OVERWHELMING PROPAGANDA BUT TRUTH IS ALWAYS FOUND IN THE LIES.

Who the hell does the American media and the U.S. Government (not to be confused with the Government of the Republic of The United States) think they are, presuming guilt of Vladimir Putin, Russian troops and oligarchs?

This subversion of justice and due process is dangerous, contributing to the impending bolshevik/banker bloodlust and genocide the media is fomenting.

What the hell do the wealthy people of Russia have to do with political rule? Nothing! Who makes being rich and Russian somehow evil? The evil of presumption of guilt is astounding and deadly.

You might know presumption of  guilt by different names and terms: lynching, mobocracy, the inquisition, and democracy.

The stakes have been drastically increased with the western, dementocrat/bolshevik media’s injection of chemical, nuclear and biological warfare “warnings”. They are threatening us by their accusations and unjust guilt pronouncements of guilt agains Vladimir Putin and Russian forces. They have proved nothing, absolutely nothing and yet they propose to execute punishment. The lack of due process is devilish.

Do you understand that there is no proof or video, or radio, or photo of Russian troops doing anything the media claims? In fact, there is proof it is the opposite.

Who the hell do these bastards think they are, presuming guilt, convicting by media prosecution, actually executing government/bolshevik/banking sanctions and oppression and seizure?

Who is presumed guilty and then sanctioned and stalked?

When and how did oligarchy become a reality and illegal? Who the hell does the media think it is making wealth something to be exposed and punished? If “oligarchy” is damnable or punishable then why is the western, American/bolshevik media not looking at and condemning the dementocrat party/social media giants’ rich: zuckerberg, bezos, gates, soros, rockefellers, vanderbilts, CNN, MSNBC, Rothschlds and others?

Where is the connection of Government rule in Russia with Russian wealth? How does the globalist bolshevik megalomaniac media connect presumed violence and destruction with Russian wealth?

Do you follow this? This is all based on a predicate that because media makes the claim, it must be true. Nothing could be further from truth than media reporting honestly or accurately, especially when media is owned by international banking angry Russia has left its control. I posted a photo of an article in which the World Bank claims Russia is defaulting on its loans. This conflict is all about money, for the west and globalists, and survival for Russia, Belarus, and a handful of other countries.

The media makes the most dastardly claims and presumes the worst of those countries the world bank sanctions because of potential financial independence. Do you see this process as lacking more than just a few principles and elements?

The media/government collusion is currently bringing chemical and nuclear war into this presumption because they are planning genocide, using chemical and nuclear warfare against Russia.

A simple report already clarifies that Russian troops have been exposed to radiation. Russian troops are not so dumb as to dig trenches in a radiated forest, as the corrupt media reported. 

By numerous arguments, some of which I have already made, there is no way Russian troops even went close to Chernobyl. I presented one photo showing tanks guarding, blocking access to Chernobyl.

Certainly the Russian military had no reason to go there, unless Ukrainian troops were dug in there themselves, or chemical or nuclear facilities were in operation there, in which case Russian troops would have certainly, irrefutably been protected in proper warfare gear, or stayed away.

It is unconscionable how media claims Russian forces are shelling civilian targets but would not shell Chernobyl, if it were a threat.

How easy to go around Chernobyl, if Ukrainian troops were not in the vicinity.

From every perspective, invading and taking Chenobyl is illogical and suicidal, and was not done.

LIES, lies, lies, of the media, show us the opposite is true.

You are driving down the road, and get pulled over by a police officer. He cuffs you and puts you in the back seat with no explanation just a threat that you must  obey. He then pulls out a sign and puts your vehicle up for sale right there in the street, while you sit in the back seat of the car, waiting to be told what the charge is.

You try to ask what the charge is and you are ignored while the media interviews the cop.

Where is the judge, you ask.

What judge?

Where is the accusation, the accuser, the court, the affidavit or sworn statements? Who, what, how is this happening?

I did nothing wrong. You protest, ‘I am just a working man. What is my crime?’

Well, sir, we, the media and I, noticed you are driving a very expensive car and we believe you support the renegade democrat party.

‘On what do you base this, who said so?’, you ask.

We also note you are wearing expensive jewelry and probably have money in secret offshore bank accounts.

But answer my questions, What is my crime, who are my accusers, what is your proof I am doing anything wrong, and who made you prosecutor, judge and executioner?

This is where we find the media today. The media/police officer combination would refuse to provide proof or a connection to any claims they make, but further point out crimes Russia did not commit, or to which there is no connection. The cop ignores requests for due process but states, ’you are also driving in a neighborhood where you do not live.’

Where is the proof that Russian people with wealth are involved in government? Where is the formal accusation according to due process?

Where is the proof that Russian wealthy are somehow involved with the Russian government in the war, the invasion, funding or anything that might unjustly connect them to an alleged unjustified military enterprise? What bloody, lying bolshevik business is it of the media, that cannot tell a truth to save their lives?

Do you see this? If the globalist/dementocrat, banker/bolshevik media can accuse and take without due process someone’s fortunes and lives in a foreign country, they can do it anywhere and to anyone, including you. In fact, you, living free in the freest country in the world, are the target.

Given that this is, and has been for millennia the process by which tyranny seizes totalitarian control, it is hard to refute that this is the goal of dementocrat government/media conglomerate today. Presumption of guilt leads to subterfuge of due process. In fact, co-opting and destruction of due process is the means and short term goal for the primary goal: plunder, punishment for and elimination of the innocent.

Maybe I am wrong, that plunder and execution of resistance to world banker control is not the actuality in Ukraine. But, loss of presumption of innocence does have a cost and price. The cost is that it could happen to YOU. I claim it is the goal.

We do see it unfolding in America. Do you want to take the chance that presumption on a world scale will not reach you? Do you want to take any chance considering someone, something is killing innocent civilians in Ukraine?

Where, where, where is the basis for any claim the corrupt, bolshevik-controlled media makes?

Is it illegal being Russian? Is it illegal being wealthy?

Is the media attacking wealthy political people in the U.S.A.? We have real oligarchs, the dementocrats and deep state republicans who have wealth that cannot be attributed to simple pay for representative work.

Where, where, where?

The media, in just five weeks has created crimes of anything Russian.

The fabrications based on secret, subjugating, world bolshevik/banker tactics are ruthlessly and irrefutably evil.

Do you think you can suddenly trust corrupt, dementocrat/globalist bolshevik/banker media?

Where is the judgement, conviction, and process in this subversion?

For what unlisted, unconnected crimes, does sit-at-home media suddenly have power to convict? Where are the witnesses that witness criminal enterprise against Ukrainians, Americans, YOU next?

How is it that you, the masses, in America have accepted the corrupt media’’s claims, for starters, but worse accepted other unconstitutional, anti-constitutional, and anti- Bill of Rights, fabrications? Are you following the corrupt progressive/liberal/bolshevik media or maybe the corrupted, fake conservative bolshevik media?

It is clear most people do not understand how evil seizes control, how tyranny becomes tyranny.

What gives evil persons power over others?

Do you not understand the principle of divido et impero? In English we know it as divide and conquer, but that is an incorrect translation.

The quote is more accurately translated, divide and command, or control.

The media and dementocrats have divided America into many groups and factions.

From every avenue the world banker/bolsheviks identify groups to attack, vilify, exploit, plunder and control. It must be accomplished by a few simple rules. The public outcry or attack must be obvious so it appears the democracy of voting ill of a group by a majority, is accepted.

When government/media (oligarchy) has a “mandate” against one group, the law follows, and the same law is purposely open so it dictates against all. This is why every seemingly small incursion against anyone’s rights is so vile.

When you advocate suspension of principles and rights against another, law follows that includes you.

This applies on larger scales such as presumption of guilt and the majority support of ignorant Americans presuming Russia’s guilt: evil democracy at work.

Are you so ignorant or dumb?

Law that sanctions, exploits, and controls even one small cross-section, is always turned on all cross-sections and groups. That is the goal of divide and conquer, and command.

Those who advocate oppression, control, and plunder of one group are caught in the same legal trap they set for and in which they ensnare, others.

This group to be eventually and ultimately ensnared, YOU, is being used to ensnare others, to get to you.

The dopey, almost totally stupid media has made an erroneous distinction of left-wing ideologies (including all parties and party factions), against the balanced middle.

The world, banker/bolshevik media has gone further, executing and enforcing attacks on principles. How does the media act so absolutely complicit with globalist/banker government, unless premeditated and organized?

You might not see the devilish process. All the same presumptions of guilt, all the same suspension of rights; all the same hate and vilification; all the same media-generated and government condemnation and punishment; so many similarities, all suppressing and decimating rights, principles and knowledge of the existence itself of due process of justice.

Did you know, for example, that America was founded as a Constitutional Republic, the balanced middle between the two extremes: totalitarian control on the left and no centralized, no unification, anarchy, on the right?

Just this revelation for you should have you looking, studying and searching for other truths with which the grotesque, dementocrat/bolshevik/deep state media has bamboozled and controlled you. 

The world banker/bolshevik government-media has created divisions for divided attacks on the principles and traditions of freedom. The world banker/bolshevik government-media has created divisions for divided attacks by one group on another.

How many laws on the books, created separate from congress, do you know about? How many are there?

The globalist goal is to peg every single person into a group, and have all groups eventually included in the laws against the originally vilified group.

The truth in the lies is that a massive collusion of entities from local media to globalist world banking powers and puppet governments (The U.S. Government, for example) have all thrashed, trashed and removed from the minds of the people of the world, principles and cautions against totalitarian, centralized control.

This desolation of principles (and traditions) of freedom and equality before the law, has taken root in America, begun decades ago, but exponentially increased with the thrashing of principle by the media’s incorrigible, unsubstantiated and presumptuous attacks on Russia.

All that Russia gets, will come back to the U.S.A., YOU.

The first thing we do is not believe a thing the liberal and conservative media tell us about the war in Ukraine.

It is not a war.

In spite of years of warning it started with an estimated 125,000 Russian troops. Today I watched a video claiming there were 200,000 troops in Ukriane. That is a 60 percent disparity.

All the pictures, videos and photos of destroyed Ukrainian cities and property has no connection to Russian involvement or execution. There are forces in Ukriane from other globalist/bolshevik controlled countries: America being the biggest contributor to attacks on civilians.

Remember, the U.S. Military may be made up of Americans, but it is owned by the world bolshevik bankers that control the illegal U.S Government. The military is not the military of We, the people. The U.S. military is ant-representative, anti-Republic. Look for yourself and be open to reality or the reality you do not see will be brought back to you. I have seen no videos of rockets hitting targets in Ukraine’s cities but I have seen video of explosions from inside buildings.

The first curious bombing is at about the one minute mark.

Even the “reporter” says it was a bombing.

Watch and look for yourselves and you will see video cameras focused on particular locations and buildings, and explosions magically captured at the right place and right time, and the explosions are often, if not always, exploding out from inside, like a bomb placed inside. It is not a missile. The following link provides an example of one such explosion caught on video. You will have to find the event yourself. Take the time to look, for your own security from propaganda.

In all videos and reports you will see presumptions of guilt and fabrication.

I watched a a podcast by an ex-military man, looking at media video of the war in Ukriane, and the men in the video were all speaking English, all were Americans and the host, the dummy, the moron of the podcast was mildly shocked for a moment and then proceeded.

This whole war is rigged to manipulate you.

Say no, speak it loudly.

Pass these reports on to friends.

More exposés to follow.

THE STRENGTH OF AMERICA

I whipped this off in about an hour: thoughts I had been entertaining for some time and surely will rattle around in this skull, and result in editing. This is one article to which I surely will return.

Some would argue that the strength of America is the dollar.  Some claim it is the Constitution or the Constitution of the Republic (two different Constitutions). We could say the strength of America is the military, the Navy, or technology. We could make a good argument for the strength of America being the free market, economy, or the wealth of the nation.

We cannot claim the strength of America is democracy.

We cannot claim the strength of America is gold and silver backed money because the dollar is not backed by precious metals.

We cannot make a claim that the military defends and makes America strong, or that the hundreds of millions of firearms owners make America strong, although armed Americans are an imposing deterrent.

All these things and more are results of one principle not found anywhere else in the world or in the history of the world.

The strength of America is presumption of innocence.

The American dollar is backed by nothing, except faith, if I can use that word to describe presumed trust, in others.

American business is backed by trade of worthless paper backed by trust in fellow Americans’ work, promises, and ethics.

What is the dollar worth? What does the dollar represent? The dollar, a paper note of currency, like all currencies, is a bank note to represent a certain amount of gold or silver. But the dollar is no longer backed by gold or silver. By what, then, is the dollar backed?

The note, to the banking “system” is a note of debt. When th bank calls in paper currency it expects something of value, your car, your home, your first born.

But, to Americans, the dollar has value. It is a conundrum that the dollar has value when it literally does not, or in reality has negative value, being  a potential liability.

The dollar is backed by debt, imposed debt but in spite of that, Americans still trade paper dollars, representing notes of debt, for goods and services.

Americans trust Americans enough to trade paper for something of physical value. This is true in all countries, except Russia.

Libya tried to break free of international debt, but was attacked and brought back into servitude: the clinton/obama oligarchy. Syria is in the process of escaping, backed by Russia, Putin taking time in long open interviews with Russia media to explain the world banking slve-trade system to Russians.

The situation regarding the Russian invasion is not what the media, backed by globalist, international banking, allows to be correctly, truthfully, or realistically reported.

Presumption of innocence is the foundation to everything. Presumption of innocence is fundamental to civility and society. No nation in the history of the world has had justice for all, civility between all citizens guaranteed, and the innumerable, endless positive results of law that presumes innocence.

This law is under attack by the globalist, bolshevik/bankers, in America called progressives woking in and through the dementocrat government and corrupt bolshevik/liberal media.

The Amendments are guarantees that presumption of innocence is primary and foundational for all. Presumption of innocence and equality before the law is not a topic to simply mention.

Presumption of innocence is unnoticed in everything we do, like scientific methodology.

Scientific methodology is simple cause and effect. I stand under the shower, turn on the tap with the blue colored glass handle, and I get blasted with cold water.

Presumption of innocence gives rise to being nice. For example, how many times do you see someone cut you off driving your vehicle, and you chase him or her down to make him or her pay? We stay calm, presume it was a mistake, and cray on.

That is all under attack by evil people who want to press you, all of us, into global, financial and tyrannical servitude.

When you pay for something, stop and think, for a moment, about the person, your fellow American, to whom you are engaged in a free-market exchange of goods and services. The medium is the paper, but the transaction is you, I, and all of us.

Please, study your Bill of Rights and realize they are for all of us, an even playing field where a dollar is worth a dollar, your labor is not for free, and everyone you know and do not know, being a sentient human being deserves presumption of innocence, until you have contrary information.

Please learn the deep significance of OUR Bill of Rights and Presumption of Innocence and everyone’s right to defend themselves.

The world is being dragged to destruction, tyranny and hell by the bolshevik/banker elitists. All who join the woke, the progressives, the dementocrats, the establishment republicans, the corrupt media, are contributing to world struggle and genocide.

Resist and say, and DO, NO!

MORE REALITY: ANTIFA, BLM AND BOLSHEVIK/PROGRESSIVE COWARDS

My reply to a Craigslist post, October 1, 2020.

Bolshevik-dick took everything and played the bolshevik/marxist tactic to invert it all. To say the rat-brain twisted everything, or disfigured everything, is not quite descriptive enough: invert better describes the assault. Flip-flop is also good.

The purpose of terror, antifa and BLM, is to make the innocent pay in random terror attacks and give the guilty impunity, while creating fear of the unknown amongst the general population, all if possible.

The German Nationalist Party started before antifa immigrated to Germany from France and Russia. Agents of marxism were in every country, including the U.S.A.

In America antifa, the cowards, claimed they were progressives. Progressives are actually regressive. The goal is to reduce 95 percent of mankind to a feudal system wherein a handful of overlords can ravage and savage at will. Luxury is not the question, rather a bye product for the politically connected, and no one else. Sub-human living standards is the goal, for we, the masses, while the few, the political elite, living and ruling from their own democracies, dictating across the world, live in comfort, off the labors of We, the People.

Germany was at war almost immediately after the Great War of 1914 to 1918.

In the Ballfour Declaration, the world’s Jews, but not really, declared war on Germany.

I stated it that way for a reason. Leading Jews declared War on Germany and the world’s banking system blacklisted Germany.

Anyone might have heard, even though real history has been diluted and changed, that at one point it took a wheelbarrow of German money, the Deutsche Mark, to buy a loaf of bread. It is true.

I studied German history from a German language perspective. The amount of recorded documentation that refutes mainstream education and history is astounding.

Germany developed National Socialism. Socialism, even the socialists and dem/lib progressives in America admit, is LEFT-WING. How does socialism, with “national” attached somehow, mysteriously become right wing? Socialism is socialism, far left no matter the variety.

Fascism is not a form of nationalism. It is a form of Socialism. The equation then, is how does fascism, a form of National Socialism, get moved to far right when it is the same as communism, socialism and bolshevism, except for one added element?

You see, the progressives, the bolsheviks that survived through Khazarian cleansing, to become Jewish, are not really Jewish. Some historians have traced bolsheviks to Khazarians, to ancient Babylon and the practices of human, particularly child, sacrifice.

This history must surely be shocking to many people, but consider this. It is well known that in ancient Babylon and other countries and civilizations, child sacrifice was a priestly duty.

Priests of Moloch, quite prevalent throughout Mesopotamia, were the agents of ruthless child and adult sacrifice.

Popular for the Priests of Moloch was a beast made of steel, empty inside for firewood with a bellows in the back. The idol had a mechanism so the arms, at rest were  outstretched to hold, and a lever in the back to raise the arms to drop the sacrifice into the mouth.

The fire was stoked and aired so the hands, arms and body of the idol were red hot. A living baby was placed in the hands/arms, the lever raised the arms and the child was swallowed, burned alive.

It is well known that King Solomon was a Priest of Moloch. 800 wives and concubines. Where did all his children go?

Shocking, yes. Moloch was a product of the sickest evil in mankind, and it survived through Khazaria, to Europe though bolshevism and to America as progressivism.

Of course you can say, there is no child sacrifice today, there is no priesthood of Moloch and this is all far-fetched history.

There is child sacrifice today. Just because you don’t see it does not mean it does not exist.

Laura Silsby was caught abducting children from Haiti. The woman is closely connected to the Clinton foundation. The headline is “Wiki Bombshell…”

“As we’ve reported here over the past 48 hours, details have emerged from the FBI’s reopened investigation into Hillary’s emails found on Anthony Weiner’s laptop that SERIOUS ADDITIONAL crimes were under investigation, unrelated to the email server case, involving among other things, child trafficking. Wikileaks has just released perhaps the biggest Bombshell yet, spreading like wildfire across the web, revealing emails “showing how the Clintons supported child stealer Laura Silsby” including an email “where they are literally pricing how much it costs to transport children”.

One question, of many, we should ask is for how long had they been doing it? Where are the other children?

Of course there is no open governmental allowance of child sacrifice, but to think there are not those kinds of demented people living today is childish cowardice.

You, every person reading this, knows there are the sickest, sub-humans amongst us who would do all kinds of sick demented things if they could get away with them. Have you ever known a neighbor who tortured animals? Girls and women have the same rate of “anti-social personality disorder” psychopathy and sociopathy.

Antifa, the cowards, originated with the bolsheviks who slaughtered 30 million Russians: a hell of a large sacrifice to their gods, don’t you think?

I can take this commentary many directions, including an exposé of progressives in America admitting to ruthless practices and planned genocide: Margaret Sanger and Albert Pike. I will stay with the antifa definition, however. Sanger, advocating American black genocide. Hell of a child sacrifice, through abortions, for moloch! Sorry, strayed, just a bit. 

Marxism is terrorism, chaos, ruthless, random terror. It is antifa.

You can do a search and find the Ballfour Declaration. You can do a search and find volumes of information about the illegal FED in America, how the democrat/progressives took over our banking system; how Jackson, Lincoln and Kennedy fought the international bankers. There is just so much information it will overwhelm you. Antifa is fraudulent, as is BLM. They are violent wings of democrat party fascism. Germany’s 1930s fascism was NOT ruthless bolshevik marxism.

I must inject that I struggle referring to democrats as fascists. Originally fascism saved Germany. It was tough on Germany but the country, the people of Germany were under and attack from the whole world. Truly, in my opinion, the real killers of the 20th century were the bolsheviks. 

Germany was under siege, dying, as a nation. This hatred for Germany, even though it was Germany that allowed Jews to immigrate, was the recipient of misdirected worldwide hatred. Who misdirected it is a commentary for another day. Suffice it to say some research on your part will begin your enlightenment and liberation. Start with YOUR Bill of Rights and find another in any other country, at any time in the history of the world.

The whole thing, all aspects of the period from 1900 to present has been flipped to hide the evils of progressive/democrats in America.

When you hear Pelosi, for example, pronounce “our democracy is under attack”, she means the democracy of the democratic party. There is democracy in America. It I the democrat party’s democracy, excluding everyone not closely associated.

America is a Constitutional Republic: a self-governing, representative republic. The democrats, however, have their own government, their democracy and from that democracy, wherein they vote amongst themselves for their own gain, they dictate to the country what they want.

It just so happens that they could not be seen as benefactors without a corrupt media that foments and propagates “democracy” and the democrat party as benevolent. They feed international bankers blood money from Americans. Moloch worship?

Germany came together. They had a leader, a dictator, true. What would you do under assault from the world?

They rearmed. Germany actually had quite a cultural boom: German, as it should be.

Culture was under attack because culture is attached to traditions and traditions are law and order. This surely is not something taught in schools these days.

Germany let Jews leave, with their money. The idea that Germany did so many evils against Jews is an absolute fallacy.

Find and read the Ballfour Declaration, and related aspects.

The commies in Russia, U.K. and France saw Germany as the gem of nations to take. U.S.A. was not as impressive as Germany then.

Antifa sent agents to do what antifa does, foment violence, chaos nd random terror. There was no violent arm of the German Workers National Socialist Party until antifa invaded. The Brown shirts came to existence to counter antifa violence. They won. Of course Germans would win, quite a disciplined people. The world flip-flopped the situation, for almost 100 years now. The saviors of Germany were the brown shirts fighting in the streets against rioters, looters and subversives: antifa. Does this sound eerily like Portland, Seattle, New York, St Louis? It should. It is the same organization doing the same things as the bolsheviks did to steal Russia from Russians, and then slaughter them. The world bolsheviks, ruling antifa, BLM marxists, and the democrat party, plan the same for America. Republicans are marked.

You have got to laugh at the brazen stupidity of bolshevik-dick’s fabrication. The definition of “fascism” sounds an awful lot like communism, socialism, and marxism. It is all the same. It is all totalitarian, left-wing.

Even dick’s claim that WWII Japan was fascist is laughable. Honestly, I laugh when I think of an emperor, a totalitarian ruler, such as a monarch ruling with totality, being placed on the so-called far right as a fascist, when in reality there is nothing anarchist about fascism, socialism, or Japanese emperor rule. Bolshevik-dick is historically, cause-and-effect, retarded.

Bolsheviks, those who see the world through blood-stained eyes, or hopes of executing violence against others with impunity, are the sickest goons in existence. Bolshevik-dick, the liar from the east coast; the bastard pig that tried to recruit me to write for his/her/its think-tank democracy, is a paid, sub-intelligent traitor to We, the People. No democrat or politics-as-usual politician is going to condemn this mutt, or antifa or BLM. They are all part of the collusion.

Did dick actually try to show Austria as a fascist state as well? Austria was taken over by the Germans. They are all Germanic, speak the same language, have the same cultural backgrounds and culture, and most Austrians welcomed Germany’s lead.

Do you see what the bolshevik/agents of the democrat party are doing?

They are twisting and maiming everything to create knowledge chaos. Random terror is a horrific tool of government tyranny. People are afraid, they get anxious, and plead with government to save them, while it is unrepresentative, governmental, organized crime ravaging them.

Destroy representative, local police, already have Black Lives Marxists (Bolshevik Lives Matter) and panty-fa in place, and government claims it can save the cities and provide safety and, la-voila, a violent, storm-trooper police force for a very small political elite democracy has control of everything, and everyone.

We need to get in the streets now, and take out antifa and BLM, one way or another, or it will be you and I, and your democratic/liberal neighbors as well.

Who puts together a rioting police force, and then does not use it when control is gained? 

The democrat/bolsheviks and marxist/progressives are purposely overwhelming the police forces everywhere and hope to leave a void that can be filled with a growing army of rioters, looters, anti-social subversives, psychos and sociopaths through and through, and the goal is you, 3/4 of America, eliminated.

What do you, yes you, dear reader, think the goal of antifa, the bolsheviks and the supranational Jewish league’s goal was in Russia? You have to start putting this together and think. Why are the marxist democrats building violent forces right before our eyes. Random terror includes and needs an element of bombastic rule. It is the master/slave relationship wherein the slave is the slave when the subject admits he or she has a master. One cannot admit it without seeing the master rule.

We need to raid the BLM offices and hang them for treason.

Did dick try to include Belgium? Laugh.

What a moron. Unbelievable.

Someone, please, a faithful supporter of democracy, step in and help moron dick. It is puzzling. We see and hear no challenging, beyond a feign to challenge. I try to describe the sickness, the bull crap rot in dick’s head, that makes him/her/it try to use you directed by a sickness of mind that the ignorant cannot and refuse to see. I cannot see the rot in dick’s brain. I see, however, patterns and actions, including the action of constant lying and manipulating. Words do matter.

The bolsheviks, the progressives have the worst pain, suffering, and genocide in mind, for six billion people, including you, yourself. Another something you cannot believe? Read the United Nations’ mission statement when they openly boast their goal is to reduce the world’s population to less than 500 million. Agenda 2030!

I saw what U.N. forces did, to augment the slaughter, in Bosnia. What option do you want?

RESPONSE TO CRAIGSLIST POST, OCTOBER 5TH, Boise Idaho, Re: “No Hope For America/It’s Too Late”

Re: “No Hope For America/It’s Too Late”

The post being critiqued was found on Craigslist, Boise POLITICS on October 4th, 2020, but originally it was a response intended for Craigslist only. Craigslist has shut me down while lying libs have ease posting lies and fabrications. As a rule when I intend only to post on CL, I do not save the original post. Occasionally it is reposted and I can find it, but for now, I have quoted parts of the original post in my commentary, and that will have to be enough to give a clear idea of the propaganda of the bolshevik left.

What a moron, and here is why.

What is a “New Age Democrat”? Is it just another goofy fabrication by someone trying to make democrats looks smart, progressive?

You see progressive, as in the progressive movement, comes to us from the early 1900s. Progressives are advocates of centralized government: oppression and eliminating technology, such as automobiles, your plastic phones, clothing, utensils and tools. They are trying to return We, the People to a medieval feudal system while their democracy grabs more and more power and luxuries for themselves. Remember, it is their democracy and we don’t get any. That is just what democracy is, direct involvement for those directly affected and thus, direct gains excluding all outside the group.

New Age Democrats. That’s a laugh. What a maroon.

Dick claims, “…Republicans believe they are on the road to success with a strong army of supporters and all the Hope, Help, and Love of God behind them.”

Then dick writes, “They couldn’t be further from the truth.”

So, who cares. Polling is always wishful thinking for dem/libs, hoping to discourage republic-committed and conservative citizens from voting.

Dick never really explains that thought, therefore it is simple speculation, from a biased buffoon.

What is “transfermation”? Does bolshevik dick, Caldwell cuckold to the big agent provocateur stars, mean transformation? Could not be a typo, but studying dick’s syntax etc., looks like dick is a sub-intelligent puppet. When tyranny gains hold it kills the puppets first. Farewell caldwell dick.

I do wonder, however, what and who dick is talking about. Does caldwell dick make it clear? 

When dick refers to “…ridiculously rich Republicans…”, does he mean Tom Steyer, Zuckerberg, Zucker, Bezos as rich republicans? D’oh, those “people” are democrat, deep state fascists, working with democrat party government and deep state democratic entities: truly, fascist by definition. Maybe he/she/it is referring to Soros, injecting hundreds of millions into democrat politicians’ campaigns? Can dick give us a name, or stop lying!

What corporate devils is dick talking about, Google, Facebook, New York State, Apple, Amazon, California State? These are all democrat party contributors and affiliates. Yes, let caldwell bolshevik and his/her/its marxist buddies destroy sources of groceries, tires and gas, Walmart. Let the dicks destroy your phone source, Mac computer business; destroy almost everything in your life, because he/she/it has a hatred for things he/she/it cannot control to control you. Ah, that is the real issue: you. He/she/it and the democrats must surely hate you evidenced by their never-ending stream of lies to you. Do your friends lie to you?

Can dick enter this debate? I jest. Dick, as we can all see, does not want to debate. That was a trick to get you to think dick is real, not a Chinese spy and not sincere. A pretense to want to debate is a bolshevik tactic to deflect from real debate while creating fake credibility, to deceive YOU. Do you believe dick’s claims? Do you believe dick’s claims without checking? It works.

Can dick tell us why he/she/it puts “ democrat minds” in with Corporate devils and rich republicans? No. How does dick expect to have any credibility for any of his/her/its claims? He doesn’t? No, nobody could be that stupid. Manipulative maybe, using emotionally charged words to manipulate someone, the ones to whom dick opines and lies; the ones who believe without verification. YOU?

It is so stupid it is almost funny. I find it laughable because I end up enjoying the ass-kicking I give the lying bolshevik bastard.

This next one will be funny.

Dick claims, “The corporate devil’s, democratic minds, and ridiculously rich Republicans have teamed up together to transform the world for the better of mankind…ok, themselves; but many of you on both sides are the ones who wanted this!”

Who wanted what? Many of us on both sides wanted sarcasm, transformation?

Who continually spoke of “fundamentally transforming America”? Was it Obama or Bugs Bunny? What politics party today continually speaks of transforming America, transforming the American Electoral College, and making cities sanctuary cities? Are you, dear reader, so silly you will blame Bugs Bunny, Daffy Duck, and nondescript rich republicans and corporations?

What the hell is dick talking about, except doom and gloom, and from what?

Dick continues, “When you voted to decriminalized drugs and legalized Marijuana they gave you what you wanted and while you where all high as fu(__), they put a plan together and your here to witness it folks!! That is if you can stay sober long enough anyway…”

Wow, this paragraph is so bad, one must think dick is a grade-school dropout. Are you sure you want morons like dick teaching you anything?

Who voted to decriminalize drugs? Who voted to legalize Marijuana? This movement is almost exclusively a function of democrats trying to dehumanize We, the People; trying to turn We, the People into less effective, unthinking animals. Animals are easier to control, and use. Any disagreement regarding who it is easier to put a leash on, animals, conservatives or dumbed down democrats who believe without verification?

Should the correct word be were for where? Is it ‘my here’, as in dick’s terrible vocabulary claim “your here”? Should it be you’re here?

Again, do you actually think this cause-and-effect retard can offer you anything logical, honest, sane or good for you in any way?

Why are all democrats pushing these things? Are they all whacky as caldwell bolshevik-dick?

Yes, they are as dumb. Don’t you get it yet? Some are better actors and actresses than the masses of unintelligible democrat voters. How intelligible are illiterate Mexican invaders? The dregs of Mexico, not the brains and professionals, invaded us.

This sub-intelligence is an endemic part of the democrat party and liberal ideology. Cause-and-effect retardation, or the organized dumbing down of America is most apparent and sufferable in the democrat party. The ideologically superior “leaders” of the democrat party require dumbed down, emotionally-manipulated animals to judge, profit, and ravage.

Who is not staying sober? What kind of mindless presumption attacks a potential reading audience by making such stupid presumptions of the potential readers. What a moron! Must be incline retard from way back: maybe Moo-stank. Maybe the whack-job is utardia, agent provocateur who tried to recruit me, and disappeared long ago because I kicked its worthless ass every day.

What an idiot; a droning, mindless, animalistic, unintellectual idiot.

Have you, dear reader, found anything useful and understandable in anything dick provided today? Did dick provide a single example for any pot his/her/its claims? Did dick provide a name, a reference, a document? Did dick go back to the founding of America where we can find fundamental principles the originators of our self-governing constitutional republic can be explained and discovered or, did dick rely on the ignorant resistance of puppet lap-dogs who believe everything the hand that feeds them claims?

How many times do I have to ask? Will someone please respond to my points, or give dick some support? Will someone please come to the moron’s defense and clarify his/her/its points, or maybe actually make them for putzy?

The following is the only sane and logical thing dick has said in years. Even though it is grammatically incorrect, and if read as it is written, dick presents two incomplete sentences that, if stood separate from each other, would be idiotic, and incomprehensible.

Just read the sentence, “When you legalize drugs!”

The sentence is a subordinate sentence requiring another sentence related to the conjunction “when”.

It means nothing because nothing is said.

This is typical of all dem/lib progressive/marxist drivel. Nothing said except a bunch of emotional fluff. Are you sure you want incomplete nincompoops making decisions for you? How about you make decisions, tell your representative, and he or she meets with others to bring all the ideas together? Is that a good plan? We call it a representative, Constitutional Republic. Dippy’s plan isn’t even bad democracy.

My gawd, how stupid can dem/libs get?

The last bit of propaganda, mentally-incapacitated propaganda is sheer stupidity.

Dick proposes we will be getting products from Amazon alone, that somehow, magically, corporations will disappear, except for a massive democrat supported institution monopolizing our lives. What will happen to Walmart, dick?

I have books’ worth of critique for the last jumble of thoughts, but just cannot do it.

One thought, however: do zombies exist, as dick opined, and do they eat food? I thought zombies ate brains. Can you buy food grade brains from amazon?

Okay, another thought. Isn’t monopoly, where a government eliminates competition for one business, and then teams up and controls that business, allowing the business to flourish and create a handful of wealthy owners and managers: isn’t that the definition of fascism?

Does dick know what he/she/it is talking about?

Holy cow. How dumb can dem/libs, agents of the democrat party comintern, get?

CRAIGSLIST POST SEPTEMBER 29TH, 2020

The definition of Antifa is Anti-Facist and anti right wing extremism (anti white supremacist).

Fascism (/ˈfæʃɪzəm/) is a form of far-right, authoritarian ultranationalism characterized by dictatorial power, forcible suppression of opposition and strong regimentation of society and of the economy which came to prominence in early 20th-century Europe.

Italy (1922–1943) Main article: Italian Fascism. …

Germany (1933–1945) Main article: Nazism. …

Japan (1931–1945) Main article: Statism in Shōwa Japan. …

Austria (1933–1945) Main article: Austro-fascism. …

Belgium (1930s–1945) Main article:

Definition of ANTI is opposed to or the opposite of. So to people who think Antifa is bad. Please read above.

So fascism is bad and Antifa is good. Get it? Please say you do.

Thank you

DO NOT BE SURPRISED IF PRESIDENT TRUMP DOES NOT WIN THE PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION, PART ONE

Do not be surprised if President Trump does not win the election. The democrats have gone to many extremes to discredit opposition and garner attention, failing to give a single reason why their non-existent ideals should be considered planning.

Democrat campaigning has been cruel, deceptive and disconnected. With every radical statement, empty promise, attack, fabrication of social issues and evasion of real issues, democrat politicians are not only losing support and votes from democrats, they do not seem to care or worry.

The lies and attacks from every democrat politician worries me less than their apparent lack of concern for alienating and losing voters. If they are not worried, why?

The liberal media openly reports this and does it with airs of moral superiority, as if the outcome will prove they are right and in ethically superior. Why the bravado?

It is like the media reports on a football team traveling to the big game together, in a bus but the team does not have the star quarterback. The media, in this anecdote, is totally focused on the bus, the team in the bus, and the attitude and boasting of the team and support. The media goes to great lengths reporting it as if the apparent disadvantages do not matter, and that the necessities will not impact the unquestionable win by the incomplete team.

The democrats are not only missing their quarterback in Joe Biden, who lapses in and out of lucidity, reality and thought, but they are missing equipment and other constants.

How could any team get on a bus without shoulder pads, helmets, and the starting quarterback? How could any team show confidence in themselves when lacking so much? How does a team even begin a single play without a quarterback? It is impossible to think this team, so lacking in parts and mechanisms, could effectuate a single play, yet somehow, mysteriously and hidden to all by the media, the team has confidence and claims win. What variable in the equation is withheld from the public in the case of the football team, and the democrat party apparent incapacities?

In both cases, the real and anecdote, the cajoling, talking and interacting with confidence is exerted because they know the quarterback is already at the arena and the full team staff and equipment is also waiting for them. 

The anecdote is apparent, real equipment, a defined position in a quarterback, and support while the democrat party reality is that the public does see Biden’s numerous incapacities.

In the case of the democrat party recessive functionality, in their minds and boisterous proclamations, they have already won. What variables are waiting for the democrats that makes them, like the football team, seem to be so full of confidence in spite of so much insufficiency?

You, dear democrat party supporter, might read my commentary and think I am delusional, that the democrat politicians are not lacking or openly supported by a biased media helping them cover up. If I am lying, please, read on and give yourself justification and proof. If I am not lying, you had better know because truth, maybe providing rational opinion only, just might give you enough information to know you are being deceived to be used. Either I am your best friend at this moment, giving you information to make a rational decision, or I am using you for some mysterious reason, as I claim the progressive/bolsheviks behind the media focus, are your enemies.your best friend and tying to save you. Read on, for your own sake.

What do democrats have that we do not see? That question is only significant when I have convinced you they have abandoned many political tactics and traditions while employing tactics that have proved to produce failure. They are on the bus without a quarterback and equipment. Does that not raise questions in your mind?

The democrats are on their way to the big game without a complete staff and lacking full complement of equipment.

It is illogical that the other “team” thinks it will not be an easy win. One simple, irrefutable variable is that Biden is senile and incapable of sustained energy for anything. He does not have a snowball’s chance in hell of surviving one year, let alone four, as president. Do you not think this systemic democrat party deception will not go unrewarded with the alienation of at least some, if only a small percentage of democrat voters?

Surprisingly, the unprepared “team” is confident, even boosting and drawing attention to their own incapacities: lack of plans and non-existent logistics implementation.

All this distraction occurs with the help of the media. What does the team have that is being hidden by the distractions of the media chasing the bus and providing a flowing focus on the non-essentials, emotions and action itself?

Surely there are democrat voters who have looked into Biden’s collusion with Ukrainian companies and the Chinese government, and have abandoned the democrat party. You, dear reader, may not believe that but would prefer to remain your own worst enemy, lying to yourself, unit you look into opposing views and find the oppositional views have accurate sources. 

Is it possible some democrats have abandoned the party due to violence and rioting in democrat-controlled cities and states? Have you not seen the connection or do you think some of your American neighbors and fellow citizens can be sacrificed for something? What would be the gain? If violence grows will it not come to you?

Why is there no social interest news regarding democrat voters of continuing, or waning, support of the party in cities hit by rioting? Why is there no coverage of how supportive and loyal democrat voters are in Portland, Seattle, San Francisco, New York and Minneapolis? Why is there never really any truthful reporting of democrat support?

How many thousands of times have we heard the latino vote goes to democrats? How many times have we seen proof, a news report or picture showing latinos voting in numbers? If it were true would the media not want to propagate the news that latinos are loyal democrats? Who says it is true without an attempt to show the veracity of the claim?

The liberal, democrat media never parades before the public any video of massive latino turnouts at voting precincts. We are never shown buses of latinos or blacks showing up to vote democrat. Non-existent means non-existent votes. The support for the democrat party is a fallacy.

I have estimated that, at best, 27 percent is the real popular vote for the democrat party, but they are loud and thus appear more numerous than hidden numbers and non-existent footage proves. The democrat party is the new bolshevik party: bolshevik meaning, in Russian, minority.

Actually, bolshevik was the bravado of marxists claiming, like media chasing the bus, that the marxist minority was the majority. The bolsheviks of 1917, lost the election, and still gained control of government, beginning a 70 year reign of terror that saw an estimated 30 million Russians murdered by “loving”, “caring”, “serving”, marxist leaders.

The democrats exert the same boisterous, boasting, bravado today, having less support than they would have We, the People, the foolish talk show hosts, and the cowardly republican representatives believe.

Think about this democrat sophistry for a moment. Why are dem/libs so boisterous and assertive regarding support? Why so loud in proclaiming presumption and support?

We are subjected to never-ending polling to predict results dem/libs want. There is democracy involved in actually promoting another “side”. Democrats are void of democracy.

We are bombarded with near absolute deceptive polling, all politically biased to one side. It is all fraught with error. Polling is not much different than modeling, the perfect fabrication for all the wishes and fantasies dem/libs live and propagate.

The polls, after all, did predict a massive win for Hillary resulting in a revelation that the democrat party polls were, still are, grossly inept and full of failure to report. The excuse was that republicans got a better turnout to win, while also claiming Hillary won the popular vote.

The fact is the democrats failed to learn. The liberal media, democrat party invested, reported such fraud it swept them into their own delusion, and they failed to adjust the fabrication of votes enough to win.

There was a degree of adaptation in the 2018 election. Democrats improved their post loss flip-flop to steal six seats from Republican wins in California. See my commentary.

Dem/lib polling consists of loud and bold statements but polling by a biased group can only be biased, and that is the premeditated deception. Who claims polls are correct and accurate, those who report constant and near absolute perfection of one “side”? Is that not suspicious?

In the words of Abraham Lincoln, greatness is not boasted or self-proclaimed, and yet, that is all the democrats have: focus on the claims and fantastical intents without the capacities, people or tools to effect anything. Greatness, or accuracy in reporting, is reported by others. So the democrats and their liberal media boast of their own greatness, and that, in and of itself, is suspicious, if not representative of weakness of character.

How many times have we heard or seen a liberal media person acknowledge good research or ethical reporting of a journalist on the other “side”, never? Never is impossible and yet it is rampant with those who boast and shout loudest, make the most bombastic claims, focus on the immaterial and silence the goodness that the other “side” may execute or, even failing, stumble upon.

In reporting, accuracy and honesty, according to dem/libs, exists from one “side”, theirs. Liars lie, boasting and proactively presenting information because they know they have no truth to back their claims. Will some democrat party supporters abandon simply due to offensive, inaccurate reporting, knowing the real one-sided attacks represent deception and dishonesty? Yes.

There are small cross sections of democrat party supporting Americans who have abandoned and will abandon democrat party support. Some will leave because Joe is senile and Kamala is terribly unlikeable. Some leave because they see deception and contradiction from one sentence o the next. The disingenuity is apparent and many ex-democrat party supporters have expressed derision and switch.

Sometimes we hear of ex-republicans switching as well. But most, if not all, are agent provocateurs, feigning sincerity and objectivity. What exposes the fraud is that they can never admit a reason for remaining with the republican “side”. They literally cannot find a good thing that kept them in conservative association, except for sophist, emotional fabrications. No talk of weighing one set of principles against the democrat/bolshevik list of dogmatic pretenses. Never is a word heard regretting abandonment of Constitutional Republic or Bill of Rights guarantees. The real issues they must avoid because honestly brings attention to long-standing democrat/liberal lies, such as America established as a republic and the founding fathers soundly rejecting democracy for the fraud it is.

One can immediately tell a fake republican who calls radio talk shows. Not a single negative comment about the democrats but the republican side, they claim to abandon is everything evil. They try, but the fraud is irrefutable.

. It is almost funny listening to pretend ex-republicans attack their pretend former party affiliations. They are like children with cookie crumbs on the faces, telling the adults they did not sneak cookies from the jar. Such childish disconnections and dissonance makes them embarrassingly obvious.

Generally speaking, dem/libs have unbridled hatred, that cannot be hidden, and there is almost nothing decent about the real character of republican constitutional self-governance they can mention in a positive manner. They know nothing of it and care not to know, seeking self-aggrandizement and gain at the expense of whomever they can bully, extort and exploit.

My favorite example of democrat, liberal and progressive deception is the uncontrollable urge these frauds cannot control, of claiming they have some regret leaving but cannot mention a single positive thing they regret losing. To these frauds there is nothing they understand as true representative government and freedom, and thus they cannot even fake lying about their regrets.

Some will abandon democrat party support because Joe is corrupt and a child molester (search the videos). Some will leave because of Fusion GPS/Steele Dossier, corruption in FISA courts. Some will leave because they have seen that Pelosi and Schumer are so full of hatred and deception, and AOC and the mob is so hell bent on communist control, they fear the bolshevik originating suppressed anger will easily burst into violence: violence evidenced by democrat politicians’ and liberals’ words.

I am sure I could make this list so much longer if I were to go back to my notes, commentaries, news and reports. Could fractions of a percentage for so many reasons to abandon add up to major loss? Yes. Do democrat politicians and progressives know this? Yes. Do they appear to think about or concern themselves with it? Why not?

Is the bolshevik democrat party really the majority? Does the boasting, bravado and aggressive posturing represent the power of a majority of support? 

Do the weak attempts to bolster themselves and their position expose the weaknesses of a minority of support amongst We, the People. That is my contention.

Does the loud, abrasive, incessant attacking of republicans truly expose the lack of confidence of a large voter support? Does the boasting bravado and childish attacking expose the democrats as the minority? Surely their polls tell themselves more than we know.

The democrats give us the evidence themselves, attacking and lying about everything. You may be a democrat supporter and believe nothing I have written, or, if you are still reading, something may have caught your attention. Will you be your own friend or foe and find the truth?

YAHOO”NEWS” REPORTED, NOVEMBER 6TH, 2016, If This Poll is Right Trump Can’t Win Florida – – or the Election”

Yahoonews reported, November 6, 2016, “If This Poll Is Right Trump Can’t Win Florida – – or the Election”.

With every headline and article I read, written by democrat party apologists or agents, or liberal media personnel, I am sometimes discouraged by the headline if not the actual news. I am clearly an anti-establishment supporter: the clintons being the most establishment entity in government today.

But I know, without exception now, that I always find discrepancies, contradictions and inconsistencies, if not outright lies and whacky fabrications, in every article or “NEWS” item published by any dem/lib.

Garver’s article, if I were to accept that he is relating some truth or fact, could be quite deflating. But he is simply regurgitating models and predictions, not actual polling.

Patience, my fellow American readers, I will make my case.

Furthermore, I dare not read an article from any source without some preponderance as to the truths I will find, naturally hoping to find parties I believe to be dishonest: have maybe, somehow, decided to be honest. Am I actually looking for truth? Yes. Do I find it in liberal media? You, dear readers, will have to read on and decide what is truth and what is not. To preface that I ask you, do you want to know the truth?

If I thought that voting for an avowed socialist, Bernie Sanders, for example, would be in the best interests of America and Americans, I would have been a staunch supporter. The impediment to that is that I know the history and proper application of the terms left-wing, right-wing, and volumes of related information. I understand tyranny and how it germinates and burgeons. I have studied the founding fathers’ efforts to keep America free of tyranny (by any name), and can see through the fraud of socialism. I have studied the writings and arguments for different parts of OUR Constitutional Republic, as presented to knowledgable Americans, in the days of breaking free of Britain.

I have studied the sources for the founding fathers’ insights, the ancient Greek city states. I have come to different conclusions from my contemporaries in a few areas, and theorized about many things. I have written articles for my arguments. Some of my commentaries can be found at earnwrite.com, author brent.

One of my claims and commentaries is that socialism is not a political system. It actually has characteristics of politics but nothing of the representative process. These things are different, you ask. Read on.

Socialism is a system of lying, cheating and plunder. It is an economic system subjected to and pushed by centralized political force: which is not representative power. Socialism does not remedy inequality of income and wealth. When one group is robbed to give to another there is always a cost, an inequality. There is no production from the middle man, people in government. 

Even middle men in business produce something. Middle-men typically provide a service of either delivering or marketing. What service do socialist politicians deliver, stealing from one to give to another? Who is served, besides the politician?

Socialism starts with a big lie, that government can produce something: equality.  Equality cannot be produced nor can it be achieved except when all are reduced to common denominators, poverty and ignorance.

Equality can never be achieved because some do more with the same amount of rsources. Both denominator and numerator must be controlled for equality, and it cannot be forced upon people to do less when brains expand ideas differently.

Struggling for existence in ignorance makes all men equal. Even that extremely low denominator does not make equality. Adaptability is the key to survival and growth. Socialism, the political process of centralizing power, wealth and initiative in the hands of a few self-appointed superiors, must destroy adaptability: initiative and capital. Capital comes in many forms and the socialists, the marxist democrats and bolshevik progressives know this. Capital is initiative, or labor and investment. Investment can be money or goods.

Being forced to compress and remain totally stifled upon ruler command, is close to equality. It is the total incapacity to survive, and that is what centralized dementocrat tyranny wants. The agents boast of equality, but refuse to explain the variables that must be destroyed: variables that cannot be wiped from the nature of man, any man or woman. To enforce socialism, marxism, utopia is the impossible dream, to eradicate mankind from man. Transforming people into beasts of burden is the only way. Ignorance, fear and instinctual responses such as sexualizing everything is how people turn their neighbors into beasts of burden. Who does that today?

It is the ignorance variable that makes all equal. A ruler that promises equality knows the task of forcing ignorance to the depth of animalism, is the continuing challenge and role he or she must take.

The lies and fraud that follow the big lie are designed to hide that first big lie, and move people along to accept tyranny and plunder, by many names that seem innocent. There is no innocence in taking from others by law. Frederick Bastiat referred to this as legal plunder.

Do we read to acquire information? Do we not all listen to the NEWS for information? Do we hear NEWS because we want to be deceived? This seemingly innocent statement should be qualified. It has been said we trust those most who lie to us best.

The headline, “If This Poll Is Right Trump Can’t Win Florida – – or the Election”, surely sparks some kind of emotion from anyone that reads it: for some elation, for others disappointment and even anger. This article, and articles like it, always inspire me to find the stink-bombs of fraud and deception.

Part of tyranny’s fraud and deception is manipulation. Surely, if you are a democrat supporter or a liberal, you are already discounting my words, even though I have barely stated anything against your beliefs or the democrat political machine, or in criticism of liberals manipulating behind the scenes.

I am certain I have stated something you will be able to use to excuse your information gathering quest. But if you miss the point, you miss much more than you can afford. If you refuse to read anything you miss out. If you want the gold you have to get right in the muck and mud, and dig. Neither gold nor truth jump at you and proclaim, ‘here I am’. Fool’s gold will do that and there is a reason fools seek fool’s gold in NEWS and truth.

Some dig for information to arm themselves for further deception. Some like to arm themselves with misinformation because they are afraid of truth. How can one be afraid of something he or she knows not? It is the darkness of dark, the darkness of ignorance, and the light of reality that give us cause to fear.

I hate green beans although I have never tasted them. How do I know I hate them? Is it because I have other information that tells me what I imagine they will taste like? From where did I get this other information, and is it correct? Can I be wrong? How could I possibly be right when green beans have a unique flavor, like all foods?

How can I, or anyone, be right in presumption without reading? How can I be right that I will not like what I fear to read because of the title? Is the title correct? Is the initial presentation of information correct or true? How could I or anyone know if I do not read the article, dissect it and compare the knowledge received with the claim(s) of the title?

The question to you, then, is, ‘what dreadful result of reading “opposing views” for information and truth do you imagine in your mind?’

What fear do I imagine when I read the title, “If This Poll Is Right Trump Can’t Win Florida – – or the Election”?

Am I afraid it is true?

As sentient beings we get overwhelmed with what we imagine we cannot sort through and understand. As a result of this seemingly overwhelming task, some people stick to the simple truths, or familiar biases that are not always true. The titles of so much of what we read or hear seem true but can truth actually be found in titles?

For example I can claim ‘math is easy’. Do you, dear mathematics student, now know math?

Trump will win. Do you now know it? 

Those who manipulate you want you to believe the simple titles because there is no substance to claims they make, and thus their work, if it can be called that, is done: or so they presume.

Those who profess and proclaim by titles and clichés, experience no embarrassment or ridicule. They become demagogues of superficial titles and headlines. They become their own sources of truth, by lies and fraud, all to hide the lack of substance. For example: explain to us the characteristics of democracy and how it applies to our representative system in America.

Have you, dear reader, ever heard a democrat or liberal explain it? To explain it would reveal the deception and fraud.

When the news reports a one or two sentence claim, it is a title, nothing more. The truth of any news is not found in the title, or the title-like news casts that give us one-line clichés and manipulative emotional blasting. The truth is found digging below the apparent NEWS, all of it, and getting in the muck and mud of substance.

The title, “If This Poll Is Right Trump Can’t Win Florida – – or the Election”, caused an emotional response for myself, as it was designed.

However, I have learned to not panic, and I did not. But, does it relate truth and reality? Can the author explain how Trump cannot win? Those who talk in circles of things others do not understand, and do not take time to explain the process, advantages and disadvantages, do not want intelligent followers.

Can I state a title with respect to the author of “If This Poll is Right Trump Cant Win Florida – – or the Election”? Here is my headline: Garver does not want anyone to think for themselves.

Can I explain that, or will you simply believe it? Why would you believe a title of one who tries to not explain by dwelling in the ethereal arena of misrepresented headlines?

Ah, but you do not know until you read and find the substance.

So the question comes to us, before reading any title or hearing any “title-like” news report or news cliché: what do you hope to gain by reading any news or any title? Will you investigate further or be manipulated by clichés and potentially false terms and/or words in titles? 

Another example: Read the headlines of political news reports. Titles and “reports” often have the words democracy and America in the same sentence. If you do not notice democracy and America in the same sentence or title, then search for one example of Constitutional Republic in a sentence with America. Do we assume, as a result, that America is a democracy? Some do. I never did believe it. I looked for myself. You can too, or just believe what you want. 

The initial statement of Garver’s article tries to set a presumption in the reader’s mind, if the reader has not heard opposing views or if the reader decides to accept the title because of the source, that a “poll” is a “poll” because a reporter reported it. Is that true?

Polls today, the day before the election and for the past two years have reported nothing but favorable wins and conditions for democrats.

And we can find opposing information, that will smother a few polls and any researcher woking for “truth”.

Does public education have opposing views? Is this where children learn? Garver’s is an article I would want to read for the NEWS value of it but I admit, my mind is tainted, biased, suspicious because of the absolute deception and fraud I have experienced, refuted and correct, by dem/libs and apologist liberal media. Even that, I acknowledge is a bias. But even a biased report can be dissected and truth extracted from it.

In Garver’s article I quickly found contradictions and poor reporting, as I knew I would,

But you, dear reader, may have your own bias that everything you receive from democrat/liberal sources is truthful, or you might find that it is not democrat or liberal sponsored and supportive.

You may believe polls are objective and accept that polls reveal truth, reporting just what is found in unbiased polling and questioning. At a glance, in any article, I can now find the duplicity of all democrat and liberal writers. I do not include “all” lightly.”

Now you, dear investigator, can journey with me through Garver’s  article and find truths and lies, if there be any. Will a truth cause you some emotional pain? Yes, but I can tell you that finding the truth and accepting one truth, and that one truth on its own merits, for what it really is, liberates the soul. Every step, every truth one finds is another nail pushed out of your coffin of slavery: ignorance.

Ignorance is slavery, for the ignorant, because there are those who use ignorance to manipulate others. Are you, dear fellow American, a fool, trusting others’ words without question or curiosity? How did that human trait become washed from your soul?

So, what is a poll? Do you, dear fellow American, understand every aspect and word of that “title”?

No. So few do. The ones who understand are the ones manipulating the results.

A poll is not 100 percent polling.

Like global warming, there are so few professionals involved, it would cause amazement, wonder and confusion, at how these so-called experts arrive at their conclusions and predictions, and fool us all.

Global warming has zero scientists, although democrats and liberals refer to the “global warming community”, as if it existed.

Find a scientist in the global warming community that has actually done a scientific experiment or taken measurements. There is nobody. How can one be a scientist if one does nothing scientific? How can one be a baseball player if one does nothing “baseball”?

Dig, for yourselves, and find the truth.

There are so few pollsters, the number is insignificant.

How many people, experts would we suspect are part of a “think tank”? What is a think tank?

A think tank is a handful of readers and writers that fabricate “information”, from an extremely limited amount of input, while they pretend to create scenarios from their superior intellect.

To sound intelligent and expert, they “spin”: a reference to spinning yarns, stories. “Pollsters” are think tanksters, they spin “intelligence” from an extremely limited number of people actually polled. Mostly what they do, is twist and fabricate stories that will be accepted after the fact of something sinister and hidden. Has any dem/lib mentioned that polling is mostly computer-generated predictions and models based on old data? Who does not want you to know that?

Like the global warming community, that uses models and computer-generated predictions, based on political remedies for apolitical fabrications, the think-tanksters/pollsters do the same.

Most of the “polling” is taken from biased models and think tanksters that are trying to create credibility for the inevitable incredulity.

The think tanksters/pollsters insert words, change meanings of words, and add contradictory words that shake one’s thoughts, and give the impression that the writers and “think tanksters” are intelligent. This a very few other tactics tricks millions every time.

Polling is a series of models: numbers and think-tanksters , fabricated interpretations. It could be biased but nobody would know until he or she studied polling, rhetoric (grammar) and looked at the questions think-tanksters ask. Have you done that?

Polling is like non-scientific, non-existent scientists in the non-existant global warming community. It is all done by models chasing political compliance for a fabricated fear.

A democrat party poll, is a biased fabrication of democrat/liberal opposition always making the opposing views lose. Look up a term, dialectic advancement, and you will know why democrats appear to lose, some time.

The polls are rigged and the ballot counting is rigged.

Is that a simple, manipulative title? Sure, until you check it out.

I spend more time reading opposing “NEWS” than conservative or republican/republic NEWS. What trashing can I do to truth? What critique do I have with truth without fabrication and deception? None, so I cannot “bash” conservative, historically-correct truth.

For example, America was founded as a democracy. NO. False.

America was founded as a Constitutional Republic. Oh, is that true? Is it important to know? Why would it be important to know?

Are the characteristics of democracy and Constitutional Republic different, and is one better than the other? What would make one better than the other? If we qualify the question with, ‘for who is either system better, and how’, we might be getting closer to some reality.

Who would, in the first place, not want Americans to know the truth of whether America was founded as a democracy or a Constitutional Republic? Who mentions “democracy” continually in their titles? Do constitutional supporters mention democracy in their titles? Do conservatives mention democracy in the same sentences as America? No. The two simply do not go together and do not belong in the same sentence or concept together. Why?

What truth or truths are you failing to learn and know by not being told America was founded as a Constitutional Republic?

What truth or truths do you not learn or know as a result of believing the title, “If This Poll Is Right Trump Can’t Win Florida – – or the Election”?

Before we begin to know that, we must dissect the title. You, however, must determine if you will accept truth when you find it. If you will not then you must realize you are rejecting truth: fact that will benefit yourself, and those around you. That is quite a responsibility.

It is important to know that once you have internalized truth it is not difficult to maintain. Once you know a truth you do not have to relearn it. Compared to lying, and trying to make connections of lies that surely must follow, truth is liberating. Furthermore a truth learned releases other truths from the bondage of fear.

In this case, I boldly state, elections are rigged always in favor of the democrat party. Mistakes would be made in favor of all parties involved, but that is not the case for the innumerable mistakes made in the 2016 election, and prior elections.

The youtube videos abound in the thousands. Secret interviews, explanations, redefining terms and words as their original intents and meanings, and innumerable sites and expose´s can be found and you will learn

I cannot even begin to list them.

But know this, Garver makes no references to anything that will educate you, my dear fellow citizen.

Please. Dear fellow American, do an internet search for black box vote. Check out Hillary meltdown. Anne Coulter has some great interviews and makes super points. Look up voter fraud, Petition Project.

How about Huma Abedin connections to Islam? Check out Fast and Furious gun running, Benghazi interviews, Trey Gowdy, Jason Chaffetz.

Look in the NEWS and find something, and research it until you have the truth. You will know truth. When you find a series of statements and apparent truths, and they connect easily, you have truth.

For example, We have a Bill of Rights. WE live in a Constitutional Republic system of self governance. Are the two connected and can they stand on their own?

Why do We, Americans, have a Bill of Rights? Do all democracies have a Bill of Rights? Would it surprise you to know that there is no such thing as a Bill of Rights anywhere in the world except in America? A Bill of Rights, is unique to OUR Constitutional Republic. Is someone trying to turn your, OUR Constitutional Republic into a democracy, with no individual rights? Who would do such a dastardly thing? Which rights will you, my fellow citizen, voluntarily surrender, Freedom of Speech, Freedom of Religion, Freedom of self-determination, Freedom of commerce, ownership, presumption of innocence?

Find the truths you want. Do it now before you vote for tyranny. You had better ask, and you had better want to know, ‘which party is tyranny’? You had better know because if you make a mistake the losses you wish on others, history shows irrefutably, will either enslave or kill YOU! Search for and boldly face whatever fear this “title” has caused you, and be free.