PART 3: “NASA OBSERVATORY RECORDS UNUSUAL ACTIVITY ON THE SUN.”

Now, finally, open the article, read and watch the animation.

The title of the article reads, “the sun just did something weird, and 3 other space stories you may have missed this week”.

The sun did something weird? How does nature that can only act natural, do something weird? How dumb. How is nature weird? How does the sun, totally untouched and unaffected by earth become weird?

What are the pre-test conditions and data, and post-test conditions, from which nasa makes comparisons to state the sun did something different or weird? Pre-test and post test, science, is absolutely missing from this goofy article. How utterly ridiculous can nasa luciferians get?

The subscript reads, “An oddball new exoplanet, small but significant steps toward the future of spaceflight and a mystery in the Kuiper Belt.”

“Oddball”? Wow, that is so scientific it is scary. What a stupid thing to write. How does a thing without feet step? What stupid clichés can only follow stupid “people”,

A “new exoplanet”? A new planet discovered? “Exo”, as in external? There can only be an “exo” if there is an “endo”, or internal. And what determines ”exo” and “endo”? No comparators, no examples, no parameters or definitions, just stupid words and pieces tossed about to confuse and create education chaos. This is bloody, evil deception.

See how the luciferian liars toss in terms and words that mean nothing so they can sound smart and expert, so they can lie with impunity and control you first with fear and then LAW that follows your response to fear they create.

How much farther from earth than the sun, is this theorized planet?

If all nasa can provide is an animated depiction of the moon from earth, while the sun is even more out of the realm of visual possibility, then a new planet, even more distant than that, cannot be seen or discovered.

How utterly science-retarded can nasa get?

If the sun is impossible to see because the moon is impossible to see, then some crazy, theorized, fabricated, imagined new “exoplanet”, farther away, is absolutely impossible, and absolutely impossible to film or photograph.

The subscript reads, “An oddball new exoplanet… in the Kuiper Belt.”

There is no Kuiper belt because there is no measurement or substantiated distance. There is no relationship of these heavenly bodies therefore they do not exist. The distance to the sun is theorized to be 400 times the distance of the moon from earth, but the distance of moon from earth is not calculated so none of what follows, the whole of globe theory and nasa, is not substantiated and does not exist.

Sure, go ahead, build a house on a pretend foundation, and you don’t have a house, an attic, a garage. You don’t have walls, windows, doors and heat. It is impossible to build something on nothing.

Nasa and globe theory is all so much building on nothing. Show us the calculation of the distance of earth to moon. From that, maybe, one could extrapolate information, a measurement or two, to plug into an equation to calculate something from that foundation. Nothing!

I can line up 3 yard sticks, then four yardsticks at a right angle to the three, and then aim five yardsticks from the end of the three yard sticks to the end of the four yard sticks and create a right angle triangle. This is known as a 3, 4, 5 right triangle. It can be used to create a right angle for building something. You can see it. You can watch the creation of it and how it works. You can see the application of it in making a 90 degree angle out of measurements that can only come together in one way.

There is absolutely nothing of the sort, and less in partiality that lends credibility to anything luciferian nasa fabricates. Show us the one point fixed in space, not “space”, from which other variables are derived, measured and used to calculate anything? Nasa still does not have definitive distance of the end of the atmosphere, or beginning of “space” so the distance of earth to moon is impossibly known.

But, don’t believe me. Look at the animation. Look at the words of the article itself, written, fabricated by science-retard, sam matthews.

These yahoo”NEWS” writers are so dishonest and evil, they do not deserve capitalized names, being liars and devils that deserve no human recognition for their crimes against truth, reality, and humanity.

JEFF BOZO BEZOS TRAVELS TO SPACE, FOR A MINUTE

Bozo bezos went into space 7/21/21, no pictures of earth?

Who in his or her right mind would go into space and not take pictures of earth?

What, no windows in “space” craft?

Who would be so stupid to not put a window in a space craft?

The Apollo mission, Apollo 8, took pictures through a window in the craft. Can scientists, engineers and space geniuses not put a window in a launch vessel today?

Everybody knows bozo is a liar. Is this more proof? Did bozo get burned up in the Van Allan Belt? No?

Did NASA forget that the Van Allen Belt is not traversable? How did the astronauts get through in 1969 on their way to the moon? How did the astronauts manage to get to the moon, through the deadly Van Allen Belt, take pictures of the earth through a window, but bozo could not?

Videos abound because NASA forgets.

Here it is, “NASA engineer admits they can’t get past the Van Allen Belt.”

https://duckduckgo.com/?q=van+allen+belt+video&t=h_&iax=videos&ia=videos&iai=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.youtube.com%2Fwatch%3Fv%3D4O5dPsu66Kw

So many bozo can tell us what he was actually doing, and why he had to “go into space” at this particular time, and what he actually did. Why is he misleading the world?

REGARDING CRAIGSLIST POST, “The Demise of our Mother (Dead Lake City Waste-Land)

Re” The Demise of our Mother (Dead Lake City Waste-Land)”, posted June 11th 2021 in Salt Lake City.

I am going to have fun with this one.

I love bashing stupid clichés and regurgitated presumptions.

Can the “writer” show us the life of the earth? Where is the blood, the lungs, the breath, the fire that consumes oxygen to create energy?

We have yet to see a real picture of our “planet”.

All the pictures we see are drawn or computer generated. On youtube (I dare not provide a link) you can find the actual artist who has redrawn the world. How can we believe the earth is a living being when we have not really ever seen it from the heavens?

That may seem to be a bit of a disconnect to many who want to start talking theories etc.

May I remind you all that evolution, Darwin’s Theory of Natural Selection, Einstein’s theory of relativity; all these things are theories. May I remind you that travel through the Van Allan Belts has become a problem but somehow, magically, not knowing about them in 1969, with prehistoric computers, We, America, so-called, managed to pass through these deadly, unknown radiation belts without a problem. NASA has published, on youtube, a number of descriptive explanations of why we do not go to the moon these days, because the Van Allen Belts are lethal. The conundrum, the obvious decades-long contradictions and inherent incongruities can be found for those who simply try to put past moon trips and current incapabilities of space travel beyond earth, together. Again, it is presented that it is impossible to get past the Van Allan Belt.

So many inconsistencies, for those who look for answers and truth, lead you to wonder, how we see the earth accurately.

How do people manage to think the earth is a living breathing thing? Where are the lungs?

So, the point is that a doctor might be presented with a symptom to use for a diagnosis. Is it important to know if the symptom, exposed capillaries, for example, is found in a certain part of the body? Are exposed capillaries in the lungs a problem, or part of natural breathing?

The earth is not a living breathing thing. Living and breathing, to describe earth, is a metaphor so the author’s claims that earth is being abused or dying, is just stupid metaphorically and even dummer realistically.

What makes the earth “mother earth”? Is it another metaphor? YES! No? Where are the genitals to prove one way or another? Metaphoric genitals? Metaphoric female, then!

What constitutes the demise of our metaphoric mother earth? Is it a metaphoric assault, insult, injury? Yes! Someone claims they are superior because they/he/she/it has a concern for a metaphoric demise and the results should be above metaphoric imposition and taxation for others, We, the People, specifically.

The “writer” adds a cartoon caption and picture of a Native American, an Indian, as I know them, stating, for that tribe or person, that, “WE ARE THE ONES WHO SHOULD HAVE BUILT A WALL”

Is “writer” admitting that walls work to save cultures and people? Surely!

Would the natives have built walls to protect themselves from warring tribes? Not smart enough?

“writer” claims readers cannot step out of boxes, more clichés, to make rational observations: rational according to a “writer”/regurgitator spewing metaphors and clichés. Who formed the land and for what reason?

The “writer” attacks mormons. Who says the land was stolen, and from whom, those who were not smart enough to build walls? How is a land identified as belonging when there are no markers, like a wall?

The “writer” has an obvious hatred for mormons, and that hatred goes beyond rationality.

It is not mormons appropriating the land bolshevik-dick, regurgitator of hate-motivated disinformation and dementocrat propaganda, claims.

I find it amazing, too, that dickl adds “fracking” to the fray.

Fracking works. Fracking does not destroy. Fracking has been purposely maligned by dementocrat/bolshevik propaganda. The primary source of hate for fracking comes from a movie, not unlike Al Gore’s silly movie, “An Inconvenient Truth”, in which goofy Al shows a picture of fish swimming in the streets of Florida cities, pretending the waters are rising. Nothing of the such; nothing even close to that fabrication, has happened. Fracking has been shown, in many videos and truthful investigations to do none of the damage the regurgitators claim. Go look for yourselves, or remain ignorant, and shut up!

Who is poisoning the air? Find out and let us know. We have laws already in place restricting emissions. Who is in violation? Nobody, just another democrat bolshevik/progressive bogey man so the dementocrat bolshevik/progressives can oppress the majority with illegal, dishonest impositions and oppression?

We are not their people! Does “writer” understand freedom or is “writer” just another political agent hired to misinform and lead We, the People to accept tyranny’s yoke in ignorance? Again, show us how we belong to “them”.

Dick has the gall to call mormons and the so-called “theirs” <b>“wage slave bitches”</b>. Wow, that is amazingly real, or metaphoric. Such vacillating between reality (as little as there is in dick’s ramblings) and fallacy, is by design. Emotional swings are meant to create mental dysphoria, and fear and hence, submission.

The world is not a living breathing thing that can be killed. Start there and learn. Suppose it could be killed, who actually is killing it? Are natives contributing? YES. Is bolshevik-dick, agent provocateur, regurgitator of bolshevik/progressive propaganda contributing? YES.

When the hypocrites, bolshevik-dicks, their masters and the dementocrat/progressive goons start setting examples, we will follow. When the goons of tyranny give up their vehicles, their heated homes, their plastic phones, clothing and toys; when the goons of tyranny surrender their petroleum based blankets and towels, and watches and shoes, and hats, and homes, we will follow. Until then, their word, lies in reality, are worthless, and 90 percent of everyone knows it.