Bill Maher, moments of cognizance.
Surely he will argue that point. Call it my opinion. I have heard Bill Maher lie and lie.
However, today I write, report, that Bill Maher, a proponent of the left-wing bolshevik rhetoric, not necessarily true, made some keen observations one would not expect from dem/lib movements, particularly, the dumbing down of Americans through a dissembled, subjugated de-education system.
Bill Maher referred to and played a ticktock video clip of questions asked of Americans. “What is the biggest city in the world?”, is one such question.
The answers were, Asia, Europe, Brazil, and others, maybe some actually citing a city.
Maher’s words following are an expose that even the bolshevik-left realizes their dismantling and destruction of real education is a reality.
Maher states: “…so you tell me, if a country is only as strong as its people what can the future possibly hold for a population this moronic, being a full grown adult and thinking a human could walk on the sun? Or that the biggest city in the world as Asia. This country simply has no education standards anymore. They will let you out of a public high school and give you a diploma and you don’t actually have to know anything, which used to be the mission of schools, knowing things.”
Maher was referring to Critical Race Theory, as opposed to actual education of “…knowing things”, and he continued that our children do not know anything.
Controlling ignorant populations is always a construct of left-wing, boshevik/dementocrat tyranny, and Maher has noticed.
I have a number of simple questions, for many issues, that left-wing dementocrat, bolshevik drones constantly refuse to answer, address, or even allow to be discussed. Hence we see ruling, un-representative governing bodies, such as education boards, having parents removed from the lives of their own children.
Why is a theory taught in schools as if it were the ultimate issue, the only theory and irrefutable truth? Why is Critical Race Theory taught, imposed, lived, and forced upon our children when it is only a theory? What opposing, or related theories should have equal representation and time as CRT?
I have been investigating heliocentric (globe) theory versus flat, plane(t) earth for a number of years now. I have been kicked off Facebook numerous times, suspended, for arguing, fighting, delivering the same tone and vocabulary as those with whom I fight, while they are not suspended.
I have a question that seems to draw the ire of all heliocentric model believers: If the earth is a globe, why do photos show a flat horizon at any shore of a large body of water?
To explain this in geometric terms, if one claims he or she can see a curve looking out to sea, as a ship, for example, moving away from shore, appears to roll over the curve of the earth and “sink” why is this same curve not seen looking across that same view, in fact, where the distance is greater?
If we, mankind, has been into space, why are there no photos of earth from space?
You might well argue that there are. Might I point out that there are CGIs, models, composites, drawings, art and much related but not one single photo.
In fact, the dearth of photos of earth from space is starkly accentuated when we consider the latest jaunt into “space” by bozo-bezos an William Shatner.
Do not forget that Shatner is an actor, and acts unreal situations.
In tha fall of 2021, Bozo-bezos and Shatner took a rocket flight into “space”.
Apparently the whole event lasted 11 minutes, and the report is that the, “The rocket launched from Blue Origin’s private facility in West Texas, reaching above 100 kilometers (or more than 340,000 feet altitude) before returning to Earth safely a few minutes later.”
How did it return? Was it in space? Did it actually go into “space”, and turn around and come back?
How does propulsion push against something that isn’t there, the void of “space”, to change direction so it can return?
That is just the beginning of questions regarding a fake flight into “space”, or a flight into fake space.
Two minutes, with all the new technology of today, is all they could manage?
How many seconds of weightlessness did they experience? Weightlessness can be experienced in a jet at any altitude. We call it falling. The same effect can be felt when an elevator drops.
Why no photos?
With all the new technology, advances in rocketry, and apparent photos of earth in 1969, why could these goons not take one photo of earth from space, even with a fish-eye lens? Did they not actually go into “space”?
These are just questions from my immediate thoughts, drawn from recent internet “discussions”, I wonder about these theories. I am certain I will be adding to this list of queries.
Do not forget that the heliocentric model is a theory and at best a model. With perfect lack of photos of earth from “space”, one must remember that the globe earth is a theory and only a theory,
Do not forget that the plane(t) earth as a flat, straight plane is also a theory but not taught or given a 1% effort as the theory of earth as a globe;
Critical race as a theory is given so much time and instruction it is more than a subject in. School. It has actually been instituted as societal fabric: a part of reality that is only theory.
One should be astounded at how recent and oppressive CRT is; how CRT is so recently instituted and augmented, as compared with other theories.: theories that are so ignored they are not even mentioned.
There are in existence theories in opposition to CRTtheory but CR theory has not been questioned in the least. Not even questioned is the reality that CR theory is only theory and opinion.
How about we teach the Bill of Rights and discourses by Thomas Jefferson, Abraham Lincoln, George Washington, all who opined their theories, that proved to be much more than theory? What theories could these possibly be, you ask. Have you read your history? From where does the Bill of Rights originate? What?
The Bill of Rights, you say, is not a theory that challenges CR theory. How would you know if you have not studied, looked, maybe read one page from the public notices that contributed to the Bill of Rights?
Public notices, you ask? The Federalist Papers is a collection of letters written to colonials at the time of the War of Independence, published throughout the colonies. Public discourse, as opposed to demented CR theory hiding from parents’ purview, was popular in those years: very PUBLIC, theorized and discussed at the founding of America.
Read and see for yourselves if the individual rights, described as coming from god, challenge CR theory.
To be fair to all theories, how about the de-eduction system spend a few moments every day teaching possible challenges to CR theory? How about an equal dispensation of time for each theory be allotted asa balanced curriculum? Who wants an imbalanced curriculum?
Would it be possible to return to a class of basic civics and critical ice theory be given a proper place, a theory with as much given it as other theories? Wait, what a basic civics class?
Do you realize students in America were taught basic civics? What happened, where did civics lessons go? The deranged bolshevik dementocrats eliminated civil, and math, and geometry, and biology, and health.
Did you not know this? When the demented education boards teach that 2 plus 2 can equal five, you must realize math is gone.
Please, take note that I purposely identify and accentuate that this CRT is identified by the authors themselves as theory. Being a theory it deserves much much less attention than things such as, why can people not walk on the sun and what are the big cities of the world?