It is a given. We, conservatives and republic-oriented Americans know that when ABC, MSNBC, NBC, NPR, CNN report anything, the opposite is almost always the truth.
ABC reports, “Media crews at the scene of the pro Trump mob that breached the capitol building on Wednesday were attacked and their gear destroyed.”
Who did it? Can ABC provide a name? No? You see, if there is no direct accusation, there is no perpetrator, and that makes the claim a lie.
We, conservatives and republicans, safely, almost absolutely presume liberal media sources lie. In this case I need not bother investigating because the rhetoric (lies) of ABC are obvious and, therefore, discount the NEWS as typical bolshevik, liberal media “NEWS”.
But let me back up for those of you looking for a little reality, proof maybe, of my claims that ABC fraudulently “reported” NEWS.
In America we are presumed innocent. All of us are presumed innocent until proven guilty. This is one significant aspect of a Bill of Rights, absent in every democracy in the world. But ABC, in this report and as usual, presumes the worst, every time, and then fabricates and builds upon their own lies.
To presume is bad enough but ABC, typically goes further as an apologist “NEWS” source for international progressives, bolsheviks and maoists.
ABC attaches a judgement by inserting a description that is definitely not proven nor with evidence. If the description were favorable to President Trump, it would still be biased, dishonest and illicit.
ABC, a person of ABC, called a group of somebodies a “mob”. That is the only truth the author, Julio Rosas has. He cannot identify that group as belonging to or identifying with any person until Rosas investigates and gets truth itself.
Is ABC, particularly Rosas, correct in assuming? Did any single ABC “reporter” even try to ask who any one person of the group is, and then follow up? So lacking in professional journalism is ABC, particularly Rosas, in this “news” article, it is less credible than a child’s attempt to make an adult guilty for the child stealing a cookie.
I liken it to this: The IIHF (International Ice Hockey Federation) just finished its annual, international junior hockey tournament. Julio Rosas, if he had been covering the championships with the same acumen and “professionalism” as he covered his story regarding media attacked and equipment destroyed, would report the tournament like a silly child.
Julio’s expertise, in my estimation, is the following anecdote: This is me, liberalnewsreview, writing from Julio’s indisputably hate-motivated bias: (Julio reporting):
’There was a hockey tournament and a bunch of teams showed up, from nowhere, somewhere. We don’t know who they are or from what parts of the country or world they came. I think there were 7, maybe 15 teams: not sure. Again, they showed up from nowhere, arriving in buses that apparently came from airports, maybe this one, in Edmonton Alberta. You can see the ice. It was assaulted by ice skates. I am sure it was the international figure-skating mob.
“Julio” continues. ‘The tournament progressed and two teams emerged from two sides of play to play, for the championship crown. It must have been two figure skating clubs because they wore skates. Well, someone wore skates but I hate figure skating (did I say that out loud?).
The prize might have been a ring for each player. But, on second thought, maybe it was a cup, or cups, or a gold piece commemorating…I don’t know for sure.
Yes, two teams played, and one of them won the game. I don’t know who the teams are that played but I am sure it was the evil, figure-skating team that won, and they must have cheated and been backed by the evil ruler of their city, state, country, whatever.”
There you go, great “journalisming” (as Ben Shapiro calls it) by an absolute idiot, lying fraud, bolshevik-backed sub-human moron, Julio Rosas.
What is sad and sickening is that there are people, actual people, who lend credibility to this ABC, totalitarian apologist. Does ABC think? Do the people at ABC have capacity to look at themselves and ask simple, human-type questions such as, ‘do I sound smart or hate-motivated in this article?’ ‘Do I sound like an idiot who does not know Constitution, Bill of Rights, and reality? ‘Do I sound like a journalist who actually knows journalism, or do I sound like a dimwit liar? ‘Do I care as long as the innocent who I hate, pay and suffer, and the guilty who pay me, are free of criminal prosecution?’
Is ABC so stupid, or is ABC extremely dishonest and treacherous?
Who will now believe Rosas’ “report” or ABC’s fantastic journalisming? Did ABC ever presume and identify violent rioters in Portland, Seattle, New York, and other cities a “mob” or democrat party supporters?
Did ABC ever insert presumptive, judgmental adjectives to describe what they absolutely did not know, or refused to report accurately regarding burning, looting, killing, destroying in these dem/lib controlled cities and states?
Did ABC ever accuse and attach presumptive guilt to “leaders” of democrat controlled cities and states for being irrefutably dishonest or supporters of marxist/bolshevik tactics?
Again, I need not read and you need not believe the lying, liberal, la-la-land media because the very title itself reveals bias, fraudulent reporting, presumption of guilt and association, and presumption of intent and action: all premeditated to manipulate weak minds and make themselves rich off the labors, risks and losses of weak minds.
So, do you, want to continue to be the loser dem/libs identify and use?
Again, what sources or evidence did ABC find to declare that those who breached the Capitol Building were a mob? What evidence or witnessing did ABC provide to prove, beyond a shadow of a doubt (as the law goes) that the media crew was even attacked? What evidence does ABC provide that proves the media crews attacked were attacked by who they say? What evidence does ABC provide to show the same people, mob, or protest group were the same that attacked, invaded, or destroyed all the mentioned areas? Nothing? How can a group of people be in three places at the same time?
Do you, dear fellow American sanctioned and protected by the same Bill of Rights as Rosas and myself, see how Rosas took the law into his own hands, and applied guilt to a ghost mob he claims has affiliation with President Trump, when he has absolutely nothing to show a shred of truth to his claim? In fact he has less than nothing, a fabrication of a connection and unjust judgement. This makes Rosas less, far less than an actual journalist/reporter. What then, is he? He is a filthy, bastard bolshevik.
Is ABC so stupid it, the dishonest writers, particularly Julio Rosas, accuse “trump supporters”, or a fabricated Trump mob, of attacking and destroying all the edifices and media camp?
Why no police for media? How did that happen? Is the lack of police presence a result of defunding?
You have been tricked into thinking a thing commits crimes. There is no law against a thing committing a crime. Is there a law against a rat being a rat and eating your stored food?
I am sorry to tell Rosas and sub-journalistic ABC but there is no person by the name of “Trump mob” or “Trump supporters”, that committed a crime. However, it would be prudent to know who did what damage and who attacked whom, and why. Can moronic ABC and dimwit, liar Rosas provide a name? It is so evil that liars and la-la-land liberals generalize so they can accuse the vast majority of peaceful protestors, as a mob or Trump-supporters. It is destructive to society that Rosas and ABCpropagate their presumptive, hate-motivated, unauthorized judgements, making innocent people guilty. It is evil, like Rosas, that bastard bolshevik political agent of international tyranny.
Will the police investigate and lay charges against those who committed offense? If not then no guilt can ethically be attached to anyone. But, regrettably that is not the lying, liberal dementorcratic, progressive plan for peace and “moving forward”.
How fortunate for dementocrats that “Trump-mob” and “Trump-supporters” are presumed guilty.
Is there a law against a mob being a mob, a protest protesting or a group holding signs? It is devastatingly dishonest and evil to accuse and attach guilt to a group when not all in any group commit crime, but this is the sick, inhuman, bolshevik twist that gives dem/lib progressives and liberals impunity for their crimes and offenses while making innocent opposition guilty and punishable. The media makes judgement, and it is dead wrong.
For justice, not twisted liberal media just-us to be invoked, it is requisite that Rosas and ABC mutts provide a name: one name of a person, investigated for a particular, defined crime, and then charged. Until that fruition there can be no justifiable, honest attachment of guilt, except by sick, demented, la-la-land lying, liberal media bastard bolsheviks, such as Rosas and ABC.
If you want to believe the manipulative, fraudulent, lies of ABC, go ahead. It is you they manipulate, use, and send to risk your life and limb for their profits and gains.