A new perspective ofFaucenstein and governors with relation to pharmaceutical companies.
This is a rough draft. I have to go to work. I do not get paid for any of my commentaries or any of my work. I have written no less than 5,000 commentaries and posts to combat the disinformation, fabrications, and outright hatred tyranny posts on craigslist.
I publish articles now on my third attempt at creating a viable website. Two former sites were sabotaged and shut down. I mention one saboteur, a Jamie Putnam Inscore, whom I hired to help me, and she stole all my work and, poof.
I am lucky I have all my work, somewhere, but have not gone back through my thousands of articles and thousands more rough copies to restore the articles and commentaries. This site is current, and I have more than enough work to do in covering current “NEWS”.
Have you heard the ads for Pfizer, Moderna and others?
Have you heard the disclaimers? Have you noticed the ads promote a product from their labs, their inventions and efforts, while warning of side effects.
The Pharma companies spend fortunes and expend great effort in a cause-and-effect search for “cures”. The Pharma companies expend great effort in scientific research. There is a lot of evidence in the ads, bad or good, that is irrefutably noticeable. It could be considered science, scientific
What have the governors and Faucenstein given us?
When I write, as I have been since February 2020, about this scam, I remind you to think of the Pharma ads and compare.
Where is the evidence from any governor or Faucenstein that there is science behind their lockdowns? Have they mentioned the labs doing studies? Have they mentioned side effects? Have they alluded to anything even remotely resembling a reference to appear?
Have the governors and Faucenstein, and their lacky agents, given us political answers to scientific questions? Yes.
I have been asking since February, where is the science? You think the question is moot because there is science behind the innumerable “NEWS” conferences and reporting. Show me the science, after you have learned scientific methodology. Until you know the science and the way we work information to create “science”, you cannot show me the science. When you do finally research, study, and understand scientific methodology and the characteristics of it, you will not be able to show me the science either, because, you will see the absence of it.
Until then, how dare you question me questioning them to show us something more than political science.
So, where is the science?
Has faucenstein mentioned a single study by name? A study is sub-scientific to begin with, but it could be at least a little evidence for science in use.
Instead faucenstein started with fears and generalities: politics from a political appointment.
Faucenstein continued with recirculated theories and apparent applications of theories: political science.
The governors and Faucenstein pretended lockdown and isolation was science; that it was scientifically, epidemiologically grounded. It is political science, lockdown for control of people, not viruses.
Organizing the media, or following the media’s fabrication, in ignorance; using generalities, fear and deflection to distract the whole world, basically, from the fact that without a beginning in time or place, the whole beginning and existence is questionable.
The fear and deception easily slid into extortion of the masses. Again, political science: control the masses with fear and organized, imposed ignorance through distraction, deception, and deflection. Where is the laboratory that found covid? Where, who created it or how was it created? Not sure of this idea yet. It is unclear but formulating in my thoughts. Maybe when I get back to this work it will be organized…
…more to follow