I baked the bread with”, she she says.

Ok, I guess you see bread pans.

“Of course I do”, she emphatically states, “right there on the counter by the sink.”

Okay, I believe you. Here I am, washing bread pans.

When I am finished washing imaginary bread pans, I sit at the kitchen table and my mother then places an empty plate before me and says, “enjoy the freshly baked bread”.

Okay mom.

In this anecdote, would you think my mother had lost something? Why do global hoaxers try the same with you and I? Are they insane or dishonest?

Global hoaxing, I mean warming, has the burden of proof, and that is why it fails so miserably. There is not even an attempt to provide pre-test conditions, post-test, hypothesis. My mother could have placed store-bought bread on plate, and tried to convince me she had baked it. Without the pre-test conditions: aroma of freshly baked bread, used bread pans and flour on the counter, I am not convinced. The global hoaxing, I mean warming, community, that does not exist except in papers by writers, tries the same. They show nothing with which a comparison, or change can be made.

I come home from school occasionally to the smell of freshly baked brread, and that is a change from the day before, and many days prior. Where is the change in the global hoaxing, I mean warming, claims?

Do we remember our science projects in grade school? The lab paper had a section for observation.

Today’s global hoaxers, I mean warmers, cannot even present “observations”. They make all kinds of claims and protests. Well, they try to present observations but any so-called observations I have investigated are always observations of something else, they claim is connected to itself. They present fear, based upon imaginary dragons fabricated for pseudo-scientists’ financial gain; fabricated by monster-imagining writers.

After the fact observations are nothing if there is no pre-fact observations. The global hoaxers never provide pre-test observations, only claims.

Where are the observations, measurements, standard by which change can be observed?

How can global hoaxers, I mean warmers, make observations without anything to observe, and how can they draw conclusions without anything to observe taken from nothing presented? There is an incredible lack of connection in all this global hoaxing “concluding” without establishing and observing.

Did the morons, for example, observe dying polar bears? Where?

Did the boneheads observe a rise in the sea level of the stick in the rock on the shore? Did the rock move? Did the boneheads move the rock? Who would do such a grievous assault on science, fact and truth itself? Liars, with a political motive. Welcome to global hoaxing!

It is not my responsibility to prove another’s theory wrong, it is the party challenging established thought and tradition that is responsible for proving truth and credibility of his or her claims and theories. Until he or she provides data, measurements, clinical and or laboratory work, the theories remain theories.

The change of scientific belief is not a fact until it is actually factual. All the global hoaxers have is fear, fabrication, and quoting other’s fears and fabrications: all for money.

The NOAA site is a fantasy of global hoaxers, I mean warmers, continually augmenting fear from fear, and from third party fear and fabrication. It is easy to see when they start talking in circles.

Science is proved, often, when scientists and the free market are convinced. I have used the invention of the rifle as an example.

When rifling was first theorized and explained, denying a better flight by a rifled bullet compared to a musket ball was accepted. That is science. After obvious proofs and evidence: observations of rifle accuracy compared with musket accuracy, denying rifles provide a better, more accurate flight, was considered rifling denial. The deniers did not last long. They were killed in the battle lines because they refused to adapt to the science: the proof by observing pre-test and post-test. They refused to change their views to fact and reality.

It is logic retardation that dimwit utardia tries to present nothing to the public as a rational argument. Global hoaxing presents observation-less observations: unsubstantiated claims.

Again, where are the observations? Where are the obvious results, of something, anything, even attempts to lie or deceive?

We are not asking for fear mongering, predictions, models or quotes from others without the necessary facets of science. We want observations and the obvious, nothing else will do. We want IRREFUTABLE science.

ONE OF THE MOST EGREGIOUS LIARS, MAYOR MENDENHALL, TORN TO SHREDS FOR HER LIES

Sorry, lots to cover. This is rough. I may one day get back to it to edit.

Erin Mendenhall is a liar.

Does it matter? Do you appreciate the lies? Why are you reading this?

Some lies are okay? Democrat lies are okay because the end justifies the means? Do you know what that means?

Do you realize the means and ends is comparative to cause and effect, stimulus and response, action reaction?

Let us look at this objectively, if you can. If you are a democrat party supporter or liberal I cannot imagine you will set aside your hatred and decide to learn and change.

You see change is inevitable. Are you changing with change or are you ignorant of change, or fighting change?

Suppose it is an unusually cold winter. Suppose you are experiencing an unusually cold week, and the weather people, family and friends are advising you to travel with an emergency kit for cold weather. For you to prepare in case of emergency, you would have to change, adapt. Can you? Can you sense the given ionformtion, assimilate it, and maybe, just maybe make changes? Would you put your Bermuda shorts away and add additional long sleeved shirts to your travel pack?

I have found that democrats cannot change because they cannot change their thinking. Is that you?

Suppose I am making this up, overgeneralizing, just a little dishonest. Does it matter? Why would it not matter if mendenhall is lying but it matters that I am? The only variable in this equation, to find out why, is you, your thinking. Why do you think your oppositions’ “lies” are of import but the lies you are told by those with a D before their name does not matter? Are you sure they lie to YOU, for your benefit?

I’m not making claims that democrat party supporters are incapable of change, without substantiation, but little detail will be provided. I have covered this innumerable times and exposed thousands of democrat and liberal media lies. If you cannot continue to read and extract valuable information, generalized or specific, that is your first clue that you, YOU, yourself, are incapable of adapting because you will not assimilate information for what it is. It is a further implication that you are your own worst enemy.

If you decide you cannot further read this because it is written by one you consider your enemy, you are absolutely, undeniably unintelligent, and your own worst enemy.

I can tell you the things you need to have with if you are traveling in extremely cold weather. Will you shoot yourself in the foot and remain tough and solid?

A tree that will not bend will break. Which are you?

Sure, you can discount everything by claiming I am conservative and therefore a liar, lying about everything I write. What if I am just a little imperfect at lying, and actually tell a truth? Would you want to miss it?

What if I claimed a certain “leader” is lying? Suddenly I am attacking your perfect position, and there can be no mistakes on your part, especially since you are so smart you do not have to investigate the truth for the truth itself: for tidbits, if nothing else, of information that you can use.

Abraham Lincoln, republican, the great emancipator of slaves, stated he studies his debate opponents twice as much as he studies his own arguments. Is that a good idea because it is a good idea? Or, is it a bad idea because it is a republican who spoke those words? Is it a bad idea, from a masterful debater, who won two presidencies, by debating, because it is a bad idea?

Again, you have to decide if you want to grow and adapt, or remain perfect as you are now. Are you perfect? If you are why are you constantly hoping someone else will legislate gain for you?

I come to my purpose in this commentary. I caught Mayor Mendenhall of Salt Lake City lying.

She lies to those who do not check. She did not lie to me, although she tried. She did not lie to me because I did not let her. I adapted to find the truth.

Those who survive are not the strong, necessarily. They are not bigger, faster or smarter. They are those who adapt.

Politicians change, and change who they serve. What if you liked, agreed with everything your politician says. What if everything your “representative” says and supports benefits you, yourself? What if that politician changes one thing, and you do not like it?

What if that politician has given him or herself, or themselves, absolute power to eliminate, bully, or destroy their political enemies? Suddenly, that is you. This will inevitably one day, be true for you. It may already be, now that biden has declared increases in taxation affecting you. Do you actually think the gains, stolen by inherent and internal inefficiency of government, and by corruption in government, will benefit you more than the losses of taxation increases for inheritance, base deductions, property taxes, general federal income taxes and more? Or you truly believe all the added burdens, already placed, and more to come, all to pay for climate theories, inefficient “new” energy sources, and invading army supply, will benefit you, yourself?

Mendenhall stated she, “As a mayor and environmentalist I support the Energy Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act. We need effective climate action. I hope #SLC’s representatives in Congress will support and co-sponsor this bipartisan bill when reintroduced.”

Her words sound so nice, so concerned, so relaxing and wonderful and full of wam fuzzies that she can stop climate change with legislation, that increases your taxes. Why is that “person” speaking for federal government when she is a mayor?

What is… WAIT? Will you adapt and learn, and then adapt to change, or will you believe the warm-fuzzies of this wicked witch of rhetoric?

What is “Carbon Dividend Act”?

Carbon Dividend Act sounds so cool, true? No, yes? Will you be left in the freezing cold without a jacket because you refused to investigate my warnings of preparing an emergency kit? I lied, remember.

‘Survival of the fittest’ is a misnomer, a fraud. The truth is that it is survival of the adaptable, that provides longevity and life-saving information.

The Carbon Dividend Act is a tax, on you.

There will almost never be energy independence from wind and solar, until the masses are eliminated. Democracy, you underrstand, is democracy for the party. When the wicked witch mendenhall decries “our democracy” she is dead on truthful. Democracy is only for those directly involved. See y other commentaries.

There will be solar and wind energy independence for their democracy only after We, the People have built and have been eliminated, to save their democracy. Mendenhall and all the democrats, liberal media, and the establishment republicans are planning your demise. That truth, when you start to look at definitions, and craftily chosen words and claims, will emerge and you will be liberated, when you look. That truth is found in their own words?

Remember, from the hundreds of commentaries, the thousands of posts on Craigslist, and thousands of claims, I have made, that democracy and representative government are not the same. They are antithetic.

Mendenhall’s lies are astoundingly extensive in the long-standing fraud and seizure of rights and adaptabilities of you and others. She, they, however, in that very definition and description of that “Act” have fabricated some of the best confusion we have seen from the democrat party and its adherents.

I do not have the time or patience to break it down. I have written volumes and volumes of commentaries fighting the climate change hoax, and nobody, not one soul, has challenged me with a shred of science, or even belief. There is nothing to their lies.

Please, search for “Carbon Dividend Act”. Find it on Wikipedia and look at the blue high-lighted links. Follow them and read, learn and prepare to adapt, if necessary.

A simple reading of Wikipedia’s explanation should leave you wondering how the crazy leftists have magically strung contrary words and ideas together to sound smart, or concerned.

Read, and think about the line, “…proposes a fee on carbon at the point of extraction…”.

What is point of extraction? As human beings, made up mostly of carbon, is a tooth being pulled the point of extraction? Why does government take your money?

Ok, point of extraction is nebulous, perhaps, but did you think it? No? Why can you not think for yourself?

My point is not that the tax will be for pulling teeth, although it could be logically interpreted that way, being so open-ended and generalized. Could it be a tax upon extraction from natural resources? You see, it must surely be intended to be a tax when carbon is pulled from the ground?

It would the same as a tax for extraction of pulling those tomatoes off your vines? Tomatoes are mostly carbon.

What is taxation? What is Federal Income Tax?

Is income tax a tax on income?

When and how does a tax on production get a start? Who, what sick monstrously-deceptive and ravaging scoundrels tax production?

Imagine you have a business and you make a product, one of many, but it does not sell. You make many products, and they sell, and your business thrives. You pay taxes on income from the sale of those products.

Imagine a new tax. You produced an item, and then you are taxed on it even though it does not sell. How rotten and evil an idea is that? And that marxist, lying international bolshevik whore, mendenhall, is in favor of taxing you for production?

The principle is dastardly no matter where it is applied.

Mendenhall supports this theft? What a lying piece of rat filth, that bolshevik puppet slut is?

Look at her. She is made to be a heroine by that filth media, also globalist bolshevik whores. Pick a name. Rachel Mad-cow, a bolshevik whore. Little poopie pants Andy Cooper? A bolshevik whore.

Every part of that “bill” is amazingly deceptive and ravaging, you. How dare that filthy slug Mendenhall put on that sick happy, concerned face when she knows how ravaging and destructive to human life and society that bill is! What kind of sub-human filth is in “her” ugly head? This is sedition. This is collusion. This is pure lying filthy evil from a sluttish, slug mayor in bed with international bolshevik pigs trying to eliminate billions of people from existence.

Ok, don’t believe me. Read the United Nations Mission. You are right, I am wrong, they do not want to eliminate everyone, only everyone except the half billion or so, they decide will live. You do not get to decide, being outside of their democracy, who lives or adapts. You have already surrendered your adaptability by being misled to igorance. You cannot even decide if your children will live, taxation on inheritance, already under the scalpel of their democracy. Inheritance taxation, promised to increased, is only one attack on your children, but one evidence they, the centralized democracy, is telegraphing, openly flaunting.

All this attack is being done by bits and pieces. Others would rebel, take to the streets, and hang every single promoter of this ravaging subterfuge of We, the People and OUR country.

All the lies, all the claims the evil democrat politicians make, and you can deny all you want, are in collusion with external “information”, propaganda, lies and forces. There are actually forces of power at wrk to destroy.

The covid scam, supply and demand, cause and effect, stimulus response, is all fear mongering to manipulate you.

Ask the question: How is it that the governors locked American, and Americans, down, out of their own lives, and the federal government suddenly became responsible? How did that happen?

Is it significant? Oh, yes, deadly significant.

Governors have responsibility to the state budget. Governors are quite limited in the acquisition of debt. Debt is slavery. Do not forget that verity.

Debt is eventually and always called in. Debt is delivered, allowed, promoted by lenders so lenders can gain, acquire, profit. Who needs trillions of dollars?

Do not go whacky attacking the rich. This is not the rich. The rich buy and build. I have been a contractor for my whole life. Never, not once, did a homeless person, or broke person, or poor person hire me to work for them. Never, not once, has a homeless, broke or poor person contributed to my acquisition of food and essentials.

And never, not once, has a democrat contributed to my security due to my own capacity to make my way in this world, and NOT be a burden. What contributions, lobbying government to take more from me, have you, dear democrat citizen, made

I am not rich, by no means. I work, drive two old vehicles, and like the majority of Americans, I hope to save so I can one day retire, without reliance on a cheap, self-serving, centralized democracy. Even democrats want that. Unfortunately democrats want more for less.

Covid is a scam. We will never, EVER, EVER be rid of any virus. A virus cloaks and returns.

Our only hope is to adapt. We, the adaptable, will become stronger in resisting viruses. Vaccines weaken the immune system. This is what the global rulers want, and mendenhall, the lying rat, is part of it, regurgitating stupid, deceptive, illogical fallacies to manipulate YOU. Are you afraid? Are you so afraid of only one of millions of viruses that harm you less than millions of other viruses, except when bonded with dangerous chemicals in vaccines and the chemtrails spewing bondable elements and compounds in the air your breathe? Conspiracy you say? Great, who cares. Collusion is the killer. Collusion is the ravager of mankind the sleeping giant of new government genocide, the democrat party and liberal media brought to our, your attention: if you care to look and save yourself.

Mendenhall is partly the source of your fear.

I am not going into any more detail regarding resistance to “disease” or the covid scam.

Read my other commentaries.

Furthermore, Mendenhall openly, blatantly, remorselessly lied about bipartisan being a part of the democrat party “concern” for manipulating you.

She is a filthy lying marxist whore for  globalist tyranny, and she knowingly takes part.

The democrat party, if you have not figured it out yet, is the bully party, the true good old party (GOP), having been around from the founding years while the republican party came into existence to end slavery in the late 1850s.

You have been deceived.

Bipartisan bill, your ass! Not mine, I know the truth.

The democrats, Joe Biden, rammed through, circumnavigating congress, neutering your representatives, to set you up for slavery and slaughter.

Are these two words just a little too harsh? If I make it nice, will you be able to adapt?

If I say it is merely party politics, or if I succumb to the attacks on my free speech and allow the liars and filth to propagate their lies: that the republicans and Trump specifically are mean-spirited and dishonest, does that make it better for you to prepare for slavery and elimination? Identifying the enemy correctly, and the enemies’ plans, correctly, makes it possible for you to actually predict efforts in that direction. Calling it all republican lies does not let you know mendenhall’s association, by her very own words, to the globalist plan to eliminate you, starting with the war on communication. This is Sun Tzu’s principle of war, executed very well by those you trust.

Are you so weak of mind you cannot look at that vampire at your neck, ready to bite?

Are you so weak of mind your poor widdle gwasp of weawity would rather have you let the vampire bite, sending you to an early grave? As long as you do not have to face the reality, the reality somehow, magically goes away?

Are you that childish? Do you have others who depend on you? It is one thing to live in a fantasy world all your own, but another thing yet to take innocent children on your journey of self destruction, with you. They are children. They deserve to be children until they are adults.

Are you a child, perhaps hoping an adult will deliver you?

Are you certain the adults lying to you, increasing taxation, on you, and setting you up to live in fear and ignorance; are you certain they will deliver you, and from whom, themselves?

Again, are you aware that joe’s dictates are needed because the representative process, YOUR representative process, is too slow and needs to be undermined? Are you not aware that this executive dictatorship destroys YOUR representation?

For whom is the process purposely slowed, for you or their democracy?

Mendenhall is a liar and everything she says is a lie. Every claim and promise she/it makes, is a set-up to take you.

There was no bipartisan agreement. There is no climate necessity, and she admitted it, even though she is an idiot and does not know her admission.

The act, which Mendenhall supports, claims it was a bipartisan bill. Bipartisan is congress. Six idiot politicians introducing a bill that the whole rest of congress rejected, is not freaking bipartisan. That filthy marxist whore, mendenhall, that lying whore of global banker/gangsters, mendenhall, knows this. Such filth in that ugly piece of rat-crap head of hers/its, is disgustingly sub-human. How sick can that filth lie like that? Every claim, every sentence she spoke and writes is a premeditated lie.

Hang the bitch! It is them, their democracy, or you and yours!

But this is barely the tip of the totalitarian iceberg.

Cause and effect:

How does carbon output increase temperature? Nobody has ever, EVER, in this bogus tyranny, explained that. If carbon is a pollutant, then clean it up: cause and effect. Sad, thing, for the lying kings of democrat government, including governor Herbert and all the governors, and mendenhall, is that carbon is a necessity of life. It is only a pollutant to those who see mankind as a scourge. Do you see humans as a scourge? You are one of them, us. Do you think democrats will leave you alone, to live, or are they taxing you, proposing taxings on your carbon, yourself, or do you think they magically see a democrat “soul” shining through and give you exception to live and use petroleum products, like they do? Do you think they will allow you to heat your home, wear synthetic clothing, own a plastic phone (petroleum product), wear shoes, sleep in a foam bed, burn wood for heat or cooking?

Where do you think unmanageable debt will take us?

Again, governors created lockdown, they do not borrow from international bankers so they are limited in what damage they do to states, while the federal government, somehow, magically, is in debt for others’ causes; for governors’ fraud, tyranny and surrendering financial independence.

A federal debt that constantly increases eventually rises above the value of the commodity, and that is when the debt is called in. That is the purpose of lending. This is the purpose, the evil purpose of the governors and their asocial democratic marxist whores, to put ALL of America and ALL Americans into financial hock to the globalist banker/democracies. Individual states with accountable governing will not go into international debt. Democrat controlled states have, but some states are free, or have been. The federal debt will take that from those who accepted federal bailouts. It is total debt, now, and all that is needed is for the total debt of America to surpass the total value, and the debt is called in and your money is useless. Your work is useless, your life is unnecessary to the global system, and you are…..

You have been prepared for your own demise, acknowledging that climate crisis, is real, and you are the problem. Will you learn that or be unadaptable, and stupid to death?

Hang the bolshevik bastard governors who have locked YOU out of YOUR lives!. Hang the bastard bolshevik whores, mendenhall, who have locked you out of your lives!

The bill, “The Carbon Dividend Act”, admits that pollution is a problem. The bill addresses taxation to save the planet, YOU, from your own carbon existence.

Hang them all!

97% OF SCIENTISTS AGREE, THE SCIENCE IS SETTLED (A CRAIGSLIST RESPONSE)

10,883 out of 10,885 is not 97 percent.

Written by scientists or dem/libs?

So there are two scientists of dissenting opinions?

Only two? What are their names?

That is so funny. These morons expect people to believe there are two that don’t believe global warming is a hoax?

I thought the number was 97 percent.

If these buffoons are going to lie, at least get the lies close to accurate.

Out of 10,885 “scientists” (laugh), 97 percent would be 10,558.45m, leaving 27 dissenters. Where did the other 25 go? Did they vanish, with the 10,883, or did they not exist to begin with, like the 10,883 global hoaxers, I mean warmers?

Do I seem afraid to look at this objectively, honestly, rationally?

Really, tell us which lie it is, 97 percent of all democrat party-paid scientists agree, or is it that only two don’t agree?

Ask your doctor if paying him or her for services not rendered is right for you. Ask your doctor if paying for services not rendered is right for him or her. Ask your global hoaxer, I mean warmer if your sacrifice but not his/her/its, is right for the planet.

That’s too funny. Such a boring moronic conflict of interest this site has never seen, and it can only come from a lunatic liberal from la-la-land.

10,883 scientists?

What are their names?

That is funny. Really, who are they? Are they nameless fabrications from the lunatic leaps of the lost in la-la-land liberal mind?

Which mind? Who collected the names?

Who did the survey?

Where is the survey information?

Anyone that sponsors a survey wants the information published. Where is the survey?

Where is the publication?

Where is the list of names?

Morons!

Tell us. Is there a list in Scientific American?

Is there a list of names in Popular Science?

Is there a list of names in who’s making money from the dem/lib trillion dollar stimulus?

Anybody that expends that much effort, to survey that many people, certainly knows their reputation and credibility are questionable until the burden of proving their hypothesis is correct.

At the worst they want their information published or it is nothing.

Where is the raw data?

Who are these “scientists”?

Ok, maybe a different approach would work.

Who are the two that do not agree?

Where can we find them?

You see, dear reader, the liberal rats will not even mention their names because we would see a whole community of consistency, opposing global hoaxing, I mean warming.

You can go to petitionproject.org and see the names of the 31,487 scientists who agree, global hoaxing, I mean warming, is a hoax.

Oh, but wait. If we give the loser-libbies, the math retards, another chance maybe we can find the 10,883 lost global hoaxing, I mean warming, scientists that agree.

Petition project.org lists 31,487 scientists. The total is 31,487.

If we add the 10,883 to that number we have 42,372 scientists who believe global warming/climate change is a hoax. Please, serve yourself with rfact, truth, and reality. Go to the site and pick a nam. You will find a real person, while the 10,883 cannot be found, except for a handful I mention in a different commentary.

Of these 10,883 who “believe” in peter pan….I mean never-never land, I mean global hoaxing, I mean, math, a little over 200 of them, actually exist and can be found on the list of the la-la-land liberal 10,883 consensus of science. How solid, is that consensus if 200 of 10,883 exist? Hmmm, let’s do the math, real science:  about 2%.

The consensus is worth about 2% of reality, truth and integrity. That barely meets the requirements for margin of error, much less margin of correct hypothesis or theory, or science.

Boy, this new math by these liberal super intellects, is tough.

In fact, the percentage is not even close. In fact the percentage that believe is less than 50 percent, making the loser libbies, AGAIN, the VAAAAAAAAST minority.

Woo hoo, that’s close to 97 percent, if we take a 300 percent margin of error.

Margin of error: a little tough for poopy pantser utardidiot to figure out. A normal scientific margin of error is about 2 to 4 percent: unless you are a dem/lib peter pan.

Really, he could fly, if he existed. Hmm, existence, kind of a big, important factor.

The loser libbies, taking a mid range margin of error of 3%, are off by more than 33 times a normal margin of error, 33 times as much as their own margin of actuality.

WOW! That is some kind of nightmarish math.

But, tell us why the global hoaxers, I mean warmers, want our compliance.

Tell us why the global hoaxers, I mean warmers, want We, the People to surrender OUR rights and freedoms, OUR hard earned cash, cars and heated homes?

And to whom do they want these things surrendered, to those who have not given up these monstrous planet-killing toxins?

This dem/lib, progressive/bolshevik hypocrisy is deadly when we consider that 300 million Americans could be out of heat for the winters ahead, while the global hoaxing, I mean warming, pigs live lives of luxury and warmth.

It is potential genocide, by a bunch of math-retarded psychos.

And if their math is so bad in plain sight, how bad is all their math?

Maybe the reality is that we have global cooling. Trends, 30,000 scientists, common sense and reality indicate cooling.

Cartoons, fabrications with cool lines and colors, and lies do not make truth.

Fabricating numbers that do not match does not make truth or fact.

Again, who are these 10,883 scientists? What are their names? I crack me up.

Show us the list. How about utardia just show us a reference to the survey or company that collected the “data”?

Who did the survey, NOAA that cannot get the terminology correct? Morons!

Funny.

If I could draw a cartoon I would draw two white, old, men Hillary and moochelle oafama, riding a donkey backwards, claiming they are the 97 percent that “believe” global hoaxing, I mean warming, is an accurate science. The caption would be, spoken by hillary, of course, “we knowed it is currect, because we knowed it.”

Too funny, and of course, being consistent with dem/lib theology, a cartoon that insults democrats, liberals and global hoaxers, I mean warmers, makes the claim true.

Woo hoo. I win!

Yay.

We can all go home now, and turn up the heat, fire up those muscle cars, and throw our dem/lib neighbors into the streets to freeze in the “warm” winters (but not the deep freeze every year in the north east- it never happens).

If we were to stop the political/global elite from heating their homes and driving cars, the carbon print would drop massively. The is a very big return on investment, and we would beat global hoaxing, I mean warming.

YAY. We all win, and the dem/libs get what they want for others, for themselves: that they try to force upon others, not themselves.

NOT on my watch, you filthy pigs!

THE EGREGIOUS, RELIGIOUS FRAUD OF WEATHER REPORTING

The egregious, religious fraud of weather reporting.

Sunday, July 12th, 2020, the national weather service reported a heat wave from California to Texas. Are these people aware that heat waves hit these states every year? Are you aware of it?

Do you know the hottest recorded temperature is in Death Valley California about 60 years ago?

You have to think, please, for a moment? Why did you not question the news that reported highs would be about 10 to 15 degrees above average?

Do you realize that these are two different things? Why does media constantly compare unrelated variables? Are you so stupid to fall for yet another dem/lib/progressive manipulation of YOU?

How can you be so illiterate, illogical, pathetic, and unintellectual? Can you not extrapolate questions from anything? How have you become so docile, mentally, to accept the dumbest drivel, and remain so ignorant you are deftly stupid?

Daily average temperatures are different from average seasonal high temperatures..

The average high temperatures for California to Texas are about the same as they are acrosss the southern states, everywhere. 95 to 105 degree highs are not uncommon for Texas, inland california, even up to Utah.

How is the daily average determined? Do you know or do you just accept that rod of ignorance stuffed up your butt, every day, day in and day out, never ending fraud and hate-motivated manipulation of ignorant YOU?

The report was that these states could expect temperatures 10 to 15 degrees above averages. What a massively, disgusting fraud to toss at YOU.

Do you think, somehow, magically Texas and California, known for hot temperatures, will experience and record temperatures 10 to 15 degrees above the normal highs of 95 to 105 degrees? Do you, in your wildest dumbing-down, not realize that the weather services are trying to convince you temperatures will go to 110 to 120 degrees? How stupid can YOU get, and remain?

And you like, respect, trust and follow liberal/progressive democrat marxists? Do you know what marxism is, or are you totally ignorant of that ravaging ravishment of YOU, as well?

You remain stupid because you want to, and you fool yourself more than anyone else.!