10,883 out of 10,885 is not 97 percent.

Written by scientists or dem/libs?

So there are two scientists of dissenting opinions?

Only two? What are their names?

That is so funny. These morons expect people to believe there are two that don’t believe global warming is a hoax?

I thought the number was 97 percent.

If these buffoons are going to lie, at least get the lies close to accurate.

Out of 10,885 “scientists” (laugh), 97 percent would be 10,558.45m, leaving 27 dissenters. Where did the other 25 go? Did they vanish, with the 10,883, or did they not exist to begin with, like the 10,883 global hoaxers, I mean warmers?

Do I seem afraid to look at this objectively, honestly, rationally?

Really, tell us which lie it is, 97 percent of all democrat party-paid scientists agree, or is it that only two don’t agree?

Ask your doctor if paying him or her for services not rendered is right for you. Ask your doctor if paying for services not rendered is right for him or her. Ask your global hoaxer, I mean warmer if your sacrifice but not his/her/its, is right for the planet.

That’s too funny. Such a boring moronic conflict of interest this site has never seen, and it can only come from a lunatic liberal from la-la-land.

10,883 scientists?

What are their names?

That is funny. Really, who are they? Are they nameless fabrications from the lunatic leaps of the lost in la-la-land liberal mind?

Which mind? Who collected the names?

Who did the survey?

Where is the survey information?

Anyone that sponsors a survey wants the information published. Where is the survey?

Where is the publication?

Where is the list of names?


Tell us. Is there a list in Scientific American?

Is there a list of names in Popular Science?

Is there a list of names in who’s making money from the dem/lib trillion dollar stimulus?

Anybody that expends that much effort, to survey that many people, certainly knows their reputation and credibility are questionable until the burden of proving their hypothesis is correct.

At the worst they want their information published or it is nothing.

Where is the raw data?

Who are these “scientists”?

Ok, maybe a different approach would work.

Who are the two that do not agree?

Where can we find them?

You see, dear reader, the liberal rats will not even mention their names because we would see a whole community of consistency, opposing global hoaxing, I mean warming.

You can go to petitionproject.org and see the names of the 31,487 scientists who agree, global hoaxing, I mean warming, is a hoax.

Oh, but wait. If we give the loser-libbies, the math retards, another chance maybe we can find the 10,883 lost global hoaxing, I mean warming, scientists that agree.

Petition project.org lists 31,487 scientists. The total is 31,487.

If we add the 10,883 to that number we have 42,372 scientists who believe global warming/climate change is a hoax. Please, serve yourself with rfact, truth, and reality. Go to the site and pick a nam. You will find a real person, while the 10,883 cannot be found, except for a handful I mention in a different commentary.

Of these 10,883 who “believe” in peter pan….I mean never-never land, I mean global hoaxing, I mean, math, a little over 200 of them, actually exist and can be found on the list of the la-la-land liberal 10,883 consensus of science. How solid, is that consensus if 200 of 10,883 exist? Hmmm, let’s do the math, real science:  about 2%.

The consensus is worth about 2% of reality, truth and integrity. That barely meets the requirements for margin of error, much less margin of correct hypothesis or theory, or science.

Boy, this new math by these liberal super intellects, is tough.

In fact, the percentage is not even close. In fact the percentage that believe is less than 50 percent, making the loser libbies, AGAIN, the VAAAAAAAAST minority.

Woo hoo, that’s close to 97 percent, if we take a 300 percent margin of error.

Margin of error: a little tough for poopy pantser utardidiot to figure out. A normal scientific margin of error is about 2 to 4 percent: unless you are a dem/lib peter pan.

Really, he could fly, if he existed. Hmm, existence, kind of a big, important factor.

The loser libbies, taking a mid range margin of error of 3%, are off by more than 33 times a normal margin of error, 33 times as much as their own margin of actuality.

WOW! That is some kind of nightmarish math.

But, tell us why the global hoaxers, I mean warmers, want our compliance.

Tell us why the global hoaxers, I mean warmers, want We, the People to surrender OUR rights and freedoms, OUR hard earned cash, cars and heated homes?

And to whom do they want these things surrendered, to those who have not given up these monstrous planet-killing toxins?

This dem/lib, progressive/bolshevik hypocrisy is deadly when we consider that 300 million Americans could be out of heat for the winters ahead, while the global hoaxing, I mean warming, pigs live lives of luxury and warmth.

It is potential genocide, by a bunch of math-retarded psychos.

And if their math is so bad in plain sight, how bad is all their math?

Maybe the reality is that we have global cooling. Trends, 30,000 scientists, common sense and reality indicate cooling.

Cartoons, fabrications with cool lines and colors, and lies do not make truth.

Fabricating numbers that do not match does not make truth or fact.

Again, who are these 10,883 scientists? What are their names? I crack me up.

Show us the list. How about utardia just show us a reference to the survey or company that collected the “data”?

Who did the survey, NOAA that cannot get the terminology correct? Morons!


If I could draw a cartoon I would draw two white, old, men Hillary and moochelle oafama, riding a donkey backwards, claiming they are the 97 percent that “believe” global hoaxing, I mean warming, is an accurate science. The caption would be, spoken by hillary, of course, “we knowed it is currect, because we knowed it.”

Too funny, and of course, being consistent with dem/lib theology, a cartoon that insults democrats, liberals and global hoaxers, I mean warmers, makes the claim true.

Woo hoo. I win!


We can all go home now, and turn up the heat, fire up those muscle cars, and throw our dem/lib neighbors into the streets to freeze in the “warm” winters (but not the deep freeze every year in the north east- it never happens).

If we were to stop the political/global elite from heating their homes and driving cars, the carbon print would drop massively. The is a very big return on investment, and we would beat global hoaxing, I mean warming.

YAY. We all win, and the dem/libs get what they want for others, for themselves: that they try to force upon others, not themselves.

NOT on my watch, you filthy pigs!



How does one explain the extremely cold winter of 2020 and unusually cold month of March?

I call it Covid-19 distraction. Is anybody talking about oceans rising when the so-called extreme heat is gone and the cold makes the ocean level drop? It doesn’t actually do that, nobody has shown how silly climate-change hoaxing observations connect to unobserved causes.

How do dem/libs explain this unusually, very long cold spell? Covid-19, distraction. Is anybody talking about record high temperatures when we have had years of declining average temperatures, and this spring is the coldest we have experienced in decades? The average daily highs for every day in March were 10 to 20 degrees below average. Nobody has shown how silly climate change observations connect to never shown claims of effects.

How do some people explain the quiet, almost non-existent claims that we, the human race and the world have only 7 years to reverse this “heat” and climate change? Covid-19, distraction from reality.

To most people politics is not involved in everything. Most people cannot accept that there are people who will kill, slaughter, lie cheat and steal for gain. Politicians, the democrats in Congress, exploited a politically-fabricated situation and added a fat juicy raise for themselves and their minions, the unelected, non-governmental agencies and democrat/liberal/progressive institutions the democrats need to feed to stay in power.

Politicians connect all these issues and fools refuse to see how one seemingly unrelated distraction is actually the effect of a different cause from the same source.

Again, it is all politics.

Covid-19 does not exist except where it has been reported and effects of different causes have been used.

Governor Cuomo and “fredo”, his mentally deranged, goofy brother reporter suddenly started telling the truth?

Liars lie, they always lie.

There are numerous links in reporting cause of death.

When a person goes into an emergency waiting room and fills out forms there is a lull, a wait. S person in very difficult situations would be seen as in dire need and rushed to care. A person with a gunshot wound, for example, bleeding, potentially close to passing, is observed and rushed. Covid-19 “sufferers” are not seen in emergency rooms as dire need cases. The “victim” fills out forms and waits, unless of course breathing is difficult, dire need potential of dying.

A wait ensues if there are cases ahead. Eventually a doctor sees the patient but if not in emergency surgery the doctor follows protocol. Asks questions, checks lymph nodes, looks in eyes, ears, throat, checks temperature (usually nurse does that) and prescribes a “cold” remedy. The case is then reviewed and assumed Covid because the doctors are instructed, in many states and regions, to “play it safe”. Play iy safe presumptions are lazy ways of claiming overload and a political agenda. To politicians all things, all issues and calamities are connected. They are connected by politicians’ lies. But, not all politicians lie and see connections. We call these few politicians, representatives.

The third link is follow up. So many have died of covid-19, the claims report, but again, there is never a link shown and the fact is usually just a claim. Have the 8,000 or so deaths, due to covid-19, been proven as a result of covid-19, by autopsy?

The fourth link, hospitalization just in case, just to observe, and assume it is covid-19. LIES presented as physical reality, therefore presented as truth of another infection. LIES, tricks by liars.

All death is by cardiac arrest. Pneumonia causes constricted oxygen flow, and the brain and heart die. The brain can die and the body survive, if the heart keeps pumping. Covid-19 does not cause anything that makes cardia arrest. Covid-19, a ghost virus, is said to cause flu-like symptoms, which means it is a flu. A person who shows signs of carina arrest, and then has a heart stoppage, is actually in cardiac arrest. It is not kidney failure.

How many people in New York city, for example, have not died of flu because it is presumed, by a dishonest politician and his corrupt brother reporter, at a fake news agency, both “working” together (Cuomo brothers) to create an effect they cannot show is actual and cannot show is a result of the cause a handful claim exists?

The CDC can throw a picture of a “virus” and claim it is anything. Who knows the difference? Are CDC scientists like global hoaxing scientists? Maybe they are the same people who present observations and show no connection to an effect they claim exists?

Are people actually dying of this ghost-virus covid-19? No.

Quo bono? Always look for crime where someone benefits. Politicians have America in lock-down, destroying our lives and pursuit of happiness, and they gain, by writing fat raises for themselves and their supporters: fake representative processes they feign.


Has anybody noticed the climate change people are silent? Were they told to stop writing their propaganda? We are in a terrible cold spell. This spells disaster for those who claim our world is heating up.

Are these dictators part of the cover-up of the incoming ice age?

Ok, so I embellished the incoming ice age part. Today, April 4th, 2020, we are heeding warnings across the United States for winter storms, in spring. Record cold periods do not make global warming.

I call it global warming because that is what the lying global writers and fabricators mean by climate change. I call it global warming, and not climate change, because that is what the global hoaxing goons claim is happening, without admitting it is not warming.

All conditions they claim as part of “climate change” are the same conditions they fabricated for global warming. Many years ago the global hoaxers had to disfigure the jargon, the rhetoric (lies) to suit a political agenda: control.

Today the hoaxers claim warming is the effect but do not want it identified as warming. They want you afraid of the planet heating up, but refuse to call it heating. They want the masses to believe there is something evil and sinister causing the climate to change and only the right party can fix it, with the demise and slaughter of the other party, more than half of America.

The scary, nebulous “climate change”, that nobody knows about except the mysterious writer/scientists, can only be controlled and restored with the right politics of burdensome taxation and totalitarian control, by the party of nebulous goals of everything, except politics in their favor.

None of the non-existent “climate change” community, that is actually a writers’ guild of fake science, refers to this nebulous change as “warming, even though it is warming they claim is causing the change. They prefer a more nebulous, generalization of nothing either way, warming or cooling, so they can lay claim to all information as they, themselves being the source, and thus the experts of irrefutable, unchallenged expertise, in nothing, except narcissism and control.

The writers and pretenders claim it is warming causing change but they want you to believe they are not saying it is warming, because the warming cycle cannot be shown to be true. They want the effects of their lies to manipulate the masses without being caught lying.

So the climate is changing, according to their newly found mysterious religion, but warming that produces the effects of warming, as they profess, is not warming, it is change. This is so absurd, and amazingly un-scientific, it is astounding how backward and sub-intelligent they are.

If I could describe it in terms of an ex-friend, who defriended me on farcebook because I disagreed with his regurgitations, I present an anecdote.

The dope, Adam Wills, posted a drawing of a giant wave crashing onto a coastal city, with a caption that “climate change” was going to cause massive destruction. It was a drawing. It was a cartoon showing a wave at least 200 feet high (doubling the height of a building of 10 stories). I asked Ade\am if there was any science to show an increase in wave size and volume, creating a trend that might show an increase in tidal wave sizes that could possibly create that scenario. D’uh?

It is science, math, cause and effect, but that never deterred moronic dem/libs from making silly, unscientific claims. If one observed an increase in wave height over, say, a period of 20 years, one could predict where that trend might carry tidal wave heights.

There is nothing, never has been a study showing tidal wave height change or anything related. The dem/libs have no idea how to design and execute an experiment, or just a study of existing data so to think any dem/lib moron could figure out how to determine whether the 200 foot tidal wave is a cartoon or a real projection, is absolute foolishness.

I could easily design a study of existing data, if it existed.

I would look at tidal wave heights that can be isolated to certain time periods, seasons or reliable and predictable frames.

If data existed that showed a change in tidal wave, or any wave heights, the dem/libs and their moron ghostly writers of non-science, would be all over it, if they knew what to look for: so unlikely.

But, let us suppose data existed for a monthly average wave height in the spring of a northern city that had regular freezes and thaws.

What if that wave height was 22 feet? That would be rare because even the highest waves, that do not destroy towns or cities, or ant farms, anywhere in the world, rarely reach heights over 20 feet. The biggest surfing waves in the world eclipse waves everywhere. Those big waves reach 60 feet, and that is all.

If we notice over 20 years that our 22 foot waves actually increased in height to 25 feet, that would be an increase of 7.33 percent. If that actually happened, or if only a tenth of that happened, .733 percent increase, the global hoaxing community would have a bird, but, what does it mean? Let us take an unheard and impossible amount of increase, at 7.33 parent, over 20 years and extrapolate it until we get 200 foot waves from 22 foot waves. That, this could be considered a scientific prediction: the reason for science.

The next 20 years would produce a 26.85 feet. The following 20 years would give us a wave height of 28, and after 300 years, a foolish projection, based on no real data in existence, would produce a wave of only 60.8 feet. It would take another 600 years to attain a 200 foot wave, if data were correct, or in existence.

Remember, this is a fabricated scenario based on non-existent data and political motivations to control, YOU.

The fabricated conditions are: rising water levels due to melting ice due to increased heat. Reality: it is getting.colder.

Increased drought due to heat. Reality, it is obviously getting colder.

How can we have increased moisture and drought at the same time? Is there another variable, movement, the dimwit dem/lib global hoaxing morons cannot imagine or consider? Unbelievable how sub-intelligent climate hoaxing is. It is astounding how sub-intelligent dem/libs are.

The never shown cause of “climate change” is increased greenhouse gases. Reality: more water in oceans, increased heat, more water for plant life across the world, increased plant growth, increased oxygen output.

All these fabrications unconnected to poorly presented effects are the same whether global “warming” or climate change. So call it what it is, warming, because cooling reverses everything and they want everything tied to heat.

Are the so-called “viral scientists the same “scientists”; the same un-scientific writers and modelers moved from global hoaxing?


RE: “publius piglius” A response to a Stephen Hawking “Report” on Craigslist, Salt Lake City, November 6, 2016

What a mess of a being, utardia. What a lying piece of dog crap.

Nothing that moron writes is true.

Hawking said nothing about Trump. Hawking is a scientist, actually not a scientist, a theorist. He is not a political commentator. His “intelligence” does not spill over into other areas because he does not exert any effort in anything else except imagination and science fiction.

Utardia/whatever’s first line, first lie.

No, not a lot of people consider hawking to be the smartest… some do, maybe. How many think what bolshevik-dick claims, is a lot, 70 trillion, 70, 3? Is it a matter of percentage? Is 3.3 million a “lot of people”? 3.3 million represents one percent. Can dick not think in terms of context?

Hawking’s theories are theories. There is no science to theory until there is experiment.

Which Tuesday did Hawking, allegedly say these things? This moron, utardia, cannot even get logistical facts right. Utardia/whatever writes that, ”So it’s understandable why, on Tuesday, people sort of freaked out when….”

This comment by urardia has been posted and reposted and reposted and reposted, over and over and over for months.

There is no date, not even the month or year. If you google this it does not exist.

No date, just a fabrication with an intentional evasion of a date, to hide the fraud, and thus the second sub-sentence, the conditional, that people sort of freaked out, is a lie as well.

That’s great. Moronicus/maximus, utardia/whatever, got two lies in one sentence. He/she/it is getting worse. Pardon me, he/she/it has been worse for a long time.

One would think this moron would eventually learn. Dangling and misplaced modifiers makes his/her/its sentences whacky and contradictory.

Is Trump’s rise due to his non-existent interview with British News Station ITV NEWS? According to moron utardia/whatever, it is the connection. Does this moron try to connect these “things” purposely?

Everything is a fabrication.

Here we go again, ”Human caused climate change”, allegedly spoken by non-scientist, non-political commentator, on a non-day, non-month, non-year in a non publication. Wow, do you, dear fellow American actually believe anything dick writes?

One might be able to ascribe some sense to a statement Hawking did not make if it wasn’t so uproariously whacky. 250 degrees? The temperature of the planet is going to increase 250 degrees because of CO2 breaking free of another nothing at the bottom of the oceans? That is just stupid. I mean, laughable stupid stooooooooooooooopid. Is that utardia/whatever actually this stupid? Even Hawking’s goofy theories are not as stupid.

If Hawking is so smart maybe he can explain what is holding, binding large amounts of CO2 on the ocean’s floor? Is it mud, because we have mud everywhere? Is it silt, because we have silt everywhere? Is it sand, rocks, whale poo, because we have all that everywhere?

Mr. “scientist” needs to explain such a crazy theory. Oops, did I mention theory? Did I actually use that word “theory”? Did Hawking do an experiment or theorize? Did Hawking, or whale-poop brain utardia/whatever go to the bottom of the oceans, EVERYWHERE and find trapped, bound, CO2 in massive amounts, and measure it, or is that theory too?

But wait, the interview did not happen, on a television station that does not exist for a pseudo-theorist to comment on something for which he is not an expert, in a world where Hawking does not venture.

So the theory must be looney toony utardia/whatever’s imagination: utardia/whatever’s sci-fi fantasy, another hate-motivated fraud.

So Hawking made no such statements or theories. Hawking has not been to the bottom of the oceans; in fact nobody has.

Hawking, Trump, the British Prime minister, Utardia/moronicus/whatever has not been to the ocean floor, and nobody, ABSOLUTELY NOBODY HAS BEEN TO THE OCEAN FLOOR.



The greatest danger to mankind is liberalism. Liberalism (democrat party eugenicists and maniacs) is the biggest promoter of big, centralized government.

The world is a history of big, centralized government, and big, centralized government causing wars, murdering people, and being the sole cause of genocide.

Hang that filthy slob utardia/whatever, for treason.

This dem/lib/progressive propaganda is murder and genocide-in-the-making.


Inconsistencies in dem/lib/progressive/eugenicist propaganda regarding global warming.

I do not use that word, propaganda, lightly.

To propagate something is is to create propaganda, but specifically, the unspoken meaning of words, particularly, the word “propaganda” is that propaganda includes an element of deception.

The panacea of global warming is a massive fraud.

To apply “global warming”, or the new co-option, “climate change”,  as the cause for almost everything that the propaganda agents fabricate, is to defer the scientific method, finding cause of effect, and making change. It is tantamount to using a nuclear weapon for a mosquito problem.

First of all, global warming is undefined. It is indefinable, by design. It is an over-generalization meant to cover everything the dem/lib/progressives decide to control.

No matter where we go; no matter what we read or hear, global warming “specialists” pop up with indictments for nothing but fabricated causes, unrelated results and completely disconnected solutions.

On craigslist rantsandraves, in Salt Lake City, one liberal “writer” continues to accuse every incident of weather and democrat party distrust and rejection, on the big bad wolf of global warming.

The big bad wolf, of lore, was never a wolf. What was the wolf? What is the wolf?

The vampire, the killer in the myths does not exist. There never was a vampire. There is no such thing as a vampire (well, except democrat politicos sucking the life and blood out of America). Democrat politicos and liberals is the closest thing to a real vampire in existence. I am tempted to state boldly that even democrats are NOT vampires per se, but who knows for sure how many lives the clintons have personally taken. Maybe they have even drunk the blood of their victims. The big bad wolf is a metaphor but vampirism and satan worship are not myths.  Even though satan the being may not exist as myth claims, Satan worship is not a myth. Vampirism is not a myth either. Histories of 

I remember a picture of butcher-billy-bob clinton hugging a woman in Kosovo. The story is that she was part of a blood sacrifice the following evening and clinton, master mahan clinton, did the sacrifice.

Our local utardia, moron blames everything on global warming, but that does not solve the problem.

It is not intended to solve fabricated problems, proven simply by the fact that the dem/libs offer only political solutions to problems that do not exist. The big bad wolf is a fabrication placed in the minds of unsuspecting victims by others, those who want control of the victims. How are the victims identified? The solutions are never problem related, indicating an agenda supra to the fabricated problems of global hoaxing.

I could refer to an innumerable examples dem/libs present for which the causes are amazingly disconnected.

Our local moron, not so local, an agent working Utah and other locales, admittedly, living over 2,000 miles away, posted an article on Stephen Hawking stated, to paraphrase, ‘the release of CO2 from the ocean floor would elevate temperatures to about 250 degree’.

Who is responsible for that CO2 release? How is that CO2 release my problem or a result of my actions, in any way? Yet, the monster fabricator claims I need to submit to democrat party rule with no cause-and-effect connection: no reason why. How are these two entities related? Obviously, and logically, they are not, but in the minds and fabrications of dem/libs they are related.

They are related by effect but not cause. They are related by the effect of extracting my compliance using a tool of rhetoric, deception, or outright fraud, whichever you want to call it.

it does not matter what cause the dem/lib frauds use, the effect is always submission to democrat party/liberal rule. I am not talking about submission to democracy, or rule of law. I am not making a reference in the least to submission to or participation in Constitutional Republic, self-governance.

When I use the word rule, it is more closely associated with tyranny, despotism, dictatorship, and murderous oppression. This is what the dem/libs offer. If it is not obvious by their use of words, it must obvious in their avoidance of words such as Constitution and representation, and terms such as rule of law, self-governance, and Bill of Rights.

The effect is always centralized rule, taking away our rights to individual decision making and individual opportunity.

The big general “global warming” hoax is designed specifically to give tyranny an excuse to oppress and rule. This is slavery.

But where are the connections to the problems? There are none. Returning to the example of the Hawking claim that the earth will experience 250 degree heat, and doing some research, we discover Hawking never made that statement. In my search for that claim I found no reference by Hawking, at all, to global warming. Hawking, being a scientist, or at least a mathematician, could not, in a scientific vein of integrity, make such a claim.

Surely Hawking understands scientific methodology of proving or disproving a theory or hypothesis.

Surely Hawking would know that an immeasurable CO2 quantity at the bottom of the ocean could NEBVER be traced to the effect dem/libs continually propagate: democrat party rule without opposition or dissent.

What is the actual cause of this fabricated CO2 release?

Why does the dem/lib effect only include a deflection from the undefined problem, the cause of CO2 release? Why does the dem/lib effect avoid the cause of this mysterious CO2 build-up, and the necessity of compliance to democrat party compliance? Is there a real cause or is it a causal claim only?

Should we define the problem of global warming we might be able to attack the causes.

Sticking to the posted, fabricated claim, what is the cause of CO2 release?

If it were dry ice sinking to the bottom of the oceans, releasing CO2 that binds to sediment or rocks down there, then how could we stop dry ice from sinking to the bottom of the ocean, and where and how is this dry-ice created and transported to the ocean? If dry ice were transported to the oceans, would it not dissolve on the way? Why an how does CO2 get to the bottom of the oceans and from where did it spring into existence. The idea that CO2 can be released from the bottom of the ocean is not as far-fetched and ludicrous, lunatic in fact, as to how the CO2 got to the bottom of the ocean? Is CO2 a gas? Does a compound in a gaseous state not rise in water?

Do not expect logic in anything the global warming/climate change writers fabricate. Yes, I used the word writers. I have not found a scientist doing an experiment or measuring a thing related to climate or weather in any of the articles I have dissected from IPCC, NASA, NOAA, AAAS, WMO, or other related pretenses.

What has caused, if we assume even the most insane fabrication to be exemplified, the “gathering” or build-up of CO2 on the bottom of the ocean? Can the pretentious, deleterious effect be reversed? That would be a start to cause-and-effect science and problem solving. But the dem/libs do not want their fabricated problems solved. If they did their claims would include measurements, data and and presumptions, such as one would find prepared as a theory or hypothesis. Nothing is ever forthcoming, except attacks and emotional manipulation.

They do not even want their fabricated problems discussed, hence the deflective and childish ramblings from the discussions.

But let us take this pretense even further. Suppose there actually is a build up of CO2 on the bottom of the ocean: setting aside the deceptive and manipulative impossibility spontaneously springing to threatening proportions,  by this utardia traitor. Suppose we set aside the insanity of claiming something for which there is no data and something for which data cannot even be acquired; what is the cause and how can it be reversed, if that is the goal? 

When global warming is broken down it is obviously not about reparations to the planet.

CO2 emissions from the ocean floor are going to cause 250 degree temperatures, according to global hoaxers pretending to quote Stephen Hawking. HOW?

According to scientists pretending to listen to a fellow “peer-reviewed” guy, pretending, the ocean floor will release CO2 and will cause major catastrophes, 250 degree temperatures are not life threatening, rather life terminating, immediately. Who went to the ocean floor and ensured CO2? Who discovered a change in CO2 levels on the ocean flor? Who measured change, and developed a pattern showing an increase oi CO2 levels of ocean floor pretense? Who did anything, except manipulate fear to force compliance to a ghost on the bottom of the oceans?

The problem; the weird thing about this impending catastrophe, is that CO2 emitted is the earth’s problem, not mankind’s problem. I thought the whole global hoaxing challenge was to stop man’s destructive impact on the climate, but CO2 escaping from the ocean floor, as Hawking states (or is falsely accused) cannot be directly, oddly or even mysteriously connected to anything mankind or any person may have done, especially to such a degree as to affect the whole world.

If so destructive, so potentially devastating to end all life, why are scientists right now, not trying to stop the devastating effect? If 250 degrees is projected, as the dem/lib hoaxers claim, then that is the biggest problem in the world, not man. Will global hoaxer utardia rally mankind? What scientists are addressing this sacrosanct event and who is doing something about it, or is it silly? Maybe we should make a hundred billion tons of concrete and pour it in the oceans to seal the bottom of the ocean from releasing CO2?

The insanity is that the dem/libs are doing what tyranny always does, and they want the same results: total control of all people. There is nothing new to tyranny’s cries for unification to fight an unseen enemy, along with massive surrender of rights and wealth to the criers.

They, the global inciters, hope you, We, the People forget that we are being led to do the same things others in other civilizations have done in the slide to slavery.

We are given only drips of information so we can be convinced the science is there but invisible and/or difficult because of the slow acquisition of data and knowledge, that never materializes.



Regarding “consensus” of global warming / “climate change” fabricators.

I went to the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) website.

I have stated many times the dem/lib fabrications and pretentious “science” does not intimidate me. Spending my time fighting dummies and liars, sadly drains my time, but it must be done.

I always close with a bit of regret at being a bully to the child-ids that pretend to be scientists because all they can do is lie, and get caught.

If I could, I would kick the shit out of every single one of those lying, treasonous bastards. Oh, I do it here, every time I refute their lies, and rebuke their fraud and stupidity.

So, I looked at the one that looked the most intimidating. It claimed, Thirty-One Top Scientific Societies Speak with One Voice on Global Climate Change”.

The article starts with, <i><b>“In a consensus letter to U.S. policy-makers, a partnership of 31 leading non-partisan scientific societies…”</i></b>

A consensus letter? This is double talk. A consensus letter that describes a consensus taken from a letter of a consensus…. with no data.

There is nothing except a group of partisan frauds (always the big lie- paid for by democrat party/liberal goons that steal money from Americans and then write letters).

Without a reason or foundation for a claim, the consensus writers stated something had to be done about a something that has no reality. But did the consensus writers write the letter? Do the consensus writers exist?

The article continues with the same dodging and weaving, and avoidance of real material and data. There is no evidence if there is no data. There is no evidence if there is no measurement. There is no evidence if there is no study, or reference to a study, or a thought of a study. This whole fraudulent business of global hoaxing is a dem/lib denial of work. These buffoons, no names, simply sit around and write consensus letters based on nothing. But did they write the letter? Where are the names and references?

I read the whole article. There is not a single reference to a study or a shred, or a tittle; not even a line of notes from a study.

There is a reference to, <i><b>“…independent lines of evidence…”.</i></b>

The second paragraph is unbelievably un-scientific. What moronic scientist would spout about recommendations without a reason?

The second paragraph begins, <i><b>““Observations throughout the world make it clear that climate change is occurring, and rigorous scientific research concludes that the greenhouse gases emitted by human activities are the primary driver,” the collaborative said in its 28 June letter to Members of Congress.”</i></b>

There was no such letter sent to congress.

How about this overgeneralized pretense at research? Try this for clarity of how un-scientific that sentence reveals these morons truly are.

Observations throughout the world make it clear that men over 10 feet tall, are clearly on the rise. Or, Observations throughout the world make it clear that global cooling is occurring. Without a shred of evidence, or a reference to a recorded “observation”, my silly statement is as powerful and credible as the buffoons collectively pretending science. But, again, who are these societies? Did “they” actually write the letter, or the consensus?

Rigorous scientific research concludes that the greenhouse gases emitted by humans… is a lie.

What greenhouse gases do humans emit, oxygen? That is a gas emitted by a greenhouse full of plans that convert carbon dioxide to oxygen.

Humans do not emit greenhouse gases. Greenhouses do not emit greenhouse gases.

There is no such thing as a greenhouse gas. It is not even a rational fabrication that dem/libs have fashioned that proves there is such a thing. It is all speculation, not even a theory yet because it has not been written in a hypothesis or theory: never studied. It has been modeled by politically biased (paid) and partisan frauds (paid democrat party left-wing extremists).

Then the sentence ends with, <i><b>“…the collaborative said…”.</i></b>

A consensus letter with nothing, says nothing, Scientists can say something, but there is not a single name attached. So who is saying?

Go, my fellow Americans and readers; go to a scientific journal or magazine, or site, and look at any article. Look at the references. All have references. A scientist worth anything builds as big a foundation as possible of stable, referenced, factors and variables by referencing studies and conclusions of other scientists. Some real studies have longer lists of references than the article itself. A real scientist revels in his or her connections to references and data and hence, reality. There is not even one single reference in all these bogus sites to study, science, a scientist, a scientific research or variable. There is absolutely nothing to the bogus fabrications found at AAAS, NASA, NOAA, WMO, and TCCS (The Center for Climate and Security). In all those sites I found not one single reference to a study, a scientific variable or even anomaly. The “science” is so bad, these buffoons do not even reference margin of error.

I found nothing on any of the aforementioned, bogus sites, from which a real scientist could establish a foundation for a solid control group or solid control data. Please, my fellow Americans and truth-seekers, go to these sites and find data. Without data there is no conclusions for anything. How can science promote a change when the change requires prior knowledge and desired position? There is nothing to base these bogus claims upon, except political solutions. The political solutions benefit only one class, not We, the People.

Any scientist worth an ounce of credibility surely wants his or her name attached to profound claims of science. Why is there not a single name attached? These scientists do NOT exist. They are names of weather reporters, experts in other fields that have no knowledge their names are being used to promote the words of a few lying liberal writers and fabricators.

We are talking about 5 organizations with multiples of people involved, one would think, but of 5 organizations, all we have is a report by a biased “reporter” claiming 31 organizations collaborated to produce a consensus, based on nothing. That is the REALITY of this whole global hoaxing situation.

What are all these political solutions based on? Are they observations but no measurements; observations but no pretest and post test? All this is based on observations made by nobody. There is nobody in the global hoaxing community that can be called a scientist when there is nobody in the global hoaxing community that can show a scientific reference.

Of all the consensuses, “studies”, “papers”, reports”, “collaborations”, “letters”, there is not one reference to a single measurement. There are conclusions based on absolutely nothing observable because there is nothing to be observed: nothing the dem/lib global hoaxers want made public. In all these papers, consensuses, etc., what was observed? i ask. Show us.

The paragraph ends with, “This conclusion is based on multiple independent lines of evidence and the vast body of peer-reviewed science.” What real scientist reviews a “scientific paper” by a non scientist? A fool or paid interloper, fraud. What true scientist reviews a consensus letter with no scientists attached, no references attached or included, and no data? What scientist would put his or her name to a bogus paper? A real scientist would lose credibility. It is no different than Michael Jordan being asked to review basket ball skills of local soccer sideliner, Pete Bromley, who has never played soccer or basketball in his life. Jordan would laugh. Real scientists, when asked to “review” the bogus, goofy, silly, fabricated nonsense  of statements, claims and pretentious science of NOAA, WMO, AAAS, NASA, TCCS, and other political deflections, do not even bother laughing. 

If Jordan were to critique Pete, Jordan would be a laughing stock, and so it is in the “global hoaxing community” where non-scientists, that do not exist, are written into existence by poor writers of global hoaxing fiction, and real scientists recognize absolutely nothing scientific and worthy of comment.

We must ask, to what does our silly “writer” of this “consensus letter” refer when he/she/it/“they” write, “Independent lines of evidence”? The circular argument itself is poorly constructed.

Let us start with Peer-reviewed science.

What science is peer-reviewed? The term “peer reviewed” is a dem/lib fabrication, to begin with: an attempt to garner credibility where none can possibly exist. It is two devils taping wings to each others’ backs, and both claiming the other is an angel. “Peer reviewed” is a way for bogus scientists, realistically nothing more than political agents of propaganda, to deflect from real science that dem/lib political activists are afraid will easily be refuted or proven false. “Don’t waste your time”, the dem/libs say, “looking at the water levels of the past one hundred years. We have already done that and you can trust us because we have great political (did I say that?) solutions for you to live by”. ‘Don’t look in that room, its a mess. Trust me, there is nothing to see, especially your stolen trillion dollar stimulus money, or the gold we bought with it.’ Don’t look here or there for the “lost” emails. We have already taken care of the problems, and it won’t happen again. Trust me, hillary the vampire claims.

If one were to write about results of a study, there is no credibility in the results of the study being reviewed by another of the same study. A real scientist publishes results in many sources and exposes it to review by any and all. A real scientist welcomes criticism, but not these devils of the global hoaxing “community”. They want real scientists, and exposers of dem/lib fraud, self included, silenced by political solutions.

This claim that “peer-reviewed” is some superior form of scrutiny is a fraud. It is another liberal stupidism to give themselves credibility where none is due.

Which peer reviewed Einstein’s work?

Peers don’t review others’ work.

Did Nicola Tesla review Einstein? Did Einstein review Tesla?



Rand Paul Believes that climate change is real.

So what?

I believe that climate change is real too. I woke up this morning and noticed it was not 10 degrees, like it was January 10th, 2015. Do dem/libs also believe in time change? I woke up this morning and the time was different from when I went to bed. Observation makes science, to dem/lib  simple minds

I wonder, Do libbies weigh themselves before taking a crap and after, compare numbers, and call it weight loss?

Change is inevitable. But what is NOT inevitable is that mankind adjusts. On the history channel it was stated that the earth has been in a warming trend since the last ice age. Is that because neanderthal and homo habilus automobile emissions started warming the earth?

My gawd, how irresponsible and childish is it for “writer” to make such a stupid claim that Rand Paul “believes in climate change”. Did “writer” clarify? No, “writer” made a statement, a portion of another’s words, totally out of context, and then added his/her/its fabrications based on presumed credibility.

Maybe “writer” could tell us how Rand Paul, or anyone could NOT believe in climate change when he sees the seasons change.

I too believe in weight loss, after a crap. I even submit an environmental impact report after every crap. The trend is that after every crap I lose weight. This must mean I am in a weight loss trend. Funny how weight loss translates to an extra ten pounds every year. But, it is weight loss because I only look at observations I want to see, excluding all other variables and data I consider useless because the trend is that I WANT to tell people I have been losing weight. Are libbies that dishonest, or that stupid?

Take a 10,000 year warming trend and identify data that would isolate the cause of the effect. That would be the scientific method of proving or disproving an hypothesis. What variables have the liberals isolated with a logical explanation? NONE? The “scientists” have not even identified the variables they wish to observe, study and measure. The fundamental beginning of a scientific study or experiment is not known, much less understood, in dem/lib global hoaxers’ minds. What data, from 10,000 years ago, was collected and observed?

Ask that one scientist, Joe, the guy that was in a picture with another guy, John, at the IPCC convention (where they are told what to think, and are given absolutely no data. John was the janitor and Joe the principal of the school where they covered the school sign with IPCC.

The dem/libs provide no deep explanation, only fear mongering and unified lies. But wait, we have been in a cooling trend for 20 years. That is a fact. Did we not just have 15 states in the northeast and midwest report unusual cold and snow in April?

15 states report record cold, longer and later winters, more snow, and that is, magically,  global warming. Isolated variables? Not even identified much less observed and measured. Colder than average for a longer than average winter adds immensely to the dropping average temperatures locally, regionally and across the country. Did dem/libs “forget” to be scientific or did they refuse? Either way, it reveals their agenda is NOT, absolutely not, science.

So what if Rand Paul believes in climate change? What change does he “believe in”? Does he believe in climate changing from morning to evening? Does he believe in pollution causing polar bears to swim far distances? Oh, they already do that.

I doubt that “writer” presented the truth anyway. He/she/it, altus/bolshevik-dick/utardia, whatever and whomever, never presents all the facts; never presents the truth of who said what; never presents all the variables; never gives a correct representation of what he/she/it refers to, and certainly never isolates cause and effect; and cannot present any data because there is none.

There is no evidence for anything except computer generated estimates, that haters of mankind and science fabricate.

So, without even looking, I can tell that dimwit libby “writer” is lying.

You, my fellow Americans, can look for yourselves. You, my dear fellow citizens can look at any claim any liberal ever makes, that favors government intervention, regulation, registration and control. You can determine for yourselves if all the variables are included. If not, it is a test with a higher margin of error than margin of credibility. Without data the margin of error is infinity while the margin of reality is non-existent. Welcome to dem/lib la-la-land.

Why do these frauds lie to YOU, me? What line, factor or qualifier did lying liberal misfit “forget” to include? What variable or factor, or end of sentence did libby lout conveniently dismiss because it did not fit his/her/its agenda?

What is the liberal agenda, anyway?

The minority, liberals and democrat political elitists, want more than their share. How do we know this? They want their minority voice to rule above the voices of the majority. History refers to this as tyranny, monarchy, communism, fascism and other forms of elitist rule. It is no small matter that small groups reign over the masses. It is extremely significant, as the history of every country, nation, and community reveals that most humans will live off the labor of others (see Frederick Bastiat, The Law). America is no different. In every community, state or nation there are always those that will exploit others.

It is one thing to forcibly enslave others, quite another thing to lie and mislead others to a docile acceptance of a comfortable yolk.

This comfortable yolk, as history always proves, never stays comfortable. Proof is right before us, irrefutably part of the fabric and history of the struggle for freedom of the great American Constitutional Republic.

The democrat party is this machine of fraud and deception, to lead Americans, the vast majority, to a comfortable slavery. We are already in a form of comfortable slavery but those with no qualifications (democrats and liberals) “believe” they should have the reins of reign. Liberal lies start right at home. Liberals tell themselves they deserve more because they have something better in their characters. Usually it is the inane idea that because they do not “need” a god, they are inherently better, and “nicer”. The irony, incidentally, is that they work very hard to destroy god for others, in their own minds, and think the reality is proven by their imaginations. By this consideration they are less than human.

I, myself am atheist, but do not belittle other’s beliefs, unless the beliefs are fraudulent and exploitive, such as liberal, democrat party religion.

The core, the foundation of the democrat party is fraud and exploitation. The democrat party intends to rule the majority, as an elite group of smarter, evolved beings, that are actually dumb and de-evolved to instinctual, animalistic behavior. Witness for yourselves, my dear fellow citizens, quick tempers of liberals to attack conservatives and republic minded citizens with cruelty and open hatred because their fake superiority; their lacking superiority does not magically, unquestionably win discussion or arguments. They lose because they are inferior.

The reason for the hatred is not apparent. Every day on Craigslist some fraud, an agent of tyranny, or mutt-mind attacks me with no reference to a crime, offense or lie I have committed. I simply refute the lies of others, and refer to history and fact. Someone does not want history and fact known. Why?

So, this attack on myself, personally, is executed for no reason except that I express the will of We, the People (in the majority), and voice my opinion freely. Freedom of others without imposition by rulers, angers the liberals so much they want to shut me up. They always resort to cruel verbal assault, never a point to express the benefits of democrat party rule; never a point to show representation of those they intend to rule.

The cruel and unfounded attack on anyone that presents an opinion or desire related to individual and national freedom is reviled excessively, because it counters democrat party agenda: deceive and mislead to impose dictatorial rule, upon the masses, beginning with comfortable slavery.

The liars must continually skirt their agenda, their so-called ideology because it opens doors of knowledge for the masses that have potential to expose the cruel, tyrannical efforts of the democrats and liberals.

I invite any democrat, liberal, or progressive; anyone to offer an argument with more than superficial promises they cannot keep. Please, someone show me the error of my ways. Reveal to me the economics of stealing more and more from the masses to give them more. Please, reveal to me how taking liberties from OUR guaranteed list of liberties, as found in the Bill of Rights, makes us freer, more responsible, better, kinder, or better off in any way. How does taking our liberties give us more liberty?

Show us, please; please present an argument that goes beyond empty, “…hope and change…”. Show us how democracy beyond its capacities of self-governing, makes America safer, more secure, healthier and wealthier. Wealth? YES. Independence is wealth. Wealth is independence. Wealth and independence is security.

The problem, to return to my point about comfortable slavery, is that it never stays comfortable.

History proves, every time, that ruler law and comfortable slavery always degrade to iron-fisted oppression, genocide, and war to eliminate internal strife.

The agenda of the democrat party is to establish itself as an unchallenged oligarchy, and reduce the masses to poverty. This assertion follows the natural flow of mankind’s tendencies.

Monopoly is always innate to survival. Monopoly is instinctual and cognitive. There has never been a ruler that did not watch his or her back for sedition and/or rebellion in close government ranks. How many hundreds, thousands, of rulers throughout history have reigned short terms and lives, ended by close administrators? Survival at the top requires removal of enemies, and potential enemies: monopoly.

The democrat party, liberals, progressives and lobby groups all want this monopoly for their own security. They care not what price others pay, or are forced to pay.

Others have learned from history, ignoring the success of the great American Constitutional Republic, that joining the side of the governing class, through the few means available, does increase one’s lifestyle and survivability. It is a fraud beyond compare that totalitarian rule benefits anyone except the few, literally a handful.

“Writer” mentions conservatives and republicans identify climate change, ”…is that everyone know(s) that climate change is a big lie put out by the liberals to save the planet.” 

Who believes climate change is a lie to trick We, the People into saving the planet? Nobody believes that but millions believe the dem/libs have lied to trick the masses into surrendering rights to a government solution for a fake science propaganda campaign.

“Everyone” does not know what “writer” hopes others will ignorantly accept as truth. Nothing, even dimwit’s sneaky attempt to reinforce a bogus verity by stating it sarcastically, has any conclusive scientific backing. At what point in this observation and science process do dem/lib, global hoaxers inject any science?

Mankind can adjust, and that is what self-governing is. Checks and balances, as found in The Constitution, individual freedoms and security as guaranteed in The Bill of Rights, and separation of powers for, believe it or not, individual rights and freedoms, are the only things keeping all equal before the law. There is no other equality.

What this means is that the dem/lib agenda is really no secret. All history, all evidence from past civilizations shows this degradation to tyranny. It is what the founding fathers spoke of, and for which they instilled checks and balances: checking government.

The liberal/democrat party agenda is as plain as the full moon. Look up, my fellow citizens, and see it for what it is. Compare it against the light of constitutional republic, the balance of individual rights and majority rule; the balance of federal tyranny and states’ rights; the balance of left-wing tyranny and right wing anarchy (the original delineations). Show us; reference any word spoken by a democrat politician that speaks of or defends any of the aforementioned individual guarantees and freedoms. 

What we see with liberals and the democrat party is that change is inevitable, but they constantly try to force change upon others: change they engineer and from which only they benefit.

Again, can a single liberal or democrat politician provide fundamental, principled historical backing for socialism being a beneficial institution for the majority of the citizenry of any country? Did ruthless Russian bolshevism/communism provide freedoms and leisure for Russians, or did it slaughter 30 to 40 million people? Did Maoist communism provide freedoms and security for the Chinese or did it eliminate approximately 60 million people?

More recently we witness the absolute degradation of Venezuelan life and civility because of the irrefutable failure of socialism forced upon Venezuelans. Venezuelans are eating their pets and zoo animals. An oil producing country cannot buy oil now.

Socialism is protectionism. Monopoly tries to protect what it has by continually destroying competition. In unchecked government it is called legislation.

Please, tell us how protectionism works in favor of both the masses and industrialists (see Bastiat, “What is Seen and What Is Not Seen”).

Some commentary with historical data, other than democrat party lies, would certainly help elucidate a cause and effect reason to be forced to social engineering at the hands of those that cannot elucidate an argument beyond hate, but the dem/libs avoid and must avoid all real communication, so no dissertation or elucidation to any degree will ever be forthcoming.

We don’t see Christians forcing their will on others. They coax, intreat, invite and send out missionaries to preach and teach. But there is no religious/political union to force and impose upon the masses as there is with the liberal, dogmatic, religious/political force.

Liberals, progressives, the whitehouse caliphate (Obama administration), and the democrat party proper all work and deceive, lie and fabricate to force change that benefits ruler law in the hands of the democrat party politically elite, at the expense of the masses.

Change is inevitable, but dem/lib/commies have no desire to contribute to mankind by changing themselves to work with others. They would rather force, upon others, controlled change with inherent exploitation.

One such forced change, with built in exploitation, for example, is federal taxation. Taxation, indubitably, is change. It changes the majority’s ability to survive by taking from the majority the fruits of its own labor, and giving it to the ruling minority that distributes based on the ruling minority’s needs: first and always foremost, themselves. This is the hidden fist of ruthlessness and ruler’s law in the democrat party regime. This is the warning conservatives, republic-minded citizens, specifically tea party representatives today, all the way back to our founding fathers, have tried to present to America, Americans, and the world.

We, the People, have control of the fist of ruthless rule, but we are unaware of the ruthless control of our lives that slithers its way into our lives. We cannot identify the pretenses or beneficence of the democrat party because the rhetoric and overwhelming promotion of pretentious just causes and dishonest means propagated endlessly by the democrat party and allies, eventually moves We, the People to relax our grip on ruthless rule.

Forced change, by deception, fraud, and fabrication, IS the democrat party; is democracy.

The change may appear to be comfortable, but it is currently only partially comfortable and cannot mysteriously get any more comfortable, except for the monopolizers of power and force. The liberal media lies about conditions constantly. But the greater danger is not that change is inevitable and that comfortable slavery could somehow, out of anyone’s control, degrade to oppression and genocide of Americans. The greater danger is that it is the very plan of those in the democrat party and their adherents and masters. It is their plan to monopolize power: to force poverty on the masses so that the masses cannot rise up in revolt, thus securing the political elite’s monopoly, wealth, and luxury.

This move to totalitarian control is no mystery. It is no fabrication or theory. These things are never mentioned by liberals, progressives, or democrat party politicos because it educates the masses to the democrat party conspiracy that intends to force America and Americans to total slavery.

As I have stated before, do not be afraid of this word, conspiracy”. It is a part of life. When two people talk about meeting at the mall and doing some shopping, they conspire. 

Part of the communication problem is that “writer’s” lie is complex. It does not represent a smart liar, rather an instinctual level of diabolical cognition. The “writer”, like most, if not all liberals and progressives, is animalistic in that he/she/it cannot exert human virtues and characteristics: faith, trust, and patience being three that separate conscionable beings from instinctual animals.

Show me, my fellow human beings, a part of “writer’s” post that reveals trust in my words from the perspective of historical truth? Can liberal maniac not admit, find a common point? Never has a liberal critic of my posts, “granted” me one point, one truth, or one fact. There is no compromise in animalistic, monopolizing: only total propagation of tyranny.

The truth of the Constitutional Republic, for example, is irrefutable, but the principles instilled place “writer’s” monopolizing desires in jeopardy, so the liberals never speak of Constitutional Republic, for example, in a truthful manner. They cannot allow truth to be attached to anything because truth reveals the dem/lib/bolshevik fraud.