A source that presents limited choices is characteristic of governing done without consent of the people. Limiting choices is characteristic of institutionalized ignorance. Media and government that proffers a narrow field of causes for effects is not government for the people, by the people and of the people. It is tyranny.
The mainstream, dementocrat/progressive, bolshevik/banker media presents two options regarding the battle for Kiev. Why only two?
Simple economics of tyranny: create a dichotomy and control both sides.
This tactic of limiting options is typical liars’ manipulations.
Where is the best place to learn to swim, the deep end or the shallow end? Neither. The best place to learn to swim is on deck or at a waterfront on the shore.
Argue if you must, it is just anecdotal for sake of illustrating how easily it is to control discussion by presenting apparent opposing views.
Were you so easily tricked? Did you believe me when I presented only two options? In how many “NEWS” articles and rules and laws are you presented a narrow choice of options, and thought? Thought is what it is all about. Thought leads to actions, especially when emotion is attached. Rulers, media knows this but you don’t think about it enough to save yourself.
My swimming anecdote could be argued but the point is that those who try to limit your mental comprehension, your intellect, basically, do it to exploit you.
Was the battle for Kiev a feint, as some media arguments claim, or was it a failed Russian objective? Was it a failed feint?
The corrupt controlling media, has given only two options; two opinions or two and only two scenarios, here, as in almost everything.
In fact, one could say it is a sign of deception when media controls discussion with only two dichotomies.
Let us take the immediate, obvious flip-flop of the corrupt media claims.
Was Kiev a failed objective? The opposite has, again, at least two perspectives: failed, or not an objective at all.
What if the opposite of the claimed “report” is true, that Kiev was a successful operation? Were the Russians truly trying to take Kiev? The narrow narrative of the corrupt, political, mainstream bolshevik media declares it
Was Kiev the objective? If the corrupt hate-stream media claims Kiev was the objective, then it was not the objective. The corrupt media cannot tell a truth.
The other “report” is that Kiev was a feint. The criticism then is that it could not have been a feint because it was too costly. Who says it was too costly?
If it was a feint, for what was it a distraction? Do you think mainstream media would reveal the real objective?
In all this, there are many perspectives and variations, none of which the mainstream, dementocrat/bolshevik/banker media can allow to be known.
It is established that the CIA was operating in Ukraine. See my article:
THE RUBRIC OF LIES AND FABRICATIONS… PART 6
But wait, you say. If I just mentioned the mainstream media lies about everything, surely it is a given that the mention of the CIA being in Ukraine is also a lie.
Sure, but how?
There are many ways to lie.
The corrupt media has only a few tactics that deflect, distract, and deceive. They have to provide a mix. When only one tactic is used it is easier to spot patterns.
Disclosure of truth, always limited and with a necessary amount of deception and sophistry is the tactic used here.
You see this sophistry of admitting slight mistakes in judgement or interpretation, and then re-asserting the commitment to the original claim is given greater credibility because the reader assumes an admission makes the source honest.
We see this all the time in global hoaxing, I mean warming.
The writers, not scientists, create new terms and make up words and twist meanings, all in a context of fake science and decorum. The perfect example is the word “liberal”.
Liberal has the same root as liberty, but total government control, the new liberal of many decades, has very little commitment to liberty for all. Total, centralized government control is the opposite of the word liberty, and even more egregiously opposite of the root of liberal, but it is the new word today for the opposite, and it fools people.
It fools people to follow false narratives of totalitarian control, while people feel a false sense of security believing they are “liberal”, or free-minded and open -minded, when they are exploited and ignorant drones.
Just being unaware of the words liberal, liberty, and the common root, liber, is a degree of ignorance the corrupt media and the bolshevik/banker dementocrat party have fashioned for much of America, and the world.
My estimate is that the assault on Kiev served a number of purposes: 1) chemical warfare labs and nuclear installations and stockpiles were located close to the Capital, Kiev, and were either destroyed or dissembled.
While feigning an attack on Kiev, they actually attacked parts of Kiev, and took their objectives. Or, the corrupt media called the attacks on industrial areas and parts of greater Kiev an attack on Kiev itself, again, to distract from truth that there were very well defined objectives. An accurate look at parts of Kiev hit, not to be expected from corrupt bolshevik media, would show patterns of concerted effort by the Russian military.
I am beginning see a strategy emerging but cannot say for sure yet. When I can I will let you know.
No doubt one of the ways to distract from what Russian military objectives might have been is to distract with emotionally charged “NEWS”.
Was Bucha, close to Kiev, a depot for labs and installations of chemical weapons?
Consider the photos and impression you have of Bucha. Do the images of Bucha remind you of a small town, with a main street and one set of traffic lights? Is that really Bucha or the impression the corrupt bolshevik/banker media wants in your mind? And why?
The crime, not reported, is not that Ukraine and the corrupt U.S. government, through CIA operatives, had been planning continued and increased assaults on Russia
The alleged crime followed to distract and manipulate public sentiment, focused on alleged criminals given no presumption of innocence, no defense, no cross-examination of accuser, and no voice to present a smidgeon of truth.
No, the crime was created after the fact by fifth column agents, probably the corrupt-to-the-core CIA agents sent to slaughter people who knew the truth of Bucha.
The accusation of alleged crimes against humanity, allegedly executed by Russian forces has absolutely no backing or evidence. There is no way the Russian military carried out any crimes against humanity, and not a single person has firsthand knwowledge. There are a few questionable sources, no doubt, but still mostly circumstantial not knowing for sure if the forces and organizations were actually Russian.
If the corrupt, internationalist, bolshevik/banker media said so, then by one tactic or another, it is not the truth..
Donbas region was already liberated so there was no need to liberate the region, so liberating Donbas was not an objective. We already know,
As Putin stated, Russian troops entered Ukraine to secure two new states’ independence: Luhansk and Donetsk. By pushing beyond, they did that.
As I stated many times, the people of these two states are predominantly Russian. It is quite possible, I speculate, that the votes to stay in Ukraine or return to Russia, reported by the corrupt, bolshevik/banker media as dishonest and Russian-influenced, was a tue representation of the majority of people in that region, to return to Russian society.
You must understand the perspective of people in the Ukraine Russia region.
The people are basically one. They originate from the Kievan-Russ empire.
Ukrainian language is slightly different because at one time in recent history (I forget and cannot be bothered to look) the Ukrainian language was slightly changed to accommodate a differentiation.
Ok, so I am not versed in this aspect, but it does not matter.
I speak some of both languages. Counting to 10 in both languages is understood by the other.
In one case the number one is “one”. In the other it is “first”, 9 and 10 are dievet and diecet or deviet and deciet. Like four and five, fuor and fiev.
So, regarding “Ukrainians” living in corrupt Ukraine, many would prefer to be slightly Ukrainian and mostly Russian, and be in better, more representative Russia, than corrupt exploitive and in trouble Ukraine.
What the western media is not revealing is that since the obama/biden bolshevik take-over of Ukraine the Ukraine economy, life expectancy and standard of living has dropped drastically. Russians and Ukrainians alike in Ukraine long for better days and lives as part of the Russian Federation.
Do you realize that in the term Russian Federation, just the word, “Federation” is a part of a greater representative awakening on the pat of the Russian population as a whole?
What is Federation? Too much to cover, Look it up and study Federal/Federation in the book, “The Federalist Papers.
There is so much, I cannot cover everything but you need to know, if only lightly, principles that have made America, and Americans, as a result, great. This is not boasting. Another topic, another day. Laugh out loud.
I picture a newly emerging Russian nation, a nation that restores representation to a degree, and rooting out corruption in Russian government across the nation, would be appealing to Ukrainians as much as it would be to Russians.
So, back to this “war”. The border has been moved and it is quite possible the Russian military will fall back to the border delineations originally desired, but, of course, not reported.
In any fight, you fight harder than you think you need to. This applies in a street fight or a major military offensive. It is easier to let up as circumstances may dictate, but you certainly would be foolish to not expect a better fight and/or more from your enemy. Of course the corrupt demented bolshevik/banker media will not mention anything real or logical so there will never be a presumed truth or reality expressed for Russia.
So Russia can push far into Ukraine, to the very capital itself, relent, accept “loss” and retreat to borders easier to defend.
Hit hard and back off. Let the initial shock be part of the following campaign that works in the minds of the enemy. Sun Tzu’s principles.
The Ukrainians and world can heave a sigh of relief that Ukraine is still somewhat intact, and also accept an armistice or peace agreement of some sort while it appears Russia must also compromise, accept loss, and retreat: all part of the predetermined plan and objective.
Some call it haggling. Negotiating from a position of power is always the goal.
Stockpiles and chemical weapons labs in operation cannot be allowed to survive, but if they do, the hit, the attack must be enough to make the enemy think twice about further lab and chemical weapons enterprises. This could have, and should have, been one of Russia’s objectives.
Is Ukraine deterred? Did Zelensky, worried about alliance with internationalist bolshevik/banker tyranny and sk for negotiations with Russia, two weeks ago?
Do not be surprised if Zelensky is “taken out”. He was, is a puppet dictator hangin’ out with giant black widow spiders. See my articles….
It would be understandable that the Russian military did more, accomplished more, was far more successful and less injured than the corrupt media reports.
Real Russian success must be overshadowed by the corrupt media to give Russian military a failure and reason to execute war crimes against Ukrainians, for an emotionally charged, irrational response form…dummies.
It is all fabrication, executions by fifth columns of CIA creation.
Did you catch that? I did not mention it loosely.
One of the objectives of the Russian incursion was to eliminate fascist forces in Ukraine: forces preparing to invade Russia, more.
Is this not reported by mainstream, bolshevik/banker media?
No (sarcasm), that kind of deception is just not right and international bolshevik/banker media would never stoop so low.
Of course most fascist ideologues of the Azov brigade are ignorant, but manipulated to believe they have a worthy cause. These forces, that do exist, communist or fascist, all have commonalities: ruthless, lawless, impositions of rule with no representation granted for subjects. It can be explained in other terms as pure, ruthless, self-serving, majority rule democracy.
I imagine a panel of seven people who rule about your guilt or innocence, and then dictate law without your involvement. They rule and you live or die. See the Russian made movie, “The checkist”, 1992, to see just how evil democracy is.
Communism, Maoism, stalinism, democracy, all are evil incarnations of fake representation, majority of a small party or committee, or panel rule on those denied access. Do you see the evil yet?
Now imagine a governing democracy of 435 members….