CRITIQUE OF CHRISTOPHER WILSON’S YAHOO”NEWS” COMMENTARY OF APRIL 21st, 2020, “Who is behind the coronavirus social distancing protests?”

CRITIQUE OF CHRISTOPHER WILSON’S YAHOO”NEWS” COMMENTARY OF APRIL  21st, 2020, “Who is behind the coronavirus social distancing protests?”

Wilson should be referred to as senior fabricator.

I read Wilson’s article and wondered where the connection to his headline claim can be found. Wilson tries a number of tricks to deflect and distract from the fraud of the headline.

Like I always say/write: if it attacks the innocent like a bolshevik, if it attacks the middle class like a bolshevik, if it attacks truth like a bolshevik, it is a bolshevik. In this case, “it” is Wilson.

Tricks to make you, dear reader, think there is some kind of connection, are meant to manipulate you, yourself. Are you angry that someone is trying to organize and get conservatives to protest? Who says the organizer or protestors are conservatives? Why does this affect you? Is it because We, the People have a right to protest? Is “someone
“ Trying to attach a negative or offensive emotion to a headline claim?  Are you that easily manipulated?

Are you upset because someone is organizing rights to protest? Maybe it is because you think there is something inherently wrong that someone behind the scenes misdoing something morally reprehensible? Have you studied the words of the article to find why it is morally reprehensible? Is your anger due to your false perception of why people are protesting?

Two things to consider, fellow American supporter of democrat party and liberalism: Do you know what conservative is and do you think those who lie to you do so for your benefit?

What is a conservative? Typically a conservative supports small government. How much of your tax dollar do you think is used for We, the People? The bigger government gets the greater the loss due to corruption, inefficiency and nepotism. Not a single government person produces a thing. How many managers do you think a company with no production can support? Big government is a managing monopoly, monopolizing force of law, raw power against, you. Government that grows by creating more managers does so for itself: for the corrupt people that want to perpetuate their power and profit. When you witness growth of a government by the government itself, you witness self-serving protectionism.

Conservatives also support conserving the balanced middle, that is, Constitutional Republic.

Wait. You did not know, or do not believe that a Constitutional Republic is the balanced middle? Who has been lying to you all these years that America is a democracy?

Look for yourself. Find a democracy, just one; search the whole world, all of history, and find a democracy that has a Bill of Rights for the individual. Conservatives conserve those rights. Not that important, you think. Why would you think that unless you have been trained to think it?

Regarding these unimportant rights, pick one. Pick two, three.

Pick the right you will give up tomorrow. Find a non-conservative who supports conserving your rights, that one you just gave away.

You would be okay with loss of freedom to speak, correct? You have allowed democrats and liberals to speak for you, lying about the Constitutional Republic system of self-governance. Self-governance? Is that also a new term for you? Who speaks of self governance, democrats or conservatives?

When you surrendered truth to a system of top-down rule, as opposed to self-governance, and you allowed that entity or person to speak lies about truth, to you, you gave up your freedom of speech long ago.

You can only expect what follows the lies, that affect you. They will surely affect you because they are directed at you, and you had better not disagree or you will be called that nasty word, conservative.

Wilson is lying, for you and to you.

So, again. What rights are you willing to surrender, and to whom? Such a good example, because it is quite physical; actually they are all good examples because they are all physical and easy to visualize.

Surrender your right to love freely. How do you get to work? Will you be required to apply for a pass to work in this location or that? How many contractors, sub-contractors, truck drivers, delivery personnel will be required to beg permission, or apply? What if you are stopped without a pass? Are you going to enjoy jail? Will your attorney need to apply for a pass to see you before you are read your miranda rights? Oops, forgot. You don’t have any.

Why does Wilson try to make you believe, in ignorance, that constative is bad? Is Wilson an agent of non-conservative, or is he also willing to surrender his rights? Maybe, like most democrats and liberals, he thinks the law will not apply to him because he has served those who take your rights. Maybe he thinks he will be given a carte blanche pass because he lied to you, I mean wrote an article without verification or backing of claims,

So, to dissect Wilson’s fraud, I mean propaganda, I mean story, in the first paragraph he tosses three rights at you that have negative connotations? I wonder, if your home is being invaded and your neighbor has a gun, and you don’t, how long will I take police to send aid? If police are so busy taking applications for freedom of moverment; permission to move, when do you think an officer might have tome to get to you?

We do not have to “enjoy” that application of benefits from democrat liberal seizure of your rights. We already know that, without politicization, by the time the police arrive, you are already victimized, whether that means you are dead or robbed.

What if, however, you decide to call your neighbor because you know he understands the second amendment, has a firearm, and likes you and yours, and would come to your aid, in seconds. What if your neighbor is a “crazy”, gun-toting, conservative, who knows he does not have a right to freedom of movement about the country? If he comes to your aid, and the police arrive and check his “papers”, he could go to jail. You are on your own brother. The reality, and the purpose of politicizing everything to democrat rule, it would be worse with the loss of your rights and the requirement for papers and permission.

Is there a problem with being white? Is Wilson trying to get you to think there is something wrong with being white? Are you white? How does it feel to be presumed “guilty”?

Oh, you did not know that a conservative is committed to preserving, conserving your rights, and everyone’s right to face his or her accuser, and be presumed innocent? Sorry, that’s not you, anymore, because you believe liars such as Wilson. He tricked you three times in the first paragraph.

The protests are not only “against” social distancing orders. Protests were primarily against lock-down dictates. People need to eat and no government knows what We, the People want. Why did Wilson tell that lie? We had a protest right here in Salt Lake city, April 20th, 2020. It was a protest to get Governor Stalin-Herbert to lift the cower-at-home, I mean snivel-at-home, I mean shelter-at-home orders: dictates.

People are dying by these orders but neither Wilson nor Stalin-herbert care for that truth or reality. Wilson is concerned for the color of the skin of people at these rallies, and if they are exercising their rights to carry firearms. Wilson is probably lying about that anyway. Are you afraid to go to “conservative” protests against heavy-handed cower-at-home, I mean starve-at-home orders, because there might be people with firearms? I bet there was not a single person with a firearm at any rally, but Wilson needs you afraid so his lies seem more credible.

This is just the way of liars, propaganda agents, Wilson being one of the least effective.

You see, Wilson already has you afraid, of untruths. Wilson can now tell you anything and you will believe even though he has not provided sa single reference, truth, picture, or connection to his claims.

This is political science in its most disgusting application, democrats and liberals. Conservatives do not need to lie. Am I lying? I told you the founding fathers designed a balance between left and right. Do you know what is on the scale of left and right? Who told you it was democrat, left and republican, right? Whoever told you that is a liar, but that is accepted for decades now, because of the continual lies of one side, not the other. You see, one side is on a side while the other  “side” is, absolutely is the balanced middle: balanced between tyranny or totalitarianism on the left and anarchy on the right.

Don’t believe me, please. Go read  and learn for yourself, or trust Wilson.

Read The Federalist Papers. Loo at the introductions to the founding documents. Do they read the “democracy” of the United States or do they read, “The Constitution Of The Republic Of The United States”?

Wilson’s second paragraph is a mess, a meaningless twist of conditionals and oxymorons. He claims, “ Although…”.

Do I need to explain “although”? “Although” is a word used to inject an opposition and condition. Wilson begins this paragraph with “although”, a conditional, then makes another conditional claim, making the sentence and thus, the claim itself, doubly conditional, or highly unlikely, if not completely fraudulent. Tricks.

Although what you see and what we all see, without evidence of guns or racism, it is not real, although presumes to make the statement real.  How is that for a lie. Although I am standing outside your store, I have none of your merchandise on my person, and there is no evidence anyone has been in your store, much less broken into it, I m somehow, magically guilty because you say so? Although?

Do you see the hypocrisy and fabrication of fake reality? People wonder why conservatives, republic-oriented Americans and the President call Wilson and his “kind” of journalism fake news. It is fake, fabricated from literary tricks, rhetoric (lies) and outright hate-motivated trickery..

Wilson continues with a claim that the protestors, “…have largely been organized by conservative activists.”

What is a conservative activist? Does Wilson explain, define, describe what he is talking about? Can Wilson give us a clear understanding and an example? No? Would that be a fake claim from a fake news source? Is Wilson trying to create a fear or presumption in your mind?

Wilson’s sick and twisted tricks are just beginning. It is a pattern of manipulation.

Next trick, after [presumption, is to use authority then fake credibility, seldom credible, usually presumed credible and above the masses’ presumed sub-intelligence.

All you need to do is look at the sentence structure to realize it is a tactic to twist reality in your mind. What kind of loving father or other would do that to YOU?

Wilson, in addition to being a grammatical moron, cannot communicate propaganda very well. He being a new paragraph without a noun. The significance, in case you think this is insignificant, is that Wilson is a second rate writer, at best, failing to present reliable or credible information regarding anything. He is a loser at even the worst propaganda.

Why does Wilson write that the rallies are pushing back against social distancing when the truth is so far from what Wilson claims? Why is Wilson lying? Why do liars lie?

Here is the deep and dark secret about propaganda, misinformation and manipulation: liars lie because they believe they need to lie. Liars lie because the truth does not support their fabrications and deception.

The rallies are not political. Wilson, like all true bolsheviks (seriously), makes everything political because politics is the absolute rule by a ruling class. Wilson is part of that politicization of everything: even aspect of your life.

Politics requires that you think of the leader(s) when you eat your breakfast. Politics requires that you remember the leader (or leaders) saved you from this or that crisis. Politics requires that you forget the leader(s) made the numerous crises that reduced your rights until you had grants from the leader(s).

Wilson is involved in politicizing everything, for tyranny, the leader(s).

Wilson lies about it, naturally. He must.

So, the fifth paragraph, Wilson starts with a politicization of a protest. Wilson uses the word, “rally”. It was not a “rally”, it was a protest, like the protest my friends attended in Salt Lake City. Why does Wilson purposely use the word rally?

Rally is a word associated with conservatives and President Trump. Rally is now a conservative word, according the dem/lib propaganda. The democrats could not rally support so they decided to negate the positive effects by demeaning the word. Wilson is a part of that destruction, a bolshevik tactic, to destroy language to suit politics.

The people at the protest were protesting against republican governor. Did Wilson mention that protests by so-called republican-backed supporters were protests against republican governors? No, lying Christopher Wilson did not want that truth known because then the reality could not politicized to suit a democrat/liberal deception.

Rallies by republicans against republican governors are then, in reality, protests, not at all like Wilson propagates.

Wilson claims, “Some of the rallies are being pushed by Republican-allied groups in battleground states with Democratic governors.” Which “Republican-allied groups”? Can Wilson identify one? No, he does not even try because it is a lie, an opening to a paragraph to give his words a sense of credibility-by-emotional attachment, a fake attachment he created in the opening paragraph.One name of a real person would provide real credibility. Wilson’s goal is to deceive so he must lie, by fabrication of a scenario or connection that simply does not exist.

Maybe there is a connection. So what? Are democrats not connected to liberals and are liberal causes not backed by democrat groups? Did The DNC hire Christopher Steele, an ex- British agent, to fabricate a dossier regarding Trump? Yes, Hillary hire Fusion GPS who hired Christopher Steel to fabricate, form nothing, with the help of Steele’s Russian contacts, a hate-motivated dossier the democrat party used as pretense to illegally investigate President Trump. Was it this same dossier democrat-party supporters used to lie to the FISA courts to get warrants? So what if a political party is involved in these rallies? So what if a the republican party is involved in stopping democrat party-controlled states from roughshod over every citizen in that state, including democrat-supporting and ex-democrat supporting people? So what?

Did Wilson mention that the rallies included democrat-party supporting citizens? No. HHe is guilty of politicizing this. Politicizing means making a representative reality into a gain for the democrat party and the move left, on the scale: totalitarian government, democrats.

I could go on and on dissecting every line, every sentence and claim Wilson made. Everything he wrote in that political attack is an outright lie, or bolshevik magic to turn everything into a rally for democrat tyranny. Wilson is guilty of rallying by lying. Wilson is guilty of politicizing a simple protest by people who want to live. Wilson is guilty of attempting to turn a simple protest by people into a political event to support a political party, the democrats.

Wilson is guilty of all the things he attempts to attach to his political enemies, those for whom his democrat/liberal supporters hire him to attack.