Lucifer-sam writes, “Space is very big and, often, very weird.” Dufus, liar supreme sam continues, “Last week, an image captured by…”

What is an image?

An image? Captured? How does one capture an imagined non-sequitur?

Even nasa admits, every day, they have no actual photos or reality.

Please, take note that the words image and imagine have the same latin root word and mean, “less than real: circa 1200”, ”a piece of statuary; artificial representation that looks like a person or thing,” Also defined as, “reflection in a mirror” , early 14th century.

So a nasa image is either a reflection, an artificial representation, or less than real, but not real.

So nasa’s theories regarding distances are not real. The distance of one is dependent upon the unreal, artificial distances of others. All are dependent upon unreal, imagined, and superficial distances that not only cannot be substantiated, but cannot substantiate anything claimed to be in association. NOTHING is real.

Imagine means visualizing the unreal, “to create something in one’s mind.”

Not a shred of reality to NASA imagination, but who creates these nothings? Who portrays and depicts and represents these artificial creations? People, or “people” do this.

These image creators and liars are evil people, so devious and degenerate, they cannot be considered people or human.

One can see video, actual film, of rocket lift-offs, burning fuel and fire and brimstone; rockets lifting into the sky, perhaps 10 miles or 20 miles, but the connections of these obvious realities to “space”, is absolutely non-existent, and beyond the unknown distance of the cover of the atmosphere to where “space” begins, nothing is real.

I speculate regarding distances and heights. I am free to speculate because nobody, including nasa has a single measurement for substantiating anything.

Please find something! Find an equation or measurement nasa has measured, applied and used to calculate anything.

There is no film in existence of a rocket lifting into the atmosphere beyond what nasa actually allows to be filmed, and more nothing at heights greater than nasa’s allowances.

This is all luciferian black magic, sleight of hand. The rocket disappears from view and most people assume it goes into “space” because people are told that is what happens.

What is the height a rocket reaches before it is gone from view?

If nasa wanted to convince we the people that a rocket travels to “space”, why not use computer technology to direct a telescope to follow it, and get actual film footage? Because it does not happen as the luciferian liars claim.

Imagine you are beside the track, watching a bobsled pass. For how much time of that whole run of two minutes, do you actually see the bobsled go by?

When rockets are launched, for how long do you see any piece of video, as the rocket passes? Did you notice the “rocket” does not leave the visual? How can that be when it zooms past at miles per second? It is imagery, drawn, fabricated to give classically conditioned minds something to believe: fabrications of faith in nasa’s religion.

Unless you are in a craft, or a video camera is in a craft traveling with or following the rocket image, as shown in the video, a camera attached to a point high in the atmosphere, would see the rocket cross its view for a fraction of a second, not what the video shows. Again, what object traveling with the rocket filmed the video “image” of the rocket burning to “space”?

From :13 to :16, of the animation the rocket stays in view without change. Impossible:

Something such as a video camera or CGI animation, follows the so-called rocket into the atmosphere. As film, this video depiction is impossible, as the article states, depiction. Video depiction, as shown, is impossible unless two rockets are launched together, one to film the other.

At highest velocity, the luciferians claim, the rocket escapes the atmosphere traveling 14 miles per second, or 25,200 mph. Doing the math of space theory or atmosphere height theory, where would a video camera need to be to watch a rocket pass it while remaining in view for 4 seconds, without change in size or position? The video is totally bogus, fabricated, imagined and drawn with CGI. That is the only explanation.

Even at an average velocity of only 1/10th the escape velocity of 25,200 mph, the rocket should escape the atmosphere in a matter of seconds, clearly out of range of any constant view for more than a fraction of a second. I am sure one can calculate the velocity derived from so-called force, if one has the thrust measurements of so-called rocket engines.

I am not about to go this deep into the equation, formulae and theorized distance from earth to “space”. You find the equations and measurements nasa claims exist, and report back here. I contend that nothing of the sort exists.

How long does it take for the rocket to reach max velocity, is one question of the whole theory, never shown in full. NEVER!

Even at 1/10th escape velocity of 25,200 mph, it is impossible a rocket could travel without breaking up. You could not even imagine anything traveling at 2,520 mph. The Concorde hit speeds of 1250 mph.

Rockets, we are led to believe, hit maximum speed of 25,200 mph? The acceleration in a 300 to 330 mile window of the atmosphere, would create a g-force that would crush rocks strapped into seats. It is 105 miles per second, according to theory. According to theory, how fast does the world rotate?

Do not forget that the rocket travels at an estimated velocity, not a measured velocity. Nobody, nothing can measure that high speed.

All anybody ever really need do to dissect and thrash stupid nasa, “space” and “globe” theories is to think and ask questions. How do you know that? Can you show me the calculation?

Based on what is that theory or presumption? How does nasa know the escape velocity of any rocket they claim launches into “space”? How then, does nasa know what is needed to escape the atmosphere, and what is the true distance of the height of the atmosphere?

Nothing is known: not a single thing yet magically nasa produces images, depictions and other fake film and photos of disconnected “space”, “space” travel, and moon and sun theorizing.


Think about the garbage you let in your head every day.

Do you watch television? Do you have a favorite sitcom?

What is a sitcom? Situation comedy.

It is a regurgitation of lies from one episode to the next, from series to series, of people trying to get away with something by lying. Somehow pandemic dishonesty is funny, humorous.

The precept for every single sitcom episode is constructed around a lie. Have you not wondered about the consistencies in your lives every day? Are you happy associating daily with dishonesty, dishonest people and deception? Do you look forward to being like those poliwood losers, liars, frauds and extremely stupid “people”?

Someone told a lie, because we are all “just human”; someone tried to deceive a spouse, a family member, or the law, and got caught: and that is funny, day after day, after bloody boring, evil, repetitive episode, and this makes entertainment, humor??

Are you so sub-intellectual you are that easily “entertained”? Sitcoms are not entertainment.

“Modern Family”? Do “they” mean modern collection of dysfunctional idiots that lie and prey on the dumb, you? Do “they” mean morons with semi-intellectual thoughts, living unnatural lives, portrayed as “normal” or “modern”, all fabricated to a predetermined end, every bloody, boring, dishonest episode after episode?

Do you watch dishonest people at work, and find the deceptions funny, smart, intelligent, intellectually stimulating? Do you find it funny and entertaining when someone lies to you, manipulates you, or uses you, like your role models do in your favorite sitcoms?

Another prevalent theme is that men are socially inept, retarded, and challenged, and that it takes a) authority, b) a woman or c) a child to straighten the dumb man’s thinking and actions back to “normal”.

Please do not forget, they are all acting. Do you realize they all follow a premeditated script: a plan to connect effects (the end) to unnatural and disconnected causes?

There is a fabricated end and the means do not waver, although the script writes in a little bit of internal conflict, detraction.

The ending is never “normal”. Can you not see that these scripts are predetermined, for their gain, your loss and pseudo entertainment?

These are stupid people pretending to be smart.

Again, you are entertained by boring, droning, abnormal deception?

The scripts are written to show men are dummies, authority is pure, presumed innocent and smarter, and women are just a step below authority. Search maternal incest. Poliwood elevates everybody above the white male.

Authority is government, according to poliwood.

Which “Star Trek” series did you prefer? Are you insane? It is all fake: situation dramas in a studio, “sitdram” if you will, prefabricated to an end for their gain: repetition, curiosity, and false hope for you.

Who has been in space? Astronauts have been caught lying.

Nobody has been in space! It is all a construct.

Start looking, study the composites, the images and look for an actual photo. They don’t even try to call anything a photo. Even “pictures” of storms and hurricanes are graphics, computer generations and fancy drawings: drama in science. They admit it.

Nobody, not one single person has provided a photo of earth from space.

Think about it.

We, man, can dive to the Marianna Trench in specially built submarines with windows to see and take photos, done under incredible pressure. But for some weird, strange reason nobody can make a window in a so-called space-craft, with all the technology available to us, to take a photo of earth from space.

And how did “they” determine there was such great resistance on “spacecraft” when re-entering the atmosphere, that it caused unbelievable heat? At the speeds “they” claim rockets re-enter, and in such a short sprint to the surface atmosphere, and beginning the descent in very thin air, how can friction from air molecules cause such great heat? How hot do jets get as they fly hundreds and, in some cases, thousands of miles per hour.

Has anyone seen a rocket hit velocity to leave the gravity of the earth? The levels of the atmosphere are:

troposphere: ground level




From the surface to the end of the thermosphere is approximately 400 miles, we are told.

How much resistance caused by particles of air and in the air would we find in the highest layer, where there is very very thin air? What affects the spacecraft’s re-entry?

Where are the formulae?

If there is no resistance in space, because there is no particles to interfere with movement, why do the spacecraft not open parachutes immediately upon hitting the thermosphere, or before?

What slows the rocket’s re-entry before the chutes are deployed? Air? If anything the “rockets” should speed up due to increasing gravity as the “rocket” gets closer to the pull.

How does air stop a rock from falling? How does air stop or slow a bullet falling back to earth, and why does that bullet not melt?

Why has NASA never had aircraft high in the sky taking photos or video of “spacecraft” launching or settling?

There are no photos of anything. There are computer generations, drawings with colors, and models: drawings and computer generated images.

There are composites, graphics, drawings and generated CGI. See for yourselves. Did Bozo-bezos or Shatner take a photo?

Back to the physics. I admit, I am speculating. What have you done?

400 miles to “space”, 300 miles of it in very, very thin air. So thin there is no way it causes even slight heat due to resistance of particulate.

A 100 mile drop to the surface remains. A “spacecraft” traveling at thousands of miles per hour spends only seconds in the 100 miles from the surface of the plane(t) to the troposphere.

Has anyone ever seen a calculation of heat due to friction? Where does one find friction coefficients for the very thin air political scientists theorize exists in upper atmospheric levels? 

Could the outside pressure on a deep sea craft be any greater than the internal pressure that tries to force out a window in space? It is minuscule even without the comparison. Air, in a very tight small space produces very little pressure, no pressure comparatively to the pressure of hundreds of atmospheres in the depths of the oceans.

Oh, but “they” claim glass melts in re-entry. Nope!

There are all kinds of compounds science has produced to prevent melting.

Not a chance any of this gobbledegoop science is measured.

Could we, with superior technology, not design glass to withstand high temperatures to take photos? Of course we can. Yet, none exists because “space, like everything you are fed, is a fallacy and fantasy: phantasy, phantasia and phantasm; not reality, a story; a phantom.

Even the most recent trip into “space”, Bozo-bezos and Captain James T. Kirk, of the ‘real” Starship Enterprise (William Shatner, an actor), went into space for “…a few seconds”.

But wait. No, they did not go into space. The most recent jaunt, with the greatest technological advances, could not go into space and could not take a single photo?

That’s it?

But wait, there is another element to this curiosity. How fast do missiles travel? Why is there no concern for their nose-cones melting, especially considering they travel as fast as “rocketships”, all in the denser parts of the atmosphere?

With all the technology; all the improvements in computers and controls and communications, Shatner and bozo only managed a jaunt into the stratosphere, for a few seconds?

WAIT! Stratosphere, not space? YES! They did not make it to the thermosphere, the highest level of the atmosphere. They did not make it to the mesosphere either, barely left the surface, 30 miles at best.


The “NEWS” article in question, many outlets in fact, openly state the craft entered the stratosphere only for a few seconds. No need for worries about heat, really. No mention of it. The stratosphere makes up only about 30 miles of the overall theorized 400 miles atmosphere, basically 8% of the theorized heights of the atmospheric strata.

All the dementocrats know the scams, they volunteered to exploit and violate, YOU.

I go into detail regarding some of the inconsistencies and lies, outright silly fabrications, of just about everything.

I have written and published, in this last incarnation of my site, over 580 articles. If it is all just silly opinion, like this commentary might be, then it is at least organized and professionally presented. I do have some credibility. As Mao stated, “There is a quality to quantity”, and nobody will argue that I have quantity.


Barnett: “The earth’s shape is not a theory. it’s been known for millenia and has been quantified to closer and closer tolerances as time and scientific advances progress. FE? Bwahaa…. It’s nonsensical drivel..or dribble for those that foam it out their mouthes.”

Scores and scores of fake profiles all doing nothing but post fake-science, amazingly all in favor of globe-theory earth. Something is surely going on that brings so many ignorant goons together to propagate so many, and all the same, lies.

My Reply:

Known by whom? What tolerances? Barnett has no idea, surely regurgitating spew from his/her/its master handler. Again, Roger, tell us, what tolerances? What is the margin of error? Tell us what scientific progress it is that uses CGI and drawings to make a fake photo of earth, when nobody has ever been “in space”? You lying pos. Known by whom, Aristotle, Heracles, Herodotus, Jason and the Argonauts, Dustin the wind? What a loser! Nobody has known for millennia. What a sewage-sucking fraud! It is that simple.

For all reading this, by many things bolshevik-dick wrote, you can surely see how ignorant and un-scientific everything of dick-roger’s comment is. But, especially and specifically obvious is this: how does one “quantify” something that is not a quantity? 

Known for millennia? Who are you trying to fool? Even the dumbest of dumb, you anti-science, scientific methodology retards cannot be so stupid to totally ignore reality AND history. Are you really so stupid and grotesquely, fat, ugly and lying!

Your stupid pretense (millennia) is not only a stretch of gross magnitude, considering the Bible has been around for millennia, but even you, a real pseudo-person cannot be that stupid to ignore the reality that globe-theory is a theory. Do you realize that when someone says a word they mean it, like theory means theory?

But it is okay. I get where you are coming from and I have a picture of your “profile” and will post it to my site, with my reply, a shit-kicking for you for all to see, and beyond so others can see just how fake and politically motivated, sub-human you filthy bolshevik NASA agents are. You lie like a rat you filthy rotten agent provocateur.