Now, finally, open the article, read and watch the animation.

The title of the article reads, “the sun just did something weird, and 3 other space stories you may have missed this week”.

The sun did something weird? How does nature that can only act natural, do something weird? How dumb. How is nature weird? How does the sun, totally untouched and unaffected by earth become weird?

What are the pre-test conditions and data, and post-test conditions, from which nasa makes comparisons to state the sun did something different or weird? Pre-test and post test, science, is absolutely missing from this goofy article. How utterly ridiculous can nasa luciferians get?

The subscript reads, “An oddball new exoplanet, small but significant steps toward the future of spaceflight and a mystery in the Kuiper Belt.”

“Oddball”? Wow, that is so scientific it is scary. What a stupid thing to write. How does a thing without feet step? What stupid clichés can only follow stupid “people”, 

A “new exoplanet”? A new planet discovered? “Exo”, as in external? There can only be an “exo” if there is an “endo”, or internal. And what determines ”exo” and “endo”? No comparators, no examples, no parameters or definitions, just stupid words and pieces tossed about to confuse and create education chaos. This is bloody, evil deception.

See how the luciferian liars toss in terms and words that mean nothing so they can sound smart and expert, so they can lie with impunity and control you first with fear and then LAW that follows your response to fear they create.

How much farther from earth than the sun, is this theorized planet?

If all nasa can provide is an animated depiction of the moon from earth, while the sun is even more out of the realm of visual possibility, then a new planet, even more distant than that, cannot be seen or discovered.

How utterly science-retarded can nasa get?

If the sun is impossible to see because the moon is impossible to see, then some crazy, theorized, fabricated, imagined new “exoplanet”, farther away, is absolutely impossible, and absolutely impossible to film or photograph.

The subscript reads, “An oddball new exoplanet… in the Kuiper Belt.”

There is no Kuiper belt because there is no measurement or substantiated distance. There is no relationship of these heavenly bodies therefore they do not exist. The distance to the sun is theorized to be 400 times the distance of the moon from earth, but the distance of moon from earth is not calculated so none of what follows, the whole of globe theory and nasa, is not substantiated and does not exist.

Sure, go ahead, build a house on a pretend foundation, and you don’t have a house, an attic, a garage. You don’t have walls, windows, doors and heat. It is impossible to build something on nothing.

Nasa and globe theory is all so much building on nothing. Show us the calculation of the distance of earth to moon. From that, maybe, one could extrapolate information, a measurement or two, to plug into an equation to calculate something from that foundation. Nothing!

I can line up 3 yard sticks, then four yardsticks at a right angle to the three, and then aim five yardsticks from the end of the three yard sticks to the end of the four yard sticks and create a right angle triangle. This is known as a 3, 4, 5 right triangle. It can be used to create a right angle for building something. You can see it. You can watch the creation of it and how it works. You can see the application of it in making a 90 degree angle out of measurements that can only come together in one way.

There is absolutely nothing of the sort, and less in partiality that lends credibility to anything luciferian nasa fabricates. Show us the one point fixed in space, not “space”, from which other variables are derived, measured and used to calculate anything? Nasa still does not have definitive distance of the end of the atmosphere, or beginning of “space” so the distance of earth to moon is impossibly known.

But, don’t believe me. Look at the animation. Look at the words of the article itself, written, fabricated by science-retard, sam matthews.

These yahoo”NEWS” writers are so dishonest and evil, they do not deserve capitalized names, being liars and devils that deserve no human recognition for their crimes against truth, reality, and humanity.

CRAIGSLIST REPLY, APRIL 12, 2021, “love the sound of magaTURD whimper”

Re: “love the sound of magaTURD whimper”

The title of the bolshevik post tells enough for my reply.

Bolshevik-dick posts a picture of someone, maybe his/her/its dad and writes a cartoon caption (dem/lib reality) that claims,…wait.

Is this a newspaper article? No. Wait, is this a commentary in a credible news source, such as a newspaper? No.

This is just another hate-motivated slander against republicans, conservatives, and constitutionalists, by unsubstantiated headline cliché. It is nothing more than hate and assault from a screwed-in-the head psychopathic progressive/bolshevik backed piece of crap.

Did bolshevik-dick provide a link, a reference, a quote? Hmmm, wonder why.

When I quote Abraham Lincoln, for example, I might actually put parentheses or quotation marks around the words. I might reference an event such as the Gettysburg Address: one of the shortest and most genius speeches ever made. It starts like this, “Four score and seven years ago our forefathers brought forth upon this continent, a new nation…”.

Do you see how I made a note that those words were not mine; that they came from another source? I might search the internet and find an actual photo of Honest Abe, and add the date.

I might add the context of the speech with the place and date and significance of both. I might add that Gettysburg was a turning point in the Civil War.

But, all the bolshevik dicks can add is as many as possible attempts to ridicule, insult, intimidate and add more hate.They never, NEVER add references to science, honest people, or those who have accomplished something of import. All they do is quote each others’ lies, and claim credibility with sub-standard, sub-intelligent terse headlines.

What a buffoon.

You, dear reader, remember all this in future cartoons and cartoon captions that reference nothing. If you do not check everything and get to the truth on every point, you deserve to be deceived, and the first on the bolshevik/progressive dementocrat  chopping block.