Do not be surprised if President Trump does not win. Does he have an ace up his sleeve? We should not be surprised if he has been fighting his adversaries behind the scenes all along but I have greater fears than that. I would be more concerned for a plan should he win and the democrats riot.
The only way he will win is if the democrats estimated the degree of cheating they need to steal the right percentage while not making it obvious. It is totally obvious to those who look at one poll: turnout to rallies.
The democrat party and co-conspiring agencies, “Trump Resistance” and “shut down DC”, two examples, have mobilization plans to reverse election results should President Trump be re-elected. The scenarios for which they have planned are seditious. If President Trump has not planned to deter and respond, whether he wins or loses, he is abrogating his duty. I have seen foresight and anticipation in President Trump’s character.
There is nothing more the progressives; the international bolsheviks would want than to see America resort to dictatorship or monarchy. It does not matter how it is accomplished or what party it is. Once the road to dictatorship or oligarchy is begun, it will be hard to dislodge, the progressives and democrats believe. Once kingship or centralized rule is accomplished, no matter the title or name, democrats know it is a matter of time until they install one of their own. Totalitarianism is then accomplished.
If this scenario, one of many the democrats and progressives have been preparing for, seems impossible or far-fetched, consider the centralizing of power the democrats have already accomplished, calling their own anti-democratic practices, democratic. Proof is in their resistance to the democratic process of electing officials. The democrat party is already hegemonic, in sedition, and working to eliminate opposition, in contravention of the democratic/representative process the founding fathers established and to which the democrats have submitted. The democrat party, citing their resistance to, and hatred for, the democratic process of America, is proving their treasonous plans.
The President has responsibilities. He has a responsibility to perpetuate the representative processes which facilitate a transition or maintained presidency.
People who work for money do not serve. Especially true is that Americans who work in American politics do not serve. Serving is something charitable people do for free. Did you, dear democrat, know this?
The words, serve, server, service, irritate me to no end. I put myself through college as a waiter. I was not a server. Today waiters and waitresses are called servers. Changing, co-opting our language to flip-flop meanings is part of the de-humanizing efforts by the international bolsheviks: progressives and democrats. Socialism does not qualify as democracy. It is a fallacy being promoted as a political system when it is primarily an economic system of ravishment for the political elite.
This subjugation of our language is one to create servers of ravishers and ravishers of those who serve: President Trump being the supreme example.
President Trump is the only true public servant in America. I know of no other representative or politician who has worked in office and given away every cent of his pay. He serves.
I hope democrats’, liberals’ and bolshevik/progressives’ heads explode over this reality. Have we not seen these sub-humans go crazy, violent and insane over realities in every aspect of life?
We the people have spoken. We want President Trump re-elected. While we have engaged a representative process, that allows all to participate in the self-governance process, the democrats have engaged in politics: vastly different from self-governing Constitutional representation, serving themselves in their private circles of democracy, excluding, openly, constitutional republic representation.
The erroneous dialectic, that democrats are left-wing and republicans are right wing, is better understood that democrats, liberals and especially progressives are part of democracy, a left-wing position while opposition is not the right wing of a compromised scale. The balanced middle is the opposition the democrats malign.
According to democrat/bolshevik co-opting and deception the scale is not what the democrats, liberals and progressives have claimed.
To further illustrate, if democrat is left wing and republican is right wing, what would be the balance between the two? It is undefinable because of the shifting, subjective names and characteristics of both positions.
However, the original delineations that left wing is total government control: monarchy or totalitarianism (by any name) while right wing is anarchy: no organized rule, places the current placements in turmoil. One party cannot redefine anything to suit their ideology, no matter how they try. The definitions stand on their own. Left is totalitarian, right is anarchist, and republic is the balance of the two.
Perhaps it is the balance of the ideals and practices the progressives and dem/libs find offensive. Why have they not been able to voice this? Is it perhaps because they do not want you to know their attacks on the other “side”; the republican “side” is deceptive? Is it perhaps because they do not want you to know their attack is on the decent balance and decency of the constitutional republican principle of representation? Is it perhaps because they do not want you to know one “side” has representation as the primary goal while the other “side” has self-preservation and elitist self-serving democracy as its primary goal?
Liberal News Review 