What do educators do with our children for 12 years less 100 hours to learn to read?
If a child can read a child can learn math, physics, history, everything.
Group think, drone-ism and many other “isms” are taught through group think submersion. Our Children are being classically conditioned to many sub-intelligent, sub-human, self-destructive behaviors.
Everybody is missing the forest for the trees. Everything is group pressure from the top, and created from the top within the group. Favoring one part of the group, the class, by disfavoring another, whites, in particular, is not only divisive, it is chaotic, as planned within the classroom: the group.
In my opinion real learning is not seen.
Two things of unseen, real learning: group, confined, isolated from real world experiences, group-think oppression, is the big teaching success, not reading, not math, not science.
Second: the few minutes at home with instruction by parents, a child directed to learn, is real learning, also not seen.
We are conditioned to see what is not real and vice versa.
In spite of hours of group think instruction in the classroom, children do NOT learn reading, math, science, language. Learning is done by the learner, and more at home out of the group think room.
You do not see it, because your attention is directed at the group-think facility.
You are the major facilitator of the only one who learns, the learner, while the change agent manipulates your child’s mind, principles into dogma and voluntary exploitation.
You are the more successful teacher of the one who learns, the learner, your child.
But, I am telling you group-think is bigger and more detrimental to the individual, your child, than you think.
Communism is not voluntary participation in community. Communism is forced grouping and submission. Schooling in the classroom is submersion in group submission.
Teachers are not teachers. They are placers. They place information before children, in a group-think submission confinement and children learn by participation, submission, and group.
I cannot learn you. Again, teachers are placers. They primarily place group-think submission while learners learn best at home and out of the classroom.
Learning at home is learning. Again the best teacher does not teach. Learning is internal, not external.
The main topic, the main subject, the main and primary focus in institutionalized programming systems is GROUP. It is not noticed because the small parts are the focus of the media. It is taught without question every second of every day a child is subjected to classroom group-think chaos. It is mind-numbing by design, and agents of this assault on children are teachers and administrators.
Group is imposed. “Group” is the lesson being taught. Group control from authority is socialist tyranny, is what children are being programmed to live. They are not taught, they are programmed.
You see, I can use different words to describe what happens to our children. Who is to say I am not correct or more accurate than what you think?
You cannot successfully express your opinion in opposition to mine until you have read and studied. What will you tell me that I have not heard? My opinions developed because I feasted on information from all sides and reject what you have accepted. Let us compare,
I do not care if you are fair to me. You have nothing to convince me of anything anyway. I write this for you. I know your opinions are emotionally motivated, and ignorant because I know you respond immediately to my new information and discussion; my newly formed opinions and interpretations, and you have not had time to investigate. So, your opinions, if you have not done the hundreds, thousands of hours of study as I have done, are nothing to me. Hence, your unfair treatment of my ideas and principles, is nothing to me either. But you should worry for you and yours.
Until you step out of that level of ignorance and learn a few words and analyze both sides of this, your opinion counts for nothing, for you.
Now don’t think I am boasting, or egoist. I am simply stating I have done a lot of research into this over the years and can see through the lies and fake superiority, and I invite you to free yourself, as I did, from the deception of distraction, sophistry, deflection, and self-adoration of fake superiors.
I am making this an issue. I have made this an issue for decades.
Salazar begins to reveal the agenda very quickly in his fairy tale when he states, “She was instrumental in shaping public education policy while serving as a chief of staff and senior policy advisor within the Office of Elementary and Secondary Education at the U.S. Department of Education…”.
Shaping? Shaping can be a number of different things. Taking a blob of clay and forming it into a bowl is shaping. Taking a sledge hammer and bashing the bowl to a mound of rubble is also shaping.
Chaotic division in a classroom group is also shaping.
Salazar said nothing about what she shaped and how, so how do we know she is a good shaper or a shaper of good?
If they deflect, they hide.
When people write or speak in headline statements but give no details, you must wonder about the person’s honesty and the veracity of the claims.
For actual safety reasons you must question this appointee and who actually did it.
I am certain salazar is lying when he claims a stakeholder committee of 40 people “evaluated” her.
How many others were evaluated? Who was on the committee? Tell us their names. Who?
When salazar writes that “…she shapes…”, it means absolutely nothing except that salazar is hiding something from YOU.
I would not trust this grant woman as far as I could kick her lying luciferian ass, or salazar’s.
You might think I am jumping to conclusions, but no. I read the article.
From your perspective, if you have not read the article, you have no place except ignorance in believing I am wrong.
So, it is on you to read and educate yourself. Look for the details. None? Who was on the stakeholder committee, fellow vampires, facilitators of child abuse, parents with children in school?
For all we know the committee was a committee of only dementocrats who believe in big brother government controlling everything in your life, to take everything in your life. Maybe the committee was made up of only biased haters of whites. Who was on the so-called committee? Why the deception?
What is a stakeholder committee? Who did the stakeholders appoint to the committee?
Read the different adjectives and adverbs I use to describe the same things they promulgate, and read my comments of salazar’s and grant’s words, and then go read their words for yourself. You will be reading from my perspective which I claim is, and should be, yours. Then discern for yourself if my interpretation is correct.
If you read the short report with conditioned acceptance, as most people do, you will find it a nice story about her success, with no proof that her so-alled success will benefit your children.
But read the article and ask what and why of everything.
She worked in the department of Education? WOW! And you accept that working for government has inherent credibility? You accept that without thinking or wondering?
That is very bad, for you and yours.
Salazar would have you believe that just being in a place is good. She worked? And that’s it, that’s all?
What work did she do?
It is centralized, de-education that is leaving our children dumb.
Not telling us what makes lizzy grant a good shaper or educator, or programming administrator, or corralling facility manager, makes salazar a liar.
Why is he lying?
Do you like being deceived?
Do your friends and loved ones lie to you?
Of those who lie to you constantly how many of them do you consider to be friend or ally?
Do you not see how grossly deceptive this is, and wonder why?
What the hell about this bolshevik/banker whore, grant are they keeping from you, and why? What plans, programming, institutionalized grouping do they have planned for your children?
Again, why was this bolshevik/banker whore grant hired?
But it gets worse.
What did she do at the U.S. Department of Education? Did she shape, and how. How she shaped, is the issue!
How she shaped and molded and instilled chaos is the issue, not that she worked. What a disgusting fraud laid before you and expected to be accepted without question. Are you really that stupid?
Did she manage? What and how she managed is the issue!
Did she administer, systematize?
She was, however, a “Senior Policy Advisor”. WOW! That clarifies everything.
Is she a senior? Was her policy advising for seniors? How does one become a senior advisor? Somebody sets money aside to pay for such a hypocrisy, for expressing words that deflect and distract. Is that it?
Do you see how liars and fabricators, those who deflect and distract you from truth and reality; do you see how they use title, names, cool words to give themselves adoration and fake credibility?
Again, if she is a good policy advisor, why is she not advising good? And, again, no mention either way.
We do not know if she was a bad policy advisor, but we also don’t know she was good, or an advisor of good policy. Who decides what is bad and what is good, people who don’t care about your children like you do? Who decides what is bad and good for your children, people who care more for titles, capital letters, and money, or you?