I WONDER. NEWS, TODAY: REPORT THAT WE WENT TO THE MOON IN SPACE SHIPS WITH LESS TECHNOLOGY THAT VEHICLES HAVE TODAY. NO WAY!

Has anyone gone back and looked at the computers used in the space program of the 1960s? Not only is it archaic but if it is true that those computers were less tchnologilly capable than vehicles today there is no way they could respond fast enough for a trip around th corner to the grocery store.

Have you ever watched th computer geeks at the command posts, as they worked, apparently worked? They do nothing. What are they working on? Were they using Pascal, rotunda or caveman programming?

For gawd’s sake, there is nothing they could do while a so-called space ship was in flight. How slow would those computers have been? An abacus would have been faster.

The speed of computation could not have been ay faster than personal computers of the 1990s and early 2000s, slow.

Two variables to consider: how fast was data gathered while those nerds sat at those boxes, and how fast could a caveman computer translate the data and by what programs was data acquired and interpreted?

You will find no answers because the mute, colluding corrupt media was in in the scam.

Take your first cell phone out of retire, text a few sentences, go to the internet, wait for it, wait for it….oh yeah, forgot, not 5G, or 4G, or 1G. It was bits per second, analog, not wireless or fiber.

It must have been a hell of a long telecommunications cable going from the NASA command center and following that space craft as it left orbit and wrapped around the earth a few times on its way to the :moon”.

How did they communicate with the space craft, radio waves? Too slow. How fast does sound travel in a ir? How fast does sound travel in a vacuum? How fast does radio wave travel in air? How fast in a vacuum? Does it?

I do not know, I am asking.

Has everybody forgotten? It was NASA that created space flight then and it is NASA fabricating global warming today.

Take a look at the scientific paper I have included for your sensory bombardment.

I was in the labs in my university eduction. Every lab experience, every experiment, every investigation at the library into prior studies and experiments, began with an outline, description of the study and/or experiment. Every single study and experiment had a hypothesis, a mode of collection of data, parameters for collating and interpreting data, and a means of connecting the intended data to a predetermined effect of defined and isolated causes. Cause and effect was clearly identified, defined, and organized.

We have never seen a shred from NASA.

Today we are bombarded with effects and solutions taken from absolutely nothing resembling cause, stimulus, data, measurements or predetermined collation methodology.

There was absolutely nothing in the aluminum foil days of the LM of Apollo 11, 12 13. Three trips to the moon with landings, organized and directed by nerdy geeks on computers with less power than your watch today. IMPOSSIBLE!

We are being grotesquely and grossly manipulated, deceived, exploited and discarded.

NASA, IPCC, NOAH, WMO, AAAS, and others are all void of cause, data, measurements, but they all offer up effects without connection to their stated causes. There must be data, pre and post testing, isolation of a variable to test and hypothesized variable. Never do we see a control group of control data. NEVER! How is solution possible without cause? Impossible!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s