SLUT-DICTATOR MENDENHALL MANDATE IS NOT LAW. IGNORE IT!

Slut-
dictator
mendenhall
mandate
ISN’T law.
liberalnewsreview.com

May-whore
mendenhall
mandate 
ISN’T law.
IGNORE
dictates!
liberalnewsreview

Bolshevik
slut menden-
hall mandate
no authority.
Ignore her
dictates &
hang her!

I look at Mendenhall and think of some of the pretty girls from my high school days. Some of them I would not spend a second with because they are dishonest, exploitive, sluttish and generally sub-human scum. Of course, in high school we do not think of principles the same as we do now, but I had my chances to date the popular girls, and found many quite shallow and self-serving. I imagine mendenhall, somewhat handsome, was popular. After all, she did win a popularity vote, probably cheated, like dementocrats do.

So I presume nothing decent of a bolshevik whore who somehow, from somewhere, managed to find bolshevik tactics that enslave and switch decency for graft, honesty for politics, and subvert OUR Constitutional guarantees.

Inviting bolshevik lives matter (BLM) to change OUR police force is as disgusting a scandal and collusion as ever. That act alone, destroyed OUR representative process proving, once again, the dementocrats are primarily party oriented, serving their democracy and in the process destroying the rest of the country’s representative republic. This subversion includes the representative process for democrat party supporters. My point? Was there one democrat party voter who asked slut mendenhall to invite the bastard bolshevik murderers to SLC to control OUR police? Democrat voters were disenfranchised by slut-dictator mendenhall, as well as thousands of other puppet dictators. Democrat voters’ votes at this point did not count.

Slut-dictator mendenhall then pulled a sneaky trick on We, the People, with the help of the corrupt media, of course. This qualifies as voter suppression.

Slut-dictator mendenhall, the corrupt “NEWS” reported, without representative instruction, gave “raises” to new police officers, making them her own. No raises for veteran officers? The article claims 30 percent raises for new recruits. Even the reality is poorly defined. This is not a raise. A raise an increase in pay and that does not qualify for new people who do not have an income to increase, or raise. It could be reported as an increase in starting income, more correctly, but who told that slut to do that?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s