RESPONSE TO BOISE IDAHO CRAIGSLIST POST OF OCTOBER 7TH, 2020, “Trump’s American Values”

RESPONSE TO BOISE IDAHO CRAIGSLIST POST OF OCTOBER 7TH, 2020, “Trump’s American Values”

Original Craigslist html:
https://boise.craigslist.org/pol/d/boise-trumps-american-values/7210162290.html

Liberalnewsreview link, click here

So what if he made that comment, “Grab them by the pu__y”? Was it for all America to hear? People talk.

Have you heard the banter in women’s change rooms? A girl-friend of mine, some time ago, was quite explicit in describing the disrespect for men most American women openly share with each other, in expected privacy, The corresponding language of some is quite offensive. So what? Don’t listen.

The rest of the hate-poster is a list of lies.

Maybe bolshevik-dick can show us a newspaper clip or police report. All this “information”, if it were true is public knowledge. No?

Would a person trying to convince another of something not use all information and means available to change another’s mind? Are dem/libs so dumb they don’t know, or are they dishonest, trying to manipulate others in ignorance?

You see, dear reader, the tactic has no substance and no integrity.

Backing is a general term for providing a source, a witness, or document.

Propaganda discards this need and pursues an emotional, disconnected course to manipulate.

Propaganda means propagating information but inherent in the definition is the condition that the information is misleading, false or deceptive.

Did President Trump collude with Russia, for example?

Is this not the claim democrats and some republicans, the entire liberal media complex and others, have made for years?

Russian collusion, Russian collusion, Russian collusion, sounds like the grumble words actors use to make the sound of a mob.

Is the propagation of misinformation the goal of the comic-strip post, “Trump’s American Values”, or is it real and truthful reporting? Did someone search and find these things, and then report, or did someone begin by writing a list of things fro shock the senses? It seems the latter takes precedence when one checks the veracity of just one claim. What are the crimes, again?

Russian collusion is one such accusation. Is it a crime?

What if it had been Canadian collusion? Is collusion the offense or is Russia or Canada the offense? Can the author of the comic strip please explain what offenses each accusation represents?

Why is the accusation made in such a generalized word, Russia? Can “Russia” witness or provide evidence? Do the democrats know this? Do they know Russia is a very big and complex country? it is fraudulent, and goes against one very important, major “value” of American life; a value that is inextricably connected to justice? Do the democrats know what presumption of innocence is? Of course they know. They have been hiding behind it for decades, maybe centuries. It is part of our American tradition that we presume the best of each other, all being part of one society working together one way or another.

We do not build this country, engaging in commerce, trade, and culture for the benefit of the economy. The economy is inanimate. We do not work together, enjoin in military and long-term programs for military institution rather, wo organize ourselves into a collection of resources for legitimate self defense, for selves and each other.

We do not salute the flag, sing anthems for the sake of the dirt or the shores that define American soil, rather we respect the flag as a collective reminder that it represents We, the People, and the values and traditions that allow us all to live in collective self defense, justice and presumption of the best from each other.

With what part of Russia did President Trump collude? Did someone see him over there, in Siberia, colluding with the vast forests? Was he talking to trees? Who saw what?

Did he collude with the dirt? Did he collude with the water surrounding the Kamchatka peninsula? Did he collude with Moscow, and what part, the spires, the cats and dogs, somebody? Was this evil, dastardly collusion accomplished by nothing with nobody over nothing that happened that anyone witnessed? Was he even there?

Did he talk to someone, maybe an ambassador? At least he did not kill one of his, our own, like Barack and Clintons did: Ambassador Stevens.

Let us look at the loose, the mentally dysfunctional communication skills and composition. Without an object the subject does nothing. In fact, without an object, the action of the subject does not exist. For example: I went. If I did not go somewhere, basically I did not “went”. Is it a lie if I mention I went, nowhere?

President colluded, the anti-witnessing goons proclaim. With whom did president Trump collude? Did President “went”, or collude somewhere and with someone? When and where did he go, and with whom did he collude?

If the conditions are not met that he went somewhere and that he colluded with someone, not a bag of dirt in Siberia, then the collusion claim is a lie.

This explains the whole of democrat party democracy. Somebody did something even nothing was done to anyone, but democrats want blood. It is a different presumption to presume guilt without evidence. It is more cynical and devastating to proclaim the results of a crime, without evidence oil a rime, yet democrats constantly do it, relying on the ignorance of cause-and-effect challenged, and deductive-reasoning-void well wishers hoping without evidence of reality, for gain from nothing. The gain can only be accomplished after this lack of reality is bypassed, by theft, plunder and ravishment. Welcome to democrat party democracy, and liberal la-la-land just-us.

Is it a lie if there is no evidence of collusion? Can anyone define collusion and state how it is considered and where it is notarized a crime?

Four years of democrat and liberal media accusations and witnesses; witnesses  not even remotely witnessing anything, exposes distinct dem/lib fraud, if not a complete lie. It is all to propagate a lie that  a fabricated result of crime proves there is a crime.

Through four long years of dem/lib accusations, we never heard from a witness who actually witnessed something. Democrats did not present a single witness and some republicans jumped into the child-id democrat parade of silly clowns of the liberal media/democrat party circus.

For the purpose of endorsing a product, would it be wrong to identify someone as an Olympian who never participated in the Olympics? Unless the Olympic Commission cared and sued, it might only be a financial waste of money to pay for such buffoonery, but democrats have done it for four years, and still bother, harass and accuse President Trump and try to trick We, the People with the major missing link, a witness.

The tradition of presumption of innocence is under the democrat/liberal/progressive boot. This unique American tradition is drawn from centuries-old development of justice. American justice is American culture: legally, legitimately, and ethically connected with law. It is this very unique and liberating tradition democrats, liberals and marxist/progressives attack.

You, yourself, dear fellow American, democrat or republican, liberal or libertarian, would demand your right to be presumed innocent if you had been under the same four year long attack, for just one day. And yet, democrats have not one whit of sense for the rights to presumption of innocence in their four year long hatred. Democrats cannot find one day of preponderance for the institution of justice and equality before the law. Dem/libs cannot find a scintilla of cognition for the near-sacred tradition of each and every citizen in America who has an undeniable irrefutable right to live free of oppressed, unjust, burden of guilt.

The democrats paraded democrat political clowns before the American representative republic, and they do it every day.

They know their charges and accusations are fraudulent, but they hope the cruel and self-serving disparaging will eventually blossom into information, as opposed to misinformation. They know misinformation does not become information, just as they know that cartoons do not one day come to life. Or do they know this?

Lies, accusations and attempted applications of guilt without trial and evidence, does not continually stack up and magically come to life as real, but dem/libs, played by the puppet master marxist progressives, do not care for the sanity and minds of themselves: their own slip into hate-motivated insanity of cause-and-effect, presumption and justice.

A list of accusations, as fabricated in the “poster” cartoon, backed by nothing and no object of the subjective offense or crime, makes empty accusations to be known lies: dem/lib, progressive/marxist propaganda.

We see in that comic strip 40 offenses. Some are offenses. Some are accusations of crime.Some are things like business loss that happens to all kinds of people. Some of the things in the list are outright silly, and cannot even be taken seriously for the character assassination attempt, and nothing else that they are: hate.

Let us start with the accusations:

Grab them by the p___y: one event found offensive by those who hate so much they discard American tradition, they claim offensive in others: presumption of innocence.

Was, is it a point made: a point for a crime? No, but let us give it half a point for offensive: .5

For other points of an argument, let us break down each accusation, avoiding presumptive, evil generalities:

Child rape accusations: 0

White supremacy/incessant condemnation of it: 0

Dishonoring Gold-Star families:   0

Birther conspiracy: started by Hillary Clinton, Trump wondered, so what? 0

Other attempts at points of argument (40):                                                 all:  0

Character assassination over life events: 3 disavowed.  0

I count, of 40 things listed, 36 that could be offenses, and crimes but have ZERO evidence, ZERO backing, ZERO credibility, and invoke the American tradition of presumption of innocence because there is no evidence.

So, the agent provocateur made 40 accusations, 36 of which could be offensive or criminal, but credulity is given .5 for only one accusation, one point the agent provocateur, bolshevik-dick, is right .5 of 36 claims, or 1.29 percent of the accusations.

Is this the kind of sense and honesty you want ruling you?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s