10,883 out of 10,885 is not 97 percent.
Written by scientists or dem/libs?
So there are two scientists of dissenting opinions?
Only two? What are their names?
That is so funny. These morons expect people to believe there are two that don’t believe global warming is a hoax?
I thought the number was 97 percent.
If these buffoons are going to lie, at least get the lies close to accurate.
Out of 10,885 “scientists” (laugh), 97 percent would be 10,558.45m, leaving 27 dissenters. Where did the other 25 go? Did they vanish, with the 10,883, or did they not exist to begin with, like the 10,883 global hoaxers, I mean warmers?
Do I seem afraid to look at this objectively, honestly, rationally?
Really, tell us which lie it is, 97 percent of all democrat party-paid scientists agree, or is it that only two don’t agree?
Ask your doctor if paying him or her for services not rendered is right for you. Ask your doctor if paying for services not rendered is right for him or her. Ask your global hoaxer, I mean warmer if your sacrifice but not his/her/its, is right for the planet.
That’s too funny. Such a boring moronic conflict of interest this site has never seen, and it can only come from a lunatic liberal from la-la-land.
10,883 scientists?
What are their names?
That is funny. Really, who are they? Are they nameless fabrications from the lunatic leaps of the lost in la-la-land liberal mind?
Which mind? Who collected the names?
Who did the survey?
Where is the survey information?
Anyone that sponsors a survey wants the information published. Where is the survey?
Where is the publication?
Where is the list of names?
Morons!
Tell us. Is there a list in Scientific American?
Is there a list of names in Popular Science?
Is there a list of names in who’s making money from the dem/lib trillion dollar stimulus?
Anybody that expends that much effort, to survey that many people, certainly knows their reputation and credibility are questionable until the burden of proving their hypothesis is correct.
At the worst they want their information published or it is nothing.
Where is the raw data?
Who are these “scientists”?
Ok, maybe a different approach would work.
Who are the two that do not agree?
Where can we find them?
You see, dear reader, the liberal rats will not even mention their names because we would see a whole community of consistency, opposing global hoaxing, I mean warming.
You can go to petitionproject.org and see the names of the 31,487 scientists who agree, global hoaxing, I mean warming, is a hoax.
Oh, but wait. If we give the loser-libbies, the math retards, another chance maybe we can find the 10,883 lost global hoaxing, I mean warming, scientists that agree.
Petition project.org lists 31,487 scientists. The total is 31,487.
If we add the 10,883 to that number we have 42,372 scientists who believe global warming/climate change is a hoax. Please, serve yourself with rfact, truth, and reality. Go to the site and pick a nam. You will find a real person, while the 10,883 cannot be found, except for a handful I mention in a different commentary.
Of these 10,883 who “believe” in peter pan….I mean never-never land, I mean global hoaxing, I mean, math, a little over 200 of them, actually exist and can be found on the list of the la-la-land liberal 10,883 consensus of science. How solid, is that consensus if 200 of 10,883 exist? Hmmm, let’s do the math, real science: about 2%.
The consensus is worth about 2% of reality, truth and integrity. That barely meets the requirements for margin of error, much less margin of correct hypothesis or theory, or science.
Boy, this new math by these liberal super intellects, is tough.
In fact, the percentage is not even close. In fact the percentage that believe is less than 50 percent, making the loser libbies, AGAIN, the VAAAAAAAAST minority.
Woo hoo, that’s close to 97 percent, if we take a 300 percent margin of error.
Margin of error: a little tough for poopy pantser utardidiot to figure out. A normal scientific margin of error is about 2 to 4 percent: unless you are a dem/lib peter pan.
Really, he could fly, if he existed. Hmm, existence, kind of a big, important factor.
The loser libbies, taking a mid range margin of error of 3%, are off by more than 33 times a normal margin of error, 33 times as much as their own margin of actuality.
WOW! That is some kind of nightmarish math.
But, tell us why the global hoaxers, I mean warmers, want our compliance.
Tell us why the global hoaxers, I mean warmers, want We, the People to surrender OUR rights and freedoms, OUR hard earned cash, cars and heated homes?
And to whom do they want these things surrendered, to those who have not given up these monstrous planet-killing toxins?
This dem/lib, progressive/bolshevik hypocrisy is deadly when we consider that 300 million Americans could be out of heat for the winters ahead, while the global hoaxing, I mean warming, pigs live lives of luxury and warmth.
It is potential genocide, by a bunch of math-retarded psychos.
And if their math is so bad in plain sight, how bad is all their math?
Maybe the reality is that we have global cooling. Trends, 30,000 scientists, common sense and reality indicate cooling.
Cartoons, fabrications with cool lines and colors, and lies do not make truth.
Fabricating numbers that do not match does not make truth or fact.
Again, who are these 10,883 scientists? What are their names? I crack me up.
Show us the list. How about utardia just show us a reference to the survey or company that collected the “data”?
Who did the survey, NOAA that cannot get the terminology correct? Morons!
Funny.
If I could draw a cartoon I would draw two white, old, men Hillary and moochelle oafama, riding a donkey backwards, claiming they are the 97 percent that “believe” global hoaxing, I mean warming, is an accurate science. The caption would be, spoken by hillary, of course, “we knowed it is currect, because we knowed it.”
Too funny, and of course, being consistent with dem/lib theology, a cartoon that insults democrats, liberals and global hoaxers, I mean warmers, makes the claim true.
Woo hoo. I win!
Yay.
We can all go home now, and turn up the heat, fire up those muscle cars, and throw our dem/lib neighbors into the streets to freeze in the “warm” winters (but not the deep freeze every year in the north east- it never happens).
If we were to stop the political/global elite from heating their homes and driving cars, the carbon print would drop massively. The is a very big return on investment, and we would beat global hoaxing, I mean warming.
YAY. We all win, and the dem/libs get what they want for others, for themselves: that they try to force upon others, not themselves.
NOT on my watch, you filthy pigs!
Liberal News Review 