10,883 out of 10,885 is not 97 percent.

Written by scientists or dem/libs?

So there are two scientists of dissenting opinions?

Only two? What are their names?

That is so funny. These morons expect people to believe there are two that don’t believe global warming is a hoax?

I thought the number was 97 percent.

If these buffoons are going to lie, at least get the lies close to accurate.

Out of 10,885 “scientists” (laugh), 97 percent would be 10,558.45m, leaving 27 dissenters. Where did the other 25 go? Did they vanish, with the 10,883, or did they not exist to begin with, like the 10,883 global hoaxers, I mean warmers?

Do I seem afraid to look at this objectively, honestly, rationally?

Really, tell us which lie it is, 97 percent of all democrat party-paid scientists agree, or is it that only two don’t agree?

Ask your doctor if paying him or her for services not rendered is right for you. Ask your doctor if paying for services not rendered is right for him or her. Ask your global hoaxer, I mean warmer if your sacrifice but not his/her/its, is right for the planet.

That’s too funny. Such a boring moronic conflict of interest this site has never seen, and it can only come from a lunatic liberal from la-la-land.

10,883 scientists?

What are their names?

That is funny. Really, who are they? Are they nameless fabrications from the lunatic leaps of the lost in la-la-land liberal mind?

Which mind? Who collected the names?

Who did the survey?

Where is the survey information?

Anyone that sponsors a survey wants the information published. Where is the survey?

Where is the publication?

Where is the list of names?


Tell us. Is there a list in Scientific American?

Is there a list of names in Popular Science?

Is there a list of names in who’s making money from the dem/lib trillion dollar stimulus?

Anybody that expends that much effort, to survey that many people, certainly knows their reputation and credibility are questionable until the burden of proving their hypothesis is correct.

At the worst they want their information published or it is nothing.

Where is the raw data?

Who are these “scientists”?

Ok, maybe a different approach would work.

Who are the two that do not agree?

Where can we find them?

You see, dear reader, the liberal rats will not even mention their names because we would see a whole community of consistency, opposing global hoaxing, I mean warming.

You can go to petitionproject.org and see the names of the 31,487 scientists who agree, global hoaxing, I mean warming, is a hoax.

Oh, but wait. If we give the loser-libbies, the math retards, another chance maybe we can find the 10,883 lost global hoaxing, I mean warming, scientists that agree.

Petition project.org lists 31,487 scientists. The total is 31,487.

If we add the 10,883 to that number we have 42,372 scientists who believe global warming/climate change is a hoax. Please, serve yourself with rfact, truth, and reality. Go to the site and pick a nam. You will find a real person, while the 10,883 cannot be found, except for a handful I mention in a different commentary.

Of these 10,883 who “believe” in peter pan….I mean never-never land, I mean global hoaxing, I mean, math, a little over 200 of them, actually exist and can be found on the list of the la-la-land liberal 10,883 consensus of science. How solid, is that consensus if 200 of 10,883 exist? Hmmm, let’s do the math, real science:  about 2%.

The consensus is worth about 2% of reality, truth and integrity. That barely meets the requirements for margin of error, much less margin of correct hypothesis or theory, or science.

Boy, this new math by these liberal super intellects, is tough.

In fact, the percentage is not even close. In fact the percentage that believe is less than 50 percent, making the loser libbies, AGAIN, the VAAAAAAAAST minority.

Woo hoo, that’s close to 97 percent, if we take a 300 percent margin of error.

Margin of error: a little tough for poopy pantser utardidiot to figure out. A normal scientific margin of error is about 2 to 4 percent: unless you are a dem/lib peter pan.

Really, he could fly, if he existed. Hmm, existence, kind of a big, important factor.

The loser libbies, taking a mid range margin of error of 3%, are off by more than 33 times a normal margin of error, 33 times as much as their own margin of actuality.

WOW! That is some kind of nightmarish math.

But, tell us why the global hoaxers, I mean warmers, want our compliance.

Tell us why the global hoaxers, I mean warmers, want We, the People to surrender OUR rights and freedoms, OUR hard earned cash, cars and heated homes?

And to whom do they want these things surrendered, to those who have not given up these monstrous planet-killing toxins?

This dem/lib, progressive/bolshevik hypocrisy is deadly when we consider that 300 million Americans could be out of heat for the winters ahead, while the global hoaxing, I mean warming, pigs live lives of luxury and warmth.

It is potential genocide, by a bunch of math-retarded psychos.

And if their math is so bad in plain sight, how bad is all their math?

Maybe the reality is that we have global cooling. Trends, 30,000 scientists, common sense and reality indicate cooling.

Cartoons, fabrications with cool lines and colors, and lies do not make truth.

Fabricating numbers that do not match does not make truth or fact.

Again, who are these 10,883 scientists? What are their names? I crack me up.

Show us the list. How about utardia just show us a reference to the survey or company that collected the “data”?

Who did the survey, NOAA that cannot get the terminology correct? Morons!


If I could draw a cartoon I would draw two white, old, men Hillary and moochelle oafama, riding a donkey backwards, claiming they are the 97 percent that “believe” global hoaxing, I mean warming, is an accurate science. The caption would be, spoken by hillary, of course, “we knowed it is currect, because we knowed it.”

Too funny, and of course, being consistent with dem/lib theology, a cartoon that insults democrats, liberals and global hoaxers, I mean warmers, makes the claim true.

Woo hoo. I win!


We can all go home now, and turn up the heat, fire up those muscle cars, and throw our dem/lib neighbors into the streets to freeze in the “warm” winters (but not the deep freeze every year in the north east- it never happens).

If we were to stop the political/global elite from heating their homes and driving cars, the carbon print would drop massively. The is a very big return on investment, and we would beat global hoaxing, I mean warming.

YAY. We all win, and the dem/libs get what they want for others, for themselves: that they try to force upon others, not themselves.

NOT on my watch, you filthy pigs!


The egregious, religious fraud of weather reporting.

Sunday, July 12th, 2020, the national weather service reported a heat wave from California to Texas. Are these people aware that heat waves hit these states every year? Are you aware of it?

Do you know the hottest recorded temperature is in Death Valley California about 60 years ago?

You have to think, please, for a moment? Why did you not question the news that reported highs would be about 10 to 15 degrees above average?

Do you realize that these are two different things? Why does media constantly compare unrelated variables? Are you so stupid to fall for yet another dem/lib/progressive manipulation of YOU?

How can you be so illiterate, illogical, pathetic, and unintellectual? Can you not extrapolate questions from anything? How have you become so docile, mentally, to accept the dumbest drivel, and remain so ignorant you are deftly stupid?

Daily average temperatures are different from average seasonal high temperatures..

The average high temperatures for California to Texas are about the same as they are acrosss the southern states, everywhere. 95 to 105 degree highs are not uncommon for Texas, inland california, even up to Utah.

How is the daily average determined? Do you know or do you just accept that rod of ignorance stuffed up your butt, every day, day in and day out, never ending fraud and hate-motivated manipulation of ignorant YOU?

The report was that these states could expect temperatures 10 to 15 degrees above averages. What a massively, disgusting fraud to toss at YOU.

Do you think, somehow, magically Texas and California, known for hot temperatures, will experience and record temperatures 10 to 15 degrees above the normal highs of 95 to 105 degrees? Do you, in your wildest dumbing-down, not realize that the weather services are trying to convince you temperatures will go to 110 to 120 degrees? How stupid can YOU get, and remain?

And you like, respect, trust and follow liberal/progressive democrat marxists? Do you know what marxism is, or are you totally ignorant of that ravaging ravishment of YOU, as well?

You remain stupid because you want to, and you fool yourself more than anyone else.!



How does one explain the extremely cold winter of 2020 and unusually cold month of March?

I call it Covid-19 distraction. Is anybody talking about oceans rising when the so-called extreme heat is gone and the cold makes the ocean level drop? It doesn’t actually do that, nobody has shown how silly climate-change hoaxing observations connect to unobserved causes.

How do dem/libs explain this unusually, very long cold spell? Covid-19, distraction. Is anybody talking about record high temperatures when we have had years of declining average temperatures, and this spring is the coldest we have experienced in decades? The average daily highs for every day in March were 10 to 20 degrees below average. Nobody has shown how silly climate change observations connect to never shown claims of effects.

How do some people explain the quiet, almost non-existent claims that we, the human race and the world have only 7 years to reverse this “heat” and climate change? Covid-19, distraction from reality.

To most people politics is not involved in everything. Most people cannot accept that there are people who will kill, slaughter, lie cheat and steal for gain. Politicians, the democrats in Congress, exploited a politically-fabricated situation and added a fat juicy raise for themselves and their minions, the unelected, non-governmental agencies and democrat/liberal/progressive institutions the democrats need to feed to stay in power.

Politicians connect all these issues and fools refuse to see how one seemingly unrelated distraction is actually the effect of a different cause from the same source.

Again, it is all politics.

Covid-19 does not exist except where it has been reported and effects of different causes have been used.

Governor Cuomo and “fredo”, his mentally deranged, goofy brother reporter suddenly started telling the truth?

Liars lie, they always lie.

There are numerous links in reporting cause of death.

When a person goes into an emergency waiting room and fills out forms there is a lull, a wait. S person in very difficult situations would be seen as in dire need and rushed to care. A person with a gunshot wound, for example, bleeding, potentially close to passing, is observed and rushed. Covid-19 “sufferers” are not seen in emergency rooms as dire need cases. The “victim” fills out forms and waits, unless of course breathing is difficult, dire need potential of dying.

A wait ensues if there are cases ahead. Eventually a doctor sees the patient but if not in emergency surgery the doctor follows protocol. Asks questions, checks lymph nodes, looks in eyes, ears, throat, checks temperature (usually nurse does that) and prescribes a “cold” remedy. The case is then reviewed and assumed Covid because the doctors are instructed, in many states and regions, to “play it safe”. Play iy safe presumptions are lazy ways of claiming overload and a political agenda. To politicians all things, all issues and calamities are connected. They are connected by politicians’ lies. But, not all politicians lie and see connections. We call these few politicians, representatives.

The third link is follow up. So many have died of covid-19, the claims report, but again, there is never a link shown and the fact is usually just a claim. Have the 8,000 or so deaths, due to covid-19, been proven as a result of covid-19, by autopsy?

The fourth link, hospitalization just in case, just to observe, and assume it is covid-19. LIES presented as physical reality, therefore presented as truth of another infection. LIES, tricks by liars.

All death is by cardiac arrest. Pneumonia causes constricted oxygen flow, and the brain and heart die. The brain can die and the body survive, if the heart keeps pumping. Covid-19 does not cause anything that makes cardia arrest. Covid-19, a ghost virus, is said to cause flu-like symptoms, which means it is a flu. A person who shows signs of carina arrest, and then has a heart stoppage, is actually in cardiac arrest. It is not kidney failure.

How many people in New York city, for example, have not died of flu because it is presumed, by a dishonest politician and his corrupt brother reporter, at a fake news agency, both “working” together (Cuomo brothers) to create an effect they cannot show is actual and cannot show is a result of the cause a handful claim exists?

The CDC can throw a picture of a “virus” and claim it is anything. Who knows the difference? Are CDC scientists like global hoaxing scientists? Maybe they are the same people who present observations and show no connection to an effect they claim exists?

Are people actually dying of this ghost-virus covid-19? No.

Quo bono? Always look for crime where someone benefits. Politicians have America in lock-down, destroying our lives and pursuit of happiness, and they gain, by writing fat raises for themselves and their supporters: fake representative processes they feign.


Has anybody noticed the climate change people are silent? Were they told to stop writing their propaganda? We are in a terrible cold spell. This spells disaster for those who claim our world is heating up.

Are these dictators part of the cover-up of the incoming ice age?

Ok, so I embellished the incoming ice age part. Today, April 4th, 2020, we are heeding warnings across the United States for winter storms, in spring. Record cold periods do not make global warming.

I call it global warming because that is what the lying global writers and fabricators mean by climate change. I call it global warming, and not climate change, because that is what the global hoaxing goons claim is happening, without admitting it is not warming.

All conditions they claim as part of “climate change” are the same conditions they fabricated for global warming. Many years ago the global hoaxers had to disfigure the jargon, the rhetoric (lies) to suit a political agenda: control.

Today the hoaxers claim warming is the effect but do not want it identified as warming. They want you afraid of the planet heating up, but refuse to call it heating. They want the masses to believe there is something evil and sinister causing the climate to change and only the right party can fix it, with the demise and slaughter of the other party, more than half of America.

The scary, nebulous “climate change”, that nobody knows about except the mysterious writer/scientists, can only be controlled and restored with the right politics of burdensome taxation and totalitarian control, by the party of nebulous goals of everything, except politics in their favor.

None of the non-existent “climate change” community, that is actually a writers’ guild of fake science, refers to this nebulous change as “warming, even though it is warming they claim is causing the change. They prefer a more nebulous, generalization of nothing either way, warming or cooling, so they can lay claim to all information as they, themselves being the source, and thus the experts of irrefutable, unchallenged expertise, in nothing, except narcissism and control.

The writers and pretenders claim it is warming causing change but they want you to believe they are not saying it is warming, because the warming cycle cannot be shown to be true. They want the effects of their lies to manipulate the masses without being caught lying.

So the climate is changing, according to their newly found mysterious religion, but warming that produces the effects of warming, as they profess, is not warming, it is change. This is so absurd, and amazingly un-scientific, it is astounding how backward and sub-intelligent they are.

If I could describe it in terms of an ex-friend, who defriended me on farcebook because I disagreed with his regurgitations, I present an anecdote.

The dope, Adam Wills, posted a drawing of a giant wave crashing onto a coastal city, with a caption that “climate change” was going to cause massive destruction. It was a drawing. It was a cartoon showing a wave at least 200 feet high (doubling the height of a building of 10 stories). I asked Ade\am if there was any science to show an increase in wave size and volume, creating a trend that might show an increase in tidal wave sizes that could possibly create that scenario. D’uh?

It is science, math, cause and effect, but that never deterred moronic dem/libs from making silly, unscientific claims. If one observed an increase in wave height over, say, a period of 20 years, one could predict where that trend might carry tidal wave heights.

There is nothing, never has been a study showing tidal wave height change or anything related. The dem/libs have no idea how to design and execute an experiment, or just a study of existing data so to think any dem/lib moron could figure out how to determine whether the 200 foot tidal wave is a cartoon or a real projection, is absolute foolishness.

I could easily design a study of existing data, if it existed.

I would look at tidal wave heights that can be isolated to certain time periods, seasons or reliable and predictable frames.

If data existed that showed a change in tidal wave, or any wave heights, the dem/libs and their moron ghostly writers of non-science, would be all over it, if they knew what to look for: so unlikely.

But, let us suppose data existed for a monthly average wave height in the spring of a northern city that had regular freezes and thaws.

What if that wave height was 22 feet? That would be rare because even the highest waves, that do not destroy towns or cities, or ant farms, anywhere in the world, rarely reach heights over 20 feet. The biggest surfing waves in the world eclipse waves everywhere. Those big waves reach 60 feet, and that is all.

If we notice over 20 years that our 22 foot waves actually increased in height to 25 feet, that would be an increase of 7.33 percent. If that actually happened, or if only a tenth of that happened, .733 percent increase, the global hoaxing community would have a bird, but, what does it mean? Let us take an unheard and impossible amount of increase, at 7.33 parent, over 20 years and extrapolate it until we get 200 foot waves from 22 foot waves. That, this could be considered a scientific prediction: the reason for science.

The next 20 years would produce a 26.85 feet. The following 20 years would give us a wave height of 28, and after 300 years, a foolish projection, based on no real data in existence, would produce a wave of only 60.8 feet. It would take another 600 years to attain a 200 foot wave, if data were correct, or in existence.

Remember, this is a fabricated scenario based on non-existent data and political motivations to control, YOU.

The fabricated conditions are: rising water levels due to melting ice due to increased heat. Reality: it is getting.colder.

Increased drought due to heat. Reality, it is obviously getting colder.

How can we have increased moisture and drought at the same time? Is there another variable, movement, the dimwit dem/lib global hoaxing morons cannot imagine or consider? Unbelievable how sub-intelligent climate hoaxing is. It is astounding how sub-intelligent dem/libs are.

The never shown cause of “climate change” is increased greenhouse gases. Reality: more water in oceans, increased heat, more water for plant life across the world, increased plant growth, increased oxygen output.

All these fabrications unconnected to poorly presented effects are the same whether global “warming” or climate change. So call it what it is, warming, because cooling reverses everything and they want everything tied to heat.

Are the so-called “viral scientists the same “scientists”; the same un-scientific writers and modelers moved from global hoaxing?


REVIEW OF “Variability of Antarctic ozone loss in the last decade (2004-2013): high resolution simulations compared to Aura MLS observations”


This commentary began as a response to a comment on facebook. The comment itself was typical, sub-intelligent liberal regurgitation of a global warming/climate change cliché. A reference was included and I naturally, as always, going to the sources for fact and truth, found the reference and began the dissection.

The following is the reference:


There was a time when I would hesitate to challenge the apparent scientific commentary for fear I might find something solid, such as a credible argument or reference. I, occasionally looked at articles and news reports with apprehension. I am always relived and sorry at the same time: relieved my fears were nothing and the article is a fraud, and sad that there are so many frauds and cheats, liars and ignoramuses in science.

First and foremost I was always relieved that my fellow Americans of a democrat party/liberal bend did not disappoint. As always, the “article”, commentary or report is one lie after another, and, hence, easy to research, dissect and refute. As always, there is no science, very little intelligence and never a truth uttered from a credible or verifiable source.

I am always, naturally disappointed and relieved, again, that any time I look, in fact every time I have searched the sources, I find fallacious, unreliable and unscientific; even silly reporting, references and democrat/liberal stars, who are and say nothing. In this case, I was actually excited to dissect this fake news article. I did a search for the writer and found a “profile”, resume, to use the word loosely.

The following is an edited version of my response on facebook.

Has anybody ever just wondered how they, whoever they is, measured ozone? What scientist went up in an aircraft, stuck a measuring instrument out the window, and observed the ozone layer was less and depleted? Less, compared to what? Who measured ozone 100 years ago, 50 years ago, 30 years ago? 

This discussion of depleted ozone layer began in the late 1970s. What references prior to that time period did “scientists” use to compare, to make the assessment that the ozone layer was less than “before”? When was the before? From the perspective of “scientists” in the 1970s, what references to measurements and data, prior to their claims, so long ago, did they reference?

Who measured anything anytime to enable a comparison? What instrument and mechanism measures ozone? Is it an ozonometer, or speculation and theory? I have never heard of an ozonometer.

The article has two authors. One is the subject of this commentary: Kuttipurath Jayanarayanan.

Jayanarayanan’s profile, resumé, is pretentious from title to last sentence. It is all sophist and rhetorical. It is one overall misnomer: an oxymoron anti-science science cliché after silly misleading-headline cliché. The report itself does not contain a single measurement or explanation of one single aspect of scientific methodology used or employed.

Not only is there no mention of a measurement or data, the report makes no apologies for drawing conclusions about the arctic when the report focuses on the Antarctic. There is not a single measurement in the arctic, but the claim includes both north and south poles. In fact there is actually no antarctic measurement either, just speculation and “models”.

Only someone with no comprehension of scientific modalities would attempt to present conclusions and effects from no measurements or causes. Not a single, “scientist” would attempt such deception.

If, as the study claims, the ozone in the Antarctic is less, or gone, where did it go? Did it breakdown or flow to other locations or planets? Is it possible all the ozone floated to the Arctic? Did anyone think of that? Did anyone check the atmosphere for remnants of ozone moving or dissipating? Is it not curious that suddenly someone, a series of nobody-someone’s, claims there is a hole in the ozone? Is that not like saying, suddenly, we have fewer polar bears when the polar bear population was never counted. Fewer than what?, is the question. Less ozone than what, is the natural query.

Did the ozone float to the Arctic? This is not an odd question, you must realize. If ozone is unique to the polar regions and it is claimed to have disappeared from the Antarctic, where did it go? Ozone surely seeks polar regions. Is it possible it floated to the Arctic? Nobody would know and the pseudo-scientists are so dumb they could not surmise, suppose or think to think. They re so bereft of science they did not even ask the question, what happened to the ozone in the Antarctic? They could not possibly ask the question of the Arctic because they had no idea ozone was there, gone, or ever existed in the Arctic. Nobody measured it, the morons just presumed it was less as well. How silly.

A real scientist would have asked innumerable questions. Try these two: What happens to ozone, does it move or breakdown? If ozone breaks down, to what does it change? Notice that cool word, “change”? Change is life, measuring change is science.

A real scientist would also ask, do we have proof, measurements or data that shows what happens to this theoretical, speculative thing that mystery-scientists call ozone?

I looked at the article, found two authors, and did a search for Kuttipurath Jayanarayanan.

Please, go yourselves and look at the silly resumé/profile:


Notice the “resumé” includes “Research areas”. What is a research area when there is no mention of research?

Next we read more seemingly scientific jargon: “Numerical modeling of Oceans and Atmosphere”

Modeling is not research. As a boy I used to build models too. I don’t know if people realize this, but models are not the real thing. Apparently the “scientist”, Jayanarayanan, or whomever created his “resumé does not know this either.

Modeling? A “scientist” is going to attach his credentials and scientific prowess to modeling? No, never would a real, honest, scientific scientist or researcher do that.

“Numerical” Is that numerical, as in counting? No, not even that. Numerical modeling? Would that be counting, measuring or collecting data? No, numerical modeling would be, either, picking numbers to make a model, or making a model and then counting the fabricated numbers. Either way numerical modeling is a big nothing.

Data would be the results of collecting, measuring, identifying in one way or another numbers from a real thing, not a model.

Numerical counting, not numerical modeling would be actually going somewhere, making observations and notes. When I built models of jets I did not go to the factory to participate in building a real jet. I modeled at home, at the kitchen table. “Numerical modeling? That sounds like sitting at the kitchen table and playing “what if” games. What if I had a job that paid 50 dollars an hour and I worked 40 hours per week? Wait, what if I had a job that paid $200 per hour, and worked 10 hours per week? That numerical speculation sure turned into reality, for everyone. Modeling? Anti-counting, sitting at the kitchen table (or desk), pretending to design something based on absolutely nothing.

So, Jayanarayanan models numerics? Is that, like, taking a bunch of numbers, and arranging them in cool flower shapes or snowflake patterns? Models? He makes models of numbers? I made models of plastic. He makes predictions based on less than anything physical?

Do you see, people, how stupid, childish, and unintelligent these attempts to lie, by pretending to be smart, by throwing impressive words together in a sentence, are? Just that one lie, I mean line, shows a complete lack of scientific knowledge.

The next “Research Area” is, wait. What is a research area? Using scientific jargon would one call a research area, expertise or field? A real scientific paper or resumé would list degrees and certifications. A PhD, for example, in Physics would read, PhD, Princeton, 2017. Papers published would be clearly referenced. One who adds irrelevant or unrelated words to create pseudo impressive titles and longer terms is assuredly trying to deceive.

One of his accomplishments is that he was “declined” 13 years ago? What kind of relevance is someone trying to fabricate? How is declined an accomplishment, relevant or impressive? It is not impressive to scientists. It is a joke to real scientists.

To augment my argument that this ozone speculation is nothing more than theory, further down the page under “Publications: 2015 -2016”, we read the first on the list, “Variability in Antarctic ozone loss in the last decade (2004–2013): high-resolution simulations compared to Aura MLS observations by Kuttippurath, J., Godin-Beekmann, S., Lefèvre, F., Santee, M. L., Froidevaux, L., and Hauchecorne, A. Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 10385-10397 (2015)”

If you read this line of “Publications:” did you notice the word “simulation”?

Jaya…, whatever has a credible resume of speculation and declined awards, based on simulation. Jaya’s “Publications” section is nothing but a lot of sophist, deceptive, manipulation. But, wait for it, the big nail in NASA’s, NOAA’s and Jaya’s coffin is still to come.

I would bet my Corvette Stingray, that Jayanarayanan has no idea he is even on that resumé, or associated with that bogus study. I’ve checked NOAA, IPCC, and NASA for their so-called scientists. I have tried to contact numerous “scientists” and never has one replied or proven to have a research paper accredited to his name.

The next “area” is “Physical Oceanography” What is physical oceanography? Why does oceanography have to be physical? Is there non-physical oceanography? Yes, we call it speculation, modeling, fabrication and make believe.

Would we call non-physical oceanography, theoretical oceanography, model oceanography? Is physical oceanography just simply, oceanography? Why the pretense and sophistication at science? 

The next “area”, “Climate Change and Climate Modeling”

Modeling, again? What is climate change?

We, normal living-in-reality people call climate change, climate. Realistically, considering climate is change, measurable changes in variables associated with the weather and environment, then climate change, as the global warmers call it now, is “change in weather and environment variables change”. Global warming and “climate change” is just plain stupid from the very foundation!

If temperatures, precipitation, and hours of sunlight did not change, it would not be climate. Climate is change in variables. Climate is following seasons and all kinds of cool, measurable variables: CLIMATE.

What is “Atmospheric Chemistry”?  Do we call atmospheric chemistry, just atmospheric change, as in climate? Why the repetition?

The whole profile is one pretense after another.

In response to a fleeting thought I had, I did a search for Meteorological PhD. The search returned a number of results, I picked one for a well known university, The university of Arizona,

“Program/Degree Atmospheric Sciences (PHD) Program Description. The Doctor of Philosophy (Ph.D.) degree is primarily a research degree. The candidate must complete at least 36 units of graduate course credit in the major field, including a core of 6 units of dynamic meteorology and 6 units of physical meteorology.”

Notice the very distinct wording, It is a Doctor of Philosophy program, and a degree in a faculty of Atmospheric Sciences. 36 units of study are required, 6 in the major field, 6 in physical meteorology. Does anyone see goofy wording, such as one finds in Jayanarayanan’s profile?

See how succinct and descriptive all the words in that brief online description are. A “Doctor of Philosophy” in a specific discipline, is mentioned quite clearly.

Again, what is “Numerical modeling of Ocean and Atmosphere”? It is not measuring, collecting data or science in the least. What is it, then?

The big exposé, however, will soon follow.

I like to spend time on the minutia sometimes just to show how childish, silly, unintelligent and manipulative these articles and global warming buffoons are. 

What is a “NASA Post”? What is a doctoral fellowship? Is a doctoral fellowship a doctorate degree? This might be a little unconvincing but try the next part of that point, “JPL/NASA. What does Jet Propulsion Lab have to do with this guy? Wait for it: nothing. It is admitted right up front in the remainder of that “Research Area”, “Caltech, California, USA (declined). 2007. Does declined mean  rejected and ‘did not happen’? So Jayanarayanan was offered a fellowship that was declined? Does this ‘nothing happened’ mean it could have happened except that somebody or something did not offer or did not complete the offer? Maybe Jayanarayanan declined because he wanted to pretend to have a fellowship and wanted to inform everyone he has no expertise or training in JPL/NASA. Not only is this whole thing very unprofessional; not only is the whole thing terribly communicated, but it is so childish one must wonder what grade the creator of Jayanarayanan’s profile finished in public school. Who would be so stupid to make a declaration and then admit “declined”? So, what is the award? Is the award boasting of yet another failure?

We have new information, propagated by the dumbest cheaters of congress today, AOC and a few other morons, that the earth is going to be uninhabitable in 12 years (11 by now). Is her information garnered from “articles”, numerical models and declined credentials from other sources? Yes, this is all the global hoaxers have. All that exists for the liars and cheaters of global control is fabrications, unscientific bravado, and silly childish gibberish. All the attempts to bring the masses to compliance to a global system of taxation and fear, is based on stupidity of a declined fellowship of no consequence, from 13 years ago. In this case, the pretentious science is 13 years old.

I personally like the next comedy sketch. It is so science-ignorant it is not funny. The next “award” is a CNRS Post – Doctoral Fellowship. Did Jayanarayanan get the fellowship? The “award” is so poorly written it reeks of terrible childish, grade-school writing skills. If it truly were a French Award” from a French institution of higher learning, one would expect consistency in the title of the award. The whole name of the university is in English, except for one word in French. Centre is French for center. Somebody knows very little French but thought to try to trick you, dear readers, that this is an institution with some prestige because one word is French.

In French it would be Centre Nationale Recherche Science. According to Jayanarayanan’s profile it is a fellowship for first post-doctoral study. That claim does not coincide with the claims of the “Centre”. Jayanarayanan’s claim is not an accomplishment. If it were it would read something like, Doctorate degree in…

A grant of money to do something may have been “declined”, rescinded, or the dude, Jaya….whatever, probably did not finish. Maybe he did not start. No matter the circumstances, nothing has come of it, making it a nothing, again a pretentious claim.

The biggest evidence of stupidity and non-science is the, “UGC – N ational E ligibility T est L ectureship. Is someone trying to be stupid or confusing? Is someone actually so stupid they cannot check their own work to correct major typos, or are they actually trying to be stupid? Can someone tell us what award it is Jaya…..whatever received when he received an award for being eligible for a test lectureship? What on earth is a test lectureship?

How far removed from any lectureship of an undisclosed topic is eligibility for s test of a state (ship) of an undisclosed lecture? This is a nothing of a nothing of a nothing.

What is UGC? Is it University Grants Committee? Did Jaya….whatever receive a grant, and for what, nothing? Or, as it sounds, he did not receive a grant for nothing.

I could further dissect the silly, sub-standard, mostly incoherent profile and pretentious works of Jayanarayanan but I will move on to other work.

I looked at the CNRS site and found more fabrications from nothing, and again, childish writing and understanding. Eventually I will dissect the simple words of the “missions” of that site.

Until then, I plead with you, dear readers, believe nothing, not even my words in any and all articles and commentaries I write.

Exercise your minds, please. Do more research of Jaya…whatever’s apparent professionalism. Pick a sentence or headline of the profile, break down the words and research the statements for yourselves. Find, for your own mental expansion, the contradictions and silly manipulative attempts found in every sentence and claim of the profile. I must inject there is something very important missing from Jaya….whatever’s profile. He likes holding hands and long walks on the beach. How sweet, and totally unprofessional: another black mark of reality against the totalitarian, global oppressors and plunderers of mankind.

RE: “Scientific evidence for warming of the climate system is unequivocal.” Originally written 6/21/16.

RE: “Scientific evidence for warming of the climate system is unequivocal.”
The following is my response to a post on craigslist in Salt Lake City, June 21, 2016.
In this post the “writer” plagiarizes NOAA with the title of the post and numerous claims throughout.
I write:
Show us the evidence.
What is a climate system? Is dimwit dem/lib talking about a “clime”, or maybe a weather front? These are real terms that reveal real science, understanding, and real knowledge, while “.warming of the climate system…” is at best a non-scientific construction of an alien-structured grammatical mess. Who, what, fabricated this poor collection of words and terms?
Do these dem/libs, fabricating goofy terms and words, think others will wet themselves and follow in line behind simpletons that cannot construct a rational thought?
What is a “…climate system”? What is, “Warming of the climate system…”? Climate is warming and cooling. This dem/lib is speaking in circles to confuse others, and dazzle unsuspecting readers with his/her/its sophistry (look it up).
Scientific evidence? How could there be evidence when there is no data? Where are the volumes and pages of lists of university studies by PHD students submitting their theses?
Where are the measurements, data? Evidence is non-existent without data and a measurement or two. Anyone can pick a topic, go to a library, look up in the indexes for studies done by PHD students on almost anything. This is cutting edge stuff. Anyone can go to the library, look up climate topics and find numerous studies showing the temperatures are dropping.
Suppose I make a claim to illustrate my superior knowledge.
“I know a yard is longer than a meter”, I state.
“How do you know?”, you ask. I reply. “I just know.”
You press, “how long is a yard?” I say, “pretty long, the evidence shows it.” You ask, “how long is a meter?”
I reply, “almost as long as a yard.” You think you have me so you ask me, “If you are comparing the two, how can you know one is longer than the other if you cannot actually compare them. How can you know anything about either measurement if you refer to no studies that compare them, and if you cannot define how long either is?” I reply, “I just know it, the evidence is there.”
Anyone, at this point would ask, “what evidence?”
Besides the fact that I would be dead wrong regarding a yard being longer than the meter, one could also note I totally rejected scientific methodology.
A meter is a full yard plus 3.6 more, MORE inches, making a meter longer than a yard. That is a comparison using a common standard of measuring, to compare the two. This qualifies as data applied. Using one or the other as a standard, and then comparing, would be considered data.
You ask me again, to explain the comparison between the two, and how I can make a comparison without actually comparing variables; without common measurements or data to compare. I reply, “scientific evidence for measuring the measure of a longer yard than a meter, is unequivocal.” At this point you realize you are talking to an uneducated, egomaniacal moron, just as we, the educated and honest conservatives try to communicate with dem/libs, living in “I am special in liberal la-la-land.”
Using an inch to measure two “systems”, and then comparing, we see that a meter is longer than a yard, but a dem/lib would argue against that, if it meant he or she could propagate government stealing from all to give to the dem/lib frauds and liars.
Where is the science? This pseudo-science, injected presumptions played as credible facts, from dem/libs, is almost laughable.
Where is the data? Where is the hypothesis, the theory, the study parameters and interpretations of data? Where is the comparative unit of measure? These things are real characteristics of real science, and the dem/libs haven’t even got a clue how far from real science they are. Lying has a way of making one stupid. In essence, as mom and dad taught us, dem/libs are only fooling themselves.
There is absolutely nothing credible from the bogus sites because everything is a fabrication.
Everything from liberals is just like my little brother, in third grade, “this guy I know…”, trying to fabricate credibility from a lie. Then he would ramble on to fabricate false truth and “science” to suit his goal, hoping to convince us to give him our money or whatever he wanted.
Notice too, that NOAA is a .gov entity. Government is part of this? Now there is a source for total dishonesty. Why do dem/libs pick and choose which lies from government they want to believe? Are dem/libs so lost in la-la-looney science land that they think it is okay for government to lie as long as it is only lying to conservatives and smart people? The average democrat is at least 10 IQ points below the average republican. Democrats have the uneducated Mexican/muslim vote to factor in their averages. I rest my case.
The fact is that more republicans graduate than democrats. How many Mexicans, do you know, that graduated from college? Do you know just one? The big fraud the democrats proffer is that Mexicans, invaders and the dregs of mexico, work hard, vote, and are recipients of higher education. Such stupidity, claims connected by nothing except dem/lib lies, is hilarious.
Mexicans in college? How is that possible when the morons cannot even speak English? Who is more ignorant, the Mexican or the dem/libs that persist with bogus claims that are so easily refuted a third grade Mexican him or herself could refute the “lies”?
Remember this and you will know the liberal/progressive/fascist mind: they always want something for no contribution of their own but boast of two things: what they plan to contribute and what they plan to force others to contribute.


RE: “publius piglius” A response to a Stephen Hawking “Report” on Craigslist, Salt Lake City, November 6, 2016

What a mess of a being, utardia. What a lying piece of dog crap.

Nothing that moron writes is true.

Hawking said nothing about Trump. Hawking is a scientist, actually not a scientist, a theorist. He is not a political commentator. His “intelligence” does not spill over into other areas because he does not exert any effort in anything else except imagination and science fiction.

Utardia/whatever’s first line, first lie.

No, not a lot of people consider hawking to be the smartest… some do, maybe. How many think what bolshevik-dick claims, is a lot, 70 trillion, 70, 3? Is it a matter of percentage? Is 3.3 million a “lot of people”? 3.3 million represents one percent. Can dick not think in terms of context?

Hawking’s theories are theories. There is no science to theory until there is experiment.

Which Tuesday did Hawking, allegedly say these things? This moron, utardia, cannot even get logistical facts right. Utardia/whatever writes that, ”So it’s understandable why, on Tuesday, people sort of freaked out when….”

This comment by urardia has been posted and reposted and reposted and reposted, over and over and over for months.

There is no date, not even the month or year. If you google this it does not exist.

No date, just a fabrication with an intentional evasion of a date, to hide the fraud, and thus the second sub-sentence, the conditional, that people sort of freaked out, is a lie as well.

That’s great. Moronicus/maximus, utardia/whatever, got two lies in one sentence. He/she/it is getting worse. Pardon me, he/she/it has been worse for a long time.

One would think this moron would eventually learn. Dangling and misplaced modifiers makes his/her/its sentences whacky and contradictory.

Is Trump’s rise due to his non-existent interview with British News Station ITV NEWS? According to moron utardia/whatever, it is the connection. Does this moron try to connect these “things” purposely?

Everything is a fabrication.

Here we go again, ”Human caused climate change”, allegedly spoken by non-scientist, non-political commentator, on a non-day, non-month, non-year in a non publication. Wow, do you, dear fellow American actually believe anything dick writes?

One might be able to ascribe some sense to a statement Hawking did not make if it wasn’t so uproariously whacky. 250 degrees? The temperature of the planet is going to increase 250 degrees because of CO2 breaking free of another nothing at the bottom of the oceans? That is just stupid. I mean, laughable stupid stooooooooooooooopid. Is that utardia/whatever actually this stupid? Even Hawking’s goofy theories are not as stupid.

If Hawking is so smart maybe he can explain what is holding, binding large amounts of CO2 on the ocean’s floor? Is it mud, because we have mud everywhere? Is it silt, because we have silt everywhere? Is it sand, rocks, whale poo, because we have all that everywhere?

Mr. “scientist” needs to explain such a crazy theory. Oops, did I mention theory? Did I actually use that word “theory”? Did Hawking do an experiment or theorize? Did Hawking, or whale-poop brain utardia/whatever go to the bottom of the oceans, EVERYWHERE and find trapped, bound, CO2 in massive amounts, and measure it, or is that theory too?

But wait, the interview did not happen, on a television station that does not exist for a pseudo-theorist to comment on something for which he is not an expert, in a world where Hawking does not venture.

So the theory must be looney toony utardia/whatever’s imagination: utardia/whatever’s sci-fi fantasy, another hate-motivated fraud.

So Hawking made no such statements or theories. Hawking has not been to the bottom of the oceans; in fact nobody has.

Hawking, Trump, the British Prime minister, Utardia/moronicus/whatever has not been to the ocean floor, and nobody, ABSOLUTELY NOBODY HAS BEEN TO THE OCEAN FLOOR.



The greatest danger to mankind is liberalism. Liberalism (democrat party eugenicists and maniacs) is the biggest promoter of big, centralized government.

The world is a history of big, centralized government, and big, centralized government causing wars, murdering people, and being the sole cause of genocide.

Hang that filthy slob utardia/whatever, for treason.

This dem/lib/progressive propaganda is murder and genocide-in-the-making.


Inconsistencies in dem/lib/progressive/eugenicist propaganda regarding global warming.

I do not use that word, propaganda, lightly.

To propagate something is is to create propaganda, but specifically, the unspoken meaning of words, particularly, the word “propaganda” is that propaganda includes an element of deception.

The panacea of global warming is a massive fraud.

To apply “global warming”, or the new co-option, “climate change”,  as the cause for almost everything that the propaganda agents fabricate, is to defer the scientific method, finding cause of effect, and making change. It is tantamount to using a nuclear weapon for a mosquito problem.

First of all, global warming is undefined. It is indefinable, by design. It is an over-generalization meant to cover everything the dem/lib/progressives decide to control.

No matter where we go; no matter what we read or hear, global warming “specialists” pop up with indictments for nothing but fabricated causes, unrelated results and completely disconnected solutions.

On craigslist rantsandraves, in Salt Lake City, one liberal “writer” continues to accuse every incident of weather and democrat party distrust and rejection, on the big bad wolf of global warming.

The big bad wolf, of lore, was never a wolf. What was the wolf? What is the wolf?

The vampire, the killer in the myths does not exist. There never was a vampire. There is no such thing as a vampire (well, except democrat politicos sucking the life and blood out of America). Democrat politicos and liberals is the closest thing to a real vampire in existence. I am tempted to state boldly that even democrats are NOT vampires per se, but who knows for sure how many lives the clintons have personally taken. Maybe they have even drunk the blood of their victims. The big bad wolf is a metaphor but vampirism and satan worship are not myths.  Even though satan the being may not exist as myth claims, Satan worship is not a myth. Vampirism is not a myth either. Histories of 

I remember a picture of butcher-billy-bob clinton hugging a woman in Kosovo. The story is that she was part of a blood sacrifice the following evening and clinton, master mahan clinton, did the sacrifice.

Our local utardia, moron blames everything on global warming, but that does not solve the problem.

It is not intended to solve fabricated problems, proven simply by the fact that the dem/libs offer only political solutions to problems that do not exist. The big bad wolf is a fabrication placed in the minds of unsuspecting victims by others, those who want control of the victims. How are the victims identified? The solutions are never problem related, indicating an agenda supra to the fabricated problems of global hoaxing.

I could refer to an innumerable examples dem/libs present for which the causes are amazingly disconnected.

Our local moron, not so local, an agent working Utah and other locales, admittedly, living over 2,000 miles away, posted an article on Stephen Hawking stated, to paraphrase, ‘the release of CO2 from the ocean floor would elevate temperatures to about 250 degree’.

Who is responsible for that CO2 release? How is that CO2 release my problem or a result of my actions, in any way? Yet, the monster fabricator claims I need to submit to democrat party rule with no cause-and-effect connection: no reason why. How are these two entities related? Obviously, and logically, they are not, but in the minds and fabrications of dem/libs they are related.

They are related by effect but not cause. They are related by the effect of extracting my compliance using a tool of rhetoric, deception, or outright fraud, whichever you want to call it.

it does not matter what cause the dem/lib frauds use, the effect is always submission to democrat party/liberal rule. I am not talking about submission to democracy, or rule of law. I am not making a reference in the least to submission to or participation in Constitutional Republic, self-governance.

When I use the word rule, it is more closely associated with tyranny, despotism, dictatorship, and murderous oppression. This is what the dem/libs offer. If it is not obvious by their use of words, it must obvious in their avoidance of words such as Constitution and representation, and terms such as rule of law, self-governance, and Bill of Rights.

The effect is always centralized rule, taking away our rights to individual decision making and individual opportunity.

The big general “global warming” hoax is designed specifically to give tyranny an excuse to oppress and rule. This is slavery.

But where are the connections to the problems? There are none. Returning to the example of the Hawking claim that the earth will experience 250 degree heat, and doing some research, we discover Hawking never made that statement. In my search for that claim I found no reference by Hawking, at all, to global warming. Hawking, being a scientist, or at least a mathematician, could not, in a scientific vein of integrity, make such a claim.

Surely Hawking understands scientific methodology of proving or disproving a theory or hypothesis.

Surely Hawking would know that an immeasurable CO2 quantity at the bottom of the ocean could NEBVER be traced to the effect dem/libs continually propagate: democrat party rule without opposition or dissent.

What is the actual cause of this fabricated CO2 release?

Why does the dem/lib effect only include a deflection from the undefined problem, the cause of CO2 release? Why does the dem/lib effect avoid the cause of this mysterious CO2 build-up, and the necessity of compliance to democrat party compliance? Is there a real cause or is it a causal claim only?

Should we define the problem of global warming we might be able to attack the causes.

Sticking to the posted, fabricated claim, what is the cause of CO2 release?

If it were dry ice sinking to the bottom of the oceans, releasing CO2 that binds to sediment or rocks down there, then how could we stop dry ice from sinking to the bottom of the ocean, and where and how is this dry-ice created and transported to the ocean? If dry ice were transported to the oceans, would it not dissolve on the way? Why an how does CO2 get to the bottom of the oceans and from where did it spring into existence. The idea that CO2 can be released from the bottom of the ocean is not as far-fetched and ludicrous, lunatic in fact, as to how the CO2 got to the bottom of the ocean? Is CO2 a gas? Does a compound in a gaseous state not rise in water?

Do not expect logic in anything the global warming/climate change writers fabricate. Yes, I used the word writers. I have not found a scientist doing an experiment or measuring a thing related to climate or weather in any of the articles I have dissected from IPCC, NASA, NOAA, AAAS, WMO, or other related pretenses.

What has caused, if we assume even the most insane fabrication to be exemplified, the “gathering” or build-up of CO2 on the bottom of the ocean? Can the pretentious, deleterious effect be reversed? That would be a start to cause-and-effect science and problem solving. But the dem/libs do not want their fabricated problems solved. If they did their claims would include measurements, data and and presumptions, such as one would find prepared as a theory or hypothesis. Nothing is ever forthcoming, except attacks and emotional manipulation.

They do not even want their fabricated problems discussed, hence the deflective and childish ramblings from the discussions.

But let us take this pretense even further. Suppose there actually is a build up of CO2 on the bottom of the ocean: setting aside the deceptive and manipulative impossibility spontaneously springing to threatening proportions,  by this utardia traitor. Suppose we set aside the insanity of claiming something for which there is no data and something for which data cannot even be acquired; what is the cause and how can it be reversed, if that is the goal? 

When global warming is broken down it is obviously not about reparations to the planet.

CO2 emissions from the ocean floor are going to cause 250 degree temperatures, according to global hoaxers pretending to quote Stephen Hawking. HOW?

According to scientists pretending to listen to a fellow “peer-reviewed” guy, pretending, the ocean floor will release CO2 and will cause major catastrophes, 250 degree temperatures are not life threatening, rather life terminating, immediately. Who went to the ocean floor and ensured CO2? Who discovered a change in CO2 levels on the ocean flor? Who measured change, and developed a pattern showing an increase oi CO2 levels of ocean floor pretense? Who did anything, except manipulate fear to force compliance to a ghost on the bottom of the oceans?

The problem; the weird thing about this impending catastrophe, is that CO2 emitted is the earth’s problem, not mankind’s problem. I thought the whole global hoaxing challenge was to stop man’s destructive impact on the climate, but CO2 escaping from the ocean floor, as Hawking states (or is falsely accused) cannot be directly, oddly or even mysteriously connected to anything mankind or any person may have done, especially to such a degree as to affect the whole world.

If so destructive, so potentially devastating to end all life, why are scientists right now, not trying to stop the devastating effect? If 250 degrees is projected, as the dem/lib hoaxers claim, then that is the biggest problem in the world, not man. Will global hoaxer utardia rally mankind? What scientists are addressing this sacrosanct event and who is doing something about it, or is it silly? Maybe we should make a hundred billion tons of concrete and pour it in the oceans to seal the bottom of the ocean from releasing CO2?

The insanity is that the dem/libs are doing what tyranny always does, and they want the same results: total control of all people. There is nothing new to tyranny’s cries for unification to fight an unseen enemy, along with massive surrender of rights and wealth to the criers.

They, the global inciters, hope you, We, the People forget that we are being led to do the same things others in other civilizations have done in the slide to slavery.

We are given only drips of information so we can be convinced the science is there but invisible and/or difficult because of the slow acquisition of data and knowledge, that never materializes.


How sad. Except that is not the Muir glacier.

I also did search for Greenpeace in Svalbard. Never happened.

End of story.

There are no United Nations scientists. Can psycho (craigslist utardia) name one? No, never has, never will. Utardia (The pig-shit eater) has tried to fool us that a few names here and there, of people in universities or notable positions, are scientists, but they are not. It is that simple. Check for yourselves, as I have.

There is no scientific global climate community. There are a few writers that lie and post pictures of things other than they describe. There are a few reporters in far away countries that cannot be reached to confirm they are even distantly associated with the global hoaxers. There are frauds that allow their names to be used and there are numerous others who have no idea their names and identities are being stolen and used by the few, unidentifiable writers of global hoaxing.

Like I have stated before. The writers of the articles and “warnings” on NOAA, AAAS, WMO, climateandsecurity.org, and some of the “dire warnings”, are writers, and that is all.

The writer of craigslist posts, “Missing signs of climate in an epic flood”, and, “Scientific evidence for warming of the climate system is unequivocal.”, is the SAME “person”.

When I write that there is only a few “people” writing these articles and fabricating the innumerable lies, it is quite possible it is only one “person”

Look at the syntax, the vocabulary, the odd sentence structure of all these articles and posts. It is one source only. The global hoaxing community is a handful of lying dem/libs. That’s it. That is all there is to this “community”.

Even the moron that posts here in SLC simply copies and pastes from his/her/its own weird and disjointed, fraudulent fabrications already posted on one of these sites and from other CL locales. In addition, everything is a lie.

Again: one study; one experiment by a legit scientist; one piece of data; one measurement; one bloody hint at someone doing something even closely related to the scientific method of proving or disproving an hypothesis; maybe a formal hypothesis or a wonderment by a real scientist in a real scientific publication: any of this might lend 1% credibility to the bogus, ABSOLUTELY BOGUS, FABRICATED CLAIMS OF THIS MORON AND HIS/HER/ITS RAMBLINGS ON THESE NON-EXISTENT-SCIENTIST SITES.

There is a Muir Glacier in Alaska, but it is classed as a Little Ice Age glacier. It started retreating in the 1780’s. Yes, it is well documented that the retreat was caused by automobile exhaust, in 1780, from utardia’s clap-trap-yap. Greenpeace rode the waves into utardia’s mouth to actually do the research. It is documented at: utardiaisabuffoon.org

Ice age glaciers melt.

Ice melts, in case that moron has forgotten that ice is frozen water: H2O, dihydrogen monoxide, a deadly substance responsible for thousands of deaths in the U.S. every year. It should not be inhaled.

If Greenpeace has no reason to “document” a Little Ice Age glacier doing what Little Ice Age glaciers do, MELT, then where is the significance in anything true about this glacier? There is only significance when utardia and the lying liberal extremists fabricate fear to manipulate the masses. Revolutions kill people. That is what these disturbed, ethically-retarded dem/libs want.

The fraud and deception of this absolute butt-hole, lying cretin, utardia is unbelievable.

I have made some strong accusations and solid arguments but this bumbling boneheaded, biscuit brain cannot even rebut one. Moronic supremicus has not even tried.

Brent 3,209, utardia 0.

Has this moron no pride, no sense, no conscience?

What a moronic loser. Probably the geekiest whimp in school voted least likely to grasp reality, and voted most likely to become even more geekier.

What a loser.

A real question is, will this moron respond with something concrete to prove he/she/it is even human; has a job; or actually lives on this planet?

Really. I am quite cautious to not give away my personal information, having received scores of threats. I can beat any and all of them, but even I, supremicus, intelligentsi-smart-assius, lets my guard down and could be ambushed.

I have stated that I work, I live in the Murray Utah area, stop for coffee at Barnes and Noble in Murray, while this moron is nothing but an ethereal paper science fiction plagiarist. There appears to be nothing personable about this simpleton, utardia. He/she/it admitted he/she/it is over 2,000 miles away, assigned to work this area, and then tried to recruit me to silence me and raise the average IQ of all the dem/libs by 10 points. Raising the IQ of all dogs in the U.S., by adding my intellect is less of a gain, since dogs have higher IQs than the average dem/lib.

Seriously, kidding aside, this bolshevik agent tried to recruit me, telling me he/she/it could show me how to make money doing what I am doing. What a scum. Turn traitor for association with that pissy-pants wimp?

How sick would I have to be to do that? How desperate to be something, other than human, would I have to be to do the disgusting propaganda work of a treasonous bastard!

How does one describe such a sub-human with absolutely no potential for acquiring human characteristics? How does one; how can anyone, describe a thing that simply cannot tell a single truth, trying to deceive and manipulate others to believe the most insane, ridiculous, whacky, illogical, child-id mental-displacements?

How does one describe the evil of hatred for mankind in this moron’s mind that makes him/her/it lie with every statement made, to deceive and manipulate others to join the irrational world of liberal dementocracy? How does one describe this moronic state of languoring in liberal dementia-land?

So Obama’s (our) trillion dollar stimulus money was very poorly spent, paying an idiot/super geek to become a worse idiot and liar.

My gawd, how stupid does that make oafama sin laden?


As Arctic ice melts due to the NORMAL heat of SUMMER….

What a moron, utardia, writer on Craigslist.

Colder summers, colder winters, earlier falls, later springs, adds up to global hoaxing, not global warming.

They call it “climate change” now because if they had to call it “warming” they would have to defend their positions from everybody who knows the trends are cooling. They could call it pollution, what it really is, and that would direct resources to solve the real problems. As it is, the global hoaxers have no concerns for the real problems and real solutions: solutions that are definitely needed. They are more interested in compliance, oppression and control of We, the People, and lining their pockets as ignorant, deflective “expert” liars. They have the midas touch of turning other’s wealth into their own, by stealing through government. 

Global hoaxing is protectionism, the root of all tyrannies.

We are going into an ice age. Let us see if I can whip up the same fear and manipulation using the same tactics as the dem/lib hoaxers. I predict, in keeping with modern trends, that the earth will be in an ice age by  2750 ADHD. We can expect -300 degree temperatures and almost all life on the planet will be eliminated. We can expect to wake up very cold in the mornings, and when we look out the windows, we will not see the missing climate signals, that utardia left for our future use in 2750 ADHD.

When we look at the star placed above the squiggly lines and cool colors on my global hoaxer numbers chart x-axis versus un-measured temperature increases, on the y-axis, we see a really cool depiction of a pyramid. YAY, just what we wanted. It is quite pretty although there is a spot where we will have to change the results of our studies to make that left line a little straighter. Welcome to liberal la-la-land, global hoaxer-ville.

Most global hoaxers are so science-deficient and challenged they forget to leave one or the other axis off their “charts” and”graphs”. It is like not knowing enough to add flour to bake bread, and then claim it is baking. We witness, in every chart, claim, “news” report and post  more goofy fabricators left off their charts and science-ish models and projections.

Stephen Hawking was interviewed. When asked about climate change he stated, and I quote, “that utardia/scum-puppet, is a moron.”

It’s true. I read it in a “paper” about a consensus of scientists that consensussed together, panelling together to make a consensus of papers that claim the papers are consensus, regarding some scientists, a community of 32 million, that claim Stephen Hawking said just that.

This satire is probably much clearer to you, dear reader, than anything from utardia/scum-puppet/ weird dave/editor/predator, NOAA, WMO, NASA, and AAAS. We are wild and crazy global hoaxers, I mean guys.

Please, fellow Americans, lighten your lives with humor. Go to the aforementioned sites and read, from a perspective of science, the “stuff” they fabricate.

Imagine you are in your high school chemistry class and the lab instructor is introducing a lab experiment. Compare that experience to the fluff and stink of the sophist, pretentious, fraudulent words of the aforementioned sites.

I have made commentary, but I cannot cover it all.

Hawking continued, being the pure scientific mind he is, “All the evidence shows the earth is cooling, heat is escaping the planet in buckets, and I predict minus 100 degrees at the equator by 2750 ADHD.”

No, really, it is true. He actually said that. He consensussed with other global anti-hoaxers, in his usual scientific jargon. lol. Don’t you love, it, buckets? Funny?

Not much different than looking for missing climate of the Louisiana floods. Utardia concocted, “Searching for climate signals…”.

When was the last time “that thing next door, named climate, sent a signal? Was that his order by phone for pizza delivery?

“Climate signals”? that is too funny. 

Didn’t that moron utardia quote some source, hmmmmm, Hawking, who predicted 250 degree temperatures, like Mars, by 2050 because of CO2 emissions from the bottom of the ocean floor?

Is utardia that much of a moron!

When was the last time Hawking was on the ocean floor? When was utardia/political scum-puppet on the ocean floor? When was the last time anyone was on the ocean floor? When was the last time a god, was on the ocean floor, I mean except when he put frozen CO2 ice cakes down there, 250 billion years ago. Was utardia, that moronic dinosaur around then?

How much of fools does utardia take We, the People to be?

That mutt, for that presumption and morose attack on reality, deserves to swing.

It just takes one judge to issue a bench arrest for anyone of the thugs in power. We, the People will rally. We have seen it.

It just takes one!