Obviously this commentary was written and published in another site, yahoonewsreview, .com, some time ago, and is now being republished from that now defunct site. The site was shut down by my former web site advisor/hostess, Jamie Putnam Inscore (do not trust her with your work), but upon reviewing it this day, I realize the content is quite applicable for our current situation.
What the liberal media will not reveal:
How did Pelosi and Schumer acquire power over the whole House of Representatives?
Are there not 435 Representatives that represent approximately 300 million people?
Why has the liberal media ignored the voices of dissent and opposition to these two macabre, harlequins of totalitarian power?
What has happened to the voices of the other 433 representatives whose constituents’ wishes should also be made known to the public?
This situation is truly a perfect opportunity to display the corruption of democracy.
Pelosi and Schumer represent almost nobody in the whole of America. The two vote amongst themselves and decide, for themselves, what they themselves want, against almost all of America. In their own constituencies the majority wants border security, as polls show 87 to 93 percent of all Americans want money spent on border security.
President Trump is driven by a desire to honor his promise to build a wall and the power of tens of millions of Americans pushing him to do the will of the majority. Some may argue Clinton had the majority. I have written that, given the numbers that she and the democrat party drew to her rallies, compared to candidate Trump’s massive rallies, it is impossible she had over 30 percent of the popular vote. We must remember the deep state, the establishment government that represents nobody but itself, has control of the vote counting mechanisms. The counting mechanism was purposefully acquired to perpetuate non-governmental, un-representative governing, and this bureaucracy is who and what Pelosi and Schumer represent, unknown to the scores of millions of Americans.
Would it surprise you, dear fellow citizen, to know that the Federal Reserve is deceptively named. There is nothing Federally American about the FED. It is privately owned and dictates to Americans, in spite of appearances, interest rates and other policies. The FED is owned by international/globalist bankers, the ultra rich supra-nationals, who decide to limit American cash flow with high interest rates. It is the FED that manipulates and sends American economy into depression, recession, chaos, and war. Numerous documentaries can be found on youtube.
This massive bureaucracy is controlled by private banking, worldwide, unrepresentative ravagers and manipulators of economies, markets, peoples and lives.
This monstrous aberrance that controls we the people is Pelosi and Schumer, and a handful of deep state agents, voting in a democratic process against ALL of America. It is their democracy, a separate entity from our republican form of representation. They claim to represent but when they openly refuse the wishes of 87 to 93 percent of the constituents from the districts they claim to represent, they clearly do not represent anyone but themselves and the king-makers behind the scenes.
In a Constitutional Republic we have a representative government with only one of three bodies governing by majority. Even in the house of representatives today, majority rule is dashed by ad ictator, Pelosi.
Majority rule is an important aspect of self-governing but in only one half of one governing body.
Majority rule becomes tyranny when a majority can decide the demise or plunder of a different segment of the population. It is this reality that inspired the founding fathers to balance, with opposition, the tyranny of majority rule.
Only one half of one governing body is powered and authorized by majority rule, and that governing body today is tyranny by one dictator with the help of a few “leaders” operating as an oligarchical dictatorship. Dictatorial powers, not authority, having been seized by mechanisms beyond public scrutiny, by the rest of the democracy hounds wagging tails and submitting to the hands that feed them.
A Bill of Rights for individuals is only one hindrance to tyrannical, majority rule of democracy.
In the Senate the minority leader has power over authority. How did Chuck Schumer find such power to extort compliance from the Senate?
How have the democrats, two particularly, commandeered Congress and thus circumvented one, of only a few, hindrances to tyranny?
A Bill of Rights for individual citizens, that places god-given (or providence-given) individual rights above ruler-granted and politics-controlled rights, of representative self-governance is maintained in a republic. The same individual sovereignty is impossible in a democracy that follows its primary function as serving the members of itself, or adhering to the committee of selves, over all others.
Individual rights are also maintained by state opposition to centralized majority rule neutralizing centralized totalitarian authority by state competition for citizens. Contention and competition between state authority and intrusive, totalitarian centralized government was part of the genius of the founding fathers’ design of Constitutional Republic.
Which rights will you, dear democrat party democracy supporter surrender to central totalitarian rule? What have you already surrendered?
Originally State Legislatures appointed two Senators to represent each State. This placed enmity, by design, between centralized government and the states that more closely defended individual rights.
The principle is that States can be at odds concerning rights of the individuals, forcing states to compete for citizens that will naturally gravitate to states with stronger defense of individual rights. State economies, reflecting treatemnt of individual rights and opportunities, is one variable gauging of individual rights.
Majority rule principle does have its place but, as the founding fathers clearly distinguished, democracy, personal involvement in decision making for personal goals, is limited to small city states and populations of small cities. Democracy in America would have all voters, well over 150 million, personally vote on every law: a monstrous, logistical impossibility that the founding fathers predicted.
Majority rule has one other place of significance. In the Presidential election it behooves a Presidential candidate to know, beforehand, the characteristics and needs of the people of each state. States’ rights and, hence, state-protected individual rights, supersede majority rule of a potential conglomerate, the national majority. A neglected, ignored; poorly respected and politically disenfranchised population of a state, may be the votes a candidate needs to take the majority of electoral votes. This was Hillary Clinton’s big mistake. She and her campaign made many foolish assumptions, and as a result she ignored numerous states with small electoral votes, assuming they would cast their ballots for her because of traditional voting trends. Seemingly insignificant states, that Hillary ignored and showed little care, swung to Candidate Trump.
Pelosi and Schumer have been committing treason to approximately 90 percent of their own constituents, 90 percent of all Americans, and 99.8% of representatives in the House: refusing to allow a voice to 434 of 435 representatives. How did this tyranny evolve to destroy 99.8% efficacy of the representative process? It was done by subverting the representative process. The hate-stream, establishment liberal media, has flip-flopped everything to convince some of the masses of Americans that one representative can somehow speak for the majority of Americans while 434 representatives were forced to silence.
What the liberal media will not reveal, and the so-called conservatives are deaf and dumb to, is that this is NOT President Trump’s wall. The wall is OURS, and we want it built and our country secured.
The hate-stream media have droned and droned that this national security belongs to one man. The fraud and deception is astounding, but expect no less than outright hate-motivated fabrications and lies from the bolshevik-backed liberally biased, establishment media of CNN, MSNBC, CBS, ABC, NPR and others.
I have my concerns that President Trump may be seeking rule himself with executive orders, martial law and use of military tribunals. The proclamations and all-too-easily discovered leaks are everywhere on youtube. I consider only one of two possibilities.
I believe either President Trump is part of the international cabal, which explains why he has not been removed, pretending to be against the deep state/establishment politics while collecting information of those who may be constitutionally inclined or, Trump is actually doing what he appears to be doing: fighting for and saving America, being protected by what is not known to the public. Evidence shows he is what he claims, and what conservative and republic-oriented Americans hope and believe. He has executed very little by way of ruler-oriented executive orders and has totally left the Constitution untouched.
Either President Trump is part of the big deception, pretending to defend Constitutional Law, while videos, public addresses and rallies indicate he is about to suspend Constitutional Rule of Law or, he is actually in the process of arresting, charging and detaining tens of thousands of traitors to American Rule of Law, temporarily suspending rule of law.
It is a conundrum, but suspending rule of law, according to Constitutional Rule of Law, legal, as it were, may include, suspending Rule of Law for Martial Law.
We cannot know until we see the final push for justice or, as it were, what we will see unfold before as organized, dictatorial injustice.
We can only hope rule of law, and justice will prevail while we have witnessed decades of attempted totalitarian injustice to serve the political, establishment elitists.
We can hope that President Trump, like George Washington, will have the integrity to surrender power and authority to We, the People, when justice and order, are restored.
Liberal News Review 