I watched a video clip of a young “woman” who recorded herself? She asked, “How am I supposed to support a constitution of a country that treats its women like second class citizens?”
Like the men do. We are all second class citizens.
Furthermore, citizen includes loyalty owed but not necessarily earned.
Furthermore. How would she feel if she decided to get pregnant and have a child but a male, also a second class citizen, decided to do what she claims is her right, kill a child, hers?
Call it what it is and then we can discuss the right to do what is the accurate cause-and-effect so distorted: baby killing.
Abortion is killing. Now, show us where the Constitution states it is a woman’s right to choose life or death of another being. Show us where the Constitution states a woman can kill.
There is no constitutional right to kill.
That very ignorant girl has no right, written or morally, to kill a child. She also has no right denying the science of genetics.
It is not “abortion”. It is not “choice”. It is not a “woman’s choice”. It is murder, killing, death. Is there ever an instance when “abortion” does not end in death? Isn’t death the goal? Yes, making the cause, described by whatever term or word the killers use, still just what the act intends and deliver: death. Killing causes death. A mission can be aborted but because it does not necessarily cause death, it is called, accurately, aborted. Killing a child, a baby is undeniably death sentencing, so it is not what the devils of population control by slaughter call it. It is killing.
You cannot, simply cannot report an aborted mission as killing if death did not follow. However, death always follows abortion therefore it cannot be called an aborted event or mission, or abortion. It is killing.
The result is death, not abortion, therefore the act that leads to the death of another is not abortion, not choice, not a “woman’s choice or the right to a woman’s own body, or the right to decide, or the right to woman’s reproductive health.
A pregnant woman has already exercised her right to her reproductive health by getting pregnant. That claim, that distortion is fraught with deception and delusion. The result, being death, has absolutely nothing to do with right to reproductive health care. She already reproduced.
Is there life after reproductive exercise, “reproductive health”? YES!, and it is illegal to take it.
And what of the right of the child to its reproductive health care, stifled, terminated, ended, slaughtered, denied, killed, murdered, bled—out!
Nowhere is there a right for a “woman” to kill another.
By all titles and rhetoric the result is death for the child therefore it cannot be called anything but killing, and there is no Constitutional right to kill.
If a “woman”, truly a blood-sucking vampire, claims she has a right to kill, then we all do or we, men, are second class citizens. To raise men from second class citizenship the right to kill must also be extended to men.
This is not going to happen because there is no right to kill.
Denying the science of genetics in which a child borne by a human, created by two human genomes, is not a human, is murderous deception.
blood-thirsty women and men can call genetics-denial whatever they want, but the resultant is death of a child, and anything causing death, by premeditation, is murder. It is killing, not abortion, not choice, not a woman’s choice.
In fact the law states it is illegal to take another’s life.
There is no question in this universal law about the age, the vulnerability of the premeditated victim, or the so-called inconvenience of the killer.
The law is clear, everywhere. It is illegal, immoral, and particularly reprehensible to take the life of an innocent and vulnerable person, including a child that does not belong to a woman, EVER!
How is it that the “women” of America somehow believe they have a right to kill and murder? That act of taking life places them above others, and they miss that point as well because the Constitution is meant to make all equal before the law.
Killing another human being places a whole class of political vampires and their whores above the law and speaking and describing it accurately defines murder and murderers.
I have not mentioned the political trap set by evil dementocrat luciferians, but will do that in another comment, soon. I feel it brewing now.